In 2022, Thailand was subjected to extensive flooding all over the country in both urban and rural areas, which caused tremendous losses. Better design and construction of infrastructures for timely and sufficient drainage can help mitigate the problems. This requires accurate intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) relationships at or near the problem areas. To obtain an IDF curve, a continuous rain record from an automatic gauge of the area is needed. Some automatic rain-gauge stations are scattered all over the country and are much fewer in number than the daily-reading rain-gauge stations. By applying a simple scaling theory, we can construct IDF curves from the daily rain records. The 37 automatic stations distributed the scaling exponent over the country. Gumbel location and scale parameters, from 30-year rainfall records, were determined. These three parameters were mapped throughout the country and are ready to be used for creating an IDF curve at any location in the country. We verified these parameters to generate IDF curves for three sites in different regions and found very good agreements. The majority of the errors were less than 15%.

  • Flooding is always a big problem in Thailand.

  • This requires accurate intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) relationships at the problem areas.

  • By application of simple scaling theory, we can construct IDF curves from the daily rain records.

  • Gumbel location and scale parameters were mapped throughout the country and ready to be used for creating an IDF curve at any location in the country.

  • The errors by majority were less than 15%.

As a tropical and monsoonal climate country, Thailand is subjected to flooding every year of various degrees and locations. The rainy season spans 6 months from May to October, with the first half dominated by convective rain and the second by tropical cyclones. The rainfall characteristics of the first half are therefore heavy but short-lived, while those of the second are milder but for longer periods. Both flash floods and river floods can occur in Thailand. For example, in 2011, the country's flood claimed 681 lives and caused USD 46.5 billion in damage (Poaponskorn & Meethom 2013). Recently, in 2022, both flash and river floods had cumulative humanitarian impacts on the Thai people. Much of the flooding was exacerbated by major dams being pushed to their capacities, which resulted in raised river levels downstream through the urgent release of water (IFRC 2023). Flood preventions all over the country therefore urgently need to be revised and improved with updated information.

The intensity–duration–frequency (IDF) relationship is a basic tool for flood prevention and other water resource management tasks. It is used to calculate maximum rainfall intensity at a specified rainfall duration and return period. The IDF relationship is normally presented in a graphical form, called an IDF curve, with rainfall intensity on the X-axis and duration on the Y-axis, with a series of return periods. An IDF curve is created from an automatic rainfall record spanning at least 30 years. The maximum annual series of rainfall intensities, extracted from the records for each duration, are related to return periods using probability theory such as Extreme Value Type 1 (EV1). The number of automatic recorders in the whole country is not as large as that of daily recorders, therefore by using the scaling property, we can convert daily IDF relationships to sub-daily ones.

The IDF curves were long studied and established in Thailand, but they were only applied to a small portion of the nation. As a result, Mustonen (1969) first suggested 14 curves: 5 for the Northeast; 2 for the Northern, Central, Eastern, and Southern regions; including 1 for the Western region. The Royal Irrigation Department (RID), Thailand's primary institution in charge of irrigation and drainage, released a complete analysis of IDF curves for all 59 curves, with 20 curves for the North, 10 for the Northeast, 5, 8, 4, and 12 curves, respectively, for the Central, East, West, and South (Bumpenkit 1999). In addition to the developed equations for rainfall intensity, Rittima et al. (2013) updated the IDF curve for rainfall durations of 0.25, 0.50, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12 h, covering 19 provinces and 11 catchment areas. The IDF curves under climate change uncertainty for the Bangkok area were created by Shrestha et al. (2017). Utilizing the Long Ashton Research Station Weather Generator (LARS-WG), a stochastic weather generator, and the rainfall disaggregation tool Hyetos, they investigated a methodology based on the spatial downscaling-temporal disaggregation method (DDM) to develop future IDFs. Additionally, Yamoat et al. (2022) developed IDF curves for six regions of Thailand, i.e., the Northern, Northeastern, Central, Western, Eastern, and Southern regions. They found that using accurate historical sub-hourly rainfall time series to create a set of IDF curves would be more reliable than using forecasted rainfall modeling. However, these IDF curves can be used in a regionally averaged way. If we could find the specific IDF curve for ungauged sites, that would be excellent.

The ability of these techniques to estimate the IDF characteristics for ungauged sites is constrained. They could not transfer the IDF features from gauged sites to other sites. This is due to the fact that at sites where rainfall records are not available or the data sample is small, the ‘Simple Scaling’ method should be used. Here are some examples. Nhat et al. (2008) developed the regional IDF curves based on scaling properties for the Yado River catchment in Japan. Bara et al. (2009) approximated the IDF curves of extreme rainfall by using simple scaling in Slovakia. Chang & Hiong (2013) estimated the sub-daily IDF curves in Singapore using simple scaling. Galiatsatou & Iliadis (2022) studied the IDF curves at ungauged sites in a changing climate for sustainable stormwater networks in the village of Fourni, which is in the northeastern part of the island of Crete in Greece. Casas-Castillo et al. (2022) presented a simple scaling analysis of rainfall in Andalusia (Spain) under different precipitation regimes. Yuksek et al. (2022) created the regional IDF curves with the emphasis of Eastern Black Sea basin in Turkey. In summary, the results of these studies showed the good performance of the regional IDF curves.

The purpose of the study is to investigate the scale variance (or scaling properties) of rainfall for the derivation of IDF relationships at ungauged sites. To determine the scaling behavior of statistical moments over various durations, the scaling properties of intense rainfall are explored in this study, along with the updating of IDF curves across the entire country of Thailand. Firstly, using the annual maximum rainfall intensity (AMRI) records for varying durations and return periods at the 37 selected stations spread all over Thailand, the scaling exponent for each gauge site and the space variation of the scale exponents were explored. The scale exponent and two statistical parameters of 24-h rainfall data can be used to construct the IDF relationships. Secondly, the IDF relationships at any location are constructed by interpolating these parameters from their contour maps. Finally, the regional scaling model's IDF relationships at the ungauged locations are investigated.

The study area was the whole country of Thailand. The rainfall data for analysis herein were collected from 37 continuous rain gauges (from 1990 to 2019). The locations of rain gauge stations are shown in Figure 1. The name and location for recording rain gauges are listed in Table 1. The AMRI series for various durations, including 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h, were taken.
Table 1

The stations and locations

Name of stationsLatitudeLongitude
Narathiwat 6°25′00.0″ 101°49′00.0″ 
Pattani 6°47′00.0″ 101°09′00.0″ 
Songkhla 7°10′55.6″ 100°36′27.7″ 
Trang 7°31′00.0″ 99°37′00.0″ 
Kho Lanta 7°32′00.0″ 99°03′00.0″ 
Phuket Airport 8°06′38.0″ 98°18′45.0″ 
Nakhon Si Thammarat 8°32′16.0″ 99°57′50.0″ 
Takua Pa 8°41′03.0″ 98°15′08.0″ 
Surat Thani 9°08′08.0″ 99°09′07.0″ 
10 Samui 9°28′00.0″ 100°03′00.0″ 
11 Chumphon 10°29′55.5″ 99°11′18.5″ 
12 Prachuap Khiri Khan 11°50′00.0″ 99°50′00.0″ 
13 Hua Hin 12°35′10.0″ 99°57′45.0″ 
14 Pattaya 12°55′12.0″ 100°52′10.0″ 
15 Koh Sichang 13°09′42.0″ 100°48′07.0″ 
16 Chon Buri 13°22′00.0″ 100°59′00.0″ 
17 Bangkok 13°39′59.0″ 100°36′22.0″ 
18 Kanchanaburi 14°01′21.0″ 99°32′09.0″ 
19 Suphan Buri 14°28′28.0″ 100°08′20.0″ 
20 Lop Buri 14°47′59.0″ 100°38′42.0″ 
21 Nakhon Ratchasima 14°58′05.9″ 102°05′09.7″ 
22 Ubon Ratchathani 15°15′00.0″ 104°52′00.0″ 
23 Nakhon Sawan 15°40′18.6″ 100°07′56.5″ 
24 Chaiyaphum 15°48′00.0″ 102°02′00.0″ 
25 Roi Et 16°01′12.0″ 103°44′38.0″ 
26 Phetchabun 16°26′00.0″ 101°09′00.0″ 
27 Khon Kaen 16°27′40.0″ 102°47′23.0″ 
28 Kamphaeng Phet 16°29′12.5″ 99°31′37.1″ 
29 Mukdahan 16°32′29.0″ 104°43′44.0″ 
30 Phitsanulok 16°47′41.3″ 100°16′45.5″ 
31 Tak 16°52′42.0″ 99°08′36.0″ 
32 Sakon Nakhon 17°09′00.0″ 104°08′00.0″ 
33 Uttaradit 17°37′00.0″ 100°06′00.0″ 
34 Nong Khai 17°52′01.8″ 102°43′58.9″ 
35 Lampang 18°17′00.0″ 99°31′00.0″ 
36 Lamphun 18°34′02.0″ 99°02′02.0″ 
37 Chiang Rai 19°57′41.0″ 99°52′53.0″ 
Name of stationsLatitudeLongitude
Narathiwat 6°25′00.0″ 101°49′00.0″ 
Pattani 6°47′00.0″ 101°09′00.0″ 
Songkhla 7°10′55.6″ 100°36′27.7″ 
Trang 7°31′00.0″ 99°37′00.0″ 
Kho Lanta 7°32′00.0″ 99°03′00.0″ 
Phuket Airport 8°06′38.0″ 98°18′45.0″ 
Nakhon Si Thammarat 8°32′16.0″ 99°57′50.0″ 
Takua Pa 8°41′03.0″ 98°15′08.0″ 
Surat Thani 9°08′08.0″ 99°09′07.0″ 
10 Samui 9°28′00.0″ 100°03′00.0″ 
11 Chumphon 10°29′55.5″ 99°11′18.5″ 
12 Prachuap Khiri Khan 11°50′00.0″ 99°50′00.0″ 
13 Hua Hin 12°35′10.0″ 99°57′45.0″ 
14 Pattaya 12°55′12.0″ 100°52′10.0″ 
15 Koh Sichang 13°09′42.0″ 100°48′07.0″ 
16 Chon Buri 13°22′00.0″ 100°59′00.0″ 
17 Bangkok 13°39′59.0″ 100°36′22.0″ 
18 Kanchanaburi 14°01′21.0″ 99°32′09.0″ 
19 Suphan Buri 14°28′28.0″ 100°08′20.0″ 
20 Lop Buri 14°47′59.0″ 100°38′42.0″ 
21 Nakhon Ratchasima 14°58′05.9″ 102°05′09.7″ 
22 Ubon Ratchathani 15°15′00.0″ 104°52′00.0″ 
23 Nakhon Sawan 15°40′18.6″ 100°07′56.5″ 
24 Chaiyaphum 15°48′00.0″ 102°02′00.0″ 
25 Roi Et 16°01′12.0″ 103°44′38.0″ 
26 Phetchabun 16°26′00.0″ 101°09′00.0″ 
27 Khon Kaen 16°27′40.0″ 102°47′23.0″ 
28 Kamphaeng Phet 16°29′12.5″ 99°31′37.1″ 
29 Mukdahan 16°32′29.0″ 104°43′44.0″ 
30 Phitsanulok 16°47′41.3″ 100°16′45.5″ 
31 Tak 16°52′42.0″ 99°08′36.0″ 
32 Sakon Nakhon 17°09′00.0″ 104°08′00.0″ 
33 Uttaradit 17°37′00.0″ 100°06′00.0″ 
34 Nong Khai 17°52′01.8″ 102°43′58.9″ 
35 Lampang 18°17′00.0″ 99°31′00.0″ 
36 Lamphun 18°34′02.0″ 99°02′02.0″ 
37 Chiang Rai 19°57′41.0″ 99°52′53.0″ 
Figure 1

Study area and rain gauge locations. (a) Spatial extent of the study area, (b) the locations of rain gauging stations analyzed. Remark: Dots are those stations used to develop relationships, and triangles are those used for validation.

Figure 1

Study area and rain gauge locations. (a) Spatial extent of the study area, (b) the locations of rain gauging stations analyzed. Remark: Dots are those stations used to develop relationships, and triangles are those used for validation.

Close modal

Simple scaling hypothesis

Hydrologic data from one time scale was converted to another using scaling models in order to avoid the problem of insufficient data. Numerous scholars have looked into the fundamental theoretical development of scaling, including Gupta & Waymire (1990) and Kuzuha et al. (2005). The rainfall intensity I(d) with duration d shows the following equation holds true.
(1)
The equality ‘’ refers to identical probability distributions in both sides of the equation; λ denotes a scale factor which can alter the duration d to another duration, and H is a scaling exponent (Menabde et al. 1999). From Equation (1), it leads to a simple scaling law in a wide sense
(2)
where E[ ] is the expected value operator and q is the moment order. If Equation (2) is true, the random variable I(d) displays simple scale invariance in a wide sense. If H is a non-linear function of q, the I(d) is a general case of multi-scaling. For each moment order q, the moments E[ ] are plotted on a logarithmic chart against the scale λ. Whereupon, the slope function of the order moment K(q) is plotted on the linear chart against the moment order q. If the plotted results are on a straight line through the origin, the random variable shows simple scaling. Otherwise, the multi-scaling approach must be considered (Gupta & Waymire 1990).
The extreme value type I (EVI) distribution, created by Gumbel, is still the most often used distribution by many national meteorological services worldwide to represent rainfall extremes. The IDF curves are frequently fitted to this distribution. In this study, it will be utilized in conjunction with the method of moments. The annual maximum rainfall intensity I(d) has a cumulative probability distribution (CDF), which is given by
(3)
(4)
where T is the return period. The location parameter μ and scale parameter σ to be calculated from data series based on the L-moment method.
(5)
(6)
where and s are mean and standard deviation of the annual maximum intensity series. According to the scaling theory, the IDF formula can be derived (Menabde et al. 1999) with
(7)
(8)
(9)
where the μ24 and σ24 are parameters of 24-h data series. It is worthwhile to note that the simple scaling hypothesis leads to equality between the scale factor and the exponent in the expression relating rainfall intensity and duration. The scale exponent, the location, and the scale parameters of the EVI distribution can be used to derive the IDF relationship from a 24-h data series.

Spatial distribution of scale exponent

The scaling invariance of rainfall can be used to generate the IDF relationship. It depends on the scaling exponent H, the location parameter μ24, and the scale parameter σ24 of the 24-h rainfall
(10)
where T is the return period and d is the duration of rainfall intensity. The regional IDF relationship can be developed based on three parameters. Firstly, the scaling exponent H was to be examined for 37 stations in Thailand. Secondly, the two parameters of statistical analysis: μ24 and σ24 were derived from the distribution of the 24-h AMRI data series. With the values of these parameters at 34 stations, spatial distributions of these parameters are constructed by using the GIS interpolation technique. The IDF relationship for any ungauged point can be derived based on these maps and Equations (7)–(9). To this end, the assumption of scaling was tested at a representative sample of stations across Thailand after the scaling of IDF estimates was confirmed at three sites. The available continuous data at these stations was recorded by the Thai Meteorological Department. An AMRI data set was derived from the data, and the first five moments were calculated for the duration of 0.25- to 24 h. These moments were plotted against duration on a log–log scale to ascertain whether scaling could be assumed.

Estimation of the parameters at ungauged sites

The maps of the three parameters (H, μ24, and σ24) can be constructed by using the inverse-distance-weighted (IDW) interpolation method in ArcGIS. The IDW is an exact local deterministic interpolation for estimating spatial data based on the principle that the data from nearby locations are spatially correlated. This technique calculates an unknown value using the linear sum of known values from other locations and weighting by distance. The nearest known data value will be the most significant or weighted value in estimating the unknown value, and this weighted value will change as the distance between the unknown location and the next known location increases (ESRI 2008). The estimated values were obtained.
(11)
where di is the distance from each of the n observed locations to the location being estimated, and Zi is the observed values at those locations. The parameter is the power value (p), determined by minimizing the RMSE using the cross-validation technique.
The values of the parameters (H, μ24, and σ24) were estimated from isoline maps of the study area. Then the root-mean-square errors (RMSE) and mean absolute relative percentage errors (MRPE) estimation values were obtained.
(12)
(13)
where Ii(d,T)* indicates the rainfall intensity of duration d and return period T estimated by the regional scaling model and Ii(d,T) indicates the rainfall intensity from the EV1 distribution.

The aim of the study was to ascertain whether simple scaling could be used to represent regional IDF relationships for ungauged locations. According to the behavior of scaling relationships in statistical moments over various durations, the scaling properties of extreme rainfall were explored.

Spatial distribution of scale exponent

The results of the spatial distribution analysis show the strong validity of the simple scaling properties of the extreme rainfall in time series. For example at the Bangkok station, which is in the central region of Thailand, the qth moment of the intensity is displayed against the duration in Figure 2. It shows the linear relationship between the data and the fact that there is no break as regards the 0.25- to 24-h duration data. The linearity of the moments exhibited here is comparable to the other 36 stations that were analyzed, demonstrating that scaling appears to be relevant throughout Thailand for the 0.25- to 24-h duration. To examine whether or not the basic scaling applies and to estimate the scale exponent, H, for stations throughout the catchment, the slope function, K(q), was plotted against the moment, q, for each station. The scaling exponent coefficient for the Bangkok station is 0.755, with an R2 value of 0.9999, as shown in Figure 3. This indicates that simple scaling could be assumed at this station instead of the more complex multi-scaling.
Figure 2

Relationship between moment of order q and duration at the Bangkok station.

Figure 2

Relationship between moment of order q and duration at the Bangkok station.

Close modal
Figure 3

Relationship between slope function K(q) and the order moment q at the Bangkok station.

Figure 3

Relationship between slope function K(q) and the order moment q at the Bangkok station.

Close modal

Similar scaling relationships were apparent in the data from the other gauges. This suggests that simple scaling may be appropriate in Thailand for the considered durations. Table 2 displays the findings of the scaling exponent factor H for the 37 stations in Thailand, with high coefficients of determination (R2) ranging from 0.97 to 1.0 for each station. The results indicate a strong validity of the simple scaling property of the extreme rainfall in time series.

Table 2

The parameters at recording rain gauge

Name of stationsScale exponent (H)Location parameter (μ24)Scale parameter (σ24)
Narathiwat 0.554 5.996 2.518 
Pattani 0.647 4.273 1.639 
Songkhla 0.656 4.731 3.005 
Trang 0.682 3.549 1.25 
Kho Lanta 0.695 3.55 1.574 
Phuket Airport 0.71 4.254 1.197 
Nakhon Si Thammarat 0.546 6.685 3.048 
Takua Pa 0.653 6.073 0.888 
Surat Thani 0.748 3.018 2.058 
10 Samui 0.71 5.75 1.225 
11 Chumphon 0.709 3.792 1.749 
12 Prachuap Khiri Khan 0.618 3.965 2.155 
13 Hua Hin 0.756 2.698 1.193 
14 Pattaya 0.728 2.717 1.142 
15 Koh Sichang 0.812 2.976 0.994 
16 Chon Buri 0.812 2.797 0.987 
17 Bangkok 0.755 3.332 1.332 
18 Kanchanaburi 0.821 2.979 0.92 
19 Suphan Buri 0.793 2.169 1.458 
20 Lop Buri 0.703 2.437 1.438 
21 Nakhon Ratchasima 0.723 2.607 0.832 
22 Ubon Ratchathani 0.715 3.253 1.274 
23 Nakhon Sawan 0.75 1.372 1.443 
24 Chaiyaphum 0.778 3.178 0.949 
25 Roi Et 0.697 2.623 1.707 
26 Phetchabun 0.748 1.615 1.462 
27 Khon Kaen 0.699 1.968 1.947 
28 Kamphaeng Phet 0.78 2.367 1.146 
29 Mukdahan 0.729 2.662 1.213 
30 Phitsanulok 0.758 2.737 1.175 
31 Tak 0.783 2.738 1.216 
32 Sakon Nakhon 0.698 3.213 1.861 
33 Uttaradit 0.749 2.414 1.934 
34 Nong Khai 0.67 2.718 1.226 
35 Lampang 0.755 2.506 1.271 
36 Lamphun 0.795 2.542 1.006 
37 Chiang Rai 0.7 3.603 1.224 
 Mean 0.720 3.293 1.477 
 Standard Deviation 0.064 1.225 0.538 
Name of stationsScale exponent (H)Location parameter (μ24)Scale parameter (σ24)
Narathiwat 0.554 5.996 2.518 
Pattani 0.647 4.273 1.639 
Songkhla 0.656 4.731 3.005 
Trang 0.682 3.549 1.25 
Kho Lanta 0.695 3.55 1.574 
Phuket Airport 0.71 4.254 1.197 
Nakhon Si Thammarat 0.546 6.685 3.048 
Takua Pa 0.653 6.073 0.888 
Surat Thani 0.748 3.018 2.058 
10 Samui 0.71 5.75 1.225 
11 Chumphon 0.709 3.792 1.749 
12 Prachuap Khiri Khan 0.618 3.965 2.155 
13 Hua Hin 0.756 2.698 1.193 
14 Pattaya 0.728 2.717 1.142 
15 Koh Sichang 0.812 2.976 0.994 
16 Chon Buri 0.812 2.797 0.987 
17 Bangkok 0.755 3.332 1.332 
18 Kanchanaburi 0.821 2.979 0.92 
19 Suphan Buri 0.793 2.169 1.458 
20 Lop Buri 0.703 2.437 1.438 
21 Nakhon Ratchasima 0.723 2.607 0.832 
22 Ubon Ratchathani 0.715 3.253 1.274 
23 Nakhon Sawan 0.75 1.372 1.443 
24 Chaiyaphum 0.778 3.178 0.949 
25 Roi Et 0.697 2.623 1.707 
26 Phetchabun 0.748 1.615 1.462 
27 Khon Kaen 0.699 1.968 1.947 
28 Kamphaeng Phet 0.78 2.367 1.146 
29 Mukdahan 0.729 2.662 1.213 
30 Phitsanulok 0.758 2.737 1.175 
31 Tak 0.783 2.738 1.216 
32 Sakon Nakhon 0.698 3.213 1.861 
33 Uttaradit 0.749 2.414 1.934 
34 Nong Khai 0.67 2.718 1.226 
35 Lampang 0.755 2.506 1.271 
36 Lamphun 0.795 2.542 1.006 
37 Chiang Rai 0.7 3.603 1.224 
 Mean 0.720 3.293 1.477 
 Standard Deviation 0.064 1.225 0.538 

Estimation of the parameters at ungauged sites

The spatial distribution maps of the scaling exponent parameters H generated by the 34 stations are shown in Figure 4. By using statistical analysis based on the L-moment approach, it is possible to determine the location parameter μ24 and scale parameter σ24 of the EV1 distribution of the 24-h AMRI. The results are shown in Table 2. With the same technique, two maps of statistical parameters can be constructed, as shown in Figures 5 and 6. It is expected that those three maps are applicable for any ungauged locations within Thailand and that it is required to verify these maps for regional IDF relationships.
Figure 4

Spatial distribution of the scaling exponent (H) of 24-h intensity. Remark: Dots are those stations used to develop relationships, and triangles are those used for validation.

Figure 4

Spatial distribution of the scaling exponent (H) of 24-h intensity. Remark: Dots are those stations used to develop relationships, and triangles are those used for validation.

Close modal
Figure 5

Spatial distribution of the location parameter (μ24) of 24-h intensity. Remark: Dots are those stations used to develop relationships, and triangles are those used for validation.

Figure 5

Spatial distribution of the location parameter (μ24) of 24-h intensity. Remark: Dots are those stations used to develop relationships, and triangles are those used for validation.

Close modal
Figure 6

Spatial distribution of the scale parameter (σ24) of 24-h intensity. Remark: Dots are those stations used to develop relationships, and triangles are those used for validation.

Figure 6

Spatial distribution of the scale parameter (σ24) of 24-h intensity. Remark: Dots are those stations used to develop relationships, and triangles are those used for validation.

Close modal

As a result of the hilly terrain in the north and east of Thailand, and there are not many observatories there, it is better to have information on the surrounding areas from neighboring countries that the IDW method will be more accurate to generate IDF curves at these locations. However, the IDW method outperforms multi-quadric interpolation and traditional kriging (Ware 2005).

Application and validation of the regional scaling model

The regional scaling model can be applied at any site in the study region for storm duration d equal to 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h. For each storm duration d and return period T, the design storm I(d,T) can be evaluated as follows:

  • (1)

    Estimate the local scale exponent (H) value for the site of interest by interpolating from the map in Figure 4.

  • (2)

    Estimate the location and scale parameters (μ24 and σ24) of 24-h duration from Figures 5 and 6, respectively.

  • (3)

    Calculate μd and σd of a specified duration, d, from Equations (8) and (9), respectively.

  • (4)

    Calculate the extreme rainfall intensity of specified duration and return period from Equation (7).

For demonstrating the performance of the regional IDF model, which is developed in this study; the calculated rainfall intensities of the nine return periods (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 1,000 years) and nine durations (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h) by using this model were compared with the design storm I(d,T) values estimated by the conventional method, a frequency analysis based on the EV1 distribution, with the observed data. Three stations, namely Chon Buri, Chumphon, and Kamphaeng Phet, were chosen from the study area for validation. These validation gauges were considered as the ungauged sites (the regional scaling model did not use data from these stations). The results are shown in Figures 79.
Figure 7

Comparison of the IDF relationships derived from the regional scaling model and those with the conventional method (EV1) for the Chon Buri station.

Figure 7

Comparison of the IDF relationships derived from the regional scaling model and those with the conventional method (EV1) for the Chon Buri station.

Close modal
Figure 8

Comparison of the IDF relationships derived from the regional scaling model and those with the conventional method (EV1) for the Chumphon station.

Figure 8

Comparison of the IDF relationships derived from the regional scaling model and those with the conventional method (EV1) for the Chumphon station.

Close modal
Figure 9

Comparison of the IDF relationships derived from the regional scaling model and those with the conventional method (EV1) for the Kamphaeng Phet station.

Figure 9

Comparison of the IDF relationships derived from the regional scaling model and those with the conventional method (EV1) for the Kamphaeng Phet station.

Close modal

Tables 3 and 4 show the RMSE and MRPE values that were obtained for nine return periods (2, 5, 10, 25, 50, 100, 200, 500, and 1,000 years) and nine durations (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 2, 3, 6, 12, and 24 h) for three stations. According to the validation results for all three stations, the regional scaling model performed well for Thailand, with a mean relative percentage error that was less than 20%. They performed just as well as the studies in Singapore (Chang & Hiong 2013), Japan (Nhat et al. 2008), Greece (Galiatsatou & Iliadis 2022), Spain (Casas-Castillo et al. 2022), and Turkey (Yuksek et al. 2022).

Table 3

RMSE (mm/h) results of the validation stations

Return period (year)Chon BuriChumphonKamphaeng Phet
5.50 5.16 5.21 
8.80 5.03 7.48 
10 11.00 6.99 9.05 
25 13.78 10.32 11.08 
50 15.85 13.01 12.60 
100 17.90 15.76 14.12 
200 19.94 18.55 15.64 
500 23.96 17.06 21.64 
1,000 37.88 21.89 32.64 
Return period (year)Chon BuriChumphonKamphaeng Phet
5.50 5.16 5.21 
8.80 5.03 7.48 
10 11.00 6.99 9.05 
25 13.78 10.32 11.08 
50 15.85 13.01 12.60 
100 17.90 15.76 14.12 
200 19.94 18.55 15.64 
500 23.96 17.06 21.64 
1,000 37.88 21.89 32.64 
Table 4

MRPE (%) results of the validation stations

Return period (year)Chon BuriChumphonKamphaeng Phet
10.05 9.19 9.43 
12.04 6.27 10.11 
10 13.38 5.66 10.46 
25 14.68 7.49 10.76 
50 15.39 9.16 10.91 
100 15.96 10.52 11.04 
200 16.42 11.67 11.13 
500 10.80 8.08 9.67 
1,000 11.71 6.77 9.96 
Return period (year)Chon BuriChumphonKamphaeng Phet
10.05 9.19 9.43 
12.04 6.27 10.11 
10 13.38 5.66 10.46 
25 14.68 7.49 10.76 
50 15.39 9.16 10.91 
100 15.96 10.52 11.04 
200 16.42 11.67 11.13 
500 10.80 8.08 9.67 
1,000 11.71 6.77 9.96 

Chon Buri station is in the east, and Kamphaeng Phet station is in the north; both have hilly terrain and are poorly gauged (see Figure 1). The study of Erazo (2020), on rainfall intensity interpolations in poorly gauged and mountainous areas of Ecuador, shows that the IDW method is the most efficient way to represent both the spatial pattern of precipitation throughout Ecuador and the daily volumes of areal precipitation at the catchment scale (Erazo 2020). Since Thailand is also a tropical country with some hilly areas like Ecuador, we conclude that the three simple scale parameters of the interpolation for Thailand could be evaluated by the IDW interpolation technique.

Flooding is always a big problem in Thailand as a result of insufficient drainage systems for both urban and rural areas. To mitigate this problem, an accurate IDF relationship for the site must be used for hydraulic infrastructure design. Because continuous rain records in the country are significantly fewer in number than daily records, we used simple scale theory to calculate a scale exponent from each of the 37 AMS across the country. Regarding the 30-year records of daily rainfall, AMS of extreme daily rainfall intensity were extracted and used to obtain location and scale parameters. The interpolation values of the scale exponent and the parameters of location and scale were mapped and ready to be used. The IDF curves from three at-site records were used for validating the result. This showed that, by and large, the errors were less than 15%. The proposed maps can help generate an accurate IDF curve at any site in Thailand.

This research was funded by the College of Industrial Technology, King Mongkut's University of Technology North Bangkok (Grant No. Res-CIT0299/2022).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Bara
M.
,
Kohnava
S.
,
Gaal
L.
,
Szolgay
J.
&
Hlavcova
K.
2009
Estimation of IDF curves of extreme rainfall by simple scaling in Slovakia
.
Contributions to Geophysics and Geodesy
39
(
3
),
187
206
.
Bumpenkit
P.
1999
The Relationship of Rainfall Intensity Duration Frequency of Difference Regions in Thailand
.
Report Royal Irrigation Department (RID)
,
Thailand
.
Casas-Castillo
M. d. C.
,
Rodríguez-Solà
R.
,
Llabrés-Brustenga
A.
,
García-Marín
A. P.
,
Estévez
J.
&
Navarro
X.
2022
A simple scaling analysis of rainfall in Andalusia (Spain) under different precipitation regimes
.
Water
14
,
1303
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14081303
.
Chang
C. W.
&
Hiong
S.
2013
Estimation of sub-daily IDF curves in Singapore using simple scaling
. In
Proceeding Paper in Impact World 2013, International Conference on Climate Change Effects
,
May 27–28, 2013
,
Potsdam
.
Erazo
B.
2020
Representing Past and Future Hydro-Climatic Variability Over Multi-Decadal Periods in Poorly-Gauged Regions: The Case of Ecuador
.
Thesis
,
Université Paul Sabatier
,
Toulouse
,
France
.
ESRI
2008
ArcGIS Desktop 9.3 User Manual
.
Redlands, CA
,
USA
.
Galiatsatou
P.
&
Iliadis
C.
2022
Intensity-duration-frequency curves at ungauged sites in a changing climate for sustainable stormwater networks
.
Sustainability
14
(
3
),
1229
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031229
.
Gupta
V. K.
&
Waymire
E.
1990
Multiscaling properties of spatial rainfall and river flow distributions
.
Journal of Geophysical Research
95
(
3
),
1999
2009
.
IFRC
2023
Thailand Monsoon Flood 2022 – Operational Update, Appeal no. MDRTH002
.
International Federation of Red Cross and Red Crescent Societies
.
Kuzuha
Y.
,
Komatsu
Y.
,
Tomosugi
K.
&
Kishii
T.
2005
Regional flood frequency analysis, scaling and PUB
.
Journal of Japan Society of Hydrology and Water Resources
18
(
4
),
441
458
.
Menabde
M.
,
Seed
A.
&
Pegram
G.
1999
A simple scaling model for extreme rainfall
.
Water Resources Research
35
(
1
),
335
339
.
Mustonen
S. E.
1969
Rainfall-Intensity-Frequency Curves for Some Stations in Thailand. The Thai Meteorological Department, Bangkok, Thailand
.
Nhat
L. M.
,
Tachikawa
Y.
,
Sayama
T.
&
Takara
K.
2008
Development of the regional rainfall intensity-duration-frequency curves based on scaling properties
.
Annual Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
52
,
85
90
.
Poaponskorn
N.
&
Meethom
P.
2013
Impact of the 2011 floods, and flood management in Thailand
. In:
ERIA Discussion Paper Series
.
Rittima
A.
,
Piemfa
K.
,
Uthai
N.
&
Jantaramana
A.
2013
An improvement of design rainfall analysis of the central basin of Thailand
.
Research and Development Journal
24
(
4
),
28
38
.
Ware
E. C.
2005
Correction to Radar-Estimated Precipitation Using Observed Rain Gauge Data
.
MS Thesis
,
Cornell University
,
New York
,
USA
.
Yamoat
N.
,
Hanchoowong
R.
,
Sriboonlue
S.
&
Kangrang
A.
2022
Temporal change of extreme precipitation intensity-duration-frequency relationships in Thailand
.
Journal of Water and Climate Change
13
(
2
),
839
852
.
Yuksek
Ö.
,
Anilan
T.
,
Saka
F.
&
Örgun
E.
2022
Rainfall intensity-duration-frequency analysis in Turkey, with the emphasis of Eastern Black Sea basin
.
Teknik Dergi
33
(
4
),
12087
12103
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).