Abstract
Drought is a major problem in Ethiopia and particularly affects the agricultural and water sectors. This paper aims to assess the spatial and temporal drought variability of central Ethiopia. For this purpose, archival rainfall data recorded from 1989 to 2017 and the Gurage zone topographic maps were used. The five stations’ Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) were combined with the geographical information system (GIS) to analyze the spatial distribution of drought events. The results show that a total number of 41 drought events were recorded in the region. The number of drought events reaches its maximum value in the year 1992, whereas Bui and Koshe contain the most frequent drought events. The spatial analysis of droughts verifies that most of the frequent and extreme events are recorded in the eastern part of the region. The lowland part of Gurage zone is very prone to drought. The grounded spatio-temporal drought risk events analysis has shown a possible threat to the water and rain-fed farming that has a cascading effect on the livelihoods of farmers. Moreover, the drought condition of the region is unpredictable and recurrent. This study recommends further study containing remaining statistical drought indices such as reconnaissance drought and streamflow drought index.
HIGHLIGHTS
Some parts of the zone were found to be very sensitive and vulnerable to drought events.
Drought conditions in the area were found to be unpredictable and recurrent.
Areas vulnerable to drought were identified, which helps to point out adaptation options and spot early warning signs, establishing a climate research center and refugee camp.
The level of drought risk in the area was identified against the global risk measurement scale.
INTRODUCTION
A natural hazard is a natural occurrence that might have a negative effect on living organisms and the environment. Natural hazard events can be classified into two broad categories: geophysical and biological (Burton et al. 1993). Internal or external processes such as active diastrophism and climate changes are capable of changing landforms and activating natural hazards, which in some cases control human activities (Bathrellos et al. 2014). Among meteorological or climate hazards, drought and flood are common hazards for our ecosystem. Literally, drought is a period of below-average precipitation in a given region, resulting in lengthy shortages in the water supply, whether atmospheric, surface water, or groundwater. Scientists warn that global warming and climate change may result in more extensive droughts in the near future (Nagarajan 2010). These extensive droughts are likely to occur within the African continent due to its very low precipitation levels and high temperatures/pressure (Calow et al. 2010).
Droughts occur frequently in some parts of the world (Mishra & Singh 2011). A drought can last for years, or may be declared as drought after as few as 15 days, and if lasting for less than 15 days is declared a dry spell (Sivakumar 1992). Recurrent drought has a substantial impact on the ecosystem, agriculture and water sector of the affected region and harms the social, cultural, and economic life of the locality (Amsalu & Adem 2009). Extreme heat can significantly worsen drought conditions by hastening evaporation of soil and surface water and transpiration of plant leaf (Dai et al. 2018). Frequent drought is common in the tropics and significantly increases the chances of a famine, poverty, fragile ecosystem, and subsequent natural fires (Brando et al. 2019). Drought is one of the most devastating natural hazards, and has exerted negative impacts on industrial production, labor efficiency, agricultural production, electricity production, and groundwater potential (Omer 2008). In Ethiopia, recurrent drought has been observed in different time periods with diverse magnitude and dimensions since 1957 (Table 1).
Chronological story of drought in Ethiopia from 1957 to 2017 (source: Menkir 2018; Mekonen et al. 2020)
Year . | Region affected . | Effect and damage . |
---|---|---|
1957/58 | Tigray and Wollo | Rain failure in 1957 and about 100,000 people died |
1962/63 | Western Ethiopia | Extreme drought |
1964–66 | Tigray and Wollo | About 1.5 million people affected |
1971–75 | Ethiopia | Rain failures; estimated about 250,000 dead; 50% of livestock lost in Tigray and Wollo |
1978/79 | Southern Ethiopia | Failure in Belg rain and 1.4 million people affected |
1982 | Northern Ethiopia | Late Meher rains and 2 million people affected |
1984/85 | Ethiopia | Rain failure; 8 million people affected |
1987/88 | Ethiopia | 7 million people affected |
1990–92 | Northern, Eastern, and SW Ethiopia | Rain failure, about 4 million people suffering food shortage |
1993/94 | Tigray and Wollo | Widespread food insecurity (7.6 million people were affected), but few deaths or cases of displacement were reported |
1997 | Borena, Bale, Omo, Somali | Almost 986,000 people affected |
1999 | N. and S. Wollo, Wag, Himra; Tigray; B. Gumu, Gambela, Oromia, SNNPR, Somali | Almost 5 million people affected |
2003/4 | All regions | Over 13 million people affected, but the response mitigated the worst potential outcomes |
2005 | Somali, Oromia | Almost 2.6 million drought disaster affected people |
2008/9 | All regions | Almost 12.6 million people affected |
2011 | S and E. Oromia, Somali | Severe food insecurity and 4 million people affected |
2015/16 | N, E, and SW Ethiopia | About 10.2 million people affected |
2017/2018 | Southeastern Ethiopia | Estimated a total of 7.88 million people affected |
Year . | Region affected . | Effect and damage . |
---|---|---|
1957/58 | Tigray and Wollo | Rain failure in 1957 and about 100,000 people died |
1962/63 | Western Ethiopia | Extreme drought |
1964–66 | Tigray and Wollo | About 1.5 million people affected |
1971–75 | Ethiopia | Rain failures; estimated about 250,000 dead; 50% of livestock lost in Tigray and Wollo |
1978/79 | Southern Ethiopia | Failure in Belg rain and 1.4 million people affected |
1982 | Northern Ethiopia | Late Meher rains and 2 million people affected |
1984/85 | Ethiopia | Rain failure; 8 million people affected |
1987/88 | Ethiopia | 7 million people affected |
1990–92 | Northern, Eastern, and SW Ethiopia | Rain failure, about 4 million people suffering food shortage |
1993/94 | Tigray and Wollo | Widespread food insecurity (7.6 million people were affected), but few deaths or cases of displacement were reported |
1997 | Borena, Bale, Omo, Somali | Almost 986,000 people affected |
1999 | N. and S. Wollo, Wag, Himra; Tigray; B. Gumu, Gambela, Oromia, SNNPR, Somali | Almost 5 million people affected |
2003/4 | All regions | Over 13 million people affected, but the response mitigated the worst potential outcomes |
2005 | Somali, Oromia | Almost 2.6 million drought disaster affected people |
2008/9 | All regions | Almost 12.6 million people affected |
2011 | S and E. Oromia, Somali | Severe food insecurity and 4 million people affected |
2015/16 | N, E, and SW Ethiopia | About 10.2 million people affected |
2017/2018 | Southeastern Ethiopia | Estimated a total of 7.88 million people affected |
Drought occurrence can be assessed in space and time through a sound basis of scientific use of historical data (Tsakiris et al. 2007). Currently, there are many statistical-based drought indices, for example, the Reconnaissance Drought Index (RDI) and the Streamflow Drought Index (SDI). Also, the widely used Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) and rainfall deciles can be used (Tigkas et al. 2015). The common characteristics of the SPI and rainfall deciles are that they require a relatively small amount of data for their analysis and the results can be easily interpreted and used in strategic planning and operational applications. Principally, SPI is usually used as a meteorological drought indicator but based on rainfall information alone, which is significantly both a strength and shortcoming (Temam et al. 2019). A study conducted by Shamshirband et al. (2020) verified that SPI is the drought index that delivers higher accuracy than other indices. Ali Ghorbani et al. (2018) stated that the possibility to estimate drought through evaporation rates using novel learning algorithms remains a vital task for agriculture and water resources management.
Drought is one of the most common climatic or meteorological hazards, and has significant impacts on the livelihoods and economy of Gurage zone. The use of long-term climate data can be employed to analyze the spatial and temporal drought characteristics, and the outcomes of such study would be helpful for better understanding drought behavior and for adaptation options. To fill the gap, SPI-12 and a topographic map were used to assess drought in Gurage zone, and the objective of this study is to assess spatio-temporal analysis of drought variability in central Ethiopia. This work will fill the gap in planning of water resource use, mitigation, and drought disaster prevention in the region.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Description of the study site
This study was conducted in Gurage zone, one of the administrative zones of Southern Nations, Nationalities, and People Region, central Ethiopia. It is about 155 km southwest of Addis Ababa, bordering the Awash River in the north, the Gibe River (a tributary of Omo River) to the southwest and Lake Ziway in the east. The total area of the zone is about 5,893.4 km2 and is geographically located between 7° 40′ 0″–8° 20′ 0″ and 38° 0′ 0″–39° 0′ 01″ (Figure 1). The zone is characterized by a bi-modal rainfall regime, locally known as Kiremt (main rainy season) and Belg (small rainy season) seasons. Based on the 2007 Census conducted by the Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia (CSA), this zone has a total population of 1,279,646, of whom 622,078 are men and 657,568 women, and are frequently affected by drought.
Data sources and analysis techniques
Drought studies have received a great deal of attention from researchers worldwide. In the present study, historical rainfall data of Gurage zone stations were used. Daily archival rainfall data series recorded for 29 years (1989–2017) from five stations were collected from the Ethiopia National Meteorology Agency (NMA) (Table 2). Ethiopia Mapping Agency (EMA) shape file database and SPI-12 output data were used as input for geostatistical analysis (Empirical Bayesian kriging). Empirical Bayesian kriging is a geostatistical interpolation method that automates the most difficult aspects of building a valid kriging model. The primary benefits of the Empirical Bayesian kriging method are that standard errors of prediction are more accurate than other kriging methods, it requires minimal interactive modeling, allows accurate predictions of nonstationary data, and is more accurate than other kriging methods for small datasets. Moreover, other kriging methods require manual adjustment of some parameters to achieve accurate results, but Empirical Bayesian kriging automatically calculates these parameters through a process of sub-setting and simulations.
Average annual rainfall and standard deviation (SD) in the study area
No. . | Station . | Years . | Mean rainfall (mm) . | SD (mm) . | Elev. (m) . | Long. (E) . | Lat. (N) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Imdibir | 29 | 1,174.11 | 290.81 | 2,076 | 8.13 | 37.93 |
2 | Wolkite | 29 | 1,191.89 | 389.36 | 2,000 | 8.29 | 37.78 |
3 | Butajira | 29 | 984.04 | 402.45 | 2,000 | 8.12 | 38.37 |
4 | Bui | 29 | 1,063.12 | 206.62 | 2,020 | 8.32 | 38.55 |
5 | Koshe | 29 | 801.86 | 187.27 | 1,878 | 8.01 | 38.53 |
No. . | Station . | Years . | Mean rainfall (mm) . | SD (mm) . | Elev. (m) . | Long. (E) . | Lat. (N) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Imdibir | 29 | 1,174.11 | 290.81 | 2,076 | 8.13 | 37.93 |
2 | Wolkite | 29 | 1,191.89 | 389.36 | 2,000 | 8.29 | 37.78 |
3 | Butajira | 29 | 984.04 | 402.45 | 2,000 | 8.12 | 38.37 |
4 | Bui | 29 | 1,063.12 | 206.62 | 2,020 | 8.32 | 38.55 |
5 | Koshe | 29 | 801.86 | 187.27 | 1,878 | 8.01 | 38.53 |
The daily rainfall database contains information such as the location of stations (elevation, xy coordinate, city, village, and special reference point) and daily rainfall records. The EMA database contains area boundaries, districts, village, and other details.
Instat + v3.37, DrinC and XLSTAT 2019 software were used to analyze temporal drought events, whereas the spatial event was interpolated using ArcGis 10.5.1. The primary benefits of DrinC are that it's a user-friendly tool, operates with small units of data and is suitable for meteorological, hydrological, and agricultural drought analysis.
Missing data and consistency check
Missing data may be due to the absence of an observer, short disturbances in observations due to breakage, malfunction, and calibration problem of instruments during a certain time period. Therefore, this needs to be solved before undertaking further analyses. The missing values were patched using a first-order Markov chain model of Instat version 3.37 software. The benefits of the first-order Markov chain model are simplicity and out of sample forecasting accuracy and simulation. Simple models, such as those used for first-order Markov chain model, are often better at making predictions than more complicated models. The consistency of the rainfall data set was checked by the double-mass curve method and a plot of average cumulative annual rainfall data (as ordinate) against the abscissa. The double-mass curve is used to check the consistency of many kinds of hydrologic data by comparing data for a single station with that of a pattern composed of the data from several other stations in the area. The double-mass curve can be used to adjust inconsistent precipitation data of more than two stations.
Trend analysis and model specification
The test statistic Zs is used as a measure of the significance of the trend. In fact, this test statistic is used to test the null hypothesis, Ho. If |Zs| is greater than Zα/2, where α represents the chosen significance level, then the null hypothesis is rejected, implying that the trend is significant.
Another statistic obtained on running the Mann–Kendall test is Kendall's tau, which is a measure of correlation and therefore measures the strength of the relationship between the two variables. In common with other extreme correlations, Kendall's tau will take values between ±1 and +1, with a positive correlation indicating that the ranks of both variables increase together while a negative correlation indicates that as the rank of one variable increases, the other decreases.

Nowadays, there are many drought indices used to analyze drought such as the RDI, SDI, SPI, and the rainfall deciles. For this study, the SPI drought index was used due to its advantages. The advantages of this index are that it requires a relatively small number of data for its analysis and the results can be easily interpreted and used in strategic planning and operational applications. SPI is usually used as a meteorological drought indicator, but based on rainfall information alone, which significantly shows both a strength and a shortcoming.
According to the classification scale for SPI values, a positive value of the SPI denotes that rainfall at the study area is higher than average whereas a negative value of the SPI indicates that rainfall in the area is lower than normal (Du et al. 2013; Pei et al. 2013). A region will be considered as ‘extreme wet’ if the SPI value of the area is greater than or equal to +2.00 and, oppositely, the region is considered as suffering drought if the SPI value of the area is less than −2.00 (Table 3).
Classification of SPI values
SPI . | Classification . |
---|---|
≥2.00 | Extreme wet |
1.50 to 1.99 | Severe wet |
1.00 to 1.49 | Moderate wet |
0.50 to 0.99 | Mild wet |
−0.49 to 0.49 | Near normal |
−0.99 to −0.50 | Mild drought |
−1.49 to −1.00 | Moderate drought |
−1.99 to −1.50 | Severe drought |
<− 2.00 | Extreme drought |
SPI . | Classification . |
---|---|
≥2.00 | Extreme wet |
1.50 to 1.99 | Severe wet |
1.00 to 1.49 | Moderate wet |
0.50 to 0.99 | Mild wet |
−0.49 to 0.49 | Near normal |
−0.99 to −0.50 | Mild drought |
−1.49 to −1.00 | Moderate drought |
−1.99 to −1.50 | Severe drought |
<− 2.00 | Extreme drought |
Source:Du et al. 2013; Pei et al. 2013.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Missing data and consistency check
The consistency of the rainfall data set was checked by the double-mass curve method and a plot of average cumulative annual rainfall data (as ordinate) against the abscissa. As shown in Figure 2, the double-mass curve ensured that all stations’ data were consistent due to the fact that missed and outlier data were filled correctly.
Rainfall trend analysis
The annual rainfall in the four stations showed a decreasing trend by a factor of −0.2, −2.02, −8.8, and −3.21 mm per year at Bui, Butajira, Koshe, and Wolkite stations, respectively, but had an increasing trend at Imdibir station (Table 4). The result of the annual rainfall probability values showed a significant trend at Koshe and Wolkite but a non-significant trend was observed at the remaining stations, which might be associated with large inter-annual fluctuation. According to Hulme et al. (2001) and the IPCC (2001), East Africa rainfall shows an increasing trend. Negash & Eshetu (2016) reported a decreasing trend at Chida station (16.08 mm/year) and Butajira station (6.26 mm/year).
Mann–Kendall trend statistics of annual rainfall of the region
Station . | Years . | Sen's slope . | Z value . | Mk statistic (S) . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Imdibir | 29 | 4.23 | 0.138 | 56 | 0.302 |
Bui | 29 | − 0.2 | − 0.02 | − 6 | 0.922 |
Butajira | 29 | − 2.02 | − 0.24 | − 97 | 0.072 |
Koshe | 29 | − 8.8 | − 0.3 | − 112 | 0.04 |
Wolkite | 29 | − 3.21 | − 0.66 | − 249 | 0.0001 |
Station . | Years . | Sen's slope . | Z value . | Mk statistic (S) . | P-value . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Imdibir | 29 | 4.23 | 0.138 | 56 | 0.302 |
Bui | 29 | − 0.2 | − 0.02 | − 6 | 0.922 |
Butajira | 29 | − 2.02 | − 0.24 | − 97 | 0.072 |
Koshe | 29 | − 8.8 | − 0.3 | − 112 | 0.04 |
Wolkite | 29 | − 3.21 | − 0.66 | − 249 | 0.0001 |
Temporal trends of drought events
The year-to-year variation of drought in terms of normalized anomaly index (SPI-12) covering the period of 1989–2017 was examined. The study region had both wet and dry years over the study period. A mixture of dry and wet years have been observed. Of the observed period, 48.9% of rainfall was recorded above the normal average, however, below normal condition was recorded by 51.1%. Moreover, the largest negative deviation occurred in the years 1992, 2012, 2016, and 2017, while the highest positive anomalies occurred in the years 1993, 2005, and 2010 in the region (Figure 3). These findings conformed to the study by Kidane et al. (2010) on years of drought and floods in Ethiopia.
Spatial patterns of drought incidence
The general agriculture of the area predominantly depends on bimodal rainfall, Kiremt (main rainy season) and Belg (small rainy season), i.e., agricultural productivity heavily depends on rainfall characteristics such as onset and cessation of rainfall and length of growing period. Kiremt is the main rainy season in which about 85–95% of the agricultural crops of the region are cultivated. Kiremt, the period from June to September following the Belg rains, is associated with frequent rains and homogeneous temperatures, mainly in July and August. Due to their absolute dependency, a minor disturbance in Kiremt rainfall has a huge effect on the livelihood and economy of smallholder farmers of the region. The spatial analysis of droughts verifies that most of the frequent and extreme events are recorded in the eastern part of the region (Figure 4). The lowland part of Gurage zone is very prone to drought. The majority of the region has experienced severe and extreme (SPI ≤ −1.50) drought events. Specifically, Imdibir, Butajira, and Koshe experienced extreme drought with risk peak value of SPI ≤− 2) while Wolkite and Bui were affected by severe drought with risk peak value −1.8 to −1.63. The study indicated that the region is suspected of/experienced unpredictable drought events with different time scales. The observed spatio-temporal drought risk events indicate a potential hazard to the rain-oriented agriculture, hence steadily affecting the regular farming system, and water and food security.
CONCLUSIONS
This study presented space and time drought risk events through a sound basis of the scientific use of historical data in central Ethiopia using SPI-12. The results of the study prove that complex and localized spatio-temporal patterns of drought risk events were identified. This could help to recognize and characterize local-based drought conditions. The annual rainfall in four stations showed a decreasing trend whereas an increasing trend was observed at Imdibir station. There was a non-significant trend at Imdibir, Bui, and Butajira stations, but a significant trend was observed at Koshe and Wolkite stations.
During the period of study, the temporal analysis showed that there were times when the entire region experienced drought, and the largest negative deviation occurred in the years 1992, 2012, 2016, and 2017, while the highest positive anomalies occurred in the years 1993, 2005, and 2010. The number of drought events reached its maximum value in the year 1992.
The spatial analysis of droughts verifies that most of the frequent and extreme events are recorded in the eastern part of the region. The lowland part of Gurage zone is very prone to drought, and the area needs drought hazard assessment mapping. The majority of the region experienced severe and extreme (SPI ≤ −1.50) drought events. Specifically, Imdibir, Butajira, and Koshe experienced extreme drought with risk peak value of SPI ≤− 2) while Wolkite and Bui were affected by severe drought with risk peak value −1.8 to −1.63.
The study indicated that the region experienced unpredictable drought events at different time scales. The observed spatio-temporal drought risk events indicate a potential hazard to the rain-oriented agriculture, hence steadily affecting the regular farming system, and water and food security. The findings of this research could be important in strategic planning and operational applications like drought monitoring, platforms for early warning and preparedness, local-scale adaptation planning, and food security strategies and policy direction. The limitation of the study remains the lack of consistent, reliable, and recent years’ data for the case due to malfunctioning and relocation of some stations in the region. This study recommends further research on remaining statistical drought indices such as RDI and SDI. Supplementary irrigation is recommended as the best adaptation option throughout the drought period.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The author is very grateful to Wolkite University (WKU). I also express my sincere thanks to the Ethiopian National Meteorological Agency (NMA) and Mapping Agency (EMA) for readily providing me with the daily rainfall and shapefile data. The author declares no conflict of interests. The data will be provided on request to the journal.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.