Accurate and precise rainfall records are crucial for hydrological applications and water resources management. The accuracy and continuity of ground-based time series rely on the density and distribution of rain gauges over territories. In the context of a decline of rain gauge distribution, how to optimize and design optimal networks is still an unsolved issue. In this work, we present a method to optimize a ground-based rainfall network using satellite-based observations, maximizing the information content of the network. We combine Climate Prediction Center MORPhing technique (CMORPH) observations at ungauged locations with an existing rain gauge network in the Rio das Velhas catchment, in Brazil. We use a greedy ranking algorithm to rank the potential locations to place new sensors, based on their contribution to the joint entropy of the network. Results show that the most informative locations in the catchment correspond to those areas with the highest rainfall variability and that satellite observations can be successfully employed to optimize rainfall monitoring networks.
This study proposes a method to evaluate and optimize an existing rain gauge network using satellite observations.
The most informative locations in the catchment are identified using a greedy ranking algorithm.
The resulting optimal network provides higher joint entropy with fewer sensors.
The most informative locations reflect those with highest variance.
Quantification of precipitation is essential for improving knowledge about hydrological and water resources applications, including water allocation, water resources monitoring and risk assessment. Yet, the state of our knowledge is subject to the density and distribution of rainfall monitoring networks over territories. For this reason, it is desirable to have dense rain gauge networks (Li et al. 2019). However, despite their crucial role, rainfall networks have been declining in the last decades due to their high maintenance and operating costs (Mishra & Coulibaly 2009; Dai et al. 2017) and data are scarce or lacking in some areas of the world (Walker et al. 2016). Although many remote sensing products are now available, ground-based observations are still needed for their calibration, validation and bias removal (Li et al. 2019). In this context, many researchers have tried to answer the question on how to design optimal monitoring networks, which can guarantee accurate information and reduce uncertainty in precipitation (Chacon-Hurtado et al. 2017). The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) proposed minimum density requirements for hydrometric networks, based on the topography of the area and on the characteristics of the sensors adopted (WMO 2008).
Following the recent classification proposed by Chacon-Hurtado et al. (2017), methods for hydrometric network design can be distinguished as either statistics-based (e.g., Maddock 1974; Li et al. 2011), information theory-based, based on expert recommendations (WMO 2008) and based on the performance of hydrological models (Zeng et al. 2018).
Information theory (IT) (Shannon 1948) was first applied to water resources research by Amorocho & Espildora (1973) and then introduced by Caselton & Husain (1980) to design a rainfall network. From that moment on, many researchers have applied IT to solve the monitoring network design problem (Keum et al. 2017), for precipitation (e.g., Chen et al. 2008; Yoo et al. 2008), streamflow (e.g., Alfonso et al. 2013; Keum et al. 2019) and groundwater networks (e.g., Leach et al. 2016). The main principle behind all these studies is to maximize the information provided by the network, expressed through the concept of joint entropy (Shannon 1948). Many authors proposed multi-objective approaches, such as the minimization of network redundancy, expressed by total correlation (Alfonso et al. 2010b, 2013), mutual information (Chen et al. 2008; Li et al. 2012; Fahle et al. 2015) and directional information transfer (Yang & Burn 1994). Some studies adopted additional objective functions not related to IT, such as hydrological model efficiency (Xu et al. 2015), rainfall field interpolation accuracy (Xu et al. 2018) and spatiotemporality information (Huang et al. 2020).
A common issue for monitoring network design, in general, is that precipitation observations, and all the information we can derive from them, are available only at the locations where sensors are deployed. Thus, the question is how to decide which ungauged locations are the most convenient to place new sensors. Most authors either interpolate precipitation observations (e.g., Xu et al. 2018), for the case of rainfall networks, or employ hydrological models to produce water level time series at ungauged locations (e.g., Werstuck & Coulibaly 2017). However, when interpolating precipitation, some biases are introduced and the accuracy of the resulting rainfall field depends on the specific interpolation technique adopted and on the characteristics of the area considered (Hofstra et al. 2008). This problem can be addressed using remote sensing data, which have been widely used in the last decade for many hydrological applications (Li et al. 2016; Mazzoleni et al. 2019; Bertini et al. 2020). Remote sensing products proved to better reflect spatial relationships among objects when compared to interpolated and simulated data (Li et al. 2016; Huang et al. 2020). Many satellite precipitation products have been developed in the last two decades, with different spatial coverage, going from 4 to 25 km, and temporal scale, from 30 min to monthly resolution. Among all the satellite precipitation products, the most popular in hydrological applications are probably the CMORPH (Climate Prediction Center MORPHing technique) (Joyce et al. 2004), PERSIANN (Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information using Artificial Neural Networks) (Hsu et al. 1997), TMPA (Tropical Rainfall Measuring Mission Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis) (Huffman et al. 2007) and GPCP (Global Precipitation Climatology Project) (Adler et al. 2003).
A few authors have adopted satellite observations in network design; among them can be listed Contreras et al. (2019) and Huang et al. (2020). The former applied the conditioned Latin hypercube sampling method on a TMPA product to capture spatiotemporal precipitation in ungauged locations while the latter applied IT within a multi-objective optimization approach. However, methods that consider satellite information are very limited and still rely on prior data interpolation, without analysing the potential information content of satellite observations. As the main advantage of using a gridded dataset is the information contained at ungauged locations can be investigated without introducing interpolation biases, in this work we propose a method to use satellite precipitation estimates to evaluate and optimize an existing rain gauge network. The number and locations of new sensors are chosen in order to maximize the total information content of the network, given by its joint entropy, following the generally accepted fact that information content of time series can be taken as a value of variability that can indicate where it is more appropriate to measure rainfall (e.g., Krstanovic & Singh 1992; Mishra & Coulibaly 2009). Entropy at ungauged locations is evaluated using version 1.0 of CMORPH rainfall product, which matches the requirements of a fine spatial scale and good performance. In contrast to the study of Huang et al. (2020), we do not take into account redundancy reduction, with the aim of obtaining a robust network and ensuring the capture of essential information even in case of a sensor failure. Indeed, we do not mean to change or remove the existing stations, as most hydrological applications need long time series; instead, we aim to increase the network density in order to have a better understanding of rainfall characteristics and an improvement of water resources assessment in the area.
This paper is organized as follows. First, we provide a background on IT; second, the case study and the dataset are introduced; then, details about the methodology adopted are provided. Finally, results and discussions are presented and conclusions of the study are drawn.
The amount of information content and of redundancy given by a monitoring network can be measured using IT (Shannon 1948). Definitions of the IT-related quantities employed are presented below.
In monitoring network design and optimization problems, each precipitation time series recorded by a sensor can be regarded as a random discrete variable X, with marginal entropy . The information content provided by the whole network, made of N sensors, is given by the joint entropy .
Estimating joint entropy as defined in Equation (2) can be a complicated task, due to the difficulty in the computation of joint probability, especially for a large number of variables. To overcome this issue, the grouping property of mutual information (Kraskov et al. 2005) can be used. According to this property, joint entropy of a couple of variables X and Y is equal to the marginal entropy of a new variable Z, obtained agglomerating the original pair. The probability of occurrence of the new variable Z is then estimated by a histogram-based frequency analysis together with quantization, as applied by many researchers, e.g., Alfonso et al. (2013), Pádua et al. (2019), Ridolfi et al. (2012, 2014a, 2014b).
Quantization can be defined as the division of a quantity into a discrete number of smaller parts, often integral multiples of a common quantity (Gray & Neuhoff 1998). Its oldest version, which is rounding off, was already employed in 1898 for the estimation of densities by histogram (Sheppard 1897).
STUDY AREA AND DATA
The study is applied to the Rio das Velhas catchment, located in the central area of Minas Gerais state, Brazil. Rio das Velhas has a length of approximately 801 km and a drainage area of 29,173 km2, 10% of which is occupied by the metropolitan area of the city of Belo Horizonte. The river is the major tributary of Rio Sao Francisco and its catchment belongs to the Alto Sao Francisco basin. As the main productive activities of the area, i.e., agriculture, cattle and mining, require high amounts of water every year, constant monitoring and assessment of water resources of the catchment are needed. To this aim, the existing network made of 28 rain gauges needs to be improved.
The precipitation regime is typical of the region with tropical climate, with wet periods during summer (October–March) and dry periods during winter (April–September) (Pinto 2005). The catchment is generally exposed to frequent drought cycles, especially in the urban area (Santos et al. 2019). The climate of the entire catchment is influenced by atmospheric large-scale processes which control the precipitation regime. The main systems governing precipitation in the area are the South Atlantic Subtropical Anticyclone (ASAS), the Lines of Instability (LI) and the South Atlantic Convergence Zone (ZCAS). The former is responsible for the high decrease in rainfall during the period June–August and for atmospheric instability during summer, while the latter generate long-term precipitation with large volumes in the months November–January. An important role in rainfall generation is also played by the presence of two mountain chains, Serra do Espinhaço and Serra da Mantiqueira, in the eastern and southern parts of the catchment, respectively (Figure 1). The two chains represent a natural barrier for the air masses moving from the ocean to inland and the other way around, generating high instability and frequent precipitation in the area, which is characterized by the highest yearly rainfall volumes of the catchment.
Two rainfall datasets are considered, one from ground-based measurements and the other from satellite-based observations. The ground-based dataset consists of daily precipitation recorded by 28 rain gauges located throughout the catchment, with an average density of approximately 1,040 km2 per sensor (Figure 1). The observations are provided by the Agência Nacional de Águas (ANA) and are available for the period January 1994–December 2014.
The satellite-based dataset employed is the CMORPH product, which provides precipitation estimates derived by the NOAA Climate Prediction Center (CPC) using the MORPhing technique. The CPC MORPhing technique uses geostationary satellite infrared (GEO IR) consecutive images, provided every 30 min, to derive cloud motion vectors via cross-correlation (Joyce et al. 2004). The cloud motion vectors are then employed to propagate in time the passive microwave (PMW) precipitation rate estimates both in the forward and backward directions, using temporal weights. This algorithm is used to produce the so-called CMORPH Raw (or version 0.X), which is provided in a spatial resolution of 8 km × 8 km, with quasi-global coverage (60° N–60° S), and in a 30 min temporal resolution. To improve the precipitation estimates, bias correction was performed on the raw CMORPH. More details about the bias-corrected CMORPH product, also known as version 1.0, can be found in Xie et al. (2017). CMORPH products are available from 1998 to the present. In this work, we adopted version 1.0 which ensures good performance at a fine spatial scale (Xie et al. 2007; Sapiano & Arkin 2009).
The optimization of the monitoring rainfall network is conducted using ground-based and satellite-based precipitation time series, both referring to the period 1998–2014, for a total of 17 years of observations, meeting the requirement of a minimum 10 years of records when entropy is applied to network design (Keum & Coulibaly 2017).
The existing rain gauges provide daily precipitation depth estimates, while CMORPH gives 30 min rain intensity; therefore, we first pre-process satellite observations to make them comparable to the ground-based ones. First, we transform CMORPH intensity estimates into precipitation depth and we aggregate them to the daily scale, to have the same temporal resolution of gauge-based measurements. Finally, to match with the standard rain gauge minimum resolution, which is 0.1 mm for the case study, each record lower than 0.1 mm is set to 0 mm.
In both datasets missing records are removed from the daily time series with the following rule: if at time t missing information is detected in one of the rain gauges and/or in one of the satellite time series, then all the observations referring to time t, in both datasets, are removed.
The presence of zeros (i.e., dry days) in the precipitation records can affect the information content provided and, when there is a large number of zeros in the dataset, one must isolate zero and non-zero values and deal with them separately (Gong et al. 2014). One option could be to use a delta function to deal with zeros, as proposed by Gong et al. (2014). As an alternative, dry days could be removed, considering only wet periods for the analysis, as done by Huang et al. (2020). We adopted the second strategy. With the purpose of isolating only the wet periods, we removed all dry days in both datasets with the following rule: if at time t no rain is detected from both CMORPH and rain gauges, then all precipitation records referring to time t are removed. At the end of the mentioned pre-processing procedures, both ground-based and remote sensing-based observations are reduced from 6,209 to 5,120 daily observations.
The methodology we propose can be summarized in different steps: first, we perform experiments to rank the existing ground-based stations (experiment G) and the satellite cells (experiment S) based on their joint entropy, to identify the most informative locations. Then, a sensitivity analysis on quantization parameters a and k is carried out to reduce uncertainty in estimation of IT-related quantities. Finally, the optimal monitoring network is found by solving an optimization problem, which defines the locations where new ground-based sensors should be located, using CMORPH observations (experiment GS). All three experiments are solved using a greedy algorithm (Li et al. 2012; Alfonso et al. 2013; Banik et al. 2017; Xu et al. 2018), aimed to maximize the joint entropy provided by the network. A summary of the undertaken experiments is provided in Table 1. Further details are given in the following subsections.
|Experiment name .||Decision variables (description) .||Decision variables (symbol) .||Criterion/Objective function .|
|G||Existing rain gauges|
|GS||Existing rain gauges and CMORPH cells|
|Experiment name .||Decision variables (description) .||Decision variables (symbol) .||Criterion/Objective function .|
|G||Existing rain gauges|
|GS||Existing rain gauges and CMORPH cells|
Sensitivity analysis of quantization parameters
The estimation of both marginal and joint entropy requires the calculation of probabilities (see Equations (1) and (2)), which is done through frequency analysis of time series, previously filtered out with Equation (3), i.e., the quantization procedure (Alfonso et al. 2010a; Li et al. 2012; Huang et al. 2019). The filtering process requires the a priori assumption of the quantization parameters k and a. It means that obtained entropy-related quantities are influenced by the values of parameters k and a, which thus, in turn, have implications for the final layout of the optimized network. However, Alfonso et al. (2014) demonstrated that, when varying the quantization parameters, for each quasi-optimal set of stations, there exist most probable values of joint entropy, i.e., values that can be obtained using different combinations of a and k. These values will be referred to from now on as the most frequently selected or most probable joint entropy values. Following the procedure proposed by the same authors, we performed a sensitivity analysis on quantization parameters to identify the couple of values providing the most probable values of joint entropy for each quasi-optimal set of stations. The analysis is performed both on the ground-based and satellite-based observations. It can be summarized in the following steps:
Assume initial values for parameters k and a in Equation (3).
Rank stations based on their joint entropy and determine quasi-optimal sets of sensors ( or ).
Estimate joint entropy for each set identified in point b), varying parameters k and in the ranges and .
Select the final values for parameters k and a which provide the most probable joint entropy values for each set of quasi-optimal stations.
Monitoring network optimization
The optimal layout of sensors' locations is defined with an optimization procedure (experiment GS) that takes into account the information provided by both ground-based and satellite-based datasets. The optimal network is defined in two steps: first, select a set of quasi-optimal rain gauges from the existing network, i.e., the first m sensors from set obtained in experiment G; second, identify n new sensor locations to complement these m stations, choosing them among all the CMORPH cells available over the catchment, which are directly treated as a candidate for a new station location (Chen et al. 2008; Yeh et al. 2017). The final layout is then defined by the optimal combination of a subset of ranked existing stations and a set of new locations, which together provide the highest information content.
First, results of the ranking experiments of the datasets are shown, followed by our findings on the sensitivity analysis and by the optimal network obtained.
A map of the ranked existing rain gauges is shown in Figure 2, while the values of joint entropy obtained with an increasing number of stations is presented in Figure 3(b). The stations in the graph of Figure 3(b) increase according to the ranking obtained, so for instance, obtained with two stations is the one provided by the first two ranked stations, obtained with three sensors is the one given by the first three ranked stations and so on. Observing Figure 3(b), we can notice that, as the number of sensors increases, the joint entropy tends to converge to a stable value, in agreement with several previous works (Chen et al. 2008; Wei et al. 2014; Yeh et al. 2017). In other words, above a certain number of stations, adding new sensors does not provide a significant improvement in the information given by the entire network. The total amount of information given by the existing network is and already the first ten ranked sensors give almost 90% of .
The results of the ranking of CMORPH cells are presented in Figure 3(a) and 3(b). In both cases, only the first 28 cells ranked are presented, to facilitate the comparison with the existing rain gauge network, which is made up of 28 stations. At the catchment boundary, only the cells with more than 50% of their area falling inside the catchment are considered in the ranking process. Some boundary cells were therefore excluded, since they provide information mainly referring to an area that is outside our case study. To build the map of Figure 3(a), the identifiers of the satellite cells selected are placed in the centre of the selected cell. This is the reason why, when a boundary cell is selected, the corresponding identifier could appear to be outside the catchment boundaries.
It is interesting to note that none of the existing rain gauge locations is selected. However, we can notice that both the total amount of information provided by a satellite-based network, which is , and the trend of joint entropy with an increasing number of stations are very similar to the corresponding obtained for rain gauge observations (Figure 3(b)).
Sensitivity analysis of quantization parameters
Bins' width and probabilities of occurrence evaluated with quantization are influenced by the parameters k and a of Equation (3) and, therefore, a sensitivity analysis on those parameters is performed. The quantization parameters k and a are first both assumed equal to , as suggested in Huang et al. (2019) and Keum & Coulibaly (2017). These values are adopted to transform both rain gauges and CMORPH time series, which are, in turn, employed to solve Equations (4) and (5). The stations ranked at each step of the greedy algorithm correspond to a set of quasi-optimal stations. For each set and each data source we then compute joint entropy with parameters k and a both varying in the ranges and , for a total of 2,500 possible combinations.
The two-dimensional frequency distribution of joint entropy with an increasing number of stations is presented in Figure 4. For an increasing number of sensors (x-axis), joint entropy values (y-axis) are obtained for each combination of parameters k and a. Our findings confirmed those of Alfonso et al. (2014), i.e., that there exist values that can be obtained using different combinations of a and k, i.e., the most probable joint entropy values. Figure 4(a) shows that for rain gauge observations there is a well-defined interval of most probable values, while for CMORPH time series the same interval is still present but more dispersed (Figure 4(b)).
The main idea of this sensitivity analysis is to find the combination of parameter k and a which leads to the most probable values of , to reduce the uncertainty related to the evaluation of joint entropy. Since parameter values we first assumed (a = 1, k = 1) is one of the combinations providing the most frequent values, for both CMORPH and rain gauges, we decided to adopt and as the final values to perform quantization. These values are in agreement with those suggested by Huang et al. (2019) and Keum et al. (2017).
Monitoring network optimization
The optimal monitoring network is defined with an optimization problem that combines information provided by ground-based and satellite-based observations. We take a subset made of m optimal rain gauges and complement it with locations chosen among CMORPH cells, with the aim of maximizing the information provided by the final network, as expressed by Equation (6). The network is completed when adding one more station would provide an increase in total joint entropy, in principle, lower than .
The initial set of quasi-optimal rain gauges should be defined so that it provides a high amount of information, which is also lower than the maximum value of joint entropy given by the existing network. In other words, if we refer to the graph of Figure 3(b), the point representing the initial subset should be located in the ascending part, before it reaches the stable value of . In this way, we ensure that the high information content of the existing network is preserved but that, at the same time, the network can be improved. To this end, we take rain gauges, e.g., the first eight ranked.
The results we obtained are presented in Figure 5. To complete the optimal network only eight sensors are needed, four of which are placed in the west, two in the south and the remaining two in the north-east. Looking at Figure 5(b), it can be observed that combining a set of quasi-optimal rain gauges and a set of quasi-optimal satellite cells we obtain a total amount of information , higher than the total information provided by both the rain gauges and CMORPH networks. This value is achieved with fewer sensors. This is probably due to the fact that the observations from the two datasets are less correlated than those coming from the same data source.
To verify whether the ground-based and satellite-based datasets are capturing rainfall variability in the same way, their information content was analysed using the concept of variance.
For satellite-based observations, we computed the variance of time series recorded in each cell of the grid within the catchment, while for ground-based observations we used the time series recorded by the existing network, applying linear interpolation to derive variance values in ungauged locations. The results are presented in Figure 6. Comparing the two maps, it emerges that time series recorded from rain gauges exhibit generally higher variance than those coming from satellite. Despite the difference in the absolute values, the two datasets exhibit similar spatial patterns, with the highest values localized in the western, southern and south-eastern parts of the catchment. The high variance in the last two of those areas is due to the presence of the mountainous chains that block air masses moving from the ocean to inland and the other way around, generating high instability in the precipitation.
Comparing the map of the variance (Figure 6) with the location of the first eight ranked sensors (Figure 2), the sensors themselves are located in the areas with highest variance. Similar results can be observed for experiment S (Figure 3(a)). These findings confirm that entropy is mainly driven by precipitation variability and, therefore, time series variance (Alfonso et al. 2016) and that CMORPH precipitation estimates have high capability of capturing rainfall variability (Xie et al. 2007).
Our study gives insights into the information content of satellite data, both from a statistical and an IT perspective. It emerged that, when merging observations provided by rain gauges and satellite, an improvement in terms of information amount is obtained. However, more research in this direction is needed, to verify whether this result is due either to the optimal layout defined or to the combination of two less dependent data sources. To this aim, future developments should test the efficiency of the optimal network, for example, by comparing the catchment response in terms of discharge by means of a hydrological model. Similar research is currently ongoing.
It is noteworthy that using satellite observations to derive data at ungauged locations avoids introducing additional bias related to rain gauge data interpolation, which are to be added to the systematic bias of ground measurements, as for instance under-catch due to wind effects (Pollock et al. 2018), evaporation and blowing snow (WMO 2008). On the other hand, using satellite data to identify locations for new sensors has the disadvantage of working with a coarser resolution with respect to ground-based data. Therefore, additional considerations, such as areas' accessibility, should be done to properly locate new stations.
Even though the optimal network does not contain some of the existing stations located in the inner part of the catchment (Figure 5(b)), these stations should be kept operating, both to improve rainfall knowledge in the area and to meet minimum density requirements suggested by the WMO (2008). It is worth noting that accuracy, understood as the deviation of the measurement from the real rainfall value, is not included in our analysis. We are aware that rainfall, as for instance, measured by gauge-radar comparison, can have an average difference of ±8% (Vieux & Vieux 2005), and that similar situations can happen with satellite data. We are also aware that accuracy of rainfall estimates depends on rainfall intensity, topography and climatic conditions of the area and that the use of remote sensing products adds even more uncertainties to these estimates (Yang & Luo 2014). Further considerations in this direction could be addressed in future research, e.g., adding to each cell time series black noise within a predefined range and repeating the optimization procedure, obtaining a family of Pareto fronts whose probabilistic distribution can be analysed. Finally, some limitations may arise when applying the methods in small catchments, as some of them could be characterized by localized convective rainfall events, while some others could have more uniformly distributed precipitation, depending on the climate and topography of the study area.
In this paper we present a method to optimize rain gauge networks using satellite observations with an entropy-based approach. The main idea is to use CMORPH precipitation records to derive information at ungauged locations and identify the most suitable locations to place new ground-based sensors, based on their information content.
To quantify the information achievable by rainfall records we applied the concept of joint entropy (JH). To identify the most informative locations within the catchment, we ranked the existing rain gauges and satellite cells based on their joint entropy, employing a greedy ranking algorithm. The results show that, in both cases, the first eight ranked stations are located in the areas with the highest variance of time series, confirming what had emerged in previous literature works, i.e., that entropy is mainly driven by precipitation variability. Although the locations selected in the two optimizations were not matching, the two networks, rain gauge-based and satellite-based, provide a similar amount of information from the IT perspective.
Finally, we combined the information coming from the two datasets to define the optimal network layout. The optimal network configuration is made of the first eight ranked existing rain gauges, complemented with eight locations chosen from CMORPH observations through an optimization problem, based on the maximization of the joint entropy. The number of existing rain gauges, i.e., eight, is chosen in order to preserve the high information content of the original network, while the addition of satellite cells is stopped when the increment in joint entropy is very limited, i.e., lower than . The total amount of information provided by the optimal network is higher than the corresponding value obtained in the two previous networks considering the same number of sensors. Also, in this case, the most informative locations were found to be in the areas of the catchment with the highest variance. It is important to note that, although the optimal layout does not include all the existing rain gauges, we intend to preserve also the stations excluded, in order to maintain time series accuracy and length and to obtain a robust network.
An investigation of the variance distribution over the catchment from the two datasets was also conducted, to check whether the two data sources were capturing the same rainfall variability. It emerged that, despite a difference in the absolute value, with higher values for ground-based observations, the spatial pattern of variance is the same for both data sources. The south and south-east areas and the western part of the catchment have the highest variance, probably due to the influence of topography.
In conclusion, satellite observations proved to be a powerful tool to derive rainfall records at ungauged locations to solve the network optimization problem. However, this result should be interpreted carefully and more research is needed to verify whether the significant information obtained is due either to the combination of two different and less dependent data sources or to the specific spatial configuration of sensors. Furthermore, the spatial scale of CMORPH product, even if finer than that of other satellite-based products, still remains coarser than the resolution of rain gauges. Other considerations, such as areas' accessibility, are needed to precisely locate the sensors within the identified cells.
Satellite observations are from CMORPH, released by Xie et al. (2019) (website https://data.nodc.noaa.gov/cgi-bin/iso?id=gov.noaa.ncdc:C00948#). Ground-based precipitation data are from Agência Nacional de Águas, HidroWeb Portal of the National Water Resources Information System (SNIRH) (website http://www.snirh.gov.br/hidroweb). The authors declare no competing interest. C.B., F.R. and F.N. were supported by La Sapienza University of Rome in Italy; E.R. was partially supported by the Centre of Natural Hazards and Disaster Science (CNDS) in Sweden (www.cnds.se); L.P. was supported by Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (CAPES). The contributions of the authors was as follows: CB: conceptualization, data analysis, writing, editing, analysis of the results; ER: study orientation, methods, manuscript structure, analysis of the results, editing; LP: case study, data collection; FR: analysis of the results, editing; FN: analysis of the results, editing; LA: study orientation, methods, manuscript structure, analysis of the results, editing. We thank the two anonymous reviewers for their positive and constructive comments, which helped improve the paper.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are available from an online repository or repositories. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/metadata/landing-page/bin/iso?id=gov.noaa.ncdc:C00948#; http://www.snirh.gov.br/hidroweb