Skip to main content

Main menu

  • IWA Publishing
    • About IWA Publishing
  • Subscribe
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • User Licences
    • IP Registration
    • IWA Member Subscriptions
  • Open Access
  • For Authors
    • Publish with Us
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Open Access
    • How to review a paper
    • Rights & Permissions
    • Article Promotion
    • Peerwith
  • For Librarians
    • Usage Statistics
    • Subscriber Services
    • Terms and Conditions
  • For Readers
    • Recommend to Your Library
    • Rights & Permissions
  • Collections
  • Help
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us
  • List of Publications
    • IWAP Online
    • Journal of Hydroinformatics
    • Journal of Water and Health
    • Journal of Water and Climate Change
    • Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
    • Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-AQUA
    • H2Open Journal
    • Hydrology Research
    • Water Practice and Technology
    • Water Research
    • Water Policy
    • Water Quality Research Journal
    • Water Science and Technology
    • Water Science and Technology: Water Supply
    • Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
    • Water Intelligence Online
    • Ingeniería del agua
    • IWA Publishing

User menu

  • Log-in
  • Sign-up for alerts

Search

  • Advanced search
  • List of Publications
    • IWAP Online
    • Journal of Hydroinformatics
    • Journal of Water and Health
    • Journal of Water and Climate Change
    • Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
    • Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-AQUA
    • H2Open Journal
    • Hydrology Research
    • Water Practice and Technology
    • Water Research
    • Water Policy
    • Water Quality Research Journal
    • Water Science and Technology
    • Water Science and Technology: Water Supply
    • Journal of Water Sanitation and Hygiene for Development
    • Water Intelligence Online
    • Ingeniería del agua
    • IWA Publishing

Log-in

   

IWAP Online

IWAPonline.com IWAPublishing.com IWA-network.org 

Search All Publications
  • IWA Publishing
    • About IWA Publishing
  • Subscribe
    • Institutional Subscriptions
    • User Licences
    • IP Registration
    • IWA Member Subscriptions
  • Open Access
  • For Authors
    • Publish with Us
    • Instructions for Authors
    • Open Access
    • How to review a paper
    • Rights & Permissions
    • Article Promotion
    • Peerwith
  • For Librarians
    • Usage Statistics
    • Subscriber Services
    • Terms and Conditions
  • For Readers
    • Recommend to Your Library
    • Rights & Permissions
  • Collections
  • Help
    • FAQ
    • Contact Us

Treatment wetlands in decentralised approaches for linking sanitation to energy and food security

Guenter Langergraber, Fabio Masi
Available Online 27 November 2017, wst2017599; DOI: 10.2166/wst.2017.599
Guenter Langergraber
Institute for Sanitary Engineering and Water Pollution Control, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna (BOKU), Muthgasse 18, A-1190, Vienna, Austria
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • For correspondence: guenter.langergraber@boku.ac.at
Fabio Masi
IRIDRA Srl, Via La Marmora 51, Florence 50121, Italy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

Treatment wetlands (TWs) are engineered systems that mimic the processes in natural wetlands with the purpose of treating contaminated water. Being a simple and robust technology, TWs are applied worldwide to treat various types of water. Besides treated water for reuse, TWs can be used in resources-oriented sanitation systems for recovering nutrients and carbon, as well as for growing biomass for energy production. Additionally, TWs provide a large number of ecosystem services. Integrating green infrastructure into urban developments can thus facilitate circular economy approaches and has positive impacts on environment, economy and health.

  • biomass
  • green infrastructure
  • resources recovery
  • treatment wetlands
  • water reuse

Treatment wetlands (TWs), also known as constructed wetlands, are wetlands created specifically for the remediation of contaminated water. Currently, tens of thousands of TWs successfully treat water from a variety of sources including municipal waste, mining and industrial outflows, urban and rural runoff, and groundwater (García et al. 2010; Dotro et al. 2017; Langergraber & Weissenbacher 2017). However, continued misperceptions of appropriate applications and performance efficacy by scientists, engineers and especially regulators responsible for water quality permitting has impeded greater acceptance of this technology and limited usage in many political jurisdictions. The relative youth of wetlands as a treatment technology coupled with the rapid advancement in scientific understanding of underlying processes, physical configuration options and design options is a major contributor to limited but quickly expanding acceptance. Although being a simple and rubost low-cost solution for wastewater (WW) treatment, TWs need to be properly designed and operated to function well. The worldwide lack of treatment for domestic wastewater can be reasonably resolved with the integration of this low-cost technology with the production of biomasses, energy and food, transforming in this way the treatment itself from a cost to an economic occasion, especially for low-income countries (e.g. Zhang et al. 2014).

In resource recovery solutions, segregation and separate collection of the effluents at households is usually applied (Ronteltap & Langergraber 2016). For TWs, this means that different treatment targets apply (compared to treating domestic wastewater). A very interesting factor is that there are specific configurations of wetland systems and combinations of wetland with other technologies available that can better perform or be more efficient in economic terms than others. For example, when energy production is integrated in the water cycle, wetlands can offer great opportunities: a simple first stage French vertical flow (VF) wetland (Dotro et al. 2017) that treats raw wastewater can for instance produce compost and also a nutrient rich effluent that can be directly used for fertigation on a short rotation plantation (SRP). Especially in warm climates, the yields in obtained biomass can be extremely interesting.

Avellan et al. (2017) investigated how biomass from TWs can be utilized in the water-soil-waste nexus. From the plants most commonly used in TWs, Phragmites and Typha have fast growth rates. Less commonly used, but also fast growing, is Arundo donax. At the smaller scales that are now in operation for TWs in most countries, direct combustion and biogas production are the most promising technologies for developing countries. Direct combustion of dry biomass harvested from treatment wetlands can provide more than 10% of the cooking energy needs of a small village.

The integration of nature based retention systems in the urban tissue is enormously enlarging the potential number of applications of wetlands. TWs in future schemes of smart cities will have to be designed following new goals such as (Masi et al. 2017).

  • Water reuse:

    • – Greywater treatment (outdoor, indoor) for local reuse and recreational purposes, possibly as only liquid treatment, while excreta are collected and processed separately;

    • – Rainwater (including first flush) treatment and storage;

    • – Treatment of persistent organic molecules in low concentrations for water reuse;

    • – Polishing of secondary treated WW, as long as these still exist, for reuse.

  • Nutrient and carbon recovery:

    • – TWs as pre-treatment for fertigation (disease vector reduction, separation of liquid and solid phase);

    • – Biomass and fertilizer production from waste activated sludge (as long as such sludge is still produced), digestate or primary sludge in sludge treatment wetlands.

  • Energy production:

    • – Anaerobic reactors for biogas production plus TWs as polishing stage;

    • – TWs for production of energy crops.

  • Ecosystem services:

    • – Multi-purpose TWs for rainwater storage, recreation and wetland ecosystems;

    • – Re-adaptation of ornamental green area in terms of ecosystem services (green roofs, green walls, indoor green areas and walls, parks, permaculture productive areas) comprising organic food production in integrated habitats.

Conclusions

It can be concluded that:

  • the integration of green infrastructure into urban developments is a relevant opportunity for generating circular economy approaches and several positive impacts on environment, economy and health;

  • this intregration process must include the strict collaboration amongst different professionalities, as engineers, chemists, biologists, agronomists, architects and interior designers, urban planners and traffic experts, climatologists, habitat and species biodiversity experts, economists and sociologists.

  • First received 1 October 2017.
  • Accepted in revised form 14 November 2017.
  • © IWA Publishing 2018

REFERENCES

  1. ↵
    1. Avellan C. T.,
    2. Ardakanian R.,
    3. Gremillion P.
    2017 The role of constructed wetlands for biomass production within the water-soil-waste nexus. Water Science & Technology 75 (10), 2237–2245.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    1. Dotro G.,
    2. Langergraber G.,
    3. Molle P.,
    4. Nivala J.,
    5. Puigagut J.,
    6. Stein O. R.,
    7. von Sperling M.
    2017 Treatment Wetlands. Biological Wastewater Treatment Series, Volume 7, IWA Publishing, London, UK. IWA Publishing, London, UK. http://wio.iwaponline.com/content/16/9781780408774 (last visited: 30 October 2017).
  3. ↵
    1. García J.,
    2. Rousseau D.,
    3. Morato J.,
    4. Lesage E. L. S.,
    5. Matamoros V.,
    6. Bayona J.
    2010 Contaminant removal processes in subsurface-flow constructed wetlands: a review. Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology 40 (7), 561–661.
    OpenUrl
  4. ↵
    1. Langergraber G.,
    2. Weissenbacher N.
    2017 Survey on number and size distribution of treatment wetlands in Austria. Water Science & Technology 75 (10), 2309–2315.
    OpenUrl
  5. ↵
    1. Masi F.,
    2. Rizzo A.,
    3. Regelsberger M.
    2017 The role of treatment wetlands in new circular economy, resource oriented, and ecosystem services paradigms. Journal of Environmental Management [In press.].
  6. ↵
    1. Li H.
    1. Ronteltap M.,
    2. Langergraber G.
    2016 Resources-oriented sanitation systems. In: Global Trends & Challenges in Water Science, Research and Management – Global Trends & Challenges in Water Science, Research and Management – A Compendium of hot Topics and Features From IWA Specialist Groups (Li H., ed.). IWA, London, UK, pp.106–110.
  7. ↵
    1. Zhang D. Q.,
    2. Jinadasa K. B. S. N.,
    3. Gersberg R. M.,
    4. Liu Y.,
    5. Ng W. J.,
    6. Tan S. K.
    2014 Application of constructed wetlands for wastewater treatment in developing countries – A review of recent developments (2000–2013). Journal of Environmental Management 141, 116–131.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract
Previous ArticleNext Article
Back to top

JBJS

Current Issue:
  Volume 77, Issue 7

  Table of Contents
  Uncorrected Proofs
  Browse Archive

  ISSN : 0273-1223

Actions

Email

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on IWAP Online.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Treatment wetlands in decentralised approaches for linking sanitation to energy and food security
(Your Name) has sent you a message from IWAP Online
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the IWAP Online web site.
Share
Treatment wetlands in decentralised approaches for linking sanitation to energy and food security
Guenter Langergraber, Fabio Masi
Water Science and Technology Nov 2017, wst2017599; DOI: 10.2166/wst.2017.599
del.icio.us logo Digg logo Reddit logo Technorati logo Twitter logo CiteULike logo Connotea logo Facebook logo Google logo Mendeley logo
Citation Tools
Treatment wetlands in decentralised approaches for linking sanitation to energy and food security
Guenter Langergraber, Fabio Masi
Water Science and Technology Nov 2017, wst2017599; DOI: 10.2166/wst.2017.599

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero

View Full PDF

Save to my folders
Alerts

Please log in to add an alert for this article.

Print
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like

Jump to

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Conclusions
    • REFERENCES
  • Info & Metrics
  • PDF

Related Articles

Cited By...

More in this TOC Section

  • Innovative sanitation approaches could address multiple development challenges
Show more Mini Review

Similar Articles

Keywords

biomass
green infrastructure
resources recovery
treatment wetlands
water reuse
  • Feedback
  • About IWA Publishing
  • Open Access

IWA Publishing
Alliance House
12, Caxton Street
London SW1H 0QS, UK

Tel: +44 (0)20 7654 5500
Fax: +44 (0)20 7654 5555
Remove (0) if calling from outside the UK
iwapublishing.com
Company registered in England no. 3690822

© IWA Publishing | Cookies | Terms & Conditions | Privacy | Site Map