With global warming and the increase in extreme precipitation events, floods are becoming more frequent in mountainous areas, and the safety of lives and property of people is seriously threatened. However, understanding of the flooding process in uninformative mountainous areas is limited due to the lack of high-quality hydrometeorological data. Hence, this study adopts the MIKE21 model to simulate flood inundation in the Shadai River basin in the Qilian Mountain region of the northern Tibetan Plateau as an example. This validates the model-simulated flow and inundation extent using the flow data obtained from the calculation of the flood trace points, extent of inundation, and high-resolution remote sensing images. The results show that the flash flood inundation mainly occurs at 12:00–01:00 AM on 18 August 2022, and the simulated and actual maximum inundation areas are 7.9 and 9.5 km2, respectively. The fitted F-statistic value is 0.81, and the relative error between the calculated flow rate of the flood trace point and the model-simulated flow rate is 8%, indicating good consistency. Furthermore, an in-depth exploration of the model parameter sensitivity reveals that the use of distributed Manning's roughness coefficient value has higher simulation accuracy.

  • Using high-resolution GF-7 images and UAV data, the MIKE21 model was used to simulate the flood evolution process in the Shadai River basin.

  • The measured flood mark data were used to calculate the maximum flood inundation area and peak flood flow in the Shadai River without data.

  • Distributed Manning's efficiency coefficients are used during the parameterisation of the MIKE21 model to improve simulation accuracy.

With global warming, the north-western region of China is experiencing a process of change from warm-dry to warm-wet, and this transition is most pronounced in areas such as the Qilian Mountains in the northern part of the Tibetan Plateau (Shi et al. 2003). The potential threat of this change to the safety of human life and property has become increasingly concerning (Peters 1990; Daniel et al. 2007; Manzanedo & Manning 2020). The Qilian Mountains are an important ecological barrier and watershed in the north-western region of China, and play an important role in safeguarding the ecological security of China. In the last 57 years, temperature and precipitation in the Qilian Mountains have increased significantly with a trend of 0.35 °C/decade and 14.7 mm/decade, respectively (Jing et al. 2022). Several phenomena such as glacier melting, permafrost thawing, and increased runoff can be attributed to the increase in extreme rainfall events. The Qilian Shan region contains a large number of mountainous sub-watersheds, which greatly increase the chances of flash floods caused by extreme rainfall in the region (Ye et al. 2022).

Flash flooding is one of the most catastrophic natural disasters. It may originate in a small watershed in mountainous regions due to rainfall and sudden fluctuations in surface runoff. It is characterised by fierce, fast, and destructive runoff, thus making prediction and prevention difficult (Follum et al. 2017; Song et al. 2023). This causes huge negative socio-economic impacts and loss of tens of thousands of lives each year globally (Grimaldi et al. 2019). Flash floods and mudslides were triggered by heavy rainfall in the Shadai River basin on 18 August 2022, which caused numerous casualties. Considering its surrounding environment, disaster distribution characteristics, and the availability of data for research, this area can serve as a typical representative watershed for flash flood analyses in the Qilian Mountains.

Research on flash flood disasters has mainly focused on their spatial and temporal distribution characteristics, cause analysis, inundation simulation, forecasting and early warning, risk management, assessment of losses, emergency response, and prevention and control measures (Beillouin et al. 2021; Peng et al. 2023). With global warming causing the melting of snow and ice and thereby increasing weather extremes, damage-costs from future flood events in high-altitude mountainous regions is expected to increase exponentially. It is critical to accurately predict the hydrological lines of flooding and the areas of inundation in order to fundamentally mitigate damage caused by such floods and increase flood resilience. Areas prone to flash floods are mostly remote mountainous and upland areas with harsh weather, complex landscapes, and economic underdevelopment, where it is very difficult to build and maintain hydrological stations or detect runoff, and it is impossible to obtain hydrological flow data (Huo et al. 2021). These areas are broadly referred to as undocumented areas, especially in areas such as the Shadai River basin. This poses a significant challenge for flood modelling and the subsequent development of mitigation measures. The current proliferation of remotely sensed observations and open-access high-resolution hydrological datasets can circumvent limitations in data availability. Therefore, current flood modelling based on geographic information system (GIS) is the mainstream direction of flood modelling. Contrarily, hydrological–hydrodynamic modelling shows great promise in the field of water resources, where complex hydrological phenomena and processes can be transformed into simple scientific models, greatly improving the efficiency and accuracy of hydrological calculations; therefore, this is widely used in watersheds where hydrological data is scarce. Currently, studies on the dynamic simulation of flash flood inundations often use a single hydrological or hydrodynamic model. Distributed hydrological models such as the VIC (Nanda et al. 2019), SWAT (Maru et al. 2023), TOPMODEL (Vincendon et al. 2010), HEC-HMS (Wang et al. 2018), and Hebei rainwater models (Li & Zhang 2017) were widely used to simulate flash floods in small watersheds. Some studies (Sun et al. 2018) have used several synthetic satellite precipitation products from the Huai River basin as input data for the VIC model, providing a strong support for water management in undocumented areas. With the continuous development of hydrological simulation to mitigate the impacts of floods, researchers have developed hydrodynamic models to simulate the flood time with continued improvement of performance (Teng et al. 2018; Bates 2022). A large number of hydrodynamic models were gradually used in the simulation and analysis and research of flash flood processes, such as FloodMap-HydroInundation2D (Gao et al. 2023), HEC-RAS (Iuliia et al. 2019), LISFLOOD (Komi et al. 2017; Li et al. 2021), and other models, which are mainly used by solving complex differential equations on high-resolution numerical grids to simulate flooding (Razavi et al. 2012). A single hydrological or hydrodynamic model has certain limitations, whether it is in regard to the calculation of the flood flow or the change in water level; it is difficult to reproduce the entire process of flood occurrence and development in a refined way; only by coupling the two models with each other can we compensate for the shortcomings of the two models, which is also the development trend of storm flood simulation (Hao et al. 2023). Most case studies of urban flood modelling in China focused only on one-dimensional validation by comparing the results of simulations with those of the corresponding stage records (Yin et al. 2015), predicting that two-dimensional inundation information is not always validated mainly due to the lack of available validation data. Nandi generated high-resolution flow simulations as well as accurate flood inundation maps by coupling the VIC hydrological model with the LISFLOOD 2D hydrodynamic model in the upper Krishna basin (Nandi & Reddy 2022), and used it to validate the simulated flood extents with Sentinel-1 SAR data, which were in good agreement. Some people (Li et al. 2019) used TOPMODEL coupled with the MIKE FLOOD model to simulate the maximum water depth and duration of a flood event, and validated the results of the simulation model by comparing the calculated and field-measured maximum floodplain inundation, and obtained detailed flash flood risk maps in undocumented areas.

MIKE (DHI MIKE) is a suite of software product developed by the Danish Institute for Water Resources and the Water Environment (DHI) (Patro et al. 2009) as a specialised engineering package that directly integrates high-resolution digital terrain elevation data with a range of numerical models, including 1D MIKE11, 2D MIKE21, and other models (Taylan & Damçayırı 2023). The 1D MIKE11 model can be used to predict the capacity of water environments in lakes, rivers, and estuaries (Petroselli et al. 2020; Wu et al. 2020), as well as for inundation risk assessment (Luan et al. 2016). The hydrodynamics module in the 2D MIKE21 model is the most fundamental module of the model, which can be used to simulate flood currents, sediment, and river water quality (Sun et al. 2024) in oceans, estuaries, lakes (Jiang & Peng 2023), and mountainous areas (Wang et al. 2019). Additionally, 2D MIKE21 was used to simulate downstream river flows and extreme flows to account for the internal relationships between simulated flows, measured water levels, and tidal ranges (Song et al. 2024), which effectively modelled the extent and depth of flash flood inundation (Li et al. 2019). The 2D MIKE21 model can simulate changes in water level and flow due to various forces, and can also simulate any 2D free surface where stratification is ignored (Wang et al. 2020). The coupling of the 1D and 2D models provides a great advantage for real-time simulation of flooding events.

Therefore, the objectives of this study were as follows: (1) To generate river network files in the river channel as well as the one-dimensional flow through the 2D MIKE21 model, coupling the hydrodynamic model to reproduce the dynamic process of flash flooding, and reveal the spatial and temporal characteristics of inundation. (2) The measured flood scar data were used to project the flood inundation area in the affected regions, and validate the results of the model simulation by combining post-flood high-resolution remote sensing images.

Study area

The Shadai River basin is located in Datong county, Xining city, and north-eastern Hung River valley of Qinghai province. Qilian Mountains encompass the northern and southern parts of the Tibetan Plateau, and also the Loess Plateau transition zones. The basin terrain comprises the northwest high and southeast low; the river is about 35 km long, the basin area is approximately 124 km2, the ditch elevation ranges from 2,550 to 3,970 m. The river's average specific fall of 44.1% is from the Heilin River, which is a first-class tributary of the Beichuan River (Yellow River, second level) Tributary Grade II, originating from Bahahu, Shadai village, Qingshan township, and Datong county. The region has an inland plateau continental climate, and according to the 1981–2010 meteorological element statistics in the Thirty-Year Compilation of Surface Climatic Data of Qinghai Province (1981–2010), the annual average temperature of the region is 3 °C, and the extreme minimum and maximum temperatures are −33 and 28.8 °C, respectively. The extreme maximum temperature is 28.8 °C, and the annual average relative humidity is 65%. The annual sunshine hours are 2,555.4 h, the average evaporation for many years is 1,158.1 mm, the average annual wind speed is 1.6 m/s, and the annual precipitation is 525.2 mm. The precipitation is mainly concentrated in June–August. The soil types were mainly alpine meadow, mountain brown-brown, black calcium, and chestnut calcium soils. The vegetation distributed in the region comprises mainly trees and shrubs, and the herbaceous plants include pearl tooth polygonum, tussock grass, and oriental strawberries.

According to the on-site visit and field investigation, as well as the ‘Investigation Report on Flood Disaster Hazards in Datong Hui and Tu Autonomous County, Xining City, Qinghai Province’, the Shadai River basin experienced a large flood in July 1959, with a peak flow rate of 36.1 m3/s. This flood reached the 1-in-20-year level and caused damage to farmlands and houses. On 19 August 2019 and 28 August 2020, heavy rainfall occurred in Datong county, Qinghai province, and the Shadai River basin received 25–50 mm of rainfall, resulting in flooding. However, the flood flow was relatively small-scale, its time duration was short, and it did not cause any casualties or damage to property. No large or very large floods have occurred in the history of the area. In the Shadai River basin, a total of 5.8 km of levees exists, with a flood protection standard of 5–10 years. Due to the long period of construction, some levees were damaged and were unable to perform their normal function of flood protection; therefore, when floods occurred, the defence capability was extremely low, resulting in huge losses. In recent years, as global warming has increased the number of extreme precipitation scenarios, the rainfall within Chase County has reached 114 mm in the first half of August 2022, exceeding the 50-year average for August. On 18 August 2022 under the influence of heavy rainfall, rainwater accumulated in a short period of time and was rapidly converted into water flow. Surface runoff in the Shadai River basin surged, triggering flash floods and mudslides and causing the river to divert, resulting in a disaster unfurling in towns and villages of Qingshan and Qinglin townships of Datong county; the event resulted in the deaths of 25 people and six people were reported as lost. Therefore, this study is based on the main affected area of the 18th August-flash flood in Datong county, Qinghai province; it encompasses the whole range of the Shadai River basin, with a total area of about 145 km2 (Figure 1).
Figure 1

Location of the study area.

Figure 1

Location of the study area.

Close modal

Data acquisition

The basic data include digital elevation models (DEMs), land cover data, soil texture, meteorological data, high-resolution remote sensing imagery, and unmanned aerial vehicle imagery of flood-affected areas. This study used DEM data generated from GF-7 imagery with a resolution of 2 m. The land cover data were obtained from GF-7 imagery with a resolution of 2 m. Soil texture data were sourced from the National Science and Technology Resource Sharing Service Platform (http://soil.geodata.cn), which was divided into two parts. Data from 11 meteorological stations around the Shadai River basin were collected. These included 3-hourly precipitation, maximum, and minimum temperatures; wind speed was acquired from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/) website, and hourly rainfall data as monitored by the rainfall station in Shadai village was obtained. Validation data from remote sensing imagery observed by GF-7 after the 11 September 2022 disaster, with a resolution of 0.8 m, and from drone imagery of the flood-affected areas, with a resolution of 0.046 m, were obtained and are listed in Table 1.

Table 1

Data sources and resolution

Data typeResolutionData sources
DEM 2 m GF-7 
Land cover 2 m GF-7 
Soil texture 250 m National Earth System Science Data Centre 
Meteorological data 3-h precipitation, maximum air temperature, minimum air temperature, and wind speed National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
1 h precipitation Rainfall station at Shadai village 
Remote sensing image 0.8 m GF-7 
Drone imagery of hard-hit areas 0.046 m On-site shooting 
Data typeResolutionData sources
DEM 2 m GF-7 
Land cover 2 m GF-7 
Soil texture 250 m National Earth System Science Data Centre 
Meteorological data 3-h precipitation, maximum air temperature, minimum air temperature, and wind speed National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration 
1 h precipitation Rainfall station at Shadai village 
Remote sensing image 0.8 m GF-7 
Drone imagery of hard-hit areas 0.046 m On-site shooting 

Flash flood inundation modelling

As flash floods occur in mountainous areas with complex subsurface conditions, hydrological processes, such as precipitation, evaporation, and infiltration, as well as hydrodynamic processes, such as surface runoff, must be considered simultaneously (Gai et al. 2021). Therefore, in this study, the MIKE21 model was selected to simulate the inundation extent of floods; the hydrodynamic module MIKE21 FM in the MIKE21 model is the core basic module of the model, and the Green-Ampt model was coupled with this to calculate the net rainfall. The estimation of evaporation was based on the empirical sinusoidal equation (Calder et al. 1983). The surface flooding process was modelled using the Saint-Venant system of equations (Zhu et al. 2018), taking into consideration the influence of water-blocking buildings and hydraulic engineering on flood evolution. This model has a simple structure, relatively few parameters, high computational efficiency, and strong applicability and was successfully applied to floodplain simulations in many areas (Wei et al. 2013; Banasiak 2019; Ren et al. 2019). Additionally, this model can utilise high-precision DEM data, land use, soil infiltration, and other subsurface information to achieve a refined simulation of flooding in undocumented mountainous areas.

MIKE21 uses a two-dimensional non-constant flow equation, which consists of the continuity equation of the water flow and the momentum equation of the water flow along the x-direction and the momentum equation of the water flow along the y-direction (Ding et al. 2018; Su 2018), which are expressed as follows:
(1)
(2)
(3)
where h is the water depth (m); Z is the water level height (m); u and v are the horizontal flow velocity components (m/s) in the x- and y-directions, respectively; g is the gravitational acceleration (m/s); and n is Manning's roughness coefficient.

The MIKE21 model was selected in this study to simulate the extent of flood inundation in the Shadai River basin in Datong county using the MIKE ZERO software platform. The initial input conditions of the model included the grid division of the study area and elevation values corresponding to each grid, simulation time step, initial water depth, roughness, precipitation, and evapotranspiration. The study area was gridded, and to ensure the accuracy of the calculations and to reduce the time required for the calculations, the grid was encrypted in the river channel and in the areas where the flood water may overflow. The rest of the area was gridded with larger grids (Zuo et al. 2020), with the total number of grids being 152,228. The entire flash flood simulation was set to start at 22:30 PM on 17 August and end at 05:30 AM on 18 August when the flood inundation process reached a steady state. The measurement was divided into 140 steps, with a b-step length of 3 min; Manning's coefficient was adopted to reflect the roughness ‘n’ of different underlying surfaces (Zaifoglu et al. 2019), and the roughness ‘n’ of the whole region was determined based on the fact that different features corresponded to different values of roughness, and empirical values were adopted in combination with the land use in the study area (Zhang 2012), i.e., river n = 0.03 (Zhang & Li 2012), construction land n = 0.04, agricultural land n = 0.025, grassland n = 0.03, and forest n = 0.06 (Guo et al. 2013).

During the second scientific expedition to the Tibetan Plateau, soil samples were collected from different underlying surfaces of the Shadai River basin, including forested land, cultivated land, grassland, bare ground, and river-bottom sediments. After the ring-knife method, parameters such as initial water content, soil porosity, and infiltration coefficient (Figure 2) were obtained for the different underlying watershed surfaces. The rainfall data from meteorological stations were interpolated with inverse distance weights to obtain the total precipitation. The coupled Green-Ampt model was used to calculate the net rainfall of the watershed as an input condition to the MIKE21 model by integrating the area weighting method. At the end of the simulation, the flood inundation area was obtained using ArcGIS software.
Figure 2

Permeability coefficient (Ks) corresponding to the different underlying surfaces in the Shadai River basin.

Figure 2

Permeability coefficient (Ks) corresponding to the different underlying surfaces in the Shadai River basin.

Close modal

In addition, this paper uses the relative error (Re) to assess the gap between model-simulated and calculated flows, and fitted statistical values (F) to reflect the consistency between the model-simulated inundation area and the actual observed inundation extent.

The relative error (Re) was calculated to quantitatively compare and analyse the model-simulated discharge with that of the calculated discharge at the flood mark.
(4)
where and are the calculated discharge (m3/s) at the flood mark point and model-simulated discharge (m3/s), respectively.
Fitted F-statistical values are commonly used during flash flood simulations to assess the consistency between the extent of inundation simulated by the model and the actual inundation area (Yu et al. 2016). The formula used is as follows:
(5)
where are the actual inundation area of the flood, inundation area simulated by the model, and the area of the overlap between the actual and simulated.

Calculation of flood flows and actual observed flood inundation extent

The flood flow during the 18th August-flood in the Shadai River watershed in Chase County was calculated based on the flood mark points and corresponding flood mark heights. The calculated flood flows were used as the initial conditions in the MIKE21 modelling rate determination process. The elevation of the flood mark point relative to the plumb line of the river network of the Shadai River was obtained by ArcGIS software, and the corresponding profiles (Figure 3), that is, all the elevation points within the same elevation level were obtained. The flood flow at the point can be obtained by solving the area of the overwater cross-section corresponding to the point of the flood mark and the wet perimeter of the river channel according to the differential method, which is given in the following equations:
(6)
(7)
(8)
where Q is the discharge; A is the overwater cross-sectional area (m2); P is the wet week of the river channel, that is, the perimeter of the overwater cross-section of the river channel in contact with the water flow; n is the coefficient of roughness of the channel wall; R is the hydraulic radius (m); and I is the slope of the energy grade line or slope of the channel, that is, the ratio of the difference between the elevation and the horizontal distance of the two points.
Figure 3

Flood profiles at two flood scar locations obtained from measured water elevations at flood scar locations.

Figure 3

Flood profiles at two flood scar locations obtained from measured water elevations at flood scar locations.

Close modal

Analysis of changes in rainfall processes

The Shadai River basin has an arid continental plateau climate, with precipitation mainly concentrated in August. Before the disaster, little rainfall occurred in the Shadai River basin, with maximum rainfall occurring on 15 August at an intensity of 8.3 mm/d, which did not cause a disaster. Different data pertaining to temperature and rainfall from 11 meteorological stations (Figure 1) around the Shadai River basin and the precipitation data from the rainfall station in Shadai village were used to interpolate the graph, which showed that the precipitation was 0 mm at 21:00 PM on August 17, and the rainfall in the Shadai River basin was 34.6 mm at 00:00 AM on August 18. From the data collected from the rainfall station in Shadai village, it was known that the rainfall gradually decreased at 01:00 AM, at a rate of approximately 0.1 mm/h, and then further decreased to 0 mm (Figure 4). Heavy rainfall was concentrated at approximately 00:00 AM, and the maximum rainfall in 1 h was 20–40 mm.
Figure 4

Interpolation results of 3 h rainfall at meteorological stations and distribution of 1 h rainfall at Shadai village.

Figure 4

Interpolation results of 3 h rainfall at meteorological stations and distribution of 1 h rainfall at Shadai village.

Close modal

Scenario modelling of flood inundation in the Shadai River basin

The hydrological boundary conditions of the Shadai River basin were extracted from ArcGIS and entered into the MIKE ZERO software to simulate inundation during the 7 h of maximum rainfall (22:30 PM on 17 August to 05:30 AM on 18 August). The following observations were made from the flood flow-per-village time-series map: (i) On 18th August 00:12 AM, the flood flow in the Shadai village section reached its peak; (ii) at 00:15 AM, the flood waters flowed through the village section of Qingshan; (iii) at 00:18 AM, the flood waters reached the Hejiazhuang village, and (iv) at approximately 00:21 AM, the flood reached the village of Lishunzhuang. Three villages were flooded within a span of only 8 min, which led to large and fast visible floods. (v) At approximately 01:00 AM, the flood finally reached the outlet of the Shadai River basin, that is, the village of Lijiamo, as shown in Figure 5.
Figure 5

Water depth and extent of inundation in different time steps in the Shadai River basin.

Figure 5

Water depth and extent of inundation in different time steps in the Shadai River basin.

Close modal

Actual observations to decipher the extent of inundation

Given that no hydrological stations exist in the study area for model validation through actual measurements of the inundation water depth, this study focused on assessing the consistency between the model-predicted inundation extent and the actual inundation area obtained from high-resolution remote sensing imagery, as well as the measured flood mark data. During the second scientific expedition to the Tibetan Plateau, actual flood mark point measurements were performed for the most populated flooded areas in the region to obtain the actual heights during flooding. In conjunction with drone imagery analysis, if the elevation of the house, road, or farmland on the same contour was found to be lower than that of the sum of the elevation of the flood mark point itself and the flood mark point height, this was taken as an indication that the area was inundated during the 18th August-flood. Thus, mapping of the actual extent of inundation during the flood was revised and is shown in Figure 6(b).
Figure 6

(a) Flood inundation elements in localised UAV aerial remote sensing imagery in Shadai village. (b) Flood interpretation area by flood mark data. (c) Extent of actual observed flood inundation.

Figure 6

(a) Flood inundation elements in localised UAV aerial remote sensing imagery in Shadai village. (b) Flood interpretation area by flood mark data. (c) Extent of actual observed flood inundation.

Close modal

The actual inundation of houses, roads, and farmland was thus determined. According to mapping statistics, 45 houses, 73 roads, and 0.426 km2 of farmland were completely flooded. The inundation of each element in Shadai village is shown in Figure 6(a).

Model validation

The model results in this study were validated using the flow values at the flood mark points and the observed inundation extent.

The model results were validated by observing the inundation areas. Considering the inaccuracy of image-observed flooding in densely populated areas, the inundation area inferred from flood marks was chosen for validation in disaster-prone villages. After the field visit, flood inundation was shown to be overflowing from the river channel, except for the area where the flood scar points were measured, and the extent of the flood inundation could be clearly observed from the images.

The relative error between the flood trace calculated and the model-simulated flow was 8%, which is in good agreement. The actual inundation area inferred from the GF-7 remote sensing image observation as well as the flood scar was approximately 9.5 km2. The maximum inundation area predicted by the model was approximately 7.9 km2, and the fitting F-statistic value of the two was 0.81, which corresponds to an overall good fit, as shown in Figure 7(a). According to the field study, the highest water level between the villages of Shadai and Castle Peak can be approximately 3.5 m, and the modelling results also show that the highest water level is 3.25 m, as shown in Figure 7(b). This also indicates that the model simulation results are in good agreement with the actual inundation. Overall, the model performed well in the flash flood inundation simulation predictions.
Figure 7

(a) Comparison of flash flood simulated inundation extent with that of the observed inundation. (b) Change in maximum water depth in flood-affected areas.

Figure 7

(a) Comparison of flash flood simulated inundation extent with that of the observed inundation. (b) Change in maximum water depth in flood-affected areas.

Close modal

Analysis of the causes of flash floods

From the results of the simulation, the area with the highest flood level is located between Shadai and Qingshan villages, where the ditch ratio drop is 35.3%, and the average slope is 36°. The area is surrounded by mountains on three sides, which makes drainage difficult (Mingrong et al. 2007). This, when accompanied by super-intense rainfall, quickly raises the water level in this area and produces a very strong destructive impact force on the houses and roads. Additionally, for the same rainfall duration, the water levels in the forested land area increased, those in the cultivated land area decreased, and both flood peaks and volumes showed a decreasing trend (Li et al. 2014). Contrastingly, in the Shadai River basin, the area of cultivated land is 53.13 km2 (Table 2), occupying about half of the area of the basin, and the area of forested land is very small (5.62 km2), which is weak against floods (Zhai et al. 2022). This is one of the reasons for the huge losses caused by the flood event of 18th August.

Table 2

Statistics on the area of different land-use types in the Shadai River basin

TypeLand useArea (km2)
Agricultural land 50.28 
River 4.23 
Construction land 6.36 
Grassland 53.13 
Forest 5.62 
TypeLand useArea (km2)
Agricultural land 50.28 
River 4.23 
Construction land 6.36 
Grassland 53.13 
Forest 5.62 

The reason for the 18th August-flood event becoming a great threat to the lives and property of the residents of the Shadai River basin is because of the distribution of towns and villages along the banks; this is a common problem in most mountainous sub-watersheds with serious disaster losses. Based on the extent of inundation, it can be judged that the areas severely affected by flooding were mostly those where houses were constructed close to the river without any flood protection measures, which led to severe loss of people and property (Martinez 2022). According to the field study, it was found that the banks of the Shadai River were irregular, the river channel was narrow, the population lived close to the river channel, and construction and agricultural lands, bridges, and roads crowded the river channel. This weakened the capacity of the river channel to discharge floodwaters, causing them to overflow from the river channel (Figure 8(a)) and get rerouted to a large portion of villages, agricultural land, and local infrastructure along both sides of the river and submerging them (Figure 8(b) and 8(c)).
Figure 8

(a) Crowding of river way by construction land and agricultural land. (b and c) Construction sites destroyed by flooding.

Figure 8

(a) Crowding of river way by construction land and agricultural land. (b and c) Construction sites destroyed by flooding.

Close modal

Manning's roughness coefficient uncertainty analysis

Manning's roughness coefficient is commonly used to validate hydrodynamic models and is a key parameter affecting flood model inundation simulations. Generally, the Manning's roughness coefficient depends on the floodplain land-use classification. In this study, an s-type Manning's roughness coefficient distribution is assigned to land-use types such as river, construction land, farmland, grassland, and forest land, which were identified through visual interpretation and analysis of the GF-7 remote sensing images (Zhang et al. 2021). The use of distributed Manning's roughness coefficient values provides higher simulation accuracy than those of the global values because the spatial consistency of the hydraulic roughness in the floodplain is considered (Na & Li 2022), as shown in Figure 9(a). A sensitivity analysis was performed to assess the effect of different Manning's roughness coefficient values on the inundation area, and it was found that small changes in those of the global values had a significant effect on the simulated inundation area (Wester et al. 2018), as shown in Figure 9(b). The global Manning's roughness coefficient closest to the measured inundation area was 0.06, with a simulated inundation area of 10.8 km2 and an F-statistic fit of 0.73. To summarise, the changes in Manning's roughness coefficients affected the simulation accuracy, and the simulated submerged area generated from the distributed Manning's roughness coefficients produced the best fit with the largest F-statistic fit value. The best fit was obtained from the simulated submerged area generated from the distributed Manning's roughness coefficients.
Figure 9

(a) Distributed Manning's coefficient and (b) simulated inundated area for different values of Manning's coefficient.

Figure 9

(a) Distributed Manning's coefficient and (b) simulated inundated area for different values of Manning's coefficient.

Close modal

Temporal and spatial assessment of model simulations

A dynamic simulation of the entire inundation process was conducted based on the two-dimensional hydrological–hydrodynamic model MIKE21, and the model simulation results were good. From the simulation of the flood flow, on 18th August at 00:12 AM, the flood flow reached its peak at the Shadai village section; at approximately 00:30 AM, the flood reached the village of Longwo, flooding three villages en-route within an 8 min duration, resulting in large and fast visible floods. According to field investigations, the Shadai, Castle Peak, and Lishunzhuang villages are the most seriously flood-affected areas. This is due to the fact that the river slope in these regions is steep, and they occur at a relatively low elevation. Coupled with heavy rainfall, there was a sudden increase in water flow causing flooding (Orlyankin & Lebedev 2015; Godara et al. 2023). The flood waters reached the outskirts of the Shadai River basin, the village of Lijiamo, at a 30-min difference; this lag was attributed to the slowing of the flood waters caused by the accumulation of large sediment-load due to a sudden narrowing of channel width (Heerema et al. 2022). This resulted in the downstream villages being less affected. From Figure 10, it is observed that as the distance increases, the water level at the flood scar point shows a decreasing trend, with the slope of the trend line being −0.02, and the peak flow rate also decreased, with the slope of the trend line being −5.49. This is basically the same as the Datong county 18th August-flash flood disaster review report provided by the Qinghai Provincial Water Resources Bureau, which shows that at 22:25 PM on 17th August, the Xining Meteorological Bureau and the Datong county Meteorological Bureau issued a red alert for heavy rainfall, which was followed by heavy rainfall in most parts of the city. At approximately 00:00 AM, on the 18th August, instant heavy rainfall in Qinglin and Qingshan townships, Datong county, and Xining city triggered flash floods and caused mudslides, resulting in flash floods that overflowed from the river. The flood flow in the Shadai village section of the Shadai River in Qingshan township and in the Longwo River section peaked at approximately 00:00 and 00:30 AM, on the 18th August, respectively. From the simulated spatial distribution of the inundation, the actual observed inundation area roughly matched with that of the results predicted by the model, and the fitting statistical value, F, was 0.81, which is a good fit.
Figure 10

Flood scar height and comparison of flood scar calculated flow and model-simulated flow results.

Figure 10

Flood scar height and comparison of flood scar calculated flow and model-simulated flow results.

Close modal

However, some differences were observed between the results of the model simulation and the actual results; the simulation results show that on 18 August at 01:00 AM. the Shadai River downstream of the Lijiamo village section of the flood reached its peak, ‘Datong county 18th August-flash flood disaster review report’ shows that at approximately 01:40 AM, the Lijiamo village section of the flood reached its peak. The reason for the time difference may be that in the actual flood process, the flood is accompanied by a large amount of sediment and a reduction in rainfall; the resistance becomes larger and the power becomes smaller, resulting in slower water flow. Furthermore, the eddy viscosity coefficient in the model had a fixed value of 0.28, which does not take into account the resistance change, and hence, a time difference between the actual and simulated results is generated. Additionally, it is difficult to obtain rainfall station data, and the spatial distribution is not uniform. In the process of interpolation, errors may occur in the rainfall data between different regions, resulting in certain differences between the final and actual simulation results.

In this study, the MIKE21 model was used to simulate the inundation of heavy rainfall floods in small watersheds in undocumented mountainous areas, providing important methodological support and decision-making basis for the numerical simulation of flash floods in small watersheds in undocumented mountainous areas and for the forecasting of disaster situations. The results of the study show that the model can better simulate the whole process of dynamic inundation of small watersheds in mountainous areas with no information about heavy rainfall flash floods, and the inundation time of flash floods in the ‘18th August-Flash Flood Disaster Review Report of Datong County’ is basically in line with the results of the model simulation. Spatially, the accuracy of the MIKE21 model validation can be verified by the inundation extent inferred and observed from the measured flood scar data and high-resolution remote sensing imagery, respectively, and good results were obtained, with an F-statistic value of 0.82 and a relative error of 8%.

This study also has certain shortcomings, and future research can be improved and perfected with respect to the following aspects: First, the precipitation data are obtained by the inverse distance weight interpolation method through the meteorological stations near the Shadai River basin and the rainfall station data in Shadai village, and a certain degree of variability will be present in the amount of precipitation depending on the region. Furthermore, the meteorological stations are far away from the Shadai River basin, and the meteorological stations have a resolution of 3 h, which is a low resolution for flood simulation, resulting in less than optimal inversion of spatial and temporal distributions of precipitation. In the future, more accurate radar rainfall data or precipitation data from multiple local rainfall stations can be used to input the model; Second, due to the specificity of the location of the study area, complete high-resolution imagery data were not collected, and the images used in the study were a mosaic of two views, dated 11 September 2022 and 22 December 2022, with a much longer gap between the secondary images, which may have resulted in inaccuracies in the inundation extent of the actual flood observations and Manning's coefficients, and time close to the occurrence of flash floods would be chosen to reduce the inaccuracies in the process of subsequent validation of the flash flood simulation. Finally, with the impact of climate change and human activities, the losses caused by flash floods will show an intensifying trend, and the early warning and forecasting of flash floods will face greater challenges in the future. Simulation studies on the scope of flash floods, the establishment of flood prevention measures for flash flood-prone areas, and studies on the pre-establishment of emergency rescue and relief programmes will provide an important scientific basis for the risk management of flood disasters in uninformed mountainous areas.

The authors thank all the members of the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program for their hard work. This work was supported by grants from the Second Tibetan Plateau Scientific Expedition and Research Program (2019QZKK0903) and the Special Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42041004).

All relevant data are available from an online repository or repositories at The National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/) website and The National Science and Technology Resource Sharing Service Platform (http://soil.geodata.cn).

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Banasiak
R.
(
2019
)
Hydrodynamic 2D model of the City Centre Hydrosystem of the city of Wroclaw and its flood capacity analysis
,
Acta Scientiarum Polonorum-Formatio Circumiectus
,
18
(
2
),
3
12
.
http://dx.doi.org/10.15576/ASP.FC/2019.18.2.3
.
Bates
P. D.
(
2022
)
Flood inundation prediction
,
Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics
,
54
(
1
),
287
315
.
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-fluid-030121113138
.
Beillouin
D.
,
Cardinael
R.
,
Berre
D.
,
Boyer
A.
,
Corbeels
M.
,
Fallot
A.
,
Feder
F.
&
Demenois
J.
(
2021
)
A global overview of studies about land management, land-use change, and climate change effects on soil organic carbon
,
Global Change Biology
,
28
(
4
),
1690
1702
.
https://doi.org/10.1111/gcb.15998
.
Calder
I. R.
,
Harding
R. J.
&
Rosier
P. T. W.
(
1983
)
An objective assessment of soil moisture deficit models
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
60
(
1–4
),
329
355
.
Daniel
B. B.
,
Henrik
S.
,
Miguel
B. A.
,
Richard
b.
,
Richard
H. W. B.
,
Tomas
C.
,
Peter
C.
,
Terry
P. D.
,
Julie
R. E.
,
Daniel
P. F.
,
Simon
F.
,
Antoine
G.
,
Anja
S. H.
,
David
W. H.
,
Craig
L.
,
Chris
M.
,
Mark
N.
,
Matthew
J. S.
&
David
R. B. S.
(
2007
)
Forecasting the effects of global warming on biodiversity
,
Bioscience
,
57
(
3
),
227
236
.
Ding
M.
,
Li
H.
&
Yu
D.
(
2018
)
Application of the MIKE model to flood evolution in the moon bubble flood storage area
,
Water Planning and Design
,
2018
(
9
),
49
51
.
Follum
M. L.
,
Tavakoly
A. A.
,
Niemann
J. D.
&
Snow
A. D.
(
2017
)
AutoRAPID: A model for prompt streamflow estimation and flood inundation mapping over regional to continental extents
,
Journal of the American Water Resources Association
,
53
(
2
),
280
299
.
https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12476
.
Gai
Y.
,
Han
L.
,
Li
R.
&
Lei
M.
(
2021
)
Applicability of MIKE21 for flood simulation in pre-mountain plain reaches of small and medium rivers
,
Flash Flood Defense
,
2021
, 250–255.
Available at: http://www.cnki.net.
Gao
D.
,
Yin
J.
,
Wang
D.
,
Yang
Y.
,
Lu
Y.
&
Chen
R.
(
2023
)
Modeling and validation of flash flood inundation in drylands
,
Acta Geographica Sinica
,
78
(
9
),
2271
2283
.
https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb202309010
.
Godara
N.
,
Bruland
O.
&
Alfredsen
K.
(
2023
)
Simulation of flash flood peaks in a small and steep catchment using rain-on-grid technique
,
Journal of Flood Risk Management
,
16
(
3
),
e12898
.
https://doi.org/10.1111/jfr3.12898
.
Grimaldi
S.
,
Schumann
G. J.-P.
,
Shokri
A.
,
Walker
J. P.
&
Pauwels
V. R. N.
(
2019
)
Challenges, opportunities, and pitfalls for global coupled hydrologic-hydraulic modeling of floods
,
Water Resources Research
,
55
(
7
),
5277
5300
.
Guo
F.
,
Qu
H.
,
Zeng
H.
,
Cong
P.
&
Geng
X.
(
2013
)
Flood hazard forecast of Pajiang river flood storage and detention basin based on MIKE21
,
Journal of Natural Disasters
,
22
(
3
),
144
152
.
Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/.
Hao
S.
,
Wang
W.
,
Ma
Q.
,
Li
C.
&
Liu
C.
(
2023
)
A numerical rehearsal strategy of flash flood disaster with hydrological and hydrodynamic modelling: Case study of ‘7·20’ flash flood disaster in Wangzongdian village, Henan Province
,
Water Resources and Hydropower Engineering
,
54
(
6
),
1
11
.
Heerema
C. J.
,
Cartigny
M. J. B.
,
Jacinto
R. S.
,
Simmons
S. m.
,
Apprioual
R.
&
Talling
P. J.
(
2022
)
How distinctive are flood-triggered turbidity currents?
,
Journal of Sedimentary Research
,
92
,
1
11
.
https://doi.org/10.2110/jsr.2020.168
.
Huo
J.
,
Qu
X.
,
Zhu
D.
,
Yuan
Z.
&
Zeng
Z.
(
2021
)
Runoff monitoring in the Lhasa River Basin using passive microwave data
,
International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation
,
103
, 102486.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag.2021.102486
.
Iuliia
S.
,
Alessio
D.
,
Neal
J. C.
,
Paul
B.
&
Attilio
C.
(
2019
)
Comparing 2D capabilities of HEC-RAS and LISFLOOD-FP on complex topography
,
Hydrological Sciences Journal
,
64
(
14
),
1769
1782
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1671982
.
Jiang
W.
&
Peng
Z.
(
2023
)
Study on Flow Velocity Distribution of Flood Flow Field in the Lake Area of Tianjing Lake Based on the MIKE21 Two-Dimensional Hydrodynamic Model
.
Science and Technology Forum
.
Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/.
Jing
W.
,
Ren
X.
&
Zhao
W.
(
2022
)
Spatio-temporal pattern variations of temperature and precipitation in northern parts of the Qilian Mountains and the nearby regions from 1965 to 2018
,
Plateau Meteorology
,
41
,
876
886
.
Available at: http://www.gyqx.ac.cn/.
Komi
K.
,
Neal
J.
,
Trigg
M. A.
&
Diekkrüger
B.
(
2017
)
Modelling of flood hazard extent in data sparse areas: A case study of the Oti river basin, West Africa
,
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
,
10
,
122
132
.
Li
R.
&
Zhang
S. F.
(
2017
)
The application and research of Hebei flood model in semi-arid area
,
Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering
,
28
,
19
25
.
Li
J.
,
Feng
P.
&
Chen
F.
(
2014
)
Effects of land use change on flood characteristics in mountainous area of Daqinghe watershed, China
,
Natural Hazards
,
70
(
1
),
593
607
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2023.105886
.
Li
W.
,
Lin
K.
,
Zhao
T.
,
Lan
T.
,
Chen
X.
,
Du
H.
&
Chen
H.
(
2019
)
Risk assessment and sensitivity analysis of flash floods in ungauged basins using coupled hydrologic and hydrodynamic models
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
572
,
108
120
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.03.002
.
Li
P.
,
Xu
Z.
,
Zhao
G.
,
Zuo
B.
,
Wang
J.
&
Song
S.
(
2021
)
Simulation of urban storm waterlogging based on SWMM and LISFLOOD-FP model–Jinan city as an example
,
South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology
,
19
(
06
),
1083
1092
.
Luan
M.
,
Yuan
W.
,
Liu
J.
,
Zhou
Y.
&
Kulejiang
D.
(
2016
)
Risk assessment of waterlogging in Tonglu County based on SWMM-MIKE11 coupled model
,
Water Resources Protection
,
32
(
2
),
57
61
.
Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/.
Manzanedo
R. D.
&
Manning
P.
(
2020
)
COVID-19: Lessons for the climate change emergency
,
Science of the Total Environment
,
742
, 140563.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140563
.
Martinez
A. E.
(
2022
)
Flooding along the fence: hydrological impacts along the Rio Grande at Eagle Pass, Texas
,
International Journal of Applied Geospatial Research (IJAGR)
,
13
(
1
),
1
15
.
http://doi.org/10.4018/IJAGR.298306
.
Maru
H.
,
Haileslassie
A.
,
Zeleke
T.
&
Teferi
E.
(
2023
)
Analysis of the impacts of land use land cover change on streamflow and surface water availability in Awash Basin, Ethiopia
,
Geomatics Natural Hazards & Risk
,
14
(
1
),
1
25
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2022.2163193
.
Mingrong
L. I. U.
,
Guangping
C.
&
Xiaoming
Y.
(
2007
)
Feature research and preventive countermeasures about the mountain flood and geological disaster in Ganzhou City
,
Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering
,
18
(
2
),
31
35
.
Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/.
Na
X. D.
&
Li
W. L.
(
2022
)
Modeling hydrological regimes of floodplain wetlands using remote sensing and field survey data
,
Water
,
14
(
24
), 4126.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14244126
.
Nandi
S.
&
Reddy
M. J.
(
2022
)
An integrated approach to streamflow estimation and flood inundation mapping using VIC, RAPID and LISFLOOD-FP
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
610
, 127842.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.127842
.
Orlyankin
V. N.
&
Lebedev
V. V.
(
2015
)
Calculation model of the flood wave velocity in forecasting of floods in the absence of information
,
Doklady Earth Sciences
,
465
(
1
),
1196
1199
.
https://doi.org/10.1134/S1028334X15110185
.
Patro
S.
,
Chatterjee
C.
,
Mohant
S.
,
Singh
R.
&
Raghuwanshi
N. S.
(
2009
)
Flood inundation modeling using MIKE FLOOD and remote sensing data
,
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing
, 37, 107–118.
Peng
J.
,
Liu
T.
,
Chen
J.
,
Li
Z.
,
Ling
Y.
,
De Wulf
A.
&
De Maeyer
P.
(
2023
)
The conflicts of agricultural water supply and demand under climate change in a typical arid land watershed of Central Asia
,
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
,
47
, 101384.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101384
.
Peters
R. L.
(
1990
)
Effects of global warming on forests
,
Forest Ecology and Management
, 35 (
1
),
13
33
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-1127(90)90229-5
.
Petroselli
A.
,
Florek
J.
,
Mlynski
D.
,
Ksiazek
L.
&
Walega
A.
(
2020
)
New insights on flood mapping procedure: Two case studies in Poland
,
Sustainability
,
12
(
20
), 8454.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208454
.
Razavi
S.
,
Tolson
B. A.
&
Burn
D. H.
(
2012
)
Review of surrogate modeling in water resources
,
Water Resources Research
,
48
,
7
.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011527
.
Ren
J.
,
Dong
Z.
,
Xu
W.
,
Zhou
Y.
,
Wei
Y.
&
Wang
J.
(
2019
)
Study on influence of river wavebreak forest on flood discharge ability based on MIKE21 FM model
,
Journal of Hohai University. Natural Sciences
,
47
(
5
),
420
424
.
Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/.
Shi
Y.
,
Shen
Y.
,
Li
D.
,
Zhang
G.
,
Ding
Y.
,
Hu
R.
&
Kang
E.
(
2003
)
Discussion on the present climate change from warm-dry to warm-wet in northwest China
,
Quaternary Sciences
,
23
(
2
),
152
164
. .
Song
S.
,
Wang
H.
,
Lang
Z.
,
Shang
Y.
,
Liu
Q.
&
Wang
L.
(
2023
)
Mountain flood simulation of small basin in Taihang Mountains using HEC–HMS model: A case study of Luluochuan River basin
,
Journal of Catastrophology
,
38
(
1
),
117
124
.
Song
C.
,
Shao
Q.
,
Chen
X.
&
Liang
Y.
(
2024
)
Evaluating and understanding tide-river interactions based on both physical models and data analysis
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
632
, 130765.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130765
.
Su
Q.
(
2018
)
Study on flood evolution of Songhua River flood protection zone based on MIKE21
,
Jilin Water Resources
, 437 (
10
),
12
15
.
Sun
R.
,
Yuan
H.
&
Yang
Y.
(
2018
)
Using multiple satellite-gauge merged precipitation products ensemble for hydrologic uncertainty analysis over the Huaihe River basin
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
566
,
406
420
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.024
.
Sun
Y.
,
Fu
J.
,
Ma
T.
,
Luo
Y.
&
Yuan
Q.
(
2024
)
Study on the influence of water recharge project on the effect of lake water quality enhancement
,
China Water Transport
,
24
,
91
93
.
Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/.
Taylan
E. D.
&
Damçayırı
D.
(
2023
)
2D hydrodynamic model for flood analysis in Kinikli Stream Basin (Tekirdağ, Türkiye)
,
Iranian Journal of Science and Technology, Transactions of Civil Engineering
, 48, 2691–2707.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40996-023-01298-1
.
Teng
J.
,
Vaze
J.
,
Kim
S.
,
Dutta
D.
,
Jakeman
A. J.
&
Croke
B. F. W.
(
2018
)
Enhancing the capability of a simple, computationally efficient, conceptual flood inundation model in hydrologically complex terrain
,
Water Resources Management
,
33
(
2
),
831
845
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-018-2146-7
.
Vincendon
B.
,
Ducrocq
V.
,
Saulnier
G.-M.
,
Bouilloud
L.
,
Chancibault
K.
,
Habets
F.
&
Noilhan
J.
(
2010
)
Benefit of coupling the ISBA land surface model with a TOPMODEL hydrological model version dedicated to Mediterranean flash-floods
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
394
(
1–2
),
256
266
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.04.012
.
Wang
L.
,
Ye
L.
,
Wu
J.
,
Chang
Q.
&
Zhang
C.
(
2018
)
Research on muilt-hydrological models applicability of flash flood simulation in hilly areas
,
China Rural Water and Hydropower
,
2018
,
78
84
,
90. Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/.
Wang
M.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Zhang
M.
,
Liu
C.
&
Sun
D.
(
2019
)
Numerical simulation of flood routing in the gully regions of small mountainous watersheds
,
Advanced Engineering Sciences
,
51
(
3
),
67
76
.
Wang
Q.
,
Peng
W.
,
Dong
F.
,
Liu
X.
&
Ou
N.
(
2020
)
Simulating flow of an urban river course with complex cross sections based on the MIKE21 FM model
,
Water
,
12
(
3
), 761.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030761
.
Wei
K.
,
Liang
Z.
&
Wang
J.
(
2013
)
Flood routing simulation of Mengwa detention basin based on MIKE21
,
South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology
,
11
(
6
),
16
19
.
Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/.
Wester
S. J.
,
Grimson
R.
,
Minotti
P. G.
,
Booij
M. J.
&
Brugnach
M.
(
2018
)
Hydrodynamic modelling of a tidal delta wetland using an enhanced quasi-2D model
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
559
,
315
326
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.02.014
.
Wu
R.
,
Ge
S.
,
Guo
X.
&
Xu
L.
(
2020
)
Dynamic water environmental capacity of the Shiwuli River based on a MIKE11 model
,
Journal of Anhui Agricultural University
,
47
(
2
),
288
293
.
Ye
W.
,
Huang
Y.
,
Zhou
Z.
&
Zhu
Y.
(
2022
)
Temporal and spatial variations of air temperature in the Qilian Mountains during the past 60 years
,
Science Technology and Engineering
,
22
,
1344
1353
.
Yin
J.
,
Ye
M.
,
Yin
Z.
&
Xu
S.
(
2015
)
A review of advances in urban flood risk analysis over China
,
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
,
29
(
3
),
1063
1070
.
Yu
D.
,
Yin
J.
&
Liu
M.
(
2016
)
Validating city-scale surface water flood modelling using crowd-sourced data
,
Environmental Research Letters
,
11
(
12
), 124011.
Zaifoglu
H.
,
Yanmaz
A. M.
&
Akintug
B.
(
2019
)
Developing flood mitigation measures for the northern part of Nicosia
,
Natural Hazards
,
98
(
2
),
535
557
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-019-03713-1
.
Zhai
L.
,
Lin
P.
,
Wu
F.
&
Ma
L.
(
2022
)
Impacts of land use change on flood processes in the Junshui River Basin
,
Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin
,
31
(
8
),
1812
1822
.
Zhang
B.
(
2012
)
Calculation of natural river roughness and method of taking its value
,
South-to-North Water Transfers and Water Science & Technology
,
10
(
01
), 25–28.
Available at: https://kns.cnki.net/.
Zhang
X.
&
Li
X.
(
2012
)
2-D flood routing simulation on the lower Yellow River from Huayuankou to Jiahetan based on MIKE21 software
,
Progress in Civil Engineering
,
170–173
,
1021
1024
.
https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.170-173.1021
.
Zhang
J.
,
Zhang
S.
,
Chen
S.
,
Liu
M.
,
Xu
X.
,
Zhou
J.
,
Wang
W.
,
Ma
L.
&
Wang
C.
(
2021
)
Overland flow resistance law under sparse stem vegetation coverage
,
Water
,
13
,
12
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13121657
.
Zhu
S.
,
Yu
Y.
,
Yu
F.
,
Liu
J.
&
You
Z.
(
2018
)
Flood routing simulation of Dongting Lakeshore Plain City based on MIKE21 FM model
,
Journal of Water Resources and Water Engineering
,
29
(
2
),
132
138
.
Zuo
J.
,
Zhang
H. X.
,
Deng
S.
,
Gu
P.
&
Lian
L. L.
(
2020
)
Analysis of influence of mesh partition on MIKE21 calculation in flood impact assessment
,
Earth and Environmental Science
,
612
, 012060.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/612/1/012060
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).