In terms of the significance of incorporating smart techniques into large river navigation systems to increase inland navigation competitiveness, this article introduces the development of smart River Information Services (RIS) in Egypt based on smart information and communication technologies as real-time tracking systems, Open Geographic Information Systems, and Nile River Information Systems, as well as proposes measures to tackle the challenges that may be faced, compared with experiences and knowledge of RIS in large river smart navigation systems. This comparison creates new frameworks for the future development of using smart technology in inland waterways in Egypt. It could be concluded that advanced navigation technologies and infrastructures are still being developed in Egypt and are not yet available. Almost all of Egypt's Vessel Traffic Services station equipment and applications are imported from Europe. Undoubtedly, there will be at least a 5- to 10-year time lag for Egypt to develop independent RIS to its full extent. It is necessary to keep good cooperation with the European and Chinese inland sector and refer to their experience and knowledge.

  • Introduce development of Smart River Information Services (RIS) in Egypt based on smart information and communication technology.

  • Propose measures to tackle challenges that may be faced, compared with experience and knowledge of RIS in large river smart navigation systems.

  • Analyze the use of smart technologies and Geographic Information Systems in management of large river navigation system concepts as well as establish a structure to enlighten future research on its implementation along Nile River in Egypt.

Large rivers play an important role in global economies and ecosystems. Because many urban areas are concentrated along the banks of large rivers and deltas, the importance of large rivers to societies is readily apparent (Alexander et al. 2012; United Nations 2019). The global population is estimated to increase by 9.7 billion people by 2050 (United Nations 2018). As the population continues to rise, so will the required goods and services increase (United Nations 2018; World Bank 2018). To accommodate this growth, additional hydraulic infrastructure development will be required. Inland navigation is a rapidly evolving mode of transportation (World Bank 2020). The characteristics of inland waterways have brought about the development of dedicated technological solutions, of which Inland Electronic Chart Display and Information System ECDIS and Inland Electronic Navigation Charts IENC are few examples (Vries 2017). As the difficulties of water-related issues such as water scarcity, navigational bottlenecks, and decaying infrastructure have grown, conventional techniques have gradually revealed their flaws (European Commission 2010). There is a necessity in creating a smart navigation service for controlling the navigation of riverboats, forecasting the situation and giving advice to participants (Nguyen et al. 2018). Smart waterways is a sophisticated navigability monitoring and forecasting system. It relies on sensors mounted on river ships as eco-sounders, collection and processing data unit, a mode1 for forecasting hydrological low-water, and morphological bed-topography and for real-time navigability forecasting techniques (IWAC 2006; Choi et al. 2016). Computer-based Geographical Information Systems (GIS) are increasingly being used to aid in spatial data acquisition, storage, and processing (Christiaan 2011). Recently, IENC was recognized as one of the most advanced navigability monitoring systems in large rivers. Its tenacity is to provide inland navigation safety and efficiency. ECDIS contains all chart information required for safe navigation (Willems 2011; Kamal 2017). Inland navigation systems should be harmonized using the internationally accepted River Information Services (RIS) approach. Rivers in the context of RIS include all types of inland waterways (European Parliament 1996; Gong et al. 2015). It is feasible to determine the levels of navigation safety in crowded seas and rivers, on inland waterways, when approaching routes to ports and berths using the situational strategy based on mathematical statistical approaches (Central Commission 2001). This presented insights into the configuration of these extended navigation-related forecasting services, where communicating prediction uncertainties remains a significant difficulty (Karetnikov et al. 2019). The smart techniques and the use of artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms as different Artificial Neural Network (ANN) algorithms and multiple linear regression could be used for daily streamflow prediction (Meißner et al. 2022). The roadmap for river sustainability is a beacon for foreseeing future river scenarios, a long-term catalyst for environmental sustainability. It is advanced paraphernalia to invest and maximize water resources and to coexist harmoniously (Burgan 2022).

In Brisbane City, Australia, governments used web-based communication and information system tools to deliver relevant water information, as well as to provide early warnings (Batisha 2023). Smart systems based on wireless sensor networks (WSN) represent the next evolutionary development step in engineering, especially in large river applications (John & Ashantha 2012). In Bangladesh, flood and water level monitoring, traffic monitoring, and environmental monitoring are functions of the systems that have much potential to be aided with (WSN), which would lead to the development of a smart environment (Murat & Cevat 2015; Tinggui et al. 2016). Africa's potential for development and economic progress are quite encouraging. Many African nations, like Egypt, are growing their foreign trade, which has increased the demand for an effective and efficient transportation system. In addition, the growth in domestic trade has increased the need for a better transport system that makes the most use of all available means. The first step in socioeconomic engagement is regarded to be transportation. It became crucial for the development of Nile River transportation. The Nile is the world's longest river, with an estimated length of 6,800 km (Al-Sakib et al. 2006). Its basin 2.9 × 106 km2 extends from the equatorial Plato in the south to the Mediterranean Sea in the north, crossing mountain ranges and deserts before flowing into the Nile Delta in Egypt. The Nile is formed by two tributaries, the White Nile and the Blue Nile, and flows through 11 riparian states, including Egypt, Sudan, South Sudan, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Uganda, Kenya, Tanzania, Burundi, Rwanda, and the Democratic Republic of the Congo (Figure 1) (Al-Sakib et al. 2006; Dumont 2009). The White Nile begins in Central Africa's Great Lakes region and flows through Tanzania, Uganda, and South Sudan. The Blue Nile, on the other hand, rises in Ethiopia's highlands and flows southeast into South Sudan and Sudan (Dumont 2009). The two rivers converge near Khartoum, Sudan's capital, and form a confluence. The river then flows through the Sudanese desert to the Egyptian delta (Al-Sakib et al. 2006; Dumont 2009; Mandy 2020).
Figure 1

The Nile River Basin.

Figure 1

The Nile River Basin.

Close modal

This article analyzes and evaluates the use of smart technologies and GIS in the management of large river navigation system concepts, as well as establish a structure, to enlighten future research fields on its implementation and realization along the Nile River in Egypt.

RIS is one of the new concepts, technologies, and solutions designed to foster the further development of the inland waterway (IW) system and encourage cargo transportation. RIS, as previously stated, is formally outlined as a conception for harmonized information services that introduce the suitable assistance of traffic and transport management in inland shipping, as well as interfaces to different modes of transportation (Kamal 2017). RIS integrates with technological innovations in IW transport by relying on modern information and communication technology (ICT) and infrastructures, for example, Inland ECDIS, Inland Automatic Identification System (Inland AIS), Internet Notice to Skipper, Electronic Ship Reporting Information, and cross-border data exchange (ship and cargo) (Willems 2011; Kamal 2017). Recently, technological advancement has allowed for field measurements of rivers, the production of necessary data, and the transition to a new paradigm for river management as RIS (Mandy 2020). A summary of RIS research and significant cases from Serbia that have enormous potential for additional regional investigation has been given (Philippe & Qiang 2022; Puhar 2022). Modern inland navigation using the RIS system can contribute to the improvement of Poland's logistic attractiveness as measured by the logistics performance index (Puhar 2022). RIS is intended to improve the electronic data transfer between the shore and the water by exchanging information in real time and in advance, thereby streamlining traffic and transport procedures in inland navigation (Piotr & Dura 2022). The European Community had improved popular knowledge of the true possibilities of IW transport by the early 1990s. As a result, the development of the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T) would be greatly aided by the interior port and waterway network (Gerhard & Lukas 2012). The RIS Guidelines 2002 were formally endorsed in May 2003 by PIANC, the international organization on ports and waterways, based on the findings of various European research and projects. 2004 saw the adoption of the PIANC Guidelines' amended version (Dolinsek et al. 2013). In 2010, project Fairway Information System (FIS) is a sizable project concerning all of the Dutch inland fairways. The origin of this initiative is the European incentive called RIS, which follows the goal of enabling the expansion of the inland navigation transport sector in a controlled and safe way (Christiaan 2011; Dolinsek et al. 2013). One of the focal points is to use echo-sounders mounted on inland transport vessels as a new source of bed level data, and also to look at predictive water level models (Leitão et al. 2016). RIS used for the Mississippi River is characterized by secure navigation, and it contains inland module displays, where the river electronic charts are used (International commission for the protection of the Danube River 2009; Leitão et al. 2016). Figure 2 depicts how these innovations are organized into a variety of services. Figure 3 shows the methodology flowchart of RIS.
Figure 2

View of RIS.

Figure 3

Methodology flowchart of RIS.

Figure 3

Methodology flowchart of RIS.

Close modal

Three stages of development were identified based on the history of RIS in Europe as a pioneer in smart navigation systems. The first stage had begun before 1998, with an increase in general awareness and knowledge of the true potential of IW transport in the European Community. Legislation in Europe sparked the policies and strategies involved in IW transport. The Inland Navigation Demonstrator for River Information Services (INDRIS) evaluated communication technologies, management procedures, and information services for the first time between 1998 and 2004, presenting the concept of RIS for the first time (Willems 2011). PIANC (the internationa1 organization for Ports and Waterways) developed the RIS Guidelines in 2002, which were formally adopted in May 2004. From 2004 to the present, obligated fundamentals for data communication and RIS equipment, as well as the minimum level of services for future RIS implementations, have been defined, which has the structure and framework for the deployment of harmonized RIS all over Europe (Administrative Tribunal 2001; Willems 2011). It is challenging to anticipate river flows accurately because of the stochastic and complicated character of streamflow in the basins; in recent years, AI and machine learning techniques have gained popularity for stream flow predictions (Karim et al. 2022; Ibrahim et al. 2023). Smart systems and more detailed bed level information for transport vessel captains could improve IW safety, and as a result, navigation will be easier. Maneuvering difficulties in inland waterways can be caused by width restrictions, particularly in bends, and depth restrictions, particularly in upright parts of the cross-section (Weijun et al. 2011). Investments in smart transportation infrastructure, on the other hand, indicate political importance: Between 1992 and 2011, the Chinese investment reached 8.5% of its GDP in water infrastructure.

In contrast, Europe invested 2.6% of its GDP in water infrastructure. In Brazil, investments in waterway infrastructure are a minor priority. In general, Latin America spent only 1.8% of its GDP on infrastructure (Paul et al. 2009; Weijun et al. 2011). The overall goal of the ‘Smart Waterways’ operational monitoring and forecast system is to improve IW navigational safety, enable more cost-effective cargo transportation, and promote inland water transport in an environmentally conscious manner.

BOS-Baggeren is essentially a GIS database that gives the user online access to a hydraulic map including data on bed level soundings and low-water depths, thus giving regional, graphical information on allowable cargo loads. By this way, it can be considered a precursor of smart waterways using GIS. Every two weeks, the bed level survey is conducted as a routine activity over the entire river section of the Waal. This routine management sounding is principally motivated by (RWS ON) to check the river dredger's performance (International commission for the protection of the Danube River 2009). Applications of GIS and remote sensing technologies have increased dramatically since the mid-1980s (Meaden & Kapetsky 1991; Meaden 2009). GIS and remote sensing applications in inland waterways have been studied, particularly as they relate to spatial decision-making (Meaden & Kapetsky 1991). GIS has been widely applied to navigation systems, and in the United States, there have been fewer applications of these technologies in inland waterways management and planning. Smart navigation-based GIS is increasingly being used in order to assist in the process of capturing spatial data, processing relevant information, and making this information available as required. The use of GIS, therefore, has great potential to optimize the value of information as a resource for navigation.

Nile River in Egypt

The Nile River was crucial in the establishment of Egypt as an ancient superpower, and its contribution was unrivalled in social, religious, and political dimensions. The rise of the Nile as a culture of significance, dominance, and prosperity was a direct result of river's geographical location and how its residents used the available resources to establish a great civilization. The 1959 Nile Waters Agreement with Sudan allocated 55.5 billion cubic meters per year to Egypt (Raslan & Abdelbary 2001). The Aswan High Dam is the major storage and regulatory facility on the Nile. It began its operation in 1968, ensuring Egypt's control over annual flood waters and guiding their utilization. From Aswan High Dam to Cairo, the Nile flows for approximately 950 km through Egypt. The Nile is then divided into two branches, which are approximately 200 km long and eventually reach the Mediterranean Sea. The Aswan High Dam provides great control on the flow discharge. Throughout its course, the Nile is well controlled by barrages and locks (River Transport Authority 2019). From Aswan to Cairo, the Nile is divided into four reaches by four main barrages, each with a navigational lock that controls water level and discharge. Over a distance of 1250 km, the total drop in the bed level from Aswan to the Mediterranean is about 80 m (River Transport Authority 2019). The Nile, as a result, has a gentle slope and is a low-energy river with controlled discharge and water level. Navigation can be improved as a result of these facts.

The significance of Nile navigation in Egypt

The rapid increase in cargo transportation traffic in Egypt saw cargo transported grow by 487.4 million tons over 28 years (from 82 to 570 million tons in the period 1979– 2007) and is expected to hit 700 million tons by the end of 2019 (River Transport Authority 2020). Table 1 depicts the cargo transportation rate in Egypt's three distinct modes of transportation. It can be seen that the maximum rate for cargo transportation is the roadway with a 95.7% in 2002, while the minimum cargo transportation rate is IW with a percentage of 0.64% (River Transport Authority 2020). As a result, Nile River navigation development is critical for reducing the burden on road transportation as a result of the massive increase in population, as well as for reducing motorway congestion and lowering transportation costs (Ibrahim 1984; River Transport Authority 2019). Approximately 3 million tons of cargo are transported annually across the Nile River between A1exandria, Damietta, Cairo, and Aswan, to reach 6 million tons in 2019 (River Transport Authority 2019), as shown in Figure 4. When the RIS project and its infrastructure across the Nile are completed, this transport rate is expected to skyrocket (River Transport Authority 2020).
Table 1

Cargo transportation types (River Transport Authority 2020)

No.Transport typeYear197519791987199220002002
1 Roadway trucks Total weight (106 tons) 58.3 73.3 154.1 165.5 300.2 312.8 
82.9 88.7 91.9 92.8 95.5 95.7 
2 Rail ways Total weight (106 tons) 7.8 5.1 6.9 9.6 11.9 12.1 
11.1 6.2 4.1 5.4 3.8 3.7 
3 Inland barges Total weight (106 tons) 4.2 4.2 6.7 3.2 2.2 2.1 
6.0 5.1 4.0 1.8 0.7 0.64 
Total transported weight (106tons) 70.3 82.6 167.7 178.3 314.3 327.0 
No.Transport typeYear197519791987199220002002
1 Roadway trucks Total weight (106 tons) 58.3 73.3 154.1 165.5 300.2 312.8 
82.9 88.7 91.9 92.8 95.5 95.7 
2 Rail ways Total weight (106 tons) 7.8 5.1 6.9 9.6 11.9 12.1 
11.1 6.2 4.1 5.4 3.8 3.7 
3 Inland barges Total weight (106 tons) 4.2 4.2 6.7 3.2 2.2 2.1 
6.0 5.1 4.0 1.8 0.7 0.64 
Total transported weight (106tons) 70.3 82.6 167.7 178.3 314.3 327.0 
Figure 4

Cargo transport over the Nile River Waterway between 2015 and 2019 (5 years) (River Transport Authority 2020).

Figure 4

Cargo transport over the Nile River Waterway between 2015 and 2019 (5 years) (River Transport Authority 2020).

Close modal

The road system is currently well developed and improving, owing to the fact that road investment remains higher than IW navigation. New routes will be proposed, a permanent navigation channel will be established, and night navigation will be secured as a result of increased investment in navigation. Using and developing smart navigation systems, the overall scheme of navigation development will improve the performance of inland navigation.

The present Nile navigational waterways and locks in Egypt

Throughout history, Egypt has regarded the Nile as a navigable channel. It is used for irrigation and agriculture and used in transporting people and goods through navigational waterways. The Nile River and its branches run for about 1,500 km through Egypt (River Transport Authority 2020). The waterway connecting Greater Cairo and the Alexandria port has become the main Delta River transportation corridor. With a cargo capacity of 700,000 tons per year, it accounts for roughly 23% of Egypt's total river transportation (River Transport Authority 2019). Furthermore, the Damietta branch connects Cairo to the Mediterranean Seaports of Damietta and Port Said, and serves as a vital cargo corridor. The length of this navigable waterway is 242 km between Cairo and Damietta. This waterway is characterized by three locks (Delta, Zefta, and Damietta) (River Transport Authority 2020). The canal system (Beheri and Noubaria canals), which was built nearly 27 years ago, is the other waterway in the Delta. Both private and public inland barges use this canal system, which connects the port of Alexandria to the Delta Barrage (River Transport Authority 2020). The Cairo–Aswan Waterway is the most prominent navigational route for navigational units and tourism cruises all year, particularly between Aswan and Luxor. The length of this route is 953 km, it permits navigation in both directions, and it can be used up and down (River Transport Authority 2019, 2020). The Aswan–Wadi Halfa waterway is characterized by the length of 350 km – 300 km inside the Egyptian border and 50 km inside the Sudanese border. There are no bridges or locks in this waterway (River Transport Authority 2019, 2020). It serves the transportation of passengers and goods between the ports of the High Dam in Aswan and Wadi Halfa in Sudan (River Transport Authority 2019). This navigational waterway allows navigation in both directions, it can be used up and down, and equipped with navigational aids from floating buoys and fixed towers (40 fixed towers and 58 floating buoys), powered by solar energy as shown in Figure 5 (River Transport Authority 2020). Figure 6 shows Egypt's main navigational waterways.
Figure 5

The main navigational waterways in Egypt (River Transport Authority 2020).

Figure 5

The main navigational waterways in Egypt (River Transport Authority 2020).

Close modal
Figure 6

Navigational aids (floating buoys and fixed towers).

Figure 6

Navigational aids (floating buoys and fixed towers).

Close modal
Egypt's Nile River lock network is shown in Figure 6. The Nile navigational waterways are covered by fifteen locks (River Transport Authority 2019, 2020). The Ministry of Water Resources and Irrigation (MWRI) controls five locks (Beheiry Rayah, Damietta, Assuit, Nag Hammai, and Esna), while the River Transport Authority (RTA) controls 10 (El Maleh El Kabeer, El Maleh El Sagher, old km 100, new km 100, km 61, km 28.5, Bolin, El Khataba, Delta, and Zefta) (River Transport Authority 2019, 2020). The author discovered that Delta lock is controlled by control panel technology during a visit there. Figure 7 depicts an onsite panel console that controls each gate. The lock at new km 100 is also controlled by the same technology.
Figure 7

Delta Lock controlled by control panel technology on-site (the author visit).

Figure 7

Delta Lock controlled by control panel technology on-site (the author visit).

Close modal

Classification of Egypt's inland waterways

Egypt's inland waterways can be classified into two main categories: the Nile River and the man-made canals. Along with the River Nile, a vast network of constructed canals of various sizes also exists. There is a sizable network of inland waterways in Egypt. The majority of the country is covered by its branches. Egypt's IWs network involves a set of waterways classified into three classes (River Transport Authority 2019, 2020). This classification is based on the width of the waterway, the Air Clearance, and the water depth (River Transport Authority 2019). Egypt's three most important waterways are included in the first-class IWs network: 953 km (from Cairo to Aswan), 220 km (from Cairo to Alexandria), and 242 km (from Cairo to Damietta). The second-class waterway includes El Khandal/El Sharki Canal, Tanta Navigation Canal, and Port Said/El Matareya. Among the third-class waterways are the El Mahmoudia Canal, El Bagouria Canal, Bahr Shibeen, and Damietta Bra/Shebin River, El Mansoria/El Tawfike Canals and Damietta/El Matareya in the Nile Delta area, and Ibrahimia Canal and Bahr Youssef in the Nile Valley area (River Transport Authority 2019).

RTA mandates the standards. However, they may be updated in the event of an upgrade of the necessary structures or modernization of fleet dimensions or transportation style to be efficient (Saber 2011; River Transport Authority 2019, 2020). Table 2 presents the classification of Egypt's IWs (River Transport Authority 2020).

Table 2

Egypt's inland waterways classification (Saber 2011; Radwan 2020; River Transport Authority 2020)

Item\categoryWaterway classification
1st class
2nd class3rd class
The NileMain Canal
Min. air clearance below structure (bridges) (m) 13 3.5 2.5 
Min. navigation vent width (m) 35 12 
Max. draft (m) 1.8 1.5 1.0 
Min. water depth (m) 2.5 1.8 1.25 
Item\categoryWaterway classification
1st class
2nd class3rd class
The NileMain Canal
Min. air clearance below structure (bridges) (m) 13 3.5 2.5 
Min. navigation vent width (m) 35 12 
Max. draft (m) 1.8 1.5 1.0 
Min. water depth (m) 2.5 1.8 1.25 

The Nile River fleet

The river fleet is split into two parts: cargo transport and tourist fleet. As per 1989 figures, there were approximately 1,300 barge units in operation. In 1992, on the other hand, there were 113 hotel boats. These hotel boats normally travel between Aswan and Luxor, making several stops at historic sites along the Nile (Saber 2011). As per the River Transport Authority (2019) report and the JICA Study Report from 2003, the total number of cargo boats fleet is 2,492 unit, and the total number of tourist boats is 364 boats (floating hotels) (Saber 2011; Radwan 2020). There are also a few hotel boats that run from Cairo to Aswan during the peak season of November to February, as well as a number of boats cruising the Nile as restaurants and sightseeing in Cairo.

In Egypt, many actions have been taken in the past to attain the most suited and safe navigation path on the Nile River day and night, as the Radio Communication system, VHF channel 12, was available on RTA vessels. For security considerations, communication between Nile Cruise Ships has been limited to a single channel under the control of the Ministry of Interior (Kamal 2017). The Bathymetry Charts production project was then completed, which is a 1:10,000 scale chart. There is no indication of water depths on these charts. All heights on these maps are according to Alexandria's Lowest Water Spring in the Mediterranean Sea. From 2003 to 2010, the (X-Y-Z) data have been utilized to create contour maps with 0.5 m intervals. The chart was 70 × 50 cm in size, with a 1:15,000 scale. Firm paper has been used, allowing for repeated markings and subsequent erasures without tampering with the image (Kamal 2017). At present, RTA is carrying out three projects that fall under the category of routine infrastructure improvements, such as dredging, constructing new locks, and establishing or upgrading navigational aids (River Transport Authority 2020). Furthermore, RIS is being investigated as a modernized IT infrastructure between Cairo/Aswan IW on the Nile mainstream. These projects concentrated on major IWs such as Alexandria–Cairo, Damietta/Cairo, and Cairo/Aswan. Furthermore, while these three projects are self-funded by the Egyptian government, the rest are loan projects supported by Austrian government funds and technology transfer (Ibrahim 1984; River Transport Authority 2020). RTA is gradually putting navigational aids like buoys, signs, and beacons on navigable waterways such as the Aswan–Cairo, Alexandria–Cairo, and Damietta–Cairo IWs. According to RTA, the installation of navigational aids is currently complete for the Aswan–Cairo IW and the Alexandria–Cairo IW, with the Damietta–Cairo IW installation and implementation set to begin. The extent of the damage to some navigational aids installed along the Aswan–Cairo IW is currently reported to be missing or stolen. In addition, some navigation aids on the Nile have been covered and disappeared by natural weeds, as seen in Figure 8.
Figure 8

Navigation aids covered by Nile natural weeds.

Figure 8

Navigation aids covered by Nile natural weeds.

Close modal

The cargo flow that through Egypt has never been lower than it is today. These are the main causes:

  • 1.

    Inadequate use of smart and new technology for safe navigation in navigable channels.

  • 2.

    Transportation takes a long time due to only using daylight navigation.

  • 3.

    The inability to operate second- and third-class navigational waterways due to a lack of maintenance and the construction of low-height bridges over them.

  • 4.

    The absence of navigational aids is a major cause of vessel accidents and sinking barges.

  • 5.

    Management's inability to improve service quality.

  • 6.

    There is no coordination of door-to-door cargo delivery, which reduces the use of river waterways by companies and investors.

As a result, the goals for the development of inland water transport can be identified as introducing competitive river transport in comparison to other modes of transportation and encouraging ‘door-to-door,’ as well as developing and fully implementing smart navigation systems such as RIS.

A sophisticated information and communication technology enables the expansion of IW transportation opportunities while also ensuring the safety and efficiency of waterway users. The system acts as a link (interface) between the public and private sectors involved in IW transportation. RIS is estimated to assist with IWT organization and management. The RIS project includes AIS-based communication systems as well as a sophisticated Tracking and Tracing System with a DGPS Network. This will be the first RIS Project in the Arabic world as well as on the African continent.

The RTA, in partnership with the Austrian Via-Donna (the consultant), has set the technical requirements and studies necessary for the development of RIS over the Nile River in Egypt (Ibrahim 1984; River Transport Authority 2020). These requirements include:

  • 1.

    Producing Inland Electronic Navigation Charts (IENC) for the navigational path from Aswan to Delta barrage.

  • 2.

    Developing a Traffic monitoring system

  • 3.

    Developing a control center, to communicate and control the movement of river units.

In 2013, the Installation Process of thirteen AIS devices was applied to tourism units. In 2016, RTA installed VHF radio station equipment (River Transport Authority 2020). In 2018, a number of BEACON stations were installed in the Cairo region.

Proposed Nile RIS modules

Nile RIS has been proposed with the intention to build smart navigation system along the Nile River. It contains four main modules as illustrated in Figure 9, and the flowchart is shown in Figure 10:
  • 1.

    Ship segment: This generates and exchanges traffic information for its own and other vessels via inland AIS transponders and shore segment base stations within AIS coverage. Furthermore, it enables the display of traffic information via Inland ECDIS viewers.

  • 2.

    Shore segment: This receives and stores traffic information from vessels within the Inland AIS base station's AIS coverage and sends it to the operator segment.

  • 3.

    Operator segment: This receives static and traffic information from vessels within the AIS coverage of the shore segment's base stations, stores it in the database server, and provides this information to the government for national and international traffic data exchangeable.

  • 4.

    External segment: It is the user or Government (Authorities) segment that displays actual and historic static and traffic data of vessels within AIS coverage as the traffic image for the authorities via the Inland ECDIS Viewer.

Figure 9

Egypt's proposed Nile RIS project's component parts.

Figure 9

Egypt's proposed Nile RIS project's component parts.

Close modal
Figure 10

Egypt's proposed Nile RIS project's flowchart.

Figure 10

Egypt's proposed Nile RIS project's flowchart.

Close modal

In Table 3, the numbers for Europe, China, the United States, Brazil, and Egypt differ significantly: China has the longest available waterways, the highest transported volume, and the highest volume handled in ports compared to other IWs in large rivers for other countries. As clear, China's in1and waterway system is roughly equivalent to that of Europe, the United States, Brazil, and Egypt combined, but it also has an additional 37,000 km of c1assified navigable waterways (European Commission 2005), many of which already carry more than 3 million tons annually using small vessels. No doubt that the market conditions vary by region. Transport demand in China is growing more than four times faster than in Europe or the US and of course faster than in Brazil and Egypt.

Table 3

Comparison between Europe, China, the United States, Brazil, and Egypt waterways characteristics (European Commission 2005; World Bank 2018; Kamal 2019; River Transport Authority 2020; Moustafa et al. 2022)

EuropeChinaThe United StatesBrazilEgypt
Lengths of waterways that are available (km) 40,000 64,668a 41,038 5,000 1,767 
A vital waterway in the area Rhine-Main-Danube Yangtze River Mississippi-Missouri Amazon Nile 
Waterway width (mile) 0.02 0.5 11–20 2–30 0.02 
Waterway depth (feet) 30 10–40 10–20 66–160 10–36 
Flow at mouth (cubic m per second) 6,245 35,000 17,545 180,000 1,584 
Sediment discharge increasing/decreasing Decreasing Decreasing Decreasing Increasing Decreasing 
Reason for increase/decrease in discharge and other comments Reservoirs trapping sediment Due to dam construction and land-use change Levees, reservoirs trapping sediment Due to stronger erosion processes caused either by rainfall, or land cover change or both Aswan Dam trapping sediment upstream 
Goods transported Construction material dry and solid cargo Construction material dry and solid cargo Construction material dry and solid cargo Mostly agricultural and metal goods Dry & Yields cargo, construction material 
Total volume transported on waterways (million tons) 551 1,180 578 45 
The average barge capacity (tons) 1,000–1,360 1,000–5,000 1,300–2,150 1,000–1,300 300–400 
Important inland ports in region Duisport Chongqing South Louisiana Manaus Alexandria 
Volume handled in ports (million tons) 131 1,100 275.5 11.8 33.6 
Intensity of inland navigation High High High Low Low 
The significance and priority of inland navigation in the region High priority High priority High priority Low priority Low (for Cargo)
High (for Tourist) 
The share of inland waterway transport 6.5% (2018) 24% (2013) 8.3% (2011) 14% (2010) 1% (2019) 
Smart inland navigation systems Pioneer of RIS (high level) RIS (PIANC) (high level) RIS (PIANC) (high level) Frist level of RIS Frist level of RIS 
EuropeChinaThe United StatesBrazilEgypt
Lengths of waterways that are available (km) 40,000 64,668a 41,038 5,000 1,767 
A vital waterway in the area Rhine-Main-Danube Yangtze River Mississippi-Missouri Amazon Nile 
Waterway width (mile) 0.02 0.5 11–20 2–30 0.02 
Waterway depth (feet) 30 10–40 10–20 66–160 10–36 
Flow at mouth (cubic m per second) 6,245 35,000 17,545 180,000 1,584 
Sediment discharge increasing/decreasing Decreasing Decreasing Decreasing Increasing Decreasing 
Reason for increase/decrease in discharge and other comments Reservoirs trapping sediment Due to dam construction and land-use change Levees, reservoirs trapping sediment Due to stronger erosion processes caused either by rainfall, or land cover change or both Aswan Dam trapping sediment upstream 
Goods transported Construction material dry and solid cargo Construction material dry and solid cargo Construction material dry and solid cargo Mostly agricultural and metal goods Dry & Yields cargo, construction material 
Total volume transported on waterways (million tons) 551 1,180 578 45 
The average barge capacity (tons) 1,000–1,360 1,000–5,000 1,300–2,150 1,000–1,300 300–400 
Important inland ports in region Duisport Chongqing South Louisiana Manaus Alexandria 
Volume handled in ports (million tons) 131 1,100 275.5 11.8 33.6 
Intensity of inland navigation High High High Low Low 
The significance and priority of inland navigation in the region High priority High priority High priority Low priority Low (for Cargo)
High (for Tourist) 
The share of inland waterway transport 6.5% (2018) 24% (2013) 8.3% (2011) 14% (2010) 1% (2019) 
Smart inland navigation systems Pioneer of RIS (high level) RIS (PIANC) (high level) RIS (PIANC) (high level) Frist level of RIS Frist level of RIS 

aAn additional 62,000 km navigable but unclassified.

Despite the fact that Brazi1 has more available and widest waterways than Europe, European IWs transport approximately 12 times more volume. It can be noted that Egypt has the lowest available waterways, as well as the lowest transported volume, narrowest width, and more volume handled in ports compared to Brazil. Furthermore, the sediment discharge in the Nile River in Egypt decreased due to the construction of the Aswan High Dam, which has virtually cutoff sediment transport and deposition to downstream areas by trapping vast quantities of sediment. On the contrary, in Brazil, stronger erosion processes caused by increased rainfall, altered land cover, or both increased the amount of sediment discharged into the Amazon River. It becomes obvious that each river basin has a very different sediment load and erosion characteristics. However, the sediment discharge decreased in Europe, China, and the United States as in Egypt.

These distinctions can be seen in relation to the importance of inland navigation in various countries. In Europe and China, IWs are regarded as important modes of transportation, and various measures are in place to promote their use. Advertising acts, in addition to financial assistance, are examples of such measures. In using smart inland navigation systems, Europe can be considered a pioneer in using RIS, followed by China and the United States. Egypt and Brazil are still developing the first level of RIS. In this case, investments in waterway infrastructure can be considered as a primary key to ensure inland navigation's competitiveness.

RIS is an integration of management and infrastructures and has originated from the modernization of the inland shipping industry. The multiplicity of RIS services necessitates an advanced level of interoperability and compatibility of the services themselves, as well as the enabling technologies and processes that support them. Due to the lag between the Egyptian inland shipping industry and the other ones especially the European and Chinese, RIS is a new concept to the Egyptian inland shipping sector. Obviously, the European Union and China's knowledge and experience achieved in RIS research and development will be beneficial in awakening general awareness in the sector and improving the quality and reliability of the IW network in Egypt. It should be noted that much of the investment and focus in the European, Chinese, and United States IW systems is on the use of new technologies, such as RIS, river obstruction removal, dam and lock construction, and canal creation. It should be emphasized that Egypt's share of IW transport is 1%, compared to 6.5, 24, 8.3, and 14% for Europe, China, the United States, and Brazil, respectively. This demonstrated the gap between these countries and Egypt, notably in terms of RIS use (Jiang & Luo 2019; Moustafa et al. 2022; Fahmy & Hekal 2023).

Egypt faces numerous challenges that must be overcome to maximize the benefits of RIS implementation. The most significant of these challenges is the organizational aspect, which is the real challenge in implementing RIS in Egypt. The development of RIS in Egypt will be hampered by some complicated relationships and overlapping functions between organizations. For example, two authorities, RTA and MWRI, coordinate operations and development of locks along the navigational waterways, in addition to the lack of use of the same technology for all locks. Furthermore, three authorities, RTA, MWRI, and localities, are responsible for the licensing of river transport units, as well as their safety and validity conditions and specifications. Taking the combination of these into consideration, it will be difficult to design RIS architecture and collect accurate data to support RIS. Furthermore, compared to the more advanced regions in Europe, China, and the United States, the inland shipping industry in Egypt is still in a relatively early stage of growth. Egypt's current inland shipping is characterized by a high proportion of old and small vessels. In addition to these challenges, there is also the lack of innovation in advanced navigation technologies. In RIS, inland ECDIS is a critical modem navigation technology. Because inland ECDIS can display geo-related information with the overlays of AIS and Radar images it is widely used in Vessel Traffic Services (VTS) and FIS. In Egypt, these advanced navigation technologies and infrastructures are still being developed in Egypt and are not yet available. Almost all of Egypt's VTS station equipment and applications are imported from Europe (River Transport Authority 2020). Undoubtedly there will be at least 5- to 10-year time lag for Egypt to develop independent RIS to its full extent. It is necessary to keep good cooperation with the European inland sector and refer to their experience and knowledge. Independent development research with innovative ideas, on the other hand, is in high demand.

No doubt that the knowledge and experience gained in RIS research and development by Europe, China, and the United States will be beneficial in raising general awareness in the sector and improving the quality and reliability of Egypt's IW network.

In Egypt, there has been a growing demand in recent years to improve inland navigation transport. Aiming to promote awareness using the smart navigation systems in large rivers, this article introduces the development of smart RIS in Egypt based on smart ICT, as well as proposes measures to tackle the challenges that may be faced, compared with the experiences and knowledge of RIS in large river smart navigation systems with possible solutions to developing RIS in Egypt. By highlighting the novelty of my system, the main goal is to establish a competitive river transport system compared to traditional modes like roadways and railways, by emphasizing ‘door-to-door’ connectivity and implementing advanced smart navigation systems such as RIS. This approach not only enhances the efficiency of cargo transportation but also positions inland water transport as an attractive option for potential investors.

It is strongly recommended to develop an action plan to build Nile RIS in Egypt as quickly and effectively as possible as follows: establishment smart RIS modules that cover all Nile River reaches in Egypt, staff qualification and training for supervisory and coordination roles in RIS control centers and stations, resolve overlapping organizational functions to collect accurate data to support RIS, and collaboration between research and organizations. Sustainable financing support is necessary throughout the development of RIS modules. It is essential that the government should take a leading role in this development, and finally, the independent research of development with innovative ideas is highly demanded.

From the point view of navigation technology, the followings are suggested for Egypt's RIS system development: start the development of some independent work packages or modules of applications in advance depending on new technologies for using real-time technology, open GIS and its application for smart rivers, in addition to using the Nile Information System NRIS developed by the author in providing information about Nile structures and projects (Piotr & Dura 2022), and develop a new smart and economic navigation system for the Nile River in Egypt based on information and communication technologies as real-time tracking systems for navigational depths via GPS devices attached to the navigational unit, allowing the navigational unit's skipper to identify the navigational path and safe navigable areas.

It is recommended to require RTA to introduce a time plan for implementing RIS along the Nile River in Egypt. In addition to including a part in their plans in their semi-annual reports, stating what actions they intend to take during the plan period is necessary to improve navigation management efficiency and effectiveness in using the smart technology in administration, lock management and development, dredging, and navigation aid maintenance. Smart technology as RIS will improve the utilization of navigation infrastructure, vessel productivity, and navigation safety. It can also improve the statistics used to populate Egypt's navigation data base. As a result, it is recommended that the RIS be implemented as a high priority, including ongoing communication with professionals working in comparable programs around the world.

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Administrative Tribunal
2001
Central Commission for the Navigation of the Rhine (CCNR)
.
Council of Europe
.
Alexander
J.
,
Wilson
R.
&
Green
W.
2012
A brief history and summary of the effects of river engineering and dams on the Mississippi River system and delta
.
U.S. Geological Survey Circular
1375
(
3
),
43
.
Al-Sakib
K.
,
Choong
S.
&
Hyung-Woo
L.
2006
Smartening the Environment Using Wireless Sensor Networks in A Developing Country
, Vol.
89
.
ICACT
, Phoenix Park, Korea. pp.
20
22
.
ISBN 89-5519-129-4
.
Batisha
A.
2023
A lighthouse to enhance the quality of life in the Nile River basin
.
Environmental Economics and Policy Studies
,
1
29
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10018-023-00380-2
.
Burgan
H. I.
2022
Comparison of different ANN (FFBP GRNN F) algorithms and multiple linear regression for daily streamflow prediction in Kocasu River-Turkey
.
Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
31
(
5
),
4699
4708
.
Central Commission for the Navigation on the Rhine
2001
Inland ECDIS Standard
.
European Union (EU)
Choi
G.
,
Chong
K.
,
Kim
S.
&
Ryu
A.
2016
SWMI: New paradigm of water resources management for SDGs
.
Smart Water
1
(
1
),
3
.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40713-016-0002-6
.
Christiaan
E.
2011
Definition study of Smart Waterways, Deltares
.
Dumont, H. J. 2009 A Description of the Nile Basin, and a Synopsis of Its History, Ecology, Biogeography, Hydrology, and Natural Resources. The Nile: Origin, environments, limnology and human use, The Nile. Monographiae Biologicae, vol 89. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9726-3_1
.
Dolinsek
M.
,
Hartl
S.
,
Hartl
T.
,
Hintergräber
B.
,
Hofbauer
V.
,
Hrusovsky
M.
,
Maierbrugger
G.
,
Matzner
B.
,
Putz
L.-M.
&
Sattler
M.
2013
Manual on Danube Navigation
, 2nd edn.
via donau – Österreichische Wasserstraßen-Gesellschaft mbH
,
Vienna, Austria
.
ISBN 978-3-9502226-2-3
.
European Commission
2005
White Paper: European Policy for 2010: Time to Decide
.
Directorate-General Energy and Transport
.
European Commission
2010
River Information Services (RIS), Multi-Annual Call
.
Brussels.
European Parliament
1996
The Decision No.1692/96/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on Community guidelines for the development of the Trans-European network (TEN)
.
Official Journal L
228
,
1104
.
Fahmy
W.
&
Hekal
N.
2023
Floating hotel docking situation assessment between Aswan and Luxor, Egypt
.
Journal of Advanced Engineering Trends
42
,
1
.
Gerhard
S.
&
Lukas
S.
2012
Use of ITS technologies for multimodal transport operations – river information services (RIS) transport logistics services
.
Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences
48
,
622
631
.
doi:10.1016/j.sbspro
.
Ibrahim
A. M.
1984
The Nile: Description, hydrology, control and utilization
.
Hydrobiologia
110
,
1
13
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00025770
.
Ibrahim
K.
,
Yuk
F.
,
Ahmed
N. A.
,
ChaiHoon
K.
&
Ahmed
E.
2023
Forecasting multi-step-ahead reservoir monthly and daily inflow using machine learning models based on different scenarios
.
Applied Intelligence Journal
53
,
10893
10916
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10489-022-04029-7
.
International commission for the protection of the Danube River, ICPDR
2009
The Danube River Basin. Facts and Figures
.
IWAC
2006
The Inland Waterways of England and Wales
.
England
.
Jiang
L.
&
Luo
Y.
2019
Research on optimization of crude oil transportation development system in the Yangtze River based on transportation capacity regulation
.
Journal of Physics: Conference Series
1168
,
022065
.
IOP Publishing. doi:10.1088/1742-6596/1168/2/022065
.
John
H.
&
Ashantha
G.
2012
Building Community Resilience _Learning from the 2011 Floods in Southeast Queensland, Australia
. In
Proceedings of the Disaster Management 2012: The 8th Annual Conference of International Institute for Infrastructure, Renewal and Reconstruction (IIIRR 2012)
.
Kumamoto University
,
Japan
, pp.
51
56
.
Kamal
N.
2017
Inland electronic navigation charts for enhancing the efficiency of navigational waterway in the Nile River Case Study- El-Wasta Reach
.
International Water Technology Journal
7
,
4
.
Kamal
N.
2019
Design of GIS-based Nile river information system
.
IOSR Journal of Engineering (IOSRJEN)
9
(
10
),
56
67
.
Karetnikov
V.
,
Prokhorenkov
A.
&
Efimov
K.
2019
Improving the quality of navigation and hydrographic support in the Arctic rivers estuarine waterways
.
IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science
378
,
012089
.
doi:10.1088/1755-1315/378/1/012089
.
Karim
I.
,
Yuk
F.
,
Ahmed
N. A.
,
ChaiHoon
K.
&
Ahmed
E.
2022
A review of the hybrid artificial intelligence and optimization modelling of hydrological streamflow forecasting
.
Alexandria Engineering Journal
61
(
1
),
279
303
.
Meaden
G. J.
2009
Geographical Information Systems (GIS) in Fisheries Management and Research
. In:
Computers in Fisheries Research
.
Springer
, pp.
4
6
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-8636-6_4
.
Meaden
G. J.
&
Kapetsky
J. M.
1991
Geographical information systems and remote sensing in inland fisheries and waterway
. In:
Inland Water Resources and Aquaculture Service
.
(Meaden, G. J. & Manjarrez, J. A., eds.)
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy
.
ISBN 92-5-103052-9
.
Moustafa
M.
,
Kamar
L. B.
,
Harigy
O. A.
&
Yehia
A. W.
2022
Sensitivity analysis of inland water transport systems in Egypt
.
Port Said Engineering Research Journal
62
(
3
),
62
73
.
Murat
D.
&
Cevat
B.
2015
Smart technologies with wireless sensor networks
.
Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences
195
,
1915
1921
.
doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.06.202
.
Nguyen
K.
,
Stewart
R.
,
Zhang
H.
,
Sahin
O.
&
Siriwardene
N.
2018
Re-engineering traditional urban water management practices with smart metering and informatics
.
Environmental Modelling & Software
101
,
256
267
.
doi:10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.12.015
.
Paul
A.
,
Jia
D.
,
Ning
T.
,
Sun
J.
&
Fei
W.
2009
Sustainable Development of Inland Waterway Transport in China
.
World Bank Project: Comprehensive Transport System Analysis in China – P109989
,
China
.
Philippe
G. B
, . &
Qiang
M.
2022
Smart river management: What is next?
River Journal
.
Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/rvr2.13
.
Piotr
D.
&
Dura
J. N.
2022
River information services (RIS) as a tool to improve Poland's position in the European logistic system
.
European Research Studies Journal
2
,
247
260
.
PIANC, RIS Guidelines 2002. Report No. 121. Guidelines and Recommendations for River Information Services.
Puhar
D.
2022
River information systems–review, applications, and current examples from Serbia
.
Researches Review DGTH
51
(
1
),
25
38
.
doi:10.5937/ZbDght2201025P
.
Radwan
G. A.
2020
Water resources in Egypt and their challenges, Lake Nasser case study
.
The Egyptian Journal of Aquatic Research
46
(
1
),
1
12
.
Raslan
Y.
&
Abdelbary
R.
2001
Economical and Environmental Aspects of Navigation Development in the Nile
. In
Sixth International Water Technology Conference, IWTC
,
Alexandria, Egypt
.
River Transport Authority, RTA
2019
Navigational Waterways in Egypt Report
.
Egypt
.
River Transport Authority, RTA
2020
Guidelines and rules for Nile river Inland navigation. Egypt
.
Saber
M. M.
2011
Improving River Transport Productivity by Improving the River Ports Performance Quality
.
PQI, AASTMT
,
Alexandria, Egypt
.
Tinggui
C.
,
Gongfa
L.
,
Jianjun
Y.
&
Honghai
L.
2016
Wireless smart sensor networks, system, trends, and the applications in engineering
.
Hindawi Publishing Corporation Journal of Sensors
1526153
,
3
.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155
.
United Nations 2018 Educational, Economic and Social Council, Progress towards the Sustainable Development Goals Report: sustainable development
.
United Nations 2019 Department of Economic and Social Affairs, World Population Prospects Report: Highlights (ST/ESA/SER.A/423)
.
Vries
K.
2017
The power of inland navigation, s.l.: Dutch Inland Navigation Information Agency (BVB)
.
Weijun
F.
,
Hongbo
L.
,
Xie
X.
&
Yongbo
J.
2011
Using More Inland Rivers in Intermodal Transport (FINAL REPORT)
.
APEC Transportation Working Group – APEC Project TPT 01/2009A
.
Willems
C.
2011
PIANC RIS Guideline, Smart Rivers Technical Report on the Implementation of RIS
.
Netherland
.
World Bank 2018 World Bank Annual Report. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Development Association (IDA). Creative Commons Attribution. Washington, United States.
World Bank 2020 Population Annual Report. International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Development Association (IDA). Supporting Countries in Unprecedented Times. Washington, United States.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).