Abstract
The presence of salt water from the Tagus Estuary has been identified in the influent at Barreiro/Moita Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), Portugal. The intrusion occurs throughout damaged sections and direct vectors in the wastewater collection system, during high tide levels, changing the wastewater characteristics and impacting the WWTP process. This study designed models to quantify this problem, enabling more effective countermeasures within the right timing. The proposed models estimate the average volume of salt water and sulfate () load for each high tide period. The laboratory results show strong correlations between the influent electrical conductivity (EC) and percentage of salt water in WWTP inflow (0.9909), and between EC and
concentration in WWTP influent (0.9797). The forecast models also show good correlation between the high tide levels with volume of salt water (0.9145) and
load (0.9162) entering the system. Considering the total monthly inflow, the highest percentage of salt water registered in WWTP inflow was 3.6%. During high tide periods, critical situations have been assessed with up to 53.9% of salt water in the WWTP inflow, increasing energy consumption and costs in pumping stations.
HIGHLIGHTS
Assessment methodology to quantify saltwater volume and sulfate load from saltwater intrusion in wastewater collection systems.
Saltwater intrusion impacts on WWTP process.
Forecast tools for WWTP management teams.
INTRODUCTION
Around the globe most communities are located in coastal areas making their main wastewater treatment collection systems and treatment plants to preferably be located at the lowest areas, taking advantage of the gravity flow. At the Barreiro/Moita Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP), located in Portugal, the presence of salt water from the nearby Tagus Estuary has been identified in the wastewater inflow. The saltwater intrusion effects are clearly detected during periods of high tides in the estuary. Similar issues have been identified in other wastewater collection systems and WWTPs (Serrano 2014; Phillips et al. 2015). This problem may occur throughout old and/or damaged sections, joints, manholes, emergency overflow weirs' discharge sites from separated and/or combined wastewater and stormwater collection systems, and also, pumping stations' emergency overflow weirs. Some of the emergency overflow weirs' discharge channels are equipped with retention valves that might not always work properly, and, in other cases, they are not installed, making these sites direct vectors for salt water entering into the collection systems. Due to the unexpected and unwanted presence in the wastewater flow of saltwater volume, the saltwater intrusion in these wastewater collection systems is considered an undue inflow.
Saltwater intrusion into wastewater collection systems causes extensive structural damage, increasing maintenance costs (Phillips et al. 2015). One of the main causes of structural damage to steel and concrete structures in these systems is sulfuric acid (H2SO4), which is generated by the oxidation of hydrogen sulfide (H2S). The H2S arises from sulfate () reduction by sulfate-reducing bacteria (Zhang et al. 2008) present in these systems. The increase in
load in the wastewater, due to saltwater intrusion, intensifies the problem and its consequences.
Widely recognized and recommended is the need to prevent and assess saltwater intrusion impacts upstream along the wastewater collection system rather than downstream within WWTP processes (Firer et al. 2008; Zhang et al. 2008; Talaiekhozani et al. 2016). To help this assessment it is considered good practice to develop accurate mapping of the collection system network and pumping stations, and locate the most critical saltwater intrusion sites (Phillips et al. 2015; Talaiekhozani et al. 2016).
Saltwater intrusion affects WWTP processes by changing the wastewater characteristics (Metcalf & Eddy 2014). The wide variety of high tide levels during tide cycles in the estuary and the degree of saltwater intrusion severity make it difficult to apply successful countermeasures. The process and corrective actions can be improved by using forecasting models that enable quantification of the extra volume and loading components. With a viable forecasting model methodology, it is possible to time countermeasures properly, anticipating and attenuating impacts downstream at the WWTP. Once established and consolidated, such models will enable quantification of this undue inflow and assess the economic damage caused by increased energy consumption in pumping stations from both systems, wastewater collection systems and WWTPs.
Analysis of the tide level time series from the Cascais mareograph near the Tagus Estuary demonstrates a mean sea level rise of 2.20 mm.year–1 between 1999 and 2004, and 4.10 mm.year–1 between 2005 and 2016 (Antunes 2016). It is expected that, with the mean sea level rise caused by climate change, it will increase tide levels in the estuary, intensifying the saltwater volume entering into the wastewater collection system and, therefore, into the WWTP, increasing negative impacts of this undue inflow in processes.
The aim of this study is to develop a forecasting model based on high tide values, to provide measurable quantification of saltwater intrusion's volume and load, to help WWTP management teams to apply better countermeasures within the right timing. It will also enable the understanding and assessment of the extent of economic impacts on the water utility caused by this undue inflow.
Wastewater collection system and WWTP process characterization
The study was carried out in Barreiro/Moita WWTP combined wastewater and stormwater collection systems, which receive urban and industrial wastewater, and stormwater. The main network interceptor sections are located along Barreiro and Moita municipalities' coast line with the Tagus Estuary. Some sections are old and mainly placed below mean Tagus Estuary water level, facilitating saltwater intrusion into the collection system's underground network. The main collection system interceptors collect wastewater from smaller nearby collection system networks managed by inherent municipalities and industrial zones. The wastewater collection system, including its pumping stations and the WWTP, is managed by the local water utility, SIMARSUL (Saneamento da Península de Setúbal, S.A.) (Figure 1).
Main interceptors and pumping stations in Barreiro/Moita's WWTP wastewater collection system.
Main interceptors and pumping stations in Barreiro/Moita's WWTP wastewater collection system.
The Barreiro/Moita WWTP has a maximum treatment capacity of up to 300,000 p.e. (population equivalent) and comprises the following treatment processes: initial pumping station, pre-treatment, primary treatment with lamella plate settlers, followed by conventional aeration, ending with ultra-violet (UV) radiation disinfection prior to treated water final discharge. Primary sludge is gravity-thickened, and waste biological sludge is thickened by mechanical rotary drums. The thickened sludges are mixed and stabilized by anaerobic digestion, before dewatering by centrifuge, being later valued properly as biosolids. Also, there is an extra stormwater chemically advanced primary treatment parallel line.
Saltwater impacts and countermeasures
The presence of salt water in the wastewater increases the content leading to generation of odor in the wastewater collection system. These odors are attributed to the presence of H2S formed by the action of anaerobic bacteria in the system wall's biofilm. These anaerobic sulfate-reducing bacteria (e.g., Desulfovibrio) reduce
present in wastewater to H2S (McGhee 1991). The increase in H2S concentration in a system infrastructure's atmosphere is responsible for corrosion, and potentiates harm to operation and maintenance workers' health (Firer et al. 2008). Corrosion is caused by acidification due to the oxidation of H2S to form H2SO4, typically by the action of Thiobacillus present in the biofilm fixed on the pipe section's top walls (McGhee 1991), or through side reactions with water (H2O) condensation. For this oxidation process to occur low oxygen concentration in the system's atmosphere is required. The corrosion caused by H2SO4 can reduce the thickness of concrete pipe sections' top wall by 1 to 10 mm.year−1, generating additional costs for water utilities (Zhang et al. 2008) for maintenance and rehabilitation needs.
The main changes in wastewater influent characteristics are in its density, temperature, constituent loadings (e.g., chlorides () and (
) and volume, all of which affect different WWTP processes with the possibility of compromising the final treated water quality and regulatory compliance. Changes in density and temperature can cause stratification in primary settlers, leading to a decrease in solids' retention and process efficiency. Stratification leads to the accumulation of denser and colder salt water in the bottom of primary settlers, increasing saltwater constituent concentrations (i.e.,
) in primary sludges.
A significant impact of saltwater intrusion arises during sludge anaerobic stabilization in digesters. The primary and biological thickened sludges each represent about 50% (1:1 ratio) of the digester feed, but the main contributor is the primary thickened sludge assessed by its higher electrical conductivity (EC) values. Excess
in thickened sludge leads to higher H2S content in biogas generated. The cogeneration system that uses the biogas stops when the maximum allowed H2S value is exceeded, ceasing both energy generation and heat recovery, lowering the anaerobic digester's temperature. These factors cause difficulties in keeping the anaerobic digestion process stable and efficient. The registered time series datasets from the WWTP enable a correlation to be observed between maximum tide levels in high tide cycles and high H2S content in biogas. The sinusoidal behavior of the two variables is similar and the peak values show a constant pattern of 5 to 7 days' delay between the cycle maximum high tide level and the peak H2S concentration in biogas. This delay is attributed to the digester's hydraulic retention time of 10 to 14 days, which gradually accumulates
, maintaining a complete mix state providing stable inertia that justifies the delay. Some of the buildup
is reduced into H2S in solution, which is transferred to a gaseous phase – biogas – causing the problems mentioned in the cogeneration process.
The impact in WWTP processes has been currently attenuated by dosing ferric chloride (FeCl3) in the plant's headworks during its pre-treatment stage. This strategy has some benefits including the reduction of the organic load into the aeration tanks and lowering the biogas's H2S concentration through ferrous sulfide (FeS) precipitation. The main problem is that tide level variation is highly dynamic. Such variation leads to different saltwater intrusion volumes and loads, which need to be quantified and managed accordingly for an efficient chemical dosage. Local high tide values used for forecasting are forecasted and provided by the Portuguese Instituto Hidrográfico (IH) (Hydrographic Institute). The forecasting, for instance, will assist decision-making on FeCl3 dosage to be applied during different tide cycles in the Tagus Estuary.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Tagus Estuary tide level time series dataset
Tide levels in the Tagus Estuary can be obtained from forecasts on the IH website, which shows high and low tide levels, the day, hour and minute of occurrence, in this case for Lisbon Harbor. These data enable determination of the consecutive tide levels between low and high tides (IH 2017) (see Figure 2). The mathematical expressions provided by IH are presented below.

It is, thus, possible to generate a continuous time series dataset of tide levels covering the study period.
Assessment of EC in the Tagus Estuary near the WWTP
The presence of salt water in WWTP influent can be detected by measuring its EC (APHA 1999; Serrano 2014). The EC of water depends on temperature and, for a typical urban wastewater, is between 680 and 2,038 μS·cm−1 at 20 °C (Metcalf & Eddy 2014). The EC of water from the Atlantic Ocean generally exceeds 40,000 μS·cm−1 at temperatures above 10 °C (Degrémont 1989).
The EC values in the Tagus Estuary near the wastewater collection system were taken from time series datasets from floating water quality stations nearby in the Tagus Estuary (SNIRH/APA). The location of the water quality stations is represented in Figure 3 and their respective EC values summarized in Table 1. The minimum and maximum EC values were assessed for each station's time series dataset and the arithmetic mean calculated for the general minimum and maximum, to obtain an expected EC range for the study area. The results comply with the tidal water movements expected in that part of the estuary, for instance, high EC levels at high tide due to incoming salt water from the Atlantic Ocean through the south side, and lower values at low tide, when ocean water returns and is replaced by less salty waters from the Tagus Estuary and other fresh water sources nearby.
Floating water quality station EC values for the Tagus Estuary (period of record 1999 to 2005)
Water quality station ID . | EC (μS.cm−1) . | ||
---|---|---|---|
Minimum . | Maximum . | ||
1 | ESTEIRO COINA (22C/05) | 25,240 | 44,460 |
2 | ESTEIRO SEIXAL (22C/06) | 29,560 | 45,010 |
3 | TEJO – BÓIA 14B – CANAL BARREIRO (22C/25S) | – | – |
4 | TEJO – WB1 – A (S) (21C/11S) | – | – |
5 | ESTEIRO MOITA (21C/06) | 30,210 | 45,840 |
6 | TEJO – ESTEIROS MOITA/MONTIJO (21C/10) | – | – |
7 | ESTEIRO MONTIJO (21C/07) | 28,730 | 45,260 |
General arithmetic mean | 28,435 | 45,143 |
Water quality station ID . | EC (μS.cm−1) . | ||
---|---|---|---|
Minimum . | Maximum . | ||
1 | ESTEIRO COINA (22C/05) | 25,240 | 44,460 |
2 | ESTEIRO SEIXAL (22C/06) | 29,560 | 45,010 |
3 | TEJO – BÓIA 14B – CANAL BARREIRO (22C/25S) | – | – |
4 | TEJO – WB1 – A (S) (21C/11S) | – | – |
5 | ESTEIRO MOITA (21C/06) | 30,210 | 45,840 |
6 | TEJO – ESTEIROS MOITA/MONTIJO (21C/10) | – | – |
7 | ESTEIRO MONTIJO (21C/07) | 28,730 | 45,260 |
General arithmetic mean | 28,435 | 45,143 |
Local floating water quality stations in the Tagus Estuary, Portugal (source: SNIRH 2017).
Local floating water quality stations in the Tagus Estuary, Portugal (source: SNIRH 2017).
Quantifying the percentage of salt water in WWTP inflow measuring EC
The WWTP influent's EC increases continuously as salt water enters the wastewater collection system. To assess the relationship between WWTP influent's EC and percentage (%) of salt water in the inflow it is necessary to perform laboratory tests. The wastewater samples must be taken while salt water is not entering the collection system network due to high tide levels (i.e., during the transitional period between low and high tide), when the influent's EC values should be near, or below, 2,000 μS·cm−1. The saltwater samples should be collected during the high tide peak level along the coastal area near wastewater collection system infrastructures. The wastewater and saltwater samples should be at room temperature (20 °C) and mixed in 1 L beakers accordingly to meet their respective percentages of salt water in volume (e.g., 0%, 10%, 20%, etc.). The resulting solutions are mixed in a jar-test equipment, or an electromagnetic stirrer, at 120 rpm for 2 min ensuring good mixture thus avoiding any possible stratification, before the solution's EC is measured.
The expected correlation between the influent's EC and percentage of salt water in the WWTP inflow will be similar to a straight line starting at the base line for the expected wastewater EC (see Figure 4). However, it is necessary to be cautious when analyzing the results for mixtures containing high percentages of salt water in terms of flow dynamics in wastewater collection systems. Normally, in the main interceptors wastewater will always be flowing, and it will be difficult to achieve mixtures with high percentages of salt water. Therefore, the high percentage values will generate a slightly curved and uncertain end line. This method is suitable for low to medium percentages of saltwater values, but not recommended for higher values without any thorough concerns.
Expected scatterplot regression line between EC and percentage of salt water in WWTP inflow.
Expected scatterplot regression line between EC and percentage of salt water in WWTP inflow.
Having determined this correlation, the percentage of salt water in the WWTP inflow can be estimated from the influent's EC, enabling the quantification of the volume of salt water in the WWTP inflow from the influent's EC and inflow time series datasets.
Quantifying the saltwater sulfate concentration in WWTP influent by measuring EC
The load is important for the countermeasures to manage saltwater impacts in the WWTP processes, as well as future WWTP mass balance assessments and strategies. The method used is very similar to the one described above, and both should be done simultaneously, ensuring that the EC, percentage of salt water, and
concentration are values measured from the same test solutions. The expected graphical representation is shown in Figure 5.
Expected regression line between EC and sulfate concentration in the WWTP influent.
Expected regression line between EC and sulfate concentration in the WWTP influent.
The correlation found enables estimation of the additional load from the salt water in the WWTP inflow based on the EC time series dataset.
Forecast models based on correlation between the Tagus Estuary tide levels, and WWTP influent's EC, volume of salt water, and sulfate load in the influent
High tide levels in the Tagus Estuary are correlated significantly with saltwater intrusion into the Barreiro/Moita WWTP wastewater collection system. Tide levels can be predicted using the IH tool noted above. The tide level time series dataset is associated with the WWTP inflow and headwork influent's EC time series dataset. Missing data from the WWTP inflow are adjusted using the corresponding hourly average inflow (specific for weekday, holiday, or weekend pattern). Missing influent's EC data cannot be adjusted. With the final time series dataset established, the groundwork has been created for the forecasting models.
The regression lines obtained from the laboratory work, previously described, will be applied to the initial influent's EC time series dataset providing two new time series datasets with the percentage of salt water in the WWTP inflow and concentration in WWTP influent. The methodology is only applied on EC values higher than, approximately, 2,000 μS·cm−1. For lower EC values, it is assumed that saltwater intrusion is not occurring in the wastewater collection system.
The next step of the procedure consists of computation of two more time series datasets that will contain the saltwater volume and load values, which are calculated based on three time series datasets: percentage of salt water in WWTP inflow,
concentration in WWTP influent, and WWTP inflow.
To set up the models, the period between two consecutive high tides is assessed. Then, integrated values of saltwater volume and load are attributed to the period's first high tide level. The relationships between high tides, periods, and influent's EC correlated variables are shown in Figure 6.
High tide level and period correlation, with integration areas for volume of salt water and load.
High tide level and period correlation, with integration areas for volume of salt water and load.
Each period's high tide will correspond to a different volume of salt water and load values, even similar ones, because each period will have a different duration and the WWTP inflow changes during the day, affecting its capacity to dilute salt water. In this time series dataset analysis, it can be noticed that there is a partial lag of variables' synchronization; the small oscillations verified between tide levels and influent's EC arise and are caused by the delays in the wastewater collection network's pumping stations and the network's hydraulic retention time.
The next step is to generate a dataset of the periods' high tide levels selected without any replicates. Then, for each high tide level, the correspondent average values of the volume of salt water and load from the time series dataset that contain the data are calculated: period identification, period correspondent high tide level, and the integrated values of saltwater volume and
load for each period. The dataset generated enables the determination of regression curves that correlate high tide level values with average volume of salt water in the WWTP inflow and
load in WWTP influent (see Figure 7).
Schematic for forecasting the model of volume of salt water and load quantification based on high tide levels.
Schematic for forecasting the model of volume of salt water and load quantification based on high tide levels.
Materials
The influent EC, at the WWTP, was measured using a field probe (Endress+Hauser Indumax CLS50D) in the headworks channel, after the initial pumping station and before any chemical dosage (FeCl3). The EC recorded was corrected to a standard temperature of 20 °C and data stored in a data logger.
The laboratory work was conducted using standard and certified laboratory equipment. EC in the laboratory was measured with a Skalar SP50 multi-sample analyzer and was determined using a Hach Lange DR 3,900 spectrophotometer with Hach Lange Kit TNT 864 [40–150] mg
.L−1, which complies with APHA (1999) standards. For values outside the kit's range, samples with lower volume were diluted with deionized water.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Correlation between EC and percentage of salt water in WWTP inflow
The relationship determined in the laboratory tests between EC and the percentage of salt water in the WWTP inflow (%) is shown in Figure 8 (error bars for 95% significance).
It is noted that the WWTP influent's EC value, when saltwater intrusion was not occurring (i.e., intrusion was 0%), was 2,346 μS·cm−1, which is consistent with field measurements. The results showed a linear behavior as expected. For the 100% value the approximately 40,000 μS·cm−1 value can be seen to be compliant with the expected EC values' interval if the WWTP influent was 100% of salt water from the Tagus Estuary (see Table 1), which, as mentioned before, will not be a real possibility in normal conditions, thus there will always be wastewater flowing through the main interceptors.
Correlation between EC and SO42− concentration in WWTP influent
As mentioned above, the correlation determined in the laboratory tests between EC and concentration was strong. The scatterplot is shown in Figure 9 (error bars for 95% significance).
The lowest concentration found was 79.5 mg
.L−1 (0%), which is normal for wastewaters not affected by saltwater intrusion, but it is a low value compared with this specific WWTP influent's
concentration time series dataset, due to the non-correlation between the plant laboratory's sampling plan and the timing of saltwater intrusion into the wastewater collection system. Samples are always collected at the same time and place, regardless of the tide level in the Tagus Estuary and the subsequent presence of salt water in the influent due to saltwater intrusion.
Forecasting model results and data analysis
The time series dataset for the assessed period was evaluated alongside the forecasting model design process. The monthly time series data assessment comprised the maximum high tide level, the maximum instantaneous percentage of salt water in WWTP inflow, the estimated saltwater volume entering the wastewater collection system and its relative percentage to total WWTP inflow (Table 2). The saltwater volume estimation, determined by integrating saltwater volumes from the time series, might show minor deviations caused by small missing influent EC data, that cannot be adjusted.
Assessment of the time series dataset for saltwater volume quantification
Month (2017) . | Maximum high tide level . | Maximum instantaneous percentage of salt water in WWTP inflow (m3.min−1) . | Estimated saltwater volume entering the wastewater collection system . | Relative percentage to monthly WWTP inflow . |
---|---|---|---|---|
. | m . | % . | m3 . | % . |
April | 4.16 | 53.9 | 20,554 | 3.6 |
May | 4.12 | 46.1 | 16,050 | 2.7 |
June | 4.07 | 45.1 | 12,906 | 2.2 |
July | 4.07 | 33.3 | 8,280 | 1.5 |
Month (2017) . | Maximum high tide level . | Maximum instantaneous percentage of salt water in WWTP inflow (m3.min−1) . | Estimated saltwater volume entering the wastewater collection system . | Relative percentage to monthly WWTP inflow . |
---|---|---|---|---|
. | m . | % . | m3 . | % . |
April | 4.16 | 53.9 | 20,554 | 3.6 |
May | 4.12 | 46.1 | 16,050 | 2.7 |
June | 4.07 | 45.1 | 12,906 | 2.2 |
July | 4.07 | 33.3 | 8,280 | 1.5 |
Although the saltwater intrusion volumes into the wastewater collection system seem low, compared with the monthly WWTP inflow, their impact on various WWTP processes are very significant. Specific instances can give some idea of the dimension of the problem, such as, on 27 April 2017, at 04:40 in the morning, there was a 4.16 m high tide in the Tagus Estuary and later on at 06:56 the percentage of salt water in the WWTP inflow reached a maximum of 53.9%. As a result, during some period of time in that morning, the pumping stations were moving approximately twice the expected wastewater volume, representing significant additional energy consumption and operating costs.
The forecasting models created show strong correlations and will enable an expeditious estimation of both volume of salt water and load, related to high tide level (see Figures 10 and 11).
Scatterplot and exponential regression curve for the average volume of salt water for each high tide level.
Scatterplot and exponential regression curve for the average volume of salt water for each high tide level.
Scatterplot and exponential regression curve for the average load for each high tide level.
Scatterplot and exponential regression curve for the average load for each high tide level.
The mathematical expressions obtained make it possible to forecast the total monthly saltwater volume and load that will flow into the WWTP for the time periods covered by the high tide level values supplied by IH. Table 3 shows the monthly forecast for saltwater volume, and Table 4 for
load.
Monthly forecasts for the saltwater volume
2017 . | 2018 . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month . | Maximum high tide level . | Monthly forecast for saltwater volume from the Tagus Estuary . | Month . | Maximum high tide level . | Monthly forecast for saltwater volume from the Tagus Estuary . |
m . | m3 . | m . | m3 . | ||
1 | 3.97 | 6,262 | 1 | 4.08 | 10,291 |
2 | 3.99 | 7,136 | 2 | 4.11 | 8,621 |
3 | 4.14 | 19,461 | 3 | 4.10 | 13,355 |
4 | 4.16 | 22,988 | 4 | 4.01 | 9,529 |
5 | 4.12 | 15,837 | 5 | 3.93 | 6,826 |
6 | 4.07 | 9,196 | 6 | 3.98 | 6,095 |
7 | 4.07 | 8,132 | 7 | 4.06 | 8,470 |
8 | 4.10 | 10,820 | 8 | 4.17 | 14,852 |
9 | 4.09 | 16,219 | 9 | 4.24 | 22,083 |
10 | 4.13 | 21,236 | 10 | 4.18 | 20,461 |
11 | 4.12 | 19,158 | 11 | 3.96 | 11,781 |
12 | 4.09 | 11,688 | 12 | 3.97 | 7,242 |
Maximum | 4.16 | 22,988 | Maximum | 4.24 | 22,083 |
Total | 168,133 | Total | 139,607 |
2017 . | 2018 . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Month . | Maximum high tide level . | Monthly forecast for saltwater volume from the Tagus Estuary . | Month . | Maximum high tide level . | Monthly forecast for saltwater volume from the Tagus Estuary . |
m . | m3 . | m . | m3 . | ||
1 | 3.97 | 6,262 | 1 | 4.08 | 10,291 |
2 | 3.99 | 7,136 | 2 | 4.11 | 8,621 |
3 | 4.14 | 19,461 | 3 | 4.10 | 13,355 |
4 | 4.16 | 22,988 | 4 | 4.01 | 9,529 |
5 | 4.12 | 15,837 | 5 | 3.93 | 6,826 |
6 | 4.07 | 9,196 | 6 | 3.98 | 6,095 |
7 | 4.07 | 8,132 | 7 | 4.06 | 8,470 |
8 | 4.10 | 10,820 | 8 | 4.17 | 14,852 |
9 | 4.09 | 16,219 | 9 | 4.24 | 22,083 |
10 | 4.13 | 21,236 | 10 | 4.18 | 20,461 |
11 | 4.12 | 19,158 | 11 | 3.96 | 11,781 |
12 | 4.09 | 11,688 | 12 | 3.97 | 7,242 |
Maximum | 4.16 | 22,988 | Maximum | 4.24 | 22,083 |
Total | 168,133 | Total | 139,607 |
Forecast monthly estimates from the model of sulfate load
2018 . | ||
---|---|---|
Month . | Maximum high tide level . | Forecast for the additional ![]() |
m . | kg . | |
1 | 4.08 | 46,212 |
2 | 4.11 | 37,794 |
3 | 4.10 | 54,889 |
4 | 4.01 | 49,008 |
5 | 3.93 | 43,221 |
6 | 3.98 | 37,381 |
7 | 4.06 | 41,580 |
8 | 4.17 | 52,729 |
9 | 4.24 | 64,339 |
10 | 4.18 | 66,902 |
11 | 3.96 | 54,968 |
12 | 3.97 | 43,580 |
Maximum | 4.24 | 66,902 |
Total | 592,603 |
2018 . | ||
---|---|---|
Month . | Maximum high tide level . | Forecast for the additional ![]() |
m . | kg . | |
1 | 4.08 | 46,212 |
2 | 4.11 | 37,794 |
3 | 4.10 | 54,889 |
4 | 4.01 | 49,008 |
5 | 3.93 | 43,221 |
6 | 3.98 | 37,381 |
7 | 4.06 | 41,580 |
8 | 4.17 | 52,729 |
9 | 4.24 | 64,339 |
10 | 4.18 | 66,902 |
11 | 3.96 | 54,968 |
12 | 3.97 | 43,580 |
Maximum | 4.24 | 66,902 |
Total | 592,603 |
The total monthly saltwater volumes estimated in Table 2 and the ones forecasted in Table 3 differ by 11.8% (April), 1.3% (May), 28.7% (June), and 1.3% (July), which is reasonably acceptable and promising. The larger differences arise from missing WWTP influent's EC data. Worth noticing is that weather conditions in the estuary might affect the local tide levels, and the timing of the high tide peak with the dilution effect generated by the WWTP's inflow regime (diurnal or nocturnal) can also contribute to minor deviations.
The forecasting capacity of these forecasting models will be more accurate with larger time series datasets. To maintain quality assurance some precautions should be taken, including regular verification and update, taking account of changes in the wastewater collection system network (e.g., corrective structural changes, aggravation of structural damage, and mean sea level rise).
CONCLUSIONS
Saltwater intrusion into wastewater collection systems is a significant problem. It is generally accepted that the best strategy is mapping and assessing the wastewater collection system's critical sites and taking corrective actions. That can be very time-consuming and expensive for a water utility; however, other strategies might be suitable, such as forecasting models to support WWTP management team decision-making.
The forecasting models created show good correlation between both variables, average volume of salt water in WWTP inflow (0.9145) and average load in WWTP influent added by the saltwater volume (0.9162), with the corresponding estuary's high tide levels. The models will be useful to WWTP management, with respect to both chemical dosing and process stability.
During the study, the highest monthly percentage of salt water in WWTP inflow, related to the monthly inflow, was 3.6%. While this might seem low, it is high enough to cause serious operating problems in the WWTP. On a shorter timescale, some critical situations were detected with elevated percentage of salt water in the WWTP inflow, the highest value being 53.9%, meaning that parts of the wastewater collection system and some pumping stations, briefly, transferred twice the supposed wastewater volume, with consequent increased energy consumption and operating costs. This problem is likely to be aggravated for coastal WWTPs due to mean sea level rise as the consequence of climate changes, and water utilities might need to find short-term adaptative strategies.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The research was developed as part of a master's thesis (Figueiredo 2018) within the partnership between NOVA School of Science and Technology from NOVA University of Lisbon, and the water utility SIMARSUL (Saneamento da Península de Setúbal, S.A.), a subsidiary company from the holding group Águas de Portugal, S.A. This research follows a previous work (Figueiredo et al. 2020) adding forecast models to quantify saltwater intrusion's volume and load providing useful tools for WWTP management teams facing this problem.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.