A new design methodology recently introduced for looped networks is now applied to branched networks. The methodology is based on cost analysis minimisation, network mathematical simulation under normal and failure states and reliability estimates. It is capable of obtaining not only an adequate value for the global reliability of a network but also the appropiate total design demand. This paper then presents a deeper insight into the comparison between looped and branched networks by applying the methodology to both types of networks and comparing the results in terms of cost and reliability. Considerations regarding available reliability definitions are also included which seem to favor volume-type definitions in practice. Results provide a rational foundation to reveal the superiority of looped networks over comparable branched networks by applying quantitative cost evaluations.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
November 14 2009
Cost and reliability comparison between branched and looped water supply networks
J. B. Martínez
Tel.: +537 260 1416; +537 260 3636 Fax: +537 267 2013; E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Journal of Hydroinformatics (2010) 12 (2): 150–160.
Article history
Received:
October 30 2008
Accepted:
February 25 2009
Citation
J. B. Martínez; Cost and reliability comparison between branched and looped water supply networks. Journal of Hydroinformatics 1 March 2010; 12 (2): 150–160. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2009.080
Download citation file: