In setting design inflows to hydrodynamic models of flood flow along rivers, there can be a conflict between site-specific hydrological estimates of flow for a given return period and what the river model calculates as it routes flood hydrographs. This paper describes research carried out as part of the Flood Studies Update programme in Ireland, aimed at developing guidance on how to divide up river models and set the magnitude and timing of their inflows so that conditions in the model reach correspond to the expected design flood return period. A model for the joint distribution of flood peaks at pairs of catchments has been developed. The relationship between flood return periods is linked to physical differences between catchments. The model thus allows estimation of the statistical distribution of the flood return period expected at one site during a flood of specified return period elsewhere. A separate regression model predicts the relative timings of flood peaks on pairs of rivers. A summary of the resulting practitioner guidance is given, along with an overview of the testing of the method. The paper concludes with a discussion of the potential for application of the spatial dependence model to other problems in hydrology.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
May 09 2012
Setting design inflows to hydrodynamic flood models using a dependence model
Duncan Faulkner;
1JBA Consulting, South Barn, Broughton Hall, Skipton, UK
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Caroline Keef;
Caroline Keef
1JBA Consulting, South Barn, Broughton Hall, Skipton, UK
Search for other works by this author on:
John Martin
John Martin
2Office of Public Works, Jonathon Swift Street, Trim, Co. Meath, Ireland
Search for other works by this author on:
Hydrology Research (2012) 43 (5): 663–674.
Article history
Received:
January 21 2011
Accepted:
October 24 2011
Citation
Duncan Faulkner, Caroline Keef, John Martin; Setting design inflows to hydrodynamic flood models using a dependence model. Hydrology Research 1 October 2012; 43 (5): 663–674. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2012.018
Download citation file: