Using meteorological analysis, composite analysis and water vapor trajectory analysis, the extreme value rainstorm process in northwest Hunan was analyzed. The results show that three types are summarized: the Southwest Vortex and Warm Shear Line Pattern (SVWSLP), the Subtropical High Edge Pattern (SHEP) and the Cold Trough and Shear Line Pattern (CTSLP). The main influence systems are upper trough, southwest vortex, shear line, low-level jet and subtropical high edge. For SVWSLP, the water vapor transport channels are only from the low-latitude ocean whether it is affected by long-distance typhoons. For SHEP, the main water vapor channel comes from the long-distance ocean and is finally transported to northwestern Hunan around 650 hPa in the form of warm and wet airflow, whether it is affected by long-distance typhoons. The CTSLP appears a significant water vapor confrontation between the north and the south and the baroclinicity of the atmosphere in the rainstorm area. The southern and western boundaries are the input boundary, while the eastern and northern boundaries are the outflow boundary. Therefore, one of the three types of weather systems appears in northwestern Hunan in May–August, with strong water vapor transport from the ocean surface, which is likely to cause extreme rainstorm.

  • Climatic characteristics of extreme precipitation in northwest Hunan.

  • The terrain of northwest Hunan is complex, and the system extreme value is analyzed for the first time.

  • The influence of water vapor in northwest Hunan is analyzed by HYSPLT for the first time.

  • No one has ever studied the influence of long-distance typhoons in northwestern Hunan.

  • The results are of great significance to the prediction of extreme value rainstorms in northwest Hunan.

Extreme rainstorm refers to the precipitation that rarely occurs in the history of a certain area. Because of its extreme nature, once it occurs, it often causes floods, mudslides, landslides, urban and rural waterlogging and other disasters, causing serious loss of life and property. In recent years, extreme precipitation has occurred and brought serious disasters around the world (Grams et al. 2014; Lynch & Schumacher 2014). In particular, under the background of global warming, global extreme rainstorm events are generally increasing (Goswami et al. 2006; Gochis et al. 2015; Takahashi et al. 2015). Some cmip5 models also show a significant increase in extreme rainstorms (Pendergrass & Hartmann 2014). In China, an extreme rainstorm is one of the most important disastrous weather events. The frequency of extreme rainstorms in most regions of China increased significantly (Zhai et al. 2005), especially in Central China, where it shows a significant upward trend due to the influence of East Asian summer monsoon and special terrain (Gao & Xie 2014). For example, the ‘7.20’ extreme rainstorm in Zhengzhou in 2021 shocked China and abroad, and many stations broke through the historical extreme value, resulting in heavy casualties and property losses (Ran et al. 2021).

Research shows that extreme rainstorm is the result of the multi-scale weather system, and occurs against the background of the typical weather situation and physical quantity factor anomaly (Kharin & Zwiers 2005; Zhou et al. 2022). The trigger mechanism and formation mechanism of an extreme rainstorm emphasized the effects of dynamic, water vapor and terrain (Zeng et al. 2020; Zhao et al. 2022). Li et al. (2019) pointed out that the influence of topography on extreme precipitation is more significant. Chen (2021) used the statistical analysis of extreme precipitation in Hunan from 1981 to 2018, according to the weather system classification: southwest vortex warm shear line type, cold trough shear line type, typhoon type, subtropical high edge type and consistent south wind type.

Continuous water vapor transport during the formation of a rainstorm is very necessary, therefore, it is more important to explore the water vapor sources and their transport channels that cause rainstorms. At present, there are many studies on water vapor transport and sources in China, but most studies use Euler's method. The water vapor flux calculated from the instantaneous atmospheric wind field also has instantaneous characteristics. The water vapor flux calculated from the instantaneous atmospheric wind field also has instantaneous characteristics, therefore, the final water vapor transport channel can only be simple, and it is impossible to quantitatively determine the contribution rate of each water vapor source to precipitation (Jiang et al. 2013). Water vapor analysis from the Lagrangian point of view performs backward tracking through the three-dimensional position of air parcels in the atmosphere, determining the three-dimensional position of the air parcel and the physical quantities such as temperature, pressure and humidity at each time can determine the trajectory and the source water vapor contribution during the water vapor transport process (Gimeno et al. 2010; Salih et al. 2015). Therefore, the analysis of water vapor from Lagrange's point of view is an indispensable and important aspect in the study of the causes of rainstorms in northwest Hunan.

The northern part of northwestern Hunan is located in the Wuling Mountains, which is northeast and southwest. The altitude is mostly above 1,000 m. The Huping Mountain (northern Shimen County) at the junction of Hunan and Hubei is as high as 2.099 m, which is the highest mountain in Hunan. At the same time, the south side of northwest Hunan is located on the northwest side of Xuefeng Mountain and the eastern edge of Yun-Gui Plateau. The complex terrain and the frequent occurrence of extreme rainstorms can easily cause geological disasters such as waterlogging, floods and debris flows, which pose a serious threat to people's lives and property safety and social and economic development. Therefore, it is of great significance to analyze the characteristics and mechanism of extreme rainstorms in northwest Hunan.

Extreme rainstorm is a small probability event, the estimation of precipitation extremes and the forecast of heavy precipitation duration are often insufficient in daily duty operations. In addition, the numerical prediction model has limited ability to predict and simulate heavy rainfall, and its mechanism is not yet fully understood. Therefore, the problem of extreme rainstorm forecasting is still a very challenging problem for operational forecasting and service work. This paper uses the existing historical site observation data and global reanalysis data, the maximum value of extreme rainstorm events in each station in northwestern Hunan was selected as the extreme value day, and the circulation situation when the rainstorm event occurred in the northwest of Hunan was analyzed. The extreme rainstorm area of each station is combined with the weather situation and elements. By analyzing the situation field of each station, the classification of extreme rainstorms in northwest Hunan is carried out and the conceptual model is summarized. Based on the analysis of physical quantities such as water vapor, combined with the backward trajectory model, the key technical indicators of extreme rainstorm forecasts in northwest Hunan are summarized. We hope to deepen the understanding of rainstorm water vapor transport in northwestern Hunan and play a role in operational applications.

Data

The extreme value rainstorm data include the daily precipitation data of 16 national meteorological observation stations in northwest Hunan from 1961 to 2020 (Beijing time, 20:00–20:00), and ERA-5 daily reanalysis data (1° × 1°), which are taken from European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF). The meteorological field data Global Data Assimilation System (GDAS) data from the National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) with a resolution of 1° × 1° are used in the Hybrid Single Particle Lagrangian Integrated Trajectory model (HYSPLIT 4.9).

Methods

Definition of daily extreme value rainstorm

The daily extreme value rainstorm studied in this paper is the maximum daily precipitation value since the establishment of 16 stations in northwestern Hunan, and its definition adopts the top value method (Sun & Zhang 2017): That is to say, the values of all daily precipitation greater than or equal to 0.1 mm in 16 national stations in northwest Hunan are sorted from small to large, and then the maximum (top1) precipitation is selected from the maximum end as the daily extreme value precipitation process of the station in the past 60 years, and further analysis is carried out. Daily extreme value rainstorm process and terrain distribution in northwestern Hunan are shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Spatial distribution of daily extreme value rainstorms at national stations (red dot) in northwest Hunan. Precipitation (unit: mm); terrain height.

Figure 1

Spatial distribution of daily extreme value rainstorms at national stations (red dot) in northwest Hunan. Precipitation (unit: mm); terrain height.

Close modal

Brief introduction of HYSPLIT v4.9

The HYSPLIT v4.9 was developed through a collaborative effort between NOAA's ARL (Air Resources Laboratory) and the Australian Bureau of Meteorology. This model adopts the Lagrangian method for advection and dispersion calculations, which can better characterize the three-dimensional variations of airflows during transport processes. The model uses the terrain following coordinate (σ). Assuming that the movement of the air parcel is affected by the wind, the trajectory position is the integration of time and space vectors. The three-dimensional velocity vector is obtained by linear interpolation in spatial and time. The specific calculation formula is as follows:
(1)
(2)

In the formula: P(t) is the initial position of the air parcel; P′(t + Δt) is the initial hypothetical initial position of the air parcel; P(t + Δt) is the final position of the air parcel; V(P, t) is the three-dimensional velocity vector at the initial position; V(P′, t + Δt) is the three-dimensional velocity vector of the initial hypothetical position and Δt is the time step (Draxler & Hess 1998).

Cluster analysis of trajectories

When the number of calculated trajectories is huge, the pathway cannot be displayed intuitively. In addition, in order to eliminate the influence of individual abnormal trajectories, cluster analysis is used to cluster the trajectories. The method of trajectory merging and classification is based on the principle of the nearest trajectory path. Assuming that there are N trajectories, the spatial variance of each cluster is defined as the quadratic sum of the distance between each trajectory in the cluster with the corresponding point of the average trajectory of the cluster. Each trajectory is defined as an independent cluster with zero spatial variance at the starting time. The spatial variance of all possible combinations of two clusters is calculated, and any two clusters are merged into a new cluster so that the total spatial variance (TSV) of all clusters after merging is smaller than that before merging, until all trajectories are merged into a cluster. The clusters separated before the TSV increases rapidly are the final clusters, and the average trajectories of these clusters can be calculated.

Trajectory simulation scheme

The simulation area in this study is northwestern Hunan (27.5°N–30°N, 109°E–111.5°E). The initial altitudes of the simulations are six levels at 100, 500, 1,500, 2,000, 3,000 and 5,000 m. These levels roughly correspond to the near-surface layer and levels at 925, 850, 700, 800 and 500 hPa, respectively. The three-dimensional trajectories of backward tracking for 10 days are simulated four times a day (00:00, 06:00, 12:00 and 18:00), and output the hourly trajectory position (latitude, longitude and altitude) and meteorological conditions (temperature, specific humidity and geopotential height). Although the initial altitudes of the simulation are fixed, each trajectory is simulated in Lagrangian space, its altitude evolves with the circulation, so it varies with location and time.

The specific humidity and water vapor contribution rate

In order to analyze the contribution rates of water vapor in different channels, the specific humidity and water vapor contribution rates of water vapor channels are expressed as follows (Shi et al. 2020; Tian et al. 2022):
(3)
where Qs denotes the specific humidity and water vapor contribution rate of water vapor channels; qlast is the specific humidity or water vapor flux at the terminal position of the channel; m is the number of the trajectories contained in the channel and n is the total number of trajectories.

Calculation method of water vapor budget

The moisture budget equation is as follows (Chen et al. 2019):
(4)

In the formula: q represents the specific humidity; V represents the horizontal wind; ω represents the vertical velocity. ∂q/∂t represents the local variation of water vapor; ∇·qV represents the divergence of water vapor flux; ∂ωq/∂p represents the vertical transportation of water vapor; m represents the condensation rate and E represents the evaporation rate. The average water vapor budget in the region can be diagnosed by integrating the above equation from the atmospheric bottom Ps to the atmospheric top Pt and averaging the selected calculation region.

Climatic characteristics of daily extreme precipitation thresholds

From Figure 2(a), it can be seen that the average daily extreme precipitation threshold in northwest Hunan has a large interannual variation and the confidence is greater than 95%, showing an upward trend. The minimum value of the threshold was 52.4 mm in 1961, the maximum value of the threshold was 114.8 mm in 1998, and the average value of the threshold was 76.1 mm. There is an obvious mutation in 1995. Before 1995, the threshold was mostly less than 80 mm (average value is 70.5 mm), while after 1995, the threshold was mostly greater than 80 mm (average value is 83.4 mm). From the spatial distribution of the daily extreme precipitation threshold (Figure 2(b)), the threshold shows a slightly increasing distribution from west to east, most threshold values are above 70 mm, and the minimum value is Yongshun (66.2 mm).
Figure 2

Interannual variation of daily extreme precipitation thresholds (a) and spatial distribution of daily extreme precipitation thresholds (unit: mm) (b) in northwestern Hunan during 1961–2020 (color filling, unit: mm).

Figure 2

Interannual variation of daily extreme precipitation thresholds (a) and spatial distribution of daily extreme precipitation thresholds (unit: mm) (b) in northwestern Hunan during 1961–2020 (color filling, unit: mm).

Close modal

Climatic characteristics of daily extreme rainstorm thresholds

From Table 1, among the 16 counties and cities in northwestern Hunan, there were 1,301 daily extreme precipitation events in the past 60 years, with an average of 22 times per year and 81 times per station. All stations had more than 50 daily extreme precipitation processes, with the least Luxi (53 times) and the most Chenxi (115 times). The spatial distribution of the average intensity of extreme rainstorms is similar to the spatial distribution of daily extreme precipitation threshold (Figure 2(b)), with the maximum value at Luxi (123.9 mm) and the minimum value at Fenghuang (90.4 mm). The average wind speed of 10 m shows a slightly increasing distribution from south to north, and the daily mean temperature of 2 m shows a relatively average distribution. Except for Huayuan and Baojing stations, the maximum daily extreme precipitation is less than 200 mm, and other stations are more than 200 mm. The maximum value is 455.5 mm in Zhangjiajie (20:00 on July 8–20:00 on 9 July 2003), and the main maximum daily extreme values are concentrated in 200–300 mm, accounting for 69%.

Table 1

Historical daily extreme value rainstorm of each station

StationsAverage intensity of extreme rainstorm (mm)Frequency of extreme rainstormMinimum daily extreme precipitation (mm)Maximum daily extreme precipitation (mm)Median of daily extreme precipitation (mm)Quartiles of daily extreme precipitation (mm)Daily mean temperature of 2 m (°C)Average wind speed of 10 m (m/s)
Longshan 93.8 88 70.5 276.7 84.3 163.2 22.31 1.3 
Sangzhi 113.1 84 79.8 373.8 101.1 188.2 22.48 1.3 
Zhangjiajie 105.6 79 77.7 455.5 95.9 168.9 22.29 1.7 
Shimen 114.7 69 85.6 217.7 106.8 162.9 25.10 2.6 
Cili 117.1 72 88.5 249.3 105.2 200.1 23.15 1.5 
Huayuan 103.2 56 68.5 191.3 86.5 142.9 23.62 2.1 
Baojing 101.3 65 66.5 189.2 83.7 167.8 22.16 2.2 
Yongshun 104.5 94 76.7 344.1 95.9 210.8 23.19 1.8 
Guzhang 104.9 75 73.6 227.4 92.8 167.1 23.82 2.8 
Jishou 102.7 98 77.1 231.1 96.3 172.4 23.30 2.4 
Yuanling 110.2 89 82 259.5 96.8 190.3 22.70 2.8 
Luxi 123.9 53 80.8 263.9 98.5 187.4 24.14 2.5 
Chenxi 102.3 115 77.1 270 98.8 200.8 23.61 2.1 
Fenghuang 90.4 96 69.7 251.5 83.8 164.7 22.84 2.3 
Mayang 103.1 65 72 238.6 89.9 166.5 23.11 2.4 
Xupu 100.9 103 78.6 252 94.1 185.2 22.98 2.0 
StationsAverage intensity of extreme rainstorm (mm)Frequency of extreme rainstormMinimum daily extreme precipitation (mm)Maximum daily extreme precipitation (mm)Median of daily extreme precipitation (mm)Quartiles of daily extreme precipitation (mm)Daily mean temperature of 2 m (°C)Average wind speed of 10 m (m/s)
Longshan 93.8 88 70.5 276.7 84.3 163.2 22.31 1.3 
Sangzhi 113.1 84 79.8 373.8 101.1 188.2 22.48 1.3 
Zhangjiajie 105.6 79 77.7 455.5 95.9 168.9 22.29 1.7 
Shimen 114.7 69 85.6 217.7 106.8 162.9 25.10 2.6 
Cili 117.1 72 88.5 249.3 105.2 200.1 23.15 1.5 
Huayuan 103.2 56 68.5 191.3 86.5 142.9 23.62 2.1 
Baojing 101.3 65 66.5 189.2 83.7 167.8 22.16 2.2 
Yongshun 104.5 94 76.7 344.1 95.9 210.8 23.19 1.8 
Guzhang 104.9 75 73.6 227.4 92.8 167.1 23.82 2.8 
Jishou 102.7 98 77.1 231.1 96.3 172.4 23.30 2.4 
Yuanling 110.2 89 82 259.5 96.8 190.3 22.70 2.8 
Luxi 123.9 53 80.8 263.9 98.5 187.4 24.14 2.5 
Chenxi 102.3 115 77.1 270 98.8 200.8 23.61 2.1 
Fenghuang 90.4 96 69.7 251.5 83.8 164.7 22.84 2.3 
Mayang 103.1 65 72 238.6 89.9 166.5 23.11 2.4 
Xupu 100.9 103 78.6 252 94.1 185.2 22.98 2.0 

From Figure 3(a), it can be seen that the interannual variation of the frequency of daily extreme precipitation is similar to the interannual variation trend of the threshold, showing an upward trend (confidence is greater than 95%), with the minimum 4 times in 1992 and 2001 and the maximum 48 times in 2014. There was also an obvious mutation in 1995. Before 1995, the frequency of extreme precipitation was less (18 times per year on average), while after 1995, the frequency of extreme precipitation increased (28 times per year on average). Although the interannual variation of the average intensity of daily extreme precipitation is also large, there are no mutation characteristics similar to frequency and threshold (Figure 3(b)). Combined with Figures 2 and 3, it is shown that since the 1990s, with the influence of various factors such as global warming, extreme flood disasters are prone to occur, which are characterized by large precipitation intensity (large daily extreme precipitation threshold), high frequency (many daily stations of extreme precipitation), severe drought and severe flood (large interannual variation of daily extreme precipitation threshold and extreme precipitation frequency). Combined with Figures 2 and 3 illustrate that extreme flood disasters have been prone to occur since the 1990s with the influence of global warming and other factors, with the characteristics of high precipitation intensity (large daily extreme precipitation threshold), high frequency (stations of daily extreme precipitation are large), and drought and flood interphased (large interannual variation of daily extreme precipitation threshold and frequency of daily extreme precipitation).
Figure 3

Interannual variations of frequency (a) and intensity (b) on daily extreme precipitation in northwestern Hunan during 1961–2020.

Figure 3

Interannual variations of frequency (a) and intensity (b) on daily extreme precipitation in northwestern Hunan during 1961–2020.

Close modal

From the monthly variation of frequency of daily extreme precipitation (Table 2), the daily extreme precipitation process appears from March to November, but the frequency of each month is quite different, with obvious monthly variation characteristics. The frequency is highest in May to August, with the most in July, followed by June, accounting for 30.36 and 30.28%, respectively. November is the least, accounting for 0.15%. The average intensity of daily extreme precipitation also has obvious monthly variation characteristics, with the maximum in July, followed by June, and the minimum in November. Therefore, May to August is the key season for flood control in northwest Hunan. This is related to the strong warm and humid airflow in summer and more severe convective weather (Chen et al. 2019).

Table 2

Monthly variation of frequency of extreme precipitation and average intensity of extreme rainstorm in northwest Hunan during 1961–2020

Month34567891011
Frequency of extreme precipitation (number) 52 169 394 395 181 85 17 
Average intensity of extreme rainstorm (mm) 82.7 90.0 98.7 106.9 109.9 103.7 101.4 91.8 75.8 
Month34567891011
Frequency of extreme precipitation (number) 52 169 394 395 181 85 17 
Average intensity of extreme rainstorm (mm) 82.7 90.0 98.7 106.9 109.9 103.7 101.4 91.8 75.8 

Using the synoptic diagnostic analysis method, the 16 selected daily extreme rainstorm processes in northwest Hunan during the recent 70 years are classified into the Southwest Vortex and Warm Shear Line Pattern (SVWSLP), the Subtropical High Edge Pattern (SHEP) and the Cold Trough and Shear Line Pattern (CTSLP). Different from Chen et al.'s (2019) classification of extreme rainstorms in Hunan, there are only three types of extreme rainstorms in northwest Hunan. There is no Consistent Southerly Pattern and Typhoon Pattern in northwest Hunan, and these two types mainly occur in southern and eastern Hunan.

From Table 3, among the three types of extreme rainstorms in northwestern Hunan, SVWSLP has the highest frequency of occurrence, accounting for 56.25% of the total number, reaching half of the total process. It is the main type of daily extreme rainstorm in northwest Hunan, which is related to the geographical location of northwest Hunan. The second is the SHEP, accounting for 25% of the total number; and finally, is CTSLP. In terms of the average daily precipitation extremes, the three types of intensity are relatively close to each other, and the strongest is CTSLP.

Table 3

Main characteristics of three weather types of daily extreme value rainstorm processes in northwest Hunan

ElementsSVWSLPSHEPCTSLP
Number of cases (number) 
Proportion (%) 56.25 25 18.75 
Average daily precipitation extreme value (mm) 257.9 270.95 298 
ElementsSVWSLPSHEPCTSLP
Number of cases (number) 
Proportion (%) 56.25 25 18.75 
Average daily precipitation extreme value (mm) 257.9 270.95 298 

In order to further discuss in detail the main weather system configuration, dynamic and thermal characteristics of each type of extreme value rainstorm process from high to low levels in northwest Hunan are studied. ERA-5 reanalysis data is used for composite analysis of the weather pattern of various types of extreme rainstorm processes at each layer in northwest Hunan.

The Southwest Vortex and Warm Shear Line Pattern

The typical characteristics of SVWSLP extreme value rainstorm are one ridge and one trough at 500 hPa. The northeast-southwest low trough is located in the southeast of the North China-Sichuan Basin. Northwest Hunan is in the southwest warm and humid airflow from the south side of the low trough. The Western Pacific Subtropical High (WPSH) is located over the western Pacific, and the ridge line is about 22°N latitude. Southwest vortex and herringbone shear in the eastern part of the 850 hPa plateau. The northwest of Hunan is affected by the superposition of warm shear and ground inverted trough convergence line, the dynamic uplift effect is enhanced. At the same time, 200 hPa is under the divergent airflow, and the suction effect is strong, which is beneficial to the occurrence of extreme rainstorms in northwest Hunan (Figure 4).
Figure 4

The main weather influence system configuration of the Southwest Vortex and Warm Shear Line Pattern extreme value rainstorm process (a) 200 hPa height field (contour, unit: dagpm) and wind field (wind pole, color filling for high-altitude jet, unit: m/s), (b) 500 hPa height field (contour, unit: dagpm), (c) 850 hPa wind field (wind pole, unit: m/s) and relative humidity (color filling) (red arrow: low-level jet, red double solid line: shear line), (d) sea level pressure (black contour, unit: hPa), ground wind field (wind pole, unit: m/s) and dew point temperature field (green contour, unit: °C) (blue dotted line: ground convergence line).

Figure 4

The main weather influence system configuration of the Southwest Vortex and Warm Shear Line Pattern extreme value rainstorm process (a) 200 hPa height field (contour, unit: dagpm) and wind field (wind pole, color filling for high-altitude jet, unit: m/s), (b) 500 hPa height field (contour, unit: dagpm), (c) 850 hPa wind field (wind pole, unit: m/s) and relative humidity (color filling) (red arrow: low-level jet, red double solid line: shear line), (d) sea level pressure (black contour, unit: hPa), ground wind field (wind pole, unit: m/s) and dew point temperature field (green contour, unit: °C) (blue dotted line: ground convergence line).

Close modal

When the forecaster is on duty, such as the southwest vortex in the eastern part of the plateau with the southwest vortex eastward impact on Hunan, and with the herringbone shear line, low-level jet and other systems together, the system is stable and less dynamic. With the special terrain of northwest Hunan, forecasters need to consider the possibility of extreme rainstorms in northwest Hunan.

The Subtropical High Edge Pattern

The SHEP extreme value rainstorm is characterized by two troughs and one ridge in the middle and high latitudes at 500 hPa, and the blocking high near Lake Baikal is obvious. The northeast-southwest low trough is located in the northeast of the North China-Sichuan Basin. The WPSH is located in the south of Jiangnan region and South China in a band, and the ridge line of the WPSH is around 24°N latitude. The south side of the WPSH is sometimes supported by long-distance typhoons, resulting in the stable maintenance of the WPSH. Northwest Hunan is under the environmental background of high energy and high humidity at the edge of the WPSH, and 850 hPa is located between the outlet of the southwest jet and the shear line, with weak cold air infiltration and ground convergence line affecting northwestern Hunan. At the same time, 200 hPa is at the bottom of the diversion area, and the dynamic effect is obvious. Under the combined influence of multiple systems, it leads to the occurrence of extreme rainstorms in northwest Hunan (Figure 5).
Figure 5

Same as Figure 4, but is the Subtropical High Edge Pattern.

Figure 5

Same as Figure 4, but is the Subtropical High Edge Pattern.

Close modal

The heavy precipitation of SHEP mostly appears in the midsummer season. The extreme value rainstorm in northwest Hunan needs the forecaster to pay attention to the support effect of the long-distance typhoons, the low-level shear, the ground convergence line and the unstable energy and water vapor conditions in northwest Hunan.

The Cold Trough and Shear Line Pattern

For the CTSLP extreme value rainstorm, the meridional dimension of the 500 hPa trough is large, and the positive vorticity advection in front of the trough is strong. It is located in the Inner Mongolia-Chongqing-Yunnan-Guizhou line, and the large-scale dynamic uplift effect is strong. The superposition of the WPSH and the East China-Yellow Bohai High causes the movement of the low trough system to be blocked, which is favorable for the maintenance of extreme value rainstorms. The combined action of low-level cold shear and surface cold air intrusion into the inverted trough provides the triggering conditions for extreme rainstorms in the unstable stratification of high energy and high humidity in northwest Hunan (Figure 6).
Figure 6

Same as Figure 4, but it is the Cold Trough and Shear Line Pattern.

Figure 6

Same as Figure 4, but it is the Cold Trough and Shear Line Pattern.

Close modal

In the forecast of a CTSLP extreme value rainstorm in northwest Hunan, it is necessary to pay attention to the influence of a deep low trough moving eastward, where the moving speed is slow, and there are low-level cold shear and weak cold air effects.

In summary, the study of weather system classification helps forecasters to quickly identify the situation and configuration of extreme precipitation, and determine the possibility of extreme precipitation. It is essential for the prediction of extreme precipitation.

Sufficient water vapor supply is a necessary condition for rainstorms. The trajectory model HYSPLIT based on Lagrangian models can accurately track the three-dimensional position of the airflow during the transport process. Thus, the situation of water vapor transport at different levels and source water vapor contribution in the process of water vapor transport can be determined. Since the water vapor is mainly concentrated below 500 hPa, the temporal and spatial evolution of water vapor in lower and middle levels are analyzed, using clustered backward trajectories to analyze the characteristics of water vapor transport under various weather conditions. Through the above analysis, it is found that there is no frontal typhoon effect in northwest Hunan to produce extreme rainstorms, but there will be some water vapor transport in the outer cloud system of the long-distance typhoons. The previous research results have not yet involved the effect of long-distance typhoons. Therefore, in the section on water vapor transport analysis, the same type is divided into the influence of long-distance typhoons and without long-distance typhoons.

Water vapor trajectory analysis

A combined analysis of Figure 7 and Table 4 revealed that, for SVWSLP without the influence of long-distance typhoons extreme value rainstorms, there are four main water vapor transport channels in the middle and low levels (Figure 7(a)). The most important channel is from the South China Sea (Channel 1), which accounts for 31.9% of the total number of middle and low-level trajectories, and the contribution rates of specific humidity and water vapor flux are about 44% (Table 4), indicating that nearly one-third of the trajectories come from the South China Sea and carry a large amount of water vapor from the South China Sea to the northwest of Hunan through South China. This is consistent with the research findings of Jiang et al. (2011), Tian et al. (2022) and Hu et al. (2022). The secondary water vapor transport channel is from the Bay of Bengal (Channel 2), which accounts for 28.45% of the total number of middle and low-level trajectories, and the contribution rates of specific humidity and water vapor flux are about 22% (Table 4), indicating that more than a quarter of the water vapor comes from the Bay of Bengal, through the Indian Peninsula–Yun-Gui Plateau into the northwest of Hunan. The third Somali jet channel (Channel 6), which comes from the Arabian Sea with a faster moving speed, accounts for 27.6% and the contribution rates of specific humidity and water vapor flux are about 20% (Table 4). The final is the Indian Ocean–Bay of Bengal channel (Channel 3), which comes from the Indian Ocean with a faster moving speed, accounting for 12.04% and the contribution rate of specific humidity and water vapor is about 12% (Table 4). The height evolution of the water vapor channel (Figure 7(b)) shows that channel 1 and channel 3 both come from the ocean surface in low latitude with initial trajectory height around 1,000 hPa, which are uplifted by the influence of terrain after landing. Channel 2 with an initial trajectory height of around 850 hPa and channel 6 with an initial trajectory height of around 750 hPa are uplifted after crossing the Yun-Gui Plateau, then slightly subside, and are finally transported to northwestern Hunan around 650 hPa in the form of warm and humid air (the pseudo-equivalent potential temperature is higher (Table 4)).
Table 4

The total number of trajectories, specific humidity, water vapor flux contribution rate and pseudo-equivalent potential temperature of each channel under each type

Extreme value rainstorm typesPhysical quantitiesSouth China Sea channel 1Bay of Bengal channel 2Indian Ocean–Bay of Bengal channel 3Western Pacific–South China Sea channel 4High latitude inland channel 5Somali jet channel 6
SVWSLP (without long-distance typhoons) Total trajectories (number) 980 874 370   848 
Contribution of specific humidity (%) 44.67 22.22 12.78   20.33 
Contribution of water vapor flux (%) 44.91 22.10 12.77   20.22 
Pseudo-equivalent potential temperature (K) 304.62 317.47 309.96   319.08 
SVWSLP (with long-distance typhoons) Total trajectories (number) 736 1,500    836 
Contribution of specific humidity (%) 33.79 44.36    21.84 
Contribution of water vapor flux (%) 33.96 44.30    21.74 
Pseudo-equivalent potential temperature (K) 305.75 314.66    318.07 
SHEP (without long-distance typhoons) Total trajectories (number)  816 1,660  596  
Contribution of specific humidity (%)  28.11 50.38  21.51  
Contribution of water vapor flux (%)  28.18 50.25  21.57  
Pseudo-equivalent potential temperature (K)   311.26 313.67   309.51   
SHEP (with long-distance typhoons) Total trajectories (number) 813 493  331  1,435 
Contribution of specific humidity (%) 38.44 13.64  13.17  34.75 
Contribution of water vapor flux (%) 38.67 13.57  13.23  34.53 
Pseudo-equivalent potential temperature (K) 304.78 317.15  308.78  318.68 
CTSLP Total trajectories (number) 732 932   364 1,044 
Contribution of specific humidity (%) 34.33 27.13   16.70 21.85 
Contribution of water vapor flux (%) 34.52 27.01   16.78 21.68 
Pseudo-equivalent potential temperature (K) 304.71 312.72   303.41 320.92 
Extreme value rainstorm typesPhysical quantitiesSouth China Sea channel 1Bay of Bengal channel 2Indian Ocean–Bay of Bengal channel 3Western Pacific–South China Sea channel 4High latitude inland channel 5Somali jet channel 6
SVWSLP (without long-distance typhoons) Total trajectories (number) 980 874 370   848 
Contribution of specific humidity (%) 44.67 22.22 12.78   20.33 
Contribution of water vapor flux (%) 44.91 22.10 12.77   20.22 
Pseudo-equivalent potential temperature (K) 304.62 317.47 309.96   319.08 
SVWSLP (with long-distance typhoons) Total trajectories (number) 736 1,500    836 
Contribution of specific humidity (%) 33.79 44.36    21.84 
Contribution of water vapor flux (%) 33.96 44.30    21.74 
Pseudo-equivalent potential temperature (K) 305.75 314.66    318.07 
SHEP (without long-distance typhoons) Total trajectories (number)  816 1,660  596  
Contribution of specific humidity (%)  28.11 50.38  21.51  
Contribution of water vapor flux (%)  28.18 50.25  21.57  
Pseudo-equivalent potential temperature (K)   311.26 313.67   309.51   
SHEP (with long-distance typhoons) Total trajectories (number) 813 493  331  1,435 
Contribution of specific humidity (%) 38.44 13.64  13.17  34.75 
Contribution of water vapor flux (%) 38.67 13.57  13.23  34.53 
Pseudo-equivalent potential temperature (K) 304.78 317.15  308.78  318.68 
CTSLP Total trajectories (number) 732 932   364 1,044 
Contribution of specific humidity (%) 34.33 27.13   16.70 21.85 
Contribution of water vapor flux (%) 34.52 27.01   16.78 21.68 
Pseudo-equivalent potential temperature (K) 304.71 312.72   303.41 320.92 
Figure 7

The spatial distribution of middle and low-level water vapor channels (a,c) and their height evolution (b,d) ((a,b) SVWSLP without long-distance typhoons, (c,d) SVWSLP with long-distance typhoons).

Figure 7

The spatial distribution of middle and low-level water vapor channels (a,c) and their height evolution (b,d) ((a,b) SVWSLP without long-distance typhoons, (c,d) SVWSLP with long-distance typhoons).

Close modal

For SVWSLP with the influence of long-distance typhoons extreme value rainstorms (Figure 7(c)), there are three main water vapor transport channels in the middle and low levels. The most important channel is from the Bay of Bengal (Channel 2), which accounts for 48.83% and the contribution rates of specific humidity and water vapor flux are about 44% (Table 4), and water vapor enters northwest Hunan through the Indian Peninsula. This is followed by the Somali jet channel (Channel 6) with a faster moving speed, which accounts for 27.21%, and the contribution rate of specific humidity and water vapor flux about 22%. Finally, the South China Sea channel (Channel 1) with a slow-moving speed accounts for 23.96% and the contribution rate of specific humidity and water vapor is about 34% (Table 4). The height evolution of the water vapor channel (Figure 7(d)) shows that the initial trajectory height of all channels is low, and is uplifted to varying degrees by the influence of terrain after landing.

For SHEP without the influence of long-distance typhoons extreme value rainstorms, there are three main water vapor transport channels in the middle and low levels (Figure 8(a)). The most important channel is the Indian Ocean–Bay of Bengal channel (Channel 3) with a faster moving speed, accounting for 54.04% of the total number of middle and low-level trajectories, and the contribution rates of specific humidity and water vapor flux are about 50% (Table 4), indicating that nearly half of the trajectories come from the Indian Ocean and carry nearly half the water vapor from the Indian Ocean to the northwest of Hunan through the Indochina Peninsula. This is followed by the Bay of Bengal channel (Channel 2), which accounts for 26.56% and the contribution rate of specific humidity and water vapor flux of about 28%. The final high latitude inland channel (Channel 5) with a slow-moving speed, accounting for 19.40% and the contribution rate of specific humidity and water vapor is about 21% (Table 4). The height evolution of the water vapor channel (Figure 8(b)) shows that channel 2 and channel 3 both come from the ocean surface in low latitude with initial trajectory height around 1,000 hPa, which are uplifted by the influence of terrain after landing. Channel 5 with an initial trajectory height of around 875 hPa is uplifted after crossing the western part of the E-xi mountain area, then slightly subsided, and finally transported to northwestern Hunan around 800 hPa in the form of cold air (the pseudo-equivalent potential temperature is lower (Table 4)).
Figure 8

Same as Figure 7, but is the Subtropical High Edge Pattern.

Figure 8

Same as Figure 7, but is the Subtropical High Edge Pattern.

Close modal

For SHEP with the influence of long-distance typhoons extreme value rainstorms, there are four main water vapor transport channels in the middle and low levels (Figure 8(c)). The main channel is the Somali jet channel (Channel 6) with a faster moving speed, accounting for 46.71% and the contribution rates of specific humidity and water vapor flux are about 35% (Table 4), while water vapor enters northwest Hunan from the Indian Peninsula. This is followed by the South China Sea channel (Channel 1), which accounts for 26.46% and the contribution rate of specific humidity and water vapor flux about 39%. The third is the Bay of Bengal (Channel 2), accounting for 16.05%, and the contribution rate of specific humidity and water vapor flux are about 13%. The final Western Pacific–South China Sea channel (Channel 4), accounting for 10.77%, and the contribution rate of specific humidity and water vapor are about 13% (Table 4). The height evolution of water vapor channel (Figure 8(d)) shows that all channels are uplifted to varying degrees by the influence of terrain after landing.

For CTSLP extreme value rainstorms, there are four main water vapor transport channels in the middle and low levels (Figure 9(a)). The most important channel is the Somali jet channel (Channel 6) with a faster moving speed, accounting for 33.98% of the total number of middle and low-level trajectories, and the contribution rates of specific humidity and water vapor flux are about 22% (Table 4). This is followed by the Bay of Bengal channel (Channel 2), which accounts for 30.34% and the contribution rate of specific humidity and water vapor flux about 27%. The third is the South China Sea channel (Channel 1), accounting for 23.83% of the total number of middle and low-level trajectories, and the contribution rates of specific humidity and water vapor flux are about 34% (Table 4). The final high latitude inland channel (Channel 5) with a faster moving speed, accounting for 11.85%, and the contribution rate of specific humidity and water vapor are about 16% (Table 4). The height evolution of water vapor channel (Figure 9(b)) shows that channels 1, 2, and 6 all come from the ocean surface in low latitude, which is uplifted by the influence of terrain after landing. Channel 5 with an initial trajectory height of around 850 hPa finally sank into northwest Hunan in the form of cold air, and the cold air cushion was formed to lift the warm and humid airflow and strengthen the baroclinicity of the atmosphere in the rainstorm area (the pseudo-equivalent potential temperature is lower (Table 4)).
Figure 9

Same as Figure 7, but is the Cold Trough and Shear Line Pattern.

Figure 9

Same as Figure 7, but is the Cold Trough and Shear Line Pattern.

Close modal

In summary, it can be found that the water vapor transport channels of SVWSLP all come from the low-latitude ocean surface regardless of whether it is affected by long-distance typhoons. The main water vapor transport channels of SHEP both come from the long-distance ocean surface, and are finally transported to northwestern Hunan around 650 hPa in the form of warm and wet airflow, whether affected by long-distance typhoons or not. The CTSLP is mainly characterized by a significant water vapor confrontation between the north and the south, a large temperature difference, and the baroclinicity of the atmosphere in the rainstorm area. From the height evolution of the water vapor channel, the water vapor from the South China Sea is transported to the lower atmosphere below 850 hPa, while the water vapor from the Arabian Sea is transported to the vicinity of 650 hPa. The θse of water vapor from the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal is higher, while the θse of water vapor from the South China Sea and the high inland is lower, but for SHEP, the θse of water vapor from the high inland is larger than that of CTSLP. The analysis of the characteristics of water vapor transport and its sources under various weather types in northwestern Hunan is helpful to deepen the understanding of the characteristics of water vapor transport in northwestern Hunan and provide reference for the prediction of extreme rainstorms in northwest Hunan.

Water vapor budget comparative analysis

In order to quantitatively analyze the water vapor transport and budget of three different types of extreme value rainstorms in northwestern Hunan, the boundary water vapor flux and regional water vapor budget of three types of extreme value rainstorms in northwestern Hunan were analyzed.

It can be seen from the vertical integration of water vapor flux on the boundary of northwestern Hunan that the same characteristics of the three types of extreme value rainstorms are as follows (Figure 10): The southern boundary is the most important water vapor input boundary in the extreme value rainstorm area of northwestern Hunan, and the contribution of 800 hPa is the largest. The second is the western boundary, while the eastern boundary and the northern boundary are the outflow boundaries, which is consistent with the conclusion that the water vapor is mainly input into the extreme value rainstorm area from the south and west directions by the low-latitude ocean surface from the trajectory analysis in Section 5.1. In addition, the water vapor income in the region is positive, which means that the extreme value rainstorm area is the water vapor convergence area. The differences in the characteristics of water vapor flux at the boundary of each weather situation are as follows: The water vapor input of the SVWSLP is mainly from 900 to 500 hPa, and its water vapor income is the most in the three weather types. The water vapor input of the CTSLP is mainly from 900 to 400 hPa, and the water vapor input at the southern and western boundaries and the water vapor output at the northern and eastern boundaries are the least. The water vapor income is second only to the SVWSLP. The water vapor input of the SHEP mainly comes from 900 to 400 hPa. The water vapor input of the south and west boundaries and the water vapor output of the north and east boundaries are the most, and the water vapor budget is the least.
Figure 10

From top to bottom, the vertical integration of the average water vapor flux (left, unit: 107 kg/s) and the vertical distribution of the average water vapor flux (right, unit: g · cm−1 · hPa−1 s−1) at each boundary of the extreme value rainstorm area in northwestern Hunan. SVWSLP (a, b), SHEP (c, d) and CTSLP (e, f).

Figure 10

From top to bottom, the vertical integration of the average water vapor flux (left, unit: 107 kg/s) and the vertical distribution of the average water vapor flux (right, unit: g · cm−1 · hPa−1 s−1) at each boundary of the extreme value rainstorm area in northwestern Hunan. SVWSLP (a, b), SHEP (c, d) and CTSLP (e, f).

Close modal

In the past 60 years, the average daily extreme precipitation threshold in northwest Hunan is 71.6 mm, with an average of 22 times per year. The interannual variation of the frequency of extreme precipitation is similar to the interannual variation trend of the threshold, with an obvious mutation in 1995. Before 1995, both the threshold and the frequency of extreme precipitation were small, while after 1995, both the threshold and the frequency of extreme precipitation were large. The main daily extreme value rainstorm in northwestern Hunan is concentrated in 200–300 mm, and the maximum is 455.5 mm at Zhangjiajie station, which is also the daily value extreme rainstorm in Hunan Province. Extreme value rainstorms are concentrated in May–August, most in July.

Extreme value rainstorm is the result of the interaction of various influence systems, and in northwest Hunan can be divided into three categories: SVWSLP has the highest frequency of occurrence, and the typical characteristics are southwest vortex and herringbone shear in the east of the plateau at 850 hPa. For SHEP, the WPSH is strong, and northwest Hunan is on the edge of the subtropical high with a low-level shear line. For CTSLP, the trough is deep, and there is a combined effect of cold shear and weak cold air in northwestern Hunan. In work, forecasters should analyze the conditions, structural characteristics and evolution process of micro-scale systems, based on large-scale weather classification. At the same time, with reference to the numerical forecast (especially the extreme forecast of a few members of the ensemble forecast) and the comprehensive observation data, the possible falling area, intensity and starting and ending time of extreme precipitation are accurately forecasted, and the early warning signal is issued in time in the approaching stage.

The water vapor transport channels of SVWSLP with long-distance typhoons and without long-distance typhoons all come from the low-latitude ocean surface. The most important water vapor transport channel of SHEP with long-distance typhoons is from the Arabian Sea and of SHEP without long-distance typhoons is from the Bay of Bengal, which come from the long-distance ocean surface, and are finally transported to northwestern Hunan around 650 hPa in the form of warm and wet airflow. The CTSLP is mainly characterized by a significant water vapor confrontation between the north and the south, a large temperature difference, and the baroclinicity of the atmosphere in the rainstorm area. The θse of water vapor from the Arabian Sea and the Bay of Bengal is higher, while the θse of water vapor from the South China Sea and the high inland is lower, but for SHEP, the θse of water vapor from the high inland is larger than that of CTSLP.

For the three weather patterns, the southern boundary is the most important water vapor input boundary in the extreme value rainstorm area of northwestern Hunan, the second is the western boundary. The water vapor income in the region is positive, which means that the extreme value rainstorm area is the water vapor convergence area. A large amount of water vapor in the lower layer converges and is transported to the middle and upper troposphere through a strong vertical ascending motion to accumulate and condense, resulting in precipitation. The larger the boundary water vapor transport, the stronger the water vapor convergence in the region, and the stronger the rainfall.

Therefore, we systematically summarized the weather pattern of extreme rainstorms and analyzed the water vapor transport of each type by using backward trajectories. This can not only provide a scientific basis for accurate prediction of such events, but also is necessary for severe convective weather forecasting and pre-warning. At the same time, it is conducive to the further development and improvement of extreme precipitation forecasting technology in northwest Hunan.

The study is supported by the Key Projects of Hunan Meteorological Bureau (CXFZ2022-ZDZX01), Hunan Meteorological Bureau Innovation and Development Project (CXFZ2022-FZZX24), the Operational Capacity Building Project of Hunan Meteorological Bureau (NLJS15), Hunan Meteorological Bureau Research Business Forecasting Project (XQKJ22C008) and Hunan Meteorological Bureau Research Business Forecasting Project (XQKJ21C010). We thank Dr Zhongxi Lin for helpful discussions. Constructive comments and suggestions from two anonymous reviewers greatly improved the manuscript.

Data cannot be made publicly available; readers should contact the corresponding author for details.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Chen
H. Z.
2021
Climatic characteristics and weather system classification of extreme precipitation in Hunan Province
.
Meteorol. Mon.
47
(
10
),
1219
1232
(in Chinese)
.
Chen
H. Z.
,
Ye
C. Z.
,
Chen
J. J.
&
Luo
Z. R.
2019
Analysis of water vapor transport and budget during persistent heavy rainfall over Hunan Province in June 2017
.
Meteorol. Mon.
45
(
9
),
1213
1226
(in Chinese)
.
Draxler
R. R.
&
Hess
G. D.
1998
An overview of the HYSPLIT_4 modeling system for trajectories, dispersion and deposition
.
Aust. Meteorol. Magazine
47
,
295
308
.
Gao
T.
&
Xie
L.
2014
Study on progress of the trends and physical causes of extreme precipitation in China during the last 50 years
.
Adv. Earth Sci.
29
(
5
),
577
589
.
doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2014.05.0577. (in Chinese)
.
Gimeno
L.
,
Drumond
A.
,
Nieto
R.
,
Trigo
R. M.
&
Stohl
A.
2010
On the origin of continental precipitation
.
Geophys. Res. Lett.
37
(
13
),
L13804
.
doi:10.1029/2010GL043712
.
Gochis
D.
,
Schumacher
R.
,
Friedrich
K.
,
Doesken
N.
,
Kelsch
M.
,
Sun
J.
,
Ikeda
K.
,
Lindsey
D.
,
Wood
A.
,
Dolan
B.
,
Matrosov
S.
,
Newman
A.
,
Mahoney
K.
,
Rutledge
S.
,
Johnson
R.
,
Kucera
P.
,
Kennedy
P.
,
Sempere-Torres
D.
,
Steiner
M.
,
Roberts
R.
,
Wilson
J.
,
Yu
W.
,
Chandrasekar
V.
,
Rasmussen
R.
,
Anderson
A.
&
Brown
B.
2015
The great Colorado flood of September 2013
.
Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc.
96
,
1461
1487
.
Goswami
B. N.
,
Venugopal
V.
,
Sengupta
D.
,
Madhusoodanan
M.
&
Xavier
P.
2006
Increasing trend of extreme rain events over India in a warming environment
.
Science
314
(
5804
),
1442
1445
.
Grams
C. M.
,
Binder
H.
,
Pfahl
S.
,
Piaget
N.
&
Wernli
H.
2014
Atmospheric processes triggering the central European floods in June 2013
.
Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci.
14
,
1691
1702
.
Hu
Y.
,
Liu
H. W.
,
Cai
R. H.
,
Su
T.
&
Zhang
X.
2022
Analysis on the causes of a flood-causing extreme rainstorm affected by vortex in Hunan province
.
Plateau Mountain Meteorol. Res.
42
(
4
),
67
74
(in Chinese)
.
Jiang
Z.
,
Liang
Z.
,
Liu
Z.
&
Zhu
Y.
2011
A diagnostic study of water vapor transport and budget during heavy precipitation over the Huaihe River basin in 2007
.
Chinese J. Atmos. Sci.
35
(
2
),
361
372
(in Chinese)
.
Jiang
Z. H.
,
Ren
W.
,
Liu
Z. Y.
&
Yang
H.
2013
Analysis of water vapor transport characteristics during the Meiyu over the Yangtze Huaihe River valley using the Lagrangian method
.
Acta Meteorol. Sinica
71
(
2
),
295
304
(in Chinese)
.
Kharin
V.
&
Zwiers
F. W.
2005
Estimating extremes in transient climate change simulations
.
J. Clim.
18
(
8
),
1156
1173
.
Li
Y.
,
Zhang
W.
,
Chen
S.
&
Han
F.
2019
Characteristics and causes of extreme precipitation in southwestern Hubei during 2008–2017
.
J. Arid Meteorol.
37
(
6
),
875
884
.
doi:10.11755/j.issn.1006-7639(2019)-06-0875. (in Chinese)
.
Ran
L. K.
,
Ll
S. W.
,
Zhou
Y. S.
,
Yang
S.
,
Ma
S. P.
,
Zhou
K.
,
Shen
D. D.
,
Jiao
B. F.
&
Li
N.
2021
Observational analysis of the dynamic, thermal, and water vapor characteristics of the ‘7.20’ extreme rainstorm event in Henan Province, 2021
.
Chinese J. Atmos. Sci.
45
(
6
),
1366
1383
.
doi:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.2109.21160. (in Chinese)
.
Salih
A. A. M.
,
Zhang
Q.
&
Tjernström
M.
2015
Lagrangian tracing of Sahelian Sudan moisture sources
.
J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos.
120
(
14
),
6793
6808
.
doi:10.1002/2015JD023238
.
Sun
J.
&
Zhang
F. Q.
2017
Daily extreme precipitation and trends over China
.
Sci. China Earth Sci.
60
,
2190
2203
.
doi:10.1007/s11430-016-9117-8. (in Chinese)
.
Takahashi
H. G.
,
Fujinami
H.
,
Yasunari
T.
,
Matsumoto
J.
&
Baimoung
S.
2015
Role of tropical cyclones along the monsoon trough in the 2011 Thai flood and interannual variability
.
J. Clim.
28
,
1465
1476
.
Tian
Y.
,
Yao
R.
,
Zhao
E.
,
Yao
Q.
&
Pan
X.
2022
The space conceptual models and water vapor characteristics of typical rainstorms during plum rain season
.
Adv. Meteorol.
2022
,
Article ID 6971110
.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/6971110
.
Zeng
Z.
,
Chen
Y.
&
Wang
D.
2020
Observation and mechanism analysis for a record-breaking heavy rainfall event over southern China in August 2018
.
Chinese J. Atmos. Sci.
44
(
4
),
695
715
.
doi:10.3878/j.issn.1006-9895.1906.18265. (in Chinese)
.
Zhai
P. M.
,
Zhang
X. B.
,
Wan
H.
&
Pan
X. H.
2005
Trends in total precipitation and frequency of daily precipitation extremes over China
.
J. Clim.
18
,
1096
1108
.
Zhao
Q.
,
Peng
L.
,
Li
W.
,
Li
J.
&
Ouyang
Y.
2022
Diagnosis of the causation of an extreme rainstorm in Shanxi in April 2021
.
Torrential Rain Disaster
41
(
2
),
109
118
(in Chinese)
.
Zhou
J.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Wu
T.
,
Xu
G.
,
Liu
X.
,
Wang
J.
&
Han
F.
2022
Characteristics of the mesoscale weather system producing extreme rainstorm in boundary layer during the Meiyu front over the middle reaches of Yangtze River
.
Meteorol. Mon.
48
(
8
),
1007
1019
(in Chinese)
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).