Abstract
Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infection is estimated as the most serious waterborne infectious disease. NTM are ubiquitous in drinking water supply systems, which could be one of the possible exposure pathways for NTM disease, posing a serious concern to human health. Characteristics of NTM, such as exposure via inhalation, disinfectant resistance, survival in oligotrophic conditions, and association with amoebae, are largely different from those of Escherichia coli (E. coli) which has been traditionally regarded as a model bacterium causing gastrointestinal diseases in water safety. However, the fate of NTM in water supply systems from source water to the point of use has not been systematically revealed yet. Thus, this review proposes that NTM should be regarded as alternative model bacteria in water use by updating the current knowledge on the occurrence, removal efficiency, and regrowth of NTM in water supply systems. Moreover, we demonstrate the need to establish a comprehensive quantitative microbial risk assessment to identify the critical control point, which is indispensable to mitigate NTM risk in water use.
HIGHLIGHTS
Waterborne NTM are posing a significant health threat in many countries.
NTM are persistent and can regrow in drinking water, which is so different from traditional model bacterium (E. coli).
The fate of NTM from source to the point of use remains unclear.
Comprehensive risk assessment is lacking for NTM in water supply systems.
NTM can be new model bacteria to revisit the management of water supply systems.
Graphical Abstract
INTRODUCTION
The genus Mycobacterium in the phylum Actinobacteria contains over 200 species (Parte 2018). Nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are defined as Mycobacterium species other than Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex (MTC) and Mycobacterium leprae/lepromatosis (Vera-Cabrera et al. 2011; Fedrizzi et al. 2017). M. avium, M. intracellulare, and M. chimaera are designated as Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), which are related to human pulmonary infections (Busatto et al. 2019). NTM are ubiquitous in natural and human-associated environments (Falkinham 2015). As NTM can be persistent in drinking water supply system, they can transmit via water use including drinking (Thomson et al. 2013b; Zlojtro et al. 2015), showering (Gebert et al. 2018; Uwamino et al. 2020), spa (Nakanaga et al. 2011), and humidification (Utsugi et al. 2015). Exposure to pathogenic NTM through inhalation, oral ingestion, and dermal contact might result in pulmonary disease, disseminated infection, and skin/soft tissue infections, especially to immune-compromised people (Hamilton et al. 2017b; CDC 2019a). NTM infection is now one of the most severe waterborne illnesses in the United States, where the estimated number of deaths and direct healthcare cost of NTM infection is more extensive than that of other waterborne diseases (Collier et al. 2021). In parallel with an increase in the publications of overall NTM issues from 1996 to 2020 (Figure 1(a)), the number of papers on NTM related with topic for ‘drinking water OR water supply OR water distribution OR water use’ has also increased recently (Figure 1(b)). Diverse waterborne NTM species are prevalent in drinking water treatment trains (King et al. 2016; Wang et al. 2019a), drinking water distribution system (DWDS) (Gomez-Smith et al. 2015; Waak et al. 2019), premise plumbing (Feazel et al. 2009; Donohue et al. 2015), and point-of-use (POU) equipment (Falkinham et al. 2008; Gebert et al. 2018; Yoon et al. 2020). However, NTM are not yet routinely monitored, and little data is available to reveal the transmission route and infection source.
The characteristics of NTM are primarily different from those of Escherichia coli (E. coli) which has been studied as a model bacterium for gastrointestinal diseases in water supply systems (Edberg et al. 2000). The major exposure pathway of NTM is inhalation, while oral ingestion is a primary pathway of E. coli (Goslee & Wolinsky 1976). NTM are more resistant to disinfectants than E. coli (Taylor et al. 2000). Moreover, NTM can regrow in oligotrophic drinking water, while regrowth of E. coli is not considered (van der Wielen & van der Kooij 2013). Nevertheless, the fates of NTM in water supply systems are not fully revealed, resulting in uncertainties of quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) of NTM.
Thus, this review summarizes current knowledge on the occurrence, removal, and regrowth of NTM from source to POU in water supply systems, which is imperative to accurately identify critical control points and to mitigate potential health risks of waterborne NTM.
NTM INFECTION AND HEALTH IMPACT
NTM-related diseases
Although clinical studies have primarily focused on MAC and M. leprae (Mungroo et al. 2020; Goossens et al. 2021), some NTM are also potentially pathogenic to humans or animals (Falkinham 2016a). The pathogenic NTM can cause central nervous system disease, pulmonary, and skin/soft tissue infections in children, elderly individuals, especially patients with immunocompetent or immuno-compromised conditions, such as HIV-positive patients (Pedley et al. 2004; Adékambi 2009). NTM-related pulmonary infection is predominantly caused by MAC, M. chelonae, M. fortuitum, and M. abscessus (Kim & Shin 2017; Griffith & Daley 2021). Among the subspecies of M. avium, M. avium subsp. hominissuis is responsible for pulmonary infection, cervical lymphadenitis, and disseminated infection in humans (Busatto et al. 2019). M. kansasii, M. malmoense, M. simiae, M. szulgai, and M. xenopi can also be responsible for respiratory diseases (Lory 2014). On the other hand, M. chelonae, M. abscessus, M. haemophilum, M. ulcerans, M. marinum, M. smegmatis, and M. fortuitum can cause skin and soft tissue infections (Pedley et al. 2004; Lory 2014). In particular, M. ulcerans can cause a severe skin disease called Buruli Ulcer (BU) with the formation of ulcers on limbs (Maman et al. 2018). Some rapid-growing NTM can infect intravascular catheters and consequently cause bloodstream infections (El Helou et al. 2013). The prevalence of NTM disease in humans has been increasing around the world during the last decades (Henkle et al. 2015; Namkoong et al. 2016; Shah et al. 2016; Dakic et al. 2018; Greif et al. 2020; Harada et al. 2020; Lin et al. 2020; Park et al. 2020; Thomson et al. 2020). Table 1 shows the increase in the incidence rate of NTM disease in many countries and regions. Besides, in Japan, the increase in the annual mortality rate of NTM disease was reported from 0.63/100,000 population in 1997 to 1.93/100,000 population in 2016, especially in the old female population (Harada et al. 2020). Although the increasing trend of NTM disease could be due to the recognition of NTM diseases and the improvement of diagnosis methods, elderly people in aging society might be more susceptible to a NTM disease (Namkoong et al. 2016; Harada et al. 2020).
Country/Region . | Incidence rate per 100,000 persons per year . | Year . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
Japan | 5.7 | 2007 | Namkoong et al. (2016) |
14.7 | 2014 | ||
Taiwan | 5.3 | 2005 | Lin et al. (2020) |
14.8 | 2013 | ||
England, Wales, and Northern Ireland | 5.6 | 2007 | Shah et al. (2016) |
7.6 | 2012 | ||
Oregon, USA | 4.8 | 2007 | Henkle et al. (2015) |
5.6 | 2012 | ||
South Korea | 1.2 | 2005 | Park et al. (2020) |
4.8 | 2013 | ||
Uruguay | 0.33 | 2006 | Greif et al. (2020) |
1.57 | 2018 | ||
Serbia | 0.18 | 2010 | Dakic et al. (2018) |
0.48 | 2015 | ||
Queensland, Australia | 11.1 | 2001 | Thomson et al. (2020) |
25.8 | 2016 |
Country/Region . | Incidence rate per 100,000 persons per year . | Year . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|
Japan | 5.7 | 2007 | Namkoong et al. (2016) |
14.7 | 2014 | ||
Taiwan | 5.3 | 2005 | Lin et al. (2020) |
14.8 | 2013 | ||
England, Wales, and Northern Ireland | 5.6 | 2007 | Shah et al. (2016) |
7.6 | 2012 | ||
Oregon, USA | 4.8 | 2007 | Henkle et al. (2015) |
5.6 | 2012 | ||
South Korea | 1.2 | 2005 | Park et al. (2020) |
4.8 | 2013 | ||
Uruguay | 0.33 | 2006 | Greif et al. (2020) |
1.57 | 2018 | ||
Serbia | 0.18 | 2010 | Dakic et al. (2018) |
0.48 | 2015 | ||
Queensland, Australia | 11.1 | 2001 | Thomson et al. (2020) |
25.8 | 2016 |
Exposure routes of NTM infection
The most common waterborne exposure pathways leading to a mycobacterial infection include ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact, especially after repeated exposure to aerosols while showering (WHO 2004; CDC 2019a). A few cases of person-to-person transmissions have also been reported in studies (Ricketts et al. 2014; Bryant et al. 2016). However, the transmission route from environmental sources is currently gaining more attention. The possible ecological sources of NTM include soils, especially acidic or coastal soils, natural waters, drinking water, and aerosols (Falkinham 2015).
The water supply system could also be a possible exposure site for people to get NTM infection. A study reported that healthcare-associated outbreaks were related with M. abscessus colonization in municipal water use, such as tap water and heater-cooler unit (HCU) (Baker et al. 2017). HCU contaminated with M. chimaera was also reported to be correlated with the global epidemic of a cardiac surgery-related M. chimaera disease (van Ingen et al. 2017). Aerators of hand-washing machine also caused pseudo-outbreak of M. chimaera (Nakamura et al. 2019). Another study reported a relationship between the relative abundance of pathogenic NTM (MAC and M. abscessus) in showerheads and the prevalence of a NTM disease across cystic fibrosis patients (Gebert et al. 2018). In Japan, the recent significant increase in the number of patients with a MAC lung disease was suggested to be correlated with the lifestyle tendency towards showering (Uwamino et al. 2020). In the United States, a positive association between NTM isolated from shower aerosols and the MAC pulmonary disease was observed for Washington and Oregon residents, indicating that shower aerosols could be the potential exposure source in the household (Tzou et al. 2020). A pseudo-outbreak of M. gordonae nosocomial infection and M. gordonae lung disease was correlated with the presence of M. gordonae in potable tap water and ultrasonic humidifier, respectively (Utsugi et al. 2015; Zlojtro et al. 2015).
Some reports revealed that NTM isolated from the patients were genetically identical to NTM in the household. M. avium isolated from patients with a NTM lung disease had a clonal relationship with the M. avium found from water in kitchen and bathroom and biofilm in showerhead in the patient's home (Falkinham et al. 2008; Yoon et al. 2020). M. chimaera recovered from indoor showerhead biofilms was generically similar to respiratory M. chimaera isolates (Virdi et al. 2021). M. abscessus isolates were found to be identical in patients and in potable water (Thomson et al. 2013b). The isolates from patients with a chronic rhinosinusitis disease were clonally related to NTM isolates from household plumbing (Tichenor et al. 2012). These findings suggest that household plumbing and water use could be the possible route for NTM infection.
OCCURRENCE OF NTM IN SOURCE WATER
NTM are prevalent in natural water (Table 2). Mycobacterium sp. were detected from 94.28% of 70 samples in Kamp and Wulka Rivers in Australia (Delghandi et al. 2020). In the Han River in Korea, 59% of 76 surface water samples contained Mycobacteria spp., and M. gordonae was most frequently isolated (Lee et al. 2008). In China, 2.1×108–2.4×109 gene copies/L of Mycobacterium spp. and 3.5×104–2.3×105 gene copies/L of M. avium were quantified from source water for drinking water (Huang et al. 2021). In the United States, M. avium (2.2×104 ± 3.1×104 gene copies/L) and M. intracellulare (2.0×103 ± 1.8×103 gene copies/L) were detected from 25% (6/24) of surface water used for drinking water source (King et al. 2016). M. gordonae was observed more frequently in the distribution lines receiving treated surface water, while M. nonchromogenicum was frequently observed from the distribution system receiving groundwater with chlorine disinfection (Le Dantec et al. 2002b), indicating that water origins would affect the NTM species in the downstream system. However, the information on the prevalence of NTM in source water is limited. Thus, further study is necessary to reveal the impact of source water types and seasonal variation on the occurrence and diversity of NTM at the POU, which is informative for microbial risk assessment of source water for water supply.
aNTM with human pathogenicity.
bChlorinated water.
cChloraminated water.
dChlorine dioxide treated water.
eUntreated water.
fNTM without human pathogenicity.
THE FATES AND REMOVAL EFFICIENCY OF NTM IN DRINKING WATER TREATMENT PROCESSES
The occurrence of diverse NTM has been observed in drinking water treatment plant (DWTP) (Table 2); however, little is known about the removal efficiency of NTM in each treatment step.
In a DWTP in China, Mycobacterium spp. (2.2×107–3.6×108 gene copies/L) in raw water were removed to approximately 105 gene copies/L after sedimentation and ozonation (Wang et al. 2019a). While their abundances increased to around 106 gene copies/L after the subsequent granular activated carbon filtration, they were below 105 gene copies/L after sand filtration and chlorine disinfection (Wang et al. 2019a). However, in four DWTPs in China which treated surface water by coagulation/sedimentation, followed by combinations of sand filtration, ozonation, biological activated carbon (BAC) filtration, and disinfection (ClO2 or NaClO), the removal efficiencies of Mycobacterium spp. and M. avium were 81.4–99.9% and 97.2–99.6%, respectively, which were similar to those of bacterial 16S rRNA genes (94.4–99.4%) (Huang et al. 2021). In these plants, sedimentation removed Mycobacterium spp. by 37–59% and M. avium by 1.7–79%. The removal of NTM by sedimentation could be related to the adherence of hydrophobic NTM to particulates (Falkinham 2016b). BAC filtration and/or sand filtration removed M. avium by 10–58%, while Mycobacterium spp. rather increased after the filtration process, suggesting that some NTM might proliferate in filter media (Huang et al. 2021). In the final step of a DWTP, ClO2 inactivated Mycobacterium spp. and M. avium in the BAC filtration effluent by 83 and 97%, respectively (Huang et al. 2021).
NTM, such as M. gordonae and M. nonchromogenicum, were persistent even after ozonation (Lee & Deininger 2000). The relative abundance of 16S rRNA genes of Mycobacterium spp. increased after ozonation (Li et al. 2017), indicating that NTM could be relatively enriched after ozonation.
Disinfection in the treatment process is effective for inactivating pathogens. However, NTM have relatively high resistance to disinfection (Chiao et al. 2014). M. avium is generally 1,000-fold more resistant to chlorine than E. coli (Taylor et al. 2000). To achieve three log inactivation of M. chelonae and M. fortuitum, concentration–time (Ct) values of 100 and 135 mg·min/L of free chlorine were required in a laboratory-scale experiment, respectively, which are higher than the Ct value (60 mg·min/L) in water treatment lines (Le Dantec et al. 2002a). In the DWTP, M. mucogenicum, M. fortuitum, M. lentiflavum, M. triplex, and M. phocaicum were cultured from chlorinated or chloraminated water samples (12–80 CFU/L) (King et al. 2016). M. avium (2.1×103 ± 3.3×103 gene copies/L) and M. intracellulare (8.0×102 ± 1.4×103 gene copies/L) were detected from 24% of treated water by qPCR (King et al. 2016). Based on amplicon sequencing of 16S rRNA gene, the relative abundance of Mycobacterium spp. increased from 0.91 to 16.89% after chlorination (Guo et al. 2021). In a DWTP in Hubei province, China, the abundance of Mycobacterium spp. decreased in clear water tanks (free chlorine >0.1 mg/L after 30 min contact time), while their abundance in biofilm increased from around 3.2×107 to 7.9×108 gene copies/g (Lin et al. 2014), indicating that NTM were more persistent in biofilm state (Steed & Falkinham 2006; Sousa et al. 2015). Higher pH could deteriorate the disinfection efficiency of hypochlorite as the proportion of dissociated ClO− increases, which could not penetrate to mycobacterial cell due to repulsion (Wang et al. 2019b).
The higher resistance to disinfectants can be explained by several properties of NTM such as their specific cell wall, biofilm formation, and protection by free-living amoebae (FLA). The mycobacterial cell wall contains abundant mycolic acids, arabinogalactan, and peptidoglycan (Dulberger et al. 2020). The waxy outer membrane, rich in mycolic acids, is called mycomembrane, which is composed of lipids, glycolipids, and secreted proteins in the mycolic acid layer (Dulberger et al. 2020). The mycolic acids are composed of long carbon side chains (C60–C90) (Babalola 2015). The presence of the lipid- and wax-rich outer membrane allows NTM to adhere to surfaces and form biofilm (Falkinham 2016b) and protect NTM from physicochemical stresses including disinfection (Busatto et al. 2019; Wang et al. 2019b). NTM are capable of forming biofilm composed of extracellular matrix containing carbohydrates, lipids, proteins, and extracellular DNA (Sousa et al. 2015; Dokic et al. 2021). The biofilms can serve as a physical barrier, protecting NTM from disinfectants (Steed & Falkinham 2006). Planktonic M. avium, M. intracellular, M. gordonae, and M. chubuense are more susceptible to chlorine than those in biofilm (Steed & Falkinham 2006). FLA, such as Acanthamoeba spp. and Naegleria spp., can serve as the hosts for NTM, protecting them from external stress (Delafont et al. 2014). Intracellular colonization of NTM in FLA is one of the factors for NTM to survive disinfection (Steinert et al. 1998; Delafont et al. 2014). The association between NTM and FLA does play an essential role in helping NTM regrowth and survival in water systems. In hospital potable water systems, the high replication rate of M. avium was observed when they were only associated with Acanthamoeba lenticulata (Ovrutsky et al. 2013).
Based on the above studies, each treatment step positively or negatively contributes to NTM removal and inactivation. However, the fluctuation of NTM removal efficiency of different treatments remains unknown, which is vital in identifying the critical control points. As the removal efficiencies of E. coli and NTM could be different, it is necessary to optimize the treatment conditions for NTM.
THE REGROWTH AND PERSISTENCE OF NTM IN WATER DISTRIBUTION AND PREMISE PLUMBING
Water distribution system
Various NTM species have been identified in the DWDS (Table 2). NTM can regrow in drinking water with very low levels (<50 μg/L) of biodegradable organic carbon (Norton et al. 2004; van der Wielen & van der Kooij 2013). The growth of NTM can be promoted with the presence of Acanthamoeba, since they could release extracellular metabolites utilized by NTM (Steinert et al. 1998).
NTM can be attached to pipe surfaces due to their hydrophobic cell wall (Falkinham 2016b). Mycobacterium spp. occupied 25–78% of total bacterial community in the water main surface biofilm in the chloraminated drinking water system, regardless of the type of water main (tuberculated unlined cast-iron, nontuberculated unlined cast-iron, and cement-lined cast-iron water mains) (Gomez-Smith et al. 2015). They were the predominant microbial group (88% frequency of detection, 324 cell equivalent L−1) in a chlorinated DWDS in a major metropolitan area in the United States (Lu et al. 2016). In the DWDS in Paris, NTM abundances were 1–50 CFU/L for 78% of samples and 51–500 CFU/L for 21% of samples, where M. gordonae and M. nonchromogenicum were the most frequently isolated species (Le Dantec et al. 2002b). M. gordonae was also isolated from biofilm in a Beijing DWDS, while M. arupense was the major NTM species found in a Guangzhou DWDS (Liu et al. 2012).
Disinfection applied to the treated water could have a certain impact on the occurrence of NTM in the DWDS. MAC were detected at 106 gene copies/L in the DWDS receiving chlorinated water (0.1–1.3 mg/L), while they were detected at 107 gene copies/L in the DWDS receiving the chloraminated water (<0.05–3.8 mg/L) (Whiley et al. 2014). In a DWDS with residual chloramine (3.8 ± 0.1 mg/L), biofilm on water main consisted of M. gordonae (Waak et al. 2019). In another DWDS with chloramine (3.5 ± 0.2 mg/L), M. frederiksbergense was abundant in biofilm on water main (Gomez-Smith et al. 2015). The impact of other features of DWDS on NTM remains unclarified, including pipe material and water retention time.
In the Netherlands, disinfectant residual is not maintained in drinking water. Even under such condition, mycobacterial 16S rRNA gene copy numbers in the DWDS were 6–38 times higher than those in finished water, indicating that NTM can multiply in an unchlorinated DWDS (van der Wielen & van der Kooij 2013). Based on hsp65 gene sequencing, NTM in an unchlorinated DWDS were composed of M. avium, M. genavense, M. salmoniphilum, M. llatzerense, and M. gordonae (van der Wielen et al. 2013a).
Presence of NTM in premise plumbing and POU equipment
In premise plumbing with a relatively higher surface-to-volume ratio, water stagnation, and residual disinfectant decay, temperature elevation can occur frequently (WHO 2011; Prest et al. 2016). NTM have the potential to regrow in the premise plumbing systems (Haig et al. 2020) and have been suggested as an indicator of biofilm in a premise pipe (Lu et al. 2017). NTM were the most abundant taxon accounting for 85% of the Actinobacteria phylum in the tap water with 0.22–3.63 mg/L chlorine residuals in 16 different cities in the United States (Holinger et al. 2014). NTM regrowth was also observed at faucets after overnight water stagnation with simultaneous decline of residual chlorine (Rahmatika et al. 2022). Different NTM species can be persistent in the premise plumbing (Table 2). M. mucogenicum (percentage of culture-positive taps: 52%), M. avium (30%), M. gordonae (25%), M. intracellulare (20%), and M. kansasii (18%) were found from the potable water tap in the United States (Donohue et al. 2015). M. chimaera (73%) and M. avium (7%) were identified from bathroom and kitchen faucet and showerhead water in the United States by Internal Transcribed Spacer (ITS) sequencing (Wallace et al. 2013). Besides, M. abscessus, M. avium subsp. avium, M. chelonae, M. gordanae, M. intracellulare, and M. mucogenicum were also detected from chloraminated kitchen faucet water (an average of 2.04 mg/L as Cl2) in Michigan, the United States (Haig et al. 2018). In Mexico City, M. avium, M. mucogenicum, M. porcinum, M. gordonae, M. fortuitum, and M. cosmeticum were collected from household potable water with chlorine concentration of 0.2–1.5 mg/L (Perez-Martinez et al. 2013). In a northern city in China, NTM were detected from 100% of samples at an average abundance of 4.9×105 gene copies/L from tap water in washroom and kitchen with an average chlorine concentration of 0.09–0.14 mg/L in different buildings (Liu et al. 2019). In an eastern city in China, Mycobacterium spp. (7.4×107 gene copies/L) and M. avium (4.2×104 gene copies/L) were detected from tap water with ClO2 or hypochlorite residual (ClO−) of 0.17–0.39 mg/L (Huang et al. 2021). NTM (1–6×102 CFU/L) were detected from tap water in private buildings, schools, and hospitals in Rome, Italy (Briancesco et al. 2014b). In Seoul, Korea, 0–6 CFU/L of mycobacteria, such as M. lentiflavun and M. triplex, were detected from 91% of tap water samples with 0.64 mg/L free chlorine (Lee et al. 2008). Thus, household water could be the environmental niche for NTM.
NTM have been detected from other human-made water systems. NTM were the most dominant bacteria in showerhead biofilms across the United States (Feazel et al. 2009; Gebert et al. 2018) and Europe (Gebert et al. 2018), indicating that showerhead may offer the suitable environment for NTM to form biofilm. In Hawaii, M. chimaera, M. chelonae, M. abscessus, and M. porcinum were frequently detected from household showerhead biofilm (Virdi et al. 2021). In swimming pool water with free chlorine of 1.2 ± 0.2 mg/L, the abundances of NTM were 2.9×10–3.1×104 CFU/L (Briancesco et al. 2014b). M. mucogenicum and M. immunogenum represented the most frequently detected species from swimming pool water with free chlorine of 1.26 mg/L and biofilms (Briancesco et al. 2014a). In spa water with free chlorine of 1.66 ± 0.04 mg/L, 1.4×102 CFU/L NTM were observed, and the detected NTM species include M. mucogenicum, M. duvali, M. confluentis, M. lentiflavum, and M. goodii (Briancesco et al. 2014a). Spa waters also yielded MAC with concentrations of 4.3×107 and 4.5×106 CFU/L (Lumb et al. 2004).
NTM could easily adhere to air bubbles or aerosols due to hydrophobic cell property (Falkinham 2016b). The existence of NTM in the form of bioaerosol was reported by the surveillance of water and air (Glazer et al. 2007). About 104–106 CFU/L and 6–77 CFU/m3 of NTM were observed from 13/18 public hot tubs and warm water therapy pools disinfected by chlorine or bromine (Glazer et al. 2007). In halogen-treated therapy pool with residual halogen of 5.55 mg/L, 104–2.5×105 CFU/L of waterborne NTM and 6 CFU/m3 of airborne NTM were observed (Glazer et al. 2007). In heater-cooler devices, M. chimaera (67.4% of water samples) was the most common isolate from water, while M. mucogenicum, M. fortuitum, and M. abscessus/chelonae complex were recovered from air specimens (Kaelin et al. 2020). Since hot water systems could be good habitats for NTM, shower aerosols may be enriched with NTM (Pedley et al. 2004). M. abscessus, M. gordonae, M. mucogenicum, M. kansasii, M. fortuitum complex, and M. wolinskyi were isolated from household shower aerosols, while no M. intracellulare was isolated from shower aerosols (Thomson et al. 2013a). M. chelonae was isolated from the water reservoir of a misting humidifier in an eye clinic (Edens et al. 2015). A household ultrasonic humidifier filled with sterile tap water inoculated with M. abscessus or M. avium could aerosolize M. abscessus at 28.6 ± 16.1 CFU/m3 and M. avium at 445 ± 221 CFU/m3 (Hamilton & Falkinham 2018). These results imply that various water equipment and facilities could be the ideal reservoir for NTM, posing serious infection threat to human.
Some factors, such as water age (Haig et al. 2018), water temperature (Lu et al. 2017), pipe material (Gebert et al. 2018), and disinfection condition (Donohue et al. 2015; Gebert et al. 2018), could impact the regrowth of NTM. In a chloraminated premise plumbing system in the United States, the diversity of NTM community decreased as water age increased, and M. avium subsp. avium became predominated when the water age was higher than 27.5 h (Haig et al. 2018). The hot water system could be the ideal habitat for NTM (Wang et al. 2017). NTM showed higher densities in hot than cold tap water (Lu et al. 2017). Based on 16S rRNA gene sequencing, the relative abundances of NTM were higher in metal showerheads (around 15%) than in plastic showerheads (around 7%) (Gebert et al. 2018). The biofilm of M. avium was more enriched on iron pipe surfaces than on copper surfaces (Norton et al. 2004). Disinfection conditions also contribute to selection, survival, and proliferation for NTM in premise plumbing and POU (Le Dantec et al. 2002a; Gebert et al. 2018). NTM abundances in showerheads receiving chlorinated municipal water were higher than those receiving well water (Gebert et al. 2018). The average CFU counts of NTM in chlorinated tap water (208 CFU/L) were lower than those in tap water with chloramine (538 CFU/L) (Donohue et al. 2015).
The premise plumbing and POU equipment could be the hot spots determining the exposure level of NTM. Interventions and practical measures have been proposed to reduce the risk of pathogens in healthcare facilities (CDC 2019b). However, the regrowth potential of NTM has not been considered well. Therefore, some control measures, such as effective treatments, maintenance of sufficient residual disinfectants, prevention of water stagnation, and selection of proper materials of pipe and POU, should be considered to reduce NTM regrowth.
RISK ASSESSMENT OF NTM IN WATER USE
Significant risk of NTM in water use
In drinking water management, M. avium intracellulare and M. avium have been listed on the United States Environmental Protection Agency's drinking water contaminant candidate list 1 (CCL1) and 3 (CCL3) since 1998 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 1998) and 2009 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency 2009), respectively. The WHO alerted NTM in water safety in buildings (WHO 2011). Water management program for healthcare facilities has been proposed by the United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to mitigate the risk of pathogens in premise plumbing, which pays attention to the pathogens, including NTM, gram-negative bacteria, non-fecal coliforms, other bacteria/actinomyces, fungi, and protozoa (CDC 2019b). Many different NTM species are included in the list, as shown in Table 3, indicating that NTM are considered as a vital risk target (CDC 2019b). In 2021, CDC reported the estimation of burden and healthcare cost of 17 infectious waterborne diseases in the United States (Collier et al. 2021). In this report, among 7.15 million waterborne illnesses in 2014, total cases of NTM infection were estimated to be 97,000, of which 68,900 cases were suspected as domestically acquired waterborne, which was higher than Legionnaires’ disease (11,000) (Collier et al. 2021). About 6,630 deaths caused by domestically acquired waterborne illness were estimated, and 57% were attributed to NTM infection, indicating that NTM can be the largest waterborne risk in the United States (Collier et al. 2021). Domestic waterborne NTM infection also demonstrated the largest number of hospitalizations (51,400/118,000 hospitalizations) and the highest direct healthcare cost ($1.53 billion/$3.33 billion) in 2014 (Collier et al. 2021). This estimation clearly suggests that major waterborne illness in the United States has shifted from enteric illness to respiratory one and NTM are the most critical risk factor. In the Netherlands, NTM have been regarded to have high priority for further research based on the criteria of disease cases amount, epidemiology data, and occurrence possibility in drinking water (van der Wielen 2013a). Thus, risk assessment of NTM in the water supply system is urgent for appropriate interventions. However, the comprehensive risk assessment for NTM in water supply systems and water use is scarce.
Category . | NTM in premise plumbing . |
---|---|
NTM | • M. abscessus clade (M. abscessus, M. bolettii, M. massiliense) • M. chelonae • M. mucogenicum clade (M. mucogenicum, M. phociacum) • M. fortuitum clade (M. fortuitum, M. cosmeticum, mageritiense, M. porcinum, M. septicum) • M. immunogenum • M. smegmatis clade (M. goodii, M. wolinskyi) • M. aurum • M. simiae • M. avium complex (M. avium, M. intracellulare, M. chimaera, M. avium subsp. hominissuis, M. columbiense) • M. scrofulacuem • M. parascrofulaceum • M. xenopi • M. arupense • M. kansasii • M. haemophilum • M. nonchromogenicum clade (M. nonchromogenicum, M. triviale, M. terrae) • M. gordonae (only among patients with severe immune deficiency) |
Category . | NTM in premise plumbing . |
---|---|
NTM | • M. abscessus clade (M. abscessus, M. bolettii, M. massiliense) • M. chelonae • M. mucogenicum clade (M. mucogenicum, M. phociacum) • M. fortuitum clade (M. fortuitum, M. cosmeticum, mageritiense, M. porcinum, M. septicum) • M. immunogenum • M. smegmatis clade (M. goodii, M. wolinskyi) • M. aurum • M. simiae • M. avium complex (M. avium, M. intracellulare, M. chimaera, M. avium subsp. hominissuis, M. columbiense) • M. scrofulacuem • M. parascrofulaceum • M. xenopi • M. arupense • M. kansasii • M. haemophilum • M. nonchromogenicum clade (M. nonchromogenicum, M. triviale, M. terrae) • M. gordonae (only among patients with severe immune deficiency) |
Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA)
QMRA is used to determine the potential risk of pathogens. QMRA consists of four steps, which are (1) problem formulation including hazards and hazardous event identification and exposure pathways, (2) exposure assessment, (3) health effect assessment using the dose–response model, and (4) risk characterization (Haas et al. 2014; WHO 2016). Nowadays, QMRA is increasingly applied to evaluate the risk of waterborne pathogens in drinking water and to estimate the required treatment efficiency. Generally, the most popular reference pathogens used for risk assessment are Cryptosporidium, Giardia, and E. coli (Owens et al. 2020). Some studies have also been devoted to revealing health risks of Legionella in water supply systems, which can be closely related to NTM risk (Hamilton & Haas 2016; Hamilton et al. 2019).
A few studies have investigated QMRA for NTM in water use (Table 4). QMRA for M. avium in tap water in eastern China was evaluated using the exponential model (Huang et al. 2021). The daily dose of M. avium was computed based on the product of daily oral ingestion volume (7–71 mL/person) of raw tap water, cell number determined by qPCR (gene copies), ratio of viable cells (3.92×10−4), and human infectivity (0.1%). According to the calculation, the risk of M. avium in tap water was below the EPA risk benchmark (annual infection 10−4) (Huang et al. 2021).
NTM . | Exposure route . | Endpoint . | Dose–response modela,b,c . | Dose–response parameters . | Exposure assessment parameters . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAC | Inhalation (showering) | Sub-clinical/moderate pulmonary infection | Modified exponential model | r follows lognormal distribution (μ=−13.742, σ=0.208) C=500 | Breathing rate, shower duration, aerosol concentration, aerosol volume, deposition efficiency, recovery efficiency | Hamilton et al. (2017a) |
MAC | Inhalation (showering/toilet flushing) | Clinical severity pulmonary infection | Exponential model | r=3.12×10−9 | Inhalation rate, exposure duration, partitioning coefficient, fraction of respirable aerosol, retention rate, number of events per day | Kusumawardhana et al. (2021) |
MAC | Oral ingestion (drinking water) | Disseminated infection (immuno-compromised patients) | Beta-Poisson model | α=0.201, β=1.15×106 | Intake volume, recovery efficiency | Hamilton et al. (2017a) |
MAC | Oral ingestion (drinking water) | Cervical lymphadenitis in children | Exponential model | r follows lognormal distribution (μ=−19.006, σ=1.008) | Intake volume, recovery efficiency | Hamilton et al. (2017a) |
M. avium | Oral ingestion (drinking water) | Pulmonary infection | Exponential model | r=6.93×10−4 | Ingestion volume, viable fraction, human infectivity | Huang et al. (2021) |
M. avium | Oral ingestion (visiting fountain) | Pulmonary infection | Exponential model | r=6.93×10−4 | Exposure duration, ingestion frequency, droplet volume | Cui et al. (2017) |
M. avium | Oral ingestion (boating) | Pulmonary infection | Exponential model | r=6.93×10−4 | Exposure duration, ingestion rate | Cui et al. (2017) |
M. avium | Oral ingestion (playing with water) | Pulmonary infection | Exponential model | r=6.93×10−4 | Exposure duration, contact frequency, film thickness of water on hands, surface area of mouth-contacted hand | Cui et al. (2017) |
M. avium | Oral ingestion (walking) | Pulmonary infection | Exponential model | r=6.93×10−4 | Exposure duration, ingestion rate | Cui et al. (2017) |
M. avium | Oral ingestion (feeding fishes) | Pulmonary infection | Exponential model | r=6.93×10−4 | Exposure duration, ingestion rate | Cui et al. (2017) |
NTM . | Exposure route . | Endpoint . | Dose–response modela,b,c . | Dose–response parameters . | Exposure assessment parameters . | Reference . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MAC | Inhalation (showering) | Sub-clinical/moderate pulmonary infection | Modified exponential model | r follows lognormal distribution (μ=−13.742, σ=0.208) C=500 | Breathing rate, shower duration, aerosol concentration, aerosol volume, deposition efficiency, recovery efficiency | Hamilton et al. (2017a) |
MAC | Inhalation (showering/toilet flushing) | Clinical severity pulmonary infection | Exponential model | r=3.12×10−9 | Inhalation rate, exposure duration, partitioning coefficient, fraction of respirable aerosol, retention rate, number of events per day | Kusumawardhana et al. (2021) |
MAC | Oral ingestion (drinking water) | Disseminated infection (immuno-compromised patients) | Beta-Poisson model | α=0.201, β=1.15×106 | Intake volume, recovery efficiency | Hamilton et al. (2017a) |
MAC | Oral ingestion (drinking water) | Cervical lymphadenitis in children | Exponential model | r follows lognormal distribution (μ=−19.006, σ=1.008) | Intake volume, recovery efficiency | Hamilton et al. (2017a) |
M. avium | Oral ingestion (drinking water) | Pulmonary infection | Exponential model | r=6.93×10−4 | Ingestion volume, viable fraction, human infectivity | Huang et al. (2021) |
M. avium | Oral ingestion (visiting fountain) | Pulmonary infection | Exponential model | r=6.93×10−4 | Exposure duration, ingestion frequency, droplet volume | Cui et al. (2017) |
M. avium | Oral ingestion (boating) | Pulmonary infection | Exponential model | r=6.93×10−4 | Exposure duration, ingestion rate | Cui et al. (2017) |
M. avium | Oral ingestion (playing with water) | Pulmonary infection | Exponential model | r=6.93×10−4 | Exposure duration, contact frequency, film thickness of water on hands, surface area of mouth-contacted hand | Cui et al. (2017) |
M. avium | Oral ingestion (walking) | Pulmonary infection | Exponential model | r=6.93×10−4 | Exposure duration, ingestion rate | Cui et al. (2017) |
M. avium | Oral ingestion (feeding fishes) | Pulmonary infection | Exponential model | r=6.93×10−4 | Exposure duration, ingestion rate | Cui et al. (2017) |
aModified exponential model: , where Pd is the daily infection probability, d is the daily dose, r is the parameter, and C is the conversion factor.
bExponential model: , where Pd is the daily infection probability, d is the daily dose, and r is the parameter.
cBeta-Poisson model:, where Pd: Daily infection probability, d: daily dose, a and b: parameter.
The risk of NTM in recreational water was also evaluated for Beijing Olympic Forest Park in China (Cui et al. 2017). The concentration of M. avium (102−3 gene copies/100 mL) was determined by qPCR, and 95th percentile gene copies were used for QMRA. The oral ingestion was also assumed as exposure route, and the exponential dose–response model was used. The model was based on the oral route infection of M. avium subsp. paratuberculosis to red deer (O'Brien et al. 2006). Finally, the annual infection risks of M. avium (10−2–10−0) were greater than the EPA benchmark (10−4) (Cui et al. 2017).
QMRA of MAC was applied for different uses of roof-harvested rainwater in Australia (Hamilton et al. 2017a). Various infection scenarios including both ingestion route (undisinfected drinking water with and without filtration, showering, garden hose use, car washing, toilet flushing, and so on) and inhalation route (showering, garden hose use, car washing, and toilet flushing), and different types of persons including children with different ages and immuno-compromised population were considered for MAC dose calculation in this study. In addition, disparate health endpoints, such as pulmonary in general population (inhalation route), cervical lymphadenitis in children (ingestion route), and disseminated infection in immuno-deficient individuals (ingestion route), were also considered for the choice of exponential and Beta-Poisson dose–response models for MAC (Hamilton et al. 2017a). For oral ingestion exposure route including undisinfected drinking water with and without filtration, the total annual risks of all the scenarios were above 10−4 benchmark. On the other hand, the total annual MAC risks for inhalation exposure were below 10−4 benchmark (Hamilton et al. 2017a). It turned out that drinking water (ingestion route) exhibited the most significant MAC risks for susceptible populations, including children and the immuno-compromised (Hamilton et al. 2017a).
The health risks of MAC in aerosolized water from toilet flushing and showering using rainwater without prior treatments were assessed (Kusumawardhana et al. 2021). The dose via inhalation was estimated by considering the concentration of MAC in water, partitioning coefficient (the ratio of water to aerosol), inhalation rate, exposure duration, fraction of respirable aerosol, the retention rate of aerosol, and the number of events per day (Kusumawardhana et al. 2021). The health endpoint for inhalation of NTM aerosols is pulmonary infection, which was referred to Hamilton's study (Hamilton et al. 2017b). Annual infection risks of MAC from toilet flushing and showering were estimated to be lower than 10−7 (Kusumawardhana et al. 2021).
The limitations in QMRA for NTM
There are several limitations in application of QMRA to NTM in water supply systems and water use (Figure 2). For accurate estimation, abundances of NTM in water should be correctly quantified. The culture-based method can quantify viable bacteria, while it takes a longer time to enumerate slow-growing NTM and misses viable but nonculturable (VBNC) NTM (Hamilton et al. 2017a). While quantitative PCR is rapid, the conversion of gene copies to viable cells is sometimes overestimated (Kusumawardhana et al. 2021).
Inhalation or respiration of aerosol is a significant exposure pathway for NTM in water use (Goslee & Wolinsky 1976). However, accurate exposure estimation is complicated, which involves many parameters that have uncertainties (Table 4). Multiple assumptions might increase overall uncertainties. Besides, epidemiological evidence to connect human clinical NTM and waterborne NTM should be intensively confirmed.
Dose–response models for MAC were required with high priority to control opportunistic pathogens in premise plumbing (AWWA 1999). Seven new exponential dose–response models for human-relevant MAC have been proposed based on animal tests for different endpoints of NTM diseases (Hamilton et al. 2017b). Both the exponential model and the Beta-Poisson model were used for the oral ingestion dosage estimation of MAC or M. avium, while the exponential model was applied to inhalation of MAC (Table 4). However, differences in human susceptibilities to subspecies of MAC or other pathogenic NTM should be revealed for accurate evaluation (Casanova & Abel 2002).
In water engineering, the removal efficiency of NTM by water treatment has not been systematically studied. NTM are resistant to ozonation and disinfection, which does not allow us to simply apply an E. coli model to NTM. Moreover, the regrowth of NTM in water distribution and premise plumbing is highly dependent on environmental conditions, which increases uncertainties in risk assessment at the POU. The variation of NTM removal efficiency by each unit process and environmental conditions, which promote or mitigate their regrowth, should be incorporated to comprehensive QMRA to explore the critical control points in the water supply system.
OUTLOOKS
NTM are ubiquitous in water-related spots, including source waters, water treatment plants, distribution systems, and water use equipment. The frequent occurrence of pathogenic NTM, such as M. avium, M. intracellulare, M. gordonae, M. lentiflavum, and M. fortuitum in water supply systems, indicates that water could be a potential exposure route for NTM infection. NTM can survive the water treatment processes and rather proliferate in the distribution system and premise plumbing. However, the fate of NTM in water supply systems from source to the POU is still not clear due to the lack of monitoring data.
The health burden of waterborne NTM is increasing in many countries. Although the microbial risk of gastrointestinal diseases in water supply systems has been studied based on traditional model bacteria, such as E. coli, it is time to revisit the operation and management of water supply systems based on NTM. A comprehensive QMRA is necessary to clarify the current risk of NTM in water use and required interventions. Furthermore, cost-effectiveness analysis and/or cost–benefit analysis would be crucial to implement the identified interventions for monitoring/controlling NTM.
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTION
Y.G. and I.K. conceptualized the study, searched the literature, and wrote the original draft preparation. I.R., F.K., H.F., D.S., H.F., and Y.H. involved in writing the review and editing the manuscript. I.K. performed funding acquisition. I.K., F.K., and H.F. supervised the work.
FUNDING
This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI (Grant No. 20H02282).
ETHICAL APPROVAL
The authors state that ethical approval is not required because this is the review paper.
COMPETING INTERESTS
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.