The effect of the time step of calibration data on the performance of a hydrological model is examined through a numerical experiment where HYMOD, a rainfall–runoff model, is calibrated with data of varying temporal resolution. A simple scaling relationship between the parameters of the model and modelling time step is derived which enables information from daily hydrological records to be used in modelling at time steps much shorter than daily. Model parameters were found to respond differently depending upon the degree of aggregation of calibration data. A loss in performance, especially in terms of the Nash–Sutcliffe measure, is evident when behavioural simulators derived with one modelling time step are used for simulation at another time step. The loss in performance is greater when parameters derived from a longer time step were used for simulating flow with a shorter time step. The application of a simple scaling relationship derived from a multi-time step model calibration significantly decreased the loss in model performance. Such an approach may offer the prospect of conducting higher temporal resolution flood frequency analysis when finer scale data for model calibration are not available or limited.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
November 22 2012
Sensitivity of the performance of a conceptual rainfall–runoff model to the temporal sampling of calibration data
Satish Bastola;
1COAPS, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL 32306, USA
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Conor Murphy
Conor Murphy
2Irish Climate Analysis and Research Units (ICARUS), Department of Geography, National University of Ireland Maynooth, Maynooth, County Kildare, Ireland
Search for other works by this author on:
Hydrology Research (2013) 44 (3): 484–494.
Article history
Received:
March 22 2012
Accepted:
April 03 2012
Citation
Satish Bastola, Conor Murphy; Sensitivity of the performance of a conceptual rainfall–runoff model to the temporal sampling of calibration data. Hydrology Research 1 June 2013; 44 (3): 484–494. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2012.061
Download citation file: