This study is the first study that worked on the temporal and spatial distributions of annual rainfall (Pyear) and maximum 24-h rainfall (Pmax24h) in the Semnan province. For this purpose, different statistical distributions were used to estimate the temporal Pyear and Pmax24h in the Semnan province. Six synoptic stations across the province were studied and all stations had complete Pyear and Pmax24h data. Different return periods were studied. The goodness fit test of statistical distributions for Pyear showed that about 67% of the stations follow the Generalized Pareto (GP) distribution. Considering the Pmax24h, 50% of the stations follow the GP distribution, and for the ratio of Pmax24h to Pyear, 50% of stations follow the Generalized Extreme Value (GEV) distribution. The spatial distribution of Pyear and Pmax24h showed that in all return periods, by moving to the southeast of the province, precipitation amounts decreased. While moving toward the Shahmirzad station, the amounts of Pyear and Pmax24h increased. Also, there was a logical relationship between the Pyear and Pmax24h. Consequently, the minimum value and the maximum value of the R2 coefficient in different return periods were equal to 0.992 and 0.980, respectively.

  • Statistical analysis was effective in calculating the highest average annual rainfall and the highest average 24-h load.

  • The use of geostatistical methods and statistical distributions shows a good performance in predicting the amount of precipitation.

  • The use of statistical distributions and geostatistical methods can be appropriate in locating the establishment of a meteorological station.

Predicting precipitation under the temporal and spatial distributions has great importance in water engineering, hydraulic structures, and water resources management (Krajewski & Smith 2002; Gräler et al. 2013; Volpi & Fiori 2014; Ghazvinian et al. 2020d, 2021; Ugbaje & Bishop 2020; Dadrasajirlou et al. 2023). The importance of this probabilistic forecast has increased in recent years due to the phenomenon of climate change and land-use change (Dore 2005; Fujita 2008; Flannigan et al. 2016; Konapala et al. 2020; Hu et al. 2021).

The spatio-temporal distribution of precipitation has shown a straightforward relationship for providing accessible water resources for humans and ecosystems (Milly et al. 2005; Oki & Kanae 2006; Mishra et al. 2011). Therefore, changes in precipitation due to human-caused climate change in the 21st century may result in changes in water accessibility (WA) that have implications for both humans and the biosphere (Haddeland et al. 2014; Schewe et al. 2014). Studies have examined several simultaneous changes in the Pyear and Pmax24h in these variables (Holdridge 1947; Thornthwaite 1948; Kottek et al. 2006). Furthermore, the characteristics of annual rainfall and 24-hour rainfall, even in arid regions, are the main basis for WA studies in existing climate classifications (Feng et al. 2013; Rajah et al. 2014). Also, changes in Pyear cause drought, increase water stress in human society, and have adverse effects on agriculture and food production (Vaziri et al. 2018). Thus, 24-h rainfall impacts flood events.

Geostatistical methods are based on spatial variation functions (Eftekhari et al. 2021). Spatial variation functions are generally fitted using parametric methods, such as Kriging and inverse distance weighted (IDW). IDW and Kriging consider the influence of covariates on the predicted variable and use the spatial autocorrelation of the predicted variable and its cross-correlation information with related covariates, but they have different modeling methods and computational processes. St-Hilaire et al. (2003) evaluated the impact of the density of the network of water and meteorological stations on the estimation of annual and daily precipitation of rainfall and runoff events in the northern United States of America. The results showed that increasing the number of stations has an effect on the quality of estimating the spatial distribution of precipitation in the region.

Cheng et al. (2008) evaluated the rain gauge network using geostatistical methods in order to estimate the regional average of precipitation and point estimation in areas without stations. Variogram analysis showed that hourly rainfall has higher spatial changes than annual rainfall.

Therefore, forecasting Pyear and Pmax24h can help in planning and managing water resources. On the other hand, the phenomenon of climate change has increased the occurrence of marginal precipitation. In addition, due to the increase in the urban area, the runoff coefficient in catchments has increased. These have caused the catchments to be more sensitive to rainfall and, as a result, produce more floods than in previous years. This issue leads to an increasingly irreparable loss of life and property. In rainfall forecasting, a lot of research has been conducted with temporal and spatial distribution approaches and intelligent models (Nasseri et al. 2008; Mekanik et al. 2013; Solgi et al. 2016; Azad et al. 2019; Zhang et al. 2020). Also, studies such as Bayat et al. (2019) optimized rainfall estimation based on spatial variations of rainfall. In recent years, extensive scientific studies have been conducted to predict precipitation by considering the temporal and spatial distribution in different parts of the world.

Pmax24h is used to calculate the maximum flow in the design of high-risk structures such as dams and nuclear power plants. Also, by using Pmax24h, the maximum possible flood can be calculated. The calculation of Pmax24h is based on the extreme and exceptional conditions of factors such as the continuity of rainfall, time distribution of rainfall, and infiltration, which requires a lot of data and information.

Geo-statistics is a branch of statistics that investigates natural phenomena that are both random and structural (Çadraku 2021). Geo-statistics originated from mineral resource assessment, but it has been widely used in many fields such as climate, hydrology, environment, and ecology (Çadraku 2022).

Spatial interpolation is the traditional way to transform point-wise rainfall into areal rainfall. It is a process of tapping and utilizing the spatial autocorrelation of rainfall and spatial intercorrelation between rainfall and related explanatory variables under a specific mathematical framework. The spatial distribution of precipitation and temporal distribution plays a critical role in the implementation of development projects. Using the spatial distribution of rainfall can help to determine the risk of floods or landslides in an area.

Fitting theoretical distributions using real data can be used to obtain the probability of occurrence or return period of natural phenomena. By choosing the appropriate statistical distribution, a better estimation of the return period of extreme phenomena with a low occurrence probability can be made, thus increasing the efficiency and reliability of water projects. Precipitation prediction in basins and rivers with different return periods that have statistical information can be conducted using theoretical statistical distributions (Rao & Hamed 2000). The advantage of matching the frequency distribution of existing data with a statistical distribution is developing the existing limited statistics to understand the course of events in the future. There is no consensus among hydrologists on using a particular distribution function. But choosing the appropriate statistical distributions whose results are close to reality (have the lowest error) is possible.

Therefore, recently a considerable number of research works in spatial distribution have been published. Husak et al. (2007) have studied the monthly rainfall distribution for drought monitoring. They used the Gamma distribution approach, and the results showed it has a good performance in 98% of stations. Xia et al. 2012 used rainfall data from 27 meteorological stations in China's Huai River Basin to study the trend of marginal rainfall in the region. Based on their study, three statistical distributions, namely GEV, GP, and Gamma were used. The GEV distribution was more accurate according to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) test.

Bhavyashree & Bhattacharyya (2018) used 20 different probability distributions to fit the maximum daily rainfall in Karnataka, India. Their paper results revealed that probabilistic distributions such as Gamma, Pearson 5, and Weibull performed better.

Alam et al. (2018) examined the best probability distribution for predicting maximum monthly rainfall in Bangladesh. The results of their research indicated that in 36% of the stations, the GEV distribution and in 26% of the stations, the Pearson type 3 and Log-Pearson Type 3 distributions had better fit. The probabilistic distribution analysis of marginal precipitation in Mumbai, India, was implemented by Parchure & Gedam (2019) They considered 26 meteorological stations in their research, and the GEV distribution showed better results in 29% of the stations. Frechet and GP probability distributions also performed better in 27 and 22% of stations, respectively.

Li et al. (2020) increased the temporal coverage of precipitation data for reanalysis using Bayesian probabilistic methods. The results showed that the proposed method has a high performance. Lemus-Canovas et al. (2019) used a spatial regression model to investigate the spatial distribution of precipitation in the eastern Pyrenees. Consequently, the results revealed that there is a correlation between the estimated and observed precipitation with the coefficient of explanation (R2 = 0.8).

Khan et al. (2019) studied the spatial distribution of rainfall in the peninsular region of Malaysia from 1951 to 2007. The results showed that the amount of annual precipitation did not change significantly. The trend of regional precipitation had significant changes, which could be due to the increase in design periods with an average of 4.8 and 4.9 days per decade. Iqbal et al. (2019) studied the spatial distribution of precipitation and rainfall trends from 1951 to 2007 in the Himalayas in Pakistan. The results indicated changes in precipitation in summer between 0.25 and 1.25 mm per year. Also, the number of marginal rainfalls and dry days increased. Their research pointed out that increases in these two parameters have led to increased flood and drought.

Vélez et al. (2019) studied the spatial distribution of daily rainfall concentrations at 20 Puerto Rican stations from 1971 to 2010. The results showed that the index value of annual and daily rainfall concentration varies from southeast to northwest.

In general, the Semnan province has a great variety of climates. Also, according to the studies, forecasting the temporal and spatial distribution of precipitation is of great importance in the implementation of development projects and the development of economic infrastructure. On the other hand, the study of the temporal and spatial distribution of precipitation requires a large amount of observational data, making such research works difficult in the region of the Semnan province. In such cases, the use of probabilistic distributions can help study temporal precipitation changes. Therefore, in the present study, the temporal and spatial distribution of Pyear and Pmax24h in the Semnan province have been analyzed. For this purpose, probabilistic distributions and different spatial interpolation methods have been used. Then, the amount of Pyear and Pmax24h and its spatial distribution with 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, and 200-year return periods were predicted. Also, the relationship between Pyear and Pmax24h was estimated in different return periods, which is helpful when the Pmax24h data were missed.

Study area

In the present study, the Semnan province has been selected as the study area. The province has a diverse climate with a predominantly arid climate, except for the mountainous border areas to the north. The reason for choosing this region from Iran is the numerous droughts and floods and adverse economic and social effects (Karimpour Reyhan et al. 2009). The Semnan province is in the range of 34° and 13′ to 37°20′ north latitude and from 51° and 51′ to 57° and 3′ east longitude. This province has an area of 97,491 km2, which includes about 9% of the total area of Iran. Thus, the elevation of this province differs from 645 to 3,885 meters. The aspect slope of this Semnan province is northeast. However, in the northern region of this province, the aspect slope is eastern (Figure 1). The purpose of Figure 1 is to show the difference in the height of stations relative to each other and the location of the studied stations on different slopes. Longitude, latitude, and altitude for the Semnan station are 52°25′, 35°35′, and 1,127, respectively; for the Shahroud station are 54°55′, 36°22′, and 1,325.2, respectively; for the Damghan station are 54°19′, 36°08′, and 1,155.4, respectively; for the Garmsar station are 52°21′, 35°14′, and 899.9, respectively (Ghazvinian et al. 2020b, 2020c; Dehghanipour et al. 2021; Karami et al. 2021; Karami & Ghazvinian 2022). Shahmirzad and Meyami stations have longitude 53°21′ and 55°37′, and latitude 35°46′ and 36°24′, respectively, and finally have a height from the free surface of 1,969 and 1,081 m. The topographic information of the studied area was available and the DEM and slope maps were provided by using ArcGIS software.
Figure 1

Case study: (a) Iran map, (b) DEM layer, and (c) slope layer.

Figure 1

Case study: (a) Iran map, (b) DEM layer, and (c) slope layer.

Close modal
In this province, with decreasing altitude from north to south, the temperature increases, and the rainfall decreases (Bolandakhtar & Golian 2019; Ghazvinian & Karami 2023). By considering the general situation of this province, it can be said that the most severe climate conflict in the north–south axis is seen somewhere with a humid Mediterranean climate in the north and in contrast to the dry climate in the south. Most areas of the Semnan province, especially the southern and central regions, have low rainfall due to various factors such as higher elevation in north and northeast, and aspect slope, high tropical dominance in summer, distance from the sea, lack of access to wet resources, and shelter from the wind. The central part of the province and large parts of the central desert of Iran, located in Semnan, has a Pyear of less than 50 mm and a Pyear of large areas of the province to less than 200 mm. The dry season almost has no significant rainfall in the Semnan province and corresponds to the summer and warm months of the year and the rainy season coincides with the winter and cold days of the year. Figure 2 shows the monthly mean average in the Semnan province. According to Figure 2, 77% of the precipitation amount occurs from January to June (winter and spring).
Figure 2

Monthly mean precipitation in Semnan.

Figure 2

Monthly mean precipitation in Semnan.

Close modal

Data used

In the present research, precipitation information from Semnan, Shahroud, Damghan, Garmsar, Shahmirzad, and Meyami stations has been used to study the temporal and spatial variations of rainfall in the Semnan province. The rainfall data period of Semnan, Shahroud, Damghan, and Garmsar is from 1986 to 2018. This period for Shahmirzad and Meyami stations is from 2001 to 2018 (Table 1).

Table 1

Statistical parameters of used data

Pyear (mm)
Pmax24h(mm)
StationsMeanSTDCVMeanSTDCV
Semnan 136.59 41.76 0.31 21.85 7.38 0.34 
Shahrood 148.17 57.63 0.39 18.56 9.68 0.52 
Dameghan 100.92 33.04 0.33 16.47 5.46 0.33 
Garmsar 112.91 38.55 0.34 19.06 6.74 0.35 
Shahmirzad 182.21 108.99 0.60 24.41 14.56 0.60 
Meyami 124.8 52.17 0.42 18.88 8.68 0.46 
Pyear (mm)
Pmax24h(mm)
StationsMeanSTDCVMeanSTDCV
Semnan 136.59 41.76 0.31 21.85 7.38 0.34 
Shahrood 148.17 57.63 0.39 18.56 9.68 0.52 
Dameghan 100.92 33.04 0.33 16.47 5.46 0.33 
Garmsar 112.91 38.55 0.34 19.06 6.74 0.35 
Shahmirzad 182.21 108.99 0.60 24.41 14.56 0.60 
Meyami 124.8 52.17 0.42 18.88 8.68 0.46 

STD, standard deviation; CV, coefficient of variation.

A time series is predictable if it has long-term memory. This approach is based on whether all the expected phenomena have occurred in the available time series or not (Karamouz et al. 2012).

Hurst (1951), by studying the water level of the Nile River, presented a test for extreme events, now referred to as the Hurst index. The steps of this method are as follows:

At the beginning, the data scale is normalized using Equation (1). By considering a runoff time series of we have:

(1)
where is the amount of precipitation, is the average of the precipitation, and is the amount of normal precipitation. Next, the cumulative time series of runoff is calculated using Equation (2).
(2)
Since the mean of values of z is zero, the last value of Y (Yn), will always be zero. Therefore, the adjusted domain will be equal to Equation (3):
(3)
Since the mean of the Y values is zero, the maximum values will always be greater than or equal to 0 and the minimum values less than or equal to 0. Therefore, the adjusted range is always non-negative. Therefore, the Hurst index is defined as Equation (4):
(4)
where R is the amplitude of the changes, S is the time series standard deviation, a is a fixed number, n is the number of observations, and H is the Hurst index. By drawing the left term of Equation (4) versus log(n), the Hurst index was estimated. According to Hurst's findings, if the Hurst index value is 0.5, it indicates a normal independent process. If it is between 0.5 and 1, the time series is long enough for modeling, and the closer this index is to 1, there is no need to extend the time series data.

HEC-SSP

HEC-SSP software was introduced in 2008 by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for statistical analysis of hydrological data (Brunner & Fleming 2010). This software has different sections, such as data definition and analysis (Harris et al. 2008; Root & Papakos 2010). Primarily, in the present study, the Pyear and Pmax24h were entered in the data definition section. Then, in the analysis and distribution fitting analysis section, different statistical distributions were fitted to the data. In the end, the best statistical distribution was selected, and the amount of precipitation was measured with different return periods for each station. It is necessary to mention that Pyear is calculated based on the summing of daily rainfall in a year. Also, the Pmax24h was the maximum daily rainfall in a year.

Statistical distributions

The present study used various statistical distributions such as Normal, Log normal, Gamble, Pearson type 3, GEV, GP distribution, Exponential distribution, and other distributions. Table 2 shows the formulas for the best distributions in this study (Equations (7)–(12)) (Bury 1999; Karian & Dudewicz 2000; Forbes et al. 2011). The K–S test has been used to measure the adherence of a sample of a particular distribution (Massey 1951; Wilks 1995; Simolo et al. 2010). The statistic of this test represents the most significant difference between the expected and actual frequencies (as an absolute value) measured in different categories (Equation (5)). Gado et al. (2021), Raziei (2021), Zhang & Li (2020) and Zhao et al. (2020) have used the K–S criterion to determine the best statistical distribution:
(5)
where indicates the actual cumulative relative frequency and shows the expected cumulative relative frequency (Jahan et al. 2019).
The χ2 test (Equation (6)) is a good measure of the quality of the data fitting process in the probabilistic distribution used for the data (Coronado-Hernández et al. 2020):
(6)
where χ2 is the value of the chi-square test, Ri is the recorded value, Mi is the modeled value.
Table 2

Statistical distributions

DistributionFormulasParametersEq. number
Normal   (7) 
Log normal   (8) 
GEV 
 
 (9) 
GP 
 
 (10) 
Exponential   (11) 
Triangular  

 
(12) 
DistributionFormulasParametersEq. number
Normal   (7) 
Log normal   (8) 
GEV 
 
 (9) 
GP 
 
 (10) 
Exponential   (11) 
Triangular  

 
(12) 

Spatial interpolation methods

Interpolation is for finding unknown values of some points based on the known values of other points. The most important application of these methods is estimating the spatial distribution based on the discrete points. Kriging, IDW, and RBF methods are some of the most potent interpolation methods used in many studies (Agung Setianto & Tamia Triandini 2013; Gong et al. 2014; Arifin et al. 2015; Ikechukwu et al. 2017; Liu et al. 2020). Therefore in the present study, the mentioned methods were used for spatial interpolation of Pyear and Pmax24h in the Semnan province. In this study, the cross-validation (CV) method was used. The CV method is best known for widespread use in interpolation applications (Hancock & Hutchinson 2002). The main benefit of the CV approach is that it is a clearly defined and user-independent process. The CV approach is not acceptable for surfaces that have an insufficient number of observed input points (Jeffrey et al. 2001).

Radial basis function

The radial basis function (RBF) is one interpolation method developed by Hardy (1971). This method works based on the Euclidian distance of points with each other and calculating RBF. The main relationship in this method is given by Equation (13):
(13)
where is the weight of RBFs is, is the RBF, N is the number of interpolation points.

Inverse distance weighted

The IDW method is one of the interpolation aaproaches that the calculation is based on the values of locations close to the desired one, weighted inversely (Liu et al. 2020). As positions get closer to the desired point, their weights will be considered more compared to farther ones. Against the Kriging method, this method is not considering the assumptions about the spatial relationship among the data (it does not have a variogram). It only assumes that as points are getting nearer to the estimation point, they will be considered similar (Noor et al. 2022). In this method, the inverse distances are considered with a numerical power between 1 and 5, but this number will be regarded as 2 in most cases (Wienhöfer et al. 2023). In IDW as distance increases, the weight decreases rapidly. Therefore, the interpolating calculation results in local answers, and since the weights are never zero, there is no discontinuity in the calculation (Chutsagulprom et al. 2022). But the disadvantage of this approach is that, unlike the Kriging, the map does not produce an estimation error. Another demerit is that this method does not take the shape of the samples into account; consequently, the weights are given to two or more specimens arranged in clusters next to each other with an approximately same direction and equal distance to the desired point, and will be considered similar to the weight given to a single sample that is at the same distance but in a different direction from the desired point (Chutsagulprom et al. 2022; Noor et al. 2022). The mentioned problem in the IDW method is not likely to happen in the Kriging approach due to its clustering properties. Since IDW assesses the weight by considering the inverse of the number of samples (1/n), in the maps prepared, unlike Kriging, the minimum and maximum variables estimated can be seen at the location of the prototypes. The general equation of two-dimensional interpolation using IDW approach in Equation (14) (Arifin Arifin et al. 2015):
(14)
where is the estimated value at position , N stands for the number of known positions adjacent to , refers to assigned weight to the known values in , is the Euclidean distance between each point in the positions and , p relates to the power that is affected by weight on w.

Kriging

Kriging is a method of spatial interpolation, which means that it predicts valueless places based on the correlation of places that have observed values (Gong et al. 2014). In other words, two points close to each other probably have similar values, while two points far apart are less similar in their values. The initial purpose of developing the Kriging method was to use mining based on central samples. The model of spatial diversity can be shown as Equation (15):
(15)
In the above equation, Z(s) is the predicted value in the desired locations, μ(s) is the defining function and describes the trend component of Z(s), and ε(s) represents random residues, this parameter varies locally but is spatially dependent. Conventional Kriging is the simplest form of this method and is based on a constant μ(s) (Goovaerts 1997). Spatial autocorrelation using a semi-variogram is represented by Equation (16) (Goovaerts 1997):
(16)
Considering the equilibrium assumption in the above equation, it can be assumed that the right variance is dependent only on the variations of the vector h. In addition, the assumption that the process is isotropic can be considered correct, so the autocorrelation will only depend on the distance between the observed points. Thus, Equation (17) shows how to estimate the semi-variogram:
(17)

In the above equation, Z(si) and Z(si + h) are values that are at a distance h from each other, and is a set of values of observational distances. Theoretically, the observed values and the values calculated by the Kriging method should be the same. But in reality this does not happen due to the presence of a nugget effect (indicating measurement error or changes in the microscale). Therefore, the values calculated by the Kriging method will largely depend on the appropriate choice of variogram model (Gong et al. 2014). The most important main feature of the Kriging method is that the spatial smoothing is estimated through variograms. Also, the uncertainty estimates for the predicted values are presented as variance. A semi-variogram model is required to determine the expectations at which Kriging variance is calculated.The necessary calculations in this method can be performed in a defined local neighborhood (Goovaerts 1997), but we used global Kriging in this work, using all observations for spatial prediction.

The variogram describes how observations are related to distance (and direction). An exponential model was used for the variogram in Equation (18):
(18)
In the above equation, c is a partial threshold value and therefore represents the variance of a random field. Also, parameter a expresses the distance of autocorrelated observations. Initialization parameters are essential for the geostatistical process, but the variogram model fitting process occurs automatically by minimizing the total weight of the square errors (Equation (19)):
(19)
with γ(h), the value according to the parametric model is minimized.

SURFER

SURFER (Keckler 1994) is very suitable and flexible software for drawing two-dimensional and three-dimensional models. This software has several versions. The latest version is a combination of CAD and SURFER 8 software. This software is very useful in drawing two-dimensional and three-dimensional isometric maps. Three important applications of this software in natural geography are as follows: (1) drawing topographic maps in different scales, (2) drawing isometric weather maps (isothermal, isobars, isohyetal), and (3) designing a three-dimensional model of topographic and geological maps in different scales.

Genetic algorithm

Genetic algorithm (GA) is an evolutionary algorithm for optimization based on extensive and effective search in large spaces based on genes and chromosomes (Ehteram et al. 2018). This search consists of three steps. In the first stage, the initial population, consisting of a set of chromosomes, is formed. In the second stage, the value of each member is measured using the definition of the objective function. In the final step, genetic operators produce new members, which include producing offspring from selected parents and mutating the members, and finally, gradual evolution is performed (Goldberg 1989). The selection stage is based on the fitting degree of members and some of the most suitable chromosomes are selected for reproduction. Finally, genetic operators are implemented on members, and their genetic codes are modified and synthesized (Zhang et al. 2012). In this study, for the GA, the number of family members was 300, the number of offspring was 240, the number of mutant members was 90, the mutation rate was 0.04, and the number of iterative steps was 200. To select parents from family members, the Roulette Wheel Selection method was used.

Evaluation criteria

The error value of each method was calculated using the evaluation criteria, which are Equations (20)–(22). In the study, the Kriging method was more accurate and consistent with the outcomes of Asadzadeh et al. (2017) and Zabihi et al. (2012) researches. In Equations (20)–(22), N is the number of data, is the estimated value, is the measured value, is the estimated mean and is the mean of the measured values (Ghazvinian et al. 2019; Dadrasajirlou et al. 2022; Karami et al. 2022; Ghazvinian et al. 2020a):
(20)
(21)
(22)

Fitting of statistical distributions

Table 3 shows the results of the study of the adequacy of Pyear and Pmax24h based on the Hurst method. According to this table, all the data used in the present study in all stations are adequate.

Table 3

H index for the adequacy of the data

Stations
SemnanShahroodDameghanGarmsarShahmirzadMeyami
Pyear 0.62 0.64 0.58 0.53 0.73 0.66 
Pmax24h 0.65 0.61 0.60 0.56 0.65 0.61 
Stations
SemnanShahroodDameghanGarmsarShahmirzadMeyami
Pyear 0.62 0.64 0.58 0.53 0.73 0.66 
Pmax24h 0.65 0.61 0.60 0.56 0.65 0.61 

The results of the goodness fit test for statistical distributions for the Pyear of the studied stations in the Semnan province are presented in Table 4. According to this table, GP distribution for Semnan, Damghan, Garmsar, and Meyami stations; Gumbel distribution for the Shahroud station; and exponential distribution for the Shahmirzad station had the best fitting results. 66.66% of the studied stations followed the GP distribution, and about 16.67% followed the Gumbel distribution and Exponential distribution. This result may be due to skewness in the distribution of Pyear at the studied stations.

Table 4

Goodness fit test of selected statistical distributions for Pyear in Semnan province

StationsDistributionK–Sχ2R2DistributionK–Sχ2R2DistributionK–Sχ2R2
Semnan GP 0.074 0.140 0.945 GEV 0.077 0.230 0.883 Ln-Normal 0.112 0.273 0.814 
Triangular 0.074 0.144 0.932 Normal 0.083 0.241 0.853 Log10-Normal 0.112 0.726 0.785 
Uniform 0.075 0.228 0.926 G-Logistic 0.103 0.268 0.827 Exponential 0.386 0.781 0.763 
Shahrood Gumbel 0.129 0.133 0.952 Logistic 0.158 0.246 0.901 GP 0.180 0.621 0.853 
GEV 0.158 0.187 0.938 Normal 0.180 0.261 0.886 Exponential 0.395 0.630 0.829 
Dameghan GP 0.084 0.238 0.932 Normal 0.109 0.911 0.897 G-Logistic 0.132 1.038 0.832 
Uniform 0.085 0.328 0.925 Ln-Normal 0.118 0.963 0.883 Exponential 0.373 1.083 0.813 
GEV 0.105 0.545 0.908 Log10-Normal 0.118 0.982 0.864 Empirical 0.397 1.248 0.804 
Garmsar GP 0.095 0.157 0.966 G-Logistic 0.112 0.403 0.918 Ln-Normal 0.186 0.7289 0.881 
Triangular 0.096 0.178 0.954 Normal 0.112 0.642 0.903 Log10-Normal 0.186 0.810 0.869 
GEV 0.099 0.294 0.938 Uniform 0.119 0.666 0.892 Exponential 0.315 1.316 0.850 
Shahmirzad Exponential 0.097 0.006 0.965 GEV 0.142 0.011 0.928 Normal 0.167 0.104 0.894 
Triangular 0.126 0.009 0.951 Uniform 0.150 0.091 0.903 GP 0.254 0.111 0.879 
Meyami GP 0.105 0.001 0.973 Normal 0.130 0.005 0.931 Log10-Normal 0.210 0.017 0.897 
GEV 0.118 0.002 0.953 Uniform 0.130 0.007 0.923 Exponential 0.210 0.098 0.885 
G-Logistic 0.126 0.004 0.942 Ln-Normal 0.147 0.013 0.906 Empirical 0.336 0.101 0.867 
StationsDistributionK–Sχ2R2DistributionK–Sχ2R2DistributionK–Sχ2R2
Semnan GP 0.074 0.140 0.945 GEV 0.077 0.230 0.883 Ln-Normal 0.112 0.273 0.814 
Triangular 0.074 0.144 0.932 Normal 0.083 0.241 0.853 Log10-Normal 0.112 0.726 0.785 
Uniform 0.075 0.228 0.926 G-Logistic 0.103 0.268 0.827 Exponential 0.386 0.781 0.763 
Shahrood Gumbel 0.129 0.133 0.952 Logistic 0.158 0.246 0.901 GP 0.180 0.621 0.853 
GEV 0.158 0.187 0.938 Normal 0.180 0.261 0.886 Exponential 0.395 0.630 0.829 
Dameghan GP 0.084 0.238 0.932 Normal 0.109 0.911 0.897 G-Logistic 0.132 1.038 0.832 
Uniform 0.085 0.328 0.925 Ln-Normal 0.118 0.963 0.883 Exponential 0.373 1.083 0.813 
GEV 0.105 0.545 0.908 Log10-Normal 0.118 0.982 0.864 Empirical 0.397 1.248 0.804 
Garmsar GP 0.095 0.157 0.966 G-Logistic 0.112 0.403 0.918 Ln-Normal 0.186 0.7289 0.881 
Triangular 0.096 0.178 0.954 Normal 0.112 0.642 0.903 Log10-Normal 0.186 0.810 0.869 
GEV 0.099 0.294 0.938 Uniform 0.119 0.666 0.892 Exponential 0.315 1.316 0.850 
Shahmirzad Exponential 0.097 0.006 0.965 GEV 0.142 0.011 0.928 Normal 0.167 0.104 0.894 
Triangular 0.126 0.009 0.951 Uniform 0.150 0.091 0.903 GP 0.254 0.111 0.879 
Meyami GP 0.105 0.001 0.973 Normal 0.130 0.005 0.931 Log10-Normal 0.210 0.017 0.897 
GEV 0.118 0.002 0.953 Uniform 0.130 0.007 0.923 Exponential 0.210 0.098 0.885 
G-Logistic 0.126 0.004 0.942 Ln-Normal 0.147 0.013 0.906 Empirical 0.336 0.101 0.867 

Table 5 shows the goodness fit test results of statistical distributions for Pmax24h in the studied stations. According to Table 5, in 50% of the stations, the best distribution is related to the GP distribution. About 16.67% of stations follow Log normal, Exponential distribution, and Value Generalized Extreme distributions. Table 6 shows the goodness fit test outcomes of statistical distributions for the ratio of Pmax24h to Pyear in the studied stations. According to Table 6, in 50% of the stations, the best distribution is related to the GEV distribution. About 16.67% of stations follow normal, triangular, and GP distribution. In Tables 46, the best Distribution has been highlighted, and other statistical distributions at lower ranks have been shown.

Table 5

Goodness fit test of selected statistical distributions for maximum 24-h rainfall in Semnan province

StationsDistributionK–Sχ2R2DistributionK–Sχ2R2DistributionK–Sχ2R2
Semnan GP 0.102 0.007 0.971 Ln-Normal 0.140 0.032 0.934 Normal 0.166 0.042 0.887 
Triangular 0.123 0.008 0.965 Log10-Normal 0.140 0.037 0.921 G-Logistic 0.178 0.055 0.872 
Uniform 0.123 0.009 0.952 GEV 0.144 0.041 0.902 Exponential 0.402 0.177 0.854 
Shahrood GP 0.098 0.091 0.935 Gumbel 0.114 0.206 0.903 Empirical 0.120 0.548 0.874 
GEV 0.104 0.184 0.924 Triangular 0.117 0.247 0.892 Shifted Exponential 0.141 0.551 0.865 
Logistic 0.110 0.197 0.910 Gamma 0.122 0.357 0.884 G-Logistic 0.159 0.642 0.843 
Dameghan GEV 0.074 0.049 0.943 Ln-Normal 0.098 0.068 0.901 GP 0.102 0.078 0.871 
Triangular 0.083 0.051 0.932 Log10-Normal 0.098 0.069 0.889 Uniform 0.107 0.079 0.863 
Normal 0.092 0.053 0.914 G-Logistic 0.099 0.073 0.881 Exponential 0.362 0.091 0.852 
Garmsar GP 0.085 0.166 0.932 Triangular 0.088 0.390 0.891 Ln-Normal 0.123 0.677 0.851 
GEV 0.086 0.304 0.923 G-Logistic 0.093 0.424 0.887 Log10-Normal 0.123 0.721 0.842 
Normal 0.087 0.331 0.910 Uniform 0.115 0.654 0.862 Exponential 0.387 0.852 0.827 
Shahmirzad Exponential 0.298 0.002 Normal 0.301 0.102 Triangular 0.421 0.274 
G-Logistic 0.299 0.103 GEV 0.335 0.197 GP 0.441 0.569 
Meyami Ln-normal 0.137 0.229 0.912 Ln-Normal 0.154 0.327 0.886 4 Parameter Beta 0.222 0.382 0.852 
GEV 0.139 0.254 0.902 Normal 0.176 0.328 0.873 Empirical 0.231 0.420 0.842 
Triangular 0.142 0.314 0.897 Exponential 0.191 0.330 0.861 G-Logistic 0.239 0.543 0.831 
StationsDistributionK–Sχ2R2DistributionK–Sχ2R2DistributionK–Sχ2R2
Semnan GP 0.102 0.007 0.971 Ln-Normal 0.140 0.032 0.934 Normal 0.166 0.042 0.887 
Triangular 0.123 0.008 0.965 Log10-Normal 0.140 0.037 0.921 G-Logistic 0.178 0.055 0.872 
Uniform 0.123 0.009 0.952 GEV 0.144 0.041 0.902 Exponential 0.402 0.177 0.854 
Shahrood GP 0.098 0.091 0.935 Gumbel 0.114 0.206 0.903 Empirical 0.120 0.548 0.874 
GEV 0.104 0.184 0.924 Triangular 0.117 0.247 0.892 Shifted Exponential 0.141 0.551 0.865 
Logistic 0.110 0.197 0.910 Gamma 0.122 0.357 0.884 G-Logistic 0.159 0.642 0.843 
Dameghan GEV 0.074 0.049 0.943 Ln-Normal 0.098 0.068 0.901 GP 0.102 0.078 0.871 
Triangular 0.083 0.051 0.932 Log10-Normal 0.098 0.069 0.889 Uniform 0.107 0.079 0.863 
Normal 0.092 0.053 0.914 G-Logistic 0.099 0.073 0.881 Exponential 0.362 0.091 0.852 
Garmsar GP 0.085 0.166 0.932 Triangular 0.088 0.390 0.891 Ln-Normal 0.123 0.677 0.851 
GEV 0.086 0.304 0.923 G-Logistic 0.093 0.424 0.887 Log10-Normal 0.123 0.721 0.842 
Normal 0.087 0.331 0.910 Uniform 0.115 0.654 0.862 Exponential 0.387 0.852 0.827 
Shahmirzad Exponential 0.298 0.002 Normal 0.301 0.102 Triangular 0.421 0.274 
G-Logistic 0.299 0.103 GEV 0.335 0.197 GP 0.441 0.569 
Meyami Ln-normal 0.137 0.229 0.912 Ln-Normal 0.154 0.327 0.886 4 Parameter Beta 0.222 0.382 0.852 
GEV 0.139 0.254 0.902 Normal 0.176 0.328 0.873 Empirical 0.231 0.420 0.842 
Triangular 0.142 0.314 0.897 Exponential 0.191 0.330 0.861 G-Logistic 0.239 0.543 0.831 
Table 6

Goodness fit test of selected statistical distributions for the ratio of Pmax24h to Pyear in Semnan province

StationDistributionK–Sχ2R2DistributionK–Sχ2R2DistributionK–Sχ2R2
Semnan GEV 0.081 0.055 0.971 Pearson III 0.090 0.105 0.902 Normal 0.129 0.155 0.842 
Ln-Normal 0.082 0.064 0.962 Shifted Gamma 0.090 0.106 0.892 GP 0.130 0173 0.832 
Log10-Normal 0.082 0.075 0.953 Beta 0.095 0.126 0.887 Logistic 0.132 0.250 0.821 
Log-Pearson III 0.083 0.089 0.942 Log-Logistic 0.099 0.127 0.872 Shifted Exponential 0.198 0.256 0.813 
Gumbel 0.084 0.093 0.931 Triangular 0.120 0.141 0.863 Exponential 0.432 0.257 0.802 
Gamma 0.086 0.104 0.923 Uniform 0.125 0.146 0.856 Empirical 0.441 0.475 0.797 
Shahrood Uniform 0.098 0.108 0.972 Triangular 0.114 0.781 0.921 Beta 0.120 0.907 0892 
GEV 0.103 0.164 0.962 Gumbel 0.115 0.798 0.912 Shifted Exponential 0.140 0.957 0.887 
Pearson III 0.104 0.225 0.953 G-Logistic 0.115 0.869 0.903 Normal 0.152 0.976 0.862 
Logistic 0.112 0.486 0.942 Gamma 0.119 0.870 0.892 GP 0.157 0.978 0.852 
Dameghan Triangular 0.084 0.259 0.932 Shifted Gamma 0.097 1.663 0.872 Logistic 0.118 2.832 0.811 
Uniform 0.086 0.301 0.921 Beta 0.097 1.906 0.865 G-Logistic 0.118 2.940 0.809 
GEV 0.093 0.607 0.913 Ln-Normal 0.097 2.292 0.855 Log-Logistic 0.119 2.969 0.798 
Log-Pearson III 0.093 0.809 0.905 Log10-Normal 0.097 2.431 0.846 Gumbel 0.119 3.015 0.788 
GP 0.094 0.909 0.894 Normal 0.098 2.541 0.832 Shifted Exponential 0.204 3.184 0.765 
Pearson III 0.097 1.565 0.888 Gamma 0.101 2.557 0.824 Exponential 0.407 3.384 0.742 
Garmsar GEV 0.081 0.056 0.952 Pearson III 0.090 0.105 0.898 Normal 0.129 0.155 0.831 
Ln-Normal 0.082 0.064 0.942 Shifted Gamma 0.090 0.106 0.888 GP 0.130 0.173 0.822 
Log10-Normal 0.082 0.075 0.932 Beta 0.095 0.126 0.873 Logistic 0.132 0.249 0.817 
Log-Pearson III 0.083 0.089 0.929 Log-Logistic 0.099 0.127 0.865 Shifted Exponential 0.198 0.256 0.809 
Gumbel 0.084 0.093 0.914 Triangular 0.120 0.141 0.855 Exponential 0.432 0.475 0.798 
Gamma 0.086 0.103 0.903 Uniform 0.125 0.146 0.839 Empirical 0.446 0.517 0.778 
Shahmirzad Exponential 0.126 0.003 0.954 G-Logistic 0.147 0.367 0.892 GP 0.157 0.417 0.821 
Normal 0.130 0.218 0.943 Logistic 0.147 0.368 0.886 Beta 0.167 0.519 0.810 
Pearson III 0.131 0.299 0.921 Gumbel 0.148 0.375 0.852 Gamma 0.167 0.583 0.802 
Triangular 0.131 0.330 0.911 Uniform 0.156 0.409 0.843 GEV 0.167 0.591 0.792 
Meyami GP 0.140 0.036 0.942 Beta 0.190 0.211 0.882 Uniform 0.206 0.805 0.821 
Shifted Exponential 0.142 0.044 0.932 Triangular 0.190 0.234 0.872 Log-Logistic 0.222 0.829 0.814 
Log-Pearson III 0.165 0.073 0.929 GEV 0.192 0.255 0.862 Normal 0.235 0.842 0.809 
Pearson III 0.166 0.104 0.912 Gumbel 0.195 0.267 0.856 Logistic 0.255 0.867 0.792 
Shifted Gamma 0.166 0.127 0.902 Ln-Normal 0.204 0.275 0.843 Exponential 0.392 0.918 0.789 
Gamma 0.188 0.203 0.892 Log10-Normal 0.204 0.447 0.832 Empirical 0.395 0.955 0.772 
StationDistributionK–Sχ2R2DistributionK–Sχ2R2DistributionK–Sχ2R2
Semnan GEV 0.081 0.055 0.971 Pearson III 0.090 0.105 0.902 Normal 0.129 0.155 0.842 
Ln-Normal 0.082 0.064 0.962 Shifted Gamma 0.090 0.106 0.892 GP 0.130 0173 0.832 
Log10-Normal 0.082 0.075 0.953 Beta 0.095 0.126 0.887 Logistic 0.132 0.250 0.821 
Log-Pearson III 0.083 0.089 0.942 Log-Logistic 0.099 0.127 0.872 Shifted Exponential 0.198 0.256 0.813 
Gumbel 0.084 0.093 0.931 Triangular 0.120 0.141 0.863 Exponential 0.432 0.257 0.802 
Gamma 0.086 0.104 0.923 Uniform 0.125 0.146 0.856 Empirical 0.441 0.475 0.797 
Shahrood Uniform 0.098 0.108 0.972 Triangular 0.114 0.781 0.921 Beta 0.120 0.907 0892 
GEV 0.103 0.164 0.962 Gumbel 0.115 0.798 0.912 Shifted Exponential 0.140 0.957 0.887 
Pearson III 0.104 0.225 0.953 G-Logistic 0.115 0.869 0.903 Normal 0.152 0.976 0.862 
Logistic 0.112 0.486 0.942 Gamma 0.119 0.870 0.892 GP 0.157 0.978 0.852 
Dameghan Triangular 0.084 0.259 0.932 Shifted Gamma 0.097 1.663 0.872 Logistic 0.118 2.832 0.811 
Uniform 0.086 0.301 0.921 Beta 0.097 1.906 0.865 G-Logistic 0.118 2.940 0.809 
GEV 0.093 0.607 0.913 Ln-Normal 0.097 2.292 0.855 Log-Logistic 0.119 2.969 0.798 
Log-Pearson III 0.093 0.809 0.905 Log10-Normal 0.097 2.431 0.846 Gumbel 0.119 3.015 0.788 
GP 0.094 0.909 0.894 Normal 0.098 2.541 0.832 Shifted Exponential 0.204 3.184 0.765 
Pearson III 0.097 1.565 0.888 Gamma 0.101 2.557 0.824 Exponential 0.407 3.384 0.742 
Garmsar GEV 0.081 0.056 0.952 Pearson III 0.090 0.105 0.898 Normal 0.129 0.155 0.831 
Ln-Normal 0.082 0.064 0.942 Shifted Gamma 0.090 0.106 0.888 GP 0.130 0.173 0.822 
Log10-Normal 0.082 0.075 0.932 Beta 0.095 0.126 0.873 Logistic 0.132 0.249 0.817 
Log-Pearson III 0.083 0.089 0.929 Log-Logistic 0.099 0.127 0.865 Shifted Exponential 0.198 0.256 0.809 
Gumbel 0.084 0.093 0.914 Triangular 0.120 0.141 0.855 Exponential 0.432 0.475 0.798 
Gamma 0.086 0.103 0.903 Uniform 0.125 0.146 0.839 Empirical 0.446 0.517 0.778 
Shahmirzad Exponential 0.126 0.003 0.954 G-Logistic 0.147 0.367 0.892 GP 0.157 0.417 0.821 
Normal 0.130 0.218 0.943 Logistic 0.147 0.368 0.886 Beta 0.167 0.519 0.810 
Pearson III 0.131 0.299 0.921 Gumbel 0.148 0.375 0.852 Gamma 0.167 0.583 0.802 
Triangular 0.131 0.330 0.911 Uniform 0.156 0.409 0.843 GEV 0.167 0.591 0.792 
Meyami GP 0.140 0.036 0.942 Beta 0.190 0.211 0.882 Uniform 0.206 0.805 0.821 
Shifted Exponential 0.142 0.044 0.932 Triangular 0.190 0.234 0.872 Log-Logistic 0.222 0.829 0.814 
Log-Pearson III 0.165 0.073 0.929 GEV 0.192 0.255 0.862 Normal 0.235 0.842 0.809 
Pearson III 0.166 0.104 0.912 Gumbel 0.195 0.267 0.856 Logistic 0.255 0.867 0.792 
Shifted Gamma 0.166 0.127 0.902 Ln-Normal 0.204 0.275 0.843 Exponential 0.392 0.918 0.789 
Gamma 0.188 0.203 0.892 Log10-Normal 0.204 0.447 0.832 Empirical 0.395 0.955 0.772 

According to Figure 3, GP distribution was the best distribution for Pyear in Semnan, Damghan, Garmsar, and Meyami stations. Gumbel distribution and Exponential distribution are the top distributions of Shahroud and Shahmirzad stations, respectively. As can be seen in Figure 3, the experimental and theoretical values are in good agreement.
Figure 3

Predictions with selected Pyear distributions of stations: (a) Semnan, (b) Shahroud, (c) Damghan, (d) Garmsar, (e) Shahmirzad, and (f) Meyami.

Figure 3

Predictions with selected Pyear distributions of stations: (a) Semnan, (b) Shahroud, (c) Damghan, (d) Garmsar, (e) Shahmirzad, and (f) Meyami.

Close modal
According to Figure 4, for Pmax24h in Semnan, Shahroud, and Garmsar stations, GP distribution was the superior distribution. GEV, Normal and Exponential distributions are the top statistical distributions of Damghan, Meyami, and Shahmirzad stations, respectively. As can be seen in Figure 4, the experimental and theoretical values are in good agreement.
Figure 4

Prediction with selected distributions of Pmax24h at stations: (a) Semnan, (b) Shahroud, (c) Damghan, (d) Garmsar, (e) Shahmirzad, and (f) Meyami.

Figure 4

Prediction with selected distributions of Pmax24h at stations: (a) Semnan, (b) Shahroud, (c) Damghan, (d) Garmsar, (e) Shahmirzad, and (f) Meyami.

Close modal
According to Figure 5, for the Pmax24h to Pyear in Semnan, Garmsar, and Shahmirzad stations, GEV distribution was superior. GP, normal, and triangular distributions are the top statistical distributions of Meyami, Shahroud, and Damghan stations, respectively. As can be seen in Figure 5, the experimental and theoretical values are in good agreement.
Figure 5

Prediction with selected distributions of the ratio of Pmax24h to Pyear of stations: (a) Semnan, (b) Shahroud, (c) Damghan, (d) Garmsar, (e) Shahmirzad, and (f) Meyami.

Figure 5

Prediction with selected distributions of the ratio of Pmax24h to Pyear of stations: (a) Semnan, (b) Shahroud, (c) Damghan, (d) Garmsar, (e) Shahmirzad, and (f) Meyami.

Close modal

Spatial distribution

To evaluate the spatial distribution methods, primarily, estimated data were calculated for each of the observed data using the cross-evaluation method.

The data of each station were used according to the appropriately selected time distribution. Then, using the Kriging method, the spatial distribution of Pyear in the study area in the return periods of 10, 25, 50, 100, and 200 years was performed and is shown in Figure 6. According to Figure 6, the maximum annual precipitation increases with approaching 53.35 east longitude and 35.77 north latitude and decreases as it moves away from it, because the highest altitude is related to the mentioned latitude and longitude (Shahmirzad station), and the lowest altitude is associated with the southeast of the basin. Also, with the increase of the return periods from 10 to 200 years, Pyear increases from 420 to 1,040 mm per year.
Figure 6

Spatial distribution of Pyear (in mm) in the study area with the following return periods: (a) 10 years, (b) 25 years, (c) 50 years, (d) 100 years, (e) 200 years, and longitude and latitude in degrees.

Figure 6

Spatial distribution of Pyear (in mm) in the study area with the following return periods: (a) 10 years, (b) 25 years, (c) 50 years, (d) 100 years, (e) 200 years, and longitude and latitude in degrees.

Close modal
Figure 7 shows the Pmax24h estimated under different return periods and its spatial distribution. According to Figure 7, by moving toward the north (to Shahmirzad position), precipitation increases for a maximum of 24 h. Also, by moving toward the south and southeast, 24-h rainfall decreases in all the return periods studied. In addition, with an increasing return period from 10 to 200 years, the Pmax24h increases from about 50 to 150 mm per day.
Figure 7

Spatial distribution of maximum 24-h rainfall (in mm) in the study area with the following return periods: (a) 10 years, (b) 25 years, (c) 50 years, (d) 100 years, (e) 200 years, and longitude and latitude in degrees.

Figure 7

Spatial distribution of maximum 24-h rainfall (in mm) in the study area with the following return periods: (a) 10 years, (b) 25 years, (c) 50 years, (d) 100 years, (e) 200 years, and longitude and latitude in degrees.

Close modal

In other words, in all return periods of 10, 25, 50, 100 and 200, the amount of annual rainfall and 2-h rainfall decreases from the north and northeast of Semnan province to the southeast. The amount of error of each method is shown using evaluation criteria based on Table 7.

Table 7

Evaluation results of different interpolation methods

Pyear
Pmax24h
InterpolationTrR2RMSE(mm)MAE(mm)R2RMSE(mm)MAE(mm)
Kriging 10 0.64 266.36 212.23 0.31 39.04 38.14 
IDW 10 0.35 268.34 258.19 0.32 39.24 38.35 
RBF 10 0.35 276.63 264.34 0.33 40.20 39.04 
Kriging 25 0.64 344.96 265.84 0.70 52.15 41.65 
IDW 25 0.62 354.23 272.62 0.57 52.63 41.97 
RBF 25 0.66 384.19 299.19 0.70 54.21 42.81 
Kriging 50 0.36 402.83 370.65 0.72 61.81 48.60 
IDW 50 0.39 408.08 373.86 0.57 62.63 49.15 
RBF 50 0.66 455.40 349.06 0.71 51.16 50.05 
Kriging 100 0.67 501.76 385.32 0.72 71.15 55.18 
IDW 100 0.59 509.00 388.27 0.57 72.36 55.99 
RBF 100 0.65 532.98 402.48 0.70 74.71 56.85 
Kriging 200 0.67 568.48 432.21 0.72 81.42 62.25 
IDW 200 0.59 577.59 435.83 0.57 83.06 63.37 
RBF 200 0.65 606.09 452.51 0.70 85.86 64.17 
Pyear
Pmax24h
InterpolationTrR2RMSE(mm)MAE(mm)R2RMSE(mm)MAE(mm)
Kriging 10 0.64 266.36 212.23 0.31 39.04 38.14 
IDW 10 0.35 268.34 258.19 0.32 39.24 38.35 
RBF 10 0.35 276.63 264.34 0.33 40.20 39.04 
Kriging 25 0.64 344.96 265.84 0.70 52.15 41.65 
IDW 25 0.62 354.23 272.62 0.57 52.63 41.97 
RBF 25 0.66 384.19 299.19 0.70 54.21 42.81 
Kriging 50 0.36 402.83 370.65 0.72 61.81 48.60 
IDW 50 0.39 408.08 373.86 0.57 62.63 49.15 
RBF 50 0.66 455.40 349.06 0.71 51.16 50.05 
Kriging 100 0.67 501.76 385.32 0.72 71.15 55.18 
IDW 100 0.59 509.00 388.27 0.57 72.36 55.99 
RBF 100 0.65 532.98 402.48 0.70 74.71 56.85 
Kriging 200 0.67 568.48 432.21 0.72 81.42 62.25 
IDW 200 0.59 577.59 435.83 0.57 83.06 63.37 
RBF 200 0.65 606.09 452.51 0.70 85.86 64.17 

Estimation of maximum 24-h rainfall using annual rainfall

This section compares the relationship between Pyear and Pmax24h. Figure 8 shows a graph of the Pmax24h distribution relative to the Pyear. According to Figure 8, the highest correlation coefficient between Pyear and Pmax24h is associated with the return period of 100 years. The lowest is related to the return period of 200 years. Therefore, the correlation between Pyear and Pmax24h in all return periods is high. Also, after a return period of 50 years, this correlation decreases slightly, which can be due to the limited Pmax24h.
Figure 8

Correlation between Pyear and Pmax24h (mm) for a (a) 10-year return period, (b) 25-year return period, (c) 50-year return period, (d) 100-year return period, and (e) 200-year return period.

Figure 8

Correlation between Pyear and Pmax24h (mm) for a (a) 10-year return period, (b) 25-year return period, (c) 50-year return period, (d) 100-year return period, and (e) 200-year return period.

Close modal
Figure 9 shows the relationship between Pyear and Pmax24h for different return periods at the studied stations. With an increasing return period in all stations, Pyear and Pmax24h have an upward trend. The trendline slope in Pyear and Pmax24h for Shahmirzad station is steeper than other stations. But this slope for Semnan station is almost zero. With the increase of the Pyear return period and the Pmax24h, there is no significant change. Shahmirzad's climate is semi-arid based on the De Martonne method, while the rest of the studied stations have dry climatic conditions. The reason for the difference in slope can be in this regard.
Figure 9

Relationship between precipitation and different return periods for the six studied stations: (a) Pmax24h and (b) Pyear.

Figure 9

Relationship between precipitation and different return periods for the six studied stations: (a) Pmax24h and (b) Pyear.

Close modal
The Taylor diagram is drawn to investigate and analyze the values of standard deviation, correlation coefficient and root mean square error between Pyear data and Pmax24h for 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, and 200-year return periods (Figure 10). In the Taylor diagram, the longitudinal distance from the origin of the coordinates represents the correlation coefficient, and the segmental lines represent the square root values of the mean squares of the error. As the circle segment increases, the value of this parameter increases. It can be said that each point of the Taylor diagram represents the standard deviation, the correlation coefficient, and the mean squares of the square error at the same time (Taylor 2001).
Figure 10

Taylor diagram for a 10-year return period, 25-year return period, 50-year return period, 100-year return period, and 200-year return period.

Figure 10

Taylor diagram for a 10-year return period, 25-year return period, 50-year return period, 100-year return period, and 200-year return period.

Close modal

Proposing a model for forecasting maximum 24-h rainfall

Using the GA for estimating the Pmax24h led to the general relationship resulted in Equation (23). This relationship is defined based on the parameters of z and Pyear and Tr. In Equation (24), the coefficients of the parameters are expressed using the genetic method. Figure 11 shows the data predicted by GA in terms of measurement data. The horizontal axis shows the observed 24-h maximum precipitation data (in millimeters), and the vertical axis shows the simulated maximum 24-h precipitation data (in millimeters). The lower the data scatter around the best fit line, the greater the correlation and the less error. As can be seen, the correlation between the measured and simulated precipitation data is 0.98:
(23)
(24)
where a, b, c, d, e, f, and g are constant coefficients for Equation (23). z is the height of stations above the sea level, Tr is the return period, Pyear is the anuual rainfall, and Pmax24h is the maximum 24-h rainfall.
Figure 11

Pmax24h values simulated with the GA model in terms of measured values.

Figure 11

Pmax24h values simulated with the GA model in terms of measured values.

Close modal

The Kavir plain is located in the south of the Semnan province and there is no city, and therefore, no synoptic station and almost all cities of this province are located in the northern half of the province. For instance, Semnan city, which is the seat of the Semnan province, and Garmsar city is closer to the southern desert of the province and have an arid and warm climate. However, Shahmirzad city has higher rainfall than other regions of the province due to locating on the Alborz mountain range heights. Shahmirzad is only 25 km away from Semnan city, but they are different climate conditions. In this study, stations were studied whose data were complete. Also, in this study, we wanted to examine only changes in latitude and longitude.

Despite the many advantages, the existing problems in fitting the models are among the disadvantages of Kriging methods (Teymourzade et al. 2019). Although the IDW method is quick and easy, it does not provide information on dependency or estimation of spatial uncertainty (Dingman 2002).

The climatic conditions of Iran have a great variety that has been created due to changes in latitude and altitude. Semnan province has a variety of climatic conditions in different stations, and these conditions have prevailed on the stations due to the locations of the stations. Statistical analyses of Pyear and Pmax24h and the ratio of Pmax24h to Pyear were performed in six stations in Semnan, Shahroud, Damghan, Garmsar, Shahmirzad, and Meyami. Based on the Pyear analysis, the Shahmirzad station has the highest annual average and the lowest average Pyear in the Damghan station. Then, spatial interpolation using Kriging and IDW methods and 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, and 200-year return periods were studied. In general, both Kriging and IDW methods had good performance in spatial distributions. For all return periods, the Pyear and Pmax24h decreases to the southeast of Semnan province. At the same time, the closer we get to the north of the region, especially to the Shahmirzad station, the Pyear increases to a Pmax24h.

There is a good relationship between Pyear and Pmax24h. The values of R2 coefficient in the 10-, 25-, 50-, 100-, and 200-year return periods were 0.988, 0.992, 0.988, 0.983 and 0.98, respectively. In the temporal analysis, the GP distribution with about 58% in the studied stations was the selected distribution in the analysis of Pyear and Pmax24h. Half of the regions followed the GEV distribution for the ratio of a Pmax24h to Pyear. Based on the results obtained in the present study, it is suggested that researchers can use statistical methods as an optimal approach for locating other meteorological stations. One of the limitations of this study is the small number of stations that have complete data. New methods can also be used to predict time with different return periods.

This article is not funded by any scientific institution.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Agung Setianto
A. S.
&
Tamia Triandini
T. T.
2013
Comparison of Kriging and inverse distance weighted (IDW) interpolation methods in lineament extraction and analysis
.
Journal of Southeast Asian Applied Geology
5
(
1
),
21
29
.
Arifin
S.
,
Arifin
R.
,
Pitts
D.
,
Rahman
M.
,
Nowreen
S.
,
Madey
G.
&
Collins
F.
2015
Landscape epidemiology modeling using an agent-based model and a geographic information system
.
Land
4
(
2
),
378
412
.
Asadzadeh
F.
,
Ehsan Malahat
E.
&
Shakiba
S.
2017
Prediction of the spatial distribution pattern of precipitation using geostatistical methods in Urmia region
.
Scientific Journal Management System
11
(
22
),
87
95
.
Azad
A.
,
Manoochehri
M.
,
Kashi
H.
,
Farzin
S.
,
Karami
H.
,
Nourani
V.
&
Shiri
J.
2019
Comparative evaluation of intelligent algorithms to improve adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system performance in precipitation modelling
.
Journal of Hydrology
571
,
214
224
.
Bayat
B.
,
Hosseini
K.
,
Nasseri
M.
&
Karami
H.
2019
Challenge of rainfall network design considering spatial versus spatiotemporal variations
.
Journal of Hydrology
574
,
990
1002
.
Bhavyashree
S.
&
Bhattacharyya
B.
2018
Fitting probability distributions for rainfall analysis of Karnataka, India
.
International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences
7
(
03
),
1498
1506
.
Bolandakhtar
M. K.
&
Golian
S.
2019
Determining the best combination of MODIS data as input to ANN models for simulation of rainfall
.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
138
,
1323
1332
.
Brunner
G. W.
&
Fleming
M. J.
2010
HEC-SSP Statistical software package. US Army Corps Eng. Inst. Water Resour. Hydrol. Eng. Cent. HEC
.
Bury
K.
1999
Statistical Distributions in Engineering
.
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
Cheng
K.
,
Lin
Y.
&
Liou
J.
2008
Rain-gauge network evaluation and augmentation using geostatistics
.
Hydrological Processes: An International Journal
22
(
14
),
2554
2564
.
Chutsagulprom
N.
,
Chaisee
K.
,
Wongsaijai
B.
,
Inkeaw
P.
&
Oonariya
C.
2022
Spatial interpolation methods for estimating monthly rainfall distribution in Thailand
.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
148
(
1–2
),
317
328
.
Coronado-Hernández
Ó. E.
,
Merlano-Sabalza
E.
,
Díaz-Vergara
Z.
&
Coronado-Hernández
J. R.
2020
Selection of hydrological probability distributions for extreme rainfall events in the regions of Colombia
.
Water
12
(
5
),
1397
.
Dadrasajirlou
Y.
,
Ghazvinian
H.
,
Heddam
S.
&
Ganji
M.
2022
Reference evapotranspiration estimation using ANN, LSSVM, and M5 tree models (Case study of Babolsar and Ramsar Regions, Iran)
.
Journal of Soft Computing in Civil Engineering
6
(
3
),
103
121
.
Dadrasajirlou
Y.
,
Karami
H.
&
Mirjalili
S.
2023
Using AHP-PROMOTHEE for selection of best low-impact development designs for urban flood mitigation
.
Water Resources Management
37
(
1
),
375
402
.
Dehghanipour
M. H.
,
Karami
H.
,
Ghazvinian
H.
,
Kalantari
Z.
&
Dehghanipour
A. H.
2021
Two comprehensive and practical methods for simulating pan evaporation under different climatic conditions in Iran
.
Water
13
(
20
),
2814
.
Dingman
S. L.
2002
Physical Hydrology Waveland Press. Long Grove, Illinois
.
Eftekhari
M.
,
Eslaminezhad
S. A.
,
Akbari
M.
,
DadrasAjirlou
Y.
&
Haji Elyasi
A.
2021
Assessment of the potential of groundwater quality indicators by geostatistical methods in Semi-arid Regions
.
Journal of Chinese Soil and Water Conservation
52
(
3
),
158
167
.
Ehteram
M.
,
Mousavi
S. F.
,
Karami
H.
,
Farzin
S.
,
Singh
V. P.
,
Chau
K.
&
El-Shafie
A.
2018
Reservoir operation based on evolutionary algorithms and multi-criteria decision-making under climate change and uncertainty
.
Journal of Hydroinformatics
20
(
2
),
332
355
.
Feng
X.
,
Porporato
A.
&
Rodriguez-Iturbe
I.
2013
Changes in rainfall seasonality in the tropics
.
Nature Climate Change
3
(
9
),
811
815
.
Flannigan
M. D.
,
Wotton
B. M.
,
Marshall
G. A.
,
de Groot
W. J.
,
Johnston
J.
,
Jurko
N.
&
Cantin
A. S.
2016
Fuel moisture sensitivity to temperature and precipitation: Climate change implications
.
Climatic Change
134
(
1–2
),
59
71
.
Forbes
C.
,
Evans
M.
,
Hastings
N.
&
Peacock
B.
2011
Statistical Distributions
.
John Wiley & Sons
,
Canada
.
Gado
T. A.
,
Salama
A. M.
&
Zeidan
B. A.
2021
Selection of the best probability models for daily annual maximum rainfalls in Egypt
.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
144
(
3–4
),
1267
1284
. https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00704-021-03594-0.
Ghazvinian
H.
&
Karami
H.
2023
Effect of rainfall intensity and slope at the beginning of sandy loam soil runoff using rain simulator (Case study: Semnan City)
.
JSTNAR
26
(
4
),
319
334
.
Ghazvinian
H.
,
Mousavi
S.-F.
,
Karami
H.
,
Farzin
S.
,
Ehteram
M.
,
Hossain
M. S.
,
Fai
C. M.
,
Hashim
H. B.
,
Singh
V. P.
,
Ros
F. C.
,
Ahmed
A. N.
,
Afan
H. A.
,
Lai
S. H.
&
El-Shafie
A.
2019
Integrated support vector regression and an improved particle swarm optimization-based model for solar radiation prediction (Y. Li, ed.)
.
PLOS ONE
14
(
5
),
e0217634
.
Ghazvinian
H.
,
Karami
H.
,
Farzin
S.
&
Mousavi
S. F.
2020a
Effect of MDF-cover for water reservoir evaporation reduction, experimental, and soft computing approaches
.
Journal of Soft Computing in Civil Engineering
4
(
1
),
98
110
.
Ghazvinian
H.
,
Karami
H.
,
Farzin
S.
&
Mousavi
S. F.
2020b
Experimental study of evaporation reduction using polystyrene coating, wood and Wax and its estimation by intelligent algorithms
.
Irrigation and Water Engineering
11
(
2
),
147
165
.
Ghazvinian
H.
,
Farzin
S.
,
Karami
H.
&
Mousavi
S. F.
2020c
Investigating the effect of using polystyrene sheets on evaporation reduction from water-storage reservoirs in Arid and Semiarid Regions (Case study: Semnan city)
.
Journal of Water and Sustainable Development
7
(
2
),
45
52
. https://jwsd.um.ac.ir/article_32593.html.
Ghazvinian
H.
,
Bahrami
H.
,
Ghazvinian
H.
&
Heddam
S.
2020d
Simulation of monthly precipitation in Semnan City using ANN artificial intelligence model
.
Journal of Soft Computing in Civil Engineering
4
(
4
),
36
46
.
Goldberg
D. E.
1989
Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization & Machine Learning
,
Addison-Wesley
,
Reading, Mass
, p.
126
.
Goovaerts
P.
1997
Geostatistics for Natural Resources Evaluation
.
Oxford University Press on Demand
,
Oxford, UK
.
Gräler
B.
,
van den Berg
M. J.
,
Vandenberghe
S.
,
Petroselli
A.
,
Grimaldi
S.
,
De Baets
B.
&
Verhoest
N. E. C.
2013
Multivariate return periods in hydrology: A critical and practical review focusing on synthetic design hydrograph estimation
.
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
17
(
4
),
1281
1296
.
Haddeland
I.
,
Heinke
J.
,
Biemans
H.
,
Eisner
S.
,
Flörke
M.
,
Hanasaki
N.
,
Konzmann
M.
,
Ludwig
F.
,
Masaki
Y.
&
Schewe
J.
2014
Global water resources affected by human interventions and climate change
.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
111
(
9
),
3251
3256
.
Hancock
P. A.
&
Hutchinson
M. F.
2002
An iterative procedure for calculating minimum generalised cross validation smoothing splines
.
ANZIAM Journal
44
,
C290
C312
.
Hardy
R. L.
1971
Multiquadric equations of topography and other irregular surfaces
.
Journal of Geophysical Research
76
(
8
),
1905
1915
.
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/JB076i008p01905
.
Harris
J.
,
Brunner
G.
&
Faber
B
.
2008
‘Statistical Software Package’ in World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2008. Reston, VA, American Society of Civil Engineers, 1–10. http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/40976%28316%29568
.
Holdridge
L. R.
1947
Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data
.
Science
105
(
2727
),
367
368
.
https://www.sciencemag.org/lookup/doi/10.1126/science.105.2727.367
.
Hu
Z.
,
Karami
H.
,
Rezaei
A.
,
DadrasAjirlou
Y.
,
Piran
M. J.
,
Band
S. S.
,
Chau
K.-W.
&
Mosavi
A.
2021
Using soft computing and machine learning algorithms to predict the discharge coefficient of curved labyrinth overflows
.
Engineering Applications of Computational Fluid Mechanics
15
(
1
),
1002
1015
.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/19942060.2021.1934546
.
Hurst
H. E.
1951
Long-term storage capacity of reservoirs
.
Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers
116
(
1
),
770
799
.
Husak
G. J.
,
Michaelsen
J.
&
Funk
C.
2007
Use of the gamma distribution to represent monthly rainfall in Africa for drought monitoring applications
.
International Journal of Climatology
27
(
7
),
935
944
.
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/joc.1441
.
Ikechukwu
M. N.
,
Ebinne
E.
,
Idorenyin
U.
&
Raphael
N. I.
2017
Accuracy assessment and comparative analysis of IDW, spline and Kriging in spatial interpolation of landform (Topography): An experimental study
.
Journal of Geographic Information System
9
(
3
),
354
371
.
Iqbal
Z.
,
Shahid
S.
,
Ahmed
K.
,
Ismail
T.
&
Nawaz
N.
2019
Spatial distribution of the trends in precipitation and precipitation extremes in the sub-Himalayan region of Pakistan
.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
137
(
3–4
),
2755
2769
.
Jahan
F.
,
Sinha
N. C.
,
Mahfuzur
R.
,
Morshadur
R.
,
Mondal
M. S. H.
&
Islam
M. A.
2019
Comparison of missing value estimation techniques in rainfall data of Bangladesh
.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
136
(
3–4
),
1115
1131
.
Jeffrey
S. J.
,
Carter
J. O.
,
Moodie
K. B.
&
Beswick
A. R.
2001
Using spatial interpolation to construct a comprehensive archive of Australian climate data
.
Environmental Modelling & Software
16
(
4
),
309
330
.
Karami
H.
&
Ghazvinian
H.
2022
A practical and economic assessment regarding the effect of various physical covers on reducing evaporation from water reservoirs in Arid and Semi-Arid Regions (Experimental study)
.
Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research ISNN
53
(
6
),
1297
1313
.
Karami
H.
,
Ghazvinian
H.
,
Dehghanipour
M.
&
Ferdosian
M.
2021
Investigating the performance of neural network based group method of data handling to Pan's daily evaporation estimation (Case study: Garmsar City)
.
Journal of Soft Computing in Civil Engineering
1
18
.
Karami
H.
,
Dadrasajirlou
Y.
,
Band
S.
,
Mosavi
S.
,
Moslehpour
A.
,
and Chau
M.
&
W
K.
2022
A novel approach for estimation of sediment load in Dam reservoir with hybrid intelligent algorithms
.
Frontiers in Environmental Science
10
,
821079
.
DOI: 10.3389/fenvs.2022.821079
.
Karamouz
M.
,
Nazif
S.
&
Falahi
M.
2012
Hydrology and Hydroclimatology: Principles and Applications, 6000 Broken Sound Parkway NW, Suite 300
.
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL, USA
.
Karian
Z. A.
&
Dudewicz
E. J.
2000
Fitting Statistical Distributions: The Generalized Lambda Distribution and Generalized Bootstrap Methods
.
CRC Press
,
New York, USA
.
Karimpour Reyhan
M.
,
Esmaeilpour
Y.
,
Malekian
A.
,
Mashhadi
N.
&
Kamali
N.
2009
Spatio-temporal analysis of drought vulnerability using the standardized precipitation index (Case study: Semnan Province, Iran)
.
Desert
14
(
2
),
133
140
.
Keckler
D.
1994
Surfer for Windows. User's Guide. Contouring and 3D Surface Mapping
, Vol.
23
.
Golden Software. Inc
,
Colorado
,
USA
.
Chapters
.
Khan
N.
,
Pour
S. H.
,
Shahid
S.
,
Ismail
T.
,
Ahmed
K.
,
Chung
E. S.
,
Nawaz
N.
&
Wang
X.
2019
Spatial distribution of secular trends in rainfall indices of Peninsular Malaysia in the presence of long-term persistence
.
Meteorological Applications
26
(
4
),
655
670
.
Krajewski
W. F.
&
Smith
J. A.
2002
Radar hydrology: Rainfall estimation
.
Advances in Water Resources
25
(
8–12
),
1387
1394
.
Lemus-Canovas
M.
,
Ninyerola
M.
,
Lopez-Bustins
J. A.
,
Manguan
S.
&
Garcia-Sellés
C.
2019
A mixed application of an objective synoptic classification and spatial regression models for deriving winter precipitation regimes in the Eastern Pyrenees
.
International Journal of Climatology
39
(
4
),
2244
2259
.
Li
Y.
,
Wang
Q. J.
,
He
H.
,
Wu
Z.
&
Lu
G.
2020
A method to extend temporal coverage of high quality precipitation datasets by calibrating reanalysis estimates
.
Journal of Hydrology
581
,
124355
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124355
.
Massey
F. J.
Jr.
1951
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit
.
Journal of the American Statistical Association
46
(
253
),
68
78
.
Milly
P. C. D.
,
Dunne
K. A.
&
Vecchia
A. V.
2005
Global pattern of trends in streamflow and water availability in a changing climate
.
Nature
438
(
7066
),
347
350
.
Mishra
A. K.
,
Özger
M.
&
Singh
V. P.
2011
Association between uncertainties in meteorological variables and water-resources planning for the state of Texas
.
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
16
(
12
),
984
999
.
Noor
I. M. M.
,
Prasetyowati
S. S.
&
Sibaroni
Y.
2022
Prediction Map of rainfall classification using random forest and Inverse Distance Weighted (IDW). Building of informatics
.
Technology and Science (BITS
4
(
2
),
723
731
.
Oki
T.
&
Kanae
S.
2006
Global hydrological cycles and world water resources
.
Science
313
(
5790
),
1068
1072
.
Rajah
K.
,
O'Leary
T.
,
Turner
A.
,
Petrakis
G.
,
Leonard
M.
&
Westra
S.
2014
Changes to the temporal distribution of daily precipitation
.
Geophysical Research Letters
41
(
24
),
8887
8894
.
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/2014GL062156
.
Rao
A. R.
&
Hamed
K. H.
2000
The Logistic Distribution. Flood Frequency Analysis
.
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, Florida
,
USA
, pp.
291
321
.
Raziei
T.
2021
Performance evaluation of different probability distribution functions for computing standardized precipitation index over diverse climates of Iran
.
International Journal of Climatology
41
(
5
),
3352
3373
.
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.7023
.
Root
K.
&
Papakos
T. H.
2010
Hydrologic Analysis of Flash Floods in Sana'a, Yemen’ in Watershed Management 2010. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp. 1248–1259. http://ascelibrary.org/doi/10.1061/41143%28394%29112
.
Schewe
J.
,
Heinke
J.
,
Gerten
D.
,
Haddeland
I.
,
Arnell
N. W.
,
Clark
D. B.
,
Dankers
R.
,
Eisner
S.
,
Fekete
B. M.
&
Colón-González
F. J.
2014
Multimodel assessment of water scarcity under climate change
.
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
111
(
9
),
3245
3250
.
Simolo
C.
,
Brunetti
M.
,
Maugeri
M.
&
Nanni
T.
2010
Improving estimation of missing values in daily precipitation series by a probability density function-preserving approach
.
International Journal of Climatology
30
(
10
),
1564
1576
.
Solgi
A.
,
Zarei
H.
,
Pourhaghi
A.
&
Khodabakhshi
H.
2016
Forecasting monthly precipitation using a hybrid model of wavelet artificial neural network and comparison with artificial neural network
.
Irrigation and Water Engineering
6
(
3
),
18
33
.
St-Hilaire
A.
,
Ouarda
T. B. M. J.
,
Lachance
M.
,
Bobée
B.
,
Gaudet
J.
&
Gignac
C.
2003
Assessment of the impact of meteorological network density on the estimation of basin precipitation and runoff: A case study
.
Hydrological Processes
17
(
18
),
3561
3580
.
Taylor
K. E.
2001
Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram
.
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
106
(
D7
),
7183
7192
.
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/2000JD900719
.
Teymourzade
S.
,
Mirzaei
R.
&
Mohammadi
M.
2019
Application of empirical Bayesian Kriging to map soil contamination by heavy metals (Case study: Esfarayen city)
.
Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
21
(
7
),
89
105
. https://jest.srbiau.ac.ir/article_13446.html.
Thornthwaite
C. W.
1948
An approach toward a rational classification of climate
.
Geographical Review
38
(
1
),
55
94
.
Vaziri
H.
,
Karami
H.
,
Mousavi
S.-F.
&
Hadiani
M.
2018
Analysis of hydrological drought characteristics using copula function approach
.
Paddy and Water Environment
16
(
1
),
153
161
.
Vélez
A.
,
Martin-Vide
J.
,
Royé
D.
&
Santaella
O.
2019
Spatial analysis of daily precipitation concentration in Puerto Rico
.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
136
(
3–4
),
1347
1355
.
Volpi
E.
&
Fiori
A.
2014
Hydraulic structures subject to bivariate hydrological loads: Return period, design, and risk assessment
.
Water Resources Research
50
(
2
),
885
897
.
http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/2013WR014214
.
Wienhöfer
J.
,
Alcamo
L.
,
Bondy
J.
&
Zehe
E.
2023
Statistical-topographical mapping of rainfall over mountainous terrain with the β-IDW approach
. In
Copernicus Meetings
.
Wilks
D. S.
1995
Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences, 1995. Library of Cataloging-in-Publication
.
Academic Press
,
San Diego, CA
, p.
465
.
Zabihi
A.
,
Solaimani
K.
,
Shabani
M.
&
Abravsh
S.
2012
An investigation of annual rainfall spatial distribution using geostatistical methods (A case study: Qom Province)
.
Physical Geography Research Quarterly
43
(
78
),
102
112
.
Zhang
Y.
&
Li
Z.
2020
Uncertainty analysis of standardized precipitation index due to the effects of probability distributions and parameter errors
.
Frontiers in Earth Science
8
.
Zhang
L.
,
Chang
H.
&
Xu
R.
2012
Equal-width partitioning roulette wheel selection in genetic algorithm
. In:
2012 Conference on Technologies and Applications of Artificial Intelligence
.
IEEE
, pp.
62
67
.
Zhang
H.
,
Loáiciga
H. A.
,
Ren
F.
,
Du
Q.
&
Ha
D.
2020
Semi-empirical prediction method for monthly precipitation prediction based on environmental factors and comparison with stochastic and machine learning models
.
Hydrological Sciences Journal
1
15
.
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02626667.2020.1784901
.
Zhao
R.
,
Wang
H.
,
Zhan
C.
,
Hu
S.
,
Ma
M.
&
Dong
Y.
2020
Comparative analysis of probability distributions for the standardized precipitation index and drought evolution in China during 1961–2015
.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
139
(
3–4
),
1363
1377
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).