The flow series for the River Thames near its tidal limit is one of the most studied in the world. Its length and completeness, and the richness of the historical information which augments the formal flow record, ensures that the series is of immense value. However, the variability in flood magnitude and frequency that it captures needs to be interpreted with caution. The homogeneity of the time series is influenced by a wide range of factors, including changes in the hydrometric capability of the gauging station and the impact of differing water, river and land management practices on the flow regime. Nevertheless, both the daily flow series and the record of lock levels provide some reassuring signals regarding the resilience of the Thames to fluvial flood risk in a warming world. Since routine flow measurement began in 1883, the Thames basin has seen a substantial rise in air temperature and a tendency for both winter rainfall and annual runoff to increase. There is no trend in fluvial flood magnitude however, partly reflecting a decline in snowmelt contributions to major floods and annual maximum lock levels show a significant decline, reflecting a highly sustained programme of river management.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
June 01 2012
The Thames flood series: a lack of trend in flood magnitude and a decline in maximum levels
Terry Marsh;
1Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Catherine L. Harvey
Catherine L. Harvey
1Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Maclean Building, Crowmarsh Gifford, Wallingford, Oxfordshire, OX10 8BB, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
Hydrology Research (2012) 43 (3): 203–214.
Article history
Received:
June 15 2010
Accepted:
February 24 2011
Citation
Terry Marsh, Catherine L. Harvey; The Thames flood series: a lack of trend in flood magnitude and a decline in maximum levels. Hydrology Research 1 June 2012; 43 (3): 203–214. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2012.054
Download citation file: