Abstract
In the current study, an alternative precursor for the production of activated carbon (AC) is introduced using grape wood. The AC structures and functional groups were studied using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR). The efficiency of prepared AC has been investigated in the removal of Reactive Red 2 (RR2) from an aqueous solution. The effect of main variables, namely dye concentration (100–500 mg L−1), contact time (10–90 min), adsorbent dosage (0.25–12.25 g L−1), and initial pH (3–11) have been assessed on the adsorption process in order to find out the optimum conditions. Langmuir, Freundlich, and Temkin adsorption isotherm models were applied to describe the characteristics of adsorption behavior. Kinetic data were fitted to pseudo-first-order, pseudo-second-order, and intra-particle diffusion models. Based on the results, the highest removal efficiency (97.96%) of RR2 dye was obtained at an initial concentration of 100 mg L−1, adsorbent dose of 12.25 g, contact time of 90 min, and pH 3, which indicated a significant sorption efficiency. The rate of the adsorption fitted well to a pseudo-second-order kinetic model (R2 = 0.99). In addition, the Temkin adsorption isotherm model was found to fit the experimental data (R2 = 0.99).
HIGHLIGHTS
To investigate the Reactive Red 2 adsorption using activated carbon from grape wood wastes.
To study the effects of independent variables on the Reactive Red 2 removal using activated carbon.
Graphical Abstract
ABBREVIATIONS
- RSM
response surface methodology
- CCD
central composite design
- C0
initial concentration of dye solution (mg L−1)
- qm
maximum adsorption capacity reflected a complete monolayer (mg g−1) in Langmuir isotherm model
- Ce
dye concentration (mg L−1) at equilibrium
- V
volume of solution (L)
- W
weight of adsorbent (g)
- qe
equilibrium adsorption capacity (mg g)
- k2
the rate constant of pseudo-second-order adsorption (g mg−1 min−1)
- β0
offset term
- KF
isotherm constant indicates the capacity parameter (mg g−1) related to the intensity of the adsorption
- βii
squared effect
- FTIR
Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy
- NaOH
sodium hydroxide
- βij
interaction effect
- R2
correlation coefficient
- %R
percentage of adsorption process efficiency
- b
Langmuir constant or adsorption equilibrium constant (L mg−1) that is related to the apparent energy of sorption
- Y
predicted response
- n
Freundlich constant
- AC
activated carbon
- RR2
Reactive Red 2
- k1
the equilibrium rate constant of pseudo-first-order adsorption (g g−1 min−1)
- βi
linear effect
- KL
Langmuir constant or adsorption equilibrium constant (L mg−1) that is related to the apparent energy of sorption
- SEM
scanning electron microscope
- H3PO4
phosphoric acid
- H2SO4
sulfuric acid
INTRODUCTION
Activated carbon (AC) or activated charcoal is a common term used to describe carbon-based materials (González-García 2018; Gao et al. 2020). In fact, AC is a porous carbonaceous solid material that is produced from carbon-rich raw materials such as coal or biomass through thermal or thermochemical processes (Ukanwa et al. 2019). Carbon structures contain the main functional groups such as quinone, phenol, lactone, carbonyl, and carboxyl that are responsible for adsorbing contaminants. Nitrogen, hydrogen, sulfur, and oxygen are also present in the form of functional groups or chemical atoms in the AC structure (Heidarinejad et al. 2020; Jha et al. 2021). Hydrogen, oxygen, and other heteroatoms in the raw materials or chemicals used in the activation are attached to the ends and corners of the crystal structure to form various functional groups on the AC surface (Demiral et al. 2021). Consequently, AC has permanent applications in water treatment and desalination, wastewater treatment, and air purification due to its unique characteristics such as its internal porous structure (consisting of pores having diverse size distribution) and high surface area (Heidarinejad et al. 2020). The results of various studies show that AC has a significant effect in removing dyes, solvents, heavy metal ions, pesticides, pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) as well as organic pollutants from water and wastewater (Wong et al. 2018). Among the pollutants, dyes are used in large quantities in various industries such as textiles, leather, cosmetics, paper, printing, plastics, medicine, food, etc (Vishani & Shrivastav 2022). Dyes are toxic and dangerous for aqueous circumstances and live organisms, which are visible and detectable in small amounts (below 1 ppm) and influence the water environment considerably (Cherifi et al. 2013). The dyes prevent sunlight penetration into the water, reduce photosynthesis and change the solubility of gases in the water (Ali et al. 2017). Dyes can be divided into groups of reactive, acidic, direct, cationic, dispersed, and vat dyes based on their characteristics and application. Among the various dyes, reactive dyes are one of the most commonly used synthetic dyes due to their stability, high solubility, high dye variety, and low price, which are widely used for dyeing cotton and other cellulosic fibers, nylon, and wool (Mousavi et al. 2021). Reactive Red 2 (RR2) represents one of the many types of reactive azo dyes shortly named RR2. RR2 dye is a covalent and strongly bonded compound, thus naturally difficult to disintegrate (Mendonça et al. 2019). This dye is widely used for dyeing cellulosic fibers in the textile industry. On the other hand, only 60–70% of the reactive dye reacts with the fibers during the dyeing process, and the remainder is hydrolyzed and released into the environment (Maas & Chaudhari 2005).
Currently, the demand for AC is increasing every year, and based on forecasts, the market growth is estimated at 4.6% per year. Also, according to published statistics, the global AC market is worth several billion dollars annually (Ukanwa et al. 2019; Lotfy & Roubík 2021). However, due to the high cost of importing AC in developing countries, researchers are trying to make AC from cheap materials. The production of AC from agricultural wastes cause to reduce costs and makes it more environmentally friendly (Selvanathan et al. 2015). Therefore, in recent years, there has been a growing interest in the production of ACs from agricultural by-products and residual wastes. Using the produced agriculture by-products as a starting material for the production of AC as an efficient adsorbent adds value to the harvested crops (Jjagwe et al. 2021). Agricultural by-products can be generally classified into two groups of hard and soft agricultural by-products. Hard agricultural by-products include hard, dense residues that are not easily compressed, such as wood, apricots, pecan or walnut shells, and the stones of dates, or cherries. Also, the second group includes soft and compressible agricultural by-products with low density, such as peanut shells, rice husk, soybean shells, sugarcane bagasse, etc. (Paraskeva et al. 2008). The main components of woody agricultural residues are similar to other lignocellulosic materials, mainly composed of polysaccharides such as 40–50% cellulose, 20–30% hemicellulose, 20–25% lignin, and 1–5% ash which makes them an attractive source for AC production (Lopes & Astruc 2021). In fact, agricultural wastes due to availability, carbonaceous nature, low inorganic content, high volatile matter content, high density, low degradation upon storage, the potential for activation, having micro-structures within itself, and producing high yield when activated are the most suitable for producing AC (Lotfy & Roubík 2021; Jjagwe et al. 2021). In this regard, in order to reduce the waste of horticultural products, reduce the overall costs of water and sewage treatment (through reducing the import of chemicals) and create income for poor communities, grape wood waste was used to produce active carbon. Therefore, the main goal of this article was to explain the adsorption mechanism through experimental and theoretical studies and as a result to provide new interpretations of the removal of RR2 at the molecular level of the adsorbent. Also, the central composite design (CCD) based on response surface methodology (RSM) was used to obtain a possible correlation with the results of adsorbent characterization, their adsorption properties, and dye adsorption mechanism. Overall, the integrated analysis of experimental and theoretical findings helps to obtain new insights into the adsorption of RR2 dye using AC prepared from grape wood.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals and reagents
RR2 with 98% purity (Merck Company, Germany) has been used for preparing stoke solution, 1,000 mg L−1 of RR2 was dissolved in 1 L of distilled water. The RR2 specification is shown in Table 1 (Hameed & Ismail 2018). The chemical activation of the adsorbent was carried out by using 85% phosphoric acid (H3PO4). In this experiment, sulfuric acid (98%) and sodium hydroxide (Merck, Germany) were used to adjust the pH. The RR2, sodium hydroxide (NaOH), sulfuric acid (H2SO4), and phosphoric acid were all analytical grades and used without further purification.
Characteristics . | Values . |
---|---|
Molecular formula | C19H10Cl2N6Na2O7S2 |
max (nm) | 540 |
Molecular weight (MW) | 615.33 g/mol |
Chemical structure |
Characteristics . | Values . |
---|---|
Molecular formula | C19H10Cl2N6Na2O7S2 |
max (nm) | 540 |
Molecular weight (MW) | 615.33 g/mol |
Chemical structure |
Synthesis of AC
Physicochemical characterization
Microscopic and chemical properties of prepared AC were studied by scanning electron microscope (SEM) and Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) methods. Microscopic images of AC (adsorbent) were obtained by scanning electron microscope (Jeol JSM 840A, Japan). Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used to determine the vibrational frequency changes in the functional groups of the AC. The spectra were collected by FTIR (ShimaDZU IRPrestige, Japan model) within the range of wave number of 400–4,000 cm−1.
Central composite design
Parameter name . | Unit . | Symbols . | Low . | High . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Contact time | min | X1 | 10 | 90 |
pH | – | X2 | 3 | 11 |
Adsorbent dosage | g | X3 | 0.25 | 12.25 |
Initial concentration | mg L−1 | X4 | 100 | 500 |
Parameter name . | Unit . | Symbols . | Low . | High . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Contact time | min | X1 | 10 | 90 |
pH | – | X2 | 3 | 11 |
Adsorbent dosage | g | X3 | 0.25 | 12.25 |
Initial concentration | mg L−1 | X4 | 100 | 500 |
Run . | Time . | pH . | Dosage . | Initial concentration . | C1 . | R% . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 90 | 3 | 0.25 | 100 | 71.33 | 28.66 |
2 | 10 | 11 | 0.25 | 100 | 88.66 | 11.33 |
3 | 10 | 3 | 0.25 | 100 | 85.66 | 14.33 |
4 | 90 | 11 | 0.25 | 100 | 77 | 23 |
5 | 90 | 11 | 12.25 | 100 | 4.66 | 95.33 |
6 | 90 | 3 | 12.25 | 100 | 2.33 | 97.66 |
7 | 10 | 11 | 12.25 | 100 | 62.66 | 37.33 |
8 | 10 | 3 | 12.25 | 100 | 58 | 42 |
9 | 50 | 7 | 6.25 | 200 | 39.33 | 80.33 |
10 | 50 | 9 | 6.25 | 300 | 134 | 55.33 |
11 | 30 | 7 | 6.25 | 300 | 158.33 | 47.1 |
12 | 50 | 5 | 6.25 | 300 | 110 | 63.4 |
13 | 50 | 7 | 6.25 | 300 | 125 | 58.3 |
14 | 50 | 7 | 6.25 | 300 | 127 | 57.6 |
15 | 50 | 7 | 6.25 | 300 | 121 | 59.6 |
16 | 50 | 7 | 3.25 | 300 | 175 | 41.6 |
17 | 50 | 7 | 3.25 | 300 | 177 | 41 |
18 | 50 | 7 | 3.25 | 300 | 174 | 42 |
19 | 50 | 7 | 9.25 | 300 | 95 | 68.33 |
20 | 50 | 7 | 6.25 | 300 | 124.33 | 58.5 |
21 | 70 | 7 | 6.25 | 300 | 107.66 | 64 |
22 | 50 | 7 | 6.25 | 400 | 140 | 65 |
23 | 10 | 11 | 0.25 | 500 | 500 | 0 |
24 | 10 | 3 | 0.25 | 500 | 500 | 0 |
25 | 90 | 3 | 12.25 | 500 | 207 | 58.6 |
26 | 90 | 11 | 0.25 | 500 | 500 | 0 |
27 | 10 | 11 | 12.25 | 500 | 451.66 | 9.66 |
28 | 10 | 3 | 12.25 | 500 | 438 | 12.4 |
29 | 90 | 11 | 12.25 | 500 | 221.66 | 55.66 |
30 | 90 | 3 | 0.25 | 500 | 500 | 0 |
Run . | Time . | pH . | Dosage . | Initial concentration . | C1 . | R% . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 90 | 3 | 0.25 | 100 | 71.33 | 28.66 |
2 | 10 | 11 | 0.25 | 100 | 88.66 | 11.33 |
3 | 10 | 3 | 0.25 | 100 | 85.66 | 14.33 |
4 | 90 | 11 | 0.25 | 100 | 77 | 23 |
5 | 90 | 11 | 12.25 | 100 | 4.66 | 95.33 |
6 | 90 | 3 | 12.25 | 100 | 2.33 | 97.66 |
7 | 10 | 11 | 12.25 | 100 | 62.66 | 37.33 |
8 | 10 | 3 | 12.25 | 100 | 58 | 42 |
9 | 50 | 7 | 6.25 | 200 | 39.33 | 80.33 |
10 | 50 | 9 | 6.25 | 300 | 134 | 55.33 |
11 | 30 | 7 | 6.25 | 300 | 158.33 | 47.1 |
12 | 50 | 5 | 6.25 | 300 | 110 | 63.4 |
13 | 50 | 7 | 6.25 | 300 | 125 | 58.3 |
14 | 50 | 7 | 6.25 | 300 | 127 | 57.6 |
15 | 50 | 7 | 6.25 | 300 | 121 | 59.6 |
16 | 50 | 7 | 3.25 | 300 | 175 | 41.6 |
17 | 50 | 7 | 3.25 | 300 | 177 | 41 |
18 | 50 | 7 | 3.25 | 300 | 174 | 42 |
19 | 50 | 7 | 9.25 | 300 | 95 | 68.33 |
20 | 50 | 7 | 6.25 | 300 | 124.33 | 58.5 |
21 | 70 | 7 | 6.25 | 300 | 107.66 | 64 |
22 | 50 | 7 | 6.25 | 400 | 140 | 65 |
23 | 10 | 11 | 0.25 | 500 | 500 | 0 |
24 | 10 | 3 | 0.25 | 500 | 500 | 0 |
25 | 90 | 3 | 12.25 | 500 | 207 | 58.6 |
26 | 90 | 11 | 0.25 | 500 | 500 | 0 |
27 | 10 | 11 | 12.25 | 500 | 451.66 | 9.66 |
28 | 10 | 3 | 12.25 | 500 | 438 | 12.4 |
29 | 90 | 11 | 12.25 | 500 | 221.66 | 55.66 |
30 | 90 | 3 | 0.25 | 500 | 500 | 0 |
Experimental procedure
RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Morphology of the prepared AC
RSM approach and statistical analysis
In order to optimize the chosen adsorption factors, a CCD was applied. The design of experimental (DOE) software (version 8) was employed to investigate how pH, the amount of adsorbent, initial concentration, and the time of RR2 dye affect the responses. F-test was done in order to examine the statistical model and to find out the mathematical relationship between responses and process parameters including contact time (X1), pH (X2), adsorbent dosage (X3), and the initial concentration of RR2 (X4). The regression model was also examined for its significance and performance and it was done with the analysis of variance ANOVA for the adsorption of RR2 dye using AC. The ANOVA results for the adsorption of RR2 dye are shown in Table 4. The F-value of the model (156.90) indicates that the model has a significant level. Only 0.01% of the ‘F-value of model’ is likely to be due to noise. P-value is used to determine the significance of each parameter. The amounts of Prob > F when they are lower than 0.05 reveal that the model terms are acceptable for the adsorption of RR2 dye and that the parameters or their interactions are statistically significant. When they are more than 0.5 and are not significant, they reveal that the quadratic model is proper for this research. As shown in Table 4, the P-values of X1, X2, X3, X4, X1 × 3, and X3 × 4 are less than 0.05, indicating a significant effect of these variables on RR2 removal. Adsorbent dose and contact time have the greatest effect on RR2 adsorption. Pred R2 and Adj R2 for RR2 dye removal are 0.95 and 0.96, respectively, which confirms that there is a good match between predicted data and experimental data. The R2 (Adj) and R2 (pred) should be within approximately 0.2 of each other to be in reasonable agreement (Mousavi et al. 2017).
Source . | Sum of squares . | df . | Mean square . | F-value . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 65,602.65 | 14 | 4,685.90 | 156.90 | <0.0001 |
X1 | 10,783.36 | 1 | 10,783.36 | 361.06 | <0.0001 |
X2 | 382.50 | 1 | 382.50 | 12.81 | 0.0007 |
X3 | 22,408.69 | 1 | 22,408.69 | 750.32 | <0.0001 |
X4 | 7,477.79 | 1 | 7,477.79 | 250.38 | <0.0001 |
X1 X2 | 27.45 | 1 | 27.45 | 0.92 | 0.3414 |
X1 X3 | 7,161.41 | 1 | 7,161.41 | 239.79 | <0.0001 |
X1 X4 | 113.78 | 1 | 113.78 | 3.81 | 0.0554 |
X2X3 | 16.69 | 1 | 16.69 | 0.56 | 0.4576 |
X2 X4 | 2.57 | 1 | 2.57 | 0.086 | 0.7704 |
X3 X4 | 458.19 | 1 | 458.19 | 15.34 | 0.0002 |
361.09 | 1 | 361.09 | 12.09 | 0.0009 | |
361.09 | 1 | 149.34 | 5.00 | 0.0289 | |
382.89 | 1 | 382.89 | 12.82 | 0.0007 | |
854.06 | 1 | 854.06 | 28.60 | <0.0001 | |
Residual | 1,881.53 | 63 | 29.87 | ||
Lack of fit | 416.33 | 10 | 41.63 | 1.51 | 0.1633 |
Pure error | 1,465.21 | 53 | 27.65 | ||
Cor. total | 67,484.18 | 77 | |||
Std. dev. | 5.46 | ||||
Mean | 42.29 | ||||
C.V.% | 12.92 | ||||
Adeq Precision | 42.651 |
Source . | Sum of squares . | df . | Mean square . | F-value . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Model | 65,602.65 | 14 | 4,685.90 | 156.90 | <0.0001 |
X1 | 10,783.36 | 1 | 10,783.36 | 361.06 | <0.0001 |
X2 | 382.50 | 1 | 382.50 | 12.81 | 0.0007 |
X3 | 22,408.69 | 1 | 22,408.69 | 750.32 | <0.0001 |
X4 | 7,477.79 | 1 | 7,477.79 | 250.38 | <0.0001 |
X1 X2 | 27.45 | 1 | 27.45 | 0.92 | 0.3414 |
X1 X3 | 7,161.41 | 1 | 7,161.41 | 239.79 | <0.0001 |
X1 X4 | 113.78 | 1 | 113.78 | 3.81 | 0.0554 |
X2X3 | 16.69 | 1 | 16.69 | 0.56 | 0.4576 |
X2 X4 | 2.57 | 1 | 2.57 | 0.086 | 0.7704 |
X3 X4 | 458.19 | 1 | 458.19 | 15.34 | 0.0002 |
361.09 | 1 | 361.09 | 12.09 | 0.0009 | |
361.09 | 1 | 149.34 | 5.00 | 0.0289 | |
382.89 | 1 | 382.89 | 12.82 | 0.0007 | |
854.06 | 1 | 854.06 | 28.60 | <0.0001 | |
Residual | 1,881.53 | 63 | 29.87 | ||
Lack of fit | 416.33 | 10 | 41.63 | 1.51 | 0.1633 |
Pure error | 1,465.21 | 53 | 27.65 | ||
Cor. total | 67,484.18 | 77 | |||
Std. dev. | 5.46 | ||||
Mean | 42.29 | ||||
C.V.% | 12.92 | ||||
Adeq Precision | 42.651 |
There is sufficient accuracy in comparing the range of the estimated amounts at the design points to the average estimation error. The coefficient of variation (CV) is a factor that expresses the standard deviation as the mean's percentage. Those amounts of CV that are lower, are more reproducible. Those amounts of CV that are lower are more reproducible. In the research, the amount of CV (CV% RR2: 12.92) was inside the approvable limit which was between 0.5 and 13.5%. The lack of fit value 416.33 is not significant and confirms that the model is adequate. Adequate precision measured the signal-to-noise ratio and a value of this parameter greater than 4 is generally essential.
Effect of contact time and initial pH
One of the important and effective factors in the adsorption process is the duration time of interaction between the adsorbent surface and the contaminant (e.g. RR2 dye), which has an effective role in the kinetics and speed of the adsorption process (Foroutan et al. 2021). The contact time between adsorbent and adsorbent material is significantly affected the dye removal efficiency (Mousavi et al. 2021). It is essential to evaluate the effect of contact time required to reach equilibrium for designing batch adsorption experiments. Therefore, the effect of contact time on the adsorption of RR2 dye was investigated. The data indicate that the adsorption capacity and percentage removal of RR2 dye go on increasing with the increase of contact time and the maximum value of RR2 adsorption is about 97.96% after 90 min. Figure 4 shows that the rate of adsorption of RR2 is fast initially and then becomes slower and dye adsorption equilibrium has been attained. As initially, the whole of the surface is free for adsorption. But with an increase of contact time, more and more RR2 dye particles get adsorbed over the surface and the free surface for adsorption decreases hence the rate of adsorption also decreases. In fact, the mechanism of RR2 dye removal by the adsorbent includes (1) migration of the RR2 dye from the bulk of the solution to the surface of the adsorbent, (2) diffusion of the RR2 dye through the boundary layer to the surface of the adsorbent, (3) intraparticle diffusion of the RR2 dye in the internal pores of the adsorbent particle. In addition, the rate of adsorption and the increase in contact time can affect the resistance of the boundary layer (Kaur & Kaur 2014). These results were in agreement with the study carried out by Almasi et al. (2017) which used walnut shells to prepare AC; they found that the contact time has significant effects on the removal of RR2 dye (Almasi et al. 2017).
Effect of dye concentration and adsorbent dosage
One of the important and influencing parameters on absorption performance is the adsorbent dose. The influence of adsorbent dose in the adsorption of RR2 dye was studied to obtain the most appropriate amount of adsorbent at various RR2 dye concentrations (Kuang et al. 2020). In order to determine the effect of adsorbent dosage on the adsorption process, 0.25–12.25 g L−1 adsorbent was used for adsorption experiments. From Figure 5, it was evident that the removal of RR2 dye increased with increasing adsorbent dose. In fact, with increasing the adsorbent dose, the access of dye to the adsorbent surface and active sites on the adsorbent surface increases (Abechi et al. 2011). This trend continues until all the dye molecules absorb on the adsorbent active sites (Sartape et al. 2017). A similar trend was found by Mousavi et al. (2021) in the adsorption of RR2 dye onto grape wood waste. In this study, the activating chemical substance sulfuric acid was used for the chemical preparation of AC. According to the results of this study, the highest adsorption rate was obtained in 12.25 g L−1 of AC which was 96.83% (Mousavi et al. 2021). Therefore, it can be concluded that the use of phosphoric acid as an activating agent leads to the improvement of the performance of AC in the removal of dye.
Equilibrium isotherms
Adsorption isotherms describe the relationship between the amount of adsorbed dye on the adsorbent and the final dye concentration in the solution. Experimental results have been analyzed using three two-parameter isotherm models including Freundlich, Langmuir, and Tempkin (Tosun 2012).
Langmuir adsorption isotherm
Isotherm . | Langmuir . | Freundlich . | Temkin . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter . | R2 . | qm . | K1 . | R2 . | Kf . | 1/n . | R2 . | B . |
Value | 0.91 | 33 | 0.0007 | 0.96 | 8.51 | 0.66 | 0.99 | 0.37 |
Isotherm . | Langmuir . | Freundlich . | Temkin . | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Parameter . | R2 . | qm . | K1 . | R2 . | Kf . | 1/n . | R2 . | B . |
Value | 0.91 | 33 | 0.0007 | 0.96 | 8.51 | 0.66 | 0.99 | 0.37 |
where: C0 is the initial concentration; KL is the constant related to the energy of adsorption (Langmuir Constant).
RL value indicates the adsorption nature to be either unfavorable if RL > 1, linear if RL = 1, favorable if 0 < RL < 1, and irreversible if RL = 0. From the data calculated in Table 3, the RL is greater than 0 but less than 1 indicating that Langmuir isotherm is favorable (Selvam et al. 2021).
Freundlich adsorption isotherm
The Freundlich isotherm constants Kf and 1/n can be reported based on the plot of lnqe versus lnCe, which has been presented in Figure 6. In the adsorption process, the magnitude of the exponent, 1/n indicates the favorability of adsorption. If the values are 1⁄n < 1, it indicates that with the appearance of new adsorption sites, the type of isotherm to be required, the adsorption intensity, and the adsorption capacity increase. On the other hand, if it is 1⁄n > 1, it indicates the adsorption bond weakens, which reduces the dye adsorption capacity (Gholamiyan et al. 2020).
Tempkin adsorption isotherm
Kinetic study
Kinetic models . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pseudo-first-order . | Pseudo-second-order . | Intraparticle diffusion . | |||||
K1 . | qe . | R2 . | K2 . | qe . | R2 . | Kid . | R2 . |
0.04 | 870.96 | 0.75 | 0.009 | 4.08 | 0.99 | 354.88 | 0.97 |
Kinetic models . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pseudo-first-order . | Pseudo-second-order . | Intraparticle diffusion . | |||||
K1 . | qe . | R2 . | K2 . | qe . | R2 . | Kid . | R2 . |
0.04 | 870.96 | 0.75 | 0.009 | 4.08 | 0.99 | 354.88 | 0.97 |
The pseudo-first-order model
The pseudo-second-order model
Intraparticle diffusion model
CONCLUSION
An AC was prepared from grape wood waste and used for the removal of RR2 from aqueous solutions. The AC was prepared using a chemical activation method with phosphoric acid as the activating agent. The prepared AC was characterized using different types of analytical techniques such as SEM and FTIR analysis. Batch adsorption tests demonstrate that the adsorption is affected by various conditions, such as initial pH, adsorbent dosage, contact time, and initial dye concentration. From the present study, it can be seen that the AC obtained from grape wood wastes can be used effectively for the removal of the RR2 dye from aqueous solutions. Using the Design-Expert software, the optimum parameter conditions of 100 mg L−1 of initial RR2 concentration, 90 min of contact time, 12.25 g L−1 of adsorbent dose, and pH of 3 were determined. This adsorbent was able to remove up to 97.96% of RR2 dye from solutions whose initial concentration varied between 100 and 500 mg L−1. The experimental data follow the Temkin isotherm and pseudo-second-order models. Finally, the results support the ability of grape wood to be a promising precursor for production of highly porous AC suitable for the removal of azo dyes (e.g. RR2). Overall, these experimental and theoretical results provided new insights into the RR2 dye adsorption mechanism.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The authors gratefully acknowledge the Research Council of Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences for the financial support through grant number 50002046.
DECLARATION OF COMPETING INTEREST
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.