The objective of the current study is to evaluate and appreciate various design parameters for simple solar stills impact yielding rate and heat transmission characteristics. For improved utility, indicators and performance comparisons of several solar stills have also been created. In the case of the enhanced wick, most of the researchers use wick on water surfaces to enhance the evaporation rate. It has been observed that the solar stills with wet wick on the side walls provide high porosity with thin film evaporation, thus improving distillation. Also, the solar stills with wick integration were superior to other types of solar desalination systems that utilize wicking materials to enhance the evaporation and condensation processes. The interpretations were significantly carried out, and numerous recommendations for future improvement and the generation of novel concepts to work around practical constraints were also made in the present study.

  • Highlights wet wick on the side wall provide high porosity.

  • Wick-supported thin film evaporation improves distillation.

  • Enhanced vaporization surface along with condensation area is a good suggestion for a significant solar still system.

Water is the most important substance on Earth for living species and day by day the need for freshwater increases with the development of society, industries, and agriculture. Only 1.6% is accessible as freshwater in lakes, rivers, etc. while 98% is available as groundwater (Arunkumar et al. 2019; Chauhan et al. 2020). The United Nations (UN) identified a relationship between climate change and water and pointed out the critical situation in the consumption of Earth's water six times in the last 100 years (Mekonnen & Hoekstra 2016). Several processes are producing fresh water but are neither eco-friendly nor economical. Desalination is indeed a promising technology to convert seawater into potable water, and utilizing renewable energy sources like solar power makes the process more sustainable against the global challenge of water scarcity (Suraparaju et al. 2021a). As per the International Desalination Association (IDA) report, the world's largest desalination plant runs on the RO technique and is based on fossil fuel (Largest Water Desalination Plant, Guinness World Records). Most of the development in the desalination process is done in African Nations, Middle East Arab Nations, India, China, and Australia where fresh water is not sufficiently available (Esfahani et al. 2016). Research and modification focused on moving toward sustainable and renewable resources like wind energy, solar energy, biomass energy, and geothermal energy. The solar desalination technique was observed as the most environmentally-friendly and economical way to produce fresh water from saline or brackish water (Arunkumar et al. 2019). As compared to the use of other renewable energy in desalination, the solar still system has the lowest maintenance, low running cost, and negligible effect on the environment (Alsehli et al. 2017). Solar energy is completely available at zero cost which can be used to produce fresh water in solar desalination. The major part of receiving solar energy from the sun is wastage throughout the year which is about 1 kW/m2 (NPTEL: Electrical Engineering-Energy Resources & Technology). Solar desalination is based on the greenhouse effect. When solar radiation falls on the cover surface of solar desalination, some of the incident radiation is transmitted to the inside of the basin while some is absorbed and reflected. Some of the transmitted radiation again reflects from the water surface and some of it is absorbed by water and transmitted through water which again reflects from the wall, hence water gets heated and evaporation occurs. Generated steam flows upwards with a buoyancy effect and condenses at the cover surface of the basin causing lower temperature than saturation temperature corresponding to the partial pressure of water vapor within the basin (Singh et al. 2020). Solar desalination is classified as direct and indirect techniques as per management of storage and utilization of solar energy. Direct solar desalination techniques require a huge surface area to receive more solar energy to operate and produce fresh water while indirect solar desalination requires different space to produce potable water, for example, multi-effect desalination (Sharaf et al. 2011), reverse osmosis (Freire-Gormaly & Bilton 2019) with a large concentration of solar radiation, therefore indirect solar desalination requires huge photovoltaic (PV) panels and installation of such arrangements have high initial costs and complex maintenance requirements (Qiblawey & Banat 2008). Solar desalination with humidification and dehumidification methods is also popular nowadays because of its simple installation with enhanced production rate. The studies observed that the heat storage utility of evacuated tube collectors yields solar desalination (Verma et al. 2019). Stepped solar still with MgO in water is more effective than TiO2 in water (Panchal et al. 2019). Water pollution and its effects on human health, such as nutrients, thermal pollution, sewage, etc., are also strict reasons to require fresh water. Many technologies are in use to produce fresh water. Solar desalination is mainly classified as direct and indirect as per the use of solar energy. Direct solar desalination consumes solar radiation to produce yield while indirect solar desalination collects solar radiation which is then utilized to produce fresh water. Many technologies are there for solar desalination and are classified in Figure 1 (Ashmad & Hameed 1997; Tiwari & Sahota 2017).
Figure 1

Classification of solar still technologies (Panchal et al. 2019).

Figure 1

Classification of solar still technologies (Panchal et al. 2019).

Close modal

Several researchers have experimented with various design parameters on solar stills to optimize the distillate. It has been observed that various design/operating parameters affect productivity and efficiency such as angle of solar radiation, angle of inclination, cover plate transmissivity, depth of water, wind velocity, basin surface absorptivity, flow rate, convective heat transfer coefficient, insulation of wall of basin, and so on. These parameters help to modify and design solar desalination to be more productive. The present study refers to the evaluation of various design parameters for simple solar stills impacting yielding rate and heat transmission characteristics. The observations for the utility indicators and performance comparisons of several solar stills have been mentioned along with the significant interpretations, and finally, recommendations for future improvement of the novel concepts were also made in the proposed work.

Observation of enhanced parameters for conventional solar still

Single- and double-slope collector solar still

Although it operates similarly to single-slope solar stills (SSSS), a double-slope solar still (DSSS) has two glasses to cover the top that increase the condensation surface area for condensation of the rising vapor inside the still. The DSCSS has a more productive rate of fresh water with effective condensation, as shown in Figure 2 (Kumar & Prakash 2019). According to Singh (2021), the double slope of the cover plate explores more surface area on a specific inclination to be more efficient. Condensation on the cover surface is enhanced with a large surface area.
Figure 2

Double-slope collector solar still (Tiwari & Sahota 2017).

Figure 2

Double-slope collector solar still (Tiwari & Sahota 2017).

Close modal

Murugavel et al. (2010) designed a double-slope solar still with an outer surface of mild steel and observed the performance of the system with a level of water and various heat-sensible storage materials, including quartzite rock, concrete cement pieces, red brick-washed stones, and iron scraps. They concluded that the basin material was quartzite rock that was still only an inch thick. Additionally, the temperature of the glass and water as well as the production rate was negatively impacted by the still's capacity and materials. In Ghaziabad, India (2840° N, 7725° E), Ashmad & Hameed (1997) performed thermal modeling for a double-slope solar still with 30 cm of water depth operating in the natural circulation mode. They concluded that, despite the double-slope active solar still providing a yield that was 51% larger than that of the double-slope passive solar, the passive system had a higher efficiency than the active system did. Furthermore, the double-slope active solar system still had greater energy efficiency than the passive system.

Rajaseenivasan & Murugavel (2013) used the Microsoft Excel program to research the effectiveness, productivity, and dependent variables of a double-slope solar still and a double-basin solar still under the meteorological conditions of Tamil Nadu, India. In contrast to the single basin system, they concluded that adding an extra basin increased productivity by 85%, reaching 2.99 l/m2/day. Although the lower basin had higher productivity, the rate of yield was reduced when the water mass in both the upper and lower basins increased. To determine the best parameters of design for both types of systems under the meteorological conditions of Constantine, Algeria (latitude 36° 22′ N, longitude 6°37′ E), Abderachid & Abdenacer (2013) investigated the effect of both orientations (east–west and south–north) on the performance of productivity of a symmetrical double-slope solar still compared with an asymmetric solar still with a double effect. According to their research, both stills should be inclined at an angle of 10° for maximum solar light absorption and higher productivity. Higher daily production was shown to be associated with a 20 cm depth of water and a south–north (S-N) orientation, particularly in asymmetric solar stills with a double effect (22.57%) as opposed to symmetric solar stills with a double slope (16.23%).

The performance and output of a double-slope solar still with a capillary film-type condenser were examined by Belhadj et al. (2015) using FORTRAN 90 under the climate conditions of Adrar, Algeria (longitude of 0.17°W, an altitude of 264 m, and a latitude of 27.53°). Their findings indicated that an increase in the flow of saline water feeding the condensing chamber and the space between its two plates has an adverse effect on productivity. The double-slope solar still with capillary film type condenser, however, produced 7.15 kg/m2/day while the typical sun still produced just 4.52 kg/m2/day. Results present the algorithm they employed to compute the temperatures and distill freshwater.

The research was done by Singh (2023) on the exergo-economic and environmental economics of a partially covered PVT-FPC active solar distillation system. They discovered that the use of DSSS was incredibly cost-effective for the production of drinkable water. Additionally, the commercialization of PVT active solar was still viable and affordable in outlying places.

Pyramid collector solar still

A solar desalination system with a basin top cover in the shape of a pyramid is referred to as a pyramid collector solar water still. In comparison to classic type stills, it still has a larger evaporation surface for the same basin area, increasing the productivity of the particular still. The pyramid collector solar still (PCSS) may be improved by altering the height, orientation angle, and other particulars of the pyramid still's top cover. As seen in Figure 3, Kabeel (2009) carried out an experiment using a PCSS concave simply wick still. It can collect more solar thermal energy and produce more reflections since it has a larger surface area. The still basin had a basin area of 1.2 × 1.2 m2, a water depth of 10 cm, and a top glass cover that was angled at a 45° angle. Because it produces a thin layer of water for evaporation, which results in more evaporation and better yielding condensation, concave jute wick achieved better results than simple PCSS. Figure 4 depicts data from Singh (2021) that are pertinent to the system under consideration. They were able to identify the elements that have an impact on triangular PCSS effectiveness thanks to Sathyamurthy et al. (2014) experimental investigation, as depicted in Figure 5. For the most advantageous manipulative design of solar still units, these variables included the heat transfer coefficient, temperature differential at various still segments, cover areas, varied water depths in basins, and fluctuations in wind speed. A greater yield of up to 4.701 l/m2/day was discovered with a 15.5% enhanced outcome at 4.5 m/s wind speed. This experimental examination was carried out in Chennai with a 30° inclination angle and those specific meteorological conditions. Additionally, Tiwari & Tiwari (2008) and El-Sebaii (2000a, 2000b, 2004) examined how various types of solar still units were impacted by various water depths and wind speeds.
Figure 3

Concave wick type PSDS (Singh 2023).

Figure 3

Concave wick type PSDS (Singh 2023).

Close modal
Figure 4

Efficiency variation with respect to time of concave wick type pyramid solar still (Kumar & Prakash 2019).

Figure 4

Efficiency variation with respect to time of concave wick type pyramid solar still (Kumar & Prakash 2019).

Close modal
Figure 5

Experimental setup of triangular PCSS (Kumar & Prakash 2019).

Figure 5

Experimental setup of triangular PCSS (Kumar & Prakash 2019).

Close modal

Black painted inside wall solar still

The theory of radiation heat transfer justifies that black surfaces have maximum absorptivity for any incoming irradiation. Sathyamurthy et al. (2020) used this concept with the inner side wall of the chamber so that the maximum part of incident solar radiation is absorbed by black, and hence the temperature of water and cabin both increases. Hence, the rate of evaporation of water increases, and the performance of solar still enhanced. With a 20% concentration of nanoparticles in black paint, the average temperature of the water, basin, and glass was raised by 10.4, 12.2, and 12.3%, respectively. Beyond 20% of nanoparticle concentration, there is no discernible improvement in water, glass, or basin temperature. When utilizing 10 and 20% nanoparticles in black paint, the yield from solar stills is increased by 27.2 and 34.3%, respectively, and is higher than the output from solar stills using regular black paint.

Spherical solar still

Dhiman (1988) discussed a spherical solar still system and studied it using mathematical modeling. Spherical solar still has a combination of spherical top cover and liner basin. He also compared it to SSSS, and the offered system reported 30% more yield than SSSS because it does not require any solar tracking equipment but instead absorbs solar radiation. Basel later conducted an experimental investigation for the mutable hemispherical solar still (HSSS) and discovered up to 5.7 l/m2/day with 33% efficiency. With the exception of the second system's portability advantage, both systems are free from solar tracking.

Hemispherical solar still

This is still suited for design and setup with improved approachability of solar radiant energy because it does not require tracking of sun irradiation. Ismail (2009) found in the experimental observation that the daily average efficiency of the system reached up to 33%. This system is known as a hemispherical solar desalting system because it still has a high water depth in the center of the basin but has superior and identical sun energy inclusion through its hemispherical-shaped upper cove. Figure 6 depicts the results of an experiment conducted on HSSS with or without top cover cooling by flowing water by Arunkumar et al. (2012). It has a basin area of 0.71 m2, a water depth of 50 cm, and a water mass flow rate of 10 ml/min. When compared to HSSS with no water cooling at the top glass surface, which had 34% efficiency, the result was determined to be better with a 42% efficiency water-cooled glass cover. As the water cooled, the top cover increased the rate of condensation, which eventually improved the yield.
Figure 6

Experimental setup of hemispherical solar still (HSS) (Ismail 2009).

Figure 6

Experimental setup of hemispherical solar still (HSS) (Ismail 2009).

Close modal

‘V’ type solar still

Singh (2021) observed in solar stills only half of the top cover is effective when aligned with the solar latitude angle, while the other half is less effective when aligned with the solar latitude side. From the still's side of the system the water basin can receive more solar energy effectively and glazing effects. A second kind of solar desalination system was used by Selva Kumar et al. (2008); it included a ‘V’-shaped top glass covering, and the solar still was supported in four different ways, including with or without charcoal, boosting mirror or charcoal, or both. As shown in Figure 7, these combinations produce yields of 2.516, 3.226, 2.7, and 3.526 l/m2/day, respectively, with efficiency values of 24.47, 30.05, 11.92, and 14.11% in such a system.
Figure 7

Efficiency and daily yield variation with ‘V’ top (VTSS) system (Arunkumar et al. 2012).

Figure 7

Efficiency and daily yield variation with ‘V’ top (VTSS) system (Arunkumar et al. 2012).

Close modal

Painted inside surface with mixed TiO2

Kabeel et al. (2019a) exposed, till the research in solar still from the economic angle, nanoparticles of TiO2 are an economical way to mix with paint and paint on the inner surfaces of the basin. The availability of nanoparticles enhances the heat flow rate because of the enhanced thermal conductivity of the mixture as compared to without it. Such painted surface enhanced their absorbing capacity of solar and thermal energy. Such a concept enhances the evaporation rate of water and yields solar still. Nanoparticles can indeed enhance the heat flow rate and improve thermal conductivity when incorporated into a mixture or material. This phenomenon is commonly observed in nanofluids, which are liquids containing suspended nanoparticles. By adding nanoparticles to a mixture, such as a paint or coating, the thermal conductivity of the material can be significantly increased. This enhanced thermal conductivity allows for better heat transfer within the material, resulting in a higher heat flow rate. As a result, the material can absorb and distribute thermal energy more efficiently. When applied to the inner surfaces of solar still, these nanoparticle-enhanced coatings can enhance their absorbing capacity for both solar and thermal energy. The nanoparticles can help capture a greater amount of incoming solar radiation, converting it into thermal energy that can be utilized or stored. This makes the painted surface more effective at harnessing both types of energy.

Thermal conductivity of glass cover

Enhanced productivity of fresh water is a need of society and hence day by day research is happening. Condensation at the cover surface has an important role in this phenomenon. Condensation is based on the combination of convection and conduction heat transfer. Dimri et al. (2008) observed that the productivity of solar was further enhanced with a higher value of thermal conductivity of the cover surface. When the cover surface of a solar panel or solar thermal collector has higher thermal conductivity, it facilitates better heat transfer from the surface to the underlying components, such as the absorber or heat transfer fluid. To achieve higher thermal conductivity in the cover surface, various techniques can be employed but it's also important to consider other factors as well, such as cost, durability, and compatibility with the specific application, when selecting or designing the cover surface material.

Depth of water in single slope solar still

The thermal study is performed at two distinct water levels of 3 and 12 cm at an inclination of 23°, according to Prakash et al.’s (2021) analysis. When the water depth increases for the active mode of operation, the daily yield production rises. The daily output yield falls with increasing water depth and increases with increasing hew and hcw. When the evaporative surface temperature is higher and the condensing surface temperature is lower, the output of the solar still distillate increases. The optimal yield output is 0.23885 kg/h at 12 cm of water depth, while it is 0.13 kg/h at 3 cm.

Single solar still with porous structures

Shoeibi et al. (2022) observed the temperature gradient between the cover surface and water can be enhanced by water temperature in the basin with porous material which directly enhanced the productivity of the system. The effect of porous material on the performance of the pyramid solar still was assessed by Saravanavel et al. (2020) which shows enhanced results. The experiments were done with several pieces of clay pot and chalk as porous material at several hours of the day with a fixed depth (0.01 m) of saline water. To reduce the heat losses from the vertical side surfaces, they are covered with insulated glass walls. With the same climate condition, two different conventional and modified solar stills were compared. Their results show that the productivity of considering solar still with porous material was enhanced by 36% as compared with a traditional system. Srivastava & Agrawal (2013) experimented with enhanced solar still with porous fins. The experiments were done on a single slope solar still with old blackened cotton rags as a porous fin, which was located on the basin, as shown in Figure 8. In the experiment, the inclination of the glass cover is taken as 24°, which was equal to the latitude angle. As per the results of the experiment, it is shown that most of the solar radiation is received by porous fins due to which the evaporation rate increased. Besides, they observed that the productivity of water can be increased by a decrement in the depth of water in the still. The maximum productivity of freshwater of the same experimented system with porous fins was recorded as 7.5 kg/m2 in May.
Figure 8

Modified still using porous absorber (Shoeibi et al. 2022).

Figure 8

Modified still using porous absorber (Shoeibi et al. 2022).

Close modal

Performance evaluation of an integrated solar still system: exploring design parameters

Solar still with fins for condensation

Potable water is collected after condensing generated steam on the cover surface through both convective and conductive heat transfer. Solar stills with fins for condensation are a type of solar desalination system that utilize fins to enhance the condensation process. Solar stills are devices that use solar energy to evaporate water and then collect and condense the vapor to produce fresh water. Velmurugan & Srithar (2011) observed fins increase the surface area available for condensation, allowing for more efficient heat transfer, water vapor condensation in a single solar still, and efficiency enhancement by 45.5%. The extended surface area helps in maximizing the contact between the warm vapor and the cooler condensing surface, facilitating faster condensation and higher water production rates. The fins used in solar stills can be made from materials with good thermal conductivity to aid in the transfer of heat from the vapor to the condensing surface.

By introducing a pin fin into a paraffin wax bed of a single slope solar still it performed more productively. Such experiments are observed with several depths of water from 2 to 4 cm in a modified solar still where productivity was higher at 2 cm and also achieved yield 3,750 ml/m2 for modified solar still while for the same depth, the yield for conventional solar still was 3,017 ml/m2 (Suraparaju & Natarajan 2021a).

By incorporating fins, solar stills can enhance the condensation rate and improve the overall efficiency of the system. This can result in increased freshwater production, making it a beneficial approach for solar desalination in areas with limited access to freshwater resources. Fins are introduced to increase the heat transfer rate through convection, increasing condensing surface area and enhancing heat rejection to the surroundings. In solar stills, vapor loses its latent heat to the inclined cover surface. With the gravitational effect, it collects as freshwater found in comparative research between those with attached fins on a tray, as shown in Figure 9, and without fins with the maximum yield of 1.12 and 0.914 kg/m2, respectively (Velmurugan et al. 2008; Panchal & Mohan 2017).
Figure 9

Solar still with fins (Velmurugan & Srithar 2011).

Solar still with fan for condensation

A solar still with a fan is a type of solar desalination system that incorporates a fan or blower to enhance the evaporation and condensation processes. In a solar still with a fan, the fan is used to increase the airflow within the system. Suraparaju & Natarajan (2022a) investigate that the lower temperature of the cover glass surface of the solar still can enhance the condensation rate. After research on enhancing water evaporation, condensation also has an important role in producing fresh water. An et al. (2018) found vapor condenses on the cover surface as film-wise condensation or drop-wise condensation. The rate of condensation depends upon the heat transfer coefficient (h) of vapor over the surface. Increasing the value of h as the heat transfer coefficient of forced convection with the fan is a fruitful development, as shown in Figure 10. Solar stills with fans can be particularly useful in areas with low humidity or limited solar exposure, as they help overcome these challenges and improve the water production rates of the system.
Figure 10

Experimental setup with fan for condensation (Panchal & Mohan 2017).

Figure 10

Experimental setup with fan for condensation (Panchal & Mohan 2017).

Close modal

Solar still with several types of wicks

Psychometry also has an important role in the evaporation of water into a chamber caused by the global warming effect of solar radiation. Both condensation and evaporation occur at saturation temperature, directly linked to the pressure inside. The evaporation rate mainly depends upon the heating effect and partial pressure difference. A solar still with wicks is a type of solar desalination system that utilizes wicking materials to enhance the evaporation and condensation processes. In a solar still with wicks, the wicking materials are placed in contact with the saline or contaminated water source. These materials can be porous and have capillary action, allowing them to absorb and transport the water through the wick structure. As the water is drawn up the wicks, it is exposed to the surrounding air, promoting evaporation. The wicking action helps to increase surface area, heat transfer, facilitated condensation, etc. The wick floats on the water's surface, as shown in Figure 11, and increases partial pressure differently. Therefore, the wick enhanced the fresh water's evaporation rate and productivity (Suresh & Shanmugan 2019). Suraparaju et al. (2021b) analyzed an experimental work of single slope solar still with multiple floated fibers of better porosity over the surface seawater to increase the evaporation rate of water. The selection of the number of fibers is based on the percentage occupied surface area of the basin. The result of experimental work is optimized with 5 pond floated fiber and observed enhanced yield of solar still by 29.67% than without floated fiber, while with the use of 15 Luffaacutangula fibers (LAF), the productivity of fresh water is increased by 28.35% (Suraparaju & Natarajan 2021b).
Figure 11

Wick type solar still with different thermal conductivity of cover (Velmurugan et al. 2008).

Figure 11

Wick type solar still with different thermal conductivity of cover (Velmurugan et al. 2008).

Close modal

Suraparaju et al. researched better productivity of still with the use of ridge gourd natural fiber in the single slope solar still. Two identical SSSS are used to compare the impact of modification on productivity and the result found that such kind of modification has no impact on the productivity of solar stills (Suraparaju & Natarajan 2020).

Multi-basin solar still

In a study, Kaviti et al. (2016) discovered that multi-basin solar stills produced more fresh water than traditional sun stills. The fact that the multi-basin solar still collects and reuses the heat inside the still effectively served as strong evidence in favor of this. These stills feature multiple glazing layers covering the water's surface, thus the upper basin's evaporative heat is generated by the lower basin's convective heat. Numerous researchers are conducting extensive research in this field and changing still designs to increase their effectiveness. The MBSS for passive-type solar still is designed as shown in Figure 12 (Bapeshwararao et al. 1983).
Figure 12

Schematic diagram of a multi-effect passive-type solar still (An et al. 2018).

Figure 12

Schematic diagram of a multi-effect passive-type solar still (An et al. 2018).

Close modal

Tubular solar still

Singh (2021) observed that in comparison to SSSS, Tiwari & Selim (1984) showed that the tubular solar still (TSS) performs better over a longer period of time when there are no nighttime conditions because it allows for a bigger basin area and better evaporation. A TSS consists of a rectangular tray as a still basin in a tube that is covered. A model of TSSS with several wicks in place of a rectangular basin was provided by Kumar & Anand (1992). This desalting technology thus provides more space for condensation and superior results to SSSS. Then, Amimul et al. (2012) enhanced and provided TSSS in new design parameters with a basin of metal material covered by a thin film of vinyl chloride. The straightforward or traditional TSSS was performed after desalination. Due to the greater temperature difference between the basin water and the thin film tubular covering in this setup, the yield was improved. Then, Arunkumar et al. (2016) tested with TSSS undercooled or uncooled settings, together with PSS and CPC, and the successful findings were 7.77 l/m2/day yield. They also concluded that the system's heavy initial setup cost is offset by its overall enhanced efficiency and the distillate that results from it. Later, Arunkumar & Kabeel (2017) introduced PCM with TSS-CPC and analyzed TSS-CPC with PCM, and compared for without PCM; the results showed that TSS-CPC with PCM performed better, with a daily yield of 5.78 l/m2 compared to 5.33 l/m2 for TSS-CPC alone. The use of PCM, which provides continuous heat as supplemental thermal energy by altering its phase, allowed the system to operate more efficiently. As a result, latent heat from PCM was transferred to the basin liner between periods of cooling. In a recent study, Jing et al. examined concentric TSS, which consists of two layers, the outer of which has a wet wick and the inner of which is normal. As distillate output, the outcome was superior to the earlier TSS system. In comparison to other systems, TSS has superior solar radiation usability due to a smaller layer of basin water mass, and the usage of PCM expands its capability. Thus, superior output outcomes are obtained with appropriate PCM for TSS-CPC systems.

Multi-wick solar still

Tiwari & Selim (1984) provided one of the first analyses on the dual-slope multi-wick solar still (MWSS), which revealed higher yields but also higher investment values due to the system's more expensive use of components. Additionally, Singh & Tiwari (1992) provided a multi-effect MWSS with improved efficiency as a result of the use of a wick, which preserves a thin layer of water mass. In addition to using charcoal cloth as a thermal energy-storing medium, Mahdi et al. (2011) experimented on tilted WSS and published the results with a deeper understanding. Additionally, the work of Pal et al. (2015) was also favorably acknowledged in the field of MWSS, which was presented with minor modifications to traditional solar desalting units and stated to have extremely high performance. Then, Pal & Dev (2016) provided some adjustments to the double-slope traditional solar desalting system, which was successfully transformed into MWSS and exhibits noticeably higher efficiency and distillate output than straight distillers. Multiple wicks are used in these systems, but the effective system performs better for the same basin area because it uses better wick material and better heat storage materials. This system makes use of a variety of materials with qualities like porosity, non-reactivity with filthy water, elevated temperature sustainability, etc. The materials should be long-lasting, cost-effective, and appropriate for the system. Wick offers a very thin water film and promotes effective evaporation when exposed to direct or indirect sunlight. Wick can be positioned in a variety of directions or several configurations. Pal et al.'s (2017) modification to the double-slope solar desalting system includes the addition of transparent walls and multi-wicks (MW) in the basin. The experiment was carried out in the climate of Allahabad, as depicted in Figure 13(a). This still has a 2 m2 basin with a 2 cm level of water and a top cover that is oriented at a 15° angle. The updated design using jute and black cotton wick produced better outcomes, it was revealed. The yield production response and thermal efficiency for the two tests were, respectively, 9.012 and 7.040 l/m2/day, and 23.03 and 20.94%. Suraparaju & Natarajan 2022b) explore the impact of evaporation rate and condensation rate with an experimental setup where the evaporation rate is increased by using a novel pond fiber at the surface of the water at basin and a hollow finned absorber while the condensation is enhanced by decreasing the temperature of cover glass with a dripping arrangement of water. The results of the experiment analyzed that the water temperature of modified solar still enhanced by 12%, the glass cover temperature was decreased by 30% and the yield of solar still is enhanced by 126%. According to Ni et al. (2018), a low-cost solar distillation system and process that uses a floating wick (fabric wick) with the ability to reject salt because of its unique design, operating principle, and system mechanism, as illustrated in Figure 13(b). The pores of the filtration medium can become clogged by seawater's 3–3.5 wt% total dissolved solids, which include NaCl, CaCO3, etc. These holes are minimized here by corrugating the filtration medium and floating it over foam. Under one sun solar intensity circumstance, the system has an evaporation area of 21 × 20 cm2 and a condensation area of 55 × 55 cm2, respectively, with a 57% evaporation efficiency. Additionally, CFD modeling is used to demonstrate the desalting procedure and its results.
Figure 13

(a) Multiple wick solar desalination system; (b) floating wick solar desalination system (Jing et al.; Tiwari & Selim 1984).

Figure 13

(a) Multiple wick solar desalination system; (b) floating wick solar desalination system (Jing et al.; Tiwari & Selim 1984).

Close modal

Contactless solar steam generation and solar still

Cooper et al.'s (2018) novel idea for superheated steam is provided. In this experiment, the solar absorber does not come into direct contact with the water; instead, it is filled with solar radiation energy, which is then used to superheat the steam with 38% efficiency (under laboratory conditions) and distill water up to 2.5 l/m2 each day.

As opposed to this, Kashyap et al. (2019) demonstrated the circulating CO2 capture into a grapheme aerogel material for corresponding conversion into water and CaCO3 with the aid of solar localized heating for 1,000 W/m2 (one sun) solar intensity in a laboratory setting. Diffusion solar stills and weir-type solar stills function well in the various solar desalting systems represented by the body of work. It has a greater effective condensation and evaporation surface area with the lowest water mass at the basin liner or at the diffusion surface which directly leads to the corresponding result. Stills with CPC, FPCs, PCM, or additional condenser, etc. lead directly to the freshwater production under the same surface area of the basin (Singh & Gautam 2022).

Diffusion solar still

Much research has previously investigated different forms of diffusion solar still (DSS), primarily multi-effect horizontal, vertical, or inclined type DSS (Toyama et al. 1983, 1987; Elsayed 1986; Ouahes et al. 1987; Ohshiro et al. 1996; Bouchekima et al. 1998; Fukui et al. 2004). As a result of several flaws in past works that were discovered by researchers' ongoing examination, new concepts for designs are continually being developed nowadays. Hiroshi (Tanaka 2009) explored multi-DSS paired with FPC and provided the extension in earlier work. In his investigation of the specific type of DSS under conditions of maximum solar intensity, it was deemed an excellent result with a yield of 13.3 l/m2/day. Multi-DSS was described by Chong et al. (2014) together with a heat exchanger and connected to a vacuum-type solar spiral collector. In it, water absorbs extra heat; as a result, water temperature increases. This leads to increased evaporation, higher condensation, and higher production of up to 23.9 l/m2/day. In addition, Huang et al. (2015) introduced an improved spiral-type multi-effect DSS with specifications similar to those used in Chong et al. (2014) and reported improved highest distillate production of 40.6 l/m2/day based solely on solar absorber surface under standard test conditions as it simultaneously used directional as well as lateral diffusion to improve overall performance in terms of yield. The productivity of fresh water was captured as a 15.9 l/m2/day yield by Tanaka (2016) who took into account the multi-effects with vertical type DSS coupled with a slanted wick that produced good results in earlier studies (Chong et al. 2014). Tanaka (2017) presented a study based on different characteristics, such as dimensional parameters, and optimized it to produce better results. Tanaka & Iishi (2017) then rechecked this model through trials and recorded a sizable yield. Due to their diffusion channels (vertical, horizontal slanted, spiral multi-effect, etc.), DSS systems are quite effective. The efficiency of spiral solar collectors is higher and spiral multi-effect DSS with greater condensation and evaporation in the longitudinal and lateral orientations would raise the efficiency to a higher level. In contrast to conventional distillation procedures, the unique approach of DSS is used to create more distillates. The kind of DSS, such as a vertical, horizontal, or inclined type multi-effect DSS system, is determined by the orientation of the diffuser plate. In it, multiple plates are positioned so that there is an air gap between them, and the plates each have a wick that has been moistened either directly or by capillary action. Diffusion decontamination is the term used to describe how this distillation system operates: initially, heat from solar radiation enters the air opening, causing water to evaporate, diffuse, and condense into the space on its subsequent cold condensing plate (Rajaseenivasan et al. 2013). This technology produces more potable water because it uses greater surface areas for evaporation and condensation. In their research, Kaushal et al. (2017a) used vertical floating wick DSS. Figure 14 illustrates how well the concentrated salty water from the washbasin output was employed in this experiment to reheat the salty water at the input. Due to enhanced design and regular heat recovery, simple vertical multi-effect type DSS and proposed DSS with some alteration (floating wick) were compared with 21% more essence. Additionally, they discussed the economic analysis and correlation component, as well as the short payback period for the suggested approach (Kaushal et al. 2017b). The proposed technique uses thermal coal as the cotton wick's floating medium. The suggested system comprises a 1.5 × 0.77 m2 basin area, 1.52 × 0.68 m2 diffusion plate regions, spaced 10 mm apart, and a 2 cm water level maintained inside. Due to greater heat resurrection through the heat exchanger continuously, as illustrated in Figure 15, it was claimed that the yield was also better at night, measuring 0.98 l/m2/day from the traditional model and 1.34 l/m2/day from the experimental model.
Figure 14

Diffusion solar still (DSS) with floating wick (Tanaka 2009).

Figure 14

Diffusion solar still (DSS) with floating wick (Tanaka 2009).

Close modal
Figure 15

Variation of efficiency and productivity with respect to time of diffusion solar still (Chong et al. 2014).

Figure 15

Variation of efficiency and productivity with respect to time of diffusion solar still (Chong et al. 2014).

Close modal

Weir-type solar still

Sadineni et al. (2008) conducted an experimental and theoretical analysis of the solar desalting weir-type system and found that it performed 20% better than conventional distillers and had a good correlation coefficient. This is because the system has a greater area for evaporation with less glazing, a lower depth of water in the basin, and a continuous flow of water that recovers more and more heat. Following that, Tabrizi et al. (2010) introduced a PCM-assisted solar desalination weir cascade-type system. Observation showed low mass flow rates with and without PCM on clear and hazy days, with the clear day without PCM producing higher distillate as the preferred outcome. The study by Zoori et al. (2013) included a comparison using the same model as in Figure 16 but without a PCM. This study was replicated, validated by an experimental investigation and was found to be well-aligned. Better output is attributed to weir solar stills, which operate on a thin water layer maintained at the basin liner, as opposed to weir stills supplemented with PCM and water loop, which reduce heat loss and ultimately produce a significantly higher yield. Sarhadi et al. (2017) examined various parameters in various air conditions and took into consideration the cascade-type weir solar still system depicted with phase change material and compared it to the identical model without phase change material. A good agreement was used to validate the findings. It was determined that cascade WSDS with PCM performs better in semi-hazy conditions because PCM adds additional heat to the basin water, which is what causes a higher yield. Additionally, a PCM-free system operates better on a clear day. As indicated in Figure 17, the equivalent findings were 76.69% maximum efficiency and 7.05 l/m2 of potable water per day. Natarajan et al. (2022) proposed enhanced solar still by considering nature-friendly and low-cost materials such as sawdust, rice husk, molasses, and so on with higher yield and enhanced rate of evaporation. Such enhanced solar still performs with 34.81% higher evaporation rate than conventional solar still.
Figure 16

Weir solar desalination system cascade type with PCM (Tanaka 2017).

Figure 16

Weir solar desalination system cascade type with PCM (Tanaka 2017).

Close modal
Figure 17

Efficiency variation with and without PCM for weir solar still cascade type on clear and hazy days (Tanaka & Iishi 2017).

Figure 17

Efficiency variation with and without PCM for weir solar still cascade type on clear and hazy days (Tanaka & Iishi 2017).

Close modal

Tubular solar still

Distillation takes place in a long tube that has a rectangular tray filled with water mass in this solar desalination system. This technique does not require separate sun tracking equipment, though optional components like a parabolic concentrator can enhance the outcomes. Arunkumar et al. (2013) experimented on a TSS with a concentrator and two 0.03 m2 basin areas, and they discovered noteworthy outcomes for three conditions: (i) yield with no cooling, (ii) yield with air cooling, and (iii) yield with water cooling, all of which were carried out in the Coimbatore climate, as shown in Figure 18. The observed results for items (i), (ii), and (iii) were, respectively, 2.05, 3.05, and 5.0 l/m2/day. Following that, Elashmawy (2017) investigated TSS using three different combinations, including TSS filled with salty water and a black cloth wick in the first, TSS without a wick in the second, and TSS with CPC and a solar tracking device in the third. It had daily yields of 4.71, 3.60, and 3.35 l/m2 with per day efficiencies of 36.5, 30.5, and 28.5% for basin surfaces of 0.59 m2. As more solar thermal energy is absorbed by the black wick, higher condensation and evaporation occur, producing more fresh water, making the first combination perform better.
Figure 18

Tubular solar still (TSS) (Rajaseenivasan et al. 2013).

Stepped-type inclined solar still

Several solar still designs that used a storage tank for continuous water circulation in stepped solar stills (STSS) to extend production many times were analyzed (El-Agouz 2014; Kabeel et al. 2019b). The STSS absorber plate has a surface area of 1 m2, which is separated into 10 equal steps. The feed water (i) seawater and (ii) salt water, and the basin conditions (i) black absorber basin and (ii) cotton absorber basin were changed during the experiments. Black absorber STSS is experimentally explored in the first case of basin circumstances, and the outcomes were compared with simple solar still (SSS). It has been determined that the STSS and SSS black absorbers' daily efficacy for desalinating seawater is 61 and 42%, respectively, and for desalinating saltwater is 55 and 37%. In the second instance, a cotton absorber is used in place of the black absorber. According to the experimental findings, the STSS and SSS cotton absorbers' daily efficacy for desalinating seawater is 61 and 40%, respectively, and for desalinating saltwater, it is 70 and 48%. For seawater desalination and saltwater desalination, respectively, the black absorber STSS enhances the freshwater production rate by up to 43 and 48% more than that of SSS. For seawater and saltwater desalination, respectively, cotton absorber STSS enhances the freshwater production rate by up to 53 and 47% more than that of SSS. STSS using seawater as the intake yielded 6.1 and 6.3 kg/m2/day in yield.

Various types of single slope simple solar stills (SSSS) have been discussed along with SSSS and the overall performances of SSSS. The variations between productivity and efficiency show the effective performance of solar water still, that's why it is recognized easily, the worth of full solar desalination among all the respective parameters under conditions for simple and integrated solar still. The summarized observed data show that cascade-type weir solar desalination systems with and without PCM, multi-step solar still with multiple absorbers are better while weir solar still system without PCM performs more effectively with 3.05% yield and 5.96% efficiency due to the effective utilization of collected solar energy to evaporate saline water at the same time. SSSS performs effectively with 24% more productivity per unit area of basin per day while most of the part is at a mid-time. PSS performs efficiently because PSS does not require any solar tracking machine for solar energy because of its design. This has a per day average efficiency of 45% with distillate as 4.01 l/m2/day at $ 0.065/l rate. Variations in the performance of various NSDSs based on its novelty, working principle, different physical parameters, utilized material (smart materials, nanoparticles, etc.), designing concepts, and intensity of solar radiation per confined laboratory conditions and open atmospheric conditions. Singh (2021) analyzed new conceptual designs with enhanced techniques with creative novelty representing better performance, as nanoporous aluminum oxide membrane with Au nanoparticles solar distillations system gives better performance by 11.4 l/m2/day for one solar intensity due to the wide band of absorption of solar radiation delivering huge heat to evaporated and regularly more distillation. On the same side, a self-assembled plasmatic absorber (restricted porous substance filled Au/NPs) solar still system and affordable narrow gap solar evaporation and still system perform efficiently with more efficiency by 90% because of its restricted specialty, i.e. initial system has tightly packed NPs in the membrane which design a porous structure suitable for taking all spectral solar intensities and for another case, still was concentrated via parabolic concentrator and this concentrated solar radiation heat is received by smart material which is further consumed to evaporate water via a narrow void under the affected of localized heat that helps the performance of the improved system. It is observed that improved heat transfer through various parameters helps in several ways as also mentioned in Tables 1 and 2.

Table 1

Performance observations of various solar still systems

Solar still systemsEnhanced parameterMaximum solar radiation (W/m2)Efficiency (%)Productivity (L/m2/day)Concluding remarksAdvantagesLimitations
Double slope (Murugavel et al. 2010Single basin double-slope solar still with minimum depth, energy-storing material 740 6.2 – The production rate of potable water depends on the cover glass, water, and surrounding temperatures, temperature difference between water and glass, and temperature difference between glass – surrounding and stored energy. Yield can be enhanced with economical additional expenses. Regular maintenance required of energy-stored material due to the salinity of water. 
Double slope and double basin (Rajaseenivasan & Murugavel 2013Experimental analysis of double-slope solar still with single basin and double basin 900 85 4.75 The productive rate of double basin solar still is greater than that of single basin still by approximately. 85% for the same basin condition. The productivity of modern still enhanced with small changes in design. Cleaning is required on daily basis. 
Double-slope solar (Belhadj et al. 2015Coupled with capillary film condenser 900 58 7.15 Productive rate of freshwater increases with the decreasing flow feeding of saline water in still.
Productive rate of fresh water varies conversely with the gap between those two condensing plates. 
Yield of solar still increases and can be regulated Need to monitor the flow rate of water. 
Pyramid collector solar still (Sathyamurthy et al. 2014Analysis of factors affecting triangular pyramid solar still 830 15.5 4.701 Water depth in the basin, heat transfer coefficient of convection and evaporation, temperature difference between the convective and evaporative surface, etc. Effects are important for productivity. Productivity of solar still can be regulated with economical changes There is a limitation in the enhancement of solar still. 
Black paint (Kabeel (Sathyamurthy et al. 2020)) With 10% of nanoparticles
With 20% of nanoparticles 
1,030 27.2
34.3 
– Evaporation rate of water in the solar still majorly influenced by the absorber plate, with an enhanced heat rate. Enhanced rate of evaporation of water has an important role in the productivity of fresh water. Impact of paint on the surface has a limited life.
Economically, it is optimized because of nanoparticles. 
Spherical solar (Dhiman 1988With spherical cover glass and blackened metallic horizontal basin plate 730 33 5.7 Spherical solar still has more efficiency than conventional during sunshine while after sunshine both stills have equal efficiency.
Due to the effect of cooling water only, the productivity was increased by 25% with enhanced condensation (Suraparaju & Natarajan 2022a
For sunshine duration and per day productivity, both are higher for spherical solar still than convention solar still Fabrication cost is high. 
Hemi spherical solar still (Arunkumar et al. 2012Without water cooling at the top
With water cooling at the top 
748 34
42 
– The productivity rate depends upon the temperature of the top cover, water, and atmospheric conditions During a high sunshine period, productivity is also high due to the enhanced convection rate of cooling. Additional cost and maintenance are limitations. 
‘V’ type solar still (Selva Kumar et al. 2008Eff without charcoal
Eff with Charcoal
Eff with mirror
Eff with mirror and charcoal 
970 24.47
30.05
11.92
14.11 
2.516
3.226
2.7
3.526 
Enhanced still receives more solar energy effectively and more glazing effect Yield enhanced with economic enhancement. Regular monitoring is required 
Single solar still with different depths of water in the basin (Prakash et al. 2021A 23° inclination is used for the thermal investigation, which is done at two different water levels of 3 and 12 cm. 1,000 81.53 – The daily output yield falls with increasing water depth and increases with increasing hew and hcw Economically, it is the better way to enhance the productivity of solar still. It is hard to maintain a small depth of water in basin. 
Single solar still with porous (Saravanavel et al. 2020Huang (et al. 2015) use porous material to increase efficiency.  36 7.5 According to Kaushal et al. (2017b), porous materials raise the temperature of the water in the basin which increases the temperature differential between the cover and the water and boosts the system's productivity. Economically, porous material is good for enhancing evaporation rate of water. Need to regular cleaning of porous material due to the salinity of water. 
Solar still with fins (Velmurugan & Srithar 2011Single basin solar still with attached fins (Kaushal et al. 2017b1,130 45.5 – Solar still with PCM, without PCM, and nanoparticles in the liner basin helps to increase the temperatures of the fins with cotton wick (FWCW)/fin with jute wick (FWJW) Enhanced the yield of solar still with high impact To be more effective, mixture of PCM and water should be stirred on a regular basis 
Solar still with fin and wick (Suresh & Shanmugan 2019Effective productivity with fin and cotton wick with flowing of water 1,130 13.37 9.429 Observation on experimental setup with fin and cotton wick, fin and jute wick, and PCM Productivity rate of solar still enhanced Fabrication and design impact on cost.
Required cleaning due to the salinity of water. 
Single slope solar still with pin fin into a paraffin wax bed (Suraparaju & Natarajan 2021aEnhanced yield of single-slope solar still with fins at several depth of water in basin – 24.3 3750 Attached pin fin at the wax surface and small depth of water in basin enhanced the evaporation rate and yield of solar sill Productivity enhanced with small and easy modification Wax surface needs cleaning due to salinity and impurities of water in basin 
Multi-basin solar still (MBSS) (Kaviti et al. 2016; Bapeshwararao et al. 1983Double basin carries water at different temperatures 800 – – The lower basin water temperature shows more effect than that of the upper basin. Yield of solar still enhanced. Required regular cleaning of basins. 
Tubular solar still (TSS) (Singh (2021)Distillation occurs in a long tube with a rectangular water tray 1,159 More than SSSS 2.05
3.05
5.00 
Yield without cooling
Yield with air cooling
Yield with water cooling 
Yield of solar sill is much better for commercial purposes. Economically, design and manufacturing costs do not support this. 
TSS-CPC with PCM
TSS-CPC without PCM 
800
800 
 5.78
5.33 
TSS has outer and inner layers where the outer layer contains wet wick while the inner is usual. 
Multi-wick solar still (MWSS) (Sathyamurthy et al. 2014; Suraparaju & Natarajan 2021b; Suraparaju & Natarajan 2020With Jute wick
With cotton
With floated fiber (Suraparaju & Natarajan 2021b
1198 23.
20.94
29.67 
9.012
7.040 
A range of materials with properties like porosity, resistance to corrosive water, high-temperature, covered area by fiber, sustainability, etc., are used in this system. The materials ought to be durable, economical, and suitable for the system. When exposed to either direct or indirect sunlight, the wick offers an extremely thin water coating and facilitates efficient evaporation. Economically solar still enhanced and required less maintenance Regular cleaning of jute and cotton is necessary due to the salinity of water. 
CSSGSS (Cooper et al. 2018Solar radiation is used to preheat the steam instead of heating water (Cooper et al. 2018485  2.5 The efficiency of performance of the solar still structure is achieved as 24.6% at 01 Sun and 38.8% at 1.5 Suns. Such solar still has better yield. Need for more safety because of fragile setup 
Diffusion solar still (DSS) (Tanaka 2009; Chong et al. 2014; Huang et al. 2015; Tanaka 2016A vertical multiple effect diffusion solar still (Tanaka 2009890 13.3  Consisting of closely spaced vertical and parallel partitions in contact with saline-soaked wick Less space is required comparatively.
Enhanced both evaporation and condensation of water. 
Complex design and manufacturing impact on cost optimization.
Maintenance and precaution required on necessary action. 
Multiple effect diffusion solar still with vacuum tube collector and heat pipe (Chong et al. 2014900 23.9  Another aspect that contributes to great productivity is the MDU's symmetrical design, which reduces heat loss. The bended-plate design of MDU prevents wick peel-off and pollution of clean water. In the continuous operation for 6 months, no decline in performance was seen. 
Spiral multiple effect diffusion solar still coupled with vacuum tube collector and heat pipe (Huang et al. 20151,010 40.6  Greater heat and mass transfer may occur in the outer cell because of the bigger evaporating and condensing area there. 
Vertical multiple effect diffusion solar still coupled with a titled wick still (Tanaka 2016900  15.9 Analysis of three different types of days the spring equinox, summer, and winter solstices at 33° N latitude. 
Weir-type solar still (WTSS) This type of solar water still is proposed to regenerate rejected water from the water purifier systems for solar hydrogen production (Sadineni et al. 2008). 1,000 20 – The industrial production of distilled water is proposed to use weir-type regenerative solar still. The solar hydrogen projects can utilize the suggested still. In a still of this kind, a sizable portion of the de-ionized water that was rejected may be distilled and recovered. Required less observation with enhanced yield of solar still.
It can be established from industrial point of view. 
Such kinds of solar still are not designed for low sunshine. 
A cascade-type weir solar water still with built-in latent heat thermal energy storage system (Tabrizi et al. 2010610  3.4 On sunny days, the overall production of the still without LHTESS is marginally greater than the still with LHTESS. 
A cascade WSDS with PCM was observed in semi-hazy conditions (Sarhadi et al. 2017). 815  7.05 The evaluated efficiency is 76.69%.
A useful parameter for solar still design and optimization is energy efficiency. Exergy analysis reduces internal irreversibility rates, which is more significant than other optimization techniques. 
A solar still is proposed with nature friendly and low-cost material (Natarajan et al. 2022 34.81  Eco-friendly and economical materials are introduced to the enhanced yield of solar still such as saw dust, molasses, rice husk, etc. 
Tubular solar still (TSS) TSS with no cooling (Arunkumar et al. 2013)
TSS with air cooling
TSS with water cooling 
1,159  2.05
3.05
5.00 
A unique design for a tubular solar still that uses a rectangular basin to desalinate water as air and water flow over the cover.
The concentric tubular solar still with cold water flow, which is 144% more productive than the regular CPC-CTSS without air or water flow, has the highest production. 
Yield of solar still is enhanced by 144%.
As on requirement productivity can be regulated also. 
Due to the complex design of setup, maintenance and manufacturing are not economically fine. 
TSS Black cloth wick (Elashmawy 2017)
TSS without wick
TSS with CPC 
1,010 36.5
30.5
28.5 
4.71
3.60
3.35 
The first setup works more effectively because the black wick absorbs more solar thermal energy, which increases the rate of evaporation, condensation, and yields large distillate. 
Stepped-type inclined solar still (STSS) Black absorber STSS
For seawater
For saltwater 
910 43
48 
 Per day efficiency for modified stepped solar still is more than that for conventional solar still approximately by 20%.
The efficiency of all kinds of solar still is greater for seawater as compared to salt water. 
Simple and smooth modification in setup to improve the productivity of solar still. Regular cleaning is required for better yield. 
Cotton absorber STSS
For seawater
For saltwater 
910 53
47 
6.126
6.285 
 
Solar still systemsEnhanced parameterMaximum solar radiation (W/m2)Efficiency (%)Productivity (L/m2/day)Concluding remarksAdvantagesLimitations
Double slope (Murugavel et al. 2010Single basin double-slope solar still with minimum depth, energy-storing material 740 6.2 – The production rate of potable water depends on the cover glass, water, and surrounding temperatures, temperature difference between water and glass, and temperature difference between glass – surrounding and stored energy. Yield can be enhanced with economical additional expenses. Regular maintenance required of energy-stored material due to the salinity of water. 
Double slope and double basin (Rajaseenivasan & Murugavel 2013Experimental analysis of double-slope solar still with single basin and double basin 900 85 4.75 The productive rate of double basin solar still is greater than that of single basin still by approximately. 85% for the same basin condition. The productivity of modern still enhanced with small changes in design. Cleaning is required on daily basis. 
Double-slope solar (Belhadj et al. 2015Coupled with capillary film condenser 900 58 7.15 Productive rate of freshwater increases with the decreasing flow feeding of saline water in still.
Productive rate of fresh water varies conversely with the gap between those two condensing plates. 
Yield of solar still increases and can be regulated Need to monitor the flow rate of water. 
Pyramid collector solar still (Sathyamurthy et al. 2014Analysis of factors affecting triangular pyramid solar still 830 15.5 4.701 Water depth in the basin, heat transfer coefficient of convection and evaporation, temperature difference between the convective and evaporative surface, etc. Effects are important for productivity. Productivity of solar still can be regulated with economical changes There is a limitation in the enhancement of solar still. 
Black paint (Kabeel (Sathyamurthy et al. 2020)) With 10% of nanoparticles
With 20% of nanoparticles 
1,030 27.2
34.3 
– Evaporation rate of water in the solar still majorly influenced by the absorber plate, with an enhanced heat rate. Enhanced rate of evaporation of water has an important role in the productivity of fresh water. Impact of paint on the surface has a limited life.
Economically, it is optimized because of nanoparticles. 
Spherical solar (Dhiman 1988With spherical cover glass and blackened metallic horizontal basin plate 730 33 5.7 Spherical solar still has more efficiency than conventional during sunshine while after sunshine both stills have equal efficiency.
Due to the effect of cooling water only, the productivity was increased by 25% with enhanced condensation (Suraparaju & Natarajan 2022a
For sunshine duration and per day productivity, both are higher for spherical solar still than convention solar still Fabrication cost is high. 
Hemi spherical solar still (Arunkumar et al. 2012Without water cooling at the top
With water cooling at the top 
748 34
42 
– The productivity rate depends upon the temperature of the top cover, water, and atmospheric conditions During a high sunshine period, productivity is also high due to the enhanced convection rate of cooling. Additional cost and maintenance are limitations. 
‘V’ type solar still (Selva Kumar et al. 2008Eff without charcoal
Eff with Charcoal
Eff with mirror
Eff with mirror and charcoal 
970 24.47
30.05
11.92
14.11 
2.516
3.226
2.7
3.526 
Enhanced still receives more solar energy effectively and more glazing effect Yield enhanced with economic enhancement. Regular monitoring is required 
Single solar still with different depths of water in the basin (Prakash et al. 2021A 23° inclination is used for the thermal investigation, which is done at two different water levels of 3 and 12 cm. 1,000 81.53 – The daily output yield falls with increasing water depth and increases with increasing hew and hcw Economically, it is the better way to enhance the productivity of solar still. It is hard to maintain a small depth of water in basin. 
Single solar still with porous (Saravanavel et al. 2020Huang (et al. 2015) use porous material to increase efficiency.  36 7.5 According to Kaushal et al. (2017b), porous materials raise the temperature of the water in the basin which increases the temperature differential between the cover and the water and boosts the system's productivity. Economically, porous material is good for enhancing evaporation rate of water. Need to regular cleaning of porous material due to the salinity of water. 
Solar still with fins (Velmurugan & Srithar 2011Single basin solar still with attached fins (Kaushal et al. 2017b1,130 45.5 – Solar still with PCM, without PCM, and nanoparticles in the liner basin helps to increase the temperatures of the fins with cotton wick (FWCW)/fin with jute wick (FWJW) Enhanced the yield of solar still with high impact To be more effective, mixture of PCM and water should be stirred on a regular basis 
Solar still with fin and wick (Suresh & Shanmugan 2019Effective productivity with fin and cotton wick with flowing of water 1,130 13.37 9.429 Observation on experimental setup with fin and cotton wick, fin and jute wick, and PCM Productivity rate of solar still enhanced Fabrication and design impact on cost.
Required cleaning due to the salinity of water. 
Single slope solar still with pin fin into a paraffin wax bed (Suraparaju & Natarajan 2021aEnhanced yield of single-slope solar still with fins at several depth of water in basin – 24.3 3750 Attached pin fin at the wax surface and small depth of water in basin enhanced the evaporation rate and yield of solar sill Productivity enhanced with small and easy modification Wax surface needs cleaning due to salinity and impurities of water in basin 
Multi-basin solar still (MBSS) (Kaviti et al. 2016; Bapeshwararao et al. 1983Double basin carries water at different temperatures 800 – – The lower basin water temperature shows more effect than that of the upper basin. Yield of solar still enhanced. Required regular cleaning of basins. 
Tubular solar still (TSS) (Singh (2021)Distillation occurs in a long tube with a rectangular water tray 1,159 More than SSSS 2.05
3.05
5.00 
Yield without cooling
Yield with air cooling
Yield with water cooling 
Yield of solar sill is much better for commercial purposes. Economically, design and manufacturing costs do not support this. 
TSS-CPC with PCM
TSS-CPC without PCM 
800
800 
 5.78
5.33 
TSS has outer and inner layers where the outer layer contains wet wick while the inner is usual. 
Multi-wick solar still (MWSS) (Sathyamurthy et al. 2014; Suraparaju & Natarajan 2021b; Suraparaju & Natarajan 2020With Jute wick
With cotton
With floated fiber (Suraparaju & Natarajan 2021b
1198 23.
20.94
29.67 
9.012
7.040 
A range of materials with properties like porosity, resistance to corrosive water, high-temperature, covered area by fiber, sustainability, etc., are used in this system. The materials ought to be durable, economical, and suitable for the system. When exposed to either direct or indirect sunlight, the wick offers an extremely thin water coating and facilitates efficient evaporation. Economically solar still enhanced and required less maintenance Regular cleaning of jute and cotton is necessary due to the salinity of water. 
CSSGSS (Cooper et al. 2018Solar radiation is used to preheat the steam instead of heating water (Cooper et al. 2018485  2.5 The efficiency of performance of the solar still structure is achieved as 24.6% at 01 Sun and 38.8% at 1.5 Suns. Such solar still has better yield. Need for more safety because of fragile setup 
Diffusion solar still (DSS) (Tanaka 2009; Chong et al. 2014; Huang et al. 2015; Tanaka 2016A vertical multiple effect diffusion solar still (Tanaka 2009890 13.3  Consisting of closely spaced vertical and parallel partitions in contact with saline-soaked wick Less space is required comparatively.
Enhanced both evaporation and condensation of water. 
Complex design and manufacturing impact on cost optimization.
Maintenance and precaution required on necessary action. 
Multiple effect diffusion solar still with vacuum tube collector and heat pipe (Chong et al. 2014900 23.9  Another aspect that contributes to great productivity is the MDU's symmetrical design, which reduces heat loss. The bended-plate design of MDU prevents wick peel-off and pollution of clean water. In the continuous operation for 6 months, no decline in performance was seen. 
Spiral multiple effect diffusion solar still coupled with vacuum tube collector and heat pipe (Huang et al. 20151,010 40.6  Greater heat and mass transfer may occur in the outer cell because of the bigger evaporating and condensing area there. 
Vertical multiple effect diffusion solar still coupled with a titled wick still (Tanaka 2016900  15.9 Analysis of three different types of days the spring equinox, summer, and winter solstices at 33° N latitude. 
Weir-type solar still (WTSS) This type of solar water still is proposed to regenerate rejected water from the water purifier systems for solar hydrogen production (Sadineni et al. 2008). 1,000 20 – The industrial production of distilled water is proposed to use weir-type regenerative solar still. The solar hydrogen projects can utilize the suggested still. In a still of this kind, a sizable portion of the de-ionized water that was rejected may be distilled and recovered. Required less observation with enhanced yield of solar still.
It can be established from industrial point of view. 
Such kinds of solar still are not designed for low sunshine. 
A cascade-type weir solar water still with built-in latent heat thermal energy storage system (Tabrizi et al. 2010610  3.4 On sunny days, the overall production of the still without LHTESS is marginally greater than the still with LHTESS. 
A cascade WSDS with PCM was observed in semi-hazy conditions (Sarhadi et al. 2017). 815  7.05 The evaluated efficiency is 76.69%.
A useful parameter for solar still design and optimization is energy efficiency. Exergy analysis reduces internal irreversibility rates, which is more significant than other optimization techniques. 
A solar still is proposed with nature friendly and low-cost material (Natarajan et al. 2022 34.81  Eco-friendly and economical materials are introduced to the enhanced yield of solar still such as saw dust, molasses, rice husk, etc. 
Tubular solar still (TSS) TSS with no cooling (Arunkumar et al. 2013)
TSS with air cooling
TSS with water cooling 
1,159  2.05
3.05
5.00 
A unique design for a tubular solar still that uses a rectangular basin to desalinate water as air and water flow over the cover.
The concentric tubular solar still with cold water flow, which is 144% more productive than the regular CPC-CTSS without air or water flow, has the highest production. 
Yield of solar still is enhanced by 144%.
As on requirement productivity can be regulated also. 
Due to the complex design of setup, maintenance and manufacturing are not economically fine. 
TSS Black cloth wick (Elashmawy 2017)
TSS without wick
TSS with CPC 
1,010 36.5
30.5
28.5 
4.71
3.60
3.35 
The first setup works more effectively because the black wick absorbs more solar thermal energy, which increases the rate of evaporation, condensation, and yields large distillate. 
Stepped-type inclined solar still (STSS) Black absorber STSS
For seawater
For saltwater 
910 43
48 
 Per day efficiency for modified stepped solar still is more than that for conventional solar still approximately by 20%.
The efficiency of all kinds of solar still is greater for seawater as compared to salt water. 
Simple and smooth modification in setup to improve the productivity of solar still. Regular cleaning is required for better yield. 
Cotton absorber STSS
For seawater
For saltwater 
910 53
47 
6.126
6.285 
 
Table 2

Wick specified solar stills with performance enhancement observations

Solar stillsEnhancementConcluding observationFocused objectives
Double-slope solar still (Murugavel et al. 2010Efficiency increased by 6.2% The amount of potable water produced is influenced by the temperature of the water, glass cover, and the atmosphere, as well as the temperature difference between the glass and the water and the atmosphere. To improve the rate of evaporation of water on the fixed-size bottom surface area of the basin. 
Pyramid collector solar still (Sathyamurthy et al. 2014Efficiency increased by 15.5% Productivity factors include water depth in the basin, the heat transfer coefficient between convection and evaporation, the temperature difference between the convection and evaporation surface, and others. To improve the rate of evaporation of water on the fixed-size bottom surface area of the basin. 
Spherical solar (Dhiman 1988Efficiency increased by 33% When it is sunny, spherical solar panels are still more efficient than traditional ones, but when the sun sets, both systems are still equally efficient.
Only the cooling water's effect led to a 25% boost in output. 
To improve the rate of evaporation of water on the fixed-size bottom surface area of the basin. 
SSSS with different water depths in the basin (Kabeel et al. 2019aEfficiency increased by 81.53% The daily output yield increases with increasing water depth and with increasing hew and hcwRequired less observation regarding maintenance during running conditions as compared to using nanoparticles. 
Multi-wick solar still (MWSS) (Sathyamurthy et al. 2014Efficiency increased by 23.03% with jute wick and 20.94% with cotton wick This system uses a variety of materials with properties including porosity, resistance to corrosive water, high-temperature durability, etc. Long-lasting, economical, and system-appropriate materials are required. When exposed to direct or indirect sunlight, the wick provides a very thin water coating and encourages effective evaporation. To improve the rate of evaporation of water as well as condensation appeared as distilled water with analysis on psychometric terms. 
Single solar still with porous (Saravanavel et al. 2020Efficiency increased by 36% Porous materials, according to Shoeibi et al. (Kaushal et al. 2017b), increase the temperature of the water, which raises the temperature differential between the cover and the water and improves the efficiency of the system. To design a more economically efficient system than contemporary nanoparticles-based solar distillation units. 
Single solar still with floated fiber (Suraparaju & Natarajan 2021bEfficiency increased by 29.67% Suraparaju et al. (2021b) and Suraparaju & Natarajan (2021b) introduced modern solar still with floated fibers with high porosity and observed efficiency at several numbers of fiber and optimized five-floated fiber-enhanced maximum efficiency. To improve the rate of evaporation of water on the fixed-size bottom surface area of the basin and design a more economically efficient system. 
Solar stillsEnhancementConcluding observationFocused objectives
Double-slope solar still (Murugavel et al. 2010Efficiency increased by 6.2% The amount of potable water produced is influenced by the temperature of the water, glass cover, and the atmosphere, as well as the temperature difference between the glass and the water and the atmosphere. To improve the rate of evaporation of water on the fixed-size bottom surface area of the basin. 
Pyramid collector solar still (Sathyamurthy et al. 2014Efficiency increased by 15.5% Productivity factors include water depth in the basin, the heat transfer coefficient between convection and evaporation, the temperature difference between the convection and evaporation surface, and others. To improve the rate of evaporation of water on the fixed-size bottom surface area of the basin. 
Spherical solar (Dhiman 1988Efficiency increased by 33% When it is sunny, spherical solar panels are still more efficient than traditional ones, but when the sun sets, both systems are still equally efficient.
Only the cooling water's effect led to a 25% boost in output. 
To improve the rate of evaporation of water on the fixed-size bottom surface area of the basin. 
SSSS with different water depths in the basin (Kabeel et al. 2019aEfficiency increased by 81.53% The daily output yield increases with increasing water depth and with increasing hew and hcwRequired less observation regarding maintenance during running conditions as compared to using nanoparticles. 
Multi-wick solar still (MWSS) (Sathyamurthy et al. 2014Efficiency increased by 23.03% with jute wick and 20.94% with cotton wick This system uses a variety of materials with properties including porosity, resistance to corrosive water, high-temperature durability, etc. Long-lasting, economical, and system-appropriate materials are required. When exposed to direct or indirect sunlight, the wick provides a very thin water coating and encourages effective evaporation. To improve the rate of evaporation of water as well as condensation appeared as distilled water with analysis on psychometric terms. 
Single solar still with porous (Saravanavel et al. 2020Efficiency increased by 36% Porous materials, according to Shoeibi et al. (Kaushal et al. 2017b), increase the temperature of the water, which raises the temperature differential between the cover and the water and improves the efficiency of the system. To design a more economically efficient system than contemporary nanoparticles-based solar distillation units. 
Single solar still with floated fiber (Suraparaju & Natarajan 2021bEfficiency increased by 29.67% Suraparaju et al. (2021b) and Suraparaju & Natarajan (2021b) introduced modern solar still with floated fibers with high porosity and observed efficiency at several numbers of fiber and optimized five-floated fiber-enhanced maximum efficiency. To improve the rate of evaporation of water on the fixed-size bottom surface area of the basin and design a more economically efficient system. 

Enhanced absorption: A covered surface with higher thermal conductivity can more effectively transfer absorbed solar energy to the underlying absorber material. This allows for better utilization of the incident sunlight, resulting in increased energy absorption and overall productivity of the solar system.

Reduced temperature gradients: Efficient heat transfer helps in reducing temperature gradients across the cover surface. This is particularly important for solar panels or collectors because high-temperature gradients can lead to thermal stress, which can degrade the performance and lifespan of the system. By minimizing temperature differentials, a cover surface with higher thermal conductivity promotes more uniform heating and reduces the risk of localized hotspots.

Faster heat dissipation: In solar thermal systems, faster heat dissipation from the cover surface improves thermal management and prevents overheating. When the cover surface can efficiently transfer heat to the surroundings, it helps maintain optimal operating temperatures, which leads to improved overall system performance.

Increased surface area: By spreading the water across a larger surface area through the wicks, the solar still increases the exposure to the surrounding air. This enables a greater surface area for evaporation, leading to enhanced water vapor production.

Improved heat transfer: The wicking materials can help in efficient heat transfer within the system. As the water evaporates from the wicks, it absorbs heat from the surrounding environment, including solar energy. The wicks facilitate the movement of water and heat, ensuring a continuous supply of water for evaporation.

Facilitated condensation: Once the water vapor is generated, it needs to be condensed to produce fresh water. The wicking materials can also play a role in the condensation process. They can act as condensation surfaces or provide a structure on which the condensed water droplets can accumulate and flow down into a collection area.

Based on the above study, a frame of conclusion has been made accordingly:

  • i.

    Conventional single-slope stills are effective in summer weather conditions and vice versa for double-slope solar stills.

  • ii.

    The modified solar stills perform better according to the augmentation of active components and effective design considerations under suitable meteorological conditions.

  • iii.

    A solar still with a wet cloth on the side walls provides high porosity with thin film evaporation thus improving distillation. A solar still with wicks is a type of solar desalination system that utilizes wicking materials to enhance the evaporation and condensation processes.

  • iv.

    Solar stills with wicks are particularly useful in situations where there is limited access to freshwater sources or in areas with high salinity levels.

The selection of appropriate wicking materials is important to optimize the performance of the solar still. Materials with good capillary action and high evaporation rates are typically chosen. Factors such as porosity, surface area, and durability should be considered when selecting the wicking materials for a specific application. It's worth noting that the design and configuration of the solar still with wicks should be carefully considered to achieve optimal performance. Factors such as wick spacing, thickness, and arrangement can affect water distribution, evaporation rates, and condensation efficiency. Additionally, environmental conditions such as solar radiation, temperature, and humidity levels also impact the overall effectiveness of the system.

The first author sincerely acknowledges Dr Ashok Kumar Singh, Associate Professor, Galgotias College of Engineering and Technology, Greater Noida for his appreciable help while completing this article and is also grateful to Centre for Energy and Environment, Delhi Technological University, Delhi (India) for providing basic facility in compiling this manuscript.

Data cannot be made publicly available; readers should contact the corresponding author for details.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Alsehli
M.
,
Choi
J. K.
&
Aljuhan
M.
2017
A novel design for a solar powered multistage flash desalination
.
Solar Energy
153
,
348
359
.
Amimul
A.
,
Monzur
I.
,
Ataur
R.
,
Yusuf
B.
&
Fukuhara
T.
2012
Design, fabrication and performance analysis of an improved solar still
.
Desalination
292
,
105
112
.
Arunkumar
T.
,
Jayaprakash
R.
,
Denkenberger
D.
,
Ahsan
A.
,
Okundamiya
M. S.
,
Kumar
S.
,
Tanaka
H.
&
Aybar
H. S.
2012
An experimental study on a hemispherical solar still
.
Desalination
286
,
342
348
.
Arunkumar
T.
,
Jayaprakash
R.
,
Ahsan
A.
,
Denkenberger
D.
&
Okundamiya
M. S.
2013
Effect of water and air flow on concentric and tubular flow water desalting system
.
Applied Energy
103
,
109
115
.
Arunkumar
T.
,
Velraj
R.
,
Denkenberger
D. C.
,
Sathyamurthy
R.
,
Vinoth Kumar
K.
&
Ahsan
A.
2016
Productivity enhancements of compound parabolic concentrator tubular solar stills
.
Renewable Energy
88
,
391
400
.
Arunkumar
T.
,
Raj
K.
,
Dsilva Winfred Rufuss
D.
,
Denkenberger
D.
,
Tingting
G.
&
Xuan
L.
2019
A review of efficient high productivity solar stills
.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
101
,
197
220
.
Ashmad
I.
&
Hameed
S. M. K.
1997
Solar sterilization of water
.
Renewable Energy
12
,
321
.
Bapeshwararao
V. S. V.
,
Singh
U.
&
Tiwari
G. N.
1983
Transient analysis of double basin solar still
.
Energy Conversion and Management
23
(
2
),
83
90
.
Belhadj
M. M.
,
Bouguettaia
H.
,
Marif
Y.
&
Zerrouki
M.
2015
Numerical study of a double-slope solar still coupled with capillary film condenser in South Algeria
.
Energy Conversion and Management
94
,
245
252
.
Bouchekima
B.
,
Gros
B.
,
Ouahes
R.
&
Diboun
M.
1998
Performance study of the capillary film solar distiller
.
Desalination
116
,
185
192
.
Chauhan
V. K.
,
Shukla
S. K.
,
Tirkey
J. V.
&
Rathore
P. K. S.
2020
A comprehensive review of direct solar desalination techniques and its advancements
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
284
,
124719
.
Chong
T.-L.
,
Huang
B.-J.
,
Wu
P.-H.
&
Kao
Y.-C.
2014
Multiple effect diffusion solar still coupled with a vacuum-tube collector and heat pipe
.
Desalination
347
,
66
76
.
Cooper
T. A.
,
Zandavi
S. H.
,
Ni
G. W.
,
Tsurimaki
Y.
,
Huang
Y.
,
Boriskina
S. V.
&
Chen
G.
2018
Contactless steam generation and superheating under one sun illumination
.
Nature Communications
9
,
5086
.
Dimri
V.
,
Sarkar
B.
,
Singh
U.
&
Tiwari
G. N.
2008
Effect of condensing cover material on yield of an active solar still: An experimental validation
.
Desalination
227
(
1–3
),
178
189
.
El-Sebaii
A. A.
2000a
Effect of wind speed on some designs of solar stills
.
Energy Conversion and Management
41
,
523
538
.
El-Sebaii
A. A.
2000b
Effect of wind speed on active and passive solar stills
.
Energy Conversion and Management
45
,
1187
1204
.
Esfahani
I. J.
,
Rashidi
J.
,
Ifaei
P.
&
Yoo
C. K.
2016
Efficient thermal desalination technologies with renewable energy systems: A state-of-the-art review
.
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Springer New York LLC
33
,
351
387
.
Fukui
K.
,
Nosoko
T.
,
Tanaka
H.
&
Nagata
T.
2004
A new maritime life saving multistage effect solar still design
.
Desalination
160
,
271
283
.
Huang
B.-J.
,
Chong
T.-L.
,
Wu
P.-H.
,
Dai
H.-Y.
&
Kao
Y.-C.
2015
Spiral multiple-effect diffusion solar still coupled with vacuum-tube collector and heat pipe
.
Desalination
362
,
74
83
.
Jing
H.
,
Ju-Cai
Y.
,
Ze-Hui
C.
,
Hong-Fei
Z.
&
Yue-Hong
S.
The mass transfer coefficient assessment and productivity enhancement of a vertical tubular solar brackish water still
.
Applied Thermal Engineering
128
,
1446
1455
.
Kabeel
A. E.
,
Sathyamurthy
R.
,
Sharshir
S. W.
,
Muthumanokar
A.
,
Panchal
H.
,
Prakash
N.
&
El Kady
M. S.
2019a
Effect of water depth on a novel absorber plate of pyramid solar still coated with TiO2 nano black paint
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
213
,
185
191
.
Kabeel
A. E.
,
Muthu Manokar
A.
,
Sathyamurthy
R.
,
Prince Winston
D.
,
El-Agouz
S. A.
&
Chamkha
A. J.
2019b
A review on different design modifications employed in inclined solar still for enhancing the productivity
.
Journal of Solar Energy Engineering
141
(
3
),
031007
.
Kashyap
V.
,
Medhi
R.
,
Irajizad
P.
,
Jafari
P.
,
Nazari
M.
,
Ali
M.
,
Marquez
M. D.
,
Lee
T. R.
&
Ghasemi
H.
2019
Capture and conversion of carbon dioxide by solar heat localization
,
Sustainable Energy & Fuels
3
,
272
279
.
Kaviti
A. K.
,
Yadav
A.
&
Shukla
A.
2016
Inclined solar still designs: A review
.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
54
,
429
451
.
Kumar
A.
&
Prakash
O.
2019
Solar Desalination Technology
.
Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd
,
Delhi
.
Largest Water Desalination Plant, Guinness World Records. [Cited June 6, 2023]. https://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/world-records/425709-largestwater-desalination-plant.
Mahdi
J. T.
,
Smith
B. E.
&
Sharif
A. O.
2011
An experimental wick-type solar still system: Design and construction
.
Desalination
267
,
233
238
.
Mekonnen
M. M.
&
Hoekstra
A. Y.
2016
Sustainability: Four billion people facing severe water scarcity
.
Science Advances
2
(
2
),
e1500323
.
Murugavel
K. K.
,
Sivakumar
S.
,
Riaz Ahmed
J.
,
Chockalingam
K. K. S. K.
&
Srithar
K.
2010
Single basin double slope solar still with minimum basin depth and energy storing materials
.
Applied Energy
87
,
514
523
.
Natarajan
S. K.
,
Suraparaju
S. K.
,
Elavarasan
R. M.
,
Pugazhendhi
R.
&
Hossain
E.
2022
An experimental study on eco-friendly and cost-effective natural materials for productivity enhancement of single slope solar still
.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
29
(
2
),
1917
1936
.
Ni
G.
,
Zandavi
S. H.
,
Javid
S. M.
,
Boriskina
S. V.
,
Cooper
T. A.
&
Chen
G.
2018
A salt-rejecting floating solar still for low-cost desalination
.
Energy & Environmental Science
11
,
1510
1519
.
Ouahes
R.
,
Ouahes
C.
&
Le Goff
P.
1987
A. hardy, high-yield solar distiller of brackish water
.
Desalination
67
,
43
52
.
Pal
P.
&
Dev
R.
2016
Experimental study on modified double slope solar still and modified basin type double slope multi-wick solar still
.
International Journal of Civil and Environmental Engineering
10
,
70
75
.
Pal
P.
,
Yadav
P.
&
Dev
R.
2015
Design of modified basin type double slope multi-wick solar still, BLB-Int
.
Journal of Science and Technology
422
,
304
309
.
Panchal
H.
,
Sathyamurthy
R.
,
Kabeel
A. E.
,
El-Agouz
S. A.
,
Rufus
D. S.
&
Arunkumar
T.
2019
Annual performance analysis of adding different nanofluids in stepped solar still
.
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
138
(
5
),
3175
3182
.
Prakash
O.
,
Bhushan
B.
,
Kumar
A.
&
Ahmed
A.
2021
Thermal analysis of domestic type single slope–basin solar still under two different water depths
.
Materials Today: Proceedings
46
,
5482
5489
.
Qiblawey
H. M.
&
Banat
F.
2008
Solar thermal desalination technologies
.
Desalination
220
,
633
644
.
Rajaseenivasan
T.
,
KalidasaMurugavel
K.
,
Elango
T.
&
Samuel Hansen
R.
2013
A review of different methods to enhance the productivity of the multi-effect solar still
.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
17
,
248
259
.
Sadineni
S. B.
,
Hurt
R.
,
Halford
C. K.
&
Boehm
R. F.
2008
Theory and experimental investigation of a weir-type inclined solar still
.
Energy
33
,
71
80
.
Saravanavel
S.
,
Vijayakumar
K.
,
SathishKumar
G.
,
Meignanamoorthy
M.
&
Ravichandran
M.
2020
Performance on single basin square pyramid solar still
.
Materials Today Proceedings
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.943
Sathyamurthy
R.
,
Kennady
H. J.
,
Nagarajan
P. K.
&
Ahsan
A.
2014
Factors affecting the performance of triangular pyramid solar still
.
Desalination
344
,
383
390
.
Sathyamurthy
R.
,
Kabeel
A. E.
,
Balasubramanian
M.
,
Devarajan
M.
,
Sharshir
S. W.
&
Manokar
A. M.
2020
Experimental study on enhancing the yield from stepped solar still coated using fumed silica nanoparticle in black paint
.
Materials Letters
272
,
127873
.
Sharaf
M. A.
,
Nafey
A. S.
&
García-Rodríguez
L.
2011
Exergy and thermo-economic analyses of a combined solar organic cycle with multi effect distillation (MED) desalination process
.
Desalination
272
(
1–3
),
135
147
.
Shoeibi
S.
,
Saemian
M.
,
Kargarsharifabad
H.
,
Hosseinzade
S.
,
Rahbar
N.
,
Khiadani
M.
&
Rashidi
M. M.
2022
A review on evaporation improvement of solar still desalination using porous material
.
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
138
,
106387
.
Singh
A. K.
2023
Mathematical analysis of optimized requisites for novel combination of solar distillers
.
Journal of Engineering Research
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2023.100121
Singh
A. K.
&
Tiwari
G. N.
1992
Performance study of double effect distillation in a multiwick solar still
.
Energy Conversion and Management
33
(
3
),
207
214
.
Singh
A. K.
,
Yadav
R. K.
,
Mishra
D.
,
Prasad
R.
,
Gupta
L. K.
&
Kumar
P.
2020
Active solar distillation technology: A wide overview
.
Desalination
493
,
114652
.
Suraparaju
S. K.
&
Natarajan
S. K.
2020
Performance analysis of single slope solar desalination setup with natural fiber
.
Desalination and Water Treatment
193
(
February
),
64
71
.
Suraparaju
S. K.
&
Natarajan
S. K.
2021b
Augmentation of freshwater productivity in single slope solar still using Luffaacutangula fibres
.
Water Science and Technology
84
(
10–11
),
2943
2957
.
Suraparaju
S. K.
&
Natarajan
S. K.
2022a
Sustainability assessment of single slope solar still with glass cover cooling using naturally available fibers
.
Environmental Progress & Sustainable Energy
41
(
4
),
e13840
.
Suraparaju
S. K.
&
Natarajan
S. K.
2022b
Combined enhancement of evaporation and condensation rates in the solar still for augmenting the freshwater productivity using energy storage and natural fibres. AQUA – water infrastructure
.
Ecosystems and Society
71
(
5
),
628
641
.
Suraparaju
S. K.
,
Dhanusuraman
R.
&
Natarajan
S. K.
2021b
Performance evaluation of single slope solar still with novel pond fibres
.
Process Safety and Environmental Protection
154
,
142
154
.
Suresh
C.
&
Shanmugan
S.
2019
Effect of water flow in solar still using novel materials
.
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry
2019
,
1
14
.
Tiwari
G. N.
&
Sahota
L.
2017
Advanced solar-distillation systems basic principles. thermal modeling and its application
.
Green Energy and Technology
2017
,
121
155
.
Tiwari
G. N.
&
Selim
G. A. M.
1984
Double slope fiber reinforced plastic (FRP) multiwick solar still
.
Solar & Wind Technology
1
(
4
),
229
235
.
Toyama
S.
,
Aragaki
T.
,
Murase
K.
&
Tsumura
K.
1983
Simulation of the multieffect solar distillator
.
Desalination
45
,
101
108
.
Toyama
S.
,
Aragaki
T.
,
Salah
H. M.
&
Murase
K.
1987
Dynamic characteristics of a multistage thermal diffusion type solar distillator
.
Desalination
67
,
21
32
.
Velmurugan
V.
&
Srithar
K.
2011
Performance analysis of solar stills based on various factors affecting the productivity – a review
.
Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews
15
,
1294
1304
.
Velmurugan
V.
,
Gopalakrishnan
M.
,
Raghu
R.
&
Srithar
K.
2008
Single basin solar still with fin for enhancing productivity
.
Energy Conversion and Management
49
(
10
),
2602
2608
.
Zoori
H. A.
,
Tabrizi
F. F.
,
Sarhaddi
F.
&
Heshmatnezhad
F.
2013
Comparison between energy and exergy efficiencies in a weir type cascade solar still
.
Desalination
325
,
113
121
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).