The Mateur multi-aquifer system, consisting of a Quaternary alluvial aquifer and a Campanian limestone aquifer, is one of the most significant aquifer systems in northern Tunisia, providing domestic and agricultural water supply for the entire Mateur region. The present study aims to unveil the various factors and mechanisms controlling the groundwater chemistry of such a system. Indeed, integrated hydrogeochemical and isotopic approaches are used herein to identify the alluvial and limestone aquifer waters mixing and evolution in the Mateur region. Results show that despite the difference in aquifer lithology, there is little difference in the major ion geochemistry and stable isotope ratios of groundwater within the Mateur plain. Waters from the Quaternary alluvial aquifer are classified into two predominant facies: mixed facies (Ca–Na–SO4–Cl and Ca–Na–HCO3–Cl) and Na–Cl facies. Similarly, waters from the limestone aquifer have also mixed facies (Ca–Na–SO4–Cl) and sodium chloride facies (NaCl). Groundwater δ18O and δ2H values show more homogeneous values along the groundwater flow direction, indicating inter-aquifer mixing processes. Tritium contents of the Campanian aquifer are lower than those of the Quaternary aquifer, indicating a relatively older age or mixture with recent waters. This validates a concept of the hydraulic continuity between the Quaternary aquifer and the Campanian aquifer which is consistent with the geochemical analytical results.

  • Improve the understanding of the mechanisms and factors controlling groundwater geochemical behavior from limestone aquifer and alluvial aquifer and their mixing and evolution in a multilayer aquifer system in northern Tunisia.

Graphical Abstract

Graphical Abstract
Graphical Abstract

In recent decades, the world has been facing major challenges in providing water resources for the growing population (Dai et al. 2004). Water resources have become scarcer due to climate change and the increasing demands for water for soil irrigation, domestic and industrial uses. In addition, groundwater is becoming an increasingly crucial natural resource given the exponential growth of the human population. In Tunisia, nowadays, water availability is around 450 m3/person/year. According to actual previsions, this ratio would be only 315 m3/person/year in 2030 as the number of Tunisian inhabitants is expected to reach 13 million (Ben Ahmed & Ben Rouina 2019).

The Mateur multi-aquifer system, consisting of a Quaternary alluvial aquifer and a Campanian limestone aquifer, is one of the most important aquifers in northern Tunisia as it provides domestic and agricultural water supply for the Mateur region. Nonetheless, so far no precise certainty regarding the interconnection of these aquifers has been definitely established, at least from a geochemical and isotopic point of view. Previous studies have largely focused on groundwater hydrogeochemistry of the alluvial Quaternary aquifer (Tlili-Zrelli et al. 2016), on the spatial-temporal variation of its water quality (Tlili-Zrelli et al. 2018) and on groundwater nitrate contamination (Jendoubi & Bouhlila 2001; Nasri et al. 2014).

Despite the economic importance of groundwater in Mateur plain, little is known about the groundwater geochemistry of the limestone aquifer and inter-aquifer connectivity. Therefore, a holistic research approach is necessary to better ascertain the interactions between both aquifers. To achieve such an endeavor, geochemical and isotopic approaches can be used. Groundwater geochemistry is a valuable tool to determine inter-aquifer mixing and flow regimes, which can provide insights to pursue a flexible and responsive groundwater resources management (Dogramaci & Herczeg 2002; Edmunds et al. 2003; Raiber et al. 2009; Cartwright et al. 2010).

Stable isotopes can be used as a reliable and precious tool to determine groundwater origins and study groundwater evolution couples to hydrochemical, hydrodynamic and statistical methods (Nayak et al. 2017; Cerar et al. 2018). It can offer an evaluation of physical processes affecting water masses, such as evaporation and mixing. In addition, the application of isotope-based methods has become well established for water-resource assessment, development and management in the hydrological sciences, and is an integral part of many water quality and environmental studies (Clark & Fritz 1997; Cook & Herczeg 2000). Furthermore, the deuterium excess calculated as D-excess = δ2H−8δ18O (Dansgaard 1964) has been widely used in hydrological studies.

Tritium isotope (T) is always introduced into the hydrological cycle and dated with the fallout from atmospheric nuclear weapon tests conducted mainly during the early 1960s. It can be indirectly used to evaluate the rate of groundwater circulation and renewal rate (Clark & Fritz 1997). In deep aquifers, tritium (3H) appears to be a reliable tracer of modern waters. Most of this radioactive H isotope reached the groundwater system during the period of thermonuclear bomb testing (Clark & Fritz 1997).

In general, water with 3H content of <1 TU is regarded as having a pre-1952 age, a date which represents the peak of the artificial release of tritium through nuclear (atomic bomb) tests. Such waters are characterized to have been affected by little or no secondary processes such as evaporation prior to infiltration or isotopic exchange with the aquifer materials (Mazor 1991). However, 3H concentrations above the detection limit (1 TU) indicate recent water infiltration.

The hydrogeochemical and isotopic methods are applied as powerful tools for resolving different groundwater-related problems (Appelo & Postma 2005; Ma et al. 2009), and it has been generally applied to the geochemical investigation in multilayer aquifer for Tunisia (Farid et al. 2015; Mokadem et al. 2016; Hamdi et al. 2018) and in many aquifers around the world (Stimson et al. 2001; Hofmann & Cartwright 2013; Ma et al. 2018; Keesari et al. 2021).

The overall aims of this study are (i) to identify the origin and the chemical behavior of groundwater solutes from the Quaternary alluvial and the Campanian limestone aquifers; (ii) to determine the most relevant processes which control the groundwater geochemistry for each aquifer by using geochemical and isotopic tools and (iii) to appreciate the interconnection between the two aquifer systems which contribute to groundwater management in the Mateur region.

Study area

Northern Tunisia is characterized by a Mediterranean climate which receives the largest amount of rainfall (more than 400 mm/year) and includes the main rivers in Tunisia. It has about 55% of groundwater resources from phreatic aquifers and only 18% from deep aquifers. The Mateur plain is located in the Bizerte region, in the North of Tunisia (Figure 1) and has a surface area of 260 km2 in the vast Ichkeul catchment (2,600 km2). The climate is typically Mediterranean, subhumid with a considerable variation in mean monthly temperatures. The coldest month is January, with a mean temperature of 11 °C and the hottest is August, with a mean temperature of 35.9 °C (NIM 2008). The mean annual precipitation (1998–2008) in the area is 518 mm and the mean annual evapotranspiration is 1,074 mm.
Figure 1

The study area location and geological maps (Melki et al. 2011). Sampling points are shown in black circles.

Figure 1

The study area location and geological maps (Melki et al. 2011). Sampling points are shown in black circles.

Close modal

The Mateur plain covers different stratigraphic units ranging from Triassic to Quaternary (Melki et al. 2011). The stratigraphic sequence primarily consists of carbonate formations which characterize the Tertiary deposits of the Ichkeul Mountains. The Santonian outcrops to the southwest of Mateur also form the two limestone hills of Mateur-Ras El Ain (Fournet 2001). It is made up of grey marls, with intercalations of small limestone beds.

Miocene deposits are mainly developed in the East of Mateur plain and the North of Ichkeul lake and are composed of gypsum and marl. The Quaternary and recent alluvium cover the major part of the plain and are composed of silt and detrital formations.

In order to identify the geometry and volume of the reservoir, hydrogeological synthetic sections across the Mateur plain were established by Ennabli (1967) and Melki et al. (2011), across the compilation of surface geology data, hydraulic soundings and electrical prospecting (Supplementary file, Figure 1). The Mateur aquifer is a multilayer aquifer consisting of the superposition of alluvial and limestone deposits. From a hydrogeological point of view, these aquifers are considered interconnected forming the same hydrogeological unit. The conceptual hydrogeologic model of the Mateur aquifer system (Figure 2) represented by the cross-section AA′ (Figure 1) gives an overview of the behavior of the two aquifers, suggesting their interconnection. The alluvial aquifer is made up of multilayers which are either saturated or unsaturated (Ennabli 1980). These aquifers are composed of alluvial, eolien and minor lacustrine deposits (Ennabli 1967). The main sources of the alluvial aquifer recharge are rainfall infiltration and leakage of rivers (Joumine, Tine, Sejnane, Melah and Rezala). Water loss from the aquifer is through discharge to the Ichkeul lake, evaporation and pumping for domestic and agricultural purposes (Ennabli 1967).
Figure 2

Conceptual hydrogeological model of the Mateur aquifer system (modified after Melki et al. (2011)). Cross-section AA′ as in Figure 1.

Figure 2

Conceptual hydrogeological model of the Mateur aquifer system (modified after Melki et al. (2011)). Cross-section AA′ as in Figure 1.

Close modal

The limestone aquifer is the main productive level which corresponds to Abiod Formation, dated as Campanian–Maastrichtian in age. The hydraulic characteristics of this aquifer are: a transmissivity varying from 33 to 254×10−4 m/s; a water infiltration speed in the vertical direction less than 10−7 m/s in the most unfavorable cases and greater than 5×10−7 m/s in the most favorable cases; a storage coefficient of around 8×10−2 for the limestone structures of Ras El Ain and 12.5×10−2 for those of Mateur ville; an average drainance of the order of 6×10−9.

The limestone aquifer is fed by direct infiltration of rainwater, in areas of fracture-related permeability (limestone hills), or by drainage alluvium, especially during the low water period, with a flow rate of 7 l/s. The drainage is horizontal in limestone outcrops of Mateur and Ras El Ain, and vertical between them (Ennabli 1980).

The upward and diffuse movement of the deep waters and their elimination by the superficial capillary fringe constitute the main factor of discharge of the deep limestone aquifer. This aquifer is exploited by boreholes of the National Water Supply and Distribution Company (SONEDE) to meet the region's drinking water needs (DGRE 2010). Groundwater from the alluvial aquifer is used for domestic and agricultural activities with 49 and 51%, respectively, whereas the limestone aquifer is mostly used for local domestic water supply (97.3%) owing to its good groundwater quality (DGRE 2005). Most soils in the Mateur plain are fluvisoils or hydromorphic and halomorphic soils with high salinity (Supplementary file, Figure 2) (CRDA 2007).

A geochemical and isotopic sampling campaign was conducted during September 2018. A total of 27 samples were collected from the Mateur aquifer and are distributed as follows (Figure 1):

  • - Twenty-two samples from pumping wells and boreholes exploiting the Quaternary aquifer.

  • - Five samples from boreholes exploiting the Campanian aquifer.

pH, electrical conductivity (EC), dissolved oxygen and temperature were measured in the field. The samples were kept at 4 °C for their subsequent chemical analyses. Afterwards, the samples were filtered through a 0.45 μm Millipore filter. Chloride was determined by standard AgNO3 (Rodier 1984). Sulfate (SO42−) content was measured by the gravimetric method using BaCl2. Sodium (Na+) and potassium (K+) were measured by flame photometry and calcium (Ca2+) and magnesium (Mg2+) with atomic absorption. Alkalinity was determined by titration with HCl. The quality of chemical analysis was checked by making an ionic mass balance, accepting an error rate lower than 5%. The obtained results were applied to a statistical study using Andad software (CVRM 2000). Surfer 8 (Surfer® (Golden Software, LLC)) was used to generate TDS spatial distribution map in the study area. The groundwater samples were classified into water types in the Piper diagram based on the ionic composition of different water samples, where ion concentrations are expressed in milliequivalent per liter (Piper 1944).

In order to investigate thermodynamic controls on mineral–water interactions, the geochemical computer code PHREEQC (Parkhurst & Appelo 2013) was used to calculate mineral saturation indices which were used to find out which minerals could possibly dissolve or precipitate in the aquifer system. Positive values indicate precipitation or a stable condition for minerals; zero value indicates that the solution is in equilibrium with a mineral; and negative values indicate dissolution of a mineral (Lee & Gilkes 2005).

Hydrogen and oxygen isotope analysis were performed at the Laboratory of Radio-Analysis and Environment (LRAE) of the National School of Engineers of Sfax (ENIS) using the Laser Absorption Spectrometer LGR DLT 100 (Penna et al. 2010). The results were expressed as δ (‰) relative to the international standard V-SMOW (Vienna Standard Mean Ocean Water). Twelve samples were selected for tritium content analyses using electrolytic enrichment and liquid scintillation technique (Taylor 1976). 3H concentration is expressed in Tritium Units (TU). One TU is defined as the isotope ratio 3H/1H = 10−18. Typical precisions are ±0.2, ±1.0‰ and ±0.3 TU for oxygen-18, deuterium and tritium, respectively.

Hydrochemical data

Hydrochemical characteristics of groundwater in the study area are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1

Statistical summary of hydrochemical parameters of the study area

UnitQuaternary aquifer (n = 22)
Limestone aquifer (n = 5)
MinMaxMeanSDMinMaxMeanSDa
Cl mg/l 110.05 1,956 638.95 646.97 319.50 670.95 421.81 143.13 
SO4 mg/l 146.88 2,513 1,045.22 1,484.34 293.76 773.76 524.93 212.55 
HCO3 mg/l 122.04 701.73 297.61 136.88 73.22 207.47 132.78 61.44 
Na+ mg/l 91.08 1,754.90 9.52 485.89 189.52 243.80 214.96 20.88 
Ca++ mg/l 43.20 501.00 169.74 121.44 94.40 191.00 154.76 35.95 
Mg++ mg/l 17.50 120.00 42.09 27.62 2.27 4.70 3.50 1.08 
K+ mg/l 1.56 107.11 25.62 28.41 28.38 58.75 43.70 13.54 
°C 17.90 24.50 22.92 2.11 18 22.7 20.02 2.37 
Cond ms/cm 676.00 8,930 2,056.45 1,290.38 1,832.00 2,549.00 2,008.20 305.73 
TDS mg/l 512.37 6,773.4 1,558.69 978.05 1,388.55 1,932.00 1,518.55 234.01 
pH  6.9 8.56 7.5 0.4 6.7 7.7 7.5 0.4 
UnitQuaternary aquifer (n = 22)
Limestone aquifer (n = 5)
MinMaxMeanSDMinMaxMeanSDa
Cl mg/l 110.05 1,956 638.95 646.97 319.50 670.95 421.81 143.13 
SO4 mg/l 146.88 2,513 1,045.22 1,484.34 293.76 773.76 524.93 212.55 
HCO3 mg/l 122.04 701.73 297.61 136.88 73.22 207.47 132.78 61.44 
Na+ mg/l 91.08 1,754.90 9.52 485.89 189.52 243.80 214.96 20.88 
Ca++ mg/l 43.20 501.00 169.74 121.44 94.40 191.00 154.76 35.95 
Mg++ mg/l 17.50 120.00 42.09 27.62 2.27 4.70 3.50 1.08 
K+ mg/l 1.56 107.11 25.62 28.41 28.38 58.75 43.70 13.54 
°C 17.90 24.50 22.92 2.11 18 22.7 20.02 2.37 
Cond ms/cm 676.00 8,930 2,056.45 1,290.38 1,832.00 2,549.00 2,008.20 305.73 
TDS mg/l 512.37 6,773.4 1,558.69 978.05 1,388.55 1,932.00 1,518.55 234.01 
pH  6.9 8.56 7.5 0.4 6.7 7.7 7.5 0.4 

aStandard deviation.

The temperature values of groundwater varied from 17.9 to 24.5 °C and from 18 to 20.0 °C in the alluvial and limestone aquifer, respectively.

The groundwater samples were neutral to slightly alcalin. The pH values of groundwaters varied between 6.9 and 8.6 with a mean of 7.5 in the Quaternary aquifer and between 6.7 and 7.7 with a mean of 7.5 in the limestone aquifer. In the Quaternary alluvial aquifer, EC varied considerably from 676 to 8,930 μs/cm. These values are similar to those measured by Tlili-Zrelli et al. in 2016 ranging between 540 and 8640 μs/cm (Tlili-Zrelli et al. 2016). TDS values of groundwater samples from the Quaternary aquifer varied from 512 to 6,773 mg/l with a mean of 1,558. The lowest TDS values were recorded in the northwest and southwest parts of the aquifer, which correspond to the natural recharge zone and suggest dilution effect, with an increasing trend with the flow direction (Figure 3). The highest mineralization characterizes the northeastern part of the aquifer and the south part of the Ichkeul Mountains. TDS values may be linked to the leaching of salts from the Ichkeul marshes and salty soils located in the south of Ichkeul and to weathering of gypseous formation of the Messeftine Mountain in the south east part of the aquifer (Tlili-Zrelli et al. 2016).
Figure 3

Spatial distribution map of total dissolved solids.

Figure 3

Spatial distribution map of total dissolved solids.

Close modal

The groundwater samples in the limestone aquifer are characterized by a moderate mineralization. TDS values of all groundwater samples vary between 1,518 and 1,932 mg/l and are lower than those recorded in the Quaternary alluvial aquifer. The highest TDS value is recorded in groundwater sample C1 located north of the hill of Ras El Ain, characterized by a thickening of alluvium (about 50 m thick), surmounting the limestone reservoir, which has an effect on the replenishing rate of water and consequently on the salt load. Low TDS value is recorded in the groundwater sample C5 situated near the Campanian hill of Ras El Ain, which constitutes a safe water supply area.

The sulfate contents varied between 146.9 and 5,025 mg/l and between 293.8 and 773.8 mg/l in the alluvial and in the limestone aquifers, respectively.

In groundwater samples from the Campanian limestone aquifer, we note the dominance of chlorides and sulfates among the anions with 60 and 28% of all anions, respectively. The sodium and calcium are dominant among the cations with 45 and 37% of all cations, respectively.

Despite different lithologies, groundwater from the different aquifers in the Mateur plain has similar dominance of major ions. The Piper diagram (Figure 4) shows that groundwater samples from the Quaternary alluvial aquifer are classified into two predominant facies: mixed facies (Ca–Na–SO4–Cl and Ca–Na–HCO3–Cl) and Na–Cl facies which characterizes discharge zone, well influenced by the leaching of salty deposits.
Figure 4

Plotted analyzed samples in the Piper diagram showing the geochemical facies of quaternary and Campanian waters.

Figure 4

Plotted analyzed samples in the Piper diagram showing the geochemical facies of quaternary and Campanian waters.

Close modal

Regarding the limestone aquifer, groundwater samples have a mixed facies Ca–Na–SO4–Cl to sodium chloride facies (NaCl).

Isotopic data

δ18O and δ2H

The Quaternary aquifer samples’ isotopic compositions range from –5.2 to –1.0‰ and from –31.5 to –13.4‰ for δ18O and δ2H, respectively (Table 2). Those of the Campanian aquifer vary between –5.8 and –4.9‰ for oxygen-18 and from – 36.1 to –29.7‰ for deuterium.

Table 2

Oxygen and deuterium isotopic data recorded in the Quaternary and Campanian aquifer water samples

Sampleδ18O value (permil)δ2H value (permil)Tritium activity (TU)Depth (m)
Quaternary aquifer 
Q1 −3.81 −27.01 2.06 
Q2 −4.13 −29.79 1.95 20.3 
Q3 −4.49 −29.57 – 10 
Q4 −4.71 −31.14 – 9.5 
Q5  −29.55 –  
Q6 −4.10 −23.81 –  
Q7 −4.40 −24.78  5.4 
Q8 −1.02 −13.42 3.10 5.9 
Q9 −3.56 −20.77 5.05 22.6 
Q10 −4.77 −30.20 – 6.7 
Q11 −5.17 −30.74 – 7.3 
Q12 −4.59 −30.21 3.06 8.6 
Q13 −4.71 −28.59 3.69 10.7 
Q14 −4.76 −32.40 3.69  
Q15 −3.84 −28.96 – 19.4 
Q16 −1.73 −15.63 – 7.1 
Q17 −4.90 −31.47 – 7.9 
Q18 −4.78 −29.22 – 
Q19 −4.67 −30.86 0.79 7.35 
Q20 −4.40 −26.15 – 60 
Q21 −3.76 −22.45 0.93 60 
Q22 −4.07 −24.66 4.59 45 
Campanian aquifer 
C1 −5.76 −36.10 2.7 90 
C2 −5.05 −30.38 –  
C3 −5.26 −31.84 – 73 
C4 −4.93 −29.71 1.64 57 
Sampleδ18O value (permil)δ2H value (permil)Tritium activity (TU)Depth (m)
Quaternary aquifer 
Q1 −3.81 −27.01 2.06 
Q2 −4.13 −29.79 1.95 20.3 
Q3 −4.49 −29.57 – 10 
Q4 −4.71 −31.14 – 9.5 
Q5  −29.55 –  
Q6 −4.10 −23.81 –  
Q7 −4.40 −24.78  5.4 
Q8 −1.02 −13.42 3.10 5.9 
Q9 −3.56 −20.77 5.05 22.6 
Q10 −4.77 −30.20 – 6.7 
Q11 −5.17 −30.74 – 7.3 
Q12 −4.59 −30.21 3.06 8.6 
Q13 −4.71 −28.59 3.69 10.7 
Q14 −4.76 −32.40 3.69  
Q15 −3.84 −28.96 – 19.4 
Q16 −1.73 −15.63 – 7.1 
Q17 −4.90 −31.47 – 7.9 
Q18 −4.78 −29.22 – 
Q19 −4.67 −30.86 0.79 7.35 
Q20 −4.40 −26.15 – 60 
Q21 −3.76 −22.45 0.93 60 
Q22 −4.07 −24.66 4.59 45 
Campanian aquifer 
C1 −5.76 −36.10 2.7 90 
C2 −5.05 −30.38 –  
C3 −5.26 −31.84 – 73 
C4 −4.93 −29.71 1.64 57 

Results from the investigated aquifers together with the weighted mean value for modern rainfall are shown in Figure 5 in relation to the Global Meteoric Water Line (GMWL) δ2H = 8×δ18O+10) (Craig 1961) and the Local Meteoric Water Line (LMWL) for Bizerte δ2H = 7.02×δ18O+8.27) (Ben Ammar et al. 2020).
Figure 5

Plot of δ2H (‰ vs SMOW) versus δ18O (‰ vs SMOW).

Figure 5

Plot of δ2H (‰ vs SMOW) versus δ18O (‰ vs SMOW).

Close modal

Tritium isotope

In Tunisia, tritium content in rainfall is monitored by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA 2015) at two stations (Tunis and Sfax). The annual natural 3H content for the Bizerte region was defined for the first time by Ben Ammar et al. (2020), from the Sfax chronicle, which showed a stabilization of the annual 3H signal over the period from 1992 to 2013 with an average of 3.87±0.65 TU (Ben Ammar et al. 2020).

In the study area, tritium activities range from 1.95 to 5.05 TU in the Quaternary aquifer, except for samples where tritium contents are below 1 (0.79 and 0.93, respectively), indicating a recharge prior to the era of thermonuclear bomb testing (Bajjali et al. 1997). Concerning the Campanian aquifer, tritium contents are 1.64 in groundwater sample C2 and 2.67 in groundwater sample C3.

Geochemical study

The spatial variation of temperature is linked to the water recharge and to the infiltration transfer time, which in turn both depend on porosity, lithology and thickness of the unsaturated zone (Tlili-Zrelli et al. 2018). The spatial variation is marked by a decrease as the depth increases.

In order to highlight the different mechanisms contributing to groundwater mineralization in the Quaternary aquifer and the Campanian aquifer, some plots illustrating the relations between major ions are presented (Figure 6). The linear relationship between Na+ and Cl (Figure 6(a)) shows a strong positive correlation with salinity (Figure 6(e) and 6(f)) and between both elements (Figure 6(a)). The majority of samples fall on the 1:1, (Na:Cl) line, this well-defined relationship (R2 = 0.96) and the relatively high concentrations in Na+ and Cl ions argue for the role of halite dissolution as a major process contributing to the groundwater salinization (Appelo & Postma 1993) which occurs in saline surface deposits around Ichkeul lake and salty soils. The spatial distribution maps of Na+ and Cl ions (Figure 7(a) and 7(b)) show that the lowest values are recorded in the northwest and southwest parts of the aquifer. These parts correspond to the natural recharge area (dilution effect) with an increasing trend of salinity values in the water flow direction. The high salinity levels are related to the infiltration of salty water from the Ichkeul marshes and of salty soil leachate located south of Ichkeul. The same trend is seen in Figures 3 and 7(a) and 7(b) illustrating the spatial distribution maps of TDS, Na+ and Cl and implying that Na+ and Cl contribute to the groundwater mineralization.
Figure 6

(a–f) Relationships between major ions: (a) Cl versus Na+; (b) Ca++ versus SO4; (c) HCO3 versus Ca++; (d) Mg++ versus Ca++; (e) Na+ versus TDS and (f) Cl versus TDS.

Figure 6

(a–f) Relationships between major ions: (a) Cl versus Na+; (b) Ca++ versus SO4; (c) HCO3 versus Ca++; (d) Mg++ versus Ca++; (e) Na+ versus TDS and (f) Cl versus TDS.

Close modal
Figure 7

Spatial distribution maps of (a) Na+; (b) Cl; (c) Ca2+ and (d) SO4.

Figure 7

Spatial distribution maps of (a) Na+; (b) Cl; (c) Ca2+ and (d) SO4.

Close modal
Ca2+ and SO4 concentrations are strongly correlated in the Quaternary and Campanian aquifers (Figure 6(b)), showing that sulfate would have a common origin with Ca2+ via sulfatic–calcic minerals. In the alluvial aquifer, the spatial distribution maps of Ca2+ and SO4 show that the highest values characterize the northeastern and the outflow parts of the aquifer (Figure 6(c) and 6(d)). Regarding the limestone aquifer, these values would be linked to the mixing of sulfate-rich water from the alluvial aquifer. Calcium and magnesium concentrations from the Quaternary and the Campanian aquifers are strongly correlated (Figure 6(d)). The source of Ca++ and Mg++ is likely to be mainly related to the dissolution of magnesium calcite Ca1-xMgxCO3. Groundwater samples are above line 1:1, indicating that the calcium does not come only from the dissolution of gypsum. In both Quaternary and limestone aquifers, most of groundwater samples are saturated or oversaturated with respect to calcite indicating that the dissolution of this mineral does not occur and the water–rock interaction does not contribute to carbonate ions inflow in the aquifer. However, they are undersaturated with respect to gypsum, suggesting that their soluble component Ca2+ and SO4 concentrations are not limited by mineral equilibrium and they contribute to groundwater mineralization. Such a process is obviously justified by the positive correlation between SI of sulfate minerals (gypsum) and TDS indicating the sulfate enrichment of the Quaternary aquifer from upstream to downstream (Figure 8).
Figure 8

Saturation index (SI) from calcite and gypsum plotted versus TDS.

Figure 8

Saturation index (SI) from calcite and gypsum plotted versus TDS.

Close modal

In fact, the water mineralization of the Campanian aquifer is probably not solely linked to the dissolution of calcite. This implies that another potential source of excess Ca and SO4 may be linked to the dissolution of gypsum from the alluvial aquifer. Consequently, the dominance of Ca++ and SO4 in groundwater samples from the limestone aquifer may be ascribed to vertical mixing with the shallow quaternary groundwater which led to the change of hydrochemical facies of the Campanian aquifer from Ca–HCO3 to Na–Ca–SO4–Cl.

Another hypothesis that can be formulated is that the high sulfate in deep groundwater may be linked to the dissolution of marly intercalations in Campanian limestones.

Isotopic study

The detailed analysis of stable isotope data (Figure 5) allows the distinction of two groups of waters:

  • - The first group includes water samples representing limestone aquifer and the upstream part of the Quaternary aquifer which are lying widely on the GMWL. These samples are characterized by relatively depleted oxygen-18 and deuterium contents, indicating that they are not significantly affected by evaporation, which imply rapid infiltration of rainfall waters and a low amount of evaporation.

  • - The second group comprises groundwater samples below the GMWL more enriched in δ18O and δ2H which are located for the most part in the downstream part of the Quaternary aquifer.

The enrichment in heavy isotopes is interpreted as an evaporative influence which is controlled by (i) thickness of the unsaturated zone which decreases globally from upstream to downstream part of the aquifer (Supplementary file, Figure 3), indeed, the rate of evaporation is the highest as the thickness is the lowest; (ii) the nature of the sediments of the unsaturated zone in which clay proportion also increases from upstream to downstream (Supplementary file, Figure 4), and therefore influencing the rate of infiltration and (iii) location of irrigated perimeters allowing irrigation return flow.

Furthermore, the insignificant difference between δ18O and δ2H values across the two aquifers confirms that the Mateur aquifer system is a hydrogeological entity formed by the superficial and deep levels communicating by drainage.

The importance of dissolution of evaporates (halite and gypsum) and the evaporation process is observed in the δ18O versus Cl diagram (Figure 9). It is noted that the major part of groundwater samples with high chloride concentrations are not clearly correlated with the oxygen-18 contents. This heterogeneous arrangement is mainly due to the dissolution of evaporate deposits. Nevertheless, some samples show a well-defined correlation between chloride and oxygen-18. For these samples, evaporation appears to be an important process, especially for groundwater sampled in the agricultural regions where flood irrigation is particularly used.
Figure 9

Plot of Cl versus δ18O (‰ vs SMOW).

Figure 9

Plot of Cl versus δ18O (‰ vs SMOW).

Close modal
The D-excess is used to identify secondary processes that influence the atmospheric vapor content in the evaporation–condensation cycle in nature. The D-excess plotted against δ18O shows a negative correlation for the whole set of samples (Figure 10). The decrease in D-excess is an indication that evaporation has occurred during the recharge process which again confirms the previous results. Overall, the tritium contents for the Campanian aquifer are lowest than those of the Quaternary aquifer except for 19 and 21. This indicates a relatively old age or mixture with recent waters, which confirms the hydraulic continuity between the Quaternary aquifer and the Campanian aquifer inducing the mixing of waters of the two aquifers, consistent with the geochemical analytical results.
Figure 10

D-excess versus δ18O (‰ vs SMOW).

Figure 10

D-excess versus δ18O (‰ vs SMOW).

Close modal

An attempt was made in this study to establish an improved understanding of the factors and mechanisms controlling the groundwater chemistry in Quaternary alluvial and Campanian limestone aquifers, and their mixing and evolution in the Mateur region. Hydrogeological, hydrochemical and isotope tools were used herein to identify such mechanisms.

In the Quaternary alluvial aquifer, the dominant geochemical processes influencing the groundwater mineralization are: (i) water origin (leaching of low mineralized water in the recharge zone and salt water into the discharge zone); (ii) dilution in the wet season and evaporation in the dry season; (iii) thickness, grain size and lithology of the unsaturated zone. It is noteworthy that the water–rock interaction does not contribute significantly to the solutes acquisition since minerals within the aquifer are sparingly soluble.

Regarding the Campanian limestone aquifer, groundwaters have Na–Cl or Na–Ca–Cl–SO4 facies. Such facies types indicate that groundwater mineralization from the Campanian aquifer is not under the dominant influence of the water–rock interaction; it may be linked to vertical mixing with the shallow quaternary groundwater, more enriched in sulfate. This led to a change in the hydrochemical facies of the Campanian aquifer from Ca–HCO3 to Na–Ca–SO4–Cl.

Furthermore, the δ2 H and δ18O values of groundwater from the two aquifers do not have a greater difference which confirms that the Mateur aquifer system is a hydrogeological entity formed by superficial and deep levels communicating through leakage.

The enrichment in heavy isotopes is interpreted as an evaporative influence which is controlled by (i) thickness of the unsaturated zone which decreases globally from upstream to downstream and where the evaporation rate is higher as the thickness is low; (ii) the nature of the sediments of the unsaturated zone in which clay proportion is increasing from upstream to downstream, and consequently influencing the rate of infiltration and (iii) location of irrigated perimeters allowing irrigation return flow.

The tritium contents for the Campanian aquifer are lowest than those of the Quaternary aquifer, indicating a relatively old age or mixture with recent waters. This confirms the hydraulic continuity between the Quaternary aquifer and the Campanian aquifer inducing the mixing of waters of the two aquifers. This is also consistent with the geochemical analytical results. Lastly, we believe that the present study will have significant implications for a better management of water resources in one of the most important aquifers of northern Tunisia.

The authors gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the members of the Bizerte Water Resources Division/Agriculture Ministry, for their help in the field campaign. Special thanks are due to Professor Kamel Zouari and the technical staff at the Laboratory of Radio-Analyses and Environment of the National Engineering School of Sfax (ENIS) for isotopic analyses. Finally, we wish to thank the editor and the anonymous reviewers for their insightful comments, which greatly helped to improve the paper.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Appelo
C. A. J.
&
Postma
D.
1993
Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution
.
A.A. Balkema
,
Rotterdam
, p.
536
.
Appelo
C. A. J.
&
Postma
D.
2005
Geochemistry, Groundwater and Pollution, (Second Edition) Leiden
.
A.A. Balkema
,
Rotterdam
,
The Netherlands
, p.
649
.
Ben Ahmed
C.
&
Ben Rouina
B.
2019
Tunisia: water resources’ management and sustainability of agriculture
. In:
Encyclopedia of Environmental Health
(Nriagu, J., ed.)
2nd edn,
Elsevier
,
Amsterdam
, pp.
170
184
.
Ben Ammar
S.
,
Taupinb
J. D.
,
Ben Alaya
M.
,
Zouari
K.
,
Patrisb
N.
&
Khouatmiae
M.
2020
Using geochemical and isotopic tracers to characterize groundwater dynamics and salinity sources in the Wadi Guenniche coastal plain in northern Tunisia
.
J. Arid Environ.
178
,
104
150
.
Cerar
S.
,
Mezga
K.
,
Žibret
G.
,
Urbanc
J.
&
Komac
M.
2018
Comparison of prediction methods for oxygen-18 isotope composition in shallow groundwater
.
Sci. Total Environ.
631–632
,
358
368
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.033
.
Clark
I. D.
&
Fritz
P.
1997
Environmental Isotopes in Hydrogeology
.
CRC Press/Lewis Publishers
,
New York
, p.
328
.
Cook
P.
&
Herczeg
A. L.
2000
Environmental Tracers in Subsurface Hydrology
.
Kluwer
,
New York
.
Craig
H.
1961
Isotopic variations in meteoric waters
.
Science
133
,
1702
1703
.
doi:10.1126/science.133.3465.1702
.
CRDA
2007
Commissariat régional de développement agricole
.
Bizerte, Rapp.Int
.
CVRM
2000
Programa ANDAD. Manual do utilizador
.
CVRM-Centro de Geosistemas, Instituto Superior Técnico
,
Lisboa
.
Dai
A.
,
Trenberth
K. E.
&
Qian
T.
2004
A global dataset of palmer drought severity index for 1870–2002: relationship with soil moisture and effects of surface warming
.
J. Hydrometeorol.
5
,
1117
1130
.
https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM-386.1
.
Dansgaard
W.
1964
Stable isotopes in precipitation, (ed) Tellus, Vol. 16 (4), 436–468
.
DGRE
2005
Annuaires d'exploitation des nappes phréatiques
.
Direction Générale des Ressources en Eaux
,
Tunis
.
DGRE
2010
Annuaires d'exploitation des nappes profondes
.
Direction Générale des Ressources en Eaux
,
Tunis
.
Edmunds
W. M.
,
Guendouz
A. H.
,
Mamou
A.
,
Moulla
A.
,
Shand
P.
&
Zouari
K.
2003
Groundwater evolution in the Continental Intercalaire aquifer of southern Algeria and Tunisia: trace element and isotopic indicators
.
Appl. Geochem.
18
,
805
822
.
Ennabli
M.
1967
Contribution à l’étude Hydrogélogique de la plaine de Mateur
.
Thèse
,
Faculté des sciences de Paris
,
Tunis
, p.
270
.
Ennabli
M.
1980
Etude hydrogéologique des aquifères du Nord-Est de la Tunisie pour une gestion intégrée des ressources en eau
.
Thèse de Doctorat d'Etat
,
Nice
, p.
570
.
Farid
I.
,
Zouari
K.
,
Rigane
A.
&
Beji
R.
2015
Origin of the groundwater salinity and geochemical processes in detrital and carbonate aquifers: case of Chougafiya basin (Central Tunisia)
.
J. Hydrol
.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.10.009.
Fournet
2001
Carte géologique de la Tunisie, région de Mateur, Notice explicative
.
Office National des Mines
,
Tunis
, p.
36
.
IAEA
2015
International Atomic Energy Agency, Annual Report.
.
Jendoubi
A.
&
Bouhlila
R.
2001
Modelling of Nitrate Transport in the Mateur Aquifer
.
IAHS
,
Tunisia
, p.
269
.
Keesari
T.
,
Sinha
K.
,
Saha
D.
,
Dwivedi
S. N.
,
Shukla
R. d.
&
Mohokar
H.
2021
Isotope and hydrochemical systematics of groundwater from a multi-tiered aquifer in the central parts of Indo-Gangetic Plains, India – implications for groundwater sustainability and security
.
Sci. Total Environ.
78
,
147860
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147860
.
Mazor
E.
1991
Applied Chemical and Isotopic Groundwater Hydrology
.
Open University Press
,
Buckingham
, p.
282
.
Melki
F.
,
Zouaghi
T.
,
Harraba
S.
,
Sainez
A. Z.
,
Bédir
M.
&
Zargouni
F.
2011
Structuring and evolution of Neogene transcurrent basins in the Tellian foreland domain, north-eastern Tunisia
.
J. Geodyn.
52
,
57
69
.
Mokadem
N.
,
Demdoum
A.
,
Hamed
Y.
,
Bouri
S.
,
Hadji
R.
,
Boyce
A.
,
Laouar
R.
&
Abedaziz
S.
2016
Hydrogeochemical and stable isotope data of groundwater of a multi-aquifer system: Northern Gafsa basin – Central Tunisia
.
J. Afr. Earth. Sci.
114
,
174
191
.
Nasri
N.
,
Chebil
M.
,
Guellouz
L.
,
Bouhlila
R.
,
Maslouhi
A.
&
Ibnoussina
M.
2014
Modelling non point source pollution by nitrate of soil in the Mateur plain, Northeast of Tunisia
.
Arabian J. Geosci.
8
,
1057
1075
.
Nayak
P. C.
,
Vijaya Kumar
S. V.
,
Rao
P. R. S.
&
Vijay
T.
2017
Recharge source identification using isotope analysis and groundwater flow modeling for Puri city in India
.
Appl. Water Sci.
7
,
3583
3598
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-016-0497-x
.
N.I.M.
2008
National Institute of Meteorology of Tunisia
.
Parkhurst
D. L.
&
Appelo
C. A. J.
2013
Description of Input and Examples for PHREEQC Version 3: A Computer Program for Speciation, Batch-Reaction, One-Dimensional Transport, and Inverse Geochemical Calculations (No. 6-A43). US Geological Survey. https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6A43
.
Penna
D.
,
Stenni
B.
,
Wrede
S.
,
Bogaard
T. A.
,
Gobbi
A.
,
Borga
M.
,
Fische
B. M. C.
,
Bonazza
M.
&
Charova
Z.
2010
On the reproducibility and repeatability of laser absorption spectroscopy measurements for δ2H and δ18O isotopic analysis
.
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
7
,
2975
3014
.
Raiber
M.
,
Webb
J. A.
&
Bennetts
D. A.
2009
Strontium isotopes as tracers to delineate aquifer interactions and the influence of rainfall in the basalt plains of southeastern Australia
.
J. Hydrol.
367
,
188
199
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.12.020
.
Rodier
J.
1984
L'analyse de l'eau: eaux naturelles, eaux résiduaires, eaux de mer
(
Rodier, J.
, ed.).
Dunod
,
Paris
, p.
1135
.
Stimson
J.
,
Frape
S.
,
Drimmie
R.
&
Rudolph
D.
2001
Isotopic and geochemical evidence of regional-scale anisotropy and interconnectivity of an alluvial fan system, Cochabamba valley, Bolivia
.
Appl. Geochem.
16
,
1097
1114
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-2927(01)00019-1
.
Surfer® (Golden Software, LLC) P.O. Box 28, Golden, CO 80402-0281, USA. Available from: www.goldensoftware.com.
Taylor
C. B.
1976
IAEA Isotope Hydrology Laboratory
.
International Atomic Energy Agency. Technical Procedure Note No. 19
,
Vienna
.
Tlili-Zrelli
B.
,
Gueddari
M.
,
Bouhlila
R.
&
Oueslati
M. N.
2016
Groundwater hydrogeochemistry of Mateur alluvial aquifer (Northern Tunisia)
.
J. Hydrogeol. Hydrol. Eng
.
doi:10.4172/2325-9647.1000128
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution for non-commercial purposes with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Supplementary data