Assessment of urban river sediment quality is paramount to understanding the impacts of urbanization on aquatic ecosystems and public health. The study evaluated the health impacts and sources of heavy metal pollutants in the Mangonbangon river, Tacloban City. With the abundance of heavy metal contaminants in the river sediment (Fe>Mn>Zn>Cu>Cr>Ni>Co), Hazard indices (HIs) ranged from 0.04 to 0.10 for adults and 0.31 to 0.90 for children suggesting little or no non-carcinogenic effects to the population. Lifetime cancer risk (LCR) is below the tolerable threshold of 10−4, with Co contributing 61% of the cancer risk. Using unconstrained ordination and the GIS-based method (UOGM), we showed two non-multidimensional scaling groups of pollutants distributed based on dwelling density, presence of informal settlers, and types of activity at the sample sites. Given that sampling was performed three years after the city-wide destruction by Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda), our analysis indicates the return of anthropogenic activities and pollution-related health problems in Tacloban. Our results reinforce the urgent need for proper river management and economic zoning to help curb the rapidly growing heavy metal pollution problem at its earliest stage.

  • Heavy metal pollution in the river was mainly from municipal discharge.

  • Co poses the highest cancer risk among the carcinogenic metals.

  • Non-multidimensional scaling analysis combined with GIS identified Co as anthropogenic.

  • Three years after Typhoon Haiyan, the heavy metal profile suggested the resurgence of anthropogenic activity.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract

Toxic metal species are a globally recognized environmental concern because they pose a pressing threat to the aquatic environment and human life with their persistence and toxicities (Kumar et al. 2019, 2021a). As a result of anthropogenic activities, they seep into bodies of water through point sources, such as industrial, municipal, and domestic wastewater effluents, and through secondary pathways via surface runoff, erosion, or atmospheric deposition (Pericherla et al. 2020; Ali et al. 2022). The affected aquatic biota is vulnerable, especially benthic organisms since trace metals from the sediments accumulate in the food chain (Khan et al. 2015). When the physicochemical and hydrodynamic conditions change in bodies of water, sediment heavy metals are resuspended resulting in dispersion and secondary pollution (de Souza Machado et al. 2016).

Rapid industrialization exacerbates heavy metal pollution in aquatic ecosystems (Kumar et al. 2020a). This phenomenon is particularly true for densely populated cities in developing countries that do not adequately implement municipal waste management systems to prevent the indiscriminate discharge of wastes into rivers and lakes (Haghnazar et al. 2021; Kumar et al. 2021b; Bhat et al. 2022). The majority of studies on heavy metal pollution in urban areas in the Philippines focused on Manila (Prudente et al. 1994; Gorme et al. 2010; Paronda et al. 2019) and the City of Meycauayan (Bulacan), the latter being considered one of the most polluted cities in the developing world (Diwa et al. 2021a). Moreover, the impact of urbanization on heavy metal pollution in the aquatic environment outside these urban hotspots has been hardly addressed (Decena et al. 2018) except for investigations focused on the impact assessment of mining activities in the provinces, particularly in the Mindanao and Palawan group of islands (Cabuga et al. 2020; Ebol et al. 2020; Diwa et al. 2022).

Tacloban City, a city outside of the National Capital Region, posted one of the highest urbanization rates in the country (https://www.tacloban.gov.ph/). Alongside its rapid development, informal settlements proliferated on vacant government lots along riverbanks and creeks. In a 2011 survey, 38% of the total population in 37 barangays were informal settlers (Rahman & Ferdous 2011). However, when Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda) struck in 2013, Tacloban became the worst-hit region in the Philippines. All the informal settlements along the coastal areas and riverbanks were wiped out. During the first years after the devastation, the homeless survivors moved to emergency and temporary housing tenements built by non-governmental organizations, international donors, and the government. Although there were programs for socialized permanent housing settlements in safer locations by the government, the affected residents were reluctant as the locations were too far from their former urban and coastal livelihoods. As a result, many houses from the informal sector were rebuilt from the debris of the disaster (Hara et al. 2018).

Heavy metal contamination from the Mangonbangon river, which cuts across Tacloban City, was assessed in 2016 by Decena et al. (2018). Incidentally, the study provided a snapshot of the rebirth of heavy metal pollution as sampling was implemented three years after the devastation by Typhoon Haiyan. Ten trace metals were detected and the magnitude of the average concentrations followed the order: Fe>Mn>Zn>Cu>Cr>Ni>Co (Decena et al. 2018). From the multivariate analysis, Cu, Cr, Ni, and Fe were in the same cluster that indicated anthropogenic sources of heavy metals. This study aims to re-visit the 2016 Mangonbangon river data and dissect nuances of source apportionment by applying a recently developed GIS-based geostatistical modeling technique (Gu & Gao 2019). We hypothesized that the apportionment profile may differ and can add new information to assist the local government in developing targeted and practical strategies to address the toxic heavy metal sources. This study is also timely and relevant given the renewed calls for rehabilitation and preservation of the Mangonbangon river as new structures encroach on the aquatic systems and other dangerous areas in the city.

Study area

The 4-km Mangonbangon river, which traverses informal settlements and commercial areas in the city, flows from an upstream wetland and drains into the San Juanico Strait. Tacloban city, a first-class highly urbanized city and the provincial capital of Leyte Island, has 251,881 inhabitants and a population density of 2,377 km2 based on the 2020 population and housing census (Philippine Statistics Authority 2020). According to the Corona classification system, the region has a Type II climate characterized by an absence of a dry season and heavy rainfall from November to January. The average annual temperature is 27.2 °C, with the highest monthly temperature of 31.4 °C occurring in May and August, and the lowest being at 22.7 °C in February. Farming (rice, coconut, and sugarcane), fishing, and mining are the main economic activities in the region. Forestry workers and farmers account for around 20% of the workforce. Despite being a coastal city, only 3.6% of the workforce in Tacloban works in the fishing sector (Marteleira et al. 2017; Decena et al. 2018).

Heavy metal data analysis

The data analyzed were from the heavy metal pollution assessment study conducted by Decena et al. (2018). Briefly, sediment samples were collected from 14 sampling stations along the Mangonbangon river in 2016 (Figure 1). The samples were taken at 0–15 cm depth, placed in polyethylene zip-lock bags to minimize sediment oxidation, and stored in a cold place for four days until analysis. The <63 μm fraction of the ground samples was digested using a combination of H2SO4, H3PO4, HNO3, and HBF4 in a microwave digester. The concentrations of Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Mn, Ni, and Zn were analyzed in three replicates using an air-acetylene flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (AAS) (Shimadzu AA 6300). Laboratory quality assurance and control such as analysis of blanks, calibration using standards, and recovery of known additions were in place to ensure the integrity of analytical results. Decena et al. (2018) reported the recoveries of known additions as follows: Co (93.95%), Cr (101.20%), Cu (112.13%), Fe (114.77%), Mn (112.30%), Ni (97.09%), and Zn (82.30%).
Figure 1

Location map and description of the sampling stations in Mangonbangon river sampled by Decena et al. Description of the 14 sampling sites upstream (U), midstream (M), and downstream (D) of the urban river.

Figure 1

Location map and description of the sampling stations in Mangonbangon river sampled by Decena et al. Description of the 14 sampling sites upstream (U), midstream (M), and downstream (D) of the urban river.

Close modal

Health risk assessments

Several models following the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) guidelines were used to assess the human health risks associated with heavy metal exposure (Means 1989). The Hazard Index (HI) and Lifetime Cancer Risk (LCR) estimate the non-carcinogenic and carcinogenic risks due to heavy metal exposure, respectively. The risk models differentiated adults from children because of their differing physiology and behavior relevant to health risk estimates (Hu et al. 2017).

Chronic daily intake (CDI) evaluates the dose received through each of the exposure pathways (US EPA 2011). Exposure to heavy metals can occur via the following pathways: (1) incidental ingestion of the sediments, (2) dermal contact with the sediments, and (3) inhalation of particles emitted from the sediments. Considering the three exposure pathways, CDI was calculated using the following equations:
formula
(1)
formula
(2)
formula
(3)
where Csoil is the heavy metal concentration (mg kg−1) in the soil; RI is the ingestion rate (mg d−1): 100 for adults and 200 for children; EF is the exposure frequency (d yr−1)) or the number of days in a year an individual is exposed to the heavy metal: 350 for residential; ED is the exposure duration (yr): 23 for adults and 6 for children; BW is the body weight (kg): 70 for adults and 15 for children; AT is the averaging time (d) or time period which the dose is averaged: ED x 365 for non-carcinogenic and 70×365 for carcinogenic; SA is skin surface area available per event of heavy metal exposure (cm2 event−1): 5,700 for adults and 2,800 for children; AF is the soil to skin adherence factor (mg cm−2): 0.07 for adults and 0.2 for children; ABS is the dermal absorption factor (unitless): 0.001 for the heavy metals identified; and PEF is soil-to-air particle emission factor (m3 kg−1): 1.36 × 109. The difference between the ATs is that non-carcinogenic AT averages the period an individual was exposed to the heavy metals while the carcinogenic AT averages the period an individual will be exposed to carcinogens during its lifetime. The behavioral and physiological differences between adults and children also affect the parameters for estimating CDI (Kamunda et al. 2016). For instance, the RI in children is twice that in adults under the assumption that children ingest twice as much substance from soils as adults. The values used for the calculation of the CDI were derived from US EPA (2002).
The Hazard Quotient (HQ) estimates the probable non-carcinogenic effects of an individual heavy metal. To deduce the combined effects of several heavy metals, the sum of HQs from the individual heavy metals constitutes the Hazard Index (HI) (Xu et al. 2011):
formula
(4)
formula
(5)
where RfD (mg kg−1 d−1) or the chronic reference dose of the heavy metals estimates the amount of daily exposure to a particular heavy metal that will unlikely cause detrimental effects during a lifetime (US EPA 1993). The values of RfD are different for each heavy metal for each exposure pathway (Weissmannová et al. 2019). Further, the HQs of the heavy metals at different exposure pathways were calculated. An HI or HQ > 1 indicates a significant non-carcinogenic risk with a higher value indicating greater potential risks (Judson et al. 2012).
The Cancer Risk (CR) estimates the probability of cancer development from exposure to each metal species. Lifetime Cancer Risk (LCR) accounts for the cancer risk of all the heavy metals (Means 1989). CR and LCR were calculated using the equations:
formula
(6)
formula
(7)
where SF is the carcinogenicity slope factor (mg kg−1 d−1) of the heavy metal: 9.8 for Co, 0.42 for Cr, and 0.84 for Ni (Faiz et al. 2012). SF transforms the lifetime average daily intake of a carcinogenic metal into an incremental risk of developing cancer (USEPA 1989). The CRs of Co, Cr, and Ni through the inhalation pathway were calculated. The range of carcinogenic risk is as follows: very low (<10−6), low (10−6–10−5), medium (10−5–10−4), high (10−4–10−3), and very high ( > 10−3) (Weissmannová et al. 2019).

Unconstrained ordination- and GIS-based method (UOGM)

We applied the newly developed method of UOGM to identify the sources of heavy metal pollution in the Mangonbangon river. The approach followed three successive steps. First, the Enrichment Factor (EF) was calculated to differentiate heavy metals of anthropogenic and natural origins. Second, the source patterns of the heavy metals were determined using a non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMS). And lastly, to spatially evaluate anthropogenic influences, the NMS scores were interpolated and visualized. The results were visualized using weighted colors of the NMS scores to elucidate the spatial variation of the heavy metal pollutants since interpolation is not possible in a linear body like a stream or river.

Using Fe as a normalizer, the EFs of the heavy metals from the sediments are presented in Decena et al. (2018). NMS was performed using Bray-Curtis distance measure at 30 random initial starting configurations using the vegan package of R (ver. 4.0.4). Like the Principal Component Analysis (PCA), NMS is a multivariate analysis that reduces the dimensionality of the dataset (Dexter et al. 2018). The position of the objects in the reduced dimensions is useful in identifying the underlying patterns and similarities between the species. However, in contrast to PCA, NMS uses a rank-order (non-metric) relationship between inter-sample dissimilarity and inter-sample distance instead of a linear combination to produce an ordination (Fasham 1977). Since NMS does not assume a linear relationship, the distance measured is suitable for any data, and the method can also determine the best positions of the objects in the reduced dimensions. Unlike other ordination techniques, NMS employs ‘stress’ or the measure of similarity between the best configuration and the original multidimensional space to evaluate the fit of the ordination (Dexter et al. 2018).

Heavy metal concentrations and their health risk indices

Table 1 shows the descriptive statistics for heavy metals from surface sediments of the Mangonbangon River sampled in 2016. The mean heavy metal concentrations were in the following order: Fe > Mn > Zn > Cu > Cr > Ni > Co (Decena et al. 2018). The sediment materials obtained from the 14 sampling stations along the river showed low variations in Fe, Zn, and Mn concentrations. For the remaining heavy metals, particularly Co, there was a high CV % observed which indicates anthropogenic origins since previous studies have shown that heavy metals with high variations in concentrations are usually associated with human activities (Zhou & Wang 2019). Recent comparisons of heavy metal concentrations from sediments of different rivers showed that levels of Cr and Ni at the Mangonbangon river did not exceed the values from the Tigris (Turkey), Ganga (India), and Korotoa (Bangladesh) rivers. However, there were higher levels of Co and Ni in the Mangonbangon river relative to that of estuaries in Malaysia (Asare et al. 2022). The Mangonbangon River also has more than thrice the Ni as in the Meycauayan River, one of the world's top 30 dirtiest river systems (Diwa et al. 2021a).

Table 1

Statistics of heavy metal concentration (mg kg−1) in surface sediments of the Mangonbangon River from 14 sampling stations (Decena et al. 2018)

CoCrCuFeMnNiZn
Mean 15.3 89.4 116.4 22,006.1 262.0 61.1 213.7 
STDEV 6.3 30.5 42.5 4,052.4 66.6 21.4 45.8 
Minimum 4.1 32.8 29.4 12,934.0 170.7 12.1 76.8 
Maximum 25.3 131.8 217.1 27,332.0 405.5 98.1 263.6 
CV (%) 41.1% 34.1% 36.5% 18.4% 25.4% 35.0% 21.4% 
Average shale 19 90 45 47,200 850 68 95 
CoCrCuFeMnNiZn
Mean 15.3 89.4 116.4 22,006.1 262.0 61.1 213.7 
STDEV 6.3 30.5 42.5 4,052.4 66.6 21.4 45.8 
Minimum 4.1 32.8 29.4 12,934.0 170.7 12.1 76.8 
Maximum 25.3 131.8 217.1 27,332.0 405.5 98.1 263.6 
CV (%) 41.1% 34.1% 36.5% 18.4% 25.4% 35.0% 21.4% 
Average shale 19 90 45 47,200 850 68 95 

Heavy metals have toxicological effects on humans as Co, Cr, and Ni identified in the Mangonbangon River are known carcinogens (Briffa et al. 2020). With the high population density along the riverbank due to informal settlements, it is critical to assess the heavy metal risk exposure of the population. We, therefore, calculated the Hazard Index (HI) and Lifetime Cancer Risk (LCR) values. These risk models have been extensively used to assess health risks from toxic elements in several media and types of exposures, i.e., ingestion, inhalation, and dermal contact (Weissmannová et al. 2019).

A summary of HI and LCR values for the heavy metals from the different sampling sites is shown in Figure 2. The HI or potential non-carcinogenic outcome of heavy metal exposure at each sampling site represents the sum of the Hazard Quotients (HQ) of individual heavy metals (Figure 2(a)). As a rule of thumb, a higher value for HI and HQ suggests a higher level of concern. The HI values or non-carcinogenic health risks from the heavy metals in the river ranged only from 0.04 to 0.10 for adults and 0.31–0.90 for children. Of note, the HI values suggested no adverse effects for both age groups living near the river. On the other hand, the mean HQ contribution of the heavy metals to the overall HI for both adults and children is Cr (68.6%) > Mn (16.7%) > Ni (6.0%) > Cu (5.7%) > Co (1.5%) > Zn (1.4%) (Figure 2(b)). The results recognize chromium as a pervasive and toxic environmental contaminant, albeit low risk. While a minimal toxic effect is linked to trivalent chromium even when present in large quantities, acute and chronic toxicity of chromium is attributed mainly to the hexavalent compounds. Dermatitis, skin ulceration, and gastroenteritis are some of toxic reactions from the exposure to hexavalent chromium compounds (DesMarias & Costa 2019).
Figure 2

The health risk assessments indicate that there are no probable non-carcinogenic effects on both adults and children according to (a) HI. The contribution of the heavy metals to the HI is shown in (b). The LCR in all the sampling stations is below the tolerable limit of 10−4, indicating that there is no probable carcinogenic risk to the population (c). The contribution of the heavy metals to the LCR is shown in (d).

Figure 2

The health risk assessments indicate that there are no probable non-carcinogenic effects on both adults and children according to (a) HI. The contribution of the heavy metals to the HI is shown in (b). The LCR in all the sampling stations is below the tolerable limit of 10−4, indicating that there is no probable carcinogenic risk to the population (c). The contribution of the heavy metals to the LCR is shown in (d).

Close modal

On the other hand, LCR is a measure of the potential for the population to develop cancer as a function of both metal toxicity and exposure doses. An LCR value that exceeds 10−4 is associated with a high risk of developing cancers. As seen in Figure 2(c), the LCRs for both adults and children are below 10−4, indicating no carcinogenic risk to the population. Moreover, our results show the sampling sites with the highest LCRs for adults and children: MS04, MS06, MS07, MS08, DS09, DS10, DS11, and DS14 (Figure 2(c)). It is noteworthy that these sites were in the river's midstream and downstream segments and where the informal settlements dominate. Localized small-scale point sources, like metal works, auto shops, gas stations, and commercial areas, are also present (Decena et al. 2018). Among the three dominant carcinogenic metals, the mean CR contribution of the heavy metals to the LCR for both adults and children is Co (60.7%) > Ni (22.8%) > Cr (16.5%), as shown in Figure 2(d). The genotoxic activity of Co is generally associated with its ability to generate reactive oxygen species (ROS) via a Fenton-like reaction. Co is also known to modify various cellular proteins, like zinc finger motifs, disrupting DNA metabolic activities and genome stability (Lison et al. 2018).

Anthropogenic sources of the heavy metals

To distinguish whether the carcinogenic heavy metals are from anthropogenic or natural sources, we applied UOGM by first calculating the enrichment factor (EF) for each heavy metal. EF is a popular tool used to assess the intensity of anthropogenic pollutant deposition on soils and sediments. It is regarded as a good indicator of enrichment by anthropogenic influences because it allows the comparison of heavy metal concentrations from the sediment versus the background (Barbieri 2016). Background concentrations are geogenic natural content in the soil before anthropogenic inputs (Cicchella et al. 2005). The criteria used by other investigators to infer heavy metal apportionment are as follows: <0.5, natural; 0.5≤EF≤1.5, either natural or anthropogenic; and > 1.5, mainly anthropogenic (Gu et al. 2016).

Decena et al. (2018) calculated the EFs of the heavy metals from surface sediments of the Mangonbangon River and normalized sediment Fe concentration using the value from average shale (Turekian & Wedepohl 1961) (Figure 3). In the absence of data on pre-industrial metal concentrations, crustal abundances, like that from the average shale, can provide the background concentrations for the sediments (Diwa et al. 2021b). From the study, Mn was both natural and anthropogenic because the EF value was > 0.5 and ≤1.5. The rest of the heavy metals (Co, Cr, Cu, Fe, Ni, and Zn) had EF values > 1.5 suggesting predominantly anthropogenic origins.
Figure 3

The mean Enrichment Factors (EF) of the heavy metals in the surface sediments of the Mangonbangon River. The error bars represent the standard deviation.

Figure 3

The mean Enrichment Factors (EF) of the heavy metals in the surface sediments of the Mangonbangon River. The error bars represent the standard deviation.

Close modal
Given the lack of clarity in the source identification, our group performed additional tests to substantiate the hypothesis on the anthropogenic nature of Co, Cr, Cu, Ni, and Zn, including Mn. As an alternative to PCA (Setia et al. 2021), we conducted the NMS analysis using the Bray-Curtis distance measure. Based on the approach of heavy metal source apportionment in marine sediments in Hong Kong (Gu & Gao 2019), our analysis identified two dimensions and two convergent solutions after 30 tries. To check the validity of the analysis, we calculated the ‘stress’ values. The obtained value of 0.1108873 is classified as ‘likely good for interpretation’. Shown in Figure 4 is the relationship among the heavy metals based on the NMS ordination. As indicated, the heavy metals clustered into two groups associated with the two NMS dimensions (i.e., NMDS 1 and NMDS 2). NMDS 1 and NMDS 2 are the reduced dimensions that control the variance in the dataset and group the heavy metals according to their sources (Gu & Gao 2019). The first group consisting of Cr, Cu, and Ni was associated with the non-metric dimensional scale (NMDS) 1. Associated with NMDS 2, the second group (Co, Mn, and Zn) was likely from anthropogenic sources.
Figure 4

The clustering of the heavy metals in the surface sediments of the Mangonbangon River according to the NMS ordination. The second combined figures show the spatial distribution of NMDS 1 and NMDS 2 using weighted colors.

Figure 4

The clustering of the heavy metals in the surface sediments of the Mangonbangon River according to the NMS ordination. The second combined figures show the spatial distribution of NMDS 1 and NMDS 2 using weighted colors.

Close modal

To shed light on the nature of the heavy metal sources, we finally used GIS to understand the spatial variation in NMS ordination. Since interpolation was not possible for a linear body like a river, we used circles showing the weights of the influences of the two dimensions identified by NMS. Figure 4 illustrates the different areas along the river as influenced by NMDS 1 and NMDS 2. We noted a striking relationship between the NMS ordination distribution with dwelling density and types of activity at the sample sites. NMDS 1 consistently influenced sampling stations with high dwelling density and informal settlements. Through Google Map visualization of the sampling areas (upstream: US03; midstream: MS04, MS05; downstream: DS09, DS10, DS11, DS12, DS13), we notice the high density of informal settlements along the downstream segment. Given the lack of municipal services and the challenges by the informal settlers in Tacloban city (Yee 2018), we assume that a considerable amount of sewerage and garbage drains from these areas. Thus, it was highly probable that Cr, Cu, and Ni, associated with NMDS 1, are from the municipal wastes coming from high-density dwelling areas along the river (Ishchenko 2019). Meanwhile, we observed a generally decreasing trend in NMDS 2 from the upstream to downstream sampling stations. The NMDS 2-associated heavy metals (Co, Mn, and Zn) can be ascribed to agricultural activities from upstream wetlands and localized small-scale industrial activities along the river. These heavy metals are usually in trace amounts in phosphate fertilizers (El-Taher & Althoyaib 2012) and steel production (Horn et al. 2021). The observed diminishing trend for NMDS 2 from upstream to downstream stations supports the hypothesis that these heavy metals originated from point sources such as upstream farms and localized sources, like metalworks and auto shops near the river.

Some perspectives on the application of non-metric multidimensional scaling

To extract interpretable patterns from the heavy metal data in the Mangonbangon river, Decena et al. (2018) employed both clustering and linear multivariate analyses. PCA was used to visualize the relationship among heavy metals in a continuous vector space by creating a subspace that captures the salient features of the data set. In doing so, there can be instances where data dimensionality may be insufficiently low with information compression (Camacho et al. 2020). Thus, in principle, such a method may not always be robust. Consequently, the previous investigators failed to pinpoint the specific sources despite attributing the heavy metals (Cr, Cu, Mn, Ni, and Zn) to anthropogenic activities (Decena et al. 2018). Our analysis significantly differed from the results in Decena et al. (2018) since we were able to show that Co was a product of anthropogenic activities in specific areas along the river. From these findings, we also highlighted the robustness of the UOGM.

NMS combined with GIS is a compelling approach since insights from spatial information and geographic features aid the increased data dimensionality from NMS. However, this approach also has limitations. A major drawback is that NMS sometimes fail to find the best configuration after getting stuck on local minima. However, this technical issue can be surmounted by computing for multiple ordinations. Given the superior performance in identifying sources of environmental pollution, there are only a handful of published examples of NMS (Gu et al. 2018; Gu & Gao 2019).

Lastly, we also noted two critical insights from our results. First, as Tacloban City became one of the worst-hit regions when Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda) passed the Visayas on 8 November 2013, the entire city was destroyed. With winds reaching 315 km/h, the super typhoon decimated all residential areas as it was the strongest and most destructive to have made landfall in Philippine history (Santos 2013). With Tacloban city given a chance to re-build (or ‘re-boot’) itself and strictly implement its urban settlement and zoning programs, the heavy metal profiles of the Mangonbangon river three years after the Typhoon Haiyan (Yolanda) indicate the return of anthropogenic activities and the ‘age-old’ pollution problems. Second, despite the low EF of Co, its source identification is not trivial because it had the most significant contribution to the LCR in the population. Note that Co metal and its compounds are used in the production of alloys, cemented carbides, and hard metals. It is also used as catalysts, drying agents in paints, and additives in animal feed and pigments. This case, so to speak, allowed us to identify the ‘gorilla in the room’ of heavy metal toxicants.

There is an enrichment of heavy metals in the surface sediments of the Mangonbangon River. Using UOGM, we deduced that the present heavy metal pollution in the river is caused mainly by municipal discharge and agricultural activities. Heavy metals such as Cr, Cu, and Ni are linked to municipal discharges, while Co, Mn, and Zn are attributed to agricultural and industrial activities upstream. With the more precise data on source apportionment of heavy metal pollution in the river at its earliest stage, the analytical approach and our results can guide the Department of Environment and Natural Resources-Environmental Management Bureau at Region VIII in its Mangonbangon River Water Quality Improvement Program (EMB 8 Conducts Advocacy Campaign in Mangonbangon River Communities [press release] 2019). Similarly, environmental groups can be better guided in implementing their river-clean-up drives by better addressing the root causes of the pollution (Leyte Normal U leads rehab of Tacloban's Mangonbangon River [press release]. Philippine News Agency December 19 2020 2020). The application of indigenous and industrially relevant phytoremediators in the vacant spaces and riverbanks, such as bamboo (Chua et al. 2019; Go et al. 2021), or other rooted macrophytes in sediment may help in the mitigation of the river pollution (Kumar et al. 2020b).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Ali
M. M.
,
Rahman
S.
,
Islam
M. S.
,
Rakib
M. R. J.
,
Hossen
S.
,
Rahman
M. Z.
,
Kormoker
T.
,
Idris
A. M.
&
Phoungthong
K.
2022
Distribution of heavy metals in water and sediment of an urban river in a developing country: a probabilistic risk assessment
.
Int. J. Sediment Res
. 37 (
2
),
173
187
.
Bhat
R. A.
,
Singh
D. V.
,
Qadri
H.
,
Dar
G. H.
,
Dervash
M. A.
,
Bhat
S. A.
,
Unal
B. T.
,
Ozturk
M.
,
Hakeem
K. R.
&
Yousaf
B.
2022
Vulnerability of municipal solid waste: an emerging threat to aquatic ecosystems
.
Chemosphere
287
,
132223
.
Cabuga
C.
,
Rey
Y.
&
Jumawan
J. C.
2020
Levels of heavy metals in fish and sediments from different salinity gradients of lower Agusan River to Butuan Bay, Caraga, Philippines
.
Environmentasia
13
(
2
),
88
100
.
Camacho
J.
,
Smilde
A. K.
,
Saccenti
E.
&
Westerhuis
J. A.
2020
All sparse PCA models are wrong, but some are useful. part I: computation of scores, residuals and explained variance
.
Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst.
196
,
103907
.
Chua
J.
,
Banua
J. M.
,
Arcilla
I.
,
Orbecido
A.
,
de Castro
M. E.
,
Ledesma
N.
,
Deocaris
C.
,
Madrazo
C.
&
Belo
L.
2019
Phytoremediation potential and copper uptake kinetics of Philippine bamboo species in copper contaminated substrate
.
Heliyon
5
(
9
),
e02440
.
Decena
S. C. P.
,
Arguelles
M. S.
&
Robel
L. L.
2018
Assessing heavy metal contamination in surface sediments in an Urban River in the Philippines
.
Pol. J. Environ. Stud.
27
(
5
),
1983
1995
.
de Souza Machado
A. A.
,
Spencer
K.
,
Kloas
W.
,
Toffolon
M.
&
Zarfl
C.
2016
Metal fate and effects in estuaries: a review and conceptual model for better understanding of toxicity
.
Sci. Total Environ.
541
,
268
281
.
DesMarias
T. L.
&
Costa
M.
2019
Mechanisms of chromium-induced toxicity
.
Curr. Opin. Toxicol.
14
,
1
7
.
Dexter
E.
,
Rollwagen-Bollens
G.
&
Bollens
S. M.
2018
The trouble with stress: a flexible method for the evaluation of nonmetric multidimensional scaling
.
Limnol. Oceanogr. Methods
16
(
7
),
434
443
.
Diwa
R.
,
Deocaris
C.
,
Orbecido
A.
,
Beltran
A.
,
Vallar
E.
Galvez
M. C.
&
Belo
L.
2021a
Meycauayan, an Industrial City in Bulacan, Philippines: Heavy Metal Pollution in Soil and Surface Sediments and Their Relationship to Environmental Indicators
.
Preprint
.
Diwa
R.
,
Deocaris
C.
,
Orbecido
A.
,
Beltran
A.
,
Vallar
E.
,
Galvez
M.C.
&
Belo
L.
2021a
Meycauayan, an Industrial City in Bulacan, Philippines: Heavy Metal Pollution in Soil and Surface Sediments and Their Relationship to Environmental Indicators. Preprint.
Diwa
R. R.
,
Deocaris
C. C.
,
Geraldo
L. D.
&
Belo
L. P.
2022
Modelling the Origin, Fate, and Ecological and Health Impacts of Heavy Metals from an Abandoned Mercury Mine in a Paradise Island in the Philippines
.
Preprints
.
Ebol
E. L.
,
Donoso
C. H.
,
Saura
R. B. D.
,
Ferol
R. J. C.
,
Mozar
J. R. D.
,
Bermon
A. N.
,
Manongas
J.
,
Libot
J. C. H.
,
Matabilas
C. J.
,
Jumawan
J. C.
&
Capangpangan
R. Y.
2020
Heavy metals accumulation in surface waters, bottom sediments and aquatic organisms in Lake Mainit, Philippines
.
Int. Lett. Nat. Sci.
79
,
40
49
.
EMB 8 Conducts Advocacy Campaign in Mangonbangon River Communities [press release]
.
2019
Faiz
Y.
,
Siddique
N.
&
Tufail
M.
2012
Pollution level and health risk assessment of road dust from an expressway
.
J. Environ. Sci. Health A
47
(
6
),
818
829
.
Go
J. L.
,
Madrazo
C. F.
,
Orbecido
A. H.
,
de Castro
M. E.
,
Deocaris
C. C.
&
Belo
L. P.
2021
Analysis of the copper removal kinetics of the Philippine giant bamboo (Dendrocalamus asper) in hydroponics
.
Heliyon
7
(
2
),
e06208
.
Hara
Y.
,
Ohsugi
T.
,
Tsuchiya
K.
,
Murakami
A.
&
Palijon
A. M.
2018
Post-disaster recovery linked with pre-disaster land development and damage density of Typhoon Yolanda: toward better land-use planning in Tacloban City, the Philippines
.
J. Environ. Inf. Sci.
2017
(
2
),
1
12
.
Horn
S.
,
Gunn
A. G.
,
Petavratzi
E.
,
Shaw
R. A.
,
Eilu
P.
,
Törmänen
T.
,
Bjerkgård
T.
,
Sandstad
J. S.
,
Jonsson
E.
,
Kountourelis
S.
&
Wall
F.
2021
Cobalt resources in Europe and the potential for new discoveries
.
Ore Geol. Rev
. 130, 103915.
Judson
R. S.
,
Martin
M. T.
,
Egeghy
P.
,
Gangwal
S.
,
Reif
D. M.
,
Kothiya
P.
,
Wolf
M.
,
Cathey
T.
,
Transue
T.
,
Smith
D.
&
Vail
J.
2012
Aggregating data for computational toxicology applications: the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) aggregated computational toxicology resource (ACToR) system
.
Int. J. Mol. Sci
. 13 (
2
),
1805
1831
.
Kamunda
C.
,
Mathuthu
M.
&
Madhuku
M.
2016
Health risk assessment of heavy metals in soils from Witwatersrand Gold Mining Basin, South Africa
.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
13
(
7
),
663
.
Khan
A.
,
Khan
S.
,
Khan
M. A.
,
Qamar
Z.
&
Waqas
M.
2015
The uptake and bioaccumulation of heavy metals by food plants, their effects on plants nutrients, and associated health risk: a review
.
Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int.
22
(
18
),
13772
13799
.
Kumar
V.
,
Parihar
R. D.
,
Sharma
A.
,
Bakshi
P.
,
Sidhu
G. P. S.
,
Bali
A. S.
,
Karaouzas
I.
,
Bhardwaj
R.
,
Thukral
A. K.
,
Gyasi-Agyei
Y.
&
Rodrigo-Comino
J.
2019
Global evaluation of heavy metal content in surface water bodies: a meta-analysis using heavy metal pollution indices and multivariate statistical analyses
.
Chemosphere
236
,
124364
.
Kumar
V.
,
Sharma
A.
&
Cerda
A.
2020a
Heavy Metals in the Environment: Impact, Assessment, and Remediation
.
Elsevier, Oxford
.
Kumar
V.
,
Sharma
A.
,
Pandita
S.
,
Bhardwaj
R.
,
Thukral
A. K.
&
Cerda
A.
2020b
A review of ecological risk assessment and associated health risks with heavy metals in sediment from India
.
Int. J. Sediment Res.
35
(
5
),
516
526
.
Kumar
V.
,
Pandita
S.
,
Sharma
A.
,
Sharma
V.
,
Sharma
M.
,
Cerda
A.
,
2021a
Combination of contamination indices and ecological risk assessment index for evaluation of pollution level in sediments
. In:
Heavy Metals in the Environment
(
Kumar
V.
,
Sharma
A.
&
Cerda
A.
, eds).
Elsevier
, Oxford, pp.
99
117
.
Leyte Normal U leads rehab of Tacloban's Mangonbangon River [press release]. Philippine News Agency, December 19, 2020
.
2020
Lison
D.
,
Van Den Brûle
S.
&
Van Maele-Fabry
G.
2018
Cobalt and its compounds: update on genotoxic and carcinogenic activities
.
Crit. Rev. Toxicol.
48
(
7
),
522
539
.
Marteleira
R.
,
Coelho
P. S.
&
Roxo
M. J.
2017
Water resources resilience and social perception of water scarcity in Tacloban, Philippines
. In
International Conference on Sustainable Development
. pp.
1
13
.
Means
B.
1989
Risk-assessment Guidance for Superfund. Volume 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual. Part A. Interim Report (Final)
.
Environmental Protection Agency
,
Washington, DC
,
USA
.
Office of Solid Waste and Emergency Response
.
Paronda
G.
,
David
C.
&
Apodaca
D.
2019
River flow patterns and heavy metals concentrations in Pasig River, Philippines as affected by varying seasons and astronomical tides
. In:
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
,
IOP Publishing
.
Pericherla
S.
,
Karnena
M. K.
&
Vara
S.
2020
A review on impacts of agricultural runoff on freshwater resources
.
Int. J. Emerging Technol.
11
,
829
833
.
Philippine Statistics Authority
2020
Census of Population and Housing
.
National Economic and Development Authority, Philippine Statistics Office
.
Available from: www.psa.gov.ph/population-and-housing (accessed 7 March 2022)
.
Prudente
M. S.
,
Ichihashi
H.
&
Tatsukawa
R.
1994
Heavy metal concentrations in sediments from Manila Bay, Philippines and inflowing rivers
.
Environ. Pollut.
86
(
1
),
83
88
.
Rahman
M. A.
&
Ferdous
A. A.
2011
Access to land and location of informal settlements in Tacloban City, Philippines
.
J. Sociol.
1
13
.
Santos
R. J.
2013
Yolanda and the World's Strongest Storms
.
Rappler
.
Setia
R.
,
Dhaliwal
S. S.
,
Kumar
V.
,
Singh
R.
,
Dhir
N.
,
Kukal
S. S.
&
Pateriya
B.
2021
Assessment of metal contamination in sediments of a perennial river in India using pollution indices and multivariate statistics
.
Arab. J. Geosci.
14
(
21
),
1
9
.
Turekian
K. K.
&
Wedepohl
K. H.
1961
Distribution of the elements in some major units of the earth's crust
.
Geol. Soc. Am. Bull.
72
(
2
),
175
192
.
USEPA
1989
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund. Human Health Evaluation Manual, (Part A) [R]
, Vol.
1
.
Office of emergency and remedial response
,
Washington, DC
.
[EPA/540/1-89/002]
.
US EPA
1993
Reference Dose (RfD): Description and Use in Health Risk Assessments. Background Document 1A
.
US Environmental Protection Agency
,
Washington, DC
.
US EPA
2002
Supplemental Guidance for Developing Soil Screening Levels for Superfund Sites, Appendix A – Generic SSLs for the Residential and Commercial/Industrial Scenarios
.
Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, United States Environmental Protection Agency
,
Washington, DC
,
9355
9354
.
US EPA
2011
Screening Levels (RSL) for Chemical Contaminants at Superfund Sites
.
US Environmental Protection Agency
,
Washington, DC
.

Author notes

Authors contributed equally to the paper.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).