Direct sowing and deficit irrigation practices can reduce the effect of wastewater on CO2 emissions from soil by providing carbon savings. Therefore, the effect of domestic recycled wastewater uses at different levels in irrigation under conventional tillage and direct sowing practices on the CO2 emission from soil at the end of the vegetation period of silage maize was investigated by comparing it with full irrigation of fresh water. Both organic carbon and CO2 emissions in the second year in fully irrigated treatments were higher than those in the first year. The CO2 emission in the full irrigation with wastewater (0.263 g m−2 h−1), compared to full irrigation with fresh water and 33 and 67% deficit irrigations with wastewater, was higher at 23.4, 25.0, and 59.3%, respectively. Direct sowing practice also (0.193 g m−2 h−1) resulted in 17.0% less CO2 emissions compared to conventional tillage. The positive linear relationships of H2O emission and the soil moisture content at different depths (5, 10, and 20 cm) with CO2 emission were significant, and the negative relationships with the soil temperatures were also found. It has been concluded that deficit irrigation and direct sowing applications can be practical for reducing CO2 emissions from soil in wastewater irrigation conditions.

  • Wastewater irrigation increases soil organic carbon content and thus CO2 emissions.

  • Direct sowing and deficit irrigation are the practices for declining CO2 emissions.

  • Soil moisture content positively affects CO2 emissions in irrigated conditions.

Agriculture is the sector that consumes the most fresh water resources compared to other sectors (FAO 2020). For this reason, it is very important to use marginal water resources instead of fresh water in agriculture to conserve fresh water resources. Wastewater, one of the marginal water resources (Cakmakci & Sahin 2021), can be defined as water that has been polluted as a result of various uses, and the properties have changed partially or completely. Wastewater increases soil and crop productivity with irrigation in terms of its rich nutrient content. In addition, the wastewater, which reduces the need for fertilizers, contributes to environmental sustainability through disposal also.

While the nutritive properties of wastewater are considered as positive advantages, the high organic matter contribution of wastewater to the soil may increase CO2 emissions from soil (Rosso & Stenstrom 2008). It is estimated that about 10% of the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere is released from the soil (Raich & Potter 1995). Although CH4 and N2O cause global warming 21 times and 310 times more than CO2, respectively (Forster et al. 2007), the 82% share of CO2 among greenhouse gases makes it the most important greenhouse gas. It is very worrying that the amount of CO2, around 280 ppm in the atmosphere in the 1700s, reached 406 ppm in 2017 (WMO 2019). It is thought that if the amount of CO2 continues to increase at this rate, it would reach 450 ppm in 2050, and as a result, agricultural, social, and economic life would be adversely affected (Aksay et al. 2005).

The agricultural sector causes 25% of global warming (Tubiello et al. 2015; Vurarak & Bilgili 2015). Many factors such as soil temperature, soil water content, and O2 level have an effect on CO2 emissions from soil. Soil tillage has a significant share in increasing agricultural greenhouse gases (Abdalla et al. 2016). Soil tillage provides a suitable environment for microbial activities and increases the speed of these activities by increasing the oxygen level of the soil and by ensuring that the surface residues come into closer contact with the soil particles (Vurarak & Bilgili 2015). However, direct sowing or minimum tillage contributes to both reducing emissions and increasing soil and crop productivity by providing moisture and carbon sequestration in the soil (Kocyigit 2008). In addition, considering the possibility of increased CO2 emissions with soil moisture, CO2 emissions can be reduced with an easy and practical approach in deficit irrigation (Hou et al. 2020).

It has been determined that no findings from previous studies about the effect of deficit wastewater irrigation in direct sowed silage maize on the CO2 emissions during the harvesting period were reported. In this context, the effect of using domestic treated wastewater at different levels (100, 67, and 33%) in the irrigation of silage maize under conventional tillage and direct sowing on the CO2 emission from soil at the end of the vegetation period was investigated. In addition, the relationship of CO2 emission with H2O emission, soil moisture, and soil temperature at this period was evaluated. Therefore, the hypothesis of this study was that (1) direct sowing would decrease CO2 emissions from soil by providing carbon savings, (2) deficit irrigation might increase the benefit to reduce CO2 emission, and (3) CO2 emission would show a strong correlation with H2O emission, soil moisture content, and soil temperature.

This study was conducted at the Experimental Field of the Faculty of Agriculture, Van Yuzuncu Yil University, for 2 years. The experimental area is a semi-arid region and located at an altitude of 1,670 m near Lake Van (38° 34′35″ N and 43° 17′26″ E). The total precipitation amount measured in the experimental area in the vegetation period of silage maize in 2020 and 2021 was 37.0 and 52.1 mm, respectively. The mean air temperature during the vegetation period was 22.4 °C in 2020 and 22.8 °C in 2021.

Each plot was planned with five rows, 70 cm×15 cm row spacing, and measuring 3.5 m × 7.2 m. The experiment was carried out according to the split plots design. The main plot factor of the experiment was conventional tillage and direct sowing, and sub-plot factors include full irrigations with fresh water and wastewater (FW100 and WW100), and 33% (WW67) and 67% (WW33) deficit irrigations with wastewater, in three replications. Therefore, 24 plots were arranged in the experimental field.

The seeds of silage maize (cv ‘OSSK 644’) in trial years were sown in May and harvested in September. The conventional tillage plots were plowed, then the clods were broken down by using a cultivator-rotary harrow combination and the plots were leveled. The seeds were sowed with a precision sowing machine on the same day after soil tillage. In the direct sowing treatment, the seeds were sowed with a direct sowing machine on the same day as conventional tillage. The hoeing in conventional tillage plots in both years was carried out twice as crop heights reached 15–20 and 40–50 cm.

Irrigation applications were carried out with a surface drip irrigation system placed one lateral to each crop row at 70 cm intervals. Laterals with in-line drippers with a flow rate of 2.3 l h−1 and 33 cm spacing were used. The fresh water used in the study was obtained from tap water in the university campus. Recycled wastewater was collected from the Van city Edremit Domestic Wastewater Treatment Plant and transported before each irrigation and brought to the experimental area. The average values of soil reaction (pH), electrical conductivity (EC), biological oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD), and total N of the domestic wastewater throughout the irrigation periods in trial years were 7.58, 1.124 dS m−1, 23.2 mg l−1, 37.5 mg l−1, and 10.9 mg l−1, respectively. The pH and EC values for fresh water were 8.15 and 0.353 dS m−1.

In all plots, the crops were irrigated with fresh water equally with a 30% wetting percentage considering 30 cm soil depth until they get 40–50 cm height. After this stage, irrigation with wastewater at different water deficit levels was started and continued until the harvest with a 65% wetting percentage considering 90 cm soil depth. A total of 13 and 12 irrigations were made in the first and second years of the experiment, respectively. The plots fully irrigated reached the seasonal irrigation quantities of 351.3 mm in the first year and 327.3 mm in the second year in the conventional tillage practice. In the direct sowing practice, the irrigation quantities of 318.7 and 294.1 mm were applied in the first and second trial years.

The soil texture in the experimental area was sandy clay loam. While the soil organic carbon contents in the 0–30 cm soil layer at the harvest were determined at 1.0, 1.15, 1.05, and 0.88% in the FW100, WW100, WW67, and WW33 treatments in the first year, respectively, and the second year values were 1.04, 1.24, 1.07, and 0.91%. The carbon contents in the first year were found to be 1.0% in direct sowing and 1.03% in conventional tillage practice, and 1.06 and 1.07% in the second year. Organic matter determined with the Walkley-Black method was converted to organic carbon using the standard coefficient (Nelson & Sommers 1982; Setyanto et al. 2004; Avramidis et al. 2015).

The CO2 emissions from the soil in all plots were measured at the time of silage maize harvest in September. The measurements were made by an infrared gas analyzer device (EGM-5, PPSystems, Stotfold, UK) from three different points randomly selected from each plot with three replicates between two crops, approximately 15–20 cm from the dripper. In addition, soil temperatures and moisture contents at 5, 10, and 20 cm soil depths and the H2O emissions were measured simultaneously with CO2 emission measurement. The measurement of H2O emission was provided automatically by the device, and a temperature probe connected to the CO2 measurement device was used in soil temperature measurements. Soil moisture contents were determined using the TDR probe (Trime-Pico, IPH/T3, IMKO) calibrated to the experimental field.

The data were evaluated by variance analysis (ANOVA) using SPSS software (v23.0). Correlograms with a scatterplot, correlation coefficient, and variable distribution were built using the RStudio package to determine the relationships of CO2 emission with H2O emission and soil moisture and temperatures.

The results indicated that the effects of irrigation and soil tillage-sowing practices on CO2 emission were significant (Figure 1 and Table 1). In both years, full irrigation with wastewater and conventional tillage had the highest CO2 emissions (Figure 1). While the CO2 emissions in the second year were found higher than the first year values in all irrigation treatments in conventional tillage practice, the CO2 emissions higher than the first year were determined under fully irrigated conditions in the direct sowing practice. It could be said that the high organic carbon contents in the second year can appear in this finding. However, deficit irrigation treatments in direct sowing conditions probably resulted in fewer CO2 emissions in the second year due to a change in the organic matter dynamics by affecting soil biology (Li et al. 2010). On a 2-year average, the CO2 emission in the WW100 treatment (0.263 g m−2 h−1) was found to be 23.4, 25.0, and 59.3% higher, respectively, compared to FW100, WW67, and WW33 treatments. Direct sowing (0.193 g m−2 h−1) practice resulted in 17.0% fewer CO2 emissions than the conventional tillage.
Table 1

The variance analysis results for CO2 and H2O emissions, and soil moisture and temperature values in trial years

2020
SourcedfCO2
H2O
Moisture (5 cm)
Moisture (10 cm)
Mean squarePMean squarePMean squarePMean squareP
Tillage (T) 0.006 0.021 1.870 0.141 0.403 0.496 0.271 0.209 
Irrigation (I) 0.008 0.002 13.249 0.000 3.126 0.032 0.099 0.609 
T×I 0.001 0.674 1.374 0.194 0.106 0.942 0.074 0.708 
Error 16 0.001  0.779  0.829  0.158  
SourcedfMoisture (20 cm)Temperature (5 cm)Temperature (10 cm)Temperature (20 cm)
Mean squarePMean squarePMean squarePMean squareP
Tillage (T) 0.810 0.214 3.682 0.172 2.802 0.147 0.510 0.596 
Irrigation (I) 2.657 0.009 3.921 0.131 3.712 0.057 6.478 0.033 
T×I 0.044 0.964 0.194 0.954 0.536 0.724 1.097 0.606 
Error 16 0.484  1.804  1.203  1.741  
2021 
SourcedfCO2H2OMoisture (5 cm)Moisture (10 cm)
Mean squarePMean squarePMean squarePMean squareP
Tillage (T) 0.013 0.000 0.020 0.908 1.777 0.155 0.311 0.242 
Irrigation (I) 0.012 0.000 17.779 0.000 19.726 0.000 24.909 0.000 
T×I 0.001 0.390 0.235 0.923 0.033 0.988 0.006 0.993 
Error 16 0.001  1.482  0.797  0.211  
SourcedfMoisture (20 cm)Temperature (5 cm)Temperature (10 cm)Temperature (20 cm)
Mean squarePMean squarePMean squarePMean squareP
Tillage (T) 0.670 0.353 8.760 0.003 3.227 0.024 0.920 0.344 
Irrigation (I) 29.392 0.000 6.714 0.001 9.741 0.000 12.668 0.000 
T×I 0.239 0.806 0.889 0.311 1.408 0.080 0.918 0.440 
Error 16 0.731  0.688  0.519  0.966  
2020–2021 
SourcedfCO2H2OMoisture (5 cm)Moisture (10 cm)
Mean squarePMean squarePMean squarePMean squareP
Tillage (T) 0.009 0.000 0.540 0.371 0.976 0.188 0.288 0.099 
Irrigation (I) 0.010 0.000 15.141 0.000 9.453 0.000 6.831 0.000 
T×I 0.000 0.131 0.154 0.865 0.037 0.974 0.013 0.933 
Error 16 0.000  0.637  0.516  0.094  
SourcedfMoisture (20 cm)Temperature (5 cm)Temperature (10 cm)Temperature (20 cm)
Mean squarePMean squarePMean squarePMean squareP
Tillage (T) 0.746 0.250 6.202 0.007 3.010 0.019 0.770 0.264 
Irrigation (I) 12.370 0.000 5.241 0.002 6.358 0.000 9.274 0.000 
T×I 0.118 0.877 0.287 0.727 0.280 0.607 0.850 0.258 
Error 16 0.522  0.652  0.446  0.575  
2020
SourcedfCO2
H2O
Moisture (5 cm)
Moisture (10 cm)
Mean squarePMean squarePMean squarePMean squareP
Tillage (T) 0.006 0.021 1.870 0.141 0.403 0.496 0.271 0.209 
Irrigation (I) 0.008 0.002 13.249 0.000 3.126 0.032 0.099 0.609 
T×I 0.001 0.674 1.374 0.194 0.106 0.942 0.074 0.708 
Error 16 0.001  0.779  0.829  0.158  
SourcedfMoisture (20 cm)Temperature (5 cm)Temperature (10 cm)Temperature (20 cm)
Mean squarePMean squarePMean squarePMean squareP
Tillage (T) 0.810 0.214 3.682 0.172 2.802 0.147 0.510 0.596 
Irrigation (I) 2.657 0.009 3.921 0.131 3.712 0.057 6.478 0.033 
T×I 0.044 0.964 0.194 0.954 0.536 0.724 1.097 0.606 
Error 16 0.484  1.804  1.203  1.741  
2021 
SourcedfCO2H2OMoisture (5 cm)Moisture (10 cm)
Mean squarePMean squarePMean squarePMean squareP
Tillage (T) 0.013 0.000 0.020 0.908 1.777 0.155 0.311 0.242 
Irrigation (I) 0.012 0.000 17.779 0.000 19.726 0.000 24.909 0.000 
T×I 0.001 0.390 0.235 0.923 0.033 0.988 0.006 0.993 
Error 16 0.001  1.482  0.797  0.211  
SourcedfMoisture (20 cm)Temperature (5 cm)Temperature (10 cm)Temperature (20 cm)
Mean squarePMean squarePMean squarePMean squareP
Tillage (T) 0.670 0.353 8.760 0.003 3.227 0.024 0.920 0.344 
Irrigation (I) 29.392 0.000 6.714 0.001 9.741 0.000 12.668 0.000 
T×I 0.239 0.806 0.889 0.311 1.408 0.080 0.918 0.440 
Error 16 0.731  0.688  0.519  0.966  
2020–2021 
SourcedfCO2H2OMoisture (5 cm)Moisture (10 cm)
Mean squarePMean squarePMean squarePMean squareP
Tillage (T) 0.009 0.000 0.540 0.371 0.976 0.188 0.288 0.099 
Irrigation (I) 0.010 0.000 15.141 0.000 9.453 0.000 6.831 0.000 
T×I 0.000 0.131 0.154 0.865 0.037 0.974 0.013 0.933 
Error 16 0.000  0.637  0.516  0.094  
SourcedfMoisture (20 cm)Temperature (5 cm)Temperature (10 cm)Temperature (20 cm)
Mean squarePMean squarePMean squarePMean squareP
Tillage (T) 0.746 0.250 6.202 0.007 3.010 0.019 0.770 0.264 
Irrigation (I) 12.370 0.000 5.241 0.002 6.358 0.000 9.274 0.000 
T×I 0.118 0.877 0.287 0.727 0.280 0.607 0.850 0.258 
Error 16 0.522  0.652  0.446  0.575  
Figure 1

CO2 emissions in 2020, 2021, and the mean of two years. FW100, full irrigation with fresh water; WW100, full irrigation with wastewater; WW67, wastewater irrigation with 33% water deficit; WW33: wastewater irrigation with 67% water deficit. Different lowercase or uppercase letters in each trial year indicate a difference at the level of 0.05.

Figure 1

CO2 emissions in 2020, 2021, and the mean of two years. FW100, full irrigation with fresh water; WW100, full irrigation with wastewater; WW67, wastewater irrigation with 33% water deficit; WW33: wastewater irrigation with 67% water deficit. Different lowercase or uppercase letters in each trial year indicate a difference at the level of 0.05.

Close modal

The higher CO2 emissions in the WW100 treatment and the decrease in emission values under deficit irrigation can be explained by the rich nutrient content of the wastewater and by the lower entering of nutrients from the wastewater to the soil under decreased irrigation conditions. In particular, the high amount of organic carbon with wastewater earned to the soil can be considered as the main cause of CO2 emissions. The content of organic carbon in the WW100 treatment was 16.5, 13.2, and 34.8% higher than the FW100, WW67, and WW33 treatments, respectively. The organic carbon accumulated in the soil encounters O2, and it turns into CO2 form and leaves the soil, and spreads to the atmosphere (Yerli et al. 2019). Similarly, Rosso & Stenstrom (2008) and Kudal & Muftuoglu (2014) reported that irrigation with wastewater increases the amount of organic carbon in the soil. Shakeel et al. (2021) determined that the highest CO2 emission in maize cultivation was obtained from the raw wastewater plots and the lowest CO2 emission was obtained from the plots irrigated with fresh water. Nosalewicz et al. (2013) stated that CO2 emissions from the soil increased in wastewater irrigation conditions and this increase was related to the high organic matter contribution provided to the soils depending on the nutrient content of the wastewater.

The increased CO2 emissions in conventional tillage can be explained with intensive soil tillage increasing the O2 entry into the soil, thereby accelerating the oxidation of organic carbon. Therefore, in the direct sowing practice, organic carbon content was 2.0% higher than in conventional tillage, showing that the increasing carbon stock in the soil reduced CO2 emissions. It is also thought that less emission under direct sowing practice is related to the direct sowing of the seed and thus to the more superficial intervention in the soil. Vurarak & Bilgili (2015) reported that soil tillage creates a suitable environment for microbial activities both by increasing the O2 level of the soil and by enabling the surface residues to come into closer contact with the soil particles. Altikat et al. (2012) expressed that organic carbon decomposition increased with increased soil tillage due to physically breaking up the soil and providing better aeration. Akbolat et al. (2016) determined that the CO2 emissions in direct sowing conditions were 30.6% lower than the conventional tillage, and pointed out that CO2 emission from the soil in direct sowing is less due to less O2 entry into the soil.

It was thought that insignificant effects of tillage-sowing practices on soil moisture content resulted in similar H2O emissions. However, the irrigation practices had a significant effect on soil moisture contents and thus H2O emissions (Figure 2, and Tables 1 and 2).
Table 2

Soil moisture contents and soil temperatures measured at 5, 10, and 20 cm soil depths in trial years

Treatments2020
2021
2020–2021
CTDSMeanCTDSMeanCTDSMean
Soil moisture content at 5 cm (m3 m−3FW100 0.224 0.228 0.226 AB 0.233 0.239 0.236 A 0.228 0.233 0.231 A 
WW100 0.230 0.235 0.232 A 0.239 0.245 0.242 A 0.234 0.240 0.237 A 
WW67 0.219 0.220 0.219 B 0.217 0.221 0.219 B 0.218 0.220 0.219 B 
WW33 0.216 0.216 0.216 B 0.198 0.205 0.202 C 0.207 0.211 0.209 C 
Mean 0.222 0.225  0.222 0.227  0.222 0.226  
Soil moisture content at 10 cm (m3 m−3FW100 0.233 0.237 0.235 0.242 0.244 0.243 B 0.238 0.240 0.239 B 
WW100 0.237 0.236 0.237 0.247 0.250 0.249 A 0.242 0.243 0.243 A 
WW67 0.233 0.235 0.234 0.232 0.234 0.233 C 0.232 0.234 0.233 C 
WW33 0.232 0.236 0.234 0.202 0.204 0.203 D 0.217 0.220 0.219 D 
Mean 0.234 0.236  0.231 0.233  0.232 0.234  
Soil moisture content at 20 cm (m3 m−3FW100 0.251 0.256 0.254 A 0.258 0.265 0.262 A 0.255 0.261 0.258 A 
WW100 0.253 0.256 0.255 A 0.263 0.266 0.265 A 0.258 0.261 0.260 A 
WW67 0.245 0.250 0.247 AB 0.245 0.250 0.247 B 0.245 0.250 0.247 B 
WW33 0.239 0.241 0.240 B 0.217 0.215 0.216 C 0.228 0.228 0.228 C 
Mean 0.247 0.251  0.246 0.249  0.246 0.250  
Soil temperature at 5 cm (°C) FW100 22.1 21.1 21.6 23.9 21.7 22.8 C 23.0 21.4 22.2 B 
WW100 22.1 20.9 21.5 23.0 22.6 22.8 C 22.6 21.8 22.2 B 
WW67 22.5 21.9 22.2 24.7 23.3 24.0 B 23.6 22.6 23.1 B 
WW33 23.4 23.0 23.2 24.4 24.6 24.5 A 23.9 23.8 23.9 A 
Mean 22.5 21.7  24.0 A 23.1 B  23.3 A 22.4 B  
Soil temperature at 10 cm (°C) FW100 21.0 20.7 20.9 23.6 21.4 22.5 C 22.3 21.1 21.7 C 
WW100 21.7 20.4 21.1 22.3 22.4 22.3 C 22.0 21.4 21.7 C 
WW67 22.2 21.1 21.7 23.7 23.3 23.5 B 23.0 22.2 22.6 B 
WW33 22.6 22.6 22.6 24.7 25.0 24.8 A 23.6 23.8 23.7 A 
Mean 21.9 21.2  23.6 A 23.0 B  22.7 A 22.1 B  
Soil temperature at 20 cm (°C) FW100 20.9 19.8 20.4 B 22.8 21.3 22.0 C 21.9 20.6 21.2 C 
WW100 20.6 20.5 20.5 B 21.8 22.1 22.0 C 21.2 21.3 21.3 C 
WW67 21.5 22.4 22.0 AB 23.6 23.6 23.6 B 22.6 23.0 22.8 B 
WW33 22.8 22.1 22.5 A 24.2 24.0 24.1 A 23.5 23.0 23.3 A 
Mean 21.5 21.2  23.1 22.7  22.3 22.0  
Treatments2020
2021
2020–2021
CTDSMeanCTDSMeanCTDSMean
Soil moisture content at 5 cm (m3 m−3FW100 0.224 0.228 0.226 AB 0.233 0.239 0.236 A 0.228 0.233 0.231 A 
WW100 0.230 0.235 0.232 A 0.239 0.245 0.242 A 0.234 0.240 0.237 A 
WW67 0.219 0.220 0.219 B 0.217 0.221 0.219 B 0.218 0.220 0.219 B 
WW33 0.216 0.216 0.216 B 0.198 0.205 0.202 C 0.207 0.211 0.209 C 
Mean 0.222 0.225  0.222 0.227  0.222 0.226  
Soil moisture content at 10 cm (m3 m−3FW100 0.233 0.237 0.235 0.242 0.244 0.243 B 0.238 0.240 0.239 B 
WW100 0.237 0.236 0.237 0.247 0.250 0.249 A 0.242 0.243 0.243 A 
WW67 0.233 0.235 0.234 0.232 0.234 0.233 C 0.232 0.234 0.233 C 
WW33 0.232 0.236 0.234 0.202 0.204 0.203 D 0.217 0.220 0.219 D 
Mean 0.234 0.236  0.231 0.233  0.232 0.234  
Soil moisture content at 20 cm (m3 m−3FW100 0.251 0.256 0.254 A 0.258 0.265 0.262 A 0.255 0.261 0.258 A 
WW100 0.253 0.256 0.255 A 0.263 0.266 0.265 A 0.258 0.261 0.260 A 
WW67 0.245 0.250 0.247 AB 0.245 0.250 0.247 B 0.245 0.250 0.247 B 
WW33 0.239 0.241 0.240 B 0.217 0.215 0.216 C 0.228 0.228 0.228 C 
Mean 0.247 0.251  0.246 0.249  0.246 0.250  
Soil temperature at 5 cm (°C) FW100 22.1 21.1 21.6 23.9 21.7 22.8 C 23.0 21.4 22.2 B 
WW100 22.1 20.9 21.5 23.0 22.6 22.8 C 22.6 21.8 22.2 B 
WW67 22.5 21.9 22.2 24.7 23.3 24.0 B 23.6 22.6 23.1 B 
WW33 23.4 23.0 23.2 24.4 24.6 24.5 A 23.9 23.8 23.9 A 
Mean 22.5 21.7  24.0 A 23.1 B  23.3 A 22.4 B  
Soil temperature at 10 cm (°C) FW100 21.0 20.7 20.9 23.6 21.4 22.5 C 22.3 21.1 21.7 C 
WW100 21.7 20.4 21.1 22.3 22.4 22.3 C 22.0 21.4 21.7 C 
WW67 22.2 21.1 21.7 23.7 23.3 23.5 B 23.0 22.2 22.6 B 
WW33 22.6 22.6 22.6 24.7 25.0 24.8 A 23.6 23.8 23.7 A 
Mean 21.9 21.2  23.6 A 23.0 B  22.7 A 22.1 B  
Soil temperature at 20 cm (°C) FW100 20.9 19.8 20.4 B 22.8 21.3 22.0 C 21.9 20.6 21.2 C 
WW100 20.6 20.5 20.5 B 21.8 22.1 22.0 C 21.2 21.3 21.3 C 
WW67 21.5 22.4 22.0 AB 23.6 23.6 23.6 B 22.6 23.0 22.8 B 
WW33 22.8 22.1 22.5 A 24.2 24.0 24.1 A 23.5 23.0 23.3 A 
Mean 21.5 21.2  23.1 22.7  22.3 22.0  

CT, conventional tillage; DS, direct sowing; FW100, full irrigation with fresh water; WW100, full irrigation with wastewater; WW67, wastewater irrigation with 33% water deficit; WW33, wastewater irrigation with 67% water deficit.

Different uppercase letters indicate a difference at the level of 0.05.

Figure 2

H2O emissions in 2020, 2021, and the mean of two years. FW100, full irrigation with fresh water; WW100, full irrigation with wastewater; WW67, wastewater irrigation with 33% water deficit; WW33, wastewater irrigation with 67% water deficit. Different lowercase letters in each trial year indicate a difference at the level of 0.05.

Figure 2

H2O emissions in 2020, 2021, and the mean of two years. FW100, full irrigation with fresh water; WW100, full irrigation with wastewater; WW67, wastewater irrigation with 33% water deficit; WW33, wastewater irrigation with 67% water deficit. Different lowercase letters in each trial year indicate a difference at the level of 0.05.

Close modal

In the average trial years, while the WW100 and FW100 treatments provided similar H2O emissions and soil moisture contents, H2O emissions in the WW100 treatment (12.6 g m−2 h−1) compared to the WW67 and WW33 treatments were found to be 16.7 and 34.0% higher, respectively (Figure 2). The soil moisture at 5, 10, and 20 cm soil depths in WW100 (0.237–0.260 m3 m−-3) also were 5.3–8.2% and 13.4–14.0% higher compared to WW67 and WW33 treatments, respectively (Table 2). It was concluded that the proportion of reduction in H2O emission with the water deficit was greater than the proportion of reduction in soil moisture content, and this indicated that high soil moisture contents contributed more to H2O emission. The increased H2O emissions in high irrigation conditions due to increased soil moisture content were also determined in previous studies. Akbolat & Senyigit (2012) reported that H2O emissions decreased due to the decrease in the occupancy rate of the pores with increasing deficit irrigation levels. Senyigit & Akbolat (2010) also, in their study examining the effects of varying amounts of irrigation water on H2O emissions, stated that the lowest H2O emissions were obtained from the lowest amount of irrigation quantity.

The correlations of CO2 emissions with H2O emissions and soil moisture contents measured at 5, 10, and 20 cm soil depths were significantly positively linear in both conventional tillage and direct sowing practices (Figures 3 and 4). Similarly, Buragiene et al. (2019) reported that CO2 emissions from the soil showed a positive linear change in the soil moisture content. It was thought that increased microbial activity with increased soil moisture causes decomposition of organic matter and thus increases CO2 emissions. Similarly, Jabro et al. (2008) reported that CO2 emissions increase with the increased moisture in the soil due to increased organic matter oxidation. Soil moisture balance and processes greatly influence the amount of organic carbon oxidation in the soil (Shi & Marschner 2014). Especially in arid and semi-arid regions, re-wetting the dried soil can increase emissions by triggering microbial activities (Lamparter et al. 2009). Entry et al. (2008) determined that the continuous supply of water to the soil provides more organic carbon to the soil from crop roots and crop residues, and thus, the emissions increase. Mancinelli et al. (2015), in their study in which they examined the CO2 emissions in 100, 75, and 50% irrigation water levels, stated that the CO2 emissions from the soil decreased with the decrease in the amount of irrigation.
Figure 3

Correlation matrix in conventional tillage. ***, **, and *: Significant at the level of 0.001, 0.01, and 0.05, respectively.

Figure 3

Correlation matrix in conventional tillage. ***, **, and *: Significant at the level of 0.001, 0.01, and 0.05, respectively.

Close modal
Figure 4

Correlation matrix in direct sowing. ***, **, and *: Significant at the level of 0.001, 0.01, and 0.05, respectively.

Figure 4

Correlation matrix in direct sowing. ***, **, and *: Significant at the level of 0.001, 0.01, and 0.05, respectively.

Close modal

In the average trial years, while soil temperatures at 5 and 10 cm soil depths changed significantly by the tillage-sowing practices, the significant effects of irrigation treatments were determined in all measuring depths (Table 2). Soil temperatures at 5 and 10 cm soil depths in direct sowing practice (22.1–22.4 °C) were 3.9 and 2.6% less than the conventional tillage. Soil temperatures in all depths were similar in FW100 and WW100 treatments. The soil temperatures at 5, 10, and 20 cm soil depths under WW100 treatment (21.3–22.2 °C) were 3.9–6.6%, 7.1–8.6%, and 6.6–8.6% lower than the values in WW67 (22.6–23.1 °C) and WW33 (23.3–23.9 °C) treatments, respectively. The higher soil temperature in deficit irrigation can be explained by the lower moisture content in the soil considering significant negative correlations between soil moisture and temperatures (Figures 2 and 3). High moisture content in the soil can reduce the soil temperature by creating a cooling effect in the soil with increased evaporation (Mancinelli et al. 2015). The soil temperature in direct sowing is lower than in conventional tillage can be evaluated in relation to the fact that using the shading effect of the residues on the soil surface in direct sowing reduces the soil temperature. Shen et al. (2018) stated that the soil temperature was lower between 0 and 1.5 °C due to the covering effect of residues on the soil surface in direct sowing compared to intensive tillage treatments. In addition, tillage practices can significantly influence the thermal conductivity of the soil by changing soil properties such as the bulk density and aggregation (Van Wie et al. 2013). Similarly, Salem et al. (2015) reported that the soil temperature was lower under direct sowing conditions.

It has been determined that the negative linear relationships of CO2 emission with soil temperature values at two soil depths (5 and 20 cm) were significant (p<0.05) in the conventional tillage practice (Figure 2). Similarly, Buragiene et al. (2019) reported a negative correlation between soil temperature and CO₂ emissions from soil. However, in direct sowing practice, the correlations were not significant (Figure 3). In conditions where the effect of soil temperature on CO2 emissions is evaluated independently of moisture, increases in CO2 emissions can be observed with the positive effect on soil biological activity of the increase in soil temperature. Therefore, many previous studies reported that soil temperature is positively correlated with CO2 emissions (Sainju et al. 2008; Rey et al. 2011; Nosalewicz et al. 2013; Chen et al. 2018; Du et al. 2019; Zhao et al. 2020). In this study, although soil temperatures increased with water deficit (Table 1), soil moisture contents also were reduced significantly. Therefore, it was concluded that soil moisture had a dominant effect on CO2 emissions compared to the soil temperature. It is indicated that a general result, the moisture balance of the soil and the processes of keeping it moist greatly affect the oxidation of organic carbon in the soil (Morugan-Coronado et al. 2011; Shi & Marschner 2014). Considering mentioned approaches above, it also could be said that lowering soil temperatures in the direct sowing practice, compared to the conventional tillage, made the effect of temperature insignificant on CO2 release with better soil moisture conditions.

The harvesting time findings in silage maize cultivated conditions revealed that full irrigation with wastewater increased CO2 emissions, and while the CO2 emissions, H2O emissions, and soil moisture contents in deficit irrigation conditions with wastewater were lower, soil temperatures were higher. In addition, direct sowing practice significantly contributed to the reduction of CO2 emissions when compared to conventional tillage by providing carbon savings. It was found that direct sowing practice resulted in lower soil temperatures than the conventional tillage. While the significant positive linear relationships were determined between CO2 emissions with H2O emissions and the soil moisture contents measured in different soil depths (5, 10, and 20 cm), soil temperatures negatively correlated to the CO2 emissions.

Climate change threatens populations and countries through damage to ecosystems, increases in hazardous weather events, declines in productivity, and causes greater costs to maintain current infrastructure. As a conclusion of this study, since full irrigation with wastewater and conventional tillage significantly increase CO2 emissions from soil, it was clearly seen that deficit irrigations with wastewater in direct sowing practice reduce CO2 emissions from soil at a considerable level. However, there is a need to increase the practicality of short-term findings with the results of long-term wastewater applications that will provide more organic carbon recovery in different geographic locations.

This study was financially supported by the Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TUBITAK Project No: 119O528).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Abdalla
K.
,
Chivenge
P.
,
Ciais
P.
&
Chaplot
V.
2016
No-tillage lessens soil CO2 emissions the most under arid and sandy soil conditions: results from a meta-analysis
.
Biogeosciences Discussions
12
,
15495
15535
.
Akbolat
D.
&
Senyigit
U.
2012
Short-term effect of different irrigation water levels on soil carbon dioxide emission
.
Fresenius Environmental Bulletin
21
(
12
),
3869
3873
.
Akbolat
D.
,
Barut
Z.
,
Turgut
M. M.
&
Celik
I.
2016
Soil CO2 emissions under conventional and conservational tillage methods in soybean cultivation in Cukurova Plain of Turkey
.
Agronomy Series
59
,
15
20
.
Aksay
C. S.
,
Ketenoglu
O.
&
Kurt
L.
2005
Global warming and climatic change
.
Selcuk University Journal of Science Faculty
1
(
25
),
29
42
.
Altikat
S.
,
Celik
A.
&
Bilen
S.
2012
Effects of various tillage systems on soil CO2-C fluxes and bacteria and fungi populations in Zea mays
.
African Journal of Agricultural Research
7
(
19
),
2926
2934
.
Buragiene
S.
,
Sarauskis
E.
,
Romaneckas
K.
,
Adamaviciene
A.
,
Kriauciuniene
Z.
,
Avizienyte
D.
,
Marozas
V.
&
Naujokiene
V.
2019
Relationship between CO2 emissions and soil properties of differently tilled soils
.
Science of the Total Environment
662
,
786
795
.
Chen
H.
,
Hou
H.
,
Wang
X.
,
Zhu
Y.
,
Saddique
Q.
,
Wang
Y.
&
Cai
H.
2018
The effects of aeration and irrigation regimes on soil CO2 and N2O emissions in a greenhouse tomato production system
.
Journal of Integrative Agriculture
17
(
2
),
449
460
.
Du
Y.
,
Gu
X.
,
Wang
J.
&
Niu
W.
2019
Yield and gas exchange of greenhouse tomato at different nitrogen levels under aerated irrigation
.
Science Total Environmental
668
,
1156
1164
.
Entry
J. A.
,
Mills
D.
,
Mathee
K.
,
Jayachandran
K.
,
Sojka
R. E.
&
Narasimhan
G.
2008
Influence of irrigated agriculture on soil microbial diversity
.
Applied Soil Ecology Journal
40
,
146
154
.
FAO
2020
The State of Food and Agriculture
. .
Forster
P.
,
Ramaswamy
V.
,
Artaxo
P.
,
Berntsen
T.
,
Betts
R.
,
Fahey
D. W.
,
Haywood
J.
,
Lean
J.
,
Lowe
D. C.
,
Myhre
G.
,
Nganga
J.
,
Prinn
R.
,
Raga
G.
,
Schulz
M.
,
Dorland
R. V.
2007
Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change
. In:
Changes in Atmospheric Constituents and in Radiative Forcing, Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis
(
Solomon
S.
,
Qin
D.
,
Manning
M.
,
Chen
Z.
,
Marquis
M.
,
Tignor
K. B.
&
Miller
H. L.
, eds).
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
, pp.
129
234
.
Hou
H.
,
Han
Z.
,
Yang
Y.
,
Abudu
S.
,
Cai
H.
&
Li
Z.
2020
Soil CO2 emissions from summer maize fields under deficit irrigation
.
Environmental Science and Pollution Research
27
,
4442
4449
.
Jabro
J. D.
,
Sainju
U.
,
Stevens
W. B.
&
Evans
R. G.
2008
Carbon dioxide flux as affected by tillage and irrigation in soil converted from perennial forages to annual crops
.
Journal of Environmental Management
88
(
4
),
1478
1484
.
Kocyigit
R.
2008
Carbon management and importance in terrestrial ecosystem
.
Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University
25
(
1
),
81
85
.
Kudal
M.
&
Muftuoglu
N. M.
2014
The investigation of some productivity properties in irrigated lands with waste water
.
COMU Journal of Agriculture Faculty
2
(
1
),
77
81
.
Lamparter
A.
,
Bachmann
J.
,
Goebel
M. O.
&
Woche
S. K.
2009
Carbon mineralization soil: impact of wetting-drying, aggregation and water repellency
.
Geoderma
150
,
324
333
.
Li
X.
,
Liu
F.
,
Li
G.
,
Lin
Q.
&
Jensen
C. R.
2010
Soil microbial response, water and nitrogen use by tomato under different irrigation regimes
.
Agriculture Water Management
98
,
414
418
.
Mancinelli
R.
,
Marinari
S.
,
Brunetti
P.
,
Radicetti
E.
&
Campiglia
E.
2015
Organic mulching, irrigation and fertilization affect soil CO2 emission and C storage in tomato crop in the Mediterranean environment
.
Soil and Tillage Research
152
,
39
51
.
Morugan-Coronado
A.
,
García-Orenes
F.
,
Mataix-Solera
J.
,
Arcenegui
V.
&
Mataix-Beneyto
J.
2011
Short-term effects of treated wastewater irrigation on Mediterranean calcareous soil
.
Soil and Tillage Research
112
(
1
),
18
26
.
Nelson
D. W.
&
Sommers
L. E.
1982
Methods of soil analysis: part 2 – physical and mineralogical methods
. In:
Total Carbon, Organic Carbon and Organic Matter
(
Klute
A.
, ed.). American Society of Agronomy and Soil Science Society, Madison, WI, pp.
961
1010
.
Nosalewicz
M.
,
Stepniewska
Z.
&
Nosalewicz
A.
2013
Effect of soil moisture and temperature on N2O and CO2 concentrations in soil irrigated with purified wastewater
.
International Agrophysics
27
(
3
),
299
304
.
Raich
J. W.
&
Potter
C. S.
1995
Global patterns of carbon dioxide emissions from soils
.
Global Biogeochemical Cycles
9
(
1
),
23
36
.
Rey
A.
,
Pegoraro
E.
,
Oyonarte
C.
,
Were
A.
,
Escribano
P.
&
Raimundo
J.
2011
Impact of land degradation on soil respiration in a steppe (Stipa tenacissima L.) semi-arid ecosystem in the SE of Spain
.
Soil Biology and Biochemistry
43
,
393
403
.
Salem
H. M.
,
Valero
C.
,
Muñoz
M. Á.
,
Rodríguez
M. G.
&
Silva
L. L.
2015
Short-term effects of four tillage practices on soil physical properties, soil water potential, and maize yield
.
Geoderma
237
,
60
70
.
Senyigit
U.
&
Akbolat
D.
2010
The effect of different irrigation methods on soil carbon dioxide emission
.
Ecology
19
(
77
),
59
64
.
Setyanto
P.
,
Rosenani
A. B.
,
Boer
B.
,
Fauziah
C. I.
&
Khanif
M. J.
2004
The effect of rice cultivars on methane emission from irrigated rice field
.
Indonesian Journal of Agriculture Science
5
(
1
),
20
31
.
Shakeel
A.
,
Anjum
L.
,
Ibni Zamir
S.
,
Rizwan
M.
,
Arshad
M.
,
Mehmood
Q.
,
Sajjad
M.
&
Waqas
A.
2021
Irrigation water quality effects on CO2 emissions along with crop and soil responses
.
Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science
58
(
2
),
637
642
.
Shen
Y.
,
McLaughlin
N.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Xu
M.
&
Liang
A.
2018
Effect of tillage and crop residue on soil temperature following planting for a Black soil in Northeast China
.
Scientific Reports
8
(
1
),
1
9
.
Tubiello
F. N.
,
Salvatore
M.
,
Ferrara
A. F.
,
House
J.
,
Federici
S.
,
Rossi
S.
,
Biancalani
R.
,
Golec
R. D. C.
,
Jacobs
H.
,
Flammini
A.
,
Prosperi
P.
,
Cardenas-Galindo
P.
,
Schmidhuber
J.
,
Sanchez
M. J. S.
,
Srivastava
N.
&
Smith
P.
2015
The contribution of agriculture, forestry and other land use activities to global warming
.
Global Change Biology
21
(
7
),
2655
2660
.
Van Wie
J. B.
,
Adam
J. C.
&
Ullman
J. L.
2013
Conservation tillage in dryland agriculture impacts watershed hydrology
.
Journal of Hydrology
483
,
26
38
.
Vurarak
Y.
&
Bilgili
M. E.
2015
Agricultural mechanization, erosion and carbon emission: a review
.
Anadolu Journal of Agricultural Sciences
30
(
3
),
307
316
.
WMO
2019
World Meteorological Organization, Greenhouse Gas Bulletin
.
Available from: https://library.wmo.int/doc_num.php?explnum_id=5455 (accessed 17 January 2022)
.
Yerli
C.
,
Sahin
U.
,
Cakmakci
T.
&
Tufenkci
S.
2019
Effects of agricultural applications on CO2 emission and ways to reduce
.
Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology
7
(
9
),
1446
1456
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).