It is proposed that a numerical environmental model cannot be justified for predictive tasks without an implicit uncertainty analysis which uses reliable and transparent methods. Various methods of uncertainty-based model calibration are reviewed and demonstrated. Monte Carlo simulation of data, Generalised Likelihood Uncertainty Estimation (GLUE), the Metropolis algorithm and a set-based approach are compared using the Streeter–Phelps model of dissolved oxygen in a stream. Using idealised data, the first three of these calibration methods are shown to converge the parameter distributions to the same end result. However, in practice, when the properties of the data and model structural errors are less well defined, GLUE and the set-based approach are proposed as more versatile for the robust estimation of parametric uncertainty. Methods of propagation of parametric uncertainty are also reviewed. Rosenblueth's two-point method, first-order variance propagation, Monte Carlo sampling and set theory are applied to the Streeter–Phelps example. The methods are then shown to be equally successful in application to the example, and their relative merits for more complex modelling problems are discussed.
Skip Nav Destination
Research Article| July 01 2002
Estimation and propagation of parametric uncertainty in environmental models
Neil McIntyre ;
Tel: +44 207 594 6019; Fax: +44 207 823 9401; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Search for other works by this author on:
Howard Wheater ;
Journal of Hydroinformatics (2002) 4 (3): 177–198.
Neil McIntyre, Howard Wheater, Matthew Lees; Estimation and propagation of parametric uncertainty in environmental models. Journal of Hydroinformatics 1 July 2002; 4 (3): 177–198. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/hydro.2002.0018
Download citation file: