Skip to Main Content

Comparative Evaluation of Molecular and Culture Methods for Fecal Indicator Bacteria for Use in Inland Recreational Waters

By
Julie L. Kinzelman
Julie L. Kinzelman
City of Racine, Wisconsin Health Department
Search for other works by this author on:
Rebecca N. Bushon
Rebecca N. Bushon
United States Geological Survey, Ohio Water Science Center
Search for other works by this author on:
Samuel Dorevitch
Samuel Dorevitch
University of Illinois at Chicago, School of Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences
Search for other works by this author on:
Rachel T. Noble
Rachel T. Noble
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Institute of Marine Sciences
Search for other works by this author on:
IWA Publishing
Volume
10
ISBN electronic:
9781843395454
Publication date:
June 2011

Rapid analytical methods are likely to be incorporated into revised recreational water quality criteria by the US EPA (2012). While epidemiological studies have demonstrated a correlation of health effects to fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) as quantified by QPCR, there is a need to examine the relationship between EPA-approved culture-based methods and their QPCR-based equivalents prior to implementation. In particular, inland waters, including lakes, streams/rivers, and wastewater through the treatment process (as a source of environmental DNA) need to be assessed to determine whether they can be accurately managed using rapid QPCR based techniques. The goal of this research was to determine how EPA-approved culture-based and QPCR-based methods compared when a) inhibition caused underestimation, b) target bacteria were viable and/or non-viable, c) using a variety of different QPCR quantification approaches, d) related to pathogen densities, and e) analyses were performed in multiple laboratories (precision, accuracy, and other sources of variability).

Results indicate that all sites are not equal. While QPCR appeared to have satisfactory correlation to culture-based methods for FIB at some sites, including in process wastewater, it does not appear that the methods can be unilaterally applied across all inland water bodies. The lack of consistent correlation observed for some geographic locations and water body types could be attributed to different types of contamination sources (age and growth state of FIB), unresolved inhibition, method variability (between lab, development of calibration curves, extraction efficiency, method of result calculation, and limit of detection), and the relative contribution of DNA from viable vs. non-viable cells.

This title belongs to WERF Research Report Series.

ISBN: 9781843395454 (eBook)

Comparative Evaluation of Molecular and Culture Methods for Fecal Indicator Bacteria for Use in Inland Recreational Waters
By: Julie L. Kinzelman, Rebecca N. Bushon, Samuel Dorevitch, Rachel T. Noble
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/9781843395454
ISBN (electronic): 9781843395454
Publisher: IWA Publishing
Published: 2011

Download citation file:


×
This content is PDF only. Please click on the PDF icon to access.
Close Modal
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

Sign In or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal