Abstract
Chlorophenols are organic compounds that have garnered considerable attention in recent years because of their prevalent occurrence in the environment and associated harmful effects on ecosystems and human health. The current work investigated the photocatalytic oxidation of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol as a potential treatment option. The effects of different process-conditioning parameters were studied. Analytical-grade commercially available TiO2 reported 80% degradation, whereas nano-grade TiO2 resulted in complete removal in the same time duration. Furthermore, the study assessed the use of Degussa P-25 nano-TiO2 at varying doses for the optimization of treatment. Under the optimal dose of 250 mg/L of nano-TiO2, the complete removal of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol was observed within 210 min of the reaction period. The addition of H2O2 to further increase the rates of treatment did not yield any benefit. Under solar irradiation, almost 95% degradation of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol was observed in 315 min at an optimized photocatalyst dose. Moreover, the comparison of the operational cost of UV-photocatalysis (UV/nano-TiO2), photocatalysis with H2O2 (UV/nano-TiO2/H2O2) and solar-photocatalysis revealed costs of US$0.27 per litre, US$0.30 per litre and US$0.16 per litre, respectively, during the experimentation, thus making solar-photocatalysis the best option.
HIGHLIGHTS
Photochemical oxidation of 2,4,6-trichlorophenol (TCP) using nano-TiO2 is a potential treatment method.
The degradation method reported 71% mineralization of TCP based on analysis of total organic carbon.
High-performance liquid chromatography confirmed 99% degradation of TCP and revealed the formation of a few intermediates during the photocatalytic oxidation.
ABBREVIATIONS
INTRODUCTION
There have been several studies on the removal of polychlorophenols using photocatalysis and Fenton's treatment in silo (Pera-Titus et al. 2004; Kusvuran et al. 2005), but the studies on degradation/mineralization of TCP are very limited. The studies on monochlorophenols and dichlorophenols reported the removal of the contaminants, but limited studies on the degradation of TCPs and its toxicity have been taken into consideration so far. Since the toxicity of CPs is higher as Cl is attached at ortho- and para- positions, the degradation of TCP in textile and pulp and paper industry effluent is pertinent (Yadav et al. 2023).
Although the removal efficiency of photocatalytic oxidation is high, the chemical and energy input is also high. To minimize the cost of treatment, optimization of regulating/input parameters should be performed. The present study dealt with the optimization of nano-TiO2, an option of removing the use of H2O2, and the possibility of visible light excitation. In the present study, effort has been made to study the mineralization (degradation) of TCP based on analysis of intermediates of degradation, if any, supported by the analysis of total organic carbon (TOC) before and after photocatalytic oxidation. Finally, the operational cost of treatment was evaluated for all the options tested for the treatment of TCP-contaminated wastewater.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Chemicals
The 2,4,6-TCP (purity 98%) was obtained from Thermo Fisher Scientific (USA) and was used for the degradation experiments in the present study. The Degussa P25 nano-TiO2 (anatase to rutile ratio: 80:20) was obtained from Evonik Industries, Germany; hydrogen peroxide H2O2 (30% w/v), which was used as an oxidant, was obtained from Central Drug House (CDH), India; and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC)-grade methanol was procured from Merck & Co (India).
Experimental setup
Analysis of 2,4,6-TCP
In addition to this, the residual concentration of TCP was confirmed over HPLC (Shimadzu, Japan). The chromatographic investigation was also used to determine the residual reaction intermediates during the photocatalytic oxidation of TCP. The HPLC system (Shimadzu, LC-20AD) equipped with an UV/VIS detector (SPD-20A) and C-18 column (Inertsil® ODS-3 V, 5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm) was used for the analysis. A standard curve of the model compound (TCP) was plotted in the concentration range of 0–100 mg/L at intervals of 10 mg/L in the HPLC system. Methanol and water (70:30 v/v) were used as a mobile phase at a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min for separation by HPLC, and the response was recorded at 290 nm. Mineralization of TCP was also analysed over a TOC Analyser (TOC-L Shimadzu Make, Japan) to confirm the observation of the UV–Vis spectrophotometer and HPLC.
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Photocatalytic oxidation of TCP using TiO2 as a catalyst was found efficient in the removal of the aforementioned pollutant. The study undertook the effect of regulating parameters such as catalyst dose, catalyst size, source of light and the presence of oxidizing agent on the removal efficiency of TCP. The pH of the TCP solution was kept neutral since earlier studies have reported optimum degradation of organic impurities using Degussa P-25 TiO2 at pH 6.8 (Aljuboury et al. 2016).
Effect of catalyst type
It could also be observed that in the absence of photocatalyst, UV365 alone removed a significant proportion of TCP (∼30%), indicating that photolysis also plays a role in the removal of TCP. Considering the edge of nano-TiO2 over analytical-grade TiO2, further experimentation was conducted using nano-TiO2 for the degradation of TCP.
Effect of catalyst dose and H2O2
This can be rationalized concerning the availability of active sites on the surface of TiO2 and the effective penetration of photoactivating light in TCP–TiO2 suspension. At higher doses of TiO2, a turbid suspension inhibits the effective penetration of light. Furthermore, a lesser number of photons is absorbed causing fewer generations of hydroxyl radicals to oxidize TCP, thereby affecting the degradation efficiency, as observed in other studies as well (Verma & Haritash 2020; Pipil et al. 2022). The higher degradation efficiency while increasing the dose of TiO2 is because of the electron–hole pairs generated. The Degussa P-25 nano-TiO2 consists of rutile and anatase phases (anatase to rutile ratio: 80:20). Anatase TiO2 exhibits a longer period of electron holes with lower recombination of charge carriers. This causes mass migration of electrons and holes from the interior to the surface of anatase TiO2, whereas the rutile TiO2 part has a smaller band gap that generates electron–hole pairs when irradiated with low-energy photons, making it advantageous for anatase TiO2 to utilize these electron–hole pairs (Bagbi et al. 2017). Thus, the synergetic effect of rutile and anatase phases of TiO2 plays a crucial role in photocatalytic efficiency. The generated electron–hole pairs react either directly with the organic pollutant or with surface-bound water to produce hydroxyl radicals. Increasing the amount of TiO2 increases the availability of active sites, thus increasing the adsorption process too. Hence, the more the binding of electron–hole pairs with water, the more the production of the hydroxyl radicals.
Earlier studies on photocatalytic degradation of TCP revealed that the time for the complete removal of TCP remains extended if optimization for TiO2 dose is not taken into account. The degradation of TCP (Ci – 50 mg/L) at a TiO2 dose of 500 mg/L reported 100% degradation in 240 min (Shoneye & Tang 2020), whereas the present study reports 100% degradation within 210 min for an initial concentration of 100 mg/L TCP but at an optimized TiO2 dose of 250 mg/L. It may be important to note that optimization resulted in the degradation of two-fold concentrated wastewater with half the amount of TiO2 in a relatively short time. This may favour the treatment of more volume/concentration of effluent efficiently with reduced cost of treatment based on the results of the present study. It is also important to mention that reaction conditions should be optimized to achieve enhanced treatment efficiency. Some studies report lower reaction times (Rengaraj & Li 2006; Choi et al. 2019) compared with this study, but it is because the initial concentration of TCP there was significantly less (20–50 mg/L) than the one used (100 mg/L) in the present study. The other reason in a few studies is relatively higher doses of TiO2 being used for photocatalysis (Pandiyan et al. 2002; Choi et al. 2019), which adds to the cost of treatment.
H2O2 is a strong oxidizing agent, which was added in the experiment to increase the generation of OH radicals and to further enhance the rate of degradation. The effect of the addition of H2O2 was studied by varying the concentration at 20, 50 and 100 mM at the optimized dose of TiO2 (250 mg/L) for the removal of TCP. However, the addition of H2O2 did not result in any significant improvement for the removal of TCP in the present study. The efficacy of photocatalytic degradation in the presence of H2O2 was reported as less than 80% in 3.5 h among all the above-mentioned experimental setups.
Solar-induced photocatalysis
Mineralization of TCP
Economic analysis and recovery of TiO2
Treatment method . | Energy per hour (kWh) . | Time for treatment (min) . | Rate of energy (per kWh) (INR) . | Cost of electricity (INR) . | Chemical consumed . | Cost of chemical per litre (INR) . | Cost of treatment per litre (UD$) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UV365 photocatalysis | 0.3 | 210 | 8.50 | 8.9 | Nano-TiO2 | 11.34 | 0.27 |
Solar-photocatalysis | 0.012 | 300 | 8.5 | 0.51 | Nano-TiO2 | 11.34 | 0.16 |
UV-photocatalysis with H2O2 | 0.3 | 210 | 8.5 | 8.9 | Nano-TiO2 H2O2 (30% w/v) | 13.62 | 0.30 |
Treatment method . | Energy per hour (kWh) . | Time for treatment (min) . | Rate of energy (per kWh) (INR) . | Cost of electricity (INR) . | Chemical consumed . | Cost of chemical per litre (INR) . | Cost of treatment per litre (UD$) . |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UV365 photocatalysis | 0.3 | 210 | 8.50 | 8.9 | Nano-TiO2 | 11.34 | 0.27 |
Solar-photocatalysis | 0.012 | 300 | 8.5 | 0.51 | Nano-TiO2 | 11.34 | 0.16 |
UV-photocatalysis with H2O2 | 0.3 | 210 | 8.5 | 8.9 | Nano-TiO2 H2O2 (30% w/v) | 13.62 | 0.30 |
Photocatalysis was carried out in a fabricated UV chamber having eight UV tubes, each having a power rating of 36 W making together 288 W; also the power ratings of the magnetic stirrer and air sparger are 8.5 and 3.5 W, respectively. Therefore, the overall power consumption is 300 W or 0.3 kWh. In the case of solar-photocatalysis, only magnetic stirrer and air sparger were used, thus making a power consumption of 12 W or 0.012 kWh. The electricity cost for industrial supply in most of the states in India is INR 8.5 per unit kWh. The complete degradation efficiency of TCP under the UV/TiO2 system was observed in 210 min with a photocatalyst dose of 250 mg/L. The cost of nano-size TiO2 (P25) is INR 22,680 per 100 g but only 20% of it was consumed while 80% was recovered. Therefore, the cost of the photocatalyst is INR 11.34 per litre for synthetic wastewater treatment (for 250 mg/L dose of TiO2) in UV/TiO2, UV/H2O2/TiO2 and solar/TiO2 systems. Thus, the overall operational cost of the UV/TiO2 treatment process is INR 14.57 or US$0.27. In the case of UV/H2O2/TiO2, the additional cost of oxidant chemicals occurred, making together the cost of treatment per litre US$0.30. However, a considerable cost of treatment was saved in the case of solar-photocatalysis (US$0.16 per litre).
CONCLUSION
CPs give rise to significant environmental concerns owing to their toxicity, carcinogenicity and bioaccumulation potential, especially in the aquatic environment. Inefficient treatment of these xenobiotics in industrial effluents and discharge of partially treated wastewater further aggravate the environmental and health issues. The present study reported the efficacy of photocatalytic oxidation as a potential method for the removal/degradation of 2,4,6-TCP. The removal efficiency of the treatment methods follows the order of 80% < 95% < 100% for UV/nano-TiO2/H2O2 < solar-photocatalysis < UV-photocatalysis, respectively. The rate of reaction was faster in the case of UV-photocatalysis; however, it may be replaced by solar for low-strength or low-volume wastewater, further reducing the burden of cost. Despite the non-avoidable cost associated with chemicals and energy input, optimization of such chemical oxidation methods can significantly reduce the operational cost as observed in the case of catalyst optimization. Compared with the limited removal rate of conventional treatment and persistence of CPs in the environment, photochemical oxidation using nano-TiO2 is a promising treatment approach, since it leads to the mineralization of TCP and elimination of associated residual toxicity besides bringing down the organic load in wastewater. Additionally, the cost of treatment of effluent is a governing factor for industries and solar-induced removal of such contaminants could be a cost-effective approach. As no modification in the solar spectrum can take place, solar energy could be exploited and harnessed to increase the efficiency of the treatment system. Thus, solar-photocatalytic oxidation can serve as a sustainable treatment option for the degradation of 2,4,6-TCP considering its benefits to the environment and health.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors are grateful to the Department of Environmental Engineering at DTU for providing the infrastructure and opportunity for carrying out the present study.
AUTHORS’ CONTRIBUTIONS
H. Pipil and S. Yadav contributed to the conceptualization, execution, data compilation and draft writing of this research. S. Kumar and A. K. Haritash contributed to the conceptualization as well as supervising, reviewing and editing the manuscript.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare there is no conflict.