The current paper is aimed at studying the influence of weather conditions on urban water consumption using available continuous flow measurements from existing district metered areas (DMA), belonging to different Portuguese water distribution systems. A three-step methodology was followed: Data processing; DMA segmentation in terms of billed consumption and socio-demographic characteristics; and demand modeling. Cluster analysis was carried out to segment the different DMA with similar billed consumption, and multiple linear regression analysis was used to describe the effect of weather variables (temperature and rainfall) on water consumption. Three well-defined DMA clusters were identified and the respective demand models were obtained for each group. Results have shown that temperature has a significant influence on water consumption, particularly in DMA in which the public billed consumption (29%) and the domestic billed consumption in the third and fourth tariff levels (10.7 and 10.1%, respectively) are relevant. The relationship between consumption and rainfall is not as evident as the relationship with temperature; however, the rainfall variable is equally important in the construction of demand models. These results allow improving of monthly and seasonal network operation, since these allow a more robust profiling of the water uses as well as modeling demand for different weather conditions.

## INTRODUCTION

Water is a natural resource of utmost importance to the prosperity and development of society, with a crucial role in the location and development of communities (OECD 1999). Water management aims at providing the adequate amount of water with adequate quality for various water uses. Particularly in developed societies, water systems have been modified or adapted to fulfill the demands of the water services in the long term (Haasnoot *et al.* 2011).

The understanding of domestic consumption–the most important component of urban water consumption–is important for adequate management of existing water supply systems, for the design of new systems or the expansion of existing sectors, as well as for the establishment of long-term strategies (Silva *et al.* 1995; Rebelo *et al.* 2008; Pullinger *et al.* 2013). Overall, knowledge of the factors that influence domestic consumption is important for efficient planning, operation and management of water supply systems. Domestic water consumption is strongly influenced by economic, socio-demographic and weather conditions, infrastructure characteristics, technological developments and regulation factors (Höglund 1999; Arbués *et al.* 2004; Corbella & Pujol 2009; Loureiro 2010). Weather conditions are one of the most relevant explanatory factors of domestic water consumption (González & Carranza 2003). Temperature and rainfall are the most commonly used weather indicators, given the availability of data. Miaou (1990) suggest that water use can be decomposed into a base use and a seasonal use; the former is primarily indoor use and is not affected by weather conditions, whereas the latter is largely outdoor use and is strongly dependent on weather conditions.

Temperature is a key factor for domestic water consumption, particularly in networks with significant outdoor uses (Cabral 2014). Typically, hotter days are associated with higher water consumption through increased hygiene habits and outdoor uses, such as garden watering and swimming pool filling (Hoffmann *et al.* 2006; Corbella & Pujol 2009). Loh & Coghlan (2003) argued that consumption in outdoor uses is very sensitive to weather conditions. These authors verified that low-rise buildings with high income inhabitants have a higher consumption in the summer, mainly due to outdoor uses.

Miaou (1990) suggested that the effect of rainfall on daily urban water use is both dynamic and state-dependent. Dynamic means that the occurrence of rainfall causes a temporary reduction in seasonal water use that diminishes over time and, eventually, becomes negligible. State-dependent implies that, under the same rainfall conditions, the higher the seasonal water use level is (prior to the occurrence of a rainfall), the greater the rainfall effect that can be expected. The rainfall state-dependent effect has two important implications. Firstly, people respond more to its occurrence than to its amount; in other words, the effect is more psychological than physical (at least in the short-term). Secondly, the rainfall has hardly any effect on consumption when water use is mainly due to indoor uses, which is either a result of low temperature in the winter or of several days of consecutive rainfall. Parandvash & Chang (2016) suggest that precipitation has an impact on daily water consumption in a statistically significant way.

Knowledge of the influence of weather conditions on water consumption is useful to support short, medium and long-term decisions for the efficient use of water and the sustainable management of urban water systems. It is important to understand in which network sectors the urban consumption is more sensitive to weather conditions. For example, the consumption in areas with relevant outdoor uses (e.g. gardens, pools) or in tourist attractions may be more influenced by weather conditions (Gössling *et al.* 2012). This aspect is important to improve the operational management of the network sectors, given the increase of consumption scenarios for increasing temperature.

Additionally, in order to improve water demand management in situations of scarcity and to be able to apply measures to promote the efficient use of water, it is necessary to better understand which water uses are more influenced by weather conditions. This analysis is particularly important in the context of climate change. The increase of the average annual temperature, the changes in spatial and temporal distribution of rainfall and the variations in the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events can generate constraints on water availability and changes in water use (Easterling *et al.* 2000).

Weather conditions have been used in the construction of water demand models in the previous research. Miaou (1990) proposed a new class of urban water demand model with nonlinear climatic effect based on monthly time-series. Martinez-Espineira (2002) calculated and compared short- and long-run price elasticities of residential water demand using annual time-series from Seville, Spain. This author included in the demand model two variables, the average daily maximum temperatures of each month and current level of rainfall, and has taken into consideration the co-integration and error correlation techniques. Babel *et al.* (2007) used the annual time-series of Kathmandu Valley in Nepal to develop a linear, semi-log and log-log models, including the average annual temperature and annual rainfall as explanatory variables.

One of the most important methods to improve network operation is to divide the water distribution system into smaller network units, called district metered areas (DMA), with 500–3,000 service connections, and to install flowmeters to measure the inflow and outflow from these areas (Farley & Trow 2003). Most of the previous studies have used monthly or annual time-series to construct the demand models, considering a larger spatial scale (e.g. city level). Flow time-series with high resolution (15 minutes) at DMA level are used herein. This is important to support network operation (e.g. pump scheduling, tank filling), as the obtained results allow identifying and quantifying in which DMA the influence of weather conditions on urban water consumption is more relevant.

The current research aims to improve the understanding of the influence of weather conditions on water consumption using available flow measurements of Portuguese DMA located in different water distribution systems (WDS). In this study, the term *consumption* refers to all components of urban water consumption (i.e. domestic, non-domestic and leakage), whereas the term *flow data* solely refers to flow measurements in the network. A three-step methodology was applied to determine the DMA clusters and to develop the respective demand models between water consumption and weather variables (i.e. temperature and rainfall).

The main contributions of this research are: (i) the development of an improved methodology to describe the effect of weather conditions on water consumption, using cluster analysis (CA) to segment DMA in terms of billed consumption, obtaining different clusters according to water uses; (ii) the application of this methodology at the operational level (DMA level) and using time-series with high resolution (15 minutes); and (iii) the development, testing and validation of novel demand models between water consumption and weather conditions, taking into consideration the serial correlation of error terms, the autocorrelation and cross-correlation between flow time-series and the logarithm transformation of the models. Results of obtained models contribute to improving the daily operation of the network areas, since these allow profiling of the water uses of each DMA and modeling of water demand for different scenarios of temperature and rainfall. Although the demand models are case-specific, they can be applied to sectors with billed consumption and socio-demographic characteristics similar to the analyzed ones.

## METHODOLOGY

*et al.*(2012), Behboudian

*et al.*(2014) and Lee & Chae (2015)) using different explanatory variables of consumption, but it allows the identification of the network sectors in which the consumption is more sensitive to weather conditions (temperature and rainfall) and quantifying this influence.

In Step 1, available flow measurements from each DMA are collected with either an irregular or regular time-step over one year. The used data processing methodology is the one proposed by Loureiro (2010). Network flow data processing includes descriptive analysis, outlier detection, data combination and data normalization. Descriptive analysis aims at data characterization and at the identification of potential outliers or of less reliable data (Loureiro *et al.* 2015). Data combination includes removing the large consumers and the minimum night consumption (usually associated to water losses). Data normalization consists of converting the flow series into a regular time-step of 15 minutes. Billing, weather and socio-demographic data are also collected with different temporal and spatial scales. This data processing allows representative data at the DMA level to be obtained.

In Step 2, a CA is carried out to segment the different DMA in which the billed consumption characteristics are similar, as well as their type of water uses. Ward's method (Ward 1963) and Euclidean distances with standardized variables are used herein in CA. In this hierarchical method, the number of clusters is defined after the clustering process, based on the linkage distance.

*Y*and .

Different measures of goodness-of-fit should be used to evaluate the fitted regression models, namely, standard deviation/error of the estimator's beta and adjusted r-square . The is a modification of r-square adjusted to the number of existing explanatory variables. It represents the quality of the adjustment: a value close to 1 indicates that the adjustment of the regression is very good and the linear regression can explain most of the variation in the dependent variables. The *p*-value associated to the overall F-test is a measure of model significance, wherein the null hypothesis H_{0}: is rejected when the *p*-value is, for example, less than 0.05.

The variance inflation factor (VIF) is a measure of the degree of multi-collinearity between explanatory variables in a multiple regression model (O'Brien 2007). Multi-collinearity can inflate the variance amongst the variables in the model. These inflated variances are problematic in regression, because some variables add very little or even not new and independent information to the model. A general rule is that the VIF should not exceed 10 (Robinson & Schumacker 2009). This measure is also used in Step 3.

The autocorrelation and cross-correlation of time-series and the serial correlation of error terms are taken into account in the development of the MLR models. The autocorrelation function (ACF) is a measure of how a quantity observed at a given time is related to the same quantity at another time. It measures the degree of resemblance of the signal with itself as time passes, to use signal processing terminology, while the cross-correlation function (CCF) measures how closely two different observations are related to each other at the same or different times (Scargle 1989). In the relationship between two time-series ( and ), the series may be related to past lags of the x-series (Haugh 2010).

The study of the serial correlation of error terms is carried out through the Durbin–Watson test and global validation of linear model assumptions. The Durbin–Watson test computes residual autocorrelations, allowing the independence of error terms to be concluded (Durbin & Watson 1950). The global validation of linear model assumptions included the global stat, skewness, kurtosis, link function and heteroscedasticity tests. All tests show the bootstrapped *p*-values, in which the null hypothesis is not rejected when the *p*-value is higher than 0.05.

### Case study

Analyzed case-studies include DMA from two different WDS from Lisbon and Setubal districts in Portugal. To identify the subset of DMA where temperature and rainfall may have a higher influence on urban water consumption, billing and socio-demographic variables were explored for each DMA according to the criteria described in Table 1. Billing variables include total domestic billed consumption, domestic billed consumption in the third and fourth tariff levels and total public billed consumption. DMA were selected in order to ensure that the main component of urban consumption (Almeida *et al.* 2006) – domestic – is predominant in these network areas. An additional criterion was considered in terms of the proportion of domestic consumption in the higher tariff levels in order to focus the analysis on areas with higher consumption per customer.

Billed and economic parameters . | Description . | Criteria . |
---|---|---|

Domestic billed consumption (%) | Ratio between annual domestic billed consumption and the total annual billed consumption. | >50% |

Domestic billed consumption in the 3rd and 4th tariff levels (%) | Ratio between annual domestic billed consumption in the 3rd and 4th tariff levels and the total annual domestic billed consumption in all tariff levels (1st to 4th tariff levels). According to IRAR (2009), the 3rd tariff level is defined between 15 to 25 m^{3}/month and the 4th tariff level is defined for volumes higher than 25 m^{3}/month. | >5% |

Public billed consumption (%) | Ratio between annual public billed consumption and the total annual billed consumption. | >5% |

Economic mobility index (%) | Ratio between the number of residents employed in the tertiary sector and the number of total residents. Previous theoretical models used the income variable to predict residential water demands. Cole (2004) indicates that higher levels of income can indicate higher living standards, which could imply a higher quantity of water consumption. | >70% |

Billed and economic parameters . | Description . | Criteria . |
---|---|---|

Domestic billed consumption (%) | Ratio between annual domestic billed consumption and the total annual billed consumption. | >50% |

Domestic billed consumption in the 3rd and 4th tariff levels (%) | Ratio between annual domestic billed consumption in the 3rd and 4th tariff levels and the total annual domestic billed consumption in all tariff levels (1st to 4th tariff levels). According to IRAR (2009), the 3rd tariff level is defined between 15 to 25 m^{3}/month and the 4th tariff level is defined for volumes higher than 25 m^{3}/month. | >5% |

Public billed consumption (%) | Ratio between annual public billed consumption and the total annual billed consumption. | >5% |

Economic mobility index (%) | Ratio between the number of residents employed in the tertiary sector and the number of total residents. Previous theoretical models used the income variable to predict residential water demands. Cole (2004) indicates that higher levels of income can indicate higher living standards, which could imply a higher quantity of water consumption. | >70% |

The public billed consumption includes outdoor water uses in fountains, street washing, irrigation and cleaning of sewers (Almeida *et al.* 2006). In this study, this variable also includes consumption in public institutions (e.g. schools, sporting installations), since outdoor uses of these customers (e.g. gardening and swimming pool operation) might also be significant.

Moreover, an additional socio-demographic criterion related to residents that work in the tertiary sector was considered. Workers in the tertiary sector are usually associated with higher incomes, which can be related to a higher consumption and often less conservation attitudes towards the efficient use of water (Loh & Coghlan 2003; Beal & Stewart 2011). For the calculation of the economic mobility index, data from the last census were collected (INE 2012).

The influence of temperature and rainfall on water consumption was studied through the average daily temperature and monthly rainfall as explanatory variables. Temperature data were collected from the available weather database (Weather Underground 2015), which provides the average daily temperature measured at different weather stations. Rainfall data were collected from the Portuguese National Information System of Water Resources (SNIRH 2015), which provides only the monthly rainfall measured at different weather stations in Portugal.

District . | Year . | Temperature (°C) . | Rainfall (mm) . | Average national temperature (°C) . | Year . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

High . | Average . | Low . | High . | Average . | Low . | ||||

Lisbon | 2006 | 25 | 18 | 10 | 2006 | 95 | 2 | 16 | 2006 |

Lisbon | 2007 | 23 | 17 | 11 | 2007 | 36 | 3 | 15 | 2007 |

Setúbal | 2011 | 25 | 19 | 13 | 2011 | 57 | 1 | 16 | 2011 |

District . | Year . | Temperature (°C) . | Rainfall (mm) . | Average national temperature (°C) . | Year . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

High . | Average . | Low . | High . | Average . | Low . | ||||

Lisbon | 2006 | 25 | 18 | 10 | 2006 | 95 | 2 | 16 | 2006 |

Lisbon | 2007 | 23 | 17 | 11 | 2007 | 36 | 3 | 15 | 2007 |

Setúbal | 2011 | 25 | 19 | 13 | 2011 | 57 | 1 | 16 | 2011 |

Each DMA presents different values of consumption and economic parameters (domestic billed consumption, public billed consumption, domestic billed consumption in the third and fourth tariff levels, and economic mobility index); these values belong to different years. The DMA located in Lisbon has flow time-series from 2006 and 2007, however the consumption and economic parameters refer to 2011. In the DMA located in Setúbal the flow time-series and the consumption and economic parameters are from the same year, 2011. Only DMA from well-established urban areas were used, in which changes in terms of buildings, population and family are negligible, allowing the use of the flow time-series and the parameters with different years between them.

## RESULTS

average monthly consumption (L/(customer.month)) considering the annual flow time-series and all weekdays (Figure 5);

average daily consumption (L/(customer.day)) considering the annual flow time-series and only the working days (Figure 6).

The general characteristics of the analyzed clusters are presented in Table 3.

. | Domestic billed consumption (%) . | Domestic billed consumption in the third and fourth tariff levels (%) . | Public billed consumption (%) . |
---|---|---|---|

Cluster 1 | 53 | 21 | 29 |

Cluster 2 | 80 | 67 | 11 |

Cluster 3 | 78 | 20 | 8 |

. | Domestic billed consumption (%) . | Domestic billed consumption in the third and fourth tariff levels (%) . | Public billed consumption (%) . |
---|---|---|---|

Cluster 1 | 53 | 21 | 29 |

Cluster 2 | 80 | 67 | 11 |

Cluster 3 | 78 | 20 | 8 |

Results have shown that consumption increases with the temperature and decreases with the rainfall (Figure 5). The DMA consumption in Cluster 1 is the most affected by the temperature. This cluster is composed of DMA with the highest public billed consumption (almost 30% of total billed consumption) and the lowest domestic billed consumption (ca. 50%). This shows the importance of temperature on non-domestic consumption (mainly, public consumption). Cluster 2 has the largest domestic billed consumption in the third and fourth tariff levels (around 67%); these consumptions are related to outdoor uses during the summer period. Cluster 3 has a low temperature influence on water consumption and is composed of the largest number of DMA. The relationship between consumption and rainfall is not as evident as the relationship between consumption and temperature (for the three clusters), presenting a larger dispersion of data.

The average daily consumption was only studied as a function of the temperature due to the data availability for this temporal scale (Figure 6). Consumption increases with the temperature, and Cluster 1 is the most affected by temperature. Error bars representing the standard deviation of average daily consumption for the different values of temperature were graphically plotted for the three clusters. Additionally, for each cluster, the variability of consumption increases with the average daily consumption, with the highest variability being for Cluster 1.

*et al.*2014). This analysis allows the association of the consumption patterns for water uses through defined clusters. Three types of daily consumption patterns were obtained and are presented in Figure 7, each corresponding to a cluster. Although these patterns include all types of consumption (i.e. domestic, non-domestic and leakage), their daily variation reflects the domestic consumption, which is higher than 50% of the total consumption. This analysis considered only the working days and the winter period, due to a more homogenous consumption in this period of the year.

Clusters were obtained using the consumption parameters of each DMA (billed consumption and consumption tariff levels) and the obtained consumption patterns are similar in each cluster, indicating that the chosen parameters are explanatory of consumption. Cluster 1 reflects a non-domestic pattern due to the high public consumption. This fact contributes to a higher consumption factor in the night period (from 0100 to 0600 h) compared with the other clusters, mainly due to the watering of gardens usually carried out during this period. Clusters 2 and 3 present similar daily domestic patterns, with significant consumption factors in the morning period (from 0700 to 1000 h) and in the dinner period (from 1900 to 2200 h). Cluster 2 presents higher consumptions in these periods and the morning period occurs earlier than in Cluster 3; these consumption patterns are usually from areas where individuals spend most of the time outside home (e.g. at work or school outside their municipalities). In all clusters the median consumption patterns were represented.

Three clusters were identified by CA, and this was followed by the construction of MLR models for each cluster. Obtained statistics and MLR results are presented in Table 4 for average monthly consumption (*Q _{m}*). Presented MLR models were the best-fitted ones after autocorrelation and cross-correlation analysis, and serial correlation of error term tests.

Dependent variable . | Clusters . | Explaining component . | Regression coefficients . | Standard deviation . | p-value (F-test)
. | . | p-value (Durbin‒Watson test)
. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Q, average monthly consumption [l/(customer.month)] _{m} | Cluster 1^{a} (N = 18) | Constant (β_{0}) | 5.632 | 1.071 | 0.000 | 0.93 | 0.962 |

C_{−1} (β_{1}) | 0.378 | 0.120 | |||||

R_{0} (β_{2}) | _{−}0.001 | 0.000 | |||||

T_{0} (β_{3}) | 0.041 | 0.009 | |||||

Cluster 2 (N = 33) | Constant (β_{0}) | 9,838.197 | 2,324.765 | 0.000 | 0.72 | 0.348 | |

C_{−1} (β_{1}) | 0.548 | 0.217 | |||||

T_{−1} (β_{2}) | _{−}204.274 | 178.492 | |||||

R_{0} (β_{3}) | _{−}41.212 | 14.105 | |||||

T_{0} (β_{4}) | 353.398 | 164.221 | |||||

Cluster 3 (N = 48) | Constant (β_{0}) | 4,977.236 | 1,203.076 | 0.000 | 0.60 | 0.188 | |

C_{−1} (β_{1}) | 0.400 | 0.110 | |||||

R_{0} (β_{2}) | _{−}10.690 | 3.601 | |||||

T_{0} (β_{3}) | 179.221 | 46.468 |

Dependent variable . | Clusters . | Explaining component . | Regression coefficients . | Standard deviation . | p-value (F-test)
. | . | p-value (Durbin‒Watson test)
. |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|

Q, average monthly consumption [l/(customer.month)] _{m} | Cluster 1^{a} (N = 18) | Constant (β_{0}) | 5.632 | 1.071 | 0.000 | 0.93 | 0.962 |

C_{−1} (β_{1}) | 0.378 | 0.120 | |||||

R_{0} (β_{2}) | _{−}0.001 | 0.000 | |||||

T_{0} (β_{3}) | 0.041 | 0.009 | |||||

Cluster 2 (N = 33) | Constant (β_{0}) | 9,838.197 | 2,324.765 | 0.000 | 0.72 | 0.348 | |

C_{−1} (β_{1}) | 0.548 | 0.217 | |||||

T_{−1} (β_{2}) | _{−}204.274 | 178.492 | |||||

R_{0} (β_{3}) | _{−}41.212 | 14.105 | |||||

T_{0} (β_{4}) | 353.398 | 164.221 | |||||

Cluster 3 (N = 48) | Constant (β_{0}) | 4,977.236 | 1,203.076 | 0.000 | 0.60 | 0.188 | |

C_{−1} (β_{1}) | 0.400 | 0.110 | |||||

R_{0} (β_{2}) | _{−}10.690 | 3.601 | |||||

T_{0} (β_{3}) | 179.221 | 46.468 |

C_{−1} – average consumption in the previous month (L/(customer.month)); T_{−1} – average temperature in the previous month (°C); T_{0} – average temperature of the current month (°C); R_{0} – rainfall of the current month (mm).

^{a}MLR model with logarithm transformation of the dependent variable (average monthly consumption).

Autocorrelation analysis was developed for the dependent variable (average monthly consumption) for each cluster through the ACF function that analyzes the different consumption lags. It was found that consumption in the current month is dependent on the previous month's consumption in all clusters, and it is represented by the variable C_{−1} in Table 4. The cross-correlation analysis was developed between the dependent variable (average monthly consumption) and each explanatory variable (temperature and rainfall). The CCF function allows the lags (different month's times) of explanatory variables that are more correlated to the dependent variables to be obtained. It was found that consumption in the current month is dependent on the previous month's temperature, only in Cluster 2, and it is represented by the variable T_{−1} in Table 4. The negative value of the T_{−1} variable means that the temperature of the previous month has a negative effect on the monthly consumption. A higher temperature in the previous month will contribute to a lower consumption in the current month, for example in the months of August and September. On the other hand, a lower temperature in the previous month will contribute to a higher consumption in the current month, for example in the months of May and June. Besides the use of C_{−1} and T_{−1} (only in Cluster 2), the variables of rainfall and temperature corresponding to the current month were also used as explanatory variables for all clusters.

A minor logarithmic relationship of the consumption data with temperature was observed for Cluster 1 (see Figure 5(a)); thus, MLR models with logarithmic transformation were constructed for this dependent variable (average monthly consumption). In the other clusters, the best-fitted models corresponded to MLR models without logarithmic transformation.

The study of the serial correlation of error terms was carried out through the Durbin–Watson test and the global validation of linear model assumptions. The *p*-value obtained in the Durbin–Watson test is also presented in Table 4; for the three models, the *p*-value is higher than 0.05, which corresponds to the value at which the null hypothesis is not rejected. Also, in all clusters, the assumptions concerning the global validation of the linear model were satisfied, including the assumptions of global stat, skewness, kurtosis, link function and heteroscedasticity.

Results of the MLR analysis of average monthly consumption (*Q _{m}*) present values relatively high (≥0.60) and approximately null the

*p*-values (overall F-test) for the three clusters. Ninety-three percent of the variations of average monthly consumption in Cluster 1 are explained by the independent variables, since . Consumption in Cluster 3 is characterized by the lowest adjusted r-square , being the cluster with the highest percentage of domestic consumption in the first tariff level associated with indoor uses (water base use), which is very insensitive to weather conditions. As expected, the average monthly consumption increases with the temperature and decreases with the rainfall in all clusters, although with different ratios: Cluster 1 with =

_{−}0.001 for rainfall and = 0.041 for temperature; Cluster 2 with =

_{−}41.212 for rainfall and = 353.398 for temperature; and Cluster 3 with =

_{−}10.69 for rainfall and = 179.221 for temperature.

MLR models have been validated using new DMA for the three clusters. The chosen DMA are from the same network areas, however corresponding to different years from those used to obtain the models. A relative error given by the absolute difference between the real and the estimated value divided by the real value was calculated. A DMA from Cluster 1 has been used to validate the model for December 2013. In Clusters 2 and 3, two DMA of each cluster were selected to validate the respective models for different months and years. Table 5 presents the relative errors, showing that the models have a good prediction performance with a relative error below 8%.

Clusters . | DMA . | Month . | Year . | Relative error (%) . |
---|---|---|---|---|

Cluster 1 | NO_Lis | December | 2013 | 2.5 |

Cluster 2 | SDM_Set | July | 2014 | 2.6 |

VEN_Set | October | 2014 | 0.7 | |

Cluster 3 | FC_Lis | March | 2013 | 7.3 |

CS_Lis | May | 2013 | 0.7 |

Clusters . | DMA . | Month . | Year . | Relative error (%) . |
---|---|---|---|---|

Cluster 1 | NO_Lis | December | 2013 | 2.5 |

Cluster 2 | SDM_Set | July | 2014 | 2.6 |

VEN_Set | October | 2014 | 0.7 | |

Cluster 3 | FC_Lis | March | 2013 | 7.3 |

CS_Lis | May | 2013 | 0.7 |

## CONCLUSIONS

The current research is aimed at studying the influence of weather conditions on water consumption of DMA located in different Portuguese WDS. This allows improving the knowledge of urban water consumption, namely understanding the network sectors in which the urban consumption (domestic and non-domestic) is more sensitive to climate conditions. This aspect is important to improve the operational management of the WDS, given the predicted consumption scenarios for extreme weather events, namely increasing temperature. Additionally, in order to improve water demand management in situations of scarcity and to be able to establish measures to promote the efficient use of water, it is necessary to better understand which water uses are more influenced by weather conditions. The main contributions of this research are: the improved methodology using CA to segment DMA; the application of this methodology using an approach at the DMA level and with high resolution flow time-series (15 minutes); and the development, testing and validation of novel demand models between water consumption and weather variables.

The methodology proposed is a three-step procedure. This methodology allows collecting flow series without outliers and with a regular time-step of 15 minutes, to group different DMA with similar consumption billed characteristics, and to obtain MLR model between the average monthly consumption for the three clusters and weather conditions (temperature and rainfall), taking into consideration the serial correlation of error terms, the autocorrelation and cross-correlation analysis between time-series and the logarithm transformation of the models.

The study of the influence of weather conditions on water consumption was carried out with 10 DMA in the south region of Portugal, selected from a set of 44 DMA. Results have shown that weather conditions, mainly temperature, have a significant influence on public billed consumption and domestic billed consumption in the third and fourth tariff levels. These contribute to the increase in water consumption, mainly the outdoor uses. Three clusters have been analyzed, and demand models for each cluster were developed. Demand models were validated, showing that the models have a good prediction performance with a relative error below 8%. Although the demand models are case-specific, they can be applied to DMA with billed consumption and socio-demographic characteristics similar to the ones analyzed herein.

## ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

The authors would like to thank the Portuguese water utilities that have provided consumption and infrastructure data for their systems.