The assessment of drought hazards is important due to their socio-economic impacts on water resources, agriculture, and ecosystems. In this study, the effects of drought on changing water area and canopy of the Lake Urmia watershed in the northwest of Iran have been monitored and evaluated. For this purpose, the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI) was calculated in short and medium periods (1-month and 3-month) to determine the dry-spell periods in the Lake Urmia basin. In reviewing this analysis, the annual average has been examined and evaluated. Furthermore, Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) and remote sensing data were used to calculate the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI), and the Temperature–Vegetation–Dryness Index (TVDI) to identify the area of water body, water level, and vegetation changes during 20 years (2000–2020). The Pearson correlation coefficient was also employed to explore the relationship between the drought and the remote sensing-derived indices. According to the results of drought analysis, 2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020 had experienced dry spells in the Lake Urmia basin. The NDWI changes also showed that the maximum area of the Lake Urmia happened in 2000, and its minimum was recorded in 2014. The variation of NDVI values showed that the highest values of vegetation cover were estimated to be 2,850 km2 in.2000, and its lowest value was 1,300 km2 in.2014. The maximum EVI and TDVI were calculated in 2000, while their minimum was observed in 2012 and 2014. Also, the correlation analysis showed that the SPI had the highest correlation with NDVI. Meanwhile, 1-month SPI had a higher correlation than the 3-month SPI with NDVI and EVI. As a concluding remark, NDVI and NDWI were more suitable indices to monitor the changes in vegetation and drought-related water area. The results can be used to make sound decisions regarding the rapid assessment of remote sensing-derived data and water-related indices.

  • Performance of the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI)-1 and SPI-3 enriched the better display of drought intensity.

  • Monitoring by different vegetation indices reinforces findings and results.

  • The water level of the Lake Urmia has experienced many changes during the study period.

  • The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) and the Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) have an excellent performance for identifying changes.

  • The SPI has the highest and lowest correlations with the NDVI and the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI).

Drought is a climatic, regional, and occasional phenomenon with three dimensions: intensity, durability, and spatial extent (Palmer 1965; Rossi et al. 1992). The drought hazard is among the natural disasters that affect people's lives and the environment, with continuing and severe consequences (Mishra & Desai 2005). In the past decades, droughts have had devastating effects on ecology, water resources management, and environmental processes (Rojas et al. 2011) and need to be recorded and analyzed extensively. Spatial and temporal monitoring of drought is a complicated process, and it has been developed over some decades (Nalbantis 2008; Diaz et al. 2020). Drought indicators such as water anomalies are used to monitor and identify water scarcity and dry spells (Diaz et al. 2020). The spatial, temporal, and severity (hardness) of drought can be determined using these indicators (Benedetti et al. 1994). Drought hazards can influence meteorological and hydrological components in different spatial and temporal scales.

There are several indicators to assess meteorological drought. These indicators include the Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI), the Standardized Precipitation–Evapotranspiration Index (SPEI), the Soil Moisture Anomaly (SMA), the Drought Severity Index (DSI), the Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI), etc. The SPI is a widely used index to characterize meteorological drought on a range of timescales. On short timescales, the SPI is closely related to soil moisture, while at longer timescales, the SPI can be related to groundwater and reservoir storage. The SPI can be compared across regions with markedly different climates. It quantifies observed precipitation as a standardized departure from a selected probability distribution function that models the raw precipitation data. The raw precipitation data are typically fitted to a gamma or a Pearson Type III distribution, and then transformed to a normal distribution (Yihdego et al. 2019). There are advantages to using this index. It uses precipitation only; and can characterize drought or abnormal wetness at different timescales which correspond with the time availability of different water resources (e.g., soil moisture, snowpack, groundwater, river discharge, and reservoir storage). The more comparable across regions with different climates than the Palmer Severity Drought Index (PDSI), the less complex to calculate than the PDSI (Hao & Singh 2015).

In terms of platforms, the advantages of satellite-based remote sensing include high spatial resolution, which makes possible the extraction of long-time data series of consistent and comparable data, which can be cost-effective. Furthermore, some satellite platforms have free access to visible and multispectral data, such as Landsat 7-8. However, there are two main problems with these platforms for precision agriculture applications, which are related to the per-pixel resolution (30 m2 per pixel for Landsat and 500 m2 for MODIS) and the orbit period (16 days for Landsat and 26 days for SPOT). More recently, pixel resolution has been increased by newer satellites, such as WorldView-2 and -3 (Digital Globe, Longmont, CO, USA). WorldView-2 was the first commercial high-resolution satellite to provide eight spectral sensors in the visible to near-infrared range. Along with the four typical multispectral bands: blue (450–510 nm), green (510–580 nm), red (630–690 nm), and near-infrared (NIR) (770–895 nm), each sensor is narrowly focused on a particular range of the electromagnetic spectrum that is sensitive to a particular feature from the ground or a property of the atmosphere. However, images from this platform can be cost-prohibitive for long-time data series studies (Xue & Su 2017). That's why using MODIS images looks so much better because of its easy access, larger coverage, higher bandwidth, and simpler processing. But if the area is small and the time-series period is less, it is better to use data with higher spatial and spectral accuracy (Bannari et al. 1995).

There are several indicators in the study of drought and vegetation using remote sensing, including the Ratio Vegetation Index (RVI), the Difference Vegetation Index (DVI), the Perpendicular Vegetation Index (PVI), the Vegetation Index (GVI), the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI), the Atmospherically Resistant Vegetation Index (ARVI), the Soil Atmospheric Impedance Vegetation Index (TSARVI), the Transformed Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (TSAVI), the Soil-Adjusted Vegetation Index (SAVI), the Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI), etc. The use of these combined indices, which include NDVI, EVI, TVDI, and Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI) Dubai, is very useful for checking the amount of vegetation and humidity in the area. For these reasons, such as the TVDI, it uses temperature and vegetation at the same time to check the humidity. This index forms a regression relationship between temperature and vegetation to identify wet and dry areas. Vegetation indices, which include EVI and NDVI, identify the vegetation using the reflection rates of red, near-infrared, and green bands. The NDWI is also a moisture and plant index.

Although meteorological and hydrological drought studies have received more attention in recent years, the extension potential for the drought risk has not yet been extensively studied (Gu et al. 2020). Many studies conducted the drought analysis using meteorological indicators and remote sensing data over different climatic conditions. In this regard, Hadian et al. (2017) investigated the effect of drought using satellite images on vegetation and land use around the Maharloo Lake in Fars province. They observed that the highest amount of reduction in vegetation canopy cover and destruction of natural lands has occurred in three different periods (9-, 13-, and 23-year periods). The changes in vegetation cover of the Isfahan province were studied by Safari Shad et al. (2017) by applying MODIS satellite images from 2000 to 2008. They used the NDVI and showed that changes in the NDVI had no significant correlation with agricultural and meteorological drought. Luo et al. (2016) investigated the seasonal variations of the Lake Taihu in China and its impacts on the vegetation regions using Landsat satellite imagery. Their results showed that air temperature directly impacted vegetation growth and growth retardation. Also, the soil water content/moisture assessment can be considered a crucial variable of the soil–atmosphere system, as it affects various processes and has multi-direction feedback within the climate system.

Meanwhile, soil moisture is of significant consequence for the global water–soil–atmosphere cycles. The occurrence of drought events is in close relation to water components, affecting the available water content to vegetation. The Temperature–Vegetation–Dryness Index (TVDI) is a widely used satellite-derived index in monitoring soil water content in different studies.

The relationship of the drought index (SPI) with the Difference Vegetation Index (DVI) and the NDVI (obtained from MODIS sensor images) were examined by Saberi et al. (2018) in West Azerbaijan province, Iran. According to their findings, the SPI had the maximum correlation with the NDVI to determine the dry-period changes. Also, Saberi et al. (2019) investigated the drought in Lake Urmia by analyzing the correlation between the SPI and the NDVI. The results highlighted that the short-term drought indicator in that basin exhibited a remarkable correlation with the monthly NDVI. Zhang et al. (2020) explored the effects of drought on runoff changes in the Ebinur Lake watershed using the NDVI and the NDWI. Their findings indicated that the lake water levels were associated with changes in many variables, and the vegetation in the region experienced significant changes in response to the drought with a significant correlation. In the study of Shamshirband et al. (2020) using machine learning models, Zhao et al. (2018) using GRACE and Wu & Chau (2013) using Modular Soft Computing methods drought and hydrology have been studied.

In the above review, many different studies have analyzed drought in various fields. These studies have examined only one or at most one drought index of distance meteorological drought. In this study, we seek to determine the extent and impact of drought in this area using various indicators. The Urmia region has always been considered due to the many changes that have taken place in its water zone. This is because the water of the Lake Urmia and the amount of drought in this area has a great impact on the agriculture of the two neighboring provinces, especially the province of West Azerbaijan. The Urmia region, especially with the Lake Urmia, has abundant agriculture and fertile soil. The lake is located in the middle of a closed catchment so that all surface and groundwater overflows from the surrounding areas to the lake. The special position of the basin in terms of geology, high evaporation rate, and continuous accumulation of salts in it has led to the transformation of the lake into an extremely saline one. The lake is surrounded by a number of freshwater satellite lagoons. The complex of these wetlands has created an important ecological area around the lake.

The purpose of this study was to monitor the meteorological drought index and its effects on the vegetation and water areas in the Lake Urmia basin, Iran, using Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) images and meteorological data. In this study, between 2000 and 2020, a 2-year interval and an average annual time series were used. The reason for not using the images of newer years such as 2022 is the lack of all images of this year to average the drought for this year. The SPI, NDVI, EVI, NDWI, and TVDI were derived from MODIS data. Also, the correlation analysis was utilized to explore the interdependency among the meteorological and vegetation indices.

Study area

The Lake Urmia watershed is located in northwest Iran with 51,876 km2. The study area lies between 35 °40′ to 38 °30′ N latitude and 47 °53′ to 44 °07′ E longitude (Figure 1). The altitude of the study area ranges from 1,258 to 3,656 m above the mean sea level. The watershed of the Lake Urmia is part of the Great Plateau of Armenia and is heterogeneous in terms of terrain complexity (plain (24%) and mountainous (65%)) and climatic regimes. The mountainous regions of the area are steep and prone to soil erosion and highly flooding. The area of the lake is approximately 11% (Godarzi et al. 2015; Salahi et al. 2017). The water level of the Urmia Lake is on average 1,280 m above sea level, which is the lowest elevation of the basin. Due to its geographical and mountainous position, this basin is regarded as the wettest in Iran. The land uses in the basin include aquifers, pastureland, and agricultural lands ((Heydari Tasheh Kabood et al. 2020). The minimum and maximum temperatures observed in the Urmia Lake basin during the study period are on average 4.3 and 17.7 °C, respectively, with an average annual precipitation of 359.1 mm. The average discharge of the basin is 18.2 m3/s. The geographical location of Lake Urmia and the studied meteorological stations are shown in Figure 1.

Figure 1

The geographical location of the Lake Urmia watershed and the synoptic stations.

Figure 1

The geographical location of the Lake Urmia watershed and the synoptic stations.

Close modal

Data and methodology

The data used in this study include MODIS sensor images aboard the Terra satellite corresponding from 2000 to 2020 (with 2-year time intervals). Several MODIS images were used (Table 1). The satellite image data were obtained from the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) website (https://search.earthdata.nasa.gov/search). The high spectral resolution, wide swath width, and the specific calibration techniques in the MODIS sensor result in higher accuracy in estimating NDVI, NDWI, EVI, and TVDI (Hulka 2008). The images of June (MOD09A1) were used to obtain NDWI. For this reason, this type of data is used to calculate this index because it is not readily available and must be calculated. But other indicators are readily available. Meanwhile, the available MODIS products (MOD13A3, MOD11A2) were used to calculate the annual average of NDVI, EVI, and TVDI.

Table 1

Specifications of satellite images used in this research

AbbreviationSpatial resolutionAbbreviationSpatial resolutionYear
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2000 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2002 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2004 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2006 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2008 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2010 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2012 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2014 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2016 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2018 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2020 
AbbreviationSpatial resolutionAbbreviationSpatial resolutionYear
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2000 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2002 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2004 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2006 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2008 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2010 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2012 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2014 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2016 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2018 
MOD13A3, MOD11A2 1 km MOD09A1 500 m 2020 

Also, the meteorological data were obtained from Iran Meteorological Organization (http://www.irimo.ir/). Monthly precipitation data from eight synoptic stations of the Lake Urmia watershed, which covers all the study regions, were used from 2000 to 2020 to obtain 1-month and 3-month SPI. The locations of synoptic stations are shown in Figure 1. These stations had complete statistical data and non-missing and homogeneous.

The reason for examining remote sensing drought as a multi-year time series is because remote sensing drought does not occur in 1 day and occurs in time series, and also our emphasis on the meteorological drought index is long in time and there is no drought in series. It does not happen for a short time. If it is created, it is cross-sectional. Of course, it is important to note that meteorological data are easier to analyze, so it is given in a lower time series.

The SPI values were calculated based on the data of meteorological stations, and the NDVI, EVI, NDWI, and TVDI were extracted from satellite data to monitor the drought and changes in the lake water area during 2000–2020 as described as follows:

Standardized Precipitation Index (SPI)

The SPI is a drought index to determine the difference between observed precipitation and the long-term average. It can be calculated at different timescales according to the purpose of the study. This index is considered the effects of precipitations deficiency on water resources, groundwater, soil moisture, and river flow through a response lag-time (McKee et al. 1995). Mathematically, the SPI is calculated based on the cumulative probabilities of precipitation at one meteorological station for the desired period. The SPI has been widely used to assess the drought condition in different climatic regions (MacKee et al. 1993). The gamma distribution function is fitted to long-term precipitation data to calculate SPI values. After performing the necessary calculations and determining the relevant parameters, the SPI values were obtained using the following equations:
(1)
(2)
where H(x) is the cumulative probability of precipitation obtained from the gamma distribution. Also, the constants of the above equations are defined as , , , , , and (MacKee et al. 1993). The classification scheme used for SPI is described in Table 2.
Table 2

Classification of the SPI (MacKee et al. 1993)

SPI valuesCategory
<2 Extremely wet 
1.5–1.99 Very wet 
1–1.49 Moderately moist 
0.5–0.99 Mild damp 
−0.49 to 0.5 Almost normal 
−1.49 to −1 Mild dry 
−1.49 to −1 Moderate dry 
−1.99 to −1.5 Very dry 
SPI valuesCategory
<2 Extremely wet 
1.5–1.99 Very wet 
1–1.49 Moderately moist 
0.5–0.99 Mild damp 
−0.49 to 0.5 Almost normal 
−1.49 to −1 Mild dry 
−1.49 to −1 Moderate dry 
−1.99 to −1.5 Very dry 

Normalized Difference Water Index (NDWI)

Since the NDWI effectively measures moisture content, it is often compared with the NDMI, also known as NDWI GAO. In fact, there is a major difference in how the two are calculated and used. The NDMI makes use of the NIR–SWIR (near-infrared and short-wave infrared) combination to enhance the presence of water in the leaves of plants. The NDWI, on the other hand, is calculated using the GREEN–NIR (visible green and near-infrared) combination, which allows it to detect subtle changes in the water content of the water bodies.

The NDWI was proposed by McFeeters in 1996. Its primary use today is to detect and monitor slight changes in the water content of the water bodies. Taking advantage of the NIR (near-infrared) and GREEN (visible green) spectral bands, the NDWI is capable of enhancing the water bodies in a satellite image. The downside of the index is that it is sensitive to build structures, which can lead to the overestimation of water bodies (McFeethers 1996), which is presented in Equation (3).
(3)

Green refers to the green band, and NIR stands for the near-infrared band. In MODIS data, NIR, RED, and Green represent band 1, band 2, and band 5, respectively. These index values vary between −1 and +1, theoretically values of water bodies are larger than 0.5. Vegetation has much smaller values, which results in distinguishing vegetation from water bodies easier. Built-up features have positive values between 0 and 0.2. The NDWI values correspond to the following ranges:

  • 0.2–1: water surface,

  • 0.0–0.2: flooding, humidity,

  • − 0.3 to 0.0: moderate drought, non-aqueous surfaces,

  • − 1 to −0.3: drought, non-aqueous surfaces.

The Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI)

The NDVI is one of the most practical indices emphasizing the interaction between changes in the amount of canopy cover of biomass, chlorophyll content, and water stress. Equation (4) was used to calculate NDVI values of the satellite images (Kriegler et al. 1969).
(4)

NIR and RED reflect the near-infrared and red bands, respectively, and these index values vary between −1 and +1, theoretically (Saeidi et al. 2014). The negative value of the NDVI specifies the presence of barren land and water, while the dense green canopy results in high NDVI values because of a high concentration of chlorophyll with low reflectance in the red band (Pradhan & Lee 2010).

Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI)

Hewitt and Liu first introduced the EVI in 1994. This indicator minimizes the atmospheric effects, soil background, and blue and red reflectance differences and is defined as Equation (5) (Hodel 2012).
(5)
where L is the soil adjustment factor, C1 and C2 are the coefficients used to correct the aerosol dispersion in the red and blue bands, and RED, BLUE, and NIR are the atmospherically corrected reflectance in red, blue near-infrared wavelengths. Generally, the values are G = 2.5, C1 = 6, C2 = 7.5, and L = 1. The value of EVI ranges from −1 to 1. The EVI is very useful in analyzing crop yield forecasting, crop growth pattern and mapping the crop phenology, and detecting land use land cover target features.

Temperature–Vegetation Dryness Index (TVDI)

The conceptual space of Temperature–Vegetation is plotted in Figure 2; the image pixels with the same amount of sunlight exposure and different canopy are located at the edges, which are dry and saturated (Price 1990). The land surface with zero to dense vegetation, a specific amount of moisture, and a unique slope are included in Figure 2. It means that for each line with a certain slope, a particular amount of moisture can be considered, and TVDI is one of the popular indices and explains the temperature–vegetation distribution pattern (Long & Singh 2012). TVDI, as soil moisture and land surface dryness indicator, is calculated based on the NDVI and surface temperature (TS) and is a scattering trapezoidal shape depending on weather and vegetation conditions. The correct parameters of a model require some information about climatic conditions of the region to determine the edges of the evaporative triangle, mainly when images with a coarse spatial resolution are being used (1,000 meters’ pixel-size or coarser resolutions). This index can be calculated according to Equation (6) (Sandholt et al. 2002).
(6)
in which TS is the land surface temperature, TSmax has been calculated by Equation (7), and TSmin is the minimum land surface temperature.
(7)
Figure 2

Conceptual space of the evaporation triangle indicator, concerning the relationship between surface temperature (TS) and vegetation index (NDVI); TVDI, Temperature–Vegetation–Dryness Index (Sandholt et al. 2002).

Figure 2

Conceptual space of the evaporation triangle indicator, concerning the relationship between surface temperature (TS) and vegetation index (NDVI); TVDI, Temperature–Vegetation–Dryness Index (Sandholt et al. 2002).

Close modal

In Equation (7), the NDVI is the vegetation index obtained from Equation (4). Also, the coefficient a and the slope line b are determined using the least-squares fitting between temperature and vegetation. The values of this moisture index are between zero and one variable where the more it moves toward one, the wetter the area and the closer it gets to zero, the drier the area.

Error matrix estimation

Error estimation and accuracy estimation are usually based on statistical parameters extracted from the error matrix. The error matrix is also called the Confusion Matrix. The result is a pixel-by-pixel comparison of known pixels (in terrestrial reality) with the corresponding pixels in the results. The label of each known pixel is compared to the corresponding pixel label. Then, the same results are added together and labels that do not match are also calculated (Fathy et al. 2011).

Kappa coefficient

Kappa is a discrete multivariate technique that is used to evaluate accuracy for statistical decisions if one error matrix is significantly different from another. The result of kappa analysis is the KHAT or K index, which is an index for measuring classification accuracy based on the difference between the actual accuracy in the error matrix and the accuracy variables represented by the sum of rows and columns.
(8)

In cases where the real (observed) agreement approaches one and the probable agreement approaches zero, the value of K approaches one, which is ideal (Fathy et al. 2011).

Consequently, the NDVI, EVI, NDWI, and TVDI were calculated by ArcGIS software from MODIS data. The drought condition was characterized by using estimation of SPI during the available recorded period (2000–2020) in the study area. Then, the correlation between drought and the satellite-derived indices was examined by using the Pearson correlation technique.

The SPI variations values at 1-month and 3-month scales in the meteorological stations of the study area have been shown in Figure 3.

Figure 3

The values of 1-month and 3-month SPI in the meteorological stations of the study area.

Figure 3

The values of 1-month and 3-month SPI in the meteorological stations of the study area.

Close modal

The results of SPI (Figure 3) for eight synoptic stations in two short periods (1 and 3 months) showed that a dry period occurred in the Lake Urmia basin, and the amount of precipitation was less than average in all corresponding years (2000, 2002, 2004, 2006, 2008, 2010, 2012, 2014, 2016, 2018, and 2020). In terms of specific stations, the meteorological stations in Urmia, Oshnaviyeh, and Tabriz exhibited more fluctuations than other stations in the entire region. Frequent changes in 1-month SPI (1 month) and 3-month SPI (3 months) almost fluctuated similarly between the values of ±2. However, 3-month SPI showed fewer variations in some stations due to its geographic characteristics. Generally, it can be interpreted that 1-month SPI and 3-month SPI identified the almost years as dry-spell over the available time series.

The results of changes in NDWI for different 2-year time intervals have been shown in Figures 4 and 5. The results revealed that the maximum area of Lake Urmia was recorded in 2000 (with an area of 4,950 km2). Meanwhile, the minimum area was measured in 2014 with a value of 1,750 km2. According to the results, it was evident that the lake area has continuously decreased from 4,950 km2 (2000) to 1,750 km2 (2014) and in 2020 increased to 2,850 km2.

Figure 4

Changes in the NDWI at the level of the Lake Urmia watershed.

Figure 4

Changes in the NDWI at the level of the Lake Urmia watershed.

Close modal
Figure 5

Lake Urmia area changes using the NDWI in the study period.

Figure 5

Lake Urmia area changes using the NDWI in the study period.

Close modal

However, a significant decline exists in the year 2014. The accuracy of the NDWI from MODIS images during the dry period was assessed using the kappa coefficient and overall accuracy measures (O.A) based on Google Earth images and the areas of the lake that the Urmia Lake Rehabilitation Organization has reported. The results of the accuracy assessment are given in Table 3. According to the accuracy values (Table 3), the accuracy of NDWI values varies between 0.86 and 0.95. The highest accuracy belonged to 2006 at the level of 0.95, and the lowest was recorded as 0.86 for the year 2000.

Table 3

Accuracy assessment changes of the NDWI extraction to determine the water area in the watershed of Lake Urmia

Year20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020
Kappa coefficient 0.86 0.94 0.90 0.95 0.94 0.90 0.92 0.93 0.89 0.91 0.88 
O.A (%) 87.34 95.22 91.31 96.41 94.18 91.47 92.79 93.79 90.79 91.79 89.79 
Year20002002200420062008201020122014201620182020
Kappa coefficient 0.86 0.94 0.90 0.95 0.94 0.90 0.92 0.93 0.89 0.91 0.88 
O.A (%) 87.34 95.22 91.31 96.41 94.18 91.47 92.79 93.79 90.79 91.79 89.79 

The maps of the NDVI values for different 2-year time intervals have been shown in Figure 6. According to the NDVI maps, the NDVI values in 2000, 2002, 2004, and 2006 were almost the same. The maximum NDVI values were between 0.8 and 1. While, in 2012 and 2014, the NDVI decreased to about 0.75. In other words, the changes in the NDVI in the last years of the study period, especially 2014–2018, have had more and decreasing changes. With an increase in the NDVI values in 2018 and 2020, the NDVI values of the last years reached a maximum value of 0.9.

Figure 6

The NDVI maps through the given years in the Lake Urmia watershed.

Figure 6

The NDVI maps through the given years in the Lake Urmia watershed.

Close modal

Table 4 examines the area of each class of NDVI. In this way, it is between −0.2 and 0 class one, 0 and 0.3 class two, 0.3 and 0.5 class three, and 0.5 and 1 fourth class. According to the results, we have had many changes in the study of time series in different classes. As can be seen, in 2000, on the −0.2 to 0 floor, its area was 5,020 km2. Also in 2020, the area of the same floor was 2,890 hectares. The highest dense vegetation was in 2000 and 2002, respectively, and the lowest dense vegetation was in 2014 and 2016, respectively.

Table 4

The amount of the area of each user in different classes of its index in the NDVI

Year Classes Area (km2) 2002 Classes Area (km2) 2004 Classes Area (km2) 
2000 −0.2 to 0 5,020  −0.2 to 0 4,720  −0.2 to 0 4,500 
0–0.3 41,500  0–0.3 42,100  0–0.3 42,810 
0.3–0.5 2,554  0.3–0.5 2,259  0.3–0.5 2,114 
0.5–1 2,900  0.5–1 2,895  0.5–1 2,550 
2006 Classes Area (km2) 2008 Classes Area (km2) 2010 Classes Area (km2) 
 −0.2 to 0 4,210  −0.2 to 0 3,855  −0.2 to 0 2,940 
 0–0.3 43,400  0–0.3 44,310  0–0.3 45,120 
 0.3–0.5 2,028  0.3–0.5 1,809  0.3–0.5 2,013 
 0.5–1 2,336  0.5–1 2,000  0.5–1 1,901 
2012 Classes Area (km2) 2014 Classes Area (km2) 2016 Classes Area (km2) 
 −0.2 to 0 2,301  −0.2 to 0 1,640  −0.2 to 0 1,710 
 0–0.3 45,500  0–0.3 46,900  0–0.3 46,100 
 0.3–0.5 2,281  0.3–0.5 2,584  0.3–0.5 2,744 
 0.5–1 1,892  0.5–1 1,350  0.5–1 1,420 
2018 Classes Area (km2) 2020 Classes Area (km2)    
 −0.2 to 0 2,310  −0.2 to 0 2,890    
 0–0.3 45,520  0–0.3 44,300    
 0.3–0.5 2,559  0.3–0.5 3,064    
 0.5–1 1,585  0.5–1 1,720    
Year Classes Area (km2) 2002 Classes Area (km2) 2004 Classes Area (km2) 
2000 −0.2 to 0 5,020  −0.2 to 0 4,720  −0.2 to 0 4,500 
0–0.3 41,500  0–0.3 42,100  0–0.3 42,810 
0.3–0.5 2,554  0.3–0.5 2,259  0.3–0.5 2,114 
0.5–1 2,900  0.5–1 2,895  0.5–1 2,550 
2006 Classes Area (km2) 2008 Classes Area (km2) 2010 Classes Area (km2) 
 −0.2 to 0 4,210  −0.2 to 0 3,855  −0.2 to 0 2,940 
 0–0.3 43,400  0–0.3 44,310  0–0.3 45,120 
 0.3–0.5 2,028  0.3–0.5 1,809  0.3–0.5 2,013 
 0.5–1 2,336  0.5–1 2,000  0.5–1 1,901 
2012 Classes Area (km2) 2014 Classes Area (km2) 2016 Classes Area (km2) 
 −0.2 to 0 2,301  −0.2 to 0 1,640  −0.2 to 0 1,710 
 0–0.3 45,500  0–0.3 46,900  0–0.3 46,100 
 0.3–0.5 2,281  0.3–0.5 2,584  0.3–0.5 2,744 
 0.5–1 1,892  0.5–1 1,350  0.5–1 1,420 
2018 Classes Area (km2) 2020 Classes Area (km2)    
 −0.2 to 0 2,310  −0.2 to 0 2,890    
 0–0.3 45,520  0–0.3 44,300    
 0.3–0.5 2,559  0.3–0.5 3,064    
 0.5–1 1,585  0.5–1 1,720    

This index is similar to that in the NDVI, except that it uses additional wavelengths to correct the oscillation error of the radiation angle in the NDVI calculation, which includes atmospheric conditions (distortions in the reflection of light by aerosol particles and signals that are emitted from the ground cover under vegetation) and by considering these factors, this index solves some problems. The reason for this high index in some years and vice versa is low in many hours of the time series due to drought and lack of rainfall in the region, as is evident in the results of the meteorological drought index.

The annual average of EVI values in different time intervals is shown in Figure 7. According to the EVI result, the highest value was observed in 2000 by 0.7, while its lowest value was observed in 2012 and 2014. As mentioned above, changes in the rate of this index have been greatly affected by dry conditions and its values have decreased significantly in 2014.

Figure 7

The EVI maps through the given years in the Lake Urmia watershed.

Figure 7

The EVI maps through the given years in the Lake Urmia watershed.

Close modal

To obtain dense vegetation in the area using vegetation index, we have set values higher than 0.5 according to Professor Jensen's book as dense vegetation. The values of occupied area by dense vegetation cover for the Urmia Lake basin in consecutive 2-year time intervals have been shown in Figure 8. Obviously, a decreasing trend in the canopy cover was observed from 2000 to 2020. According to the results, dense vegetation was 2,850 km2 in the year 2000. In 2012, the area of dense vegetation reached 1,700 km2, and consider the amount of vegetation reached the lowest amount of 1,300 km2 in 2014. An increasing trend has been observed following 2014.

Figure 8

The variations of dense vegetation area in the Lake Urmia watershed from 2000 to 2020.

Figure 8

The variations of dense vegetation area in the Lake Urmia watershed from 2000 to 2020.

Close modal

The reason for using 3 years and bringing the different line coefficients has been the high number of changes this year, also in fact we have mentioned only these 3 years in the article just to show these coefficients. In principle, coefficients have been obtained for all years. Also, Figure 9 is just 2 years as an example. The relationship between the land surface temperature (TS) and NDVI in the months of the 3 selected years is given in Table 5. According to the first month of 2002, the coefficient and slope line were −12.903 and 8.293, respectively (Figure 9 and Table 5), whereas, in the first month of 2014, the coefficient was equal to −20.172 and 26.985. Furthermore, in the first month of 2020, the coefficient was equal to −15.806, and the slope line was 24.014. According to the obtained line coefficients, it can be said that year 2002 underwent higher humidity than 2014 and 2020.

Table 5

The parameters of the relationship between TSmin and TVDI values

YearMonthWet edge min TSDry edge max TS
2002 Jan  0.87 
Feb  0.89 
Mar 15  0.93 
Apr 21  0.82 
May 21  0.79 
Jun 35  0.97 
Jul 35  0.90 
Aug 34  0.88 
Sep 28  0.84 
Oct 20  0.96 
Nov  0.91 
Dec  0.90 
2014 Jan  0.72 
Feb  0.88 
Mar  0.90 
Apr 17  0.93 
May 25  0.98 
Jun 34  0.85 
Jul 34  0.79 
Aug 37  0.92 
Sep 25  0.90 
Oct 21  0.94 
Nov  0.80 
Dec  0.83 
2019 Jan  0.80 
Feb  0.82 
Mar  0.75 
Apr 12  0.88 
May 23  0.87 
Jun 31  0.70 
Jul 36  0.90 
Aug 36  0.92 
Sep 33  0.95 
Oct 20  0.88 
Nov 13  0.97 
Dec  0.83 
YearMonthWet edge min TSDry edge max TS
2002 Jan  0.87 
Feb  0.89 
Mar 15  0.93 
Apr 21  0.82 
May 21  0.79 
Jun 35  0.97 
Jul 35  0.90 
Aug 34  0.88 
Sep 28  0.84 
Oct 20  0.96 
Nov  0.91 
Dec  0.90 
2014 Jan  0.72 
Feb  0.88 
Mar  0.90 
Apr 17  0.93 
May 25  0.98 
Jun 34  0.85 
Jul 34  0.79 
Aug 37  0.92 
Sep 25  0.90 
Oct 21  0.94 
Nov  0.80 
Dec  0.83 
2019 Jan  0.80 
Feb  0.82 
Mar  0.75 
Apr 12  0.88 
May 23  0.87 
Jun 31  0.70 
Jul 36  0.90 
Aug 36  0.92 
Sep 33  0.95 
Oct 20  0.88 
Nov 13  0.97 
Dec  0.83 
Figure 9

Relationship between sea level temperature (TS) and NDVI in September 2002 and 2014.

Figure 9

Relationship between sea level temperature (TS) and NDVI in September 2002 and 2014.

Close modal

In the TVDI index, which is based on the amount of temperature and vegetation, we examine the amount of moisture. This index creates a regression relationship between vegetation and temperature to obtain moisture, which decreases with increasing vegetation and vice versa. The maps of the TVDI values during the study period are shown in Figure 10. The maximum soil moisture value was 1 and 0.9 in the years 2000–2006, respectively. In comparison, the lowest value of TVDI was obtained in 2014 with a maximum coefficient of 0.5. From 2008 to 2012, the maximum changes of TVDI were between 0.8 and 0.7. On the other hand, in 2016, 2018, and 2020, the maximum humidity increased compared to 2014 and reached 0.7 and 0.8. Based on the results, the number of changes in soil moisture corresponded to decreasing or increasing. In 2014, the reason for the lack of moisture was the lack of vegetation, rising temperatures, and more droughts. This indicator is in the wet at the bottom of the graph, because when the vegetation is high and the temperature is low, it is wet. These numbers in Table 5 are the same line coefficients in the negative and positive slopes. A full description of these two wet and dry edges is described above.

Figure 10

The TVDI maps of the study area in consecutive years in the study period.

Figure 10

The TVDI maps of the study area in consecutive years in the study period.

Close modal

Figure 11 shows the correlation of NDWI, NDVI, EVI, and TVDI with 1-month SPI values. These inter-relationships can be interpreted as the drought's direct and significant impact on the satellite-derived indices. The correlation coefficients of NDWI, NDVI, EVI, and TVDI with 1-month SPI values were calculated to be 0.85, 0.9, 0.72, and 0.75, respectively, which indicates the meaningful effects of drought on different vegetation and water-related indices in the study area.

Figure 11

Correlation of different indices ((a) NDWI, (b) NDVI, (c) EVI, and (d) TVDI) with the 1-month SPI values in the Urmia Lake watershed.

Figure 11

Correlation of different indices ((a) NDWI, (b) NDVI, (c) EVI, and (d) TVDI) with the 1-month SPI values in the Urmia Lake watershed.

Close modal

Likewise, the relationship of NDVI, NDWI, EVI, and TVDI with 3-month SPI is shown in Figure 12. Accordingly, the correlation of NDWI, NDVI, EVI, and TVDI with 3-month SPI was calculated to be 0.81, 0.88, 0.70, and 0.75, respectively. Most importantly, the correlation analysis of 1-month SPI and 3-month SPI meteorological drought indices showed a strong connection with obtained indices from remote sensing data and satellite imagery. An analogy between 1-month SPI and 3-month SPI indicates that the 1-month SPI had a higher correlation with NDVI, NDWI, EVI, and TVDI in the study area. Moreover, the highest value of correlation coefficient was observed among 1-month SPI and NDVI values.

Figure 12

Correlation of different indices ((a) NDWI, (b) NDVI, (c) EVI, and (d) TVDI) with the 3-month SPI values in the Urmia Lake watershed.

Figure 12

Correlation of different indices ((a) NDWI, (b) NDVI, (c) EVI, and (d) TVDI) with the 3-month SPI values in the Urmia Lake watershed.

Close modal

Figures 13 and 14 show the correlation matrix of 1-month and 3-month SPI values over the meteorological stations in the study area. The presented scatterplot matrices in R quickly provide a sense of the correlations among the studied data.

Figure 13

Correlation matrix of the 1-month SPI values among different meteorological stations in the study area.

Figure 13

Correlation matrix of the 1-month SPI values among different meteorological stations in the study area.

Close modal
Figure 14

Correlation matrix of the 3-month SPI values among different meteorological stations in the study area.

Figure 14

Correlation matrix of the 3-month SPI values among different meteorological stations in the study area.

Close modal

The correlation coefficient, p-value of the variable ‘i’ and variable ‘j’ for each ij combination were shown in the graph. Also, the histograms, kernel density overlays, absolute correlations, and significance asterisks (at 0.05, 0.01, and 0.001 levels) can make detailed interpretations.

Figure 15 shows the multiple correlation matrix of NDWI values with overall average values of other independent variables, including 1- and 3-month SPI, NDVI, EVI, and TVDI, based on the data obtained from different periods in the study area.

Figure 15

Correlation matrix of the relationship between NDWI and independent variables; 1- and 3-month SPI, NDVI, EVI, and TVDI values.

Figure 15

Correlation matrix of the relationship between NDWI and independent variables; 1- and 3-month SPI, NDVI, EVI, and TVDI values.

Close modal

The Taylor diagram of the relationships of the NDWI with average values of other independent variables, including 1- and 3-month SPI, NDVI, EVI, and TVDI, is presented in Figure 16. The Taylor diagrams are a way of graphically summarizing the closeness of the pattern of some data set. This type of diagram presents concise statistical properties of how well patterns match each other based on their correlation, their root-mean-square (RMS) difference, and the value of their variances (Taylor 2001). Since the plotted values are derived from different timescales, and the different variables, including SPI values, NDWI, NDVI, EVI, and TDVI, have varying numerical values, the results are normalized. The normalized variances ratio indicates the model's relative amplitude and observed variations.

Figure 16

Taylor diagram of the relationship between NDWI and independent variables; 1- and 3-month SPI, NDVI, EVI, and TVDI values.

Figure 16

Taylor diagram of the relationship between NDWI and independent variables; 1- and 3-month SPI, NDVI, EVI, and TVDI values.

Close modal

Figure 16 shows the different correlations of remote sensing and meteorological indicators. These indicators, especially the meteorological drought index, which indicates changes in rainfall in the region, clearly show the effects of reduced rainfall on the region, especially water resources and vegetation. Also, the soil surface moisture obtained in the remote sensing index confirms the results of the meteorological drought index. The results show this correlation between remote sensing indices and meteorological drought index, especially the NDWI and the soil surface moisture index.

According to the results, the TVDI values correlated with the NDWI and lower RMS difference values. This indicates that the TVDI can be considered a good measure to detect the variation of NDWI and the Urmia Lake water area. This inference made by people like Shashikant et al. (2021) and Xue & Su (2017) has been reviewed and approved. This finding means that the TVDI is a suitable measure to estimate the soil moisture meaningfully affected by vegetation cover, as reported in different studies. In this regard, Chen et al. (2015) reported that the TVDI could indicate soil moisture conditions under different tree species and different types of land cover from low to high percentage in the Laoshan forest in Nanjing, China. Yang et al. (2017) proved that the MODIS-derived improved TVDI (iTVDI) can be used as a more accurate measure to drought monitoring in Yunnan Province, China. The iTVDI had introduced as a new index to drought awareness in other areas.

Also, the SPI values in 1-month and 3-month timescales are suitable indicators to interpretations on water area variations over the study area. Similar findings have been reported in Kubicz's (2018) study and Wang et al. (2018). According to Kubicz (2018), the evaluation of current water deficits in surface watercourses and groundwaters is complex. The application of SPI to monitor hydrological and hydrogeological drought requires assessing the level of the correlation between drought indices in the study area. Wang et al. (2018), through applying correlation analysis, showed that 3- and 6-month timescales were the most suitable measures for water area response in the Poyang Lake Basin, China. They also pointed out that the lake level variations to meteorological drought provide a reasonable scientific basis for surface water resource management in similar basins. According to the interpretation of the Taylor diagram, the NDVI and EVI having lower correlation coefficients and higher RMS values are the last explanatory variables in the variation of the Urmia Lake level. In the above results, according to research and meteorological drought indicators and remote sensing, 2000 was the wettest year and 2014 was the driest. The numerous droughts and reduced rainfall and water levels in the region in 2014 has caused the current situation.

As a prolonged climatic phenomenon and severe natural disaster, drought occurs almost everywhere and significantly impacts vegetation cover and water bodies. Therefore, this study explored the effects of drought on vegetation changes and water areas (waterbody area) in the Lake Urmia watershed for 20 years (2000–2020). In this regard, the SPI drought index and NDWI, NDVI, EVI, and TVDI were calculated and analyzed. The results of the SPI in two timescales (1 and 3 months) identified the drought years. The NDWI results also emphasized that 2000 and 2014 had experienced the maximum and minimum areas for the waterbody, respectively. Indeed, these changes are due to changes in vegetation cover in the study area. As reflected by NDWI, the lake was at its maximum water area (in 2000), and at the same time, the highest vegetated areas were identified by NDVI and EVI maps.

In contrast, the minimum areas of the lake and vegetation cover were derived in 2014 based on the calculated indices. The soil moisture in the region was also assessed using temperature and vegetation index (TVDI). To a great extent, changes in TVDI values were directly related to the areas of waterbody and canopy with the maximum and minimum values in 2000 and 2014, respectively. The correlation of SPI-1 and SPI-3 with remote sensing indices confirmed that the SPI displayed the most and most negligible correlations with NDVI and EVI, respectively. The higher correlation in SPI-1 rather than SPI-3 indicated the effect of drought on vegetation changes in the study area. It is suggested to use NDVI and NDWI to record and detect the changes in water bodies and canopies for proper monitoring and appropriate decision-making in the region. Comparatively, our outcomes were in agreement with studies by Zhang et al. (2020), Saberi et al. (2018), RifatAhmed & Akter (2017), and Nanzad et al. (2019).

According to results, the TVDI amounts with a higher correlation with the NDWI, and lower RMS difference values are a suitable measure to assess the changes in the water area of the Urmia Lake. The TVDI has reasonably corresponded with soil moisture and also vegetation cover. The 1-month and 3-month SPI values are suitable indicators to predict the water area variations over the study area, which has been proved by the results of the correlation analysis at a significant level. The NDVI and EVI measures are meaningful indices in interpreting variation of the Urmia Lake level. Using multiple indices and satellite images provides a comprehensive quantitative assessment of the relevant variable on the Urmia Lake water area variation. In this study, MODIS data has been used to study the drought of the region that has low spatial accuracy, and it is recommended to use images with high spatial accuracy. In this research, the interval between 2 years and the average of that year has been studied. It is recommended to study the drought as a monthly average. It is also recommended that hybrid drought indicators be used to improve outcomes.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

Bannari
A.
,
Morin
D.
,
Bonn
F.
&
Huete
A.
1995
A review of vegetation indices
.
Remote Sensing Reviews
13
(
1–2
),
95
120
.
Benedetti
R.
,
Rossini
P.
&
Taddei
R.
1994
Vegetation classification in the middle Mediterranean area by satellite data
.
International Journal of Remote Sensing
15
(
3
),
583
596
.
Chen
S.
,
Wen
Z.
,
Jiang
H.
,
Zhao
Q.
,
Zhang
X.
&
Chen
Y.
2015
Temperature vegetation dryness index estimation of soil moisture under different tree species
.
Sustainability
7
,
11401
11417
.
Diaz
V.
,
Gerald
A.
,
Perez
C.
,
Henny
A. J.
,
Lanen
V.
,
Solomatine
D.
&
Varouchakis
E. A.
2020
An approach to characterise spatio-temporal drought dynamics
.
Advances in Water Resources
137
,
103512
.
Fathy
M. E.
,
Hussein
A. S.
&
Tolba
M. F.
2011
Fundamental matrix estimation: a study of error criteria
.
Pattern Recognition Letters
32
(
2
),
383
391
.
Godarzi
M.
,
Salahi
B.
&
Hosseini
S. A.
2015
The effect of climate change on surface runoff changes (case study: Oroomeyeh)
.
Ecohydrology
2
,
175
189
.
Gu
L.
,
Chen
J.
,
Yin
J.
,
Xu
C. H. Y.
&
Chen
H.
2020
Drought hazard transferability from meteorological to hydrological propagation
.
Journal of Hydrology
585
,
124761
.
Hadian
F.
,
Hosseini
Z.
&
Hadian
M.
2017
Exploring the effect of recent droughts on reducing the level and changing the use of lands surrounding Maharlou Lake by means of satellite images
.
Journal of Plant and Ecology
12
(
49
),
41
55
.
Hao
Z.
&
Singh
V. P.
2015
Drought characterization from a multivariate perspective: a review
.
Journal of Hydrology
527
,
668
678
.
Heydari Tasheh Kabood
S.
,
Hosseini
S. A.
&
Heydari Tasheh Kabood
A.
2020
Investigating the effects of climate change on stream flows of Urmia Lake basin in Iran
.
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
6
(
1
),
329
339
.
Hodel
E.
2012
Analysing Land Cover Change in Mongolia Using Terra MODIS Satellite Data
.
Doctoral Dissertation
,
Verlag nicht ermittelbar
.
Hulka
J.
2008
Calibrating ASTER for snow cover analysis
. In:
11th AGILE International Conference on Geographic Information Science 2008
.
University of Girona
,
Spain
.
Kriegler
F. J.
,
Malila
W. A.
,
Nalepka
R. F.
&
Richardson
W.
1969
Preprocessing transformations and their effects on multispectral recognition
. In
6th International Symposium on Remote Sensing of Environment
.
University of Michigan
,
Ann Arbor, MI
, pp.
97
131
.
Long
D.
&
Singh
V. P.
2012
A two-source trapezoid model for evapotranspiration (TTME) from satellite imagery
.
Remote Sensing of Environment
121
,
370
388
.
Luo
J.
,
Li
X.
,
Ma
R.
,
Li
F.
,
Duan
H.
,
Hu
W.
,
Qin
B.
&
Huang
W.
2016
Applying remote sensing techniques to monitoring seasonal and interannual changes of aquatic vegetation in Taihu Lake, China
.
Ecological Indicators
60
,
503
513
.
Mackee
T. B.
,
Doesken
J.
&
Kleist
J.
1993
The relationship of drought frequency and duration to time scales, preprints
. In
8th Conference on Applied Climatology
,
17–22 January
,
Anaheim, CA
, pp.
379
384
.
McFeeters
S. K.
1996
The use of normalized difference water index (NDWI) in the delineation of open water features
.
International Journal of Remote Sensing
17
(
7
),
1425
1432
.
McKee
T. B.
,
Doesken
N. J.
&
Kleist
J.
1995
Drought monitoring with multiple time scales
. In:
Proceedings of the 9th Conference on Applied Climatology
,
15–20 January
,
Dallas, TX
.
American Meteorological Society
, pp.
233
236
.
Mishra
A. K.
&
Desai
V. R.
2005
Drought forecasting using stochastic models
.
Journal Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
19
(
5
),
326
339
.
Nalbantis
I.
2008
Evaluation of a hydrological drought index
.
Journal European Water
23
(
24
),
67
77
.
Nanzad
L.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Tuvdendorj
B.
,
Nabil
M.
,
Zhang
S.
&
Bai
Y.
2019
NDVI anomaly for drought monitoring and its correlation with climate factors over Mongolia from 2000 to 2016
.
Journal of Arid Environments
164
,
69
77
.
Palmer
W. C.
1965
Meteorological Drought
, Vol.
30
.
US Department of Commerce, Weather Bureau, Washington, DC
.
Price
J. C.
1990
Using spatial context in satellite data to infer regional scale evapotranspiration
.
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
28
,
940
948
.
Rojas
O.
,
Vrieling
A.
&
Rembold
F.
2011
Assessing drought probability for agricultural areas in Africa with coarse resolution remote sensing imagery
.
Remote Sensing of Environment
115
(
2
),
343
352
.
Rossi
G.
,
Benedini
M.
,
Tsakiris
G.
&
Giakoumakis
S.
1992
On regional drought estimation and analysis
.
Water Resources Management
6
,
249
277
.
Saberi
A.
,
Soltanigordfaramarzi
S.
&
Miryaghoubzadeh
M. H.
2018
Study of drought using meteorological and remote sensing data (Azarbaijan province)
.
Journal of Earth and Space Physics
44
(
2
),
439
461
.
Saberi
A.
,
Gholami
L.
,
Kavian
E. A.
&
Qheysoori
M.
2019
Evaluation of meteorological drought in Urmia Lake basin using meteorological indicators and remote sensing technique
. In:
4th Conference on Watershed Science and Engineering
,
Urmia, Iran
.
Saeidi
V.
,
Pradhan
B.
,
Idrees
M. O.
&
Latif
Z. A.
2014
Fusion of airborne LiDAR with multispectral SPOT 5 image for enhancement of feature extraction using Dempster–Shafer theory
.
IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
52
(
10
),
6017
6025
.
Safari shad
M.
,
Habibnejad roshan
M.
&
Ildoromi
A.
2017
Evaluation of NDVI index for drought monitoring, using remote sensing technique (case study: Isfahan province)
.
Geographical data
25
(
100
),
35
44
.
Salahi
B.
,
Goudarzi
M.
&
Hosseini
S. A.
2017
Predicting the temperature and precipitation changes during the 2050 s in Urmia Lake Basin
.
Watershed Engineering and Management
8
(
4
),
425
438
.
Shamshirband
S.
,
Hashemi
S.
,
Salimi
H.
,
Samadianfard
S.
,
Asadi
E.
,
Shadkani
S.
,
Kargar
K.
,
Mosavi
A.
,
Nabipour
N.
&
Chau
K. W.
2020
Predicting standardized streamflow index for hydrological drought using machine learning models
.
Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
14
(
1
),
339
350
.
Shashikant
V.
,
Mohamed Shariff
A. R.
,
Wayayok
A.
,
Kamal
M. R.
,
Lee
Y. P.
&
Takeuchi
W.
2021
Utilizing TVDI and NDWI to classify severity of agricultural drought in Chuping, Malaysia
.
Agronomy
11
(
6
),
1243
.
Taylor
K. E.
2001
Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram
.
Journal of Geographical Research
106
(
D7
),
7183
7192
.
Wu
C. L.
&
Chau
K. W.
2013
Prediction of rainfall time series using modular soft computing methods
.
Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence
26
(
3
),
997
1007
.
Xue
J.
&
Su
B.
2017
Significant remote sensing vegetation indices: a review of developments and applications
.
Journal of Sensors
2017
,
1
17
.
Yang
R.
,
Wang
H.
,
Hu
J.
,
Cao
J.
&
Yang
Y.
2017
An improved temperature vegetation dryness index (iTVDI) and its applicability to drought monitoring
.
Journal of Mountain Science
14
(
11
),
2284
2294
.
Yihdego
Y.
,
Vaheddoost
B.
&
Al-Weshah
R. A.
2019
Drought indices and indicators revisited
.
Arabian Journal of Geosciences
12
(
3
),
1
12
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).