The uneven distribution, scarcity, and pollution of water resources can significantly hinder socioeconomic development. A conceptual framework of Water Resources Endowment-Efficiency-Pressure-Response-Structure-Cycle (2EPRSC) was proposed, and 16 indicators were selected to establish the evaluation index system. Taking the five economic zones in the Sichuan Province of China as the research area, the genetic algorithm optimized entropy weighting method-cloud model was applied to determine the water security grades. Subsequently, the coupling coordination degree (CCD) model was established based on water security system (WSS)-SES to analyze the CCD. The results showed that (1) temperature and investment were the two indicators with more significant impacts on water security in Sichuan Province. (2) From 2012 to 2022, water security in Sichuan Province as a whole presented a decreasing and then increasing trend. (3) From 2012 to 2022, CCDs of the WSS-SES in Sichuan Province's economic zones were mostly at moderate imbalance, with the Chengdu Plain economic zone showing the highest CCD. Overall, the CCD scores across the economic zones were on an ascending trajectory. The study, grounded in the state of water security and CCD in Sichuan, can forge a scientific foundation for the sustainable development of WSS-SES.

  • Water security and water security system (WSS)-SES coupling coordination degree (CCD) are assessed from the perspective of economic zones. New ideas for the related research are provided.

  • Water cycle is considered in water security assessment frameworks.

  • Optimization of weights was done by genetic algorithm optimized entropy weighting method.

  • The WSS-SES CCD was analyzed on the basis of a water security study.

Water resources are essential for daily life and industrial activities, and they govern the health of the ecological environment (Bao & Chen 2015). As cities grow, efficiency in water use (Zhang et al. 2021), wastewater management (Alcantara et al. 2020), and the quality of drinking water (Ferrero et al. 2018) are emerging as key factors that can impede the region's sustainable development. Conducting water security research is conducive to actively responding to water resource pressures and challenges. It aids in enhancing equitable distribution and sustainable water management practices, aligning with the national principles of green development (Lu et al. 2023). Sichuan Province is rich in water resources, with water playing a vital role in irrigation, water supply, and power generation economic activities. However, due to the influence of topography and landscape, water infrastructure is lacking in certain regions, leading to regional and seasonal water shortages that pose problems for both the government and local residents (Zhu et al. 2009). The western Sichuan plateau boasts an abundance of water resources, yet it has a lower population density and a less-developed economic status compared with the more developed cities in central and eastern Sichuan. Figure 1 reveals the difference between per capita water resources and per capita GDP in each administrative region of Sichuan Province. The mismatch between water resources supply and social development demand is still relatively prominent. It is crucial to oversee and enhance the management level. China, too, grapples with this imbalance between resource availability and developmental needs (Wang et al. 2019; Xia et al. 2023). In recent years, focusing on the development of the Chengdu-Chongqing economic zone and the Yangtze River Economic Belt as part of national strategies, Sichuan Province has increasingly emphasized regional integration and sustainable development, with a particular focus on the consolidation of regional resources. The government has divided Sichuan Province into five economic zones based on regional characteristics and formulated their respective integration development plans. Building on this foundation, this article examined the economic zones from their respective vantage points, enabling a comparative analysis of the level of integrated water security development across each zone. In addition, there are obvious differences between the economic zones in various aspects, such as the level of economic development, resource endowment, and population size, and the diversity of research objects makes it possible to delve deeper into the complexity characteristics of water security. In summary, the study of water security (WS) in Sichuan Province holds considerable practical significance for sustainable development, and it can also serve as a valuable reference for enhancing water security initiatives in other regions.
Figure 1

Per capita water resources and GDP in Sichuan, 2022.

Figure 1

Per capita water resources and GDP in Sichuan, 2022.

Close modal

The United Nations has developed a specific definition of ‘water security’ that includes elements of safe water use and ecological protection, and has since closely linked it to the sustainable development goals. This fully demonstrates the critical importance of water security in achieving the long-term development in the region (UN water 2013; United Nations 2015). However, a uniform theory regarding water security has yet to be established (Butte et al. 2022). Studies on water security typically revolve around themes such as water pollution and availability, human vulnerability to drought and flood, and the sustainability of resources and water ecosystems (Cook & Bakker 2012; Chang & Zhu 2020). Previous studies indicate that water security not only emphasizes the availability of water but also incorporates environmental protection and sustainable development considerations. Therefore, water security was hereby defined as the availability of ample water resources at a reasonable cost, highlighting the critical role of efficient water use and the practice of water recycling.

Assessments of water security have given rise to diverse frameworks and indicators based on varying needs, with research scales encompassing countries worldwide (Panella 2021; Kchouk et al. 2022), islands or basins (Alexandra & Rickards 2021; Hasan & Ridwan 2021), river basins (Nkiaka et al. 2022; Pacheco et al. 2022), and provinces or cities (Lu et al. 2021; Deng et al. 2022). Since the dawn of the 21st century, quantitative studies have been conducted on water security from multiple dimensions. Data sources for evaluation indicators fall into two categories, i.e., survey data obtained through interviews based on empirical scales, and public data provided by governments based on resource metrics. Assessment methods primarily involve establishing evaluation models for water security, including the pressure-state-response (PSR) conceptual model (Van Ginkel et al. 2018; Ghosh et al. 2019), the driving-pressure-state-impact-response (DPSIR) model (Cao et al. 2022), and variations of the DPSIR model incorporating carrying capacity (Zhang et al. 2019). The concept of water security is evolving with the ongoing research. Accurately assessing urban water security is fundamentally dependent on the development of an objective and reliable set of indicators. Differences in understanding of water security make it difficult to harmonize assessment indicator systems. However, most existing indicator systems include both natural and socioeconomic attributes. Currently, integrated evaluation tools involved in water security research include analytic hierarchy process (AHP) and technique for order of preference by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) (Nie et al. 2018) and other multicriteria decision-making techniques. In addition, grey relational analysis (Li et al. 2020), cloud matter element model (Deng et al. 2022), fuzzy comprehensive evaluation (FCE) (Ding et al. 2017; Cai et al. 2020), and projection pursuit method (Wang et al. 2020) are also extensively used. However, these methodologies necessitate highly precise data to bolster the selection of evaluative indicators, inherently posing certain limitations. Furthermore, noncomprehensive evaluative methodologies, such as system dynamics (SD) (Sahin et al. 2017; Yin et al. 2020), water footprint (WF) (Veettil et al. 2022), and other nonintegrated evaluation methods, have been frequently employed. The SD and WF methods focus on the explanation of the interaction mechanisms of the systems and the evolutionary process. Table 1 presents a detailed comparison of several major research methods.

Table 1

Summary of water security research methods

AuthorsMethodStudy area (research scale)ProcessFeatures
Aboelnga et al. (2020)  AHP Madaba, Jordan (City) Constructed water security assessment framework added climate change and water hazards, using linear weighting to quantify water security. The method has broad applicability, but it requires extensive comparisons and calculations when there are a large number of alternatives for decision-making. 
Nie et al. (2018)  TOPSIS Industrial region (City) The indicator framework was constructed from four dimensions: water resources, society, economy, and environment. The alternatives were ranked by extended fuzzy TOPSIS. Traditional TOPSIS uses precise crisp number to assess alternative, but fuzzy TOPSIS can model qualitative data well with different fuzzy sets. 
Cai et al. (2020)  Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation Hunan, China (Province) The indicator system was construction of socioeconomic, food and ecological aspects, and the evaluation method was the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is capable of handling uncertain information through the fuzzy sets. However, it has drawbacks such as relying on subjective judgment, utilizing complex models, and requiring extensive data. 
Veettil et al. (2022)  WF The Big Dry Creek Watershed (Watershed) Based on the concept of water footprint, the AgES model was employed to quantify blue, green, and gray water footprint indicators. Attention is given to the distribution of various water footprints, and water consumption and return flows are considered. However, it is not possible to distinguish between water security categories in different areas. 
Yin et al. (2020)  SD Guizhou, China (Province) Target systems and subsystems were identified, scenario parameters were set, and model system dynamics were established to simulate future water security trends under different scenarios. Objective quantification of internal relationships between the structure and function of various complex systems. However, choosing parameter indicators can be challenging, and the simulation model's relative certainty lags behind the system's dynamic changes. 
AuthorsMethodStudy area (research scale)ProcessFeatures
Aboelnga et al. (2020)  AHP Madaba, Jordan (City) Constructed water security assessment framework added climate change and water hazards, using linear weighting to quantify water security. The method has broad applicability, but it requires extensive comparisons and calculations when there are a large number of alternatives for decision-making. 
Nie et al. (2018)  TOPSIS Industrial region (City) The indicator framework was constructed from four dimensions: water resources, society, economy, and environment. The alternatives were ranked by extended fuzzy TOPSIS. Traditional TOPSIS uses precise crisp number to assess alternative, but fuzzy TOPSIS can model qualitative data well with different fuzzy sets. 
Cai et al. (2020)  Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation Hunan, China (Province) The indicator system was construction of socioeconomic, food and ecological aspects, and the evaluation method was the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation is capable of handling uncertain information through the fuzzy sets. However, it has drawbacks such as relying on subjective judgment, utilizing complex models, and requiring extensive data. 
Veettil et al. (2022)  WF The Big Dry Creek Watershed (Watershed) Based on the concept of water footprint, the AgES model was employed to quantify blue, green, and gray water footprint indicators. Attention is given to the distribution of various water footprints, and water consumption and return flows are considered. However, it is not possible to distinguish between water security categories in different areas. 
Yin et al. (2020)  SD Guizhou, China (Province) Target systems and subsystems were identified, scenario parameters were set, and model system dynamics were established to simulate future water security trends under different scenarios. Objective quantification of internal relationships between the structure and function of various complex systems. However, choosing parameter indicators can be challenging, and the simulation model's relative certainty lags behind the system's dynamic changes. 

Table 1 presents a comparative analysis of literature on water security evaluation. The evaluation covers various aspects, and a variety of scales are involved. However, there are some shortcomings in the research for areas with uneven distribution of water resources. The evaluation methods have their own advantages and disadvantages. In comprehensive evaluation, those that account for the randomness and uncertainty inherent in the evaluation process offer considerable benefits (Liu et al. 2022b). Currently, the most widely used methods based on fuzzy mathematics for evaluating water security are the FCE method and the cloud model. To ensure objective evaluation and accurate differentiation of the results when dealing with numerous evaluation indicators, a cloud model was hereby selected for water security evaluation. This model has been widely applied in many fields such as comprehensive evaluation, intelligent control, decision analysis, and prediction (Jiao et al. 2020; Liu & Zhu 2022; Zeng et al. 2023). Among them, comprehensive assessment includes security system resilience assessment, resource and environmental carrying capacity assessment, engineering construction risk assessment, and water quality assessment (Guo et al. 2020; Li et al. 2021; Ruan et al. 2021; Yang et al. 2023). Therefore, on the basis of establishing the evaluation framework, the cloud model was adopted to conduct a comprehensive evaluation of water security in this study.

Water security is intrinsically linked to the socioeconomic development context (Grasham et al. 2019). The rational exploitation and utilization of natural resources and sustainable socioeconomic development are interdependent and mutually restrictive. Research on water security evaluation and coupled coordination degree can provide suggestions for promoting coordinated development among systems (Deng et al. 2022). Conversely, promoting high-quality economic growth and long-term sustainability is vital to reducing water risk and ensuring water security (Hoekstra et al. 2018). At present, there is a scarcity of studies that explore the interplay between water security and socioeconomic development, particularly those that assess urban water security and categorize developmental stages. The coupling coordination degree (CCD) model has been employed in various fields of research, reflecting the variation characteristics and interactive relationships across systems (Xu & Hou 2019). Many scholars have utilized the model to analyze the water resources system in conjunction with other systems (Li et al. 2016; Cui et al. 2019; Liu et al. 2022a). For instance, Liu et al. (2020) established an improved CCD model for investigating the social economy – water environmental quality coupling coordination conditions of the Nansi Lake Basin from 2001 to 2017, while analyzing the dynamic evolution mechanism.

Rationale of the study and objectives

In general, the current research on water security exhibits the following characteristics and limitations. First, theoretical frameworks for water security are increasingly emphasizing ‘sustainable development’ (Chang & Zhu 2020). Therefore, water security assessments should prioritize sustainable water supply and include the rational development and recycling of water resources. This ensures that the assessments accurately reflect the healthy operation of the water cycle within natural and social systems. Second, the existing research primarily focuses on watersheds or cities (Wang et al. 2017; Zhou et al. 2019), with specific objects such as economic zones rarely explored. Third, the coupled and coordinated development of water security and socioeconomics is less considered in water security research. Furthermore, the prevailing research on coupled coordination has inherent limitations, particularly in the absence of comparative studies examining how each system's synergistic development varies across regions with diverse socioeconomic development levels. Finally, most of the current studies solely analyze the temporal trend of water security (Cao et al. 2022) and neglect to investigate its developmental variability from a spatial standpoint. This oversight disregards the impact of the spatial structural imbalance phenomenon on sustainable development.

Considering the gaps in prior research, this study was conducted primarily to address the following three questions: First, what are the spatiotemporal dynamics of water security in Sichuan's five economic zones from a sustainable development perspective? Second, what are the key factors impacting water security in these zones? Third, what are the spatiotemporal patterns and differences in the CCD of water security system (WSS)-SES across the five zones, especially considering their varying socioeconomic statuses? To this end, the 2EPRSC water security evaluation index system was constructed based on the PSR theoretical framework, considering water utilization efficiency and water cycle, and the genetic algorithm (GA) optimized entropy weighting method (GA-IEWM)-cloud model was employed to explore the spatiotemporal heterogeneity of the water security and to delve into its influencing factors. In addition, the CCD model was utilized to analyze the synergistic development of WSS-SES in combination with the SES evaluation index system.

Compared with existing studies, the main research objectives and contributions of this study could be listed as follows. First, economic zones were selected as a specific research object, focusing on the differences in the level of integration of regions. From the perspective of sustainable development, it aimed to explore the reasons for the differences in the overall WS and CCD of the economic zones, providing new ideas for related research. Second, the concept of WS was combined with the theory of sustainable development, with a particular focus on water recycling. A new theoretical framework 2EPRSC was built, covering water resources endowment, water resources pressure, water resources response, water resources efficiency, water resources utilization structure, and water resources cycle, comprehensively reflecting the support capacity of water resources systems and water security. Third, the GA-IEWM algorithm was innovatively introduced to refine the entropy weighting method (EWM) by integrating a planning model and solving it with a GA. This approach not only objectively determines indicator weights but also enhances and diversifies them, leading to more precise outcomes. Fourth, WSS and SES were combined on the basis of evaluating the WS level using the cloud model, CCD was calculated, the coordination degree between the level of water security integration and the level of socioeconomic integration was analyzed, and the reasons affecting the sustainable and coordinated development of the two systems were explored.

This article is organized as follows: Section 1 mainly introduces the research progress of the water security evaluation. Section 2 presents the research framework and the research ideas of this paper. Section 3 establishes the comprehensive water security evaluation model based on the GA-IEWM-cloud model, TOPSIS, FCE, and the WSS-SES CCD evaluation model. Section 4 exhibits the results of the study including the spatiotemporal variation characteristics of water security and CCD in the five economic zones of Sichuan. Section 5 presents the conclusions drawn from the study, while Section 6 offers a discussion of the findings.

This article was performed to quantify the spatiotemporal differences in water security and CCD in Sichuan by extracting evaluation indicators, analyzing factors influencing water security, and calculating the CCD of WSS-SES in the five economic zones. On this basis, targeted suggestions were proposed to improve the current state of water security in Sichuan and to enhance the level of sustainable development of WSS-SES. The research framework is shown in Figure 2, with specific steps outlined as follows:
Figure 2

Research framework of this article: (a) evaluation framework and (b) evaluation procedure.

Figure 2

Research framework of this article: (a) evaluation framework and (b) evaluation procedure.

Close modal

Step 1. From the perspective of sustainable development, indicators were extracted pertaining to water resources endowment, pressure, response, efficiency, structure, and cycle. A comprehensive water security evaluation framework, dubbed the 2EPRSC, was thus constructed, reflecting the rational development, effective utilization, and recycling of water resources.

Step 2. Based on the GA-IEWM model, the weights of indicators were calculated, and key factors impacting water security were investigated. Subsequently, the cloud model was employed to divide the water security grades of the five economic zones in Sichuan and analyze their temporal and spatial variation characteristics in water security. The TOPSIS and FCE were employed to verify the reliability of the cloud model.

Step 3. By integrating socioeconomic development evaluation indicators, the CCD model was adopted to study the spatiotemporal distribution differences of WSS-SES in the five economic zones. This could serve as a crucial reference for reference water resource allocation and investment, realizing the sustainable and coordinated development of WSS-SES and bridging the development gap between economic zones.

Study area

Sichuan Province (, ) is located in the southwest of China, covering a total area of . Despite the abundance of rivers, the spatial distribution of water resources is highly uneven due to the varied topography, resulting in acute water shortages in some regions. According to pertinent planning documents and previous studies (Guo et al. 2022), the 21 cities of Sichuan could be divided into the following five economic zones, as shown in Figure 3. Each economic zone has its own characteristics. Chengdu Plain and South Sichuan Economic Zones boast a high proportion of the total economic output, making significant contributions to the economic growth of Sichuan. Northeast Sichuan Economic Zone adjacent to Shanxi Province and Chongqing plays a pivotal role as a transportation hub. Panxi Economic Zone is abundant in mineral resources and water energy resources. Northwest Sichuan Eco-Economic Zone focuses on protecting ecological barriers and developing tourism. To this end, the five economic zones in Sichuan are ideal objects to study the development differences of WSS-SES CCD between regions.
Figure 3

Geographical location of the five economic zones in Sichuan.

Figure 3

Geographical location of the five economic zones in Sichuan.

Close modal

Evaluation indicator construction

Abundant water resources and secure water environment provide material foundations and significant assurance for socioeconomic development. However, water resources consumption and environmental pollution caused by socioeconomic development could pose pressures on water security. The coordinated development of water security and social economy holds much significance for the long-term sustainability. Figure 4 shows the mutual feedback relationships among water security, society, and economy.
Figure 4

Mutual feedback relationship between water security, society, and economy.

Figure 4

Mutual feedback relationship between water security, society, and economy.

Close modal

To combat water security challenges, including pollution, and to devise more rational water resource allocation plans for sustainable regional development, this article synthesized existing research findings and tailored them to the study area's specific conditions. A comprehensive water security evaluation framework was developed, spanning six key aspects: (1) water resources endowment (E): regional natural water conditions and the supply capacity ensuring normal human living and production; (2) water resources pressure (P): the consumption and environmental burden on regional water resources caused by human activities; (3) water resources response (R): the intensity of measures taken to improve regional water security; (4) water resources efficiency (E): the efficient utilization of water resources, reflecting technological advances; (5) water resources structure (S): the rationality of regional water resources development and utilization; and (6) water resources cycle (C): limiting effluent discharge and promoting closed-loop water use to reduce resource waste and environmental stress. A total of 16 indicators were extracted, as shown in Table 2.

Table 2

The 2EPRSC evaluation framework of water security

System layerCriterion layerIndicator layerNo.TypeReferences
WSS Endowment Average annual rainfall (mm)  Deng et al. (2022)  
Water resources per unit area (104 m3/km2 
Pressure Per capita water consumption (m3/person)  − Zhang et al. (2019)  
Per capita domestic water consumption (m3/person)  − 
Average annual temperature (°C)  − 
Response Environmental protection investment intensity (%)  Cao et al. (2022)  
Green coverage (%)  
Proportion of ecological water (%)  
Efficiency Water consumption per 10-thousand-yuan GDP (m3 /10-thousand-Yuan)  − Du et al. (2022)  
Water consumption per 10-thousand-yuan agricultural value added (m3 /10-thousand-Yuan)  − 
Water consumption per 10-thousand-yuan industrial value added (m3 /10-thousand-Yuan)  − 
Structure Proportion of surface water supply (%)  Qiao et al. (2022)  
Proportion of groundwater supply (%)  − 
Degree of water resources development (%)  − 
Cycle Wastewater discharge per 10-thousand-yuan GDP (m3/10-thousand-Yuan)  − Chang & Zhu (2020)  
Rate of wastewater treatment (%)  
System layerCriterion layerIndicator layerNo.TypeReferences
WSS Endowment Average annual rainfall (mm)  Deng et al. (2022)  
Water resources per unit area (104 m3/km2 
Pressure Per capita water consumption (m3/person)  − Zhang et al. (2019)  
Per capita domestic water consumption (m3/person)  − 
Average annual temperature (°C)  − 
Response Environmental protection investment intensity (%)  Cao et al. (2022)  
Green coverage (%)  
Proportion of ecological water (%)  
Efficiency Water consumption per 10-thousand-yuan GDP (m3 /10-thousand-Yuan)  − Du et al. (2022)  
Water consumption per 10-thousand-yuan agricultural value added (m3 /10-thousand-Yuan)  − 
Water consumption per 10-thousand-yuan industrial value added (m3 /10-thousand-Yuan)  − 
Structure Proportion of surface water supply (%)  Qiao et al. (2022)  
Proportion of groundwater supply (%)  − 
Degree of water resources development (%)  − 
Cycle Wastewater discharge per 10-thousand-yuan GDP (m3/10-thousand-Yuan)  − Chang & Zhu (2020)  
Rate of wastewater treatment (%)  

In total, eight indicators were extracted to assess the level of socioeconomic development, as shown in Table 3. (1) Population density reflects the degree of regional development. An increased urbanization rate further propels societal progress. Employment stands as the foremost concern for the populace and is of paramount importance to overall societal production and development. (2) Proportion of expenditure to GDP reflects the Government's focus on regional developments. A well-structured industry significantly boosts regional economic development and production levels. Per capita GDP, total retail sales of consumer goods and the proportion of science and technology investment together provide an accurate depiction of the region's economic status.

Table 3

Evaluation indicators of SES

System layerCriterion layerIndicator layerNo.TypeReferences
SES Social development Population density (person/km2 − Zhang et al. (2022)  
Urbanization rate (%)  
Employment rate (%)  
Economic level Proportion of expenditure to GDP (%)  Zhang et al. (2019)  
Industrial structure upgrading coefficient  
Per capita GDP (Yuan/person)  
Total retail sales of consumer goods (100 million yuan)  
Ratio of research and experimental development to GDP (%)  
System layerCriterion layerIndicator layerNo.TypeReferences
SES Social development Population density (person/km2 − Zhang et al. (2022)  
Urbanization rate (%)  
Employment rate (%)  
Economic level Proportion of expenditure to GDP (%)  Zhang et al. (2019)  
Industrial structure upgrading coefficient  
Per capita GDP (Yuan/person)  
Total retail sales of consumer goods (100 million yuan)  
Ratio of research and experimental development to GDP (%)  

Data source

Combining the actual development and utilization of water resources in Sichuan Province and the availability of data, this article comprehensively collected 24 indicators of water resources, meteorology, ecological environment, and socio-economy in Sichuan Province from 2012 to 2022. These indicators were utilized to evaluate the urban water security and study the coupled and coordinated development of water security and socioeconomics in various economic zones. The meteorological data were generated from day-by-day data processing of surface climate data released by the ‘China Meteorological Data Service Centre (https://data.cma.cn/)’. The initial water resources data were sourced from The Sichuan Province Water Resources Bulletin (http://slt.sc.gov.cn/scsslt/szy/szy.shtml), while the ecological environment and socioeconomic initial data were extracted from The Sichuan Statistical Yearbook (http://tjj.sc.gov.cn/scstjj/c105855/nj.shtml).

Herein, the GA-IEWM was employed to calculate the weight of indicators, and the water security grade was then assessed using the cloud model, thereby identifying the spatiotemporal variation characteristics of water security in different economic zones of Sichuan. Further, using the CCD model, the CCD development trend of WSS-SES was analyzed, providing reference information for improving water security and enhancing the coordination degree of water security and socioeconomic development.

GA-IEWM-cloud model comprehensive evaluation method

EWM is an objective method to calculate the weights of indicators. It reflects the discrete degree of indicator data according to the information entropy of indicators and accurately calculates the weights. The specific calculation steps of EWM are detailed by Zhang & Dong (2022). In this study, leveraging the foundational concept of EWM's information entropy, a planning model was devised to maximize the variance in indicator information entropy across different periods. Concurrently, the solution process aimed to minimize the overall information entropy of the indicators. GA was employed to solve the planning model and to obtain the optimized indicator weights. Furthermore, the cloud model, by facilitating the mutual mapping between qualitative and quantitative aspects, could mirror the actual state of the evaluation subject. It embodied the characteristics of ambiguity and randomness, offering significant advantages in comprehensive assessments (Liu et al. 2022b). Therefore, the GA-IEWM-cloud model was constructed for comprehensively evaluating the water security level. The specific algorithm flow is shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5

Algorithm flowchart of the GA-IEWM-cloud model.

Figure 5

Algorithm flowchart of the GA-IEWM-cloud model.

Close modal

Improved entropy weight method using GA solving (GA-IEWM)

The GA-IEWM algorithm solves the optimal indicator weights on the basis of the information entropy idea of the EWM algorithm. First, the original information matrix Y was established based on the assessment object i () and evaluation index (). To eliminate the influence of the scale, the matrix X was standardized by :

For positive indicators:
(1)
For negative indicators:
(2)
where is the standardized value of object i with respect to indicator j. and are the maximum and minimum values of indicator j, respectively.
EWM takes the standardized matrix as the assessment value for weight calculation, while this article adopts the way of assigning weights to the standardized matrix to improve EWM, so that the weight , and obtains the assessment matrix containing the weights of the indicators as follows:
(3)
where, denotes the assessed value of object i in year t (), and each year is assessed for five economic zones, so .
Calculate the information entropy:
(4)
(4)
(6)
where represents the information entropy of the evaluation value in the year t, and represents the proportion of object i. Based on the aforementioned calculation process of information entropy in IEWM, a planning model is established, as shown below. This model is about evaluation indicator weight:
(7)

Herein, GA was employed to solve the aforementioned planning model, and the detailed steps are as follows:

Step 1: The number of iterative steps of GA was set to be >1,000, the population size was 300, the range of indicator weights as independent variables was 0–1, and the initialized population was generated by coding;

Step 2: The fitness value of individual population was calculated according to the fitness function. The fitness function is as follows:
(8)

The fitness function consisted of two parts: the former was the objective function, while the latter was the penalty function. The penalty function was utilized to restrict the independent variable, ensuring was as close to 0 as possible from 1, fulfilling the first constraint of the planning model. The fitness function aimed to increase the difference in information entropy between different years and to enhance the penalty function's effectiveness.

Step 3: Selection, crossover, and mutation operations were performed on the population to generate a new population.

Step 4: It was judged whether the termination condition was satisfied. If not, return to Step 2; if so, output the optimal weights w.

Due to the constraint altering the total weight from being equal to 1, the final indicator weights were derived through a normalization process. The normalization formula is given as follows: .

The size of information entropy reflected the degree of discrete indicator data – the greater the degree of discrete, the smaller the information entropy. The GA maximized the difference in information entropy of indicators in different years, while making the degree of dispersion between the assessment values obtained after weighting the normalized values larger, minimizing the information entropy of the overall indicators. The significance of increasing the overall degree of dispersion was to increase the gap between the assessment objects, facilitating subsequent classification.

Normal cloud model

The overall properties of the cloud model are characterized by three characteristic parameters (expectation , entropy , hyper entropy ). indicates the center position of the cloud droplet distribution in the domain, is a measure of the fuzziness of the qualitative concepts, and reflects the degree of cloud dispersion (Yu et al. 2023). The evaluation criteria are the basis for calculating the characteristic parameters of the cloud model. In this article, we refer to the water use quotas issued by the Sichuan Provincial People's Government (https://www.sc.gov.cn/), the ‘14th Five-Year Plan’ for water security, and other relevant documents, as well as to the classification criteria of the existing research literature on water security (Deng et al. 2022; Qiao et al. 2022), and the evaluation criteria of the cloud model were hereby employed to calculate the characteristics of the cloud model, serving as the basis for the calculation of the parameters. In addition, the water security was categorized into five levels: safer, safe, critical safe, unsafe, and extremely unsafe, with the upper and lower boundaries of the intervals corresponding to the upper and lower thresholds of each level, as summarized in Table 4.

Table 4

Range of water security indicator classifications

IndicatorsVariablesUnitⅠ (safer)Ⅱ (safe)Ⅲ (critical safe)Ⅳ (unsafe)Ⅴ (extremely unsafe)
Average annual rainfall  mm >1300 [1100,1300] [1000,1100] [900,1000] <900 
Water resources per unit area  104 m3/km2 >65 [55,65] [45,55] [35,45] <35 
Per capita water consumption  m3/person <230 [230,250] [250,300] [300,400] >400 
Per capita domestic water consumption  m3/person <43.8 [43.8,54.8] [54.8,59.8] [59.8,73] >73 
Average annual temperature  °C <12 [12,14] [14,15] [15,16] >16 
Environmental protection investment intensity  >3.6 [2.8,3.6] [2.3,2.8] [2,2.3] <2 
Green coverage  >45 [40,45] [38,40] [35,38] <35 
Proportion of ecological water  >3 [2,3] [1.5,2] [1,1.5] <1 
Water consumption per 10-thousand-yuan GDP  m3 /10- thousand-Yuan <55 [55,70] [70,85] [85,100] >100 
Water consumption per 10-thousand-yuan agricultural value added  m3 /10- thousand-Yuan <220 [220,250] [250,350] [350,500] >500 
Water consumption per 10-thousand-yuan industrial value added  m3 /10- thousand-Yuan <13 [13,25] [25,35] [30,45] >45 
Proportion of surface water supply  >95 [90,95] [85,90] [80,85] <80 
Proportion of groundwater supply  <5 [5,10] [10,15] [15,20] >20 
Degree of water resources development  <5 [5,10] [10,15] [15,20] >20 
Wastewater discharge per 10-thousand-yuan GDP  m3 /10- thousand-Yuan <1.5 [1.5,3.5] [3.5,4.5] [4.5,5.5] >5.5 
Rate of wastewater treatment  >95 [85,95] [80,85] [75,80] <75 
IndicatorsVariablesUnitⅠ (safer)Ⅱ (safe)Ⅲ (critical safe)Ⅳ (unsafe)Ⅴ (extremely unsafe)
Average annual rainfall  mm >1300 [1100,1300] [1000,1100] [900,1000] <900 
Water resources per unit area  104 m3/km2 >65 [55,65] [45,55] [35,45] <35 
Per capita water consumption  m3/person <230 [230,250] [250,300] [300,400] >400 
Per capita domestic water consumption  m3/person <43.8 [43.8,54.8] [54.8,59.8] [59.8,73] >73 
Average annual temperature  °C <12 [12,14] [14,15] [15,16] >16 
Environmental protection investment intensity  >3.6 [2.8,3.6] [2.3,2.8] [2,2.3] <2 
Green coverage  >45 [40,45] [38,40] [35,38] <35 
Proportion of ecological water  >3 [2,3] [1.5,2] [1,1.5] <1 
Water consumption per 10-thousand-yuan GDP  m3 /10- thousand-Yuan <55 [55,70] [70,85] [85,100] >100 
Water consumption per 10-thousand-yuan agricultural value added  m3 /10- thousand-Yuan <220 [220,250] [250,350] [350,500] >500 
Water consumption per 10-thousand-yuan industrial value added  m3 /10- thousand-Yuan <13 [13,25] [25,35] [30,45] >45 
Proportion of surface water supply  >95 [90,95] [85,90] [80,85] <80 
Proportion of groundwater supply  <5 [5,10] [10,15] [15,20] >20 
Degree of water resources development  <5 [5,10] [10,15] [15,20] >20 
Wastewater discharge per 10-thousand-yuan GDP  m3 /10- thousand-Yuan <1.5 [1.5,3.5] [3.5,4.5] [4.5,5.5] >5.5 
Rate of wastewater treatment  >95 [85,95] [80,85] [75,80] <75 

According to the categorization criteria in Table 4, the normal cloud model was used in this study to calculate the characteristic parameters:
(9)
(10)
where and represent the upper and lower thresholds of indicator i corresponding to evaluation level j, respectively. is a constant, which generally ranges from 0.001 to 0.1 (Guo et al. 2020; He & Ruan 2022). It is used to represent the thickness of the cloud: the larger is, the larger the thickness of the cloud is, and the higher the uncertainty of the model is. This article adopts the research method of Deng et al. (2022) to determine the magnitude of . The specific results of the cloud parameters (, , ) are shown in Table 5.
Table 5

The cloud parameters (, , ) of water security evaluation standard

VariablesⅠ (safer)Ⅱ (safe)Ⅲ (critical safe)Ⅳ (unsafe)Ⅴ (extremely unsafe)
 (2109.51, 687.48, 70) (1200, 84.93, 8) (1050, 42.46, 5) (950, 42.46, 5) (804.04, 81.5, 8) 
 (83.84, 16, 1) (60, 4.25, 0.5) (50, 4.25, 0.5) (40, 4.25, 0.5) (30, 4.25, 0.5) 
 (209.51, 17.4, 1) (240, 8.49, 0.5) (275, 21.23, 1) (350, 42.46, 5) (486.11, 73.13, 5) 
 (36.46, 6.23, 0.5) (49.3, 4.67, 0.5) (57.3, 2.12, 0.1) (66.4, 5.61, 0.5) (82.45, 8.03, 0.8) 
 (8.82, 2.7, 0.1) (13, 0.85, 0.1) (14.5, 0.42, 0.05) (15.5, 0.42, 0.05) (16.85, 0.72, 0.05) 
 (4.28, 0.58, 0.05) (3.2, 0.34, 0.01) (2.55, 0.21, 0.01) (2.15, 0.13, 0.01) (1.88, 0.1, 0.01) 
 (46.01, 0.86, 0.1) (42.5, 2.12, 0.1) (39, 0.85, 0.1) (36.5, 1.27, 0.1) (22.17, 10.9, 1) 
 (3.39, 0.33, 0.01) (2.5, 0.42, 0.01) (1.75, 0.21, 0.01) (1.25, 0.21, 0.01) (0.59, 0.35, 0.01) 
 (47.12, 6.69, 0.5) (62.5, 6.37, 0.5) (77.5, 6.37, 0.5) (92.5, 6.37, 0.5) (149.21, 41.79, 5) 
 (200.79, 16.32, 1) (235, 12.74, 1) (300, 42.46, 5) (425, 63.69, 5) (684.3, 156.51, 10) 
 (10.43, 2.18, 0.1) (19, 5.1, 0.5) (30, 4.25, 0.5) (40, 4.25, 0.5) (58.24, 11.24, 1) 
 (97.23, 1.89, 0.1) (92.5, 2.12, 0.1) (87.5, 2.12, 0.1) (82.5, 2.12, 0.1) (77.5, 2.12, 0.1) 
 (2.69, 1.96, 0.1) (7.5, 2.12, 0.1) (12.5, 2.12, 0.1) (17.5, 2.12, 0.1) (22.5, 2.12, 0.1) 
 (2.68, 1.97,0.1) (7.5, 2.12, 0.1) (12.5, 2.12, 0.1) (17.5, 2.12, 0.1) (26.9, 5.86, 0.5) 
 (1.17, 0.28, 0.01) (2.5, 0.85, 0.1) (4, 0.42, 0.05) (5, 0.42, 0.05) (6.5, 0.85, 0.1) 
 (96.38, 1.17, 0.1) (90, 4.25, 0.5) (82.5, 2.12, 0.1) (77.5, 2.12, 0.1) (71.5, 2.97, 0.1) 
VariablesⅠ (safer)Ⅱ (safe)Ⅲ (critical safe)Ⅳ (unsafe)Ⅴ (extremely unsafe)
 (2109.51, 687.48, 70) (1200, 84.93, 8) (1050, 42.46, 5) (950, 42.46, 5) (804.04, 81.5, 8) 
 (83.84, 16, 1) (60, 4.25, 0.5) (50, 4.25, 0.5) (40, 4.25, 0.5) (30, 4.25, 0.5) 
 (209.51, 17.4, 1) (240, 8.49, 0.5) (275, 21.23, 1) (350, 42.46, 5) (486.11, 73.13, 5) 
 (36.46, 6.23, 0.5) (49.3, 4.67, 0.5) (57.3, 2.12, 0.1) (66.4, 5.61, 0.5) (82.45, 8.03, 0.8) 
 (8.82, 2.7, 0.1) (13, 0.85, 0.1) (14.5, 0.42, 0.05) (15.5, 0.42, 0.05) (16.85, 0.72, 0.05) 
 (4.28, 0.58, 0.05) (3.2, 0.34, 0.01) (2.55, 0.21, 0.01) (2.15, 0.13, 0.01) (1.88, 0.1, 0.01) 
 (46.01, 0.86, 0.1) (42.5, 2.12, 0.1) (39, 0.85, 0.1) (36.5, 1.27, 0.1) (22.17, 10.9, 1) 
 (3.39, 0.33, 0.01) (2.5, 0.42, 0.01) (1.75, 0.21, 0.01) (1.25, 0.21, 0.01) (0.59, 0.35, 0.01) 
 (47.12, 6.69, 0.5) (62.5, 6.37, 0.5) (77.5, 6.37, 0.5) (92.5, 6.37, 0.5) (149.21, 41.79, 5) 
 (200.79, 16.32, 1) (235, 12.74, 1) (300, 42.46, 5) (425, 63.69, 5) (684.3, 156.51, 10) 
 (10.43, 2.18, 0.1) (19, 5.1, 0.5) (30, 4.25, 0.5) (40, 4.25, 0.5) (58.24, 11.24, 1) 
 (97.23, 1.89, 0.1) (92.5, 2.12, 0.1) (87.5, 2.12, 0.1) (82.5, 2.12, 0.1) (77.5, 2.12, 0.1) 
 (2.69, 1.96, 0.1) (7.5, 2.12, 0.1) (12.5, 2.12, 0.1) (17.5, 2.12, 0.1) (22.5, 2.12, 0.1) 
 (2.68, 1.97,0.1) (7.5, 2.12, 0.1) (12.5, 2.12, 0.1) (17.5, 2.12, 0.1) (26.9, 5.86, 0.5) 
 (1.17, 0.28, 0.01) (2.5, 0.85, 0.1) (4, 0.42, 0.05) (5, 0.42, 0.05) (6.5, 0.85, 0.1) 
 (96.38, 1.17, 0.1) (90, 4.25, 0.5) (82.5, 2.12, 0.1) (77.5, 2.12, 0.1) (71.5, 2.97, 0.1) 
The forward cloud generator is used to calculate the membership degree of the evaluation indicator to different evaluation levels:
(11)
where represents the membership degree, x is the actual value of each index, and is the normally distributed random number generated according to normal distribution (, ). The cloud generator is run 1,000 times to obtain the average value and derive the membership matrix Z. The fuzzy subset B of the comment domain is calculated by fuzzy transformation of W and Z, and W represents the weight coefficient set determined by GA-IEWM.
(12)

Finally, the water security grade of each economic zone is judged according to the principle of maximum membership degree.

TOPSIS and fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

To ascertain the cloud model's dependability, it was compared with TOPSIS and FCEs, as per the analysis presented in Table 1. Leveraging the index weights derived from the GA-IEWM, both methods were utilized to calculate the overall water security scores, which were then used to assign grades based on the scores. TOPSIS and FCEs were extensively used in the comprehensive evaluation of water security and related fields of research. TOPSIS was utilized to construct the positive ideal solution and the negative ideal solution according to the sample data, and to determine the goodness of the solution by the distance between the solution and the ideal solution. The calculation process was relatively objective. Both the FCE and the cloud model considered the inherent uncertainty in classifying indicators.

TOPSIS

The following model is established to measure the degree of proximity of the water security evaluation object to the ideal solution, and the proximity is used to express the comprehensive score of the evaluation objects:
(13)
where is the composite score of object i, and and are the positive and negative ideal solutions, respectively. The calculation steps are detailed by Zhang & Dong (2022). The higher the value of , the closer it is to the positive ideal solution and the better the degree of water security. The composite scores corresponding to different water security grades can be calculated according to the grade classification thresholds of each indicator.

Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation

The specific operational procedures for determining the water security grade by FCE are as follows:

Step 1: Establish the assessment indicator set according to the assessment object and the water security evaluation indicator system. Adopt the indicator weight set determined by GA-IEWM. Determine the evaluation set according to the indicator grade classification standard (Table 4).

Step 2: Calculate the FCE matrix. The formula is as follows:
(14)
where and R is the fuzzy affiliation matrix of U to V.
Step 3: Set the evaluation scores corresponding to water security grades Ⅰ–V as , , , , and , respectively, and the water security status indicated by grades Ⅰ–V ranges from excellent to worse, so the corresponding evaluation scores range from high to low (Wang et al. 2022). Calculate the final score of the program:
(15)
where and S represents the FCE results, and the larger the value, the better the water security status. The FCE scores corresponding to the water security grades are shown in Table 6.
Table 6

Comprehensive score intervals corresponding to water security grades

Grades Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ 
Scores 0.8–1.0 0.6–0.8 0.4–0.6 0.2–0.4 0–0.2 
Grades Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅴ 
Scores 0.8–1.0 0.6–0.8 0.4–0.6 0.2–0.4 0–0.2 

Evaluation model of coupling coordination degree

The WSS and the socioeconomic system can be regarded as two independent and coupled systems. With the concept of coupling (Sun et al. 2024), the following CCD model is constructed as follows:
(16)
where D denotes the CCD of the two systems, and the specific operation steps of C and T are detailed by Wu et al. (2023).

According to Zhang & Dong (2022), D ranges from 0 to 1, and grades are classified into two types: imbalance and coordination, based on the coupling coordination scores with a total of five stages, as shown in Table 7.

Table 7

Classification criteria of coupling coordination degree (Zhang & Dong 2022)

Coupling coordination degreeCoupling coordination gradeDevelopmental meaning
 Serious imbalance Imbalance WSS and SES are widely different and not synchronized in their development. 
 Moderate imbalance 
 Primary coordination Coordination WSS and SES work well together and develop harmoniously. 
 Intermediate coordination 
 Excellent coordination 
Coupling coordination degreeCoupling coordination gradeDevelopmental meaning
 Serious imbalance Imbalance WSS and SES are widely different and not synchronized in their development. 
 Moderate imbalance 
 Primary coordination Coordination WSS and SES work well together and develop harmoniously. 
 Intermediate coordination 
 Excellent coordination 

Weighting results

EWM calculates the weight values according to the dispersion degree between the indicators. Herein, the GA-IEWM algorithm was adopted, where the GA algorithm could optimize the weights by increasing the dispersion degree between the information entropy of different years. In this article, the raw data of 24 indicators were first standardized, and then the weights of water security and socioeconomic indicators were calculated separately. Moreover, the GA-IEWM was compared with the traditional EWM algorithm. The results are shown in Figure 6.
Figure 6

Comparison of GA-IEWM and EWM weighting results.

Figure 6

Comparison of GA-IEWM and EWM weighting results.

Close modal

As illustrated in Figure 6, the weight distribution of the indicators calculated by EWM is more uniform, with the weight scores of WSS and SES ranging from 0.0398 to 0.1051 and 0.0807 to 0.1938, respectively. In contrast, the gap in the weights of the indicators is more pronounced after increasing the sensitivity of each indicator to the model using the GA-IEWM method. The optimized weight scores for WSS and SES range from 0.0163 to 0.1666 and 0.1230 to 0.1733, respectively. The combination of the raw data from the indicators reveals that the weights of the indicators with minor discrepancies between the data have been diminished to varying degrees, for instance, X9-X15 in the WSS and S2, S3, S5, and S6 in the SES. Despite these indicators exhibiting some disparities between regions, the alterations are not as pronounced from 1 year to the next. GA introduces more variability into the overall assessment values across different years when solving the IEWM. This means that it amplifies the differences in overall water security over time. The method focuses more on how much the changes in indicator values in various periods contribute to the overall improvement in water security levels. It also, to some extent, diminishes the impact of regional variability. As a result, the weights of the indicators determined by GA-IEWM are more in line with practical needs.

The weights of each criterion layer of water security can be obtained from the indicator weights calculated by GA-IEWM, as shown in Figure 7.
Figure 7

Results of GA-IEWM weights for water security evaluation indicators: (a) weights of the criterion layer and (b) weights of the indicator layer.

Figure 7

Results of GA-IEWM weights for water security evaluation indicators: (a) weights of the criterion layer and (b) weights of the indicator layer.

Close modal

As shown in Figure 7, in the 2EPRSC water security evaluation framework, the importance of the criterion layer is ranked as response (25.66%), pressure (24.48%), endowment (17.37%), cycle (12.63%), structure (12.33%), and efficiency (7.52%). The weight of response is mainly influenced by two indicators, environmental protection investment intensity (X6) and proportion of ecological water (X8), whose weights are 12.28 and 9.30%, respectively. The importance of pressure is obviously determined by average annual temperature (X5), which has a high weight of 16.66%. The two indicators included in endowment, average annual rainfall (X1) and per capita water consumption (X2) have weights of 10.84 and 6.53%, respectively. The rate of wastewater treatment (X16) also plays an important role with a weight of 6.84%. As evidenced by the indicator weighting values, climate change exerts a profound influence on regional water security, particularly in terms of rainfall and temperature. As the average temperature rises, there is an increased likelihood of droughts and water shortages, which will intensify the conflict between water supply and demand. Concurrently, the reduction in water quantity within the basin will also give rise to more significant pollution issues and threaten the security of the water environment. Consequently, it is imperative that efficacious measures be implemented without delay to address the mounting pressure on water resources resulting from climate change and socioeconomic growth.

Water security evaluation results

In this article, combining the index weights determined by GA-IEWM, water security was assessed using cloud modeling, TOPSIS, and FCE. The outcomes were compared to validate the effectiveness of the cloud model. The cloud model determined the water security grade of each economic zone according to the principle of maximum affiliation, and TOPSIS compared the scores of the assessment object with the scores of each level to obtain the water security grade of the assessment object. The FCE was divided into grades by the fuzzy comprehensive score. The division criteria are shown in Table 5. The water security grades of five economic zones in Sichuan Province from 2012 to 2022 were calculated by the cloud model, TOPSIS, and FCE, as shown in Table 8.

Table 8

Results of water security evaluation grades

YearsCloud model
TOPSIS
FCE
E1E2E3E4E5E1E2E3E4E5E1E2E3E4E5
2012 Ⅱ Ⅴ Ⅱ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ 
2013 Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ 
2014 Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅰ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ 
2015 Ⅳ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅳ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ 
2016 Ⅱ Ⅴ Ⅱ Ⅰ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ 
2017 Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅰ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ 
2018 Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ 
2019 Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅰ Ⅳ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ 
2020 Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅰ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ 
2021 Ⅰ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅰ Ⅳ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ 
2022 Ⅱ Ⅳ Ⅳ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅰ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ 
YearsCloud model
TOPSIS
FCE
E1E2E3E4E5E1E2E3E4E5E1E2E3E4E5
2012 Ⅱ Ⅴ Ⅱ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ 
2013 Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ 
2014 Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅰ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ 
2015 Ⅳ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅳ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ 
2016 Ⅱ Ⅴ Ⅱ Ⅰ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ 
2017 Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅰ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ 
2018 Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ 
2019 Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅰ Ⅳ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅳ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ 
2020 Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅰ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ 
2021 Ⅰ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅰ Ⅳ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅱ 
2022 Ⅱ Ⅳ Ⅳ Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅲ Ⅰ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅲ Ⅱ Ⅱ Ⅲ 

In Table 8, E1–E5 corresponded to Chengdu Plain Economic Zone, Northeast Sichuan Economic Zone, South Sichuan Economic Zone, Northwest Sichuan Ecological Economic Zone, and Panxi Economic Zone, respectively. As shown in Table 8, the cloud model and the results of TOPSIS and FCE could correspond to each other in terms of the excellent performance of water security. The polarization of the grades judged by the cloud model was a little more obvious. The Northwest Sichuan Ecological and Economic Zone (E4) stood out from TOPSIS, with the cloud model predominantly categorizing it as rank Ⅰ, attributed to its abundant water resources, low population density, and significantly lower development and per capita water use compared to other economic zones. Moreover, as a key area for ecological protection in Sichuan Province, the intensity of environmental protection investment was high. Therefore, it was concluded that the evaluation results of the cloud model were reasonable. The water security grades determined by the FCE were mainly concentrated in II and III, with high fuzziness, making it difficult to distinguish the performance differences between different years and regions. The cloud model could determine the size of He through the distribution of cloud droplets in different grades of the indicator, thus adjusting the uncertainty of the grading criteria. Besides, it could be better divided into grades Ⅰ–V. TOPSIS provided a more objective approach to evaluating results based on classification criteria. However, the inherent uncertainty in grading criteria introduced a level of uncertainty to the results. Thus, the objective and absolute division characteristic of TOPSIS might not be always entirely applicable (Deng et al. 2022). Overall, the cloud model took into account the uncertainty of grading compared to TOPSIS and did not have the high ambiguity of FCE. Therefore, it was confirmed that the cloud model could be more effective in comprehensively evaluating water security.

According to the evaluation results of the cloud model, the spatial distribution of water security grades in Sichuan Province from 2012 to 2022 was plotted, as shown in Figure 8.
Figure 8

Spatial distribution of water security grades in the five economic zones, 2012–2022.

Figure 8

Spatial distribution of water security grades in the five economic zones, 2012–2022.

Close modal

Table 8 and Figure 8 uncovered that the overall level of water security in the five economic zones of Sichuan Province exhibited a fluctuating trend, initially deteriorating and then improving between 2012 and 2021. From 2012 to 2016, the swift economic expansion and population growth intensified the strain on water resources. However, the water resource management system was still under development, and water-saving technologies were not widely adopted. As a result, the efficiency of water resource utilization in both agriculture and industry did not see significant improvement. In 2015–2016, the regions of Chengdu and Northeast Sichuan faced significant challenges due to the overexploitation of water resources. The water resource endowment of the Northeast Sichuan Economic Zone was even slightly worse than in previous years, which was the main reason for its Grade V. In 2016–2021, the state of water Security continued to improve. However, the water security status saw a downturn in 2022. This was largely due to an unusually severe drought in Sichuan. The water stress in cities such as Neijiang and Zigong in southern Sichuan, and Nanchong and Guangyuan in northeastern Sichuan, was further exacerbated by the local topography, complicating the acquisition of external water resources.

From the perspective of the spatial distribution of the water security level, the uneven distribution of water resources led to significant differences in the water security status of each region. For 11 years, the Northwest Sichuan Ecological Economic Zone consistently achieved top-tier water security. However, the plateau terrain posed challenges to the development and utilization of these water resources. The next was Chengdu Plain Economic Zone, where the water security level was basically between Critical Safe (Ⅲ) and Safer (Ⅰ). The zone contained the center of gravity of Sichuan's socioeconomic development, with developed industries and high water consumption, yet with a high level of water conservation. The region's economic growth was dynamic and innovative, with the development of the Chengdu-Chongqing Twin Cities Economic Circle creating numerous new opportunities for advancement. At the same time, it was also necessary to note that the rapid development of the city would bring the problem of overdevelopment of water in Minjiang and Tuojiang river basins, exacerbating the contradiction between supply and demand of water resources and putting pressure on water security.

The overall water security level of the South Sichuan Economic Zone and the Panxi Economic Zone was not high, mainly Critical Safe (Ⅲ) and Safe (Ⅱ). However, the overall state of water security in both economic zones exhibited greater stability. The main change in the Panxi Economic Zone was that agricultural and industrial water use efficiency was improved to some extent. In recent years, more attention has been paid to promoting the green transformation of industries, facilitating the improvement of industrial water use efficiency. The South Sichuan Economic Zone is affected by topography and resources, and the problem of unbalanced internal development is more prominent. Yibin and Luzhou, two southern cities, enjoy abundant water resources and boast advanced water infrastructure and transportation systems. However, in Zigong and Neijiang City, water scarcity and severe early water pollution in the Tuojiang River Basin have been significantly alleviated through the government's ongoing efforts in water environment management, leading to substantial improvements in water quality. As a result, the overall level of water security in southern Sichuan has also been raised from Class III to Class II or even Class I.

Overall, after 11 years of development, the government has made important efforts to improve water use efficiency and water environment management, etc. With the implementation of water conservation policies and the completion and commissioning of numerous reservoirs and water transfer projects, the water pollution problem has been well controlled, the contradiction between the supply and demand of water resources has been regulated, and the internal cooperation and integrated development of the economic zones has been strengthened. In addition, it is worth pondering that the benefits of resolving regional water shortages through water transfer methods, particularly the construction of large-scale water transfer projects, like the Dadu-Minjiang water diversion project, will take a considerable amount of time to materialize. Therefore, the government is also highly attentive to improving the modern management level of water resources, safeguarding regional water security through implementing water-saving policies, protecting the water environment, and similar initiatives.

WSS-SES CCD analysis

WSS and SES have a stable and long-term relationship of mutual influence and interaction between the two systems. Water security facilitates high-quality economic development, and economic development positively drives water security. Herein, based on the CCD model, the respective comprehensive scores of WSS and SES as well as the CCD between the two systems were calculated. The average score trend in Sichuan is shown in Figure 9.
Figure 9

Average CCD and average comprehensive index of each system, 2012–2022.

Figure 9

Average CCD and average comprehensive index of each system, 2012–2022.

Close modal
As shown in Figure 9, from 2012 to 2022, mainly affected by the fluctuation of the average composite index of WSS, the CCD of WSS-SES in Sichuan Province exhibited the state of rising, then falling, and then rising again, and the CCD value was at the interval of [0.32,0.35], which was on the verge of the dislocation state stage. According to Table 5, the WSS and SES were not synchronized with each other's development and were in the stage of friction and adaptation, necessitating further adjustment. In 2015, the WSS composite score was the lowest, with the previous cloud model of the calculation of the WS results, equivalent to the cloud model from another perspective to reflect the reliability of the cloud model. The WSS average composite index was higher than the SES average composite index, indicating that the overall level of development of the WSS in Sichuan Province was more advanced and could support the reasonable development of the socioeconomic development. The WSS composite index during 2012–2014 was significantly higher than SES. After 2015, the gap between SES composite score and WSS was narrowed. As socioeconomic development accelerated, the SES composite score was steadily rising. Concurrently, through government initiatives, the WSS also saw enhancements, with both systems advancing in tandem and mutually reinforcing one another. The average score of the CCD in 2022 increased by 9.38% compared with that in 2015. Meanwhile, the spatial change of CCD of WSS-SES in 2012–2022 for the five economic zones is shown in Figure 10. Notably, the high and low bar graphs reflected the comparison between the values in the same year.
Figure 10

Spatial distribution of CCD in the five economic zones, 2012–2022.

Figure 10

Spatial distribution of CCD in the five economic zones, 2012–2022.

Close modal

As shown in Figure 10, the overall CCD of the five economic zones in Sichuan Province presented a positive trend from 2012 to 2022, and the differences between the regions were gradually narrowing. From 2012 to 2022, the CCD values of the five economic zones in Sichuan Province were distributed in the range of 0.2833–0.4111, in the intervals of [0.2,0.4] and [0.4,0.6], respectively. Besides, they were on the verge of dislocation and basic coordination state, and the coordination effect was general. Among them, the Chengdu Plain Economic Zone demonstrated primary coordination, with CCD scores surpassing other zones and achieving a moderate coordination level in 2020. The regional differences in the coupled coordination of WSS-SES were closely related to the regional water security situation and the level of socioeconomic development. The economic zones with the most obvious differences in WSS and SES within these 11 years were the Chengdu Plain Economic Zone and the Northwest Sichuan Ecological Economic Zone. The Chengdu Plain, as the center of economic development in Sichuan Province, exhibited a much higher SES composite score compared to the other economic zones. Its SES composite score was also significantly higher than the WSS composite score, involving problems such as water scarcity and excessive WSS loading limiting economic development. On the contrary, despite its good resource endowment, the Northwest Sichuan Economic Zone, situated in a plateau region with a vast and sparse population, had a lower socioeconomic development level, resulting in a significantly higher WSS system composite score compared to its SES score. From the coupling of these two economic zones, it could be found that the mismatch between water security and the level of socioeconomic development in Sichuan Province was more prominent. Therefore, on the one hand, it was necessary to increase the trans-regional and trans-basin water transfer and develop the economy according to local conditions. On the other hand, in plateau areas with poorly developed infrastructure, necessary efforts should also be made to strengthen water conservancy construction, give full play to the role of water resources, and improve the intra-regional water supply capacity.

The development of the CCD of each economy from 2012 to 2022 indicated that the CCD of the five economic zones was improved to different degrees, with small fluctuations in some years, and also with their own development characteristics. The CCD of the Northwest Sichuan Ecological Economic Zone was maintained at the middle level of the province, and the region experienced fluctuations in CCD and overall improvement in its efforts to balance the relationship between environmental protection and socioeconomic development. The CCD of Chengdu Plain Economic Zone was at the highest level in the province, and the CCD was gradually improving, giving full play to the positive socioeconomic role. Especially in 2016, despite widespread poor water security across the province, the Chengdu Plain maintained a better state due to its higher SES composite score. The Northeast Sichuan Economic Zone gradually improved from the lowest level in 2012 to a medium level, and the CCD score enhanced by 12.35% in 2022 compared to 2012. In addition, the South Sichuan Economic Zone followed a similar trend, but with a less pronounced degree of change. West Panxi Economic Zone developed more slowly, with the CCD perennially at the lowest level in the province. However, it began to change for the better in 2018 and maintained at a stable level, with the transformation of old industrial bases and industrial restructuring and transformation leading to improvements in environmental quality, water security, and comprehensive socioeconomic levels. In recent years, the government has paid increasing attention to the synergistic development of the region, and cities within the economic zone have been cooperating more closely with each other to form complementary industries and continuously promote the optimization of the industrial structure. Through joint construction and sharing, the optimal allocation of resources in the region as a whole is enhanced, thus improving overall competitiveness.

This study was conducted to establish an indicator system based on water security and sustainable socioeconomic development, taking five economic zones with different characteristics in Sichuan Province as the research object. The weights of each indicator were calculated through GA-IEWM, and the key factors affecting the state of water security were analyzed. On this basis, a cloud model was adopted to comprehensively evaluate water security for the period of 2012–2022, which was also combined with the existing methodology for cloud model validation. Finally, the coupled coordination model was employed to calculate the CCD of WSS-SES in Sichuan Province. By analyzing the temporal and spatial trends of water security and CCD, corresponding suggestions were proposed to improve the water security status and promote the coordinated development of water security and social economy. The specific conclusions are as follows:

  • (1) In 2012–2022, precipitation and temperature were the key factors influencing water security. The application of the GA-EWM method reduced the influence of less discernible indicators and increased variability in indicator weight values.

  • (2) The water security results calculated by the cloud model could correspond to the results calculated by the existing commonly used methods. In addition, the evaluation could be refined for enhanced accuracy, offering distinct advantages for a comprehensive assessment of water security. From 2012 to 2022, the water security across Sichuan Province's five economic zones exhibited variation, with an overall trend of initial decline followed by an increase.

  • (3) Most of the CCDs of WSS-SES in the economic zones of Sichuan Province in 2012–2022 were on the verge of dislocation, and the average WSS development level of the province was slightly higher than that of the SES development level. Development differences were substantial among the five zones, with a positive overall trend. Water security lagged notably behind socioeconomic growth in West Sichuan and the Chengdu Plain.

Economic growth and population expansion are escalating, heightening reliance on water resources. Overexploitation in certain regions has compounded river stress and exacerbated water pollution (Alcantara et al. 2020; Shu et al. 2024). (1) As people's awareness of water conservation increases, the sustainable use of natural resources has received increasing attention. However, the existing water security evaluation index system inadequately addresses water resource recycling capacity, limiting its applicability to contemporary water security assessments (Chang & Zhu 2020). In addition, water security and socioeconomic development interact with each other, but most of the current studies only analyze the trend of water security index, a single score, failing to reflect the coordinated development of water security and socio-economy. The present study differed by incorporating sustainable development and water cycle dynamics into the proposed framework. Herein, not only the spatial and temporal distribution characteristics of water security in Sichuan Province were obtained but also the development of the CCD of water security and socioeconomic system was also analyzed. (2) While previous scholars have also paid attention to economic zones as research objects, most of the studies have only chosen one economic zone for research and analyzed the situation of each unit in the economic zone, still essentially a study of cities (Chen & Xu 2021). In contrast, the purpose of this article was to explore the differences in the level of integration and development of economic zones, facilitating a comprehensive understanding of each zone's status. It closely matched the multiple core tenets of the national and local governments' strategies on regional integration and high-quality development, reflecting a positive response to current development needs. (3) The complexity of the research object in this article ensured that the methodologies and perspectives adopted exhibited strong generalization value. The Sichuan Basin, from the southeast to the northwest, has the topographical complexity from plains, hills to plateaus, and the climatic complexity from humid to arid. It also includes the complexity of the socioeconomic environment with Chengdu as the center and the differentiated development of each region. The five economic zones divided by the government include all the cities in Sichuan Province, and each economic zone has its own characteristics and development orientation. Consequently, the study's focus on five economic zones in Sichuan Province was indicative. The research outcomes, enriched by a comprehensive context, had significant reference value for water security development in analogous regions and in individual cities. In addition, the 2EPRSC framework established in this article based on the existing theoretical PSR took into account the sustainability of water resources and contained indicators that were widely adopted by scholars in related fields (Qiao et al. 2022). The research methodology of this article was also validated by existing models, and both the theoretical framework and assessment methodology could be generalized and applied to other regions or even a larger scope of research.

Future research can focus on the following areas:

(1) Sichuan is abundant in rivers, with varying levels of development and utilization of its major waterways. Investigating water security from the perspectives of river basins, regions, and other multidimensional angles can lead to a more optimized allocation of water resources, thereby offering more practical guidance for policy proposals. (2) Water security encompasses a broad spectrum of issues. Research in this area should not merely amalgamate water security with social, economic, and ecological elements but should also delve into the interlinked vulnerabilities and risks across different systems.

All authors mentioned in the article agreed to authorship and gave their consent to the submission of the manuscript.

All authors whose names appear on the submission approved the version to be published.

This work was supported by Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2023NSFSC0807), Opening Fund of Sichuan Mineral Resources Research Center (SCKCZY2022-YB017, SCKCZY2022-YB018) and the General Program of Sichuan Center for Disaster Economy Research (ZHJJ2022-YB002).

Data cannot be made publicly available; readers should contact the corresponding author for details.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Alcantara
R.
,
Alcantara
M.
,
Chinelli
C. K.
,
Dias
F. C.
,
Mariano
R.
,
Longo
O. C.
&
Soares
C.
2020
The main drivers to face the challenges of increasing the intelligence of sanitary sewage systems in Brazilian cities
.
Water
12
,
3478
.
Alexandra
J.
&
Rickards
L.
2021
The contested politics of drought, water security and climate adaptation in Australia's Murray-darling basin
.
Water Alternatives
14
(
3
),
773
794
.
Butte
G.
,
Solano-Correa
Y. T.
,
Peppa
M. V.
,
Ruíz-Ordóñez
D. M.
,
Maysels
R.
,
Tuqan
N.
,
Polaine
X.
,
Montoya-Pachongo
C.
,
Walsh
C.
&
Curtis
T.
2022
A framework for water security data gathering strategies
.
Water
14
,
2907
.
Cai
J. P.
,
He
Y.
,
Xie
R.
&
Liu
Y.
2020
A footprint-based water security assessment: An analysis of Hunan province in China
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
245
,
118485
.
Cao
J. Y.
,
Yan
Z. C.
,
Wan
J. Q.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Ye
G.
,
Long
Y. P.
&
Xie
Q. M.
2022
Comprehensive evaluation model for urban water security: A case study in Dongguan, China
.
Water
14
,
3957
.
Cook
C.
&
Bakker
K.
2012
Water security: Debating an emerging paradigm
.
Global Environmental Change
22
(
1
),
94
102
.
Grasham
C. F.
,
Korzenevica
M.
&
Charles
K. J.
2019
On considering climate resilience in urban water security: A review of the vulnerability of the urban poor in sub-Saharan Africa
.
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water
6
(
3
),
e1344
.
Guo
S. L.
,
Chen
Q. Y.
,
He
Y.
&
Xu
D. D.
2022
Spatial–temporal features and correlation studies of county rural hollowing in Sichuan
.
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
19
,
9075
.
Hasan
M.
&
Ridwan
D.
2021
Water security on Java island*
.
Irrigation & Drainage
70
,
370
379
.
He
G.
&
Ruan
J.
2022
Study on ecological security evaluation of Anhui Province based on normal cloud model
.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
29
,
16549
16562
.
Hoekstra
A. Y.
,
Buurman
J.
&
van Ginkel
K. C. H.
2018
Urban water security: A review
.
Environmental Research Letters
13
(
5
),
053002
.
Jiao
S. S.
,
Pan
Z. S.
,
Chen
Y. T.
&
Li
Y. B.
2020
Cloud annealing: A novel simulated annealing algorithm based on cloud model
.
IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems
E103.D
(
1
),
85
92
.
Kchouk
S.
,
Melsen
L. A.
,
Walker
D. W.
&
van Oel
P. R.
2022
A geography of drought indices: Mismatch between indicators of drought and its impacts on water and food securities
.
Natural Hazards & Earth System Sciences
22
,
323
344
.
Lu
C. X.
,
Deng
O.
&
Li
Y. Q.
2021
A study on spatial variation of water security risks for the Zhangjiakou region
.
Journal of Resources and Ecology
12
(
1
),
91
98
.
Lu
S. B.
,
Lu
W. J.
,
Xu
M.
,
Taghizadeh-Hesary
F.
&
Tang
Y.
2023
Water-energy-food security under green finance constraints in Southwest China
.
Energy Economics
118
,
106478
.
Nie
R.
,
Tian
Z.
,
Wang
J.
,
Zhang
H.
&
Wang
T.
2018
Water security sustainability evaluation: Applying a multistage decision support framework in industrial region
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
196
,
1681
1704
.
Ruan
D. M.
,
Bian
J. M.
,
Wang
Q.
,
Wu
J. J.
,
Yu
Y. X.
&
Gu
Z. Q.
2021
Application of modified cloud model-level eigenvalue method in water quality evaluation
.
Journal of Hydrology
603
,
126980
.
Sahin
O.
,
Siems
R.
,
Richards
R. G.
,
Helfer
F.
&
Stewart
R. A.
2017
Examining the potential for energy-positive bulk-water infrastructure to provide long-term urban water security: a systems approach
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
143
,
557
556
.
Sun
K.
,
Han
J. M.
,
Wu
Q. R.
,
Xie
W. S.
,
He
W. B.
,
Yang
Z. Z.
,
Wang
Y. B.
,
Liu
J. C.
&
Shi
E. H.
2024
The coupling coordination and spatiotemporal evolution of industrial water-energy-CO2 in the Yellow River Basin
.
Science of the Total Environment
912
,
169012
.
United Nations
2015
Transforming Our World: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development
.
United Nations
,
New York
.
Van Ginkel
K. C. H.
,
Hoekstra
A. Y.
,
Buurman
J.
&
Hogeboom
R. J.
2018
Urban water security dashboard: Systems approach to characterizing the water security of cities
.
Journal of Water Resources and Planning and Management
144
(
12
),
04018075.1
04018075.11
.
Veettil
A. V.
,
Mishra
A. K.
&
Green
T. R.
2022
Explaining water security indicators using hydrologic and agricultural systems models
.
Journal of Hydrology 607, 127463
.
Wang
J. X.
,
Li
Y. R.
,
Huang
J. K.
,
Yan
T. T.
&
Sun
T. H.
2017
Growing water scarcity, food security and government responses in China
.
Global Food Security 14, 9–17
.
Wang
Y. F.
,
Sun
K.
,
Li
L.
,
Lei
Y. L.
,
Wu
S. M.
,
Wang
F.
&
Luo
J. Y.
2022
The optimal allocation and the evaluation of water resources carrying capacity in shendong mining area
.
Resources Policy 77, 102738
.
Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Su, X., Qi, L. & Liu, M. 2019 Evaluation of the comprehensive carrying capacity of interprovincial water resources in China and the spatial effect. Journal of Hydrology 575, 794–809.
Wang
X. X.
,
Chen
Y. N.
,
Li
Z.
,
Fang
G. H.
&
Wang
Y.
2020
Development and utilization of water resources and assessment of water security in Central Asia
.
Agricultural Water Management
240
,
106297
.
Water, U. N.
2013
Water Security and the Global Water Agenda
.
United Nations University
,
Hamilton, Canada
.
Xia
X. Y.
,
Liu
B.
,
Tian
R.
,
He
Z. L.
,
Han
S. Y.
,
Pan
K.
,
Yang
J. J.
&
Zhang
Y. T.
2023
An interval water demand prediction method to reduce uncertainty: A case study of Sichuan Province, China
.
Environmental Research
238
(
1
),
117143
.
Yang
L. Z.
,
Chen
Y. Z.
,
Lu
H. W.
,
Qiao
Y. F.
,
Peng
H.
,
He
P. M.
&
Zhao
Y. S.
2023
Cloud model driven assessment of interregional water ecological carrying capacity and analysis of its spatial-temporal collaborative relation
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
384
,
135562
.
Yin
B. L.
,
Guan
D. J.
,
Zhou
L. L.
,
Zhou
J.
&
He
X. J.
2020
Sensitivity assessment and simulation of water resource security in karst areas within the context of hydroclimate change
.
Journal of Cleaner Production
258
,
120994
.
Zeng
X. J.
,
Hu
N.
,
Liu
Y. L.
,
He
J. W.
,
Shang
X. Z.
,
Ning
H. M.
&
Shao
L.
2023
Prediction and evaluation of projectile damage in composite plates using the neural network–cloud model
.
Frontiers in Materials
10.3389
,
1164090
.
Zhang
J. T.
&
Dong
Z. C.
2022
Assessment of coupling coordination degree and water resources carrying capacity of Hebei Province (China) based on WRESP2D2P framework and GTWR approach
.
Sustainable Cities and Society
82
, 103862.
Zhang
Z. F.
,
He
W. J.
,
An
M.
,
Degefu
D. M.
,
Yuan
L.
,
Shen
J. Q.
,
Liao
Z. Y.
&
Wu
X.
2019
Water security assessment of China's one belt and one road region
.
Water
11
,
607
.
Zhang
Y.
,
Fu
Z. H.
,
Xie
Y. L.
,
Li
Z.
,
Liu
Y. X.
,
Zhang
B. C.
&
Guo
H. C.
2021
Dynamic metabolism network simulation for energy-Water nexus analysis: A case study of Liaoning Province, China
.
Science of the Total Environment
779
(
7
),
146440
.
Zhang
W. G.
,
He
Y. F.
&
Yin
H. J.
2022
Research on Water Rights Allocation of Coordinated Development on Water–Ecology–Energy–Food
.
Water 14, 2140
.
Zhu
B.
,
Wang
T.
,
Kuang
F. H.
,
Luo
Z. X.
,
Tang
J. T.
&
Xu
T. P.
2009
Measurements of nitrate leaching from a hillslope cropland in the Central Sichuan Basin, China
.
Soil Science Society of America Journal
73
(
4
),
1419
1426
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution for non-commercial purposes with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).