Skip to Main Content

Towards a Renewable Future: Assessing Resource Recovery as a Viable Treatment Alternative: Case Studies of Facilities Employing Extractive Nutrient Recovery Technologies

By
Ronald Latimer
Ronald Latimer
Search for other works by this author on:
Joseph Rohrbacher
Joseph Rohrbacher
Search for other works by this author on:
Vivi Nguyen
Vivi Nguyen
Search for other works by this author on:
Wendell O. Khunjar
Wendell O. Khunjar
Search for other works by this author on:
Samuel Jeyanayagam
Samuel Jeyanayagam
Search for other works by this author on:
IWA Publishing
Volume
15
ISBN electronic:
9781780407920
Publication date:
February 2016

Extractive nutrient recovery, defined as the production of chemical nutrient products devoid of significant organic matter, represents a complementary strategy for managing nutrients in multiple waste streams. In this option, energy and resources are used to accumulate and produce a chemical nutrient product that is recyclable and has a resale value that could potentially help offset operating costs while reducing nutrient production from raw materials for agricultural or other uses.

This report presents a compilation of case studies of water resource recovery facilities (WRRFs) at various stages of implementation of extractive nutrient recovery technologies in the form of struvite crystallization. Of the 20 WRRFs identified in this report, six have implemented or are implementing a struvite crystallization facility and seven have performed desktop and/or pilot evaluations. Data from these 13 utilities were used to develop the Tool for Evaluating Resource Recovery-Phosphorus (TERRY – Phosphorus), which was used to perform a conceptual level evaluation of implementing struvite recovery at seven other WRRFs.

Data from the full-scale WRRFs that have implemented struvite recovery indicate that sidestream soluble phosphorus removals ranged from 80 to 90%, while ammonia removal ranged from 7 to 30%. Struvite production ranged from 64 to 421 metric tonnes per year and was found to be dependent on the site-specific conditions and technology employed. Drivers for implementing nutrient recovery included reduction in supplemental carbon requirements for nitrogen removal, reduction in aeration requirements, reduction in biosolids production versus conventional treatment alternatives, reduction in costs associated with mitigating nuisance precipitate formation, benefits to sludge dewaterability, and benefits associated with manipulating the N and P content of the biosolids. Quantifying the economic and non-economic benefits of these drivers together with site-specific factors can help drive the implementation of resource recovery systems at full-scale WRRFs.

This title belongs to WERF Research Report Series

ISBN: 9781780407920 (eBook)

Towards a Renewable Future: Assessing Resource Recovery as a Viable Treatment Alternative: Case Studies of Facilities Employing Extractive Nutrient Recovery Technologies
By: Ronald Latimer, Joseph Rohrbacher, Vivi Nguyen, Wendell O. Khunjar, Samuel Jeyanayagam
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780407920
ISBN (electronic): 9781780407920
Publisher: IWA Publishing
Published: 2016

Download citation file:


×
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal