ABSTRACT
The southern plain of Nepal recognized as the ‘granary of Nepal’, confronts recurrent monsoon-induced flooding, posing a substantial threat to its pivotal role as a major agricultural contributor to the national economy. As an analysis, this study employs advanced satellite imagery to delineate historical floods in nine flood-prone transboundary basins and compares the rainfall-induced model-based inundation in the West Rapti Basin (WRB) to validate the result. The extent of flooding was mapped between 2015 and 2022 using Sentinel-1 Synthetic Aperture Radar data processed on Google Earth Engine. Hydrodynamic modelling centred on the WRB, incorporated daily measured precipitation data with varying return periods over a 10 m resolution digital elevation model generated through an in situ survey. The model was calibrated for the August 2017 flood event with Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency greater than 70% and validation reasonably with satellite-derived flood maps with Cohen's Kappa value of 0.58 and an overall accuracy metric of 0.84. This synergic approach integrates climatology, remote sensing data, and hydraulics to monitor transboundary river floods in Nepal where precise hydro-meteorological data are limited, thus, offering continuous all-weather monitoring.
HIGHLIGHTS
Satellite imagery (processed on Google Earth Engine) was used to study inundation in nine flood-prone transboundary rivers of Nepal.
Hydraulic modelling in the West Rapti River (gauged basin) validates the accuracy of flood prediction tools against satellite-maps.
Climatology, remote sensing, and hydraulics-mixed multidisciplinary approach validates the application of remote sensing for flood inundation studies, especially in data-scarce regions.
INTRODUCTION
Floods, recognized as the most common and devastating natural disasters globally, inflict substantial economic, agricultural, and human losses (Cred 2018). These catastrophic events pose a significant threat to infrastructure, agriculture, and natural habitats, impacting the lives of those affected. Timely and accurate mapping of floods is thereby imperative for emergency responders and decision-makers who rely on this information to allocate resources and evacuate affected areas. In the southern Terai region and valleys of Nepal, characterized by diverse topography, floods and associated inundation are recurrent and widespread (Smith et al. 2017; Thapa et al. 2020). This region, encompassing the entire 1,700 km Nepal–India border, experiences severe flooding annually during the monsoon season. Furthermore, the construction of infrastructures such as high embankment roads (with very few cross-water drainages) and barrages (immediately downstream of transboundary) to hold the monsoon floods on the other side of the border has resulted in a backwater effect on Nepal's border causing severe inundation resulting in substantial damage to agriculture and infrastructure (Sharma et al. 2019; Gupta et al. 2021). The impact on agriculture, particularly crops such as paddy and maize, leads to massive losses in agricultural land and property (Gautam et al. 2023). In the context of Nepal, the issue of flooding is noticeable in low-relief mountains and the Mahabharat range amplifying towards Siwaliks where a severe flash flood is prominent during monsoon season. Increased river flows in the lower Siwaliks during these storms create massive flash floods in the southern plains resulting in excessive sedimentation and inundation towards transboundary regions based on observations from the past (Kafle 2020). Despite the attention given to nine key rivers in the region, flood, and associated issues persist due to insufficient evidence and challenges in management, which is a reason why flood modelling and mapping is essential for understanding and responding to these disasters (Merz et al. 2007; Mudashiru et al. 2021). This complication in gathering evidence escalates due to scarce data-measuring facilities on the southern transboundary where there is a serious concern of cross-border intervention highlighting the application of remote sensing in these regions.
Hydraulic modelling, with adequate resources and validation, has become a trending practice in flood inundation mapping and impact assessment (Aryal et al. 2020; Devkota et al. 2020; Thapa et al. 2020). However, for large rivers lacking adequate observational records, satellite-based products such as Sentinel 1 offer valuable information for delineating flood extent maps and assessing impacts (Psomiadis 2016; Sharma et al. 2019b) due to their ability to capture images through cloud cover and even at night, proving indispensable in all-weather, day-night monitoring (Maggioni & Massari 2018; Shen et al. 2019). The high spatial resolution of Sentinel 1 enables the detection of changes caused by floods, including the expansion of water bodies and the erosion of riverbanks. Beyond mapping, Sentinel 1 also monitors flood progress over time, aiding emergency responders in planning and anticipating impacts on communities and infrastructure (Manjusree et al. 2012). Hydro-meteorological characteristics, encompassing elements such as precipitation, evaporation, humidity, wind speed, and temperature, play a crucial role in flood dynamics due to their influence on the extent and severity of flood inundation (Estrany et al. 2020). Therefore, understanding and monitoring these characteristics are vital for predicting and assessing flood risks, issuing early warnings, and implementing effective mitigation measures. Traditional flood extent modelling involves numerical models based on the conservation of mass and momentum principles, which provide accurate simulations; however, significant computational resources and expertise are required to achieve relevant accuracy. The reduction in computational extensiveness commonly achieved through simplification of complex equations further adds up uncertainty in the model.
The robustness in the application of advanced machine learning (ML) models such as long-short-term-memory, multilayer perceptron-firefly algorithm, support vector machine, relevant vector machine, adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system, and extreme ML among others, has been much more pronounced for flood modelling and forecasting (Araghinejad et al. 2011; Chen et al. 2015; Atiquzzaman & Kandasamy 2016; Yaseen et al. 2017, 2019). However, the reliability of these models extensively depends upon the quantity of available training datasets, which adds to uncertainty for poorly gauged regions such as Nepal. Hence, the precision and reliability of flood models that can simulate small inflow–outflow datasets should also be assessed for accurately predicting and validating flood extents, particularly considering the observed overestimation in flooding extent using hydraulic modelling approaches (Giustarini et al. 2012). Refinements are required in hydraulic modelling approaches to ensure their applicability and accuracy across diverse transboundary river basins (Hong Quang et al. 2019). Similarly, flood dynamics vary across different transboundary river basins in the region, and adjustments are necessary for hydraulic modelling tools to capture these variations (Hostache et al. 2009). Therefore, the question of how to improve flood impact assessments on the data-scarce transboundary region for better evaluation of the vulnerable agricultural areas under various flooding scenarios, and the ways of enhancing the overall assessments and mitigation has become crucial.
To address these questions, the precise and reliable flood modelling tools infused with satellite-derived mapping products can aid in the context of transboundary river basins (Ali et al. 2021) in the southern plain of Nepal, which are facing a challenge of physical data scarcity to perform numerical modelling. For that, remote sensing technologies, including radar data, have emerged as valuable tools in flood mapping due to their ability to offer high-resolution, timely, and cost-effective data (Yan et al. 2015). Besides that, radar data, penetrating clouds, and fog have proven particularly useful in regions such as Bangladesh and Nepal, where floods coincide with the monsoon period, obstructing optical image acquisition (Borah et al. 2018; Sharma et al. 2019b). Although not needed due to available cloud-free images in our case, the uncertainties within the available synthetic aperture radar (SAR) products due to cloud noise, and scattering delays must be addressed and filtered upon assessment to eliminate ambiguous results.
This research aims to address existing gaps in flood modelling tools and enhance their accuracy for the southern plain of Nepal's transboundary river basins by focusing on improved flood mapping techniques, integrating advanced satellite technologies such as Sentinel 1, and considering the hydro-meteorological characteristics influencing flood dynamics. Furthermore, the study focuses on the West Rapti River basin, leaving room for potential variations in flood dynamics across the other eight transboundary basins. Addressing this gap involves refining and validating the hydraulic modelling tools to ensure their applicability across diverse river basins, providing a more comprehensive understanding of flood behaviour in the region. Similarly, depth quantification is attainable using hydraulic models if quality hydro-meteorological input data are available for validating the model results; however, the gap still exists for quantifying depth from remote sensing applications. Thus, a coupled approach is required to justify the application of remote sensing products for flood extent mapping in transboundary regions with serious concern of data scarcity, which has been done in this study. This study, therefore, seeks to get future contributions for quantifying depth, duration, and flood monitoring through the use of high-resolution satellite products, which will be revolutionary for effective emergency response planning.
METHODS
Study area
SN . | River name . | Lat (°N) . | Lon (°E) . | Province . | Outlet district . | Gauged/ungauged . | Originates from . | Drainage area (km2) . | District drained . | (Rural) Municipality . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Left . | Right . | ||||||||||
1 | Mahakali | 28.83 | 80.11 | Sudurpaschim | Kanchanpur | Gauged | High mountains | 15,587 (in Nepal: 5,087) | Darchula, Baitadi, Dadeldhura, Kanchanpur | Several | Several |
2 | West Rapti | 28.17 | 81.38 | Lumbini | Banke | Gauged | Middle mountains | 6,380 | Pyuthan, Rolpa, Arghakhachi, Dang, Banke | Rapti Sonari | Duduwa and Nepalgunj |
3 | Banganga | 27.47 | 82.96 | Lumbini | Kapilvastu | Ungauged | Siwaliks | 994 | Arghakanchi, Kapilvastu | Maharajgunj | Maharajgunj |
4 | Lal Bakaiya | 26.76 | 85.26 | Bagmati and Madhesh | Rautahat | Ungauged | Siwaliks | 985 | Makwanpur, Bara, Rautahat | Rajdevi and Yemunamai | Gaur, and Rajpur |
5 | Bagmati | 26.75 | 85.34 | Bagmati and Madhesh | Rautahat | Gauged | Hill | 3,231 | Kathmandu, Lalitpur, Bhaktapur, Makwanpur, Kavrepalanchowk, Sindhuli, Rautahat, Sarlahi | Balara, and Ram Nagar | Rajdevi, and Durga Bhagwati |
6 | Lakhandehi | 26.82 | 85.51 | Madhesh | Sarlahi | Ungauged | Terai | 194 | Sarlahi | Malangawa | Kaudena |
7 | Ratu | 26.63 | 85.78 | Bagmati and Madhesh | Mahottari | Ungauged | Siwaliks | 758 | Mahottari, Dhanusha | Jaleshwor | Jaleshwor |
8 | Khado | 26.46 | 86.77 | Madhesh | Saptari | Ungauged | Siwaliks | 120 | Saptari | Tilthi Koiladi | Chhinnamasta |
9 | Kamala | 26.61 | 86.15 | Bagmati, Madhesh, and Province 1 | Siraha | Ungauged | Hill | 2,074 | Sindhuli, Udayapur, Dhanusha, Siraha | Siraha, and Kalyanpur | Janaknandani, and Kamala |
SN . | River name . | Lat (°N) . | Lon (°E) . | Province . | Outlet district . | Gauged/ungauged . | Originates from . | Drainage area (km2) . | District drained . | (Rural) Municipality . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Left . | Right . | ||||||||||
1 | Mahakali | 28.83 | 80.11 | Sudurpaschim | Kanchanpur | Gauged | High mountains | 15,587 (in Nepal: 5,087) | Darchula, Baitadi, Dadeldhura, Kanchanpur | Several | Several |
2 | West Rapti | 28.17 | 81.38 | Lumbini | Banke | Gauged | Middle mountains | 6,380 | Pyuthan, Rolpa, Arghakhachi, Dang, Banke | Rapti Sonari | Duduwa and Nepalgunj |
3 | Banganga | 27.47 | 82.96 | Lumbini | Kapilvastu | Ungauged | Siwaliks | 994 | Arghakanchi, Kapilvastu | Maharajgunj | Maharajgunj |
4 | Lal Bakaiya | 26.76 | 85.26 | Bagmati and Madhesh | Rautahat | Ungauged | Siwaliks | 985 | Makwanpur, Bara, Rautahat | Rajdevi and Yemunamai | Gaur, and Rajpur |
5 | Bagmati | 26.75 | 85.34 | Bagmati and Madhesh | Rautahat | Gauged | Hill | 3,231 | Kathmandu, Lalitpur, Bhaktapur, Makwanpur, Kavrepalanchowk, Sindhuli, Rautahat, Sarlahi | Balara, and Ram Nagar | Rajdevi, and Durga Bhagwati |
6 | Lakhandehi | 26.82 | 85.51 | Madhesh | Sarlahi | Ungauged | Terai | 194 | Sarlahi | Malangawa | Kaudena |
7 | Ratu | 26.63 | 85.78 | Bagmati and Madhesh | Mahottari | Ungauged | Siwaliks | 758 | Mahottari, Dhanusha | Jaleshwor | Jaleshwor |
8 | Khado | 26.46 | 86.77 | Madhesh | Saptari | Ungauged | Siwaliks | 120 | Saptari | Tilthi Koiladi | Chhinnamasta |
9 | Kamala | 26.61 | 86.15 | Bagmati, Madhesh, and Province 1 | Siraha | Ungauged | Hill | 2,074 | Sindhuli, Udayapur, Dhanusha, Siraha | Siraha, and Kalyanpur | Janaknandani, and Kamala |
Data and sources
In this study, available hydro-meteorological data were retrieved from the Department of Hydrology and Meteorology (DHM), Nepal. For satellite-based flood mapping and studying the inundation pattern of rivers, radar images from Sentinel-1 and optical imageries from Landsat were accessed from the Google Earth Engine (GEE) platform. Similarly, for detailed hydraulic modelling of the floodplain, required data such as the digital elevation model (DEM) from AW3D30 (downloaded from the JAXA portal), land use/cover data maintained by the International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development (ICIMOD), and soil data from the soil and terrain database (SOTER) were also utilized. Table 2 shows the overall database and its potential sources.
Data . | Sources . | Resolution . | Length . | Processing Tool . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Radar image | Sentinel − 1 | 10 m | 2015–Present | GEE, python |
Optical image | Landsat 5, 7, 8 | 30 m | 1987–Present | GEE, python |
DEM | ALOS World 3D 30 m (AW3D30) | 30 m | Quantum Geographic Information System (QGIS), HEC-RAS | |
Soil | Soil and terrain database (SOTER) | 1:1,000,000 | QGIS, HEC-RAS | |
Land use/cover | ICIMOD | 30 m | 2000–2020 | QGIS, HEC-RAS |
Daily discharge, precipitation | DHM | Daily | 1980–2017 | MS-Excel, R, Climpact2 |
Data . | Sources . | Resolution . | Length . | Processing Tool . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Radar image | Sentinel − 1 | 10 m | 2015–Present | GEE, python |
Optical image | Landsat 5, 7, 8 | 30 m | 1987–Present | GEE, python |
DEM | ALOS World 3D 30 m (AW3D30) | 30 m | Quantum Geographic Information System (QGIS), HEC-RAS | |
Soil | Soil and terrain database (SOTER) | 1:1,000,000 | QGIS, HEC-RAS | |
Land use/cover | ICIMOD | 30 m | 2000–2020 | QGIS, HEC-RAS |
Daily discharge, precipitation | DHM | Daily | 1980–2017 | MS-Excel, R, Climpact2 |
To understand and characterize extreme rainfall in the basins, daily precipitation data acquired from the DHM were used after quality assessment. The screened data were then used to analyse the flood frequency and compute return periods for daily maximum rainfall. Furthermore, a climate extreme analysis was conducted to understand the trends in various extreme rainfall indices. For delineating flood extents, the Sentinel-1 data from 2015 to 2022 for each month of the monsoon season (June–September) were pre-processed and extracted using an adaptive histogram-thresholding algorithm (Prakash et al. 2022). Next, the West Rapti River was chosen as the study area for detailed hydraulic modelling due to the sufficient availability of hydro-meteorological data, and cloud-free satellite images during the flooding period. Besides that, a cross-section survey was conducted near the border region and a 10 m resolution DEM was developed from the survey points. The generated DEM was merged with AW3D 30 m resolution DEM for the whole basin and a 2-D rain-on-grid model was set up for the basin in Hydrologic Engineering Center-River Analysis System (HEC-RAS). The model was simulated and calibrated for the 2017 August flooding event and validated with the satellite-derived flood map. The validated model was then used to simulate flooding extent and hazards for various return period scenarios.
Climatic extreme analysis
Observed daily precipitation (P) data were collected from the DHM in and around the vicinity of the nine watersheds. Data quality was assessed based on the percentage of missing values and exploratory analysis plots, such as hyetographs and average annual as well as monthly values. The time series data were reviewed for discrepancies using visual plots and statistical analysis, and the stations with good-quality data were retained for further investigation after extensive exploratory analysis. Based on the quality of the data, a suitable data length was chosen for filling and subsequent analysis. Thereafter, missing precipitation values were filled using the normal ratio method (Armanuos et al. 2020).
Rainfall frequency analysis
Rainfall frequency analysis helps in understanding the frequency and magnitude of extreme rainfall events, which is crucial for the identification of the proper timing of flood extent. One of the commonly used probability distributions in rainfall frequency analysis is the Gumbel distribution. The Gumbel distribution, also known as the Type I extreme value distribution, is often applied to model the maximum or minimum values of a random variable, such as rainfall, in a given period. The Gumbel distribution is characterized by two parameters: location (μ) and scale (β). The location parameter represents the position of the distribution's mode or peak, while the scale parameter determines the spread or variability of the distribution. These parameters can be estimated using various statistical methods, such as the method of moments or maximum likelihood estimation. The Gumbel distribution was fitted for an annual time series of maximum 24-h peak rainfall for each station used in the analysis. The fitted distribution was then used to estimate the corresponding return periods for observed peak rainfall magnitude.
Characterizing climatic extremes
A total of 27 indices are considered to be core indices as per Zhang (2020). They are based on daily temperature values or daily precipitation amounts. Sixteen of them are based on temperature and 11 are based on precipitation. These indices can be calculated with the help of the Climpact2 tool. The indices based on precipitation have been listed in Table 3. Only precipitation indices are used in this study.
Indices . | Description . |
---|---|
Rx1day | Monthly maximum 1-day precipitation |
Rx5day | Monthly maximum consecutive 5-day precipitation |
R20 mm | Annual count of days when PRCP ≥ 20 mm |
CDD | Maximum length of dry spell, the maximum number of consecutive dry days with RR < 1 mm |
CWD | Maximum length of the wet spell, the maximum number of consecutive wet days with RR ≥ 1 mm |
R95pTOT | Annual total PRCP when RR > 95p |
R99pTOT | Annual total PRCP when RR > 99p |
PRCPTOT | Annual total precipitation on wet days |
Indices . | Description . |
---|---|
Rx1day | Monthly maximum 1-day precipitation |
Rx5day | Monthly maximum consecutive 5-day precipitation |
R20 mm | Annual count of days when PRCP ≥ 20 mm |
CDD | Maximum length of dry spell, the maximum number of consecutive dry days with RR < 1 mm |
CWD | Maximum length of the wet spell, the maximum number of consecutive wet days with RR ≥ 1 mm |
R95pTOT | Annual total PRCP when RR > 95p |
R99pTOT | Annual total PRCP when RR > 99p |
PRCPTOT | Annual total precipitation on wet days |
Note: PRCP, Precipitation; RR, daily precipitation; 95p = 95th percentile; 99p = 99th percentile.
Flood extent mapping based on satellite data
Radar images from the Sentinel-1 mission, available on the GEE platform, were used for mapping flood/inundation extents. GEE is a cloud-based platform for remote sensing and geospatial analysis. It is designed to allow users to access, process, and analyse large volumes of geospatial data quickly and efficiently (Pham-Duc et al. 2023; Prodromou et al. 2023). The Sentinel-1 image collection in GEE contains Level-1 ground range detected scenes that have been processed to provide backscatter coefficient values in decibels (dB). The backscatter coefficient represents the radar cross-section of the target, or how much the terrain reflects the incident microwave radiation towards or away from the SAR sensor. This value is important because it depends on the physical characteristics of the terrain, such as its geometry and electromagnetic properties. To derive the backscatter coefficient in each pixel, Earth Engine uses a series of pre-processing steps, including applying an orbit file, removing noise and invalid data, applying radiometric calibration values, and performing terrain correction.
The pre-processed images are then input to a surface water extraction algorithm. The algorithm we used is called edge-otsu. It is a histogram-based adaptive thresholding algorithm. A common approach to extracting water from Sentinel-1 imagery is thresholding with a value below which all pixels are water and all others are land (Markert et al. 2020). The threshold value is often determined using the distribution of the pixels. However, the histogram must be bimodal to adequately represent equal areas of land and water. To achieve this, the implemented algorithm first detects the water edges using a canny edge detector. The edges are then buffered equally on both sides to include equal areas of land and water ensuring bimodality in the obtained histogram. The Otsu thresholding is performed for pixels sampled from the buffered region.
The surface water extracted in this way also includes permanent water bodies, including lakes or large irrigation canals. It is crucial to classify permanent and actual flooding in the generated maps. To do so, the same methodology was applied to the dry period of the year. A median composite of the images from all the remaining months of the year was used as a reference image. The reference image underwent the same procedure of water extraction, which was classified as permanent water. Finally, a difference in surface water image and permanent water produced the final flooding map. These flood maps were then aggregated at a monthly scale so that they would span the whole basin and statistics such as area extent could be computed. The final products are monthly spatial maps and time series of flooding extent from 2015 to 2022.
Flood inundation model-based mapping
For this study, a two-dimensional rain-on-grid model was developed in the HEC-RAS, which enables the incorporation of a hydrologic model within the hydraulic modelling framework (Costabile et al. 2020). The new HEC-RAS version six features the inclusion of spatially varying precipitation using various interpolation methods. Daily precipitation data from 16 ground-based meteorological stations within and around the basin were acquired and used as meteorological input to the HEC-RAS model. For terrain, a DEM AW3D with a spatial resolution of 30 m was used in the model. However, in the study extent near the border, a detailed cross-section survey was carried out. The acquired survey points were then converted to DEM using interpolation techniques in ArcGIS software. The resulting DEM had a spatial resolution of 10 m and was merged with the 30 m AW3D DEM creating a seamless DEM for the whole study basin. Model development in HEC-RAS was initiated by setting up an external boundary condition (outflow) near the Indo-Nepal border. A precipitation inflow (at meteorological gauge locations) for the entire 2D flow area and a normal depth for the outflow boundary condition were established. Precipitation inflow was provided as per the meteorological gauge coordinates. The land use and infiltration layers were then created; these were the key calibration parameters for matching the flow characteristics. A variable Manning's ‘n’ value, percentage imperviousness, and infiltration parameters were used based on different land cover classes. An initial value of Manning's n was first adopted using the parameter range recommended by HEC-RAS software. The model was then calibrated and validated to mimic the observed discharge and rating curves at Bagasoti and Jalkundi gauging stations for the flood events of 1999, 2014, and 2017 AD. This was attained based on simulation for different land cover types through a rigorous trial-and-error method.
For the event-based simulation, we selected the floods of August 2017 since they had the largest flooding extent based on Sentinel-1 flood mapping and historical climate analysis. The HEC-RAS model was run from 1 to 30 August 2017. The mapping, hydrograph, and detailed output intervals were taken as 1 day whereas the computation interval was set as 10 min with variation as per courant condition.
There are also practices to present results in the form of scatter plots, and Taylor and Violin plots. However, they were not suitable for this study due to the binary classification (i.e., flooded and non-flooded areas) of data in our case.
RESULTS
Climatic extremes
The climatic indices for the Mahakali watershed, specifically RX1day, RX5day, R95pTOT, and R99pTOT, display an increasing trend at both stations, with station 105 showing a significant increase across all four heavy precipitation indices. Cumulative Dry Days (CDD) and Cumulative Wet Days (CWD) exhibit mixed trends at both stations, with CWD significantly increasing in station 105 and decreasing in station 214 (Figure 3). R20 mm shows a varied trend. Total annual wet day precipitation (PRCPTOT) demonstrates a significant increasing trend for station 105 and a decreasing trend for station 214.
In the WRB, heavy precipitation indices increase in stations below 1,000 m but decline at higher elevations. CDD generally increases, while CWD varies across regions. R20 mm decreases in a majority of stations, indicating fewer high precipitation days. PRCPTOT increases in stations below 1,000 m but varies at higher elevations. For the Banganga basin, climatic indices representing heavy precipitation exhibit a predominantly non-significant decreasing trend in the representative station. CDD increases, indicating more dry days, while CWD decreases, suggesting fewer wet days. R20 mm significantly decreases, indicating a decline in high precipitation over time. PRCPTOT also decreases, indicating a reduction in total annual precipitation. In the Lalbakaiya basin, extreme indices such as CDD and CWD increase, while all other extreme indices show a decreasing trend, suggesting decreasing rainfall and increasing dry days. Slightly increasing trends in consecutive wet days imply an increase in days with rainfall greater or equal to 1 mm. In the Bagmati basin, consecutive dry days decrease, but maximum one-day precipitation increases in most parts except the middle portion. Indices signifying heavy precipitation show non-significant increasing trends in stations below 150 m, while CDD increases in all stations. R20 mm decreases in most stations, indicating a reduction in high precipitation days. PRCPTOT shows mixed trends. Lakhandehi basin experiences non-significant increasing trends in heavy precipitation indices for stations below 150 m and increasing CDD in all stations. CWD exhibits mixed trends, and R20 mm decreases in most stations, signifying fewer high precipitation days. Ratu River data reveal an increasing trend in maximum 1-day and maximum consecutive 5-day rainfall, while the number of days with rainfall ≥10, 20, and 25 mm decreases. Dry days increase, and wet days decrease. Annual and seasonal rainfall decreases, except in the pre-monsoon season. The Kamala basin sees decreasing trends in extreme indices at higher elevations and an increasing trend at lower elevations. CDD increases throughout the basin, while R10, R20, and R25 mm decrease, indicating more dry days and fewer days with higher rainfall. Khado River data shows non-significant decreasing trends in heavy precipitation indices, increasing CDD, decreasing CWD, and a non-significant decrease in R20 mm and PRCPTOT, suggesting decreasing high precipitation over time.
Flood extent mapping based on satellite data
The comprehensive analysis of flood extents across multiple river basins in the southern plains of Nepal provides valuable insights into the spatio-temporal patterns and variability of flooding events. The examination of nine river systems highlights the distinct characteristics and challenges associated with each basin.
Model-based flood inundation mapping
. | Manning's n . | . | . | . | . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Landcover class . | Range . | Calibration . | Per cent impervious . | Maximum deficit (mm) . | Initial deficit (mm) . | Percolation rate (mm/h) . |
NoData | n/a | 0.001 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Grassland | 0.02–0.05 | 0.05 | 5 | 25 | 10 | 1.25 |
Water | 0.025–0.05 | 0.05 | 95 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Snow | n/a | 0.035 | 98 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Forest | 0.08–0.20 | 0.13 | 10 | 25 | 15 | 4.25 |
RiverBed | 0.07–0.15 | 0.12 | 85 | 15 | 10 | 1.2 |
Built | 0.12–0.20 | 0.12 | 85 | 10 | 5 | 0.2 |
Cropland | 0.02–0.05 | 0.05 | 5 | 15 | 8 | 0.65 |
BareRock | 0.023–0.03 | 0.03 | 60 | 10 | 5 | 0.45 |
. | Manning's n . | . | . | . | . | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Landcover class . | Range . | Calibration . | Per cent impervious . | Maximum deficit (mm) . | Initial deficit (mm) . | Percolation rate (mm/h) . |
NoData | n/a | 0.001 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Grassland | 0.02–0.05 | 0.05 | 5 | 25 | 10 | 1.25 |
Water | 0.025–0.05 | 0.05 | 95 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Snow | n/a | 0.035 | 98 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Forest | 0.08–0.20 | 0.13 | 10 | 25 | 15 | 4.25 |
RiverBed | 0.07–0.15 | 0.12 | 85 | 15 | 10 | 1.2 |
Built | 0.12–0.20 | 0.12 | 85 | 10 | 5 | 0.2 |
Cropland | 0.02–0.05 | 0.05 | 5 | 15 | 8 | 0.65 |
BareRock | 0.023–0.03 | 0.03 | 60 | 10 | 5 | 0.45 |
DISCUSSION
In the Mahakali basin, there are notable variations in observed monthly flood extents during the monsoon season, emphasizing the dynamic nature of flooding events. The peak flood extent recorded in June 2022 highlights the need for up-to-date monitoring and predictive models. The return period analysis of the 2015 June flood further emphasizes the importance of understanding historical flood events. In the context of the Banganga River basin, despite limited rainfall station coverage, substantial flooding occurs during the monsoon months. The June 2019 flood event, with its short return period, underscores the importance of considering local factors and topographical nuances in flood risk assessments. The reliance on satellite-based mapping, as demonstrated in this study, proves crucial in regions with sparse ground-level monitoring. The Lalbakaiya River basin displays unique flooding patterns due to fluctuating water levels caused by small dams, particularly pronounced due to the limited excess waterway passage across the transboundary line following the construction of embanked roads. Similar effects are observed in a major river at a transboundary location during flood events. The largest flood in July 2019, coupled with its lengthy return period, necessitates a nuanced approach to floodplain management, considering both climatic and anthropogenic factors. Similarly, in the Bagmati River basin, the observed patterns of flooding highlight the importance of detailed spatial analysis. The July 2019 flood, characterized by its extensive coverage and exceptionally long return period, emphasizes the need for enhanced floodplain modelling and preparedness measures. The Lakhandehi River basin, in the July 2019 flood event, with its substantial return period, underscores the complexity of flood dynamics in this region. The Ratu Watershed, characterized as a rainfed seasonal river, presents unique challenges in flood prediction and management. The observed decrease in rainfall events with higher return periods implies a shifting precipitation pattern, influencing flood dynamics. Spatial maps depicting monthly and yearly flooding extents provide a comprehensive view of flood events, aiding in the identification of vulnerable areas. In the Kamala River basin, the detailed analysis of flood extents and return periods underscores the importance of considering both temporal and spatial dimensions in flood risk assessments. The July 2020 flood, with its substantial return period, indicates the need for adaptive strategies. Finally, the Khado River basin, characterized by its non-perennial nature, exhibits varying flood extents during the monsoon season. The observed flooding events in July 2020, July 2019, and August 2017, each with distinct return periods, highlight the need for basin-specific flood management strategies.
Uncertainties in climate extremes and flood inundation mapping
The rainfall extreme analysis in nine watersheds across Nepal reveals varying trends and patterns. While some regions experienced increased rainfall intensity and frequency, others witnessed decreases. These shifts may have significant implications for water resources management, flood risk assessment, and agricultural practices in these areas. The majority of basins (except Mahakali) showed an increase in CDD, which validates our findings from Subba et al. (2019). On the contrary, there was an asynchronous variation in CWD across studied regions, limiting our ability to recommend effective mitigation strategies. Specifically, the WRB experiences an increase in heavy precipitation indices at stations below 1,000 m but a decline at higher elevations. R20 mm decreases in a majority of stations, indicating fewer high precipitation days. PRCPTOT increases in stations below 1,000 m but varies at higher elevations. Thus, the climate extreme analysis in WRB, characterized by its diverse topography, presents unique challenges in flood management. However, the limited number of meteorologic ground stations available in some of the study basins limits the overall understanding of climatic extremes from this study. Furthermore, the uncertainties add up from neglecting the shift of the East Asia Summer/Winter Monsoon cycle to minimize research complexity. These are complicated yet indispensable for the analysis of climate extremes.
The inundation study across nine river basins in Nepal's southern plains revealed distinct flood patterns where flooding typically peaked during monsoon season, the majority in the month of July with some exceptions. The largest recorded flood extent varied considerably, ranging from 12.5 km2 in the Khando basin to 260 km2 in the Bagmati basin. Return periods, indicating flood severity, also differed significantly across basins as per flood events. The highest flood extent observed in WRB on August 2017, with a considerable return period, emphasizes the severity of extreme flooding events. While we show that the flood extent map derived from radar shows high accuracy as compared to HEC-RAS hydraulic modelling, both of these approaches come with their own limitations and uncertainties. Employing the radar-based flood mapping algorithm in densely forested areas might give erroneous results as the C-band cannot penetrate the canopy structure (Chapman et al. 2015). There are also uncertainties pertaining to the subsequent processes of radar-based flood mapping like in choice of filtering methods and initial threshold determination. Similarly, flood inundation mapping using hydraulic models also possesses uncertainty at various stages, including uncertainty in forcing, model structure, and calibration approaches. The poor gauging facilities near transboundary regions, have added uncertainty in validating the results. The DEM used in this study was interpolated using point-based measurement, which could also affect the modelling results. So future research endeavours should prioritize the enhancement of DEMs, possibly through higher-resolution surveys, to improve the accuracy of hydraulic models. Flooding in Rapti Barrage, India, located immediately downstream of the study boundary can be referred to from the social media video, extracted from YouTube (Bazar 2017), which shows huge flooding in August 2017. However, estimation and validation of flood depth from this particular media source still remains a challenge from both modelling and the satellite-based product's perspective and is considered a limitation of this study.
Creating synergies in under-observed regions
The integration of advanced satellite technologies, such as Sentinel-1, coupled with detailed hydro-meteorological data-driven models, provides a holistic understanding of flood dynamics in transboundary river basins. However, addressing the challenges related to DEM resolution and satellite data interpolation is crucial for minimizing inaccuracies, particularly in upstream areas. Thus, recognizing the limitations and uncertainties in both hydraulic models and satellite-based products, the findings from this study suggest the application of satellite products in cases of fast response during the flooding period especially for ungauged transboundary river systems. The study provides a foundation for broader implications across transboundary river basins, aiding policymakers and emergency responders in developing robust flood risk management strategies.
In regions characterized by data scarcity and with challenges in capturing real-time hydro-meteorological as well as physical terrain data across transboundary areas, the satellite-generated real-time flood map offers more accurate information on river floodplains. Besides that, the computational intricacy of a data-driven model seems to be a reason why researchers are more inclined towards remote sensing products (Ali et al. 2021; Lamada et al. 2023; Shilengwe et al. 2023). For under-observed regions, transferring the hydrological parameters from nearby gauged regions based on the catchment's hydrologic similarity index might help estimate the flood extent to compare satellite-derived flood extent (Burn & Boorman 1993; Oudin et al. 2008; Narbondo et al. 2020; Karki et al. 2023). Also, integrating ML algorithms for precise flood extent predictions, particularly in challenging terrains, holds promise. In conclusion, this research significantly advances our understanding of flood dynamics in the southern plain of Nepal, with an emphasis on the West Rapti River basin. The integration of satellite technologies, hydro-meteorological data, and hydraulic modelling has laid a foundation for improved flood risk management, providing valuable insights on the use of satellite-based products for future studies and interventions, particularly in poorly gauged regions.
CONCLUSIONS
The southern plain of Nepal is affected by widespread flooding during the monsoon season of each year. Regarded as the ‘granary of Nepal’, this region, however, is a very important part of the country with substantial contribution to the nation's economy through large agricultural production. It is thus important to study the flooding behaviour and assess its impacts in these regions. This study therefore leverages high-resolution and open-source satellite imagery to delineate past floods in nine flood-prone transboundary basins: Mahakali, West Rapti, Banganga, Lal Bakaiya, Bagmati, Lakhandehi, Ratu, Kamala, and Khando. The study involves assessing rainfall characteristics, creating real-time flood inundation maps from satellite data, performing intricate hydraulic modelling in one of the nine basins using cross-sectional survey data and scrutinizing and validating the model and satellite-based outputs at a transboundary location.
The rainfall frequency analysis identified two major flooding events in most of the basins: during August 2017 and July 2019. The extreme analysis also showed increasing trends of rainfall extremes in most of the basins. The Sentinel-1-derived flood mapping was consistent with the rainfall frequency analysis and showed large flood extents during the two widespread events. Two key outputs of the satellite flood mapping were the spatio-temporal flood inundation map for each month of monsoon season from 2015 to 2022 as well as the monthly time series of the inundation area. Among the analysed nine transboundary basins, the WRB was selected due to clear image availability, larger cross sections of the channel (easily captured through remote sensing products), available input data for hydraulic modelling (rainfall, discharge), and relevant works of literature for justification of the provided inputs. The event-based flood modelling in the WRB using HEC-RAS 2D could identify the flooding in the downstream zone near the transboundary. The extent of monthly maximum flood inundation resulted in an overall accuracy of 84.3% and a Kappa metric of 0.58. While the hydraulic model seemed to accurately pinpoint downstream flooding, it tended to slightly overestimate the overall extent compared to SAR-derived flood maps. This shows the limitation of remote sensing products in capturing peak flood events (maximum inundation duration and extent), and other associated characteristics such as flood depth.
The use of SAR products in transboundary flood studies has proven helpful, but only after a thorough assessment of errors and noise to minimize the uncertainty, where the data constraints still prevail. So, this study brings a multidisciplinary approach to monitoring flooding in the transboundary rivers of Nepal by combining multiple facets from climatology and hydraulics to river morphology. The derived flood inundation maps can be used to prioritize highly affected and frequent flooding zones. These maps can also help in identifying proper sites for river training as well as flood protection measures. In the absence of accurate and reliable data on hydro-meteorological variables, satellite remote sensing-based products, especially SAR contain all-time all-weather data, which is highly useful for monitoring flooding. Notwithstanding, the quantification of depth and duration of the flooding is still a limitation of this study and is earmarked for future research. Let us hope for the satellite products to evolve towards the quantification of these primary and intricate challenges in the near future.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Data cannot be made publicly available; readers should contact the corresponding author for details.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.