Measuring the extent of supraglacial debris cover (SDC) in the Karakoram region has proven to be a difficult task. Semi-automatic methodologies are often used for mapping the SDC area. However, these have limitations which lead to the overestimation or underestimation of glaciated areas. Considering these facts, this study aimed to assess the glacier's extent using a combination of satellite data and ground verification of SDC in the Hunza River Basin, Pakistan. The normalized difference snow index (NDSI) of various satellite images coupled with extensive ground survey was applied to estimate the glacier extent. Results of the glacier extents were in the range of 18–32 km2 for Gulkin, 6–18 km2 for Gulmit, and 6–17 km2 for Pissan glaciers. The ground survey indicated that satellite products are underestimating the extent of glaciers by an average of 18.018%. The comparison of on-site SDC data with Global Land Ice Measurements from Space (GLIMS) and Randolph Glacier Inventory (RGI) databases also indicates a slight variation. Overall results validate that combining satellite imagery with ground verification significantly enhances the accuracy of supraglacial extent assessment.

  • Supraglacial debris cover (SDC) area was investigated physically.

  • The glacier areas estimated by different satellites combined with SDC are compared with GLIMS/RGI inventories.

  • The highest undetected SDC area was identified by MODIS satellite images.

B

band

CPs

change points

Glaciers are a significant source of fresh water, a sensitive indicator of climate change, and are retreating and thinning because of global warming (Kraaijenbrink et al. 2017; Tielidze et al. 2020). Recent studies on glacio-hydrological modeling, glacial area change, and mass balance response to climate change (Wu et al. 2018; Wang et al. 2019; Wouters et al. 2019) highlight impacts on the socioeconomic development of downstream riparian (Immerzeel et al. 2010). However, debris accumulation on mountainous slopes and glaciers as a result of climate-induced rock disintegration has been found at Karakoram Highway (KKH) (Khan et al. 2015; Cook et al. 2020) that affects the heat exchange at the surface affecting the mass balance of glaciers in terms of melt rate and mass loss. Moreover, the thickness of the debris covers slows down the melting, thus delaying its response to climate change. Therefore, the aerial assessment of supraglacial debris cover (SDC) is important for studies related to hydrologic modeling and glacier dynamics.

Assessment of debris cover has a unique thermal characteristic because of physical attributes including color, reflectance, and particle size which result in the melting process beneath the ice (Nicholson & Benn 2006). The similar reflectance of supraglacial debris with non-glaciated slopes and the discontinuous repository of remote sensing images without clouds and shadows make it challenging to track long-term variation in SDC (Paul et al. 2004). Previous research adopted various methods to distinguish the ice from debris cover by indices such as the normalized difference water index (NDWI), the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI), the normalized difference snow index (NDSI), the spectral band ratio thresholds (NIR/SWIR), or a combination of these (Alifu et al. 2016; Mölg et al. 2018). Since these methods cannot accurately classify the debris cover (Robson et al. 2015) and urge to use of other parameters related to digital elevation models (DEMs) (Frey & Paul 2012; Patel et al. 2019), thermal characteristics from the infrared band to improve the accuracy of debris cover classification (LIPPL et al. 2018; Singh & Goyal 2018). Moreover, automatic algorithms based on machine learning approaches including support vector machine (SVM), random forest (RF), and classification and regression tree (CART) with remote sensing images and multiple DEM data are used by various researchers to map glacier facies (Racoviteanu & Williams 2012; Shukla & Yousuf 2017; Zhang et al. 2019; Yousuf et al. 2020) and debris-covered glaciers (Zhang et al. 2019; Xie et al. 2020). However, powerful computational systems are required to extract the large scale and time series of land information from high spatiotemporal resolution images and debris cover glacier mapping based on near-infrared (NIR) or visible (VIS) bands is challenging because of low detection efficiency (Bhambri et al. 2011; Frey et al. 2012). Therefore, field based survey coupled with remote sensing techniques is significant for detecting the debris-covered glacier (Vincent et al. 2013).

Satellite images are an important source for measuring the area of glaciers extent. However, field measurements are strongly recommended, e.g. the extraction of debris thicknesses to see their response to hydrology and water resources (Xie et al. 2020) and the selection of training samples for the validation of debris-covered glaciers (Zhang et al. 2019). The extracted glaciated extent area using the remote sensing techniques is different for different satellite products and often leads to erroneous results when used in climate models for prediction of climate change impact on glaciers and stream flow estimation which emphasizes the need for bias correction in the satellite products (Kääb et al. 2014). Moreover, the classification of snow on glaciers is difficult with band ratios, as the shape of the spectral curves of ice and snow is very similar and thus results in the same values for both facies. A robust and widely used approach for mapping SC on glaciers is based on the use of a threshold on either single-band reflectance values, preferably in the NIR to avoid saturated values over snow with Landsat data (Veettil & Kamp 2017), or albedo products that are readily available (Brun et al. 2015; Stephens et al. 2015). In previous studies, different researchers have conducted outlines of glacier data using different satellites, and agreeing on accuracy is a great challenge (Albert 2002; Friedl et al. 2020). However, the measured quantities of glaciers are not commonly verified by ground truthing (Eisen et al. 2008; Friedl et al. 2020), which results in insignificant and low-precision data which leads to overestimation or underestimation of the flows of glaciated rivers (Shea & Immerzeel 2016). Hence, there is a need to estimate glacier extent using remote sensing and GIS followed by ground verification of SDCs (Vincent et al. 2013).

The overall aim of this study is to assess the selected glacier coverage through the well-proven application of NDSI using multiple satellite images (Landsat-8, Sentinel-2, and MODIS) and to outline the SDCs through field survey. The effectiveness of NDSI, derived from the visible and NIR spectral bands, has been widely documented for its ability to isolate snow and ice from other land cover types (Shukla et al. 2010). This study further compares the drawn SDC boundary with the GLIMS/RGI glacier outline inventory for its future applications regarding mass balance and hydrological modeling studies.

The material used in this research comprises satellite images of Landsat-8, Sentinel-2, and MODIS. The equipment used for the ground survey is Total Station Topcon GPT 7501, DGPS RTK (10 mm horizontal and 20 mm vertical), and the software used for processing is SetSurv. The flowchart of the adopted methodology is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Methodology flowchart.

Figure 1

Methodology flowchart.

Close modal

Study area

This study was carried out for three glaciers, namely Gulkin, Gulmit, and Pissan located in the Hunza River Basin (HRB), which lie within the Karakoram Range. Geographically, the study area is located between 36°32′–37°05′ N and 74°02′–75°48′ E (Figure 2) and the features of selected glaciers are presented in Table 1. Based on the Shuttle Radar Topography Mission (SRTM) digital elevation model (DEM), the elevation of the study area is 1,418–7,814 msl. The climatology (arid to semi-arid) of the study area is mainly influenced by Asian monsoon and westerlies which contribute up to 80% of the annual precipitation that ranges between 180 and 690 mm (Qureshi et al. 2017). The average temperature ranges between −5 and 6.6 °C recorded in the months of January and July (Nazeer et al. 2022).
Table 1

Characteristics of Gulkin, Gulmit, and Pissan glaciers extracted from the RGI 6.0

Sr. No.DescriptionGlaciers name
GulkinGulmitPissan
Glacier area (km230.544 14.621 14.411 
Elevation range (masl) 2,556–7,295 2,964–6,655 2,425–7,426 
Glacier length (km) 17.099 10.608 11.044 
Glacier avg slope (%) 29.100 31.700 35.200 
Sr. No.DescriptionGlaciers name
GulkinGulmitPissan
Glacier area (km230.544 14.621 14.411 
Elevation range (masl) 2,556–7,295 2,964–6,655 2,425–7,426 
Glacier length (km) 17.099 10.608 11.044 
Glacier avg slope (%) 29.100 31.700 35.200 
Figure 2

Hunza River Basin with Gulkin, Gulmit, and Pissan glaciers (a) are located in the northern part of Pakistan (b) glimpses during ground survey of supraglacial boundary at Gulmit site (c).

Figure 2

Hunza River Basin with Gulkin, Gulmit, and Pissan glaciers (a) are located in the northern part of Pakistan (b) glimpses during ground survey of supraglacial boundary at Gulmit site (c).

Close modal

The Hunza is one of the main sub-basins of the Upper Indus Basin (UIB), and it contributes about 12% of the total flow of the UIB upstream of the Tarbela reservoir (Shrestha et al. 2015). The area of the Hunza catchment is about 13,733 km2 and is covered by 25% glaciers. The basin hosts some extensive glacier systems, including Pissan (14.411 km2), Gulmit (14.621 km2), Gulkin (30.544 km2), Pasu (62.194 km2), Khurdopin (111 km2), Virjerab (112 km2), Batura (238 km2), Hispar (339 km2), and a few others (Arendt et al. 2017; Nazeer et al. 2022). The majority of the glaciers are valley and debris covered (Bhambri et al. 2017) and along the KKH. Glaciers in the area feed the Hunza River, as the main source of water for the area. The selected glaciers and others have retreated, as documented after evaluating the temporal glacier inventories by Anwar & Iqbal (2018), Shafique et al. (2018), and Zhang et al. (2019). Moreover, the climatic data specifically temperature is rapidly increasing resulting in the melting of glaciers that can cause the shrinkage of fresh water and glacier lake outburst floods (GLOFs) that impose a threat to downstream living communities and major infrastructure such as the KKH. Since these glaciers serve as essential water supplies for towns downstream, underscoring the urgent need for accurate hydrological modeling and monitoring that combines state-of-the-art satellite imaging with on-the-ground confirmation to efficiently manage water resources in the face of climate change.

Downloading of satellite imagery

The satellite images of Landsat-8, Sentinel-2, and MODIS were downloaded for the HRB for the month of September 2022, with cloud coverage of less than 15% from https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/, https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov, and https://nsidc.org/data/MODIS. MODIS images were originally downloaded in hdf format and converted into Geotiff with a projection of UTM using HegTool Ver 2.15 Build 9.8. Table 2 provides information on salient features of used satellite images including the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) zone, date, resolution, and cloud cover. The two tiles for the MODIS image located in 42N and 43N UTM zones were used to cover the study area where zone refers to a particular geographic region on the earth's surface. Furthermore, these images were downloaded after the field visit of three glaciers so that a more precise glacier extent could be extracted.

Table 2

Salient features of satellites and their images

SatelliteImage tileUTM zoneDDMMYYResolution (m)Cloud cover (%)
Landsat-8 LC08_L2SP_150034_20220907_20220914_02 43N 7 September 2022 30 <15 
Sentinel-2 L1C_T43SDA_A037654_20220907T055601 43N 7 September 2022 10 <15 
MODIS MOD10A1.A2022250.h24v05.006.2022258073912
MOD10A1.A2022280.h24v05.006.2022282032018 
43N
42N 
7 September 2022
10 October 2022 
500 <15 
SatelliteImage tileUTM zoneDDMMYYResolution (m)Cloud cover (%)
Landsat-8 LC08_L2SP_150034_20220907_20220914_02 43N 7 September 2022 30 <15 
Sentinel-2 L1C_T43SDA_A037654_20220907T055601 43N 7 September 2022 10 <15 
MODIS MOD10A1.A2022250.h24v05.006.2022258073912
MOD10A1.A2022280.h24v05.006.2022282032018 
43N
42N 
7 September 2022
10 October 2022 
500 <15 

Variation in glacier coverage

The debris on the glacier can cause uncertainties while automatic mapping of glaciers by satellite imagery demotes mapping reliability and requires post-corrections manually (Paul et al. 2004; Racoviteanu et al. 2008; Bhambri & Bolch 2009). Therefore, a semi-automatic approach consisting of post-manual digitization was applied to identify the glacier's boundaries to achieve accuracy with <2% control error. Furthermore, satellite images were preprocessed using a GIS environment for image enhancement and mosaicking where required. Additionally, Google Earth was used for the manual identification of glaciers. The NDSI was used to delineate the glacier's outlines following Equation (1):
(1)
The NDSI quantifies the magnitude of the reflectance difference between the Visible (green) and SWIR bands. Since the band numbers of visible (green) and short-wave infrared are satellite-specific, accordingly the NDSI for the Landsat-8, Sentinel-2, and MODIS images was found using Equations (2)–(4):
(2)
(3)
(4)
For MODIS, snow cover can be detected using the NDSI ratio of the difference in visible and SWIR reflectance. A pixel with NDSI > 0.0 indicates the presence of some snow and a pixel with NDSI ≤ 0.0 indicates a snow-free land surface (Riggs & Hall 2015). Moreover, for the glaciers, the NDSI threshold of 0.200–0.100 can be tested. For instance, the NDSI value of 0.200 was used to separate the glacier from debris by Pratibha & Kulkarni (2018) and Gjermundsen et al. (2011) tested NDSI values of 0.300–0.700 to separate the glacier. In this study, to accurately determine the threshold for glaciers, the SDC area was surveyed for each glacier and an NDSI value of 0.400 was adopted after overlying the SDC area to reclassify the NDSI map. Therefore, a plot of green reflectance as a function of NDSI in the case of Pissan glacier presents that a threshold of 0.400 can be utilized to outline the glacier boundaries (Figure 3).
Figure 3

Plot of green reflectance as a function of NDSI for Pissan glacier.

Figure 3

Plot of green reflectance as a function of NDSI for Pissan glacier.

Close modal

Accounting for seasonal snow cover

The precise mapping of SDC glaciers is impeded by the presence of seasonal snow cover. As a result, the glacier mapping was conducted only in areas devoid of seasonal snow cover. Based on the available data and visual evidence, it is apparent that the process of snow or glacier melting persists in the Karakoram Mountain range until the end of August, followed by a subsequent decline in temperature throughout the month of September and snow accumulation again starting in October (Rittger et al. 2013; Atif et al. 2015). The identification of the lowest snow-free area, which refers to the region that remains covered by glaciers throughout the year, in the Karakoram mountains occurs around September. Subsequently, an analysis was conducted on the alterations seen in each of the three glaciers. The area was surveyed via a supervised classification technique that employed visible near-infrared (VNIR) and SWIR bands to delineate and analyze the various characteristics of the glacier features. A threshold range of <0.400 was established in order to delineate regions without snow (Atif et al. 2015).

Mapping the SDC area

Due to the remoteness, vastness, and inaccessible nature of the mountain glaciers, satellite data are likely an effective tool for regular mapping of glaciers in a comprehensive and effective manner (Shukla et al. 2009; Bhambri et al. 2011). Over the years, a number of remote sensing techniques for automated mapping of glacier snow and ice by means of multispectral classification have been available. Commonly used techniques such as single-band ratios (Paul et al. 2011) and NDSI (Nagai et al. 2013) take advantage of the high brightness of snow and ice in visible wavelengths to separate them from darker areas such as rock, soil, or vegetation. However, the greatest difficulty in glacier mapping from remotely sensed data is the presence of debris-covered areas on glaciers (Bolch et al. 2008). Glacier areas covered by debris confound the existing techniques because of similar VIS and NIR spectral signatures to the surrounding terrain, lateral, and terminal moraines – outside of a glacier margin (Florath et al. 2022) even with additional information of topography, thermal data, surface texture, and geomorphometric features (Paul et al. 2004; Shukla et al. 2010; Bhambri et al. 2011; Pellicciotti et al. 2015) for neighborhood analysis (Florath et al. 2022).

However, these automatic methods have constraints to extracting the glaciers from SD areas precisely, depending on various factors including steepness of the terrain slope, spectral reflectance, cloudiness, type of snow or ice, and required field measurement. For example, Gjermundsen et al. (2011) highlighted that all the lakes in their study area were classified as glaciers through the application of NDSI due to the similar reflectance of turbid lakes and glacier ice. Also, automated mapping is not generalized and generates reproducible results (similar outlines are going to be generated with the same threshold values) (Paul et al. 2013). Moreover, the SDC area remains underestimated by 8–23% using the band ratio and NDSI methods, respectively (Pratibha & Kulkarni 2018).

Keeping in view the above limitation, the mapping for SDC was completed by the field survey for each selected glacier. The details of the field survey are placed in a subsequent section. The field survey consisted of marking the glacier snout points for each studied glacier. A total of 240 snout points covering latitude, longitude, and altitude were noted for demarcating the SDC areas. The details of the surveyed snout points for each studied glacier are provided in Supplementary Tables S1–S3.

Field survey

A preliminary site assessment evaluated field conditions and topography, finalizing the study's implementation plan. Data were processed using advanced Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) software, but comprehensive field mapping of the glacier is not feasible due to challenging terrain and climatic conditions.

The field survey was conducted from 19 August to 25 August 2022, to measure the SDCs of three glacier sites as depicted in Figure 1. The mapping of the glacier terminus/snout was conducted in the field using a combination of long-range prismless total station and handheld GPS devices and collected a sequence of data points along the outside edge of the terminus.

In this study, the selection of the position for the Real-Time Kinematic Differential Global Positioning System (RTK DGPS) was determined by stability, safety, and the sky view. A control network with benchmarks and control points was implemented for optimal precision and minimal spatial discrepancies. The benchmark in close proximity to the project area was initially built in the WGS1984 coordinate system, which serves as the default system. GPS control points were established, observations were taken, and it was assured that at least four satellites with a Geometric Dilution of Precision (GDOP) value of 5 were available for all-time observations. The control points already established by GNSS were used to carry out the survey along the boundary of SDC. One of the established control points was utilized as a reference for setting the total station, while the other established control point was utilized for obtaining readings during the back station process. Points known as change points (CPs) were strategically placed at regular intervals to mitigate the impact of the curvature factor on the true ground heights. Spot heights were measured generally at close intervals, particularly at abrupt changes in the ground.

The GNSS instrument, Satlab SL800 provided by SATLAB Geosolutions (for converting the coordinate and projection system), and computer software SetSurv (to transfer control networks to layout through GIS/AutoCAD) were used. The accuracy of Satlab SL800 in RTK mode is established as horizontal/vertical ±10 mm/ ± 20 mm +1 ppm. The recorded field survey data through Total Stations and GNSS was transferred and digitized in a CAD environment to check the quality and gaps. Further, the observed data was also exported in CSV format and KML file for further processing in the GIS environment and presented in Supplementary Tables S1–S3.

The study involved the assessment of three glaciers named Gulkin, Gulmit, and Pissan, including their debris-covered areas. Figure 4 provides a depiction of the Gulkin watershed, including the various elevation zones and the surveyed area of SDC. Additionally, the figure illustrates the size of the glacier as determined using measurements obtained from Sentinel-2, MODIS, and Landsat-8. The glacier size of Gulkin is estimated as 17.941, 31.679, and 21.114 km2 by these satellite images, respectively. Moreover, the SDC area of 4.000 km2 is mapped through a field survey as shown in Figure 4(c).
Figure 4

Gulkin watershed characteristics (a) watershed boundary, (b) elevation, (c) field survey area, and glacier extent by (d) Sentinel-2, (e) MODIS, and (f) Landsat-8.

Figure 4

Gulkin watershed characteristics (a) watershed boundary, (b) elevation, (c) field survey area, and glacier extent by (d) Sentinel-2, (e) MODIS, and (f) Landsat-8.

Close modal
Figure 5 shows a depiction of the Gulmit watershed, including the various elevation zones and the surveyed area of SDC. Additionally, the figure illustrates the size of the glacier as determined using measurements obtained from Sentinel-2, MODIS, and Landsat-8. The glacier size of Gulmit was found to be 6.059, 18.464, and 8.974 km2, respectively. Moreover, the SDC area of 1.530 km2 is drawn through a field survey as illustrated in Figure 5(c).
Figure 5

Gulmit watershed characteristics (a) watershed boundary, (b) elevation, (c) field survey area, and glacier extent by (d) Sentinel-2, (e) MODIS, and (f) Landsat-8.

Figure 5

Gulmit watershed characteristics (a) watershed boundary, (b) elevation, (c) field survey area, and glacier extent by (d) Sentinel-2, (e) MODIS, and (f) Landsat-8.

Close modal
Figure 6 shows a picture of the Pissan glacier watershed, elevation zones, and SDC boundary. The analysis of glacier coverage highlights the area of 6.339 km2 by Sentinel-2; 16.721 km2 by MODIS, and 9.700 km2 by Landsat-8. Moreover, the SDC area of 3.200 km2 through field survey is outlined in Figure 6(c).
Figure 6

Pissan watershed characteristics (a) watershed boundary, (b) elevation, (c) field survey area, and glacier extent by (d) Sentinel-2, (e) MODIS, and (f) Landsat-8.

Figure 6

Pissan watershed characteristics (a) watershed boundary, (b) elevation, (c) field survey area, and glacier extent by (d) Sentinel-2, (e) MODIS, and (f) Landsat-8.

Close modal

Differences in sensor resolution, spectral band sensitivity, picture acquisition timing, and image processing methods affect the variability in glacier area estimations from the Landsat-8, Sentinel-2, and MODIS satellites. Since Landsat-8 has a better resolution (30 m) than MODIS (500 m), it can catch finer features, which may result in more accurate boundary delineations (Concha & Schott 2014; Azzoni et al. 2018). Sentinel-2 is in the middle of the two with its 10-m resolution (Azzoni et al. 2018). The sensitivity of each satellite to snow and ice is influenced by variations in spectral bands, especially when there are changes in debris cover and meltwater. Additionally, because glacier boundaries may be obscured by seasonal snow cover, the timing of image acquisition might have a considerable impact on the results. Discrepancies can also be caused by the processing methods, which may differ in how they address elements such as cloud cover and image calibration.

Debris-covered glaciers do, in fact, have distinct spectral properties that require specialized methods for precise identification and extraction. Azzoni et al. (2018) concluded that medium-resolution Landsat ETM+ are ineffective for evaluating the SDC in the Alpine context and Sentinel-2 proved only for preliminary mapping of debris features. Therefore, the studies emphasized the field survey to estimate the precise SDC area (Zhang et al. 2019; Xie et al. 2020).

Figure 7(a) and 7(b) summarizes the glacier area and percentage of their undetected SDCs with respect to the glacier area determined by each satellite image. The results revealed that the glacier area combined with the physically surveyed SDC area remained underestimated by Sentinel-2 and Landsat-8 and overestimated by MODIS for each glacier once compared with the RGI-6 glacier outline data (Table 1). The results of the glacier area combined with the SDC area by Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 showed a close relationship with each other. However, the glacier area estimated by MODIS is quite different from the other two satellite images. Based on the glacier estimates by remote sensing techniques combined with SDC from field surveys, the results revealed that Landsat-8 yields marginally superior outcomes followed by Sentinel-2 and MODIS which exhibit a somewhat larger degree of variability.
Figure 7

Glacier area estimates of satellite images (Sentinel-2, Landsat-8, and MODIS) with surveyed SDC area (a) and percentage of undetected SDC (b).

Figure 7

Glacier area estimates of satellite images (Sentinel-2, Landsat-8, and MODIS) with surveyed SDC area (a) and percentage of undetected SDC (b).

Close modal

Based on the results, it is apparent that none of the three satellites were able to detect the SDC. Consequently, a substantial variation was detected in the assessment of glacier extent. This discrepancy has the potential to introduce large errors in the prediction of present and future calibrations of flows. The HRB region is characterized by the presence of pristine glaciers at higher altitudes, exhibiting high reflectivity in their upper sections. In the intermediate sections, these glaciers are partially covered by thin layers of debris, while the lower parts, particularly in the snout area, are heavily covered by debris.

The study also reveals that a substantial proportion of glaciers are covered by debris and on average 20.326% of the SDC area remained undetected by three satellite images. Moreover, all of the glaciers exhibit partial debris coverage, particularly the Pissan glacier having the highest undetected SDC area of 33% by Sentinel-2 (Figure 7(b)). The findings of the current study align with prior research on glacier extent and snow and debris cover (SDC) in the Hunza basin where field measurements conducted in the basin have consistently documented a decline in glacier coverage (Shrestha & Nepal 2019). It is also evident that there is a persistent decline in glacier coverage over time, accompanied by an increase in SDC (Alifu et al. 2016). The utilization of the current SDC findings in modeling can facilitate the estimation of forthcoming changes in flow patterns and mass balance depletion caused by climate change.

Comparison with other data sources

Table 3 presents the selected glacier areas by GLIMS and the RGI 6.0 dataset (RGI Consortium 2017) provided by three GLIMS institutes named Nagoya University, the University of Colorado, and the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD). Overall, the area for each glacier (Figure 7(a)) is comparable with the RGI/GLIMS glacier inventory. The areas estimated by the three institutes are based on satellite data from Landsat-4 and Landsat-7 with 30–50% manual editing. The process of estimating the area consists of semi-automated glacier classification, semi-automated mapping with optical images, manual digitization, and multi-resolution segmentation of Landsat images. The results for the glacier area estimate (Figure 7) of Gulkin, Gulmit, and Pissan by Landsat-8 images are more comparable with the ICIMOD GLIMS dataset. This may be because of the latest dataset provided by ICIMOD with the least manual digitization (30%) and object-based semi-automated glacier classification using multi-resolution segmentation of Landsat images. Figure 8 and Table 4 illustrate the graphical and quantitative comparison of SDC by field survey and GLIMS outlines, respectively. Results indicated that variation in the SDC area by GLIMS and field survey is insignificant (Table 4).
Table 3

Glacier area estimated from GLIMS and RGI

DescriptionGlacier
Area (km2)Timestamp
GLIMS institution
IDNameSourceAnalysis
GLIMS G074786E36426N Gulkin 23.400 10/08/1997 01/07/2018 Nagoya University 
30.544 16/09/1999 16/07/2015 University of Colorado 
21.201 16/09/2007 15/04/2014 ICIMOD 
G074798E36411N Gulmit 11.568 10/08/1997 01/07/2018 Nagoya University 
14.621 16/09/1999 16/07/2015 University of Colorado 
9.104 16/09/2007 15/04/2014 ICIMOD 
G074514E36206N Pissan 12.070 10/08/1997 01/07/2018 Nagoya University 
14.411 29/08/2001 16/07/2015 University of Colorado 
7.140 14/09/2007 15/04/2014 ICIMOD 
RGI (6.0) released July 28, 2017 RGI60-14.03250 Gulkin 30.544 – – – 
RGI60-14.03394 Gulmit 14.621 – – – 
RGI60-14.04178 Pissan 14.411 – – – 
DescriptionGlacier
Area (km2)Timestamp
GLIMS institution
IDNameSourceAnalysis
GLIMS G074786E36426N Gulkin 23.400 10/08/1997 01/07/2018 Nagoya University 
30.544 16/09/1999 16/07/2015 University of Colorado 
21.201 16/09/2007 15/04/2014 ICIMOD 
G074798E36411N Gulmit 11.568 10/08/1997 01/07/2018 Nagoya University 
14.621 16/09/1999 16/07/2015 University of Colorado 
9.104 16/09/2007 15/04/2014 ICIMOD 
G074514E36206N Pissan 12.070 10/08/1997 01/07/2018 Nagoya University 
14.411 29/08/2001 16/07/2015 University of Colorado 
7.140 14/09/2007 15/04/2014 ICIMOD 
RGI (6.0) released July 28, 2017 RGI60-14.03250 Gulkin 30.544 – – – 
RGI60-14.03394 Gulmit 14.621 – – – 
RGI60-14.04178 Pissan 14.411 – – – 
Table 4

Comparison of the SDC area estimated by GLIMS glacier snout boundary and filed survey

Glacier nameSDC area (km2)
GLIMSField survey
Gulkin 4.620 4.000 
Gulmit 1.530 1.530 
Pissan 3.150 3.200 
Glacier nameSDC area (km2)
GLIMSField survey
Gulkin 4.620 4.000 
Gulmit 1.530 1.530 
Pissan 3.150 3.200 
Figure 8

Supraglacial debris cover with GLIMS outlines for (a) Gulkin, (b) Pissan, and (c) Gulmit.

Figure 8

Supraglacial debris cover with GLIMS outlines for (a) Gulkin, (b) Pissan, and (c) Gulmit.

Close modal

This study utilized Landsat-8, Sentinel-2, and MODIS satellite products to estimate the NDSI of the Gulkin, Gulmit, and Pissan glaciers. Subsequently, ground verifications were conducted to assess the supraglacial portion of these three glaciers. The following conclusions are inferred from the results presented in this study:

  • The less variability in quantitative glacier extent measurements by Landsat-8 compared with others shows a good agreement with other glacier extent datasets such as GLIMS, RGI, and aerial surveys.

  • The glacier extent remained underestimated by the NDSI of Landsat-8, Sentinel-2, and MODIS because of the undetected significant SDC that ranges from 7.652 to 33.548% where MODIS produces the highest undetected SDC area.

  • The presence of an additional supraglacial area of 4, 1.530, and 3.200 km2 in the Gulkin, Gulmit, and Pissan watersheds, respectively, emphasizes the need to validate the accuracy of glacier extent prediction by the imagery data for water balance and hydrological model studies.

  • The SDCs areas of 18.433, 23.980, and 11.642% by Landsat-8, Sentinel-2, and MODIS for Gulkin, Gulmit, and Pissan glaciers may present an average of 18.018% glacier area under debris cover in HRB.

In order to predict the impact of climate change on future flows as well as the loss of mass balance, the results of the present SDC can be used in the models. This study shows that Landsat-8 and Sentinel-2 data with GLIMS and RGI inventory with few changes can be used for SDC studies at basin scale. The Landsat-8 data exhibits better results compared with Sentinel-2 and MODIS platforms.

The authors are thankful to USGS, NASA, and NSIDC for providing the Landsat-8, Sentinel-2, and MODIS satellite images for the SRTM digital elevation model. The author also wants to acknowledge GLIMS and RGI for providing glacier extent data from the websites.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Alifu
H.
,
Johnson
B. A.
&
Tateishi
R.
(
2016
)
Delineation of debris-covered glaciers based on a combination of geomorphometric parameters and a TIR/NIR/SWIR band ratio
,
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
,
9
(
2
),
781
792
.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2015.2500906
.
Anwar
Y.
&
Iqbal
J.
(
2018
)
Spatio temporal change of selected glaciers along Karakoram highway from 1994–2017 using remote sensing and GIS techniques
,
ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
,
4
(
3
),
7
11
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-3-7-2018
.
Arendt
A.
,
Bliss
A.
,
Bolch
T.
,
Cogley
J. G.
,
Gardner
A. S.
,
Hagen
J.-O.
,
Hock
R.
,
Huss
M.
,
Kaser
G.
,
Kienholz
C.
,
Pfeffer
W. T.
,
Moholdt
G.
,
Paul
F.
,
Radić
V.
,
Andreassen
L. M.
,
Bajracharya
S.
,
Barrand
N. E.
,
Beedle
M.
,
Berthier
E.
,
Bhambri
R.
,
Brown
I.
,
Burgess
E.
,
Burgess
D.
,
Cawkwell
F.
,
Chinn
T.
,
Copland
L.
,
Davies
B.
,
De Angelis
H.
,
Diolaiuti
G. A.
,
Dolgova
E.
,
Earl
L.
,
Filbert
K.
,
Forester
R.
,
Fountain
A. G.
,
Frey
H.
,
Giffen
B.
,
Glasser
N.
,
Guo
W.Q.
,
Gurney
S.
,
Hagg
W.
,
Hall
D.
,
Haritashya
U. K.
,
Hartmann
G.
,
Helm
C.
,
Herreid
S.
,
Hoffman
M. J.
,
Howat
I.
,
Kapustin
G.
,
Karimi
N.
,
Khromova
T.
,
König
M.
,
Kohler
J.
,
Kriegel
D.
,
Kutuzov
S.
,
Landmann
J.
,
Lavrentiev
I.
,
LeBris
R.
,
Liu
S. Y.
,
Lo
R.
,
Lund
J.
,
Manley
W.
,
Marti
R.
,
Maussion
F.
,
Mayer
C.
,
Miles
E. S.
,
Li
X.
,
Menounos
B.
,
Mercer
A.
,
Mölg
N.
,
Mool
P.
,
Nosenko
G.
,
Negrete
A.
,
Nuimura
T.
,
Nuth
C.
,
Pettersson
R.
,
Rabatel
A.
,
Racoviteanu
A.
,
Ranzi
R.
,
Rastner
P.
,
Rau
F.
,
Raup
B.
,
Rich
J.
,
Rott
H.
,
Sakai
A.
,
Schneider
C.
,
Seliverstov
Y.
,
Sevestre
H.
,
Sharp
M.
,
Sigurðsson
O.
,
Smiraglia
C.
,
Stokes
C.
,
Way
R. G.
,
Wheate
R.
,
Winsvold
S.
,
Wolken
G.
,
Wyatt
F.
&
Zheltyhina
N.
(
2017
)
Randolph Glacier Inventory – A Dataset of Global Glacier Outlines: Version 6.0: Technical Report
,.
Atif
I.
,
Mahboob
M. A.
&
Iqbal
J.
(
2015
)
Snow cover area change assessment in 2003 and 2013 using MODIS data of the Upper Indus Basin, Pakistan
,
Journal of Himalayan Earth Sciences
,
48
(
2
),
177
128
.
Azzoni
R. S.
,
Fugazza
D.
,
Zerboni
A.
,
Senese
A.
,
D'Agata
C.
,
Maragno
D.
,
Carzaniga
A.
,
Cernuschi
M.
&
Diolaiuti
G. A.
(
2018
)
Evaluating high-resolution remote sensing data for reconstructing the recent evolution of supra glacial debris
,
Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment
,
42
(
1
),
3
23
.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133317749434
.
Bhambri
R.
&
Bolch
T.
(
2009
)
Glacier mapping: A review with special reference to the Indian Himalayas
,
Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment
,
33
(
5
),
672
704
.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133309348112
.
Bhambri
R.
,
Bolch
T.
&
Chaujar
R. K.
(
2011
)
Mapping of debris-covered glaciers in the Garhwal Himalayas using ASTER DEMs and thermal data
,
International Journal of Remote Sensing
,
32
(
23
),
8095
8119
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2010.532821
.
Bhambri
R.
,
Hewitt
K.
,
Kawishwar
P.
&
Pratap
B.
(
2017
)
Surge-type and surge-modified glaciers in the Karakoram
,
Scientific Reports
,
7
(
1
),
15391
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-15473-8
.
Bolch
T.
,
Buchroithner
M. F.
,
Peters
J.
,
Baessler
M.
&
Bajracharya
S.
(
2008
)
Identification of glacier motion and potentially dangerous glacial lakes in the Mt. Everest region/Nepal using spaceborne imagery
,
Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences
,
8
(
6
),
1329
1340
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-8-1329-2008
.
Brun
F.
,
Dumont
M.
,
Wagnon
P.
,
Berthier
E.
,
Azam
M. F.
,
Shea
J. M.
,
Sirguey
P.
,
Rabatel
A.
&
Ramanathan
A.
(
2015
)
Seasonal changes in surface albedo of Himalayan glaciers from MODIS data and links with the annual mass balance
,
The Cryosphere
,
9
(
1
),
341
355
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-341-2015
.
Concha
J. A.
&
Schott
J. R.
(
2014
)
In-water component retrieval over Case 2 water using Landsat 8: Initial results
, In:
2014 IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium
, pp.
4458
4461
.
https://doi.org/10.1109/IGARSS.2014.6947481
Cook
S. J.
,
Swift
D. A.
,
Kirkbride
M. P.
,
Knight
P. G.
&
Waller
R. I.
(
2020
)
The empirical basis for modelling glacial erosion rates
,
Nature Communications
,
11
(
1
),
759
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14583-8
.
Eisen
O.
,
Frezzotti
M.
,
Genthon
C.
,
Isaksson
E.
,
Magand
O.
,
van den Broeke
M. R.
,
Dixon
D. A.
,
Ekaykin
A.
,
Holmlund
P.
,
Kameda
T.
,
Karlöf
L.
,
Kaspari
S.
,
Lipenkov
V. Y.
,
Oerter
H.
,
Takahashi
S.
&
Vaughan
D. G.
(
2008
)
Ground-based measurements of spatial and temporal variability of snow accumulation in East Antarctica
,
Reviews of Geophysics
,
46
(
2
).
https://doi.org/10.1029/2006RG000218
.
Florath
J.
,
Keller
S.
,
Abarca-del-Rio
R.
,
Hinz
S.
,
Staub
G.
&
Weinmann
M.
(
2022
)
Glacier monitoring based on multi-spectral and multi-temporal satellite data: A case study for classification with respect to different snow and ice types
,
Remote Sensing
,
14
(
4
),
845
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14040845
.
Frey
H.
&
Paul
F.
(
2012
)
On the suitability of the SRTM DEM and ASTER GDEM for the compilation of topographic parameters in glacier inventories
,
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
,
18
,
480
490
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2011.09.020
.
Frey
H.
,
Paul
F.
&
Strozzi
T.
(
2012
)
Compilation of a glacier inventory for the western Himalayas from satellite data: Methods, challenges, and results
,
Remote Sensing of Environment
,
124
,
832
843
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2012.06.020
.
Friedl
P.
,
Weiser
F.
,
Fluhrer
A.
&
Braun
M. H.
(
2020
)
Remote sensing of glacier and ice sheet grounding lines: A review
,
Earth-Science Reviews
,
201
,
102948
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102948
.
Gjermundsen
E. F.
,
Mathieu
R.
,
Kääb
A.
,
Chinn
T.
,
Fitzharris
B.
&
Hagen
J. O.
(
2011
)
Assessment of multispectral glacier mapping methods and derivation of glacier area changes, 1978–2002, in the central Southern Alps, New Zealand, from ASTER satellite data, field survey and existing inventory data
,
Journal of Glaciology
,
57
(
204
),
667
683
.
https://doi.org/10.3189/002214311797409749
.
Immerzeel
W. W.
,
van Beek
L. P. H.
&
Bierkens
M. F. P.
(
2010
)
Climate change will affect the Asian water towers
,
Science
,
328
(
5984
),
1382
1385
.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1183188
.
Kääb
A.
,
Bolch
T.
,
Casey
K.
,
Heid
T.
,
Kargel
J. S.
,
Leonard
G. J.
,
Paul
F.
&
Raup
B. H.
(
2014
)
Glacier mapping and monitoring using multispectral data
, In:
Global Land Ice Measurements From Space
,.
Springer
,
Berlin Heidelberg
, pp.
75
112
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-79818-7_4
.
Khan
A.
,
Naz
B. S.
&
Bowling
L. C.
(
2015
)
Separating snow, clean and debris covered ice in the Upper Indus Basin, Hindukush-Karakoram-Himalayas, using Landsat images between 1998 and 2002
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
521
,
46
64
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.11.048
.
Kraaijenbrink
P. D. A.
,
Bierkens
M. F. P.
,
Lutz
A. F.
&
Immerzeel
W. W.
(
2017
)
Impact of a global temperature rise of 1.5 degrees Celsius on Asia's glaciers
,
Nature
,
549
(
7671
),
257
260
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23878
.
Lippl
S.
,
Vijay
S.
&
Braun
M.
(
2018
)
Automatic delineation of debris-covered glaciers using InSAR coherence derived from X-, C- and L-band radar data: A case study of Yazgyl Glacier
,
Journal of Glaciology
,
64
(
247
),
811
821
.
https://doi.org/10.1017/jog.2018.70
.
Mölg
N.
,
Bolch
T.
,
Rastner
P.
,
Strozzi
T.
&
Paul
F.
(
2018
)
A consistent glacier inventory for Karakoram and Pamir derived from Landsat data: Distribution of debris cover and mapping challenges
,
Earth System Science Data
,
10
(
4
),
1807
1827
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/essd-10-1807-2018
.
Nazeer
A.
,
Maskey
S.
,
Skaugen
T.
&
McClain
M. E.
(
2022
)
Changes in the hydro-climatic regime of the Hunza Basin in the Upper Indus under CMIP6 climate change projections
,
Scientific Reports
,
12
(
1
),
21442
21458
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-25673-6
.
Nagai, H., Fujita, K., Nuimura, T. & Sakai, A., Southwest-facing slopes control the formation of debris-covered glaciers in the Bhutan Himalaya. The Cryosphere, 7 (4), 1303–1314. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-1303-2013
.
Nicholson
L.
&
Benn
D. I.
(
2006
)
Calculating ice melt beneath a debris layer using meteorological data
,
Journal of Glaciology
,
52
(
178
),
463
470
.
https://doi.org/10.3189/172756506781828584
.
Patel
A.
,
Prajapati
R.
,
Dharpure
J. K.
,
Mani
S.
&
Chauhan
D.
(
2019
)
Mapping and monitoring of glacier areal changes using multispectral and elevation data: A case study over Chhota-Shigri glacier
,
Earth Science Informatics
,
12
(
4
),
489
499
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-019-00388-x
.
Paul
F.
,
Huggel
C.
&
Kääb
A.
(
2004
)
Combining satellite multispectral image data and a digital elevation model for mapping debris-covered glaciers
,
Remote Sensing of Environment
,
89
(
4
),
510
518
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2003.11.007
.
Paul
F.
,
Frey
H.
&
Le Bris
R.
(
2011
)
A new glacier inventory for the European Alps from Landsat TM scenes of 2003: Challenges and results
,
Annals of Glaciology
,
52
(
59
),
144
152
.
https://doi.org/10.3189/172756411799096295
.
Paul
F.
,
Barrand
N. E.
,
Baumann
S.
,
Berthier
E.
,
Bolch
T.
,
Casey
K.
,
Frey
H.
,
Joshi
S. P.
,
Konovalov
V.
,
Le Bris
R.
,
Mölg
N.
,
Nosenko
G.
,
Nuth
C.
,
Pope
A.
,
Racoviteanu
A.
,
Rastner
P.
,
Raup
B.
,
Scharrer
K.
,
Steffen
S.
&
Winsvold
S.
(
2013
)
On the accuracy of glacier outlines derived from remote-sensing data
,
Annals of Glaciology
,
54
(
63
),
171
182
.
https://doi.org/10.3189/2013AoG63A296
.
Pellicciotti
F.
,
Stephan
C.
,
Miles
E.
,
Herreid
S.
,
Immerzeel
W. W.
&
Bolch
T.
(
2015
)
Mass-balance changes of the debris-covered glaciers in the Langtang Himal, Nepal, from 1974 to 1999
,
Journal of Glaciology
,
61
(
226
),
373
386
.
https://doi.org/10.3189/2015JoG13J237
.
Pratibha
S.
&
Kulkarni
A. V.
(
2018
)
Decadal change in supraglacial debris cover in Baspa Basin, Western Himalaya
,
Current Science
,
114
(
04
),
792
.
https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v114/i04/792-799
.
Qureshi
M. A.
,
Yi
C.
,
Xu
X.
&
Li
Y.
(
2017
)
Glacier status during the period 1973–2014 in the Hunza Basin, Western Karakoram
,
Quaternary International
,
444
,
125
136
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2016.08.029
.
Racoviteanu
A.
&
Williams
M. W.
(
2012
)
Decision tree and texture analysis for mapping debris-covered glaciers in the Kangchenjunga Area, Eastern Himalaya
,
Remote Sensing
,
4
(
10
),
3078
3109
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs4103078
.
Racoviteanu
A. E.
,
Williams
M. W.
&
Barry
R. G.
(
2008
)
Optical remote sensing of glacier characteristics: A review with focus on the Himalaya
,
Sensors
,
8
(
5
),
3355
3383
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/s8053355
.
Riggs, G. A. & Hall, D. K. (2015) MODIS Snow Products Collection 6 User Guide. NASA Land Data Operational Products Evaluation (LDOPE). https://landweb.modaps.eosdis.nasa.gov/data/userguide/MODIS-snow-user-guide-C6.pdf
Rittger
K.
,
Painter
T. H.
&
Dozier
J.
(
2013
)
Assessment of methods for mapping snow cover from MODIS
,
Advances in Water Resources
,
51
,
367
380
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2012.03.002
.
Robson
B. A.
,
Nuth
C.
,
Dahl
S. O.
,
Hölbling
D.
,
Strozzi
T.
&
Nielsen
P. R.
(
2015
)
Automated classification of debris-covered glaciers combining optical, SAR and topographic data in an object-based environment
,
Remote Sensing of Environment
,
170
,
372
387
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2015.10.001
.
Shafique
M.
,
Faiz
B.
,
Bacha
A. S.
&
Ullah
S.
(
2018
)
Evaluating glacier dynamics using temporal remote sensing images: A case study of Hunza Valley, northern Pakistan
,
Environmental Earth Sciences
,
77
(
5
),
162
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7365-y
.
Shea, J. M. & Immerzeel, W. W. (2016) An assessment of basin-scale glaciological and hydrological sensitivities in the Hindu Kush–Himalaya. Annals of Glaciology, 57 (71), 308–318. https://doi.org/10.3189/2016AoG71A073
.
Shrestha
S.
&
Nepal
S.
(
2019
)
Water balance assessment under different glacier coverage scenarios in the Hunza basin
,
Water
,
11
(
6
),
1124
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w11061124
.
Shrestha
M.
,
Koike
T.
,
Hirabayashi
Y.
,
Xue
Y.
,
Wang
L.
,
Rasul
G.
&
Ahmad
B.
(
2015
)
Integrated simulation of snow and glacier melt in water and energy balance-based, distributed hydrological modeling framework at Hunza River Basin of Pakistan Karakoram region
,
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
,
120
(
10
),
4889
4919
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD022666
.
Shukla
A.
&
Yousuf
B.
(
2017
)
Evaluation of multisource data for glacier terrain mapping: A neural net approach
,
Geocarto International
,
32
(
5
),
569
587
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10106049.2016.1161078
.
Shukla
A.
,
Gupta
R. P.
&
Arora
M. K.
(
2009
)
Estimation of debris cover and its temporal variation using optical satellite sensor data: A case study in Chenab basin, Himalaya
,
Journal of Glaciology
,
55
(
191
),
444
452
.
https://doi.org/10.3189/002214309788816632
.
Shukla
A.
,
Arora
M. K.
&
Gupta
R. P.
(
2010
)
Synergistic approach for mapping debris-covered glaciers using optical–thermal remote sensing data with inputs from geomorphometric parameters
,
Remote Sensing of Environment
,
114
(
7
),
1378
1387
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2010.01.015
.
Singh
V.
&
Goyal
M. K.
(
2018
)
An improved coupled framework for glacier classification: An integration of optical and thermal infrared remote-sensing bands
,
International Journal of Remote Sensing
,
39
(
20
),
6864
6892
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2018.1468104
.
Stephens
G. L.
,
O'Brien
D.
,
Webster
P. J.
,
Pilewski
P.
,
Kato
S.
&
Li
J.
(
2015
)
The albedo of earth
,
Reviews of Geophysics
,
53
(
1
),
141
163
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014RG000449
.
Tielidze
L. G.
,
Bolch
T.
,
Wheate
R. D.
,
Kutuzov
S. S.
,
Lavrentiev
I. I.
&
Zemp
M.
(
2020
)
Supra-glacial debris cover changes in the Greater Caucasus from 1986 to 2014
,
The Cryosphere
,
14
(
2
),
585
598
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-14-585-2020
.
Veettil
B. K.
&
Kamp
U.
(
2017
)
Remote sensing of glaciers in the tropical Andes: A review
,
International Journal of Remote Sensing
,
38
(
23
),
7101
7137
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2017.1371868
.
Vincent
C.
,
Ramanathan
A.
,
Wagnon
P.
,
Dobhal
D. P.
,
Linda
A.
,
Berthier
E.
,
Sharma
P.
,
Arnaud
Y.
,
Azam
M. F.
,
Jose
P. G.
&
Gardelle
J.
(
2013
)
Balanced conditions or slight mass gain of glaciers in the Lahaul and Spiti region (northern India, Himalaya) during the nineties preceded recent mass loss
,
The Cryosphere
,
7
(
2
),
569
582
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-7-569-2013
.
Wang
R.
,
Liu
S.
,
Shangguan
D.
,
Radić
V.
&
Zhang
Y.
(
2019
)
Spatial heterogeneity in glacier mass-balance sensitivity across high mountain Asia
,
Water
,
11
(
4
),
776
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w11040776
.
Wouters
B.
,
Gardner
A. S.
&
Moholdt
G.
(
2019
)
Global glacier mass loss during the GRACE satellite mission (2002–2016)
,
Frontiers in Earth Science
,
7
.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2019.00096
.
Wu
K.
,
Liu
S.
,
Jiang
Z.
,
Xu
J.
,
Wei
J.
&
Guo
W.
(
2018
)
Recent glacier mass balance and area changes in the Kangri Karpo Mountains from DEMs and glacier inventories
,
The Cryosphere
,
12
(
1
),
103
121
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-12-103-2018
.
Xie
F.
,
Liu
S.
,
Wu
K.
,
Zhu
Y.
,
Gao
Y.
,
Qi
M.
,
Duan
S.
,
Saifullah
M.
&
Tahir
A. A.
(
2020
)
Upward expansion of supra-glacial debris cover in the Hunza valley, Karakoram, during 1990 ∼ 2019
,
Frontiers in Earth Science
,
8
.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2020.00308
.
Yousuf
B.
,
Shukla
A.
,
Arora
M. K.
,
Bindal
A.
&
Jasrotia
A. S.
(
2020
)
On drivers of subpixel classification accuracy – An example from glacier facies
,
IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing
,
13
,
601
608
.
https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTARS.2019.2955955
.
Zhang
J.
,
Jia
L.
,
Menenti
M.
&
Hu
G.
(
2019
)
Glacier facies mapping using a machine-learning algorithm: The Parlung Zangbo Basin case study
,
Remote Sensing
,
11
(
4
).
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11040452
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Supplementary data