A method, the comparison of flow pattern distributions (CFPD), is described in which the specific representation of flow measurements for two different time periods allows a direct, quantitative interpretation of changes in the pattern. Two types of changes can be distinguished. The first is changes from one period to the next in demand consistent with the existing pattern, e.g. due to changing weather or changes in the population size. The second type is inconsistent changes which may be due to increased leakage. The method is successfully applied to drinking water distribution systems of different sizes and characteristics. Being data driven, it is independent of model assumptions and therefore insensitive to uncertainties therein which may hinder some other leakage determination methods. Because it is simple to implement and apply but nevertheless powerful in distinguishing between consistent and inconsistent changes in water demand, the method provides water companies with a way to constantly monitor their networks for possible changes in customer demand and the possible occurrence of new leakages and also check archived data for similar changes. This could render additional information about customer behavior and the evolving condition of the network from data which is usually readily available at water companies.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
July 09 2012
A method for quantitative discrimination in flow pattern evolution of water distribution supply areas with interpretation in terms of demand and leakage
Peter van Thienen
1KWR Watercycle Research Institute, Post Box 1072, 3430 BB Nieuwegein, The Netherlands
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Journal of Hydroinformatics (2013) 15 (1): 86–102.
Article history
Received:
November 02 2011
Accepted:
March 29 2012
Citation
Peter van Thienen; A method for quantitative discrimination in flow pattern evolution of water distribution supply areas with interpretation in terms of demand and leakage. Journal of Hydroinformatics 1 January 2013; 15 (1): 86–102. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2012.171
Download citation file: