The demand for water resources has increased due to population growth and the effects of cyclical droughts on irrigated agriculture. Due to these current circumstances, there is an imbalance between the limited supply of water and the rising demand for water. According to this perspective, accurate data on the spatial and temporal patterns of stockholder water demand can only be obtained through effective water planning and management. Geographic information system (GIS) mapping and smart metering are being used to implement intelligent water supply systems for dependable water supply management. In water supply systems, GIS models aid in data comprehension, analysis, and querying using advanced technologies that can significantly enhance work in the field of urban planning.

  • GIS for holistic water system management.

  • Enable utility with a modern spatial data platform.

Water scarcity is one of the major issues faced in developing nations like India. The major objective is to make better-quality sources of drinking water available to the populace. For the various development endeavours and for the continuation of life, water is the fundamental basis of life. In order to meet the constant increase in demand, it is important to use water resources methodically, consistently, and wisely in the real world. Due to rising population and resource demands, water is now in short supply in many parts of the world. Water pollution has exacerbated the issue. India is experiencing a freshwater shortage as a result of ineffective management of the nation's water resources and environmental damage. Many regions of India are suffering from a freshwater shortage. However, its size and intensity vary according to the season. A supply check is necessary in order to maintain the water's quality.

Effective planning and decision-making at various levels are essential when resources are scarce. In today's high-tech world, gathering and combining various pieces of information into a usable format is essential for effective decision-making. A geographic information system (GIS) enables users to bring all types of information based on the geographic and locational components of the data. GIS enables you to perform previously unachievable tasks such as making maps, integrating data, visualising scenarios, resolving difficult issues, outlining compelling arguments, and coming up with workable solutions. Using the threshold values of various groundwater quality parameters, the groundwater quality index can be easily calculated, and the results are simple to understand.

However, one of the major issues with the traditional Water Quality Indices (WQIs) (for both surface water and groundwater) is that they fail to deal with the uncertainty and subjectivity that are inherent in the assessment of environmental problems (Silvert 2000), especially while classifying water quality near the parameter-threshold boundary. To overcome this subjectivity and to incorporate environmental uncertainty in the groundwater quality evaluation process, the application of artificial intelligence (AI)-based computational methods is highly recommended (Maiti et al. 2013; Patki et al. 2015; Bagherzadeh et al. 2018; Salari et al. 2018). The available AI methods can be classified into two broad categories: (a) symbolic AI, and (b) computational AI. The former mainly deals with the development of a knowledge-based system, while the latter deals with the development of a behavior-based system (Chau 2006). Computational AI includes neural networks, genetic algorithm, fuzzy systems, etc. Among various computational AI methods, fuzzy logic (FL) is extensively used to deal with complex water-related environmental problems (McKone & Deshpande 2005; Ghosh & Mujumdar 2006), owing to its capability to deal with non-linearity and uncertainty involved in environmental systems (Chanapathi et al. 2019). In addition to this, FL serves as an effective tool for conveying the results to the public and beneficiaries in a much more understandable linguistic format (Li et al. 2018).

It displays power system characteristics as spatial coordinates. Distribution network information is divided into two categories: static data and dynamic data. Dynamic data are instantaneous information of voltage, current, reactive power, active power, power factor, etc., which can be retrieved using various metering devices such as advanced metering infrastructure (AMI), fast recorders, and data loggers. Static data includes information about poles, transformers, switchgear, etc., which can be retrieved using a global positioning system.

Rajendran et al. (2019) deal with the fundamental geochemical analysis of groundwater at specific locations using statistical and/or graphical methods. These studies also highlight the need for an effective methodology to evaluate groundwater quality on a larger scale. More than that, GIS makes it possible to model scenarios to test various hypotheses and visually identify results to find/identify the outcome that meets the needs of the stakeholders. GIS and related technologies are now acknowledged as helpful tools for natural resource inventorying studies and management due to their capacity to combine geographically referenced data from various subject areas to aid in the processing, interpretation, and analysis of such data.

Geographic information systems

GIS definition: A computer-based system for storing and modifying geographic data. ‘An organised collection of database, application, hardware, software, and trained manpower capable of capturing, manipulating, managing, and analysing the spatial reference database and production of output both in tabular and map form’ is a commonly used definition of GIS. A more general definition of GIS is a tool that enables users to edit data, create interactive queries, and analyse spatial data.

Benefits of GIS over other information systems: The main purposes of GIS are decision-making and question-answering. In order to manage geographic data, a GIS, like other information systems, offers the following four sets of capabilities: (i) input, (ii) data management, (iii) manipulation and analysis, and (iv) output.

The collection, archiving, and analysis of objects and phenomena where geographic location is a significant characteristic or essential to analysis are other areas where GIS is designed for use. The distinctive capabilities of GIS are spatial searching and the overlay of (map) layers. For instance, a GIS can combine maps of crop potential and ground/surface water conditions to create a map of crop/land suitability on a temporal and spatial basis. GIS is a cutting-edge and excellent planning tool for resource managers and decision makers because real-world situations are complex (for example, in agriculture, data on land, soil, crop, climate, hydrology, forestry, livestock, fisheries, and social and economic parameters are required for decision-making), and physical computing capacity to manipulate data is low and time-consuming. Thus, the configuration of modern information technology revolves around GIS.

Major GIS tasks: Six key types of tasks are carried out by GIS

  • Data input: Conversion of paper maps to digital format, vector processing, and image classification.

  • Manipulation: Prior to integration, all of the information must be converted to the same resolution scale.

  • The spatial and attribute databases are used in management.

  • Query and viewing: Once the database is ready, users can use GIS to perform any query on the data, such as finding out where soils with the land types MHL and clay-textured soils are located.

  • Analysis: GIS has a wide range of effective tools for creating ‘what-if’ scenarios.

  • Visualisation and printing: Creating maps, legends, symbols, and other related materials, as well as providing printers with the ability to print them.

GIS mapping's function in water supply management

GIS mapping is crucial for effectively managing water supply systems. In order to ensure a dependable water supply network, GIS assists in strategically positioning and optimising the placement of reservoirs, treatment facilities, pumping stations, and pipelines. It aids in the evaluation of water resources by revealing information about the sustainability, quality, and availability of those resources by analysing and mapping potential sources, such as rivers, lakes, and groundwater. Figure 1 shows the GIS mapping for the water management of Tirupur Town, South India.
Figure 1

Key map of GIS in water supply management for Tirupur town, South India.

Figure 1

Key map of GIS in water supply management for Tirupur town, South India.

Close modal

GIS also allows for thorough infrastructure management and makes it simpler to monitor and maintain infrastructure in real time by mapping the entire water network, including pipes, valves, and storage facilities. As a result, there is less waste and better resource allocation. It also supports the analysis of consumption patterns, distribution optimisation, and demand understanding across various regions. By identifying affected areas and planning urgent measures, GIS facilitates quick response during emergencies or disasters. As a result, it aids in the effective and sustainable management of water supply systems for communities. It also aids in data integration, visualisation, future planning, and environmental impact assessment.

A modern method of observing and managing water use in communities is the AMI in the water supply. To improve the effectiveness and accuracy of water metering, it is necessary to integrate cutting-edge technologies such as smart meters, communication networks, and data analytics. On each individual water connection, smart meters are installed, and they can monitor water usage frequently or in real time. These devices enable automated data collection and transmission to centralised data repositories, which helps utilities better track usage patterns, identify leaks, and manage billing.

The ability of AMI to deliver real-time and nearly real-time data on water consumption is its main advantage. Utilities are better able to spot unusual usage patterns, potential leaks, and unauthorised usage by looking at consumption patterns and trends. Water utilities can take quick action to reduce water losses and boost system effectiveness thanks to early leak detection. By giving customers usage-specific data, improving customer satisfaction, and encouraging a culture of water conservation, AMI also enables more accurate and transparent billing based on actual consumption.

AMI also supports two-way communication, which enables utilities to remotely control and manage meters, create alerts, and alter prices in response to demand peaks or other circumstances. In order to encourage customers to reduce their water use during peak hours, utilities can use demand-based pricing strategies. AMI in water supply ultimately plays a critical role in promoting sustainable water management, reducing water waste, and guaranteeing a consistent water supply to communities while providing utilities and customers with useful information and data.

GIS and SMI integration for water supply optimisation

Integrating GIS and smart metering infrastructure (SMI) into water supply systems is a practical way to improve water management. For organising, analysing, and visualising geographic data about demand zones, natural water sources, and water infrastructure, GIS provides a spatial framework. The effectiveness of data collection from smart meters is increased by AMI technology, which permits real-time or nearly real-time monitoring of water consumption at the individual consumer level. GIS and AMI work together to create a comprehensive platform that makes use of spatial data and offers accurate usage information to improve operational effectiveness and decision-making.

Due to the integration of GIS and SMI, water utilities can now overlay consumption data on geographic maps, providing a deeper understanding of consumption patterns and trends in different regions. With this integration, it is simpler to identify water-intensive areas, potential leaks, and unusual consumption spikes. Utilities can strategically plan infrastructure improvements, focus water conservation efforts, and optimise resource allocation with the help of GIS for greater sustainability and cost efficiency. It accomplishes this by displaying the distribution of water consumption and fusing it with other geographic data, which is shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Integration of GIS and smart metering.

Figure 2

Integration of GIS and smart metering.

Close modal

In addition, this integration enables predictive analytics, which forecasts future water demand by combining geographic data from GIS and historical consumption data from AMI. Utilities can use these forecasts to proactively plan for capacity expansions, manage distribution networks efficiently, and ensure sufficient water supply during peak demand periods. Thus, the integration of GIS and AMI plays a crucial role in optimising water supply systems by enabling a data-driven approach to decision-making, ultimately raising the overall efficiency, sustainability, and resilience of water supply operations.

Data gathering, real-time monitoring, and water supply control

Central SCADA architecture

Figures 3 and 4 show data gathering real-time monitoring and water supply control and SCADA Master Control Station (SMCS) Software Components: The SMCS personal computers (PCs) use Windows 2000 Professional/2000 Server as the operating system. The SCADA application is developed on the Wonderware package with Intouch 8.0 as a process visualisation tool and In-SQL Server 8.0 as a database. ALARM/EVENT MANAGEMENT: Wonderware Intouch 8.0 provides standard Alarms/Event Screen for the purpose of effective Alarm/Event Management. Software alarms are generated at SCADA Master Block Request (MBR), in case of any critical status, i.e. ELSR level (HI or low), GLSR level (HI or low) (Oren & Stroh 2013; Liu et al. 2016; Kong et al. 2017; Koech et al. 2018)
Figure 3

Data gathering real-time monitoring and water supply control.

Figure 3

Data gathering real-time monitoring and water supply control.

Close modal
Figure 4

SCADA Master Control Station (SMCS).

Figure 4

SCADA Master Control Station (SMCS).

Close modal
The minimum speed required for a minimum flow of 17.2 m3/d corresponding to the maximum WL condition is 67.45% of the rated speed a single pump with speed variation can be operated for discharge up to 30.0 m3/d, without exceeding the rated speed. Up to about 30.0 m3/d, it is preferable to operate a single pump for less power consumption, as seen from values for KW per m3/d. For flow exceeding 30.0 m3/d, two of pumps shall have to be operated, as power drawn for a single pump operation leaves an inadequate margin. It is desirable to operate two of pumps for less power consumption, for flow above 30.0 m3/d and it is shown in Figure 5. Table 1 shows the variation in speed, head, efficiency, and power for a given discharge for feeder main 1.
Table 1

Variation in speed, head, efficiency, and power for given discharge for feeder main 1

Speed
Q (m3/d)No. of pumpsMBR WLHead (m)RPM% of rated speedEfficiencyKw drawn KW/m3/dKW/m3/dRemarks
17.2 Min. 17.151 1,184.4 39.46 0.816 43.93 2.55 KW for two pumps shall be twice the speed higher 
  Max. 11.361 1,003.6 67.45 0.867 28.24 1.65 
20 Min. 17.916 1,238.2 83.21 0.851 50.89 2.54 
  Max. 12.126 1,070.8 71.96 0.865 34.23 1.71 
25 Min. 19,541 1,353.1 90.93 0.883 66.31 2.65 
  Max. 13.751 1,204.2 80.93 0.893 46.74 1.87 
30 Min. 21.496 1,482.8 99.65 0.893 86.24 2.88 
  Max. 15.706 1,349.8 90.71 0.888 63.66 2.12 
30 Min. 19.285 1,221.4 82.08 0.747 93.98 3.13 
  Max. 13.495 1,045.9 70.29 0.811 62.33 2.08 
31 Min. 21.926 1,509.3 101.43 0.893 90.88 2.93 
  Max. 16.136 1,380.1 92.75 0.886 67.86 2.19 
31 Min. 19.566 1,233.7 82.91 0.758 97.72 3.15 
  Max. 13.776 1,060.6 71.28 0.818 65.2 2.1 
32 Min. 22.369 1,537.1 103.3 0.893 95.22 2.97 
  Max. 16.579 1,410.6 94.8 0.885 71.88 2.25 
32 Min. 19.854 1,246.3 84.76 0.767 98.52 3.08 
  Max. 14.064 1,075.6 72.28 0.824 65.8 2.06 
Speed
Q (m3/d)No. of pumpsMBR WLHead (m)RPM% of rated speedEfficiencyKw drawn KW/m3/dKW/m3/dRemarks
17.2 Min. 17.151 1,184.4 39.46 0.816 43.93 2.55 KW for two pumps shall be twice the speed higher 
  Max. 11.361 1,003.6 67.45 0.867 28.24 1.65 
20 Min. 17.916 1,238.2 83.21 0.851 50.89 2.54 
  Max. 12.126 1,070.8 71.96 0.865 34.23 1.71 
25 Min. 19,541 1,353.1 90.93 0.883 66.31 2.65 
  Max. 13.751 1,204.2 80.93 0.893 46.74 1.87 
30 Min. 21.496 1,482.8 99.65 0.893 86.24 2.88 
  Max. 15.706 1,349.8 90.71 0.888 63.66 2.12 
30 Min. 19.285 1,221.4 82.08 0.747 93.98 3.13 
  Max. 13.495 1,045.9 70.29 0.811 62.33 2.08 
31 Min. 21.926 1,509.3 101.43 0.893 90.88 2.93 
  Max. 16.136 1,380.1 92.75 0.886 67.86 2.19 
31 Min. 19.566 1,233.7 82.91 0.758 97.72 3.15 
  Max. 13.776 1,060.6 71.28 0.818 65.2 2.1 
32 Min. 22.369 1,537.1 103.3 0.893 95.22 2.97 
  Max. 16.579 1,410.6 94.8 0.885 71.88 2.25 
32 Min. 19.854 1,246.3 84.76 0.767 98.52 3.08 
  Max. 14.064 1,075.6 72.28 0.824 65.8 2.06 
Figure 5

Main feeder 1 with location, proposed storage capacity, flow, pump capacity, and pump head.

Figure 5

Main feeder 1 with location, proposed storage capacity, flow, pump capacity, and pump head.

Close modal
The minimum speed required for a minimum flow of 32.33 m3/d corresponding to the maximum WL condition is 68.93% of the rated speed. A single pump with speed variation can be operated for discharge up to approximately 58.0 m3/d, without exceeding rated speed. Up to about 59.0 m3/d, it is preferable to operate a single pump for less power consumption as seen from values for KW per m3/d. For flow exceeding 59.0 m3/d, two pumps shall have to be operated as power drawn for a single pump operation leaves an inadequate margin. It is desirable to operate two pumps for less power consumption, for flow above 59.0 m3/d is shown in Figure 6 and in Table 2.
Table 2

Variation in speed, head, efficiency, and power for given discharge for feeder main 1

Speed
Q (m3/d)No. of pumpsMBR WLHead (m)RPM% of rated speedEfficiencyKw drawn KW/m3/dKW/m3/dRemarks
32.33 Min. 25,772 742.07 74.73 0.879 117.66 3.64 KW for two pumps shall be twice the Speed higher than rated 
  Max. 20,982 684.47 68.93 0.873 97 
35 Min. 26,451 760.74 76.61 0.876 129.8 3.71 
  Max. 21,661 708.8 71.38 0.867 109.23 3.12 
40 Min. 27.85 805.72 81.14 0.866 156.39 3.91 
  Max. 23.6 756.77 76.21 0.852 133.06 3.33 
45 Min. 29.41 853.58 85.96 0.852 185.78 4.13 
  Max. 24.62 807.61 81.33 0.835 159.62 3.55 
50 Min. 31.13 903.93 91.03 0.837 220.1 4.4 
  Max. 26.34 860.73 86.68 0.818 193.52 3.82 
55 Min. 33.02 856.26 96.3 0.822 260.14 4.73 
  Max. 28.26 915.55 92.2 0.802 229.24 4.17 
55 Min 30.9 767.89 77.33 0.872 222.41 4.04 
  Max. 26.11 716.45 72.15 0.878 204.35 3.72 
56 Min. 33,422 967.08 97.39 0.819 267.69 4.78 
  Max. 28.632 926.67 93.32 0.799 237.64 4.24 
56 Min. 31.223 773.55 77.9 0.872 246.04 2.39 
  Max. 26,433 722.41 72.75 0.878 210.01 3.75 
57 Min. 33.825 977.81 98.47 0.816 276.74 4.85 
  Max. 29.035 937.99 94.46 0.796 244.95 4.33 
57 Min. 31,546 779.11 78.46 0.874 251.34 4.41 
  Max. 26,756 728.46 73.36 0.879 215.54 3.79 
58 Min 34,235 988.63 99.59 0.813 286.02 4.93 
  Max. 29,445 949.21 95.59 0.793 253.73 4.37 
58 Min. 31,875 784.87 79.04 0.875 256.63 4.48 
  Max. 27,085 734.62 73.98 0.879 221.96 3.83 
59 Min. 34.65 999.06 100.61 0.81 295.11 
  Max. 29.86 960.63 96.74 0.79 261.39 4.43 
59 Min. 32.208 790.63 79.62 0.876 265.19 4.49 
  Max. 27.418 735.69 74.08 0.879 228.44 3.87 
60 Min. 35.072 1,010 101.71 0.807 204.86 5.08 
  Max. 30,282 971.95 97.88 0.787 260.54 4.51 
60 Min. 32,547 796.39 80.2 0.876 272.56 4.54 
  Max. 27,757 746.93 75.22 0.88 234.36 3.9 
Speed
Q (m3/d)No. of pumpsMBR WLHead (m)RPM% of rated speedEfficiencyKw drawn KW/m3/dKW/m3/dRemarks
32.33 Min. 25,772 742.07 74.73 0.879 117.66 3.64 KW for two pumps shall be twice the Speed higher than rated 
  Max. 20,982 684.47 68.93 0.873 97 
35 Min. 26,451 760.74 76.61 0.876 129.8 3.71 
  Max. 21,661 708.8 71.38 0.867 109.23 3.12 
40 Min. 27.85 805.72 81.14 0.866 156.39 3.91 
  Max. 23.6 756.77 76.21 0.852 133.06 3.33 
45 Min. 29.41 853.58 85.96 0.852 185.78 4.13 
  Max. 24.62 807.61 81.33 0.835 159.62 3.55 
50 Min. 31.13 903.93 91.03 0.837 220.1 4.4 
  Max. 26.34 860.73 86.68 0.818 193.52 3.82 
55 Min. 33.02 856.26 96.3 0.822 260.14 4.73 
  Max. 28.26 915.55 92.2 0.802 229.24 4.17 
55 Min 30.9 767.89 77.33 0.872 222.41 4.04 
  Max. 26.11 716.45 72.15 0.878 204.35 3.72 
56 Min. 33,422 967.08 97.39 0.819 267.69 4.78 
  Max. 28.632 926.67 93.32 0.799 237.64 4.24 
56 Min. 31.223 773.55 77.9 0.872 246.04 2.39 
  Max. 26,433 722.41 72.75 0.878 210.01 3.75 
57 Min. 33.825 977.81 98.47 0.816 276.74 4.85 
  Max. 29.035 937.99 94.46 0.796 244.95 4.33 
57 Min. 31,546 779.11 78.46 0.874 251.34 4.41 
  Max. 26,756 728.46 73.36 0.879 215.54 3.79 
58 Min 34,235 988.63 99.59 0.813 286.02 4.93 
  Max. 29,445 949.21 95.59 0.793 253.73 4.37 
58 Min. 31,875 784.87 79.04 0.875 256.63 4.48 
  Max. 27,085 734.62 73.98 0.879 221.96 3.83 
59 Min. 34.65 999.06 100.61 0.81 295.11 
  Max. 29.86 960.63 96.74 0.79 261.39 4.43 
59 Min. 32.208 790.63 79.62 0.876 265.19 4.49 
  Max. 27.418 735.69 74.08 0.879 228.44 3.87 
60 Min. 35.072 1,010 101.71 0.807 204.86 5.08 
  Max. 30,282 971.95 97.88 0.787 260.54 4.51 
60 Min. 32,547 796.39 80.2 0.876 272.56 4.54 
  Max. 27,757 746.93 75.22 0.88 234.36 3.9 
Figure 6

Main feeder 2 with location, proposed storage capacity, flow, pump capacity, and pump head.

Figure 6

Main feeder 2 with location, proposed storage capacity, flow, pump capacity, and pump head.

Close modal
For the economical operation of FM3, the following procedure is to be followed.
Figure 7

Main feeder 3 with location, proposed storage capacity, flow, pump capacity, and pump head.

Figure 7

Main feeder 3 with location, proposed storage capacity, flow, pump capacity, and pump head.

Close modal

The minimum speed required for a minimum flow of 9.72 m3/d corresponding to the maximum WL condition is 52.87% of the rated speed. A single pump with speed variation can be operated for discharge up to approximately 22.0 m3/d, without exceeding the rated speed. Up to about 22.0 m3/d, it is preferable to operate a single pump for less power consumption as seen from values for KW per m3/d. For flow exceeding 22.0 m3/d, two pumps shall have to be operated as the power drawn for a single pump operation leaves an inadequate margin. It is desirable to operate two pumps for less power consumption, for flow above 22.0 m3/d, and the variation in speed, head, efficiency, and power for the given discharge for feeder main 3 is detailed in Table 3 and Figure 7.

Table 3

Variation in speed, head, efficiency, and power for given discharge for feeder main 3

Q (m3/d)No. of pumpsMBR WLHead (m)SpeedEfficiencykW drawnkW/m3/dRemarks
RPM% rated speed
972 Min. 18.48 889.90 61.37 0.87 26.68 2.74 Speed higher than rated 
  Max. 12.69 766.40 52.87 0.85 20.44 2.10  
15 Min. 26.84 1,129.20 7,788.00 85.00 5,732.00 387.00  
  Max. 21.05 1,029.10 70.97 0.82 46.36 3.09  
16 Min. 28.77 1,177.10 81.18 0_84 65.69 4.09  
  Max. 22.98 1,080.80 74.54 82.00 5,402.00 338.00  
16 "" Min. 26.78 1,005.70 69.36 0.85 63.88 3.99  
  Max. 20.99 906.80 62.54 0.86 50.16 3.13  
17 Min. 30.81 1,225.70 84.53 0.84 74_53 4.38  
  Max. 25.02 1,132.90 7,813.00 81.00 625.00 368.00  
17 Min. 28.56 1,042.90 71.92 0.85 70.24 4.13  
  Max. 22.77 947.50 65.34 0.86 57.76 3.40  
18 Min. 32.96 1,274.70 8,791.00 83.00 8,475.00 471.00  
  Max. 27.17 1,185.30 81.74 0.81 71.85 399.00  
18 Min. 30.44 1,080.60 74.52 0.86 77.98 4.33  
  Max. 24.65 988.50 68.17 86.00 65.39 3.63  
19 Min. 35.21 1,324.30 91.33 83.00 9,567.00 503.00  
  Max. 29.42 1,238.00 85.38 0.81 82.51 4.34  
19 Min. 32.41 1,118.80 77.16 0.86 87.76 4.62  
  Max. 26.62 1,029.80 71.02 0.86 74.00 0.10  
20 Min. 37.58 1,367.90 9,434.00 0.82 1,078.50 539.00  
  Max. 31.79 1,286.20 88.74 0_8 93.99 4.70  
20 Min. 34.48 1,310.40 90.37 0.81 102.82 5.14  
  Max. 28.68 1,222.22 84.30 0.78 44.58 4.46  
21 Min. 39.98 1,410.99 97.30 0.82 120.58 5.74  
  Max. 34.19 1,304.82 89.99 0.79 107.58 5.12  
22 Min. 41.18 1,432.01 98.76 81.00 1,325.60 6.03  
  Max. 35.29 1,327.53 91.55 0.77 1,187.50 54.00  
23 Min. 42.42 1,453.41 100.24 0.80 144.91 6.30  
  Max. 36.62 1,350.40 93.13 0.86 130.82 5.69  
23 Min. 41.30 1,434.13 98.90 85.00 66.39 5.77  
  Max. 35.61 1,379.77 917.00 6.00 56.99 4.95  
Q (m3/d)No. of pumpsMBR WLHead (m)SpeedEfficiencykW drawnkW/m3/dRemarks
RPM% rated speed
972 Min. 18.48 889.90 61.37 0.87 26.68 2.74 Speed higher than rated 
  Max. 12.69 766.40 52.87 0.85 20.44 2.10  
15 Min. 26.84 1,129.20 7,788.00 85.00 5,732.00 387.00  
  Max. 21.05 1,029.10 70.97 0.82 46.36 3.09  
16 Min. 28.77 1,177.10 81.18 0_84 65.69 4.09  
  Max. 22.98 1,080.80 74.54 82.00 5,402.00 338.00  
16 "" Min. 26.78 1,005.70 69.36 0.85 63.88 3.99  
  Max. 20.99 906.80 62.54 0.86 50.16 3.13  
17 Min. 30.81 1,225.70 84.53 0.84 74_53 4.38  
  Max. 25.02 1,132.90 7,813.00 81.00 625.00 368.00  
17 Min. 28.56 1,042.90 71.92 0.85 70.24 4.13  
  Max. 22.77 947.50 65.34 0.86 57.76 3.40  
18 Min. 32.96 1,274.70 8,791.00 83.00 8,475.00 471.00  
  Max. 27.17 1,185.30 81.74 0.81 71.85 399.00  
18 Min. 30.44 1,080.60 74.52 0.86 77.98 4.33  
  Max. 24.65 988.50 68.17 86.00 65.39 3.63  
19 Min. 35.21 1,324.30 91.33 83.00 9,567.00 503.00  
  Max. 29.42 1,238.00 85.38 0.81 82.51 4.34  
19 Min. 32.41 1,118.80 77.16 0.86 87.76 4.62  
  Max. 26.62 1,029.80 71.02 0.86 74.00 0.10  
20 Min. 37.58 1,367.90 9,434.00 0.82 1,078.50 539.00  
  Max. 31.79 1,286.20 88.74 0_8 93.99 4.70  
20 Min. 34.48 1,310.40 90.37 0.81 102.82 5.14  
  Max. 28.68 1,222.22 84.30 0.78 44.58 4.46  
21 Min. 39.98 1,410.99 97.30 0.82 120.58 5.74  
  Max. 34.19 1,304.82 89.99 0.79 107.58 5.12  
22 Min. 41.18 1,432.01 98.76 81.00 1,325.60 6.03  
  Max. 35.29 1,327.53 91.55 0.77 1,187.50 54.00  
23 Min. 42.42 1,453.41 100.24 0.80 144.91 6.30  
  Max. 36.62 1,350.40 93.13 0.86 130.82 5.69  
23 Min. 41.30 1,434.13 98.90 85.00 66.39 5.77  
  Max. 35.61 1,379.77 917.00 6.00 56.99 4.95  
Table 4

Minimum flow analysis

Night flow measurement analysis
DMA-capitol greenDate: 10/4/2006
Location
CODEParametersAbbreviationValueUnitFormulaRemarks
Supply 2.10 m3/d  Logged or read from the district metre 
Billed volume BV 0.30 m3/d  From metre reading/IT 
NRW volume NRWVOL 1.80 m3/d (1)–(2)  
NRW percentage NRW% 85.52 (3)/(1) × 100  
No. of WSC wsc 234.00 ea   
Minimum NFR MinNFR 66.66 Li/min 0.10 Logged value: Compare with NRW volume . It should be lower or equal to the NRW volume 
Pressure at Min. NFR pnfr 19.31 psi  Logged value 
Avg. daily pressure pave 21.70 psi  Logged value 
Allowable night user (ANU) ANU 0.10 Li/min/wm  Assume value. Verify and analyse usage in the area. Some areas may have higher or lower ‘Allowable night user value’. 
10 Allowable night user value (ANUL) ANU 23.40 Li/min (9) × (5)  
11 Net NFR NetNFR 43.26 Li/min 0.07 If ANU > MinNFR, no physical losses 
 Physical Losses (PL)      
 Physical Losses PLVOL 0.07 m3/d  International formula 
  PL% 4%   
 Commercial Losses (CL)      
 Commercial Losses CLVOL 1.73 m3/d   
  CL% 96%   
 Target (Recoverable volume to attain 10% NRW)      
 By increasing 10% billed volume Recovered supply volume and increased billed volume     
 Supply 0.37 m3/d 1.72 m3/d 
 Billed Volume 8V 0.33 m3/d 0.03 m3/d 
 NRW% NRW% 10.00   
Night flow measurement analysis
DMA-capitol greenDate: 10/4/2006
Location
CODEParametersAbbreviationValueUnitFormulaRemarks
Supply 2.10 m3/d  Logged or read from the district metre 
Billed volume BV 0.30 m3/d  From metre reading/IT 
NRW volume NRWVOL 1.80 m3/d (1)–(2)  
NRW percentage NRW% 85.52 (3)/(1) × 100  
No. of WSC wsc 234.00 ea   
Minimum NFR MinNFR 66.66 Li/min 0.10 Logged value: Compare with NRW volume . It should be lower or equal to the NRW volume 
Pressure at Min. NFR pnfr 19.31 psi  Logged value 
Avg. daily pressure pave 21.70 psi  Logged value 
Allowable night user (ANU) ANU 0.10 Li/min/wm  Assume value. Verify and analyse usage in the area. Some areas may have higher or lower ‘Allowable night user value’. 
10 Allowable night user value (ANUL) ANU 23.40 Li/min (9) × (5)  
11 Net NFR NetNFR 43.26 Li/min 0.07 If ANU > MinNFR, no physical losses 
 Physical Losses (PL)      
 Physical Losses PLVOL 0.07 m3/d  International formula 
  PL% 4%   
 Commercial Losses (CL)      
 Commercial Losses CLVOL 1.73 m3/d   
  CL% 96%   
 Target (Recoverable volume to attain 10% NRW)      
 By increasing 10% billed volume Recovered supply volume and increased billed volume     
 Supply 0.37 m3/d 1.72 m3/d 
 Billed Volume 8V 0.33 m3/d 0.03 m3/d 
 NRW% NRW% 10.00   

Review of devices and methodology

In essence, a smart water meter serves the same purpose as a standard or conventional water meter. The meter, however, is connected to a device that enables continuous electronic reading, storage, display, and transfer of water consumption data in order to make it a ‘smart District Metering Area (DMA).’ which is shown in Figure 8 and the process and non-process Remote Monitoring and control is shown in Figure 9.
Figure 8

District metering area.

Figure 8

District metering area.

Close modal
Figure 9

Parameters of processes and non-process parameters.

Figure 9

Parameters of processes and non-process parameters.

Close modal
A solar photovoltaic (PV) module's charge controller, inverter, battery storage, and premium solar panels are all integrated into the remote monitoring and control panel. The solar charge controller controls the output of the panels, and a battery management system controls the storage of extra energy in a sturdy battery system. The remote monitoring module, which uses sensors, Global system for Mobile Communication (GSM), and WiFi for communication, is the brains of the system (Adhikary et al. 2010; Belkhiri & Narany 2015; Ahmadi & Sedghamiz 2017; Kong et al. 2017). It provides real-time temperature, voltage, and battery level data. An intuitive control panel facilitates configuration and shows the status of the system; data logging and analytics maximise productivity, which is shown in Figure 10.
Figure 10

Remote monitoring and control panel with solar PV module.

Figure 10

Remote monitoring and control panel with solar PV module.

Close modal
In order to effectively manage water flow, the remote monitoring and control system for water flow integrates sensors and actuators. A centralised control unit receives data from sensors that measure water flow rates, pressure, and other pertinent parameters in real-time. Users can check the status of the system and change the flow settings remotely using an interface. Pumps and valves can be turned on or off via the control panel, providing exact control over the distribution of water. The capability of the system to remotely identify and react to changes in flow rates improves operational effectiveness, lowers waste, and enables prompt interventions. This system provides a dependable and remotely accessible way to optimise water flow for uses like irrigation, industrial processes, or municipal water supply which is shown in Figure 11.
Figure 11

Flow-remote monitoring and control of water flow.

Figure 11

Flow-remote monitoring and control of water flow.

Close modal

Pressure and water adequate test

An essential step in guaranteeing the effectiveness and dependability of a water supply system is a pressure and water adequacy test. This testing procedure, which makes use of cutting-edge monitoring technologies, offers insightful information for maximising water pressure, flow, and system performance, which is shown in Figures 12 and 13.
  • Smart DMA is a worldwide accepted tool to operate and manage a network area wherein the hydraulic boundary is defined by a system of isolation valves and flow meter(s) or gauging point(s).

    • Checklist: How to form a DMA?

    • • Pre-commencement activities.

    • Zero-pressure test (ZPT): It is a procedure to ensure that the designed DMA is isolated. This procedure is done at night when the pressure in the area is high.

Figure 12

Process of ZPT.

Figure 12

Process of ZPT.

Close modal
Figure 13

Flow diagram water adequate test.

Figure 13

Flow diagram water adequate test.

Close modal

Water adequacy test

  • False: It is a procedure to ensure that pressure is sufficient within the designed DMA only after closing all valves (IVs) and letting water pass through its district meter.

  • True: It is a procedure to ensure that pressure is sufficient outside the designed DMA after closing all IVs and letting water pass through its district metre.

  • False: This procedure is done during nighttime when the pressure is high.

DMA analysis

A crucial technique for managing water distribution systems is DMA analysis, which divides a larger network into smaller, separately monitored zones. To continuously monitor water flow and pressure, each district is outfitted with flow meters and pressure sensors. The main goal is to increase system performance by identifying problems such as leaks and pressure differences in particular regions. DMA makes it possible to identify water losses and prioritise maintenance tasks by using the accurate data analysis shown in Figure 14 and the results are discussed in Figure 15.
Figure 14

Results of DMA history.

Figure 14

Results of DMA history.

Close modal
Figure 15

The pressure pattern matches the pump station pressure pattern and is adjusted to match the demand pattern (Note: no PRV used). Resulting in higher pressure during peak demand vs. non-peak.

Figure 15

The pressure pattern matches the pump station pressure pattern and is adjusted to match the demand pattern (Note: no PRV used). Resulting in higher pressure during peak demand vs. non-peak.

Close modal
NRW computation and components of NRW: Physical vs. commercial losses minimum flow analysis/night flow rate(NFR)

Required data

  • Supply, Bulb Volume (BV), Non-revenue water (NRW), and Water Supply Corporation (WSC) can be obtained from historical data.

  • Minimum NFR and pressure are obtained through actual activity (Table 4).

Night user is computed from actual activity equations

  • Physical losses = Qavg = Qmin × (Pmin/Pavg)

  • Commercial losses = NRW volume-physical losses

A new era in water supply management has begun with the integration of GIS mapping and cutting-edge metering technologies, producing notable results. The availability and accuracy of water-related data have significantly improved as a result of these technological advancements. Decision-makers now have easy access to real-time consumption insights, ensuring they have the most recent data available for efficient decision-making. This level of data accuracy has significant ramifications for water resource management since it enables planners and managers to react quickly to changing demand dynamics.

One cannot overestimate the importance of GIS models in this situation. Visualising the spatial and temporal patterns of water demand has shown to be impossible without these models. Decision makers can strategically distribute resources and infrastructure by mapping these patterns, which will maximise the distribution of water resources. For instance, resources can be swiftly transferred to maintain a consistent supply to areas in need during periods of peak water demand or in reaction to localised shortages. In addition, the use of GIS mapping in urban planning procedures has transformed city planning. It enables the strategic placement of water supply infrastructure, minimising the need for expensive expansion projects and encouraging water-wise land-use regulations.

Advanced metering technologies have also significantly increased the effectiveness of managing the water supply. These systems have the benefit of remote monitoring, making it possible to track water usage in real time and quickly find leaks or anomalies. By reducing water losses within distribution networks, this proactive method not only conserves water resources but also generates significant cost savings. Rapid response to such abnormalities reduces resource waste and operational interruptions, emphasising the revolutionary effects of advanced metering on water delivery systems.

Beyond improving infrastructure, the use of GIS technology has greatly improved the knowledge, expertise, and capabilities of those who study and work with water resources. It equips them with powerful analytical tools to investigate a variety of water management solutions. Professionals can come up with novel solutions to complex problems involving water resources by utilising data-driven insights. The improvement of these skills helps make projects for managing water resources more effective overall.

However, despite these incredible developments, the cyclical nature of droughts continues to be a problem, and climate change is making them more often and more severe. GIS mapping and cutting-edge metering technology have made it possible to better prepare for and respond to drought situations in this area. These developments give us the resources we need to monitor droughts proactively, develop early warning systems, and allocate scarce resources. As a result, water supply systems have shown enhanced resilience and dependability even in the face of drought difficulties.

The integration of modern metering technology with GIS mapping has proven crucial in improving the administration of water supply systems. With the help of these tools, a new era of data precision has begun, allowing decision makers to react quickly and successfully to shifting demand trends. The use of GIS in urban planning has cleared the floor for more sustainable and water-efficient city designs in addition to optimising resource allocation. Advanced metering has resulted in lower operating expenses and a smaller environmental impact. In addition, these advances have increased the general resilience of water supply systems in the face of climatic problems in addition to improving the abilities of water resource professionals. To ensure the long-term sustainability of water supplies, reduce the effects of droughts, and satisfy the rising water demands of expanding populations while protecting this priceless natural resource for future generations, it is imperative to continue investing in these technologies.

In conclusion, population growth and the ongoing effects of droughts on irrigated agriculture are the main causes of the rising demand for water resources. To solve the imbalance between water supply and demand, modern metering technology and GIS mapping deployment offer a potential solution. These techniques offer precise information on the spatial and temporal patterns of water usage, facilitating efficient water resource planning and management. The findings of this study demonstrate the beneficial effects of GIS technology on urban planning, the effectiveness of the water supply, and the development of professional abilities among those involved in the management of water resources. It decreases water losses and enhanced system efficiency is the inclusion of modern metering systems. To ensure sustainable and reliable water supply systems, it is essential that governments, municipalities, and water agencies continue to invest in these technologies. It can better manage the water resources, lessen the consequences of droughts, and meet our communities expanding water needs, all while protecting the natural resource for the future.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Adhikary
P. P.
,
Chandrasekharan
H.
,
Chakraborty
D.
&
Kamble
K.
2010
Assessment of groundwater pollution in west Delhi, India using geostatistical approach
.
Environ. Monit. Assess.
167
,
599
615
.
Ahmadi
S. H.
&
Sedghamiz
A.
2007
Geostatistical analysis of spatial and temporal variations of groundwater level
.
Environ. Monit. Assess.
129
(
1
),
277
294
.
Bagherzadeh
S.
,
Kalantari
N.
,
Nobandegani
A. F.
,
Derakhshan
Z.
,
Conti
G. O.
,
Ferrante
M.
&
Malekahmadi
R.
2018
Groundwater vulnerability assessment in karstic aquifers using COP method
.
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Control Ser.
25
,
18960
18979
.
doi:10.1007/s11356-018-1911-8
.
Chanapathi
T.
,
Thatikonda
S.
,
Pandey
V. P.
&
Shrestha
S.
2019
Fuzzy-based approach for evaluating groundwater sustainability of Asian cities
.
Sustainable Cities Soc.
44
,
321
331
.
Ghosh
S.
&
Mujumdar
P. P.
2006
Risk minimization in water quality control problems of a river system
.
Adv. Water Resour.
29
(
3
),
458
470
.
Koech
R.
,
Gyasi-Agyei
Y.
&
Randall
T.
2018
The evolution of urban water metering and conservation in Australia
.
Flow Meas. Instrum.
62
,
19
26
.
Liu
A.
,
Giurco
D.
&
Mukheibir
P.
2016
Urban water conservation through customised water and end-use information
.
J. Cleaner Prod.
112
,
3164
3175
.
Maiti
S.
,
Erram
V. C.
,
Gupta
G.
,
Tiwari
R. K.
,
Kulkarni
U. D.
&
Sangpal
R. R.
2013
Assessment of groundwater quality: A fusion of geochemical and geophysical information via Bayesian neural networks
.
Environ. Monit. Assess.
185
(
4
),
3445
3465
.
McKone
T. E.
&
Deshpande
A. W.
2005
Can fuzzy logic bring complex environmental problems into focus?
Environ. Sci. Technol.
39
(
2
),
42A
47A
.
Patki
V. K.
,
Shrihari
S.
,
Manu
B.
&
Deka
P. C.
2015
Fuzzy system modeling for forecasting water quality index in municipal distribution system
.
Urban Water J.
12
(
2
),
89
110
.
Rajendran
R.
,
Emerenshiya
C. A.
&
Dheenadayalan
M. S.
2019
Investigations on groundwater quality in Tiruchirappalli city, Tamilnadu
.
Sustainable Water Resour. Manage.
5
(
2
),
599
609
.
Salari
M.
,
SalamiShahid
E.
,
Afzali
S. H.
,
Ehteshami
M.
,
Conti
G. O.
,
Derakhshan
Z.
&
Sheibani
S. N.
2018
Quality assessment and artificial neural networks modeling for characterization of chemical and physical parameters of potable water
.
Food Chem. Toxicol.
118
,
212
219
.
Silvert
W.
2000
Fuzzy indices of environmental conditions
.
Ecol. Modell.
130
(
1
),
111
119
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).