Landslides represent a significant natural hazard, especially in water-rich environments where the presence of water can drastically influence slope stability and deformation behavior. Accurate analysis and prediction of landslide deformation in such locations are critical for risk assessment and mitigation. This paper focuses on analysis and prediction of landslides in water environments through machine learning techniques by analyzing hydrological data of that geological location. The study employs the Elman Neural Network (ENN) model to create a predictive model. The ENN predicts future deformation trends based on hydrological data by identifying patterns in soil water. The performance of these models is evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, precision, and recall, ensuring robust validation against real-world data. The results show that the F1 score of the developed prediction system is 85%, which proves the effectiveness of machine learning in predicting landslide deformation based on hydrological data, and provides a reliable tool for the early warning system in landslide prone areas. The developed machine learning-based landslide risk assessment model through hydrological data not only predicts landslides but also can predict the level of groundwater and water quality, which are very helpful for emergency risk assessment and provides solutions to enhance the safety and resilience of communities in landslide-prone zones.

  • The study employs machine learning to analyze and predict landslide deformation based on hydrological data.

  • The study employs only hydrology of certain geological locations to develop an effective risk modeling system that accurately predicts deformation.

  • The study is helpful for emergency risk assessment and provides practical solutions to enhance the safety and resilience of communities in landslide-prone zones.

Landslides are a predominant and destructive natural hazard that can result in substantial economic losses, environmental damage, and loss of human life (Fidan et al. 2024). Their occurrence and impact are particularly noticeable in water-rich environments, where hydrological factors such as rainfall, soil moisture, and groundwater levels significantly influence slope stability and deformation behavior (Chen et al. 2023). Therefore, accurate analysis and prediction of landslide deformation in these settings are vital for effective risk assessment and mitigation efforts (Amarasinghe et al. 2024). In past research, predicting landslides often rely on empirical models and historical data (Sotiriadis et al. 2024). However, such approaches are often inadequate in terms of capturing non-linear relationships between different hydrological and geological factors that determine behavior of landslides (Nowicki Jessee et al. 2018). Furthermore, these traditional methods may fail to incorporate temporal dependencies and non-linear relationships within landslide processes (Intrieri et al. 2019).

Several research works have been conducted to predict landslide based on old historical data, geographical locations and hydrological data. Huang et al. (2016) discussed the chaos theory-based discrete wavelet transform-extreme learning machine (DWT-ELM) model which shows good results in predicting landslide displacement, the complexity and computational overhead associated with integrating chaos theory and DWT could potentially limit its practical scalability for real-time applications. Further evaluation of computational efficiency and robustness in diverse geographical settings would strengthen the model's applicability in broader landslide prediction scenarios. Zhou et al. (2018) explored the integration of wavelet transform (WT), artifical bees colony (ABC), and kernalized extreme learning machine (KELM), and achieved good results in improving the accuracy of displacement prediction, the method's complexity and computational demands could hinder its practical implementation in resource-constrained environments or real-time applications. Further investigation into scalability and efficiency is crucial to assess its feasibility for widespread adoption in early warning systems for landslide prediction. The study by Liu et al. (2020) effectively showcases the potential of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and gated recurrent unit (GRU) algorithms in predicting landslide displacements, there is a need for more comprehensive validation across diverse geological and environmental conditions to ensure the robustness of these models. Additionally, addressing the challenges of real-time data integration and model scalability will be critical for practical implementation in early warning systems aimed at mitigating landslide risks. Amarasinghe et al. (2024) comprehensively discussed rainfall-induced landslides in tropical areas, emphasizing rainfall's role in triggering events and identifying key risk factors. While offering valuable risk mitigation strategies, challenges like sparse data and dynamic land use complicated quantitative risk assessments in these areas. Fidan et al. (2024) explores the spatial patterns: of the natural ones in high, minimally disturbed mountainous areas, and anthropogenic ones at lower elevations with gentler slopes and higher human impact, emphasizing human activities as critical factors in landslide risk dynamics.

Recent advancements in machine learning (ML) and Internet of Things (IoT) have opened new avenues for enhancing landslide prediction accuracy and reliability (Sreelakshmi et al. 2022). ML techniques can process large volumes of data and identify intricate patterns and relationships that may not be discernible through traditional methods. This capability makes ML particularly well-suited for analyzing and predicting landslide deformation in water-rich environments, where multiple interdependent variables are at play (Abdalzaher et al. 2023; Cai et al. 2024; Ge et al. 2024; Lu et al. 2024). Marino et al. (2023) has developed an IoT-based low-cost sensor network that demonstrates promise in enhancing hydrological monitoring of landslide-prone areas, offering the potential for early warning system implementation through expanded soil moisture data collection and remote visualization using ESP32 boards and the ThingSpeak platform. Kitterød et al. (2022) explores the hydrology and underwater quality in countries. This technique can be adopted to analyze the hydrological data of the landslide-prone zones. Therefore, the hydrology characteristics in those zones can be obtained, which can be used for the risk assessment. Jia et al. (2023) have developed an optimization based ML technique to predict landslide displacement. In this work, the researcher has used least-squares support vector machine optimized Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) technique which can give a high accuracy but this method is time-consuming and requires larger data for processing. The study by Song et al. (2024) develops a model for predicting step-like displacement in slow-moving landslides in the Three Gorges Reservoir area, using Empirical Mode Decomposition (EMD) and IPSO-optimized LSTM neural networks. It effectively links displacement with environmental factors, aiding in risk reduction and providing insights into instability mechanisms.

This study aims to develop and apply an ML-based system for the analysis and prediction of landslide deformation in water environments. The focus is on leveraging hydrological data, including soil moisture content, precipitation, groundwater levels, and other relevant factors, to inform the predictive model. Specifically, in this study, we have developed the Elman Neural Network (ENN), a type of recurrent neural network known for its ability to capture time-dependent data. ENNs with backpropagation algorithms have their own advantages, especially when dealing with time series data, making them ideal for predicting events that evolve over time, such as landslide deformation (Gao et al. 2020). This study involves a comprehensive analysis of variables such as soil moisture, precipitation patterns, and groundwater levels, which are critical determinants of slope stability in water-rich environments. The performance of these models is evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, precision, and recall, ensuring robust validation against real-world data. The study has been conducted based on the hydrological data of the Chongqing provinces, China. Based on the obtained results, the developed predictive system demonstrates the efficacy of ML in predicting landslide deformation based on hydrological data, providing a reliable tool for early warning systems in landslide-prone zones. Early and accurate predictions of landslide deformation can significantly enhance risk assessment and mitigation strategies, ultimately contributing to the safety and resilience of communities in landslide-prone areas.

A landslide is a geological phenomenon involving the movement of rock, earth, or debris down a slope due to gravity. Factors such as water saturation from heavy rainfall, earthquakes, volcanic activity, or human activities can trigger landslides, which can cause significant damage to property and loss of life.

Causes of landslide

Landslides are caused by a combination of natural and human-induced factors that destabilize slopes. Hydrological factors play a significant role, with intense or prolonged rainfall, rapid snowmelt, and rising groundwater levels saturating the soil and reducing its stability. When water infiltrates the soil, it increases pore water pressure, which in turn diminishes the soil's shear strength, making landslides more likely (Barnard et al. 2001). Geological factors are also crucial, as the type of soil and rock, along with their structure and composition, significantly influence slope stability. Weak, loose, or fractured materials are particularly prone to failure. Additionally, human activities such as deforestation, construction, and mining can exacerbate landslide risks by altering the natural landscape and drainage patterns. The removal of vegetation, which stabilizes the soil with its root systems, further increases vulnerability. Earthquakes and volcanic activity are also natural triggers that can induce landslides by shaking the ground and causing slope materials to lose cohesion. Overall, landslides result from a complex interplay of hydrological, geological, and human factors that collectively undermine the stability of slopes (Persichillo et al. 2018).

Landslides are significantly influenced by hydrological factors, as water plays a crucial role in both triggering and impacting the stability of slopes. Intense or prolonged rainfall can increase soil moisture content, leading to soil saturation. This saturation reduces the cohesion and friction between soil particles, making slopes more prone to failure (Chung et al. 2013). Rising groundwater levels also contribute to landslide risk by increasing pore water pressure within the soil, which diminishes its shear strength. Heavy rainfall can lead to rapid surface water runoff, causing erosion at the base of slopes and removing critical support, thus triggering landslides. Figure 1(a) shows the landside due to heavy rainfall. Similarly, the rapid melting of snow adds substantial water to the soil, akin to heavy rainfall, and can destabilize slopes.
Figure 1

(a) landside due to heavy rainfall, (b) landslides due to river water making persistent wet conditions making chronic soil saturation.

Figure 1

(a) landside due to heavy rainfall, (b) landslides due to river water making persistent wet conditions making chronic soil saturation.

Close modal

Moreover, riverbank erosion caused by rivers and streams undercutting their banks during flood events frequently leads to landslides. The filling and fluctuation of water levels in reservoirs can induce seismic activity and alter groundwater pressure, potentially triggering landslides, a phenomenon known as reservoir-induced seismicity (Gupta 1992). Figure 1(b) shows the landslides due to river water. The persistent wet conditions due to river water can result in chronic soil saturation, which weakens slope materials over time and increases the likelihood of landslides. Additionally, poor drainage or alterations in natural drainage patterns due to construction or other human activities can exacerbate slope vulnerability. Understanding these hydrological processes is essential for predicting landslide occurrences and implementing effective mitigation strategies, particularly in regions prone to heavy rainfall or significant hydrological changes.

This section outlines the materials and methods used for investigating landslide prediction in Chongqing province, China. Further, the session details the landslide prediction using hydrological data and discusses the development of ML-based predictive modeling.

Geological location

The study area is located in Chongqing province, China, a region with complex geological and hydrological conditions frequently leading to landslides as shown in Figure 2. Chongqing is characterized by its mountainous terrain and fertile loess soils, which, while beneficial for agriculture, also leave the region highly susceptible to earth movements. The loess soils in Chongqing are typically Pleistocene sediments from Central Asia, deposited by wind and settled in moister areas. These sediments are loosely packed and prone to movement, creating a higher risk of landslides across much of Central and Northern China.
Figure 2

Geological location: Chongqing province, China.

Figure 2

Geological location: Chongqing province, China.

Close modal
Most landslides in this region are triggered by soil waterlogging, where flooding or high rainfall causes sediments to lose cohesion and collapse. However, in the case of the Daning River landslide, the sediments appeared dry, and the river was low, indicating that waterlogging might not have been the primary cause. This anomaly has led to speculation that the landslide could be linked to the construction of the Three Gorges Dam, located about 110 km downriver (Yin et al. 2016). The dam may have altered the distribution of geological stress in the area, potentially contributing to the landslide. In recent years, the reservoir slopes in the Three Gorges Reservoir area have been subject to the combined effects of extreme rainfall and reservoir regulation, making them highly susceptible to landslides as shown in Figure 3(a). The complexity of these geological and hydrological interactions underscores the importance of this study in predicting and mitigating landslide risks in Chongqing province.
Figure 3

(a) Landslide due to hydrological interactions in Gorges Reservoir, Chongqing, China, (b) Comprehensive analysis of the landslide triggered by hydrological interactions.

Figure 3

(a) Landslide due to hydrological interactions in Gorges Reservoir, Chongqing, China, (b) Comprehensive analysis of the landslide triggered by hydrological interactions.

Close modal

Figure 3(b) provides a comprehensive analysis of the landslide triggered by hydrological interactions. The figure clearly indicates that the soil beds have weakened due to the presence of a water body. This weakening is evident in the area where the slide has occurred, specifically in the downhill direction, as indicated by the arrow. The interaction between the water and soil has compromised the soil cohesion, leading to the observed landslide.

Landslide prediction using hydrological data

Landslide prediction using hydrology data is an approach of mitigating the risks associated with this natural hazard. Figure 4 shows the image analysis of the Chongqing zones in which the hydrological data are depicted. Hydrological data, including rainfall intensity and duration, groundwater levels, and soil moisture content, provides valuable insights into the conditions that precede landslides. By analyzing these factors, the research study can identify patterns and thresholds that indicate an increased likelihood of slope failure. Similar studies conducted in the Himalayan region have employed neural networks for landslide prediction due to the area's high susceptibility to landslides. Insights from these studies could demonstrate ENN's effectiveness in similar environments.
Figure 4

Hydrological data depicting river and ground water.

Figure 4

Hydrological data depicting river and ground water.

Close modal

Hydrological data for this study were collected from various sources, including rain gauges, groundwater monitoring wells, and soil moisture sensors strategically placed throughout the Chongqing province (Yin et al. 2016). These instruments provided continuous measurements of rainfall intensity, groundwater levels, and soil moisture content, essential for understanding the hydrological conditions preceding landslide events. Table 1 shows the average monthly data for a specific location, including rainfall, soil moisture content, groundwater level, reservoir level, and streamflow measured in Chongqing province. The data are measured using wireless sensors and IoT devices. Table 2 shows the annual rainfall data, which is collected from the metrological department of Chongqing. During data collection, we encountered several practical challenges during model implementation, including ensuring data quality, managing computational resources, and integrating with existing systems. These were addressed through rigorous data cleaning, leveraging cloud computing, developing flexible APIs, and providing comprehensive user training to ensure effective deployment and adoption.

Table 1

Average monthly measured hydrological data

Year-monthTotal rainfall (mm)Avg soil moisture (%)Min groundwater level (m)Max groundwater level (m)Avg reservoir level (m)Max streamflow (m³/s)
2024-Jan 150 25 2.8 3.4 45.5 50 
2024-Feb 120 22 2.7 3.3 45.4 40 
2024-Mar 180 28 3.0 3.6 45.2 55 
2024-Apr 200 30 3.1 3.8 45.0 60 
2024-May 250 35 3.5 4.0 44.8 70 
Year-monthTotal rainfall (mm)Avg soil moisture (%)Min groundwater level (m)Max groundwater level (m)Avg reservoir level (m)Max streamflow (m³/s)
2024-Jan 150 25 2.8 3.4 45.5 50 
2024-Feb 120 22 2.7 3.3 45.4 40 
2024-Mar 180 28 3.0 3.6 45.2 55 
2024-Apr 200 30 3.1 3.8 45.0 60 
2024-May 250 35 3.5 4.0 44.8 70 
Table 2

Annual rainfall data

YearJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecAnnual normal rainfall (mm)
2014 16 27 19 19 21 200 340 344 212 61 14 1,277 
2015 15 17 51 66 212 398 381 246 116 24 1,535 
2016 12 20 23 15 17 194 392 394 249 62 1,388 
2017 17 30 22 17 18 191 381 387 194 52 13 1,327 
2018 18 16 21 14 168 475 508 341 57 1,628 
2019 22 22 21 15 143 435 465 224 47 1,406 
2020 26 22 15 15 170 505 401 212 50 17 1,447 
2021 20 35 25 19 14 191 508 450 126 61 16 1,474 
2022 23 13 13 13 146 319 283 188 69 22 1,094 
2023 28 18 13 10 15 177 567 474 292 66 24 1,690 
YearJanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDecAnnual normal rainfall (mm)
2014 16 27 19 19 21 200 340 344 212 61 14 1,277 
2015 15 17 51 66 212 398 381 246 116 24 1,535 
2016 12 20 23 15 17 194 392 394 249 62 1,388 
2017 17 30 22 17 18 191 381 387 194 52 13 1,327 
2018 18 16 21 14 168 475 508 341 57 1,628 
2019 22 22 21 15 143 435 465 224 47 1,406 
2020 26 22 15 15 170 505 401 212 50 17 1,447 
2021 20 35 25 19 14 191 508 450 126 61 16 1,474 
2022 23 13 13 13 146 319 283 188 69 22 1,094 
2023 28 18 13 10 15 177 567 474 292 66 24 1,690 

When analyzed together, these datasets provide comprehensive insights into the hydrological conditions that can lead to landslides. Researchers can identify patterns and triggers associated with landslide events by examining rainfall intensity, soil moisture levels, groundwater fluctuations, and river discharge rates. This integrated analysis allows for a more precise understanding of how different hydrological factors interact to destabilize slopes. The data can be utilized to train advanced ML models, enabling the prediction of landslide occurrences based on historical and real-time hydrological conditions.

Development and deployment of predictive model

In this study, the ENN is developed. ENNs are a type of ML model, which are designed to handle time-dependent data. Unlike traditional feedforward neural networks, ENN have connections that form directed cycles, allowing them to maintain a state and model sequential data effectively. The ENN model effectively captured the non-linear relationships between hydrological factors and landslide events (Jia et al. 2019).

Figure 5 depicts the architecture of the developed ENN-based predictive model. The developed ENN consists of four layers which are input layer represented as i, hidden layer represented as j, the third is context layer given as c, and the final one is output layer represented as o. Each layer is connected using weights. The i layer is fed with the hydrological inputs such as rainfall, soil moisture content, groundwater level, reservoir level, and streamflow. The j layer consists of 10 hidden neurons. The developed ENN model consists of c layer which is also known as feedback layer the purpose of the c layer is to retain the information from the past step that helps the help the patterns from analyzing the previous data. The function and training process is given as follows.
Figure 5

ENN Architecture.

Figure 5

ENN Architecture.

Close modal
Figure 6

(a) Location from Google Earth where the investigation was carried out, (b) measurement taken zones.

Figure 6

(a) Location from Google Earth where the investigation was carried out, (b) measurement taken zones.

Close modal
The input layer and the node in this layer is given as:
(1)
where is the throughput data of the i layer. The i layer is connected to the j layer though neurons with weights and bias.
The node in j layer is given as:
(2)
(3)

The sigmoid function, S(x) = 1/1 + ex is used in neural networks to map input values to a range between 0 and 1, which can represent probabilities. It is differentiable and has a simple derivative, S’(x) = S(x)(1 − S(x)).

The i layer and j layer are connected using the neuron with weights and is the neuron weights connecting j layer and c layer. The node in this context layer is given as:
(4)
From Equation (4) α is the feedback gain, which is lies between .The node in this output layer is represented as:
(5)
gives the predicted output of the proposed model. The weight updating of the developed ENN-based predictive model takes place layer-wise, the weight update of joining neuron weight is given as:
(6)
In weight updation, represents the training rate of the o layer. The new weights of is given as:
(7)
In weight updation, represents the training rate of the j layer. The new weights of is given as:
(8)

In weight updation, is the training rate of the input layer.

The developed ENN model is trained using backpropagation technique, an extension of the standard backpropagation algorithm used in feedforward neural networks. The backpropagation technique takes into account the temporal dependencies by unfolding the network over time and adjusting weights accordingly. The propagation mechanism through these layers allows the ENN to continuously refine its predictions, leveraging historical and real-time hydrological data to provide accurate and reliable forecasts of landslide events.

To investigate the performance of the developed ENN-based ML model in predicting landslide deformation, an extensive simulation analysis was carried out in MATLAB. Figure 6(a) shows the Google Earth image of the investigation area. Figure 6(b) highlights the measurement zones, labeled M1, M2, … , M5, where data were collected. The measurements included rainfall, soil moisture, groundwater level, and river streamflow values. These data were gathered using wireless sensors mounted at the specified locations, with data transmission facilitated by IoT devices. The collected data were then preprocessed to handle missing values, normalized to ensure consistent scaling, and used for training and validation of the model.

Figure 7 illustrates the average rainfall observed across the measured zones (M1–M5). The data are depicted over a specific time period, showing variations in rainfall intensity and distribution within the study area. This information is critical for understanding the environmental conditions that influence landslide susceptibility, as higher rainfall levels often correlate with increased landslide risk due to soil saturation and destabilization. Figure 8 displays the average soil moisture content observed across the measured zones (M1–M5). The data ranges from a minimum value of 20% to a maximum value of 35%. Soil moisture plays a critical role in landslide susceptibility, as higher moisture levels increase the likelihood of soil saturation and instability. Understanding these variations helps in assessing the potential risk of landslides in different areas within the study site.
Figure 7

Average rainfall in the measured zones.

Figure 7

Average rainfall in the measured zones.

Close modal
Figure 8

Average soil moisture in the measured zones.

Figure 8

Average soil moisture in the measured zones.

Close modal
Figure 9 shows the minimum and maximum groundwater levels observed in the measured zones (M1–M5). The variability in groundwater levels indicates fluctuations in the subsurface water table, which can significantly affect slope stability. Additionally, Figure 10 depicts the river water streamflow in the measured zones, highlighting the flow rates and volumes over time. The river streamflow data are crucial for understanding the hydrological influences on landslide occurrences, as changes in streamflow can lead to increased erosion and destabilization of slopes.
Figure 9

Min-max groundwater level in the measured zones.

Figure 9

Min-max groundwater level in the measured zones.

Close modal
Figure 10

River water stream flow in the measured zones.

Figure 10

River water stream flow in the measured zones.

Close modal

To process the predictive analysis, initially preprocessing of the datasets was performed. In the preprocessing, missing data points were addressed using interpolation and mean substitution techniques to ensure the completeness of the dataset. Furthermore, data were normalized to ensure all features contributed equally to the model training process. The dataset was split into training and testing sets, typically in a 70:30 ratio, to ensure that the model's performance could be evaluated on unseen data. The training process parameters are listed in Table 3. The ENN model was initialized with a random distribution of input weights and biases. The number of hidden neurons was selected based on cross-validation results to balance complexity and performance. In the training process, input weights and biases were assigned randomly and kept fixed during training, simplifying the training process. The output of the hidden layer was calculated using an activation function, such as the sigmoid or ReLU function. The output weights were computed by minimizing the difference between the predicted and actual displacement values using a least-squares method.

Table 3

ENN predictive training process

UnitInitial valueStopped valueTarget value
Epoch 175 1,000 
Elapsed time (S) – 3.5  
Performance 0.103 0.000216 
Gradient 0.545 0.00435 1 × 10−5 
Validation checks 
UnitInitial valueStopped valueTarget value
Epoch 175 1,000 
Elapsed time (S) – 3.5  
Performance 0.103 0.000216 
Gradient 0.545 0.00435 1 × 10−5 
Validation checks 

The ENN predicted data is given in Figures 1113. Figure 11 depicts the periodic displacement of the landslide mass over a specific period, showing the cyclical nature of landslide movements due to seasonal changes or recurrent triggering events such as rainfall. From the figure it can be observed that the ENN predicts the periodic displacement in line to the reference value. Figure 12 illustrates the residual displacement of the landslide mass, indicating the permanent deformation that remains after triggering events. This figure is crucial for understanding the long-term stability of the slope which clearly indicates the unsteadiness in the residual displacement.
Figure 11

Recurring movements of a landslide mass over time.

Figure 11

Recurring movements of a landslide mass over time.

Close modal
Figure 12

Permanent deformation of a landslide mass over time.

Figure 12

Permanent deformation of a landslide mass over time.

Close modal
Figure 13

Total movement of a landslide mass over a period.

Figure 13

Total movement of a landslide mass over a period.

Close modal

Figure 13 shows the cumulative displacement of the landslide mass, integrating both periodic and residual movements over the observed period. This figure provides a comprehensive view of the overall progression of the landslide predicted using the developed ENN model.

The model was validated using the testing set to evaluate its predictive accuracy. The key performance metrics such as mean squared error (MSE), root mean squared error (RMSE), and R-squared (R²) score were calculated. The metrics for validating the predictive accuracy is listed in Table 4.

Table 4

Accuracy assessment of the developed predictive models

ModelRMSEMAER2F1-ScoreReceiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve
ENN 6.432 5.1468 0.6667 85.2% 0.92 
BPNN 9.7345 12.5430 0.2333 78.7% 0.81 
ModelRMSEMAER2F1-ScoreReceiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve
ENN 6.432 5.1468 0.6667 85.2% 0.92 
BPNN 9.7345 12.5430 0.2333 78.7% 0.81 

The comprehensive analysis presented in this study has significantly advanced our understanding of landslide dynamics by integrating a wide range of environmental factors, including rainfall, soil moisture, groundwater levels, and river streamflow. The use of advanced data collection techniques and ML algorithms has provided a nuanced view of the variables influencing landslides. Specifically, the ENN model has proven to be a robust tool for predicting landslide deformation, as demonstrated by extensive simulation analyses. The performance of the ENN-based model was rigorously evaluated using key metrics: the MSE of 6.432, RMSE of 5.1468, and R² value of 0.6667, which indicate the model's accuracy and fit. Notably, the F1-score of 85% highlights the model's balance between precision and recall, emphasizing its effectiveness in correctly identifying landslides while minimizing false predictions. This comprehensive evaluation confirms that the model can reliably predict landslide occurrences based on hydrological data. The successful application of this model supports the development of effective mitigation strategies and enhances preparedness in regions prone to landslide hazards.

This research is supported by Chongqing Natural Science Foundation (CSTB2023NSCQ-MSX0907) ‘Research on landslide hazard Risk Assessment and Informatization Monitoring and early warning in Wushan Section of Three Gorges Reservoir Area’, The National Natural Science Foundation of China (U22A20600) and Chongqing Graduate Tutor Team Building Project (JDDSTD2022009).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Abdalzaher
M. S.
,
Fouda
M. M.
,
Elsayed
H. A.
&
Salim
M. M.
(
2023
)
Toward secured iot-based smart systems using machine learning
,
IEEE Access
,
11
,
20827
20841
.
Amarasinghe
M. P.
,
Kulathilaka
S. A. S.
,
Robert
D. J.
,
Zhou
A.
&
Jayathissa
H. A. G.
(
2024
)
Risk assessment and management of rainfall-induced landslides in tropical regions: a review
,
Natural Hazards
,
120
(
3
),
2179
2231
.
Barnard
P. L.
,
Owen
L. A.
,
Sharma
M. C.
&
Finkel
R. C.
(
2001
)
Natural and human-induced landsliding in the Garhwal Himalaya of northern India
,
Geomorphology
,
40
(
1–2
),
21
35
.
Cai
W.
,
Lan
F.
,
Huang
X.
,
Hao
J.
,
Xia
W.
,
Tang
R.
,
Feng
P.
&
Li
H.
(
2024
)
Generative probabilistic prediction of precipitation induced landslide deformation with variational autoencoder and gated recurrent unit
,
Frontiers in Earth Science
,
12
,
1394129
.
Chen
T.
,
Shu
J.
,
Han
L.
,
Tovele
G. S.
&
Li
B.
(
2023
)
Landslide mechanism and stability of an open-pit slope: the Manglai open-pit coal mine
,
Frontiers in Earth Science
,
10
,
1038499
.
Chung
S. O.
,
Sudduth
K. A.
,
Motavalli
P. P.
&
Kitchen
N. R.
(
2013
)
Relating mobile sensor soil strength to penetrometer cone index, Soil and Tillage Research, 129, 9–18
.
Fidan
S.
,
Tanyaş
H.
,
Akbaş
A.
,
Lombardo
L.
,
Petley
D. N.
&
Görüm
T.
(
2024
)
Understanding fatal landslides at global scales: a summary of topographic, climatic, and anthropogenic perspectives
,
Natural Hazards
, 7,
1
19
.
Ge
Q.
,
Liu
Z.
,
Wang
X.
,
Wang
X.
&
Sun
H. Y.
(
2024
)
A comparative evaluation of clustering methods and data sampling techniques in the prediction of reservoir landslide deformation state
,
Georisk: Assessment and Management of Risk for Engineered Systems and Geohazards
, 18 (4),
94
970
.
Gupta
H. K.
(
1992
)
Reservoir Induced Earthquakes
.
Amsterdam: Elsevier
.
Huang
F.
,
Yin
K.
,
Zhang
G.
,
Gui
L.
,
Yang
B.
&
Liu
L.
(
2016
)
Landslide displacement prediction using discrete wavelet transform and extreme learning machine based on chaos theory
,
Environmental Earth Sciences
,
75
,
1
18
.
Intrieri
E.
,
Carlà
T.
&
Gigli
G.
(
2019
)
Forecasting the time of failure of landslides at slope-scale: a literature review
,
Earth-science Reviews
,
193
,
333
349
.
Jia
W.
,
Zhao
D.
,
Zheng
Y.
&
Hou
S.
(
2019
)
A novel optimized GA–Elman neural network algorithm
,
Neural Computing and Applications
,
31
,
449
459
.
Jia
W.
,
Wen
T.
,
Li
D.
,
Guo
W.
,
Quan
Z.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Huang
D.
&
Hu
M.
(
2023
)
Landslide displacement prediction of Shuping landslide combining PSO and LSSVM model
,
Water
,
15
(
4
),
612
.
Kitterød
N. O.
,
Kværner
J.
,
Aagaard
P.
,
Arustienė
J.
,
Bikše
J.
,
Dagestad
A.
,
Gundersen
P.
,
Hansen
B.
,
Hjartarson
Á.
,
Karro
E.
&
Klavins
M.
(
2022
)
Hydrogeology and groundwater quality in the Nordic and Baltic countries
,
Hydrology Research
,
53
(
7
),
958
982
.
Liu
Z. Q.
,
Guo
D.
,
Lacasse
S.
,
Li
J. H.
,
Yang
B. B.
&
Choi
J. C.
(
2020
)
Algorithms for intelligent prediction of landslide displacements
,
Journal of Zhejiang University-SCIENCE A
,
21
(
6
),
412
429
.
Lu
M.
,
Tay
L. T.
&
Mohamad-Saleh
J.
(
2024
)
Landslide susceptibility analysis using random forest model with SMOTE-ENN resampling algorithm
,
Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk
,
15
(
1
),
2314565
.
Marino
P.
,
Roman Quintero
D. C.
,
Santonastaso
G. F.
&
Greco
R.
(
2023
)
Prototype of an IoT-based low-cost sensor network for the hydrological monitoring of landslide-prone areas
,
Sensors
,
23
(
4
),
2299
.
Nowicki Jessee
M. A.
,
Hamburger
M. W.
,
Allstadt
K.
,
Wald
D. J.
,
Robeson
S. M.
,
Tanyas
H.
,
Hearne
M.
&
Thompson
E. M.
(
2018
)
A global empirical model for near-real-time assessment of seismically induced landslides
,
Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface
,
123
(
8
),
1835
1859
.
Persichillo
M. G.
,
Bordoni
M.
,
Cavalli
M.
,
Crema
S.
&
Meisina
C.
(
2018
)
The role of human activities on sediment connectivity of shallow landslides
,
Catena
,
160
,
261
274
.
Song
K.
,
Yang
H.
,
Liang
D.
,
Chen
L.
&
Jaboyedoff
M.
(
2024
)
Step-like displacement prediction and failure mechanism analysis of slow-moving reservoir landslide
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
628
,
130588
.
Sreelakshmi
S.
,
Vinod Chandra
S. S.
&
Shaji
E.
(
2022
)
Landslide identification using machine learning techniques: review, motivation, and future prospects
,
Earth Science Informatics
,
15
(
4
),
2063
2090
.
Yin
Y.
,
Huang
B.
,
Wang
W.
,
Wei
Y.
,
Ma
X.
,
Ma
F.
&
Zhao
C.
(
2016
)
Reservoir-induced landslides and risk control in three gorges project on Yangtze River, China
,
Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering
,
8
(
5
),
577
595
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).