Varied streamflow response to climate between river basins and seasons highlight the importance of further research on different basins and watersheds in different seasons to help plan adaptation options at watershed scale. This study investigated the hydrological impacts of climate change over the Yadot watershed. The multi model ensemble of three regional climate models (CCLM4.8, RACMO22T, and RCA4) under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 emission scenarios for 2021 -2050 and 2051–2080 were used. The SWAT model was used to simulate the streamflow. Climate model projections have indicated that precipitation will slightly increase during both the wet and dry seasons from 0.59%–2.08% and 0.02%–1.59%, respectively. The annual projected precipitation will increase by 0.13%–1.66%. The change in the projected maximum and minimum temperatures in both dry and wet seasons increased by a range of 0.61°C–1.9°C and 0.65°C–2.07°C, respectively. Similarly, the change in the projected minimum temperatures in both dry and wet seasons increased by a range of 1.07°C–2.01°C and 0.06°C–1.66°C, respectively. The wet and dry season streamflow increased by 6.23%–9.36% and 3.16%–5.46%, respectively. The findings of this study can help to guide water resources planners and designers in planning and managing water resources effectively for future use.

  • The projected seasonal and annual rainfall is likely to increase in the future.

  • The change in temperature is to rise by up to 2°C.

  • The annual and seasonal streamflow changes are expected to increase.

  • The increase in streamflows could be attributed to the increase in precipitation.

There is scientific consensus that the global average temperature increased during the 20th century and will continue for the next several decades. According to the sixth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climatic Change, global surface temperature has increased by 0.99 °C from 1850 to 1900 to the first two decades of the 21st century (2001–2020) and by 1.09 °C from 1850–1900 to 2011–2020 (IPCC 2021). These changes in global temperature have been accompanied by changes in climate patterns in various ways (Feng et al. 2014). Water resources are currently under severe pressure because of the impacts of climate change and human activities, which include land use change, increasing population growth, and economic development (IPCC 2013). Human-induced climate change has driven detectable changes in the global water cycle since the mid-20th century, and it is projected to cause substantial further changes at both global and regional scales (IPCC 2021). Changes in climate may cause changes in hydrological processes such as evapotranspiration, surface runoff, and flood events (Neupane & Kumar 2015). Temperature and precipitation patterns are two significant characteristics of climate change that have a direct impact on nearly all other hydrological responses (Azari et al. 2016). The changes in temperature and precipitation have a direct consequence for the quantity of the evapotranspiration component, and on both the quality and quantity of the streamflow component. Therefore, understanding and quantifying their respective influence is of great importance to water resource management and socioeconomic activities as well as policy and planning for sustainable development (Yang et al. 2017).

East Africa stands as one of the hot spot locations for the impacts of climate change (IPCC 2022). The future projected change in annual precipitation and temperature shows an increase in most parts of East Africa such as Ethiopia, Kenya, Uganda, and Tanzania (IPCC 2014; Gebrechorkos et al. 2023). Future temperature projections indicate a potential increase of 1.8–4.3 °C by 2100 in the region (Trisos et al. 2022). Similarly, rainfall will increase in the 21st century relative to the 20th century (Ongoma et al. 2018). Generally, despite the inherent uncertainties that exist in GCMs, most studies agree that the rainfall over the larger part of the Great Horn of Africa is likely to increase in the 21st century (Shongwe et al. 2011; Christensen et al. 2013; Tierney et al. 2015). Accordingly, the projected change in annual streamflow is projected to increase in the major river basins of Ethiopia, Kenya, and Uganda in the 2020s, 2050s, and 2080s (Gebrechorkos et al. 2023).

Recent modeling studies on the impact of climate change on hydrological and meteorological parameters reported a future increase in temperature and streamflow (Li & Fang 2021; Lotfirad et al. 2021, 2023; Shokouhifar et al. 2022). For example, Li & Fang (2021) studied climate change impacts on the streamflow for the Mun River in the Mekong Basin, Southeast Asia and reported a consistent increase in Tmin and Tmax in three future time slices (2030s, 2060s, and 2080s) under three RCPs (2.6, 4.5, and 8.5). Similarly, a study of climate change effects on flood frequency by Shokouhifar et al. (2022) in the Hablehroud basin, north-central Iran reported an increase in temperature and rainfall and a subsequent increase in runoff and flooding. Despite there being a consistent warming trend, the sign and magnitude of future streamflow changes vary between climate simulations and river basins, mainly due to the uncertainties in the hydrologic projections (Hirpa et al. 2019).

Ethiopia has become warmer over the past century and future climate change will bring further warming over the next century (Gashaw & Mahari 2014). In Ethiopia, over the past few decades, changes in rainfall and temperature have affected the various components of the hydrological cycle in major river basins (Gebremichael et al. 2013). In Ethiopia, the main climate change manifestations such as frequent and severe floods and hydrological droughts have become a common problem. Future predictions also indicate that changes in climate will lead to recurrent droughts and heavy rainfall in different parts of Ethiopia, reducing the amount of land that can be used for agriculture and decreasing crop productivity (Admassie & Abebaw 2021). Almost all food crops and most industrial crops in Ethiopia are produced by rain-fed agriculture, which is very sensitive to climate variations. Water scarcity, wildfires, flooding, and droughts have all been linked to the possible consequences of climate change on the country's hydrological cycles (Cheng et al. 2017).

Several studies have examined the impacts of climate change on the streamflow of catchments and basins in Ethiopia (Abraham et al. 2018; Boru et al. 2019; Negewo & Sarma 2021; Tarekegn et al. 2021; Abdulahia et al. 2022; Daniel & Abate 2022; Edamo et al. 2022; Gurara et al. 2023). Most of these studies have assessed the projections of rainfall and temperature and their impact on streamflow. Heterogeneous precipitation changes and consistent warming trends caused variations in streamflow projection in different watersheds and basins of Ethiopia (Boru et al. 2019; Hirpa et al. 2019; Chakilu et al. 2020; Bekele et al. 2021; Edamo et al. 2022; Gurara et al. 2023). For instance, the mean annual and wet season (Kiremt) streamflow projections decreased in the Blue Nile, Upper Awash, OmoGhibe and Baro River basins (Hirpa et al. 2019; Daba & You 2020; Orkodjo et al. 2022). However, projected annual and wet season (Kiremt) streamflow increased in the Lake Tana, Tekeze and Genale river sub-basins (Gizaw et al. 2017; Fentaw et al. 2018; Chakilu et al. 2020; Abdulahia et al. 2022). The dry season streamflow is also expected to decrease in most of the sub-basins, such as in the Arjo-Didessa, Upper Awash, and Lake Tana sub-basins (Bekele et al. 2021; Abdulahia et al. 2022; Chakilu et al. 2022). Thus, such varied streamflow response to climate between river basins and seasons highlights the importance of further research on different basins and watersheds in different seasons to help plan adaptation options at watershed scale. Understanding climate change and its impact on hydrological variability is critical for water management.

Surface water resource sustainability is still a current area of focus due to the significant impact of climatic variability, which can be better mitigated by understanding the past and predicting its future consequences (Boko et al. 2020). Regional hydrology is extremely vulnerable to changing climatic conditions; consequently, it is crucial to evaluate climate change projections in order to determine if the availability of water will likely be sufficient to meet demand in the future (Tessema et al. 2021). According to Worqlul et al. (2018) and Sesana et al. (2019), the future availability of streamflow could have an impact on agricultural production, socioeconomic systems, and environmental sustainability. Therefore, it is necessary to understand how climate change may affect future streamflow fluctuations in order to adapt various mitigation techniques for planning water resource management.

Possible future changes in the precipitation and temperature extremes can be predicted by global circulation models (GCMs). However, GCMs face large uncertainties and biases due to their mathematical formulation, spatial resolution, initial condition and forcings, and model calibration processes, which limits their application in regional and local scale impact assessment studies (Khan et al. 2018; Salman et al. 2018; Kamruzzaman et al. 2021). Thus, climate change impact studies usually require climate projection information at finer spatial and temporal scales than the typical GCM grid resolutions and thus, dynamic downscaling with regional climate models (RCMs) is capable of addressing this scale gap (Givati et al. 2019; Sanjay Shekar & Vinay 2021).

The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) is a physical-based, semi-distributed, basin-scale hydrological model and is frequently employed in research to simulate the hydrologic processes of watersheds with an emphasis on the impact of climate change (Zhang et al. 2016). Despite this, machine learning methods are promising for simulating the complex hydrological processes under climate change conditions (Anaraki et al. 2021, 2023; Nguyen et al. 2023). The SWAT hydrologic model continues to be a widely applicable model. For example, various recent studies have examined the impacts of climate change on the streamflow using the SWAT model in Ethiopia (Negewo & Sarma 2021; Tarekegn et al. 2021; Abdulahia et al. 2022; Daniel & Abate 2022; Edamo et al. 2022; Gurara et al. 2023) and elsewhere (Li & Fang 2021; Ismail et al. 2022; Reshma and Arunkumar, 2023). Moreover, based on the recent comparative study of SWAT and HEC-HMS for streamflow simulation in the Lower Godavari Basin and sub-humid tropical Hemavathi catchment, India, SWAT has shown exceptional simulating ability in calibration and validation (Sanjay Shekar & Vinay 2021; Vogeti et al. 2023).

Thus, the specific objectives of this study are to assess the projected climate for the near- and mid-term and to examine the separate and combined impact of climate and LULC changes during the near-term (2021–2050) and mid-term (2051–2080) periods under medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP8.5) emission scenarios using SWAT hydrological model and downscaled climatic data from CORDEX-RCMs output.

Description of the study watershed

The Yadot River watershed is a sub-basin of the Genale Dawa basin, Ethiopia, which is geographically located between 6° 18′N and 6° 51′N latitudes, and 39°49′E and 39°58′E longitudes (Figure 1). The Yadot River originates in the Bale Mountains at an elevation of 4,373 meters above mean sea level and descends to an elevation of 946 m above mean sea level at the watershed's mouth. The watershed's total area coverage is 735.6 km2. The Yadot River has been badly impacted by the spread of urbanization and agriculture, as well as a decrease in the watershed's forest cover due to rapid deforestation as the number of settlements grows.
Figure 1

Study area location of the Yadot watershed.

Figure 1

Study area location of the Yadot watershed.

Close modal

Two different wet seasons occur in Ethiopia's southern regions as the ITCZ passes through on its way to its southern position. With two wet seasons, the entire Genale River sub-basin is subjected to a ‘bi-modal’ rainfall regime. Rainfall is most abundant from March to May, with a peak flow in May, and then again from September to November, with high rainfall in October. The watershed's mean annual rainfall ranges from 975 mm in Rira to 1,059 mm in Delo Mena, with a mean annual areal rainfall of 1,029 mm. It is commonly acknowledged that temperature distribution in the region is substantially influenced by elevation. At Delo Mena and Rira meteorological stations, the mean annual minimum and maximum temperatures range from 21.6 to 28.72 °C and 9.78 to 15.62 °C, respectively. During the study period, the watersheds' mean annual temperature ranged from 12.7 to 25.16 °C.

Baseline and future climate data

Baseline climate data

The daily precipitation, maximum and minimum temperature data used for this study from Delo Mena and Rira meteorological stations located within and around the Yadot watershed were obtained from Ethiopia's National Meteorological Agency. The climate data cover 31 years, from January 1985 to December 2015.

Future climate data projection: GCMs and RCMs

The future daily precipitation, maximum and minimum temperatures were obtained from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), which dynamically downscaled RCM data from the CORDEX-Africa domain at a spatial grid resolution of 0.44° (50 km). The methodology involves running a multi-model ensemble of three RCMs namely (Regional Climate Limited-area Modeling (CCLM4.48), Rossby Center regional atmospheric model (RCA4), and KNMI Regional Atmospheric Climate Model, version 22 (RACMO22T) and downloaded from a public website, (https://climate4impact.eu/impactportal/data/esgfsearch.jsp) were used in this study (Table 1). The selected RCMs were widely applied in Africa (Lennard et al. 2018) and East Africa (Endris et al. 2013). The use of an ensemble mean of different RCMs helps to reduce the greatest and lowest projections and allows for the minimization of uncertainties. The downloaded climatic data from CORDEX-RCM is saved in NetCDF format with a rotated pole of longitude and latitude, which is then retrieved using ArcGIS10.4.1. The quantities of precipitation and temperature were kg/m2/s and Kelvin, respectively. Thus, before utilizing the data in any impact study, the rotated pole and units must be corrected. As a result, 86,400 multiplied the above data (24*60*60) to produce precipitation in mm/day and to obtain temperature in Celsius by subtracting 273.15 from downscaled data using the above conversion factors. These RCMs were downscaled using HadGEM2-ES, MPI-ESM-LR and EC-EARTH GCMs.

Table 1

GCM and RCM models used in the study

GCM full nameRCM full descriptionResolutionClimate center
Hadley Global Environment Model 2-Earth System (HadGEM2-ESRegional Climate Limited-Area Modeling (CCLM0.44° Met Office Hadley Center 
Coupled Model Version 5, Medium Resolution (MPI-ESM-LRRossby Center Regional Atmospheric Model (RCA40.44° Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M) 
Irish Center for High-End Computing Earth Consortium (EC-EARTHKNMI Regional Atmospheric Climate Model, version 2.2 (RACMO22T0.44° EC-EARTH Consortium 
GCM full nameRCM full descriptionResolutionClimate center
Hadley Global Environment Model 2-Earth System (HadGEM2-ESRegional Climate Limited-Area Modeling (CCLM0.44° Met Office Hadley Center 
Coupled Model Version 5, Medium Resolution (MPI-ESM-LRRossby Center Regional Atmospheric Model (RCA40.44° Max Planck Institute for Meteorology (MPI-M) 
Irish Center for High-End Computing Earth Consortium (EC-EARTHKNMI Regional Atmospheric Climate Model, version 2.2 (RACMO22T0.44° EC-EARTH Consortium 

RCMs bias correction

To bias-correct the simulated precipitation data, a non-linear correction technique was applied. Using this method, the mean and standard deviation of the daily precipitation distribution are equal to those of the observed distribution (e.g. Lafon et al. 2013). The following equation (Equation (1)) was used.
(1)
where P* is bias-adjusted daily precipitation, P is the uncorrected daily precipitation, and a and b are the transformation coefficients. The ‘b’ parameter is determined iteratively until the coefficient of variation of the corrected RCM daily precipitation time series equals that of the observed precipitation time series for each grid box in each month. The coefficient ‘a’ is determined from the mean of observed rainfall data and uncorrected daily future rainfall data of Pb. Finally, in order to construct the corrected daily time series, monthly constants a and b are applied to each uncorrected daily observation corresponding to that month. Variance Scaling is a technique for adjusting the mean and variation of normally distributed quantities like temperature (Teutschbein & Seibert 2012). In most cases, the temperature is adjusted using an equation (Equation (2)) indicated as follows.
(2)
where Tc is the corrected daily temperature; T is the RCM model's uncorrected daily temperature; To is the observed temperature's standard deviation; T is the uncorrected temperature's standard deviation; T is the simulated mean temperature; and To is the observed mean temperature.

SWAT model description

The hydrological SWAT model was developed to investigate how land use, land cover, and management affect water and sediment at the watershed level over the course of a day, monthly, and annual time increments.

The SWAT is a semi-distributed open-source model with a wide and rising number of model applications spanning from watershed to continental dimensions (Neitsch et al. 2011; Arnold et al. 2012). It looks at how LULC and climate change affect water resources in a basin with different soil, land use, and management techniques through time (Arnold et al. 2012). Thus, the SWAT hydrological model has been utilized effectively in investigations of the effects of land use/cover, and climate change on water resources in basins with variable soil, land use, and management techniques across time (Arnold et al. 2012). The SWAT model has clearly produced great accuracy for short- and long-term simulations of annual and monthly mean streamflow (Zuo et al. 2016; Anand et al. 2018).

SWAT divides the watershed into various sub-basins, which are further segmented into hydrological response units (HRUs) with similar land use management, slope, and soil characteristics (Arnold et al. 1998, 2012). HRUs are the smallest units of the watershed where important hydrologic components including evapotranspiration, surface runoff and peak rate of runoff, groundwater flow, and sediment yield may be calculated. All of the mechanisms in SWAT are determined using equations (Equation (3)) that are driven by water balance.
(3)
where SWt represents the final soil water content (in mmH2O), SWo represents the initial soil water content on day 1 , t represents the time (days). In addition, Rday represents the amount of precipitation on specific days 1 (mmH2O), Qsurf represents the amount of surface runoff on specific days 1 (mmH2O), Ea represents the amount of evapotranspiration on a day 1 (mmH2O), and Wseep represents the amount of water.
For this study, to compute surface runoff for each HRU, the SCN-CN method was used with the equation (Equation (4)) indicated below (Arnold & Fohrer 2005):
(4)
where Rsurf is depth of daily accumulated runoff (mm), S is a retention parameter, and Pday is the daily rainfall depth (mm). The above equation indicates that surface runoff in a watershed occurs when the depth of rainfall in a day (Pday) is greater than 0.2S.
In terms of curve number (CN), parameter S is computed by Equation (5). S is affected by slope, types of soil, and land use management practices:
(5)

Finally, the saturated hydraulic conductivity was determined from the soil data by SWAT.

SWAT model inputs

Digital elevation model

For the extraction of flow direction, flow accumulation, stream network construction, and delineation of the watershed and sub-basins, a digital elevation model (DEM) with a resolution of 12.5 by 12.5 meters was employed. For this study, the DEM of 12.5 × 12.5 m was obtained from https://vertex.daac.asf.alaska.edu/website.

Land Use/ cover data

The LULC maps of 2015 were obtained from Landsat images of Landsat 8 OLI using ERDAS Imagine 2015 packages. The images were obtained from the USGS (https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/) website.

Soil types
According to the Food and Agricultural Organization – Harmonized World Soil Database (FAO-HWSD) soil classification, there were eight soil types found in the study watershed, with pellic vertisols and chromic vertisols covering 37.84 and 26.42% of the total area, respectively (Figure 2).
Figure 2

The soil map of the Yadot watershed.

Figure 2

The soil map of the Yadot watershed.

Close modal
Hydro meteorological data

Daily precipitation, maximum and minimum temperature, relative humidity, wind speed, and solar radiation data were gathered for 31 years, from 1985 to 2015, from Ethiopia's National Meteorological Agency (Table 2). The observed daily streamflow data of Yadot River at the Delo Mena gauging station were obtained from the Ministry of Water, Irrigation and Electricity from 1985 to 2008 for calibration and validation (Table 2).

Table 2

Data source, location and time span of hydrological and meteorological stations

NoMeteorological stationsData sourceLocationTime
Delo Mena (all parameters) NMAE Lat: 6.42 & Long: 39.83 1985–2015 
Rira (all parameters) NMAE Lat: 7.02 & Long: 39.83 1985–2015 
Hydrological Station
Near Delo Mena MEWRE Lat: 6.25 N & Long: 39.51E 1985–2008 
NoMeteorological stationsData sourceLocationTime
Delo Mena (all parameters) NMAE Lat: 6.42 & Long: 39.83 1985–2015 
Rira (all parameters) NMAE Lat: 7.02 & Long: 39.83 1985–2015 
Hydrological Station
Near Delo Mena MEWRE Lat: 6.25 N & Long: 39.51E 1985–2008 

NMAE, National Meteorological Agency of Ethiopia; MEWRE, Minister of Energy and Water Resources of Ethiopia.

Sensitivity analysis, calibration, validation, and performance of the SWAT model

Sensitive SWAT parameters

Sensitivity analysis has been carried out in this study utilizing the SUFI-2 (Sequential Uncertainty Fitting-2) technique, which is the interface of SWAT–CUP (Soil and Water Assessment Tool–Calibration Uncertainty Program), (Malik et al. 2022). Using a global sensitivity analysis, a monthly time-step sensitivity analysis was done to determine the most sensitive parameters.

Calibration, validation, and performance evaluation of SWAT

The calibration and validation for this investigation were done at the Delo Mena gauge station during a 24-year period (1 January 1985 to 31 December 2008). The first three years of data from 1 January 1985–31 December 1987 were used to warm up the model, whereas the calibration and validation periods were from 1 January 1988–31 December 2002 and 1 January 2003–31 December 2008, respectively. The model parameters were changed manually until the modeled discharge was within the statistically acceptable model performance. The SWAT model's performance was further evaluated using graphical and statistical methodologies until acceptable values for surface runoff were independently found. Validation at the watershed's outflow enables direct comparison of model outputs to an independent data set without any adjustments.

Simulation of climate change impact on streamflow using the SWAT model

The impact of climate change on streamflow was determined by using near-term (2021–2050) and mid-term (2051–2080) period projected climate under medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP8.5) emission scenarios and 2015 LULC data as input. The baseline climate data used for the simulation was from 1985 to 2015. Thus, the relative change was quantified by comparing the projected streamflow for the two 30-year time slices in the near-term (2021–2050) and mid-term (2051–2080) periods against the baseline period (1985 to 2015). For all simulations, we computed the projected change (as the percent change compared to the baseline) in the 30-year mean and seasonal streamflow relative to the baseline period. The first streamflow simulation was carried out using the baseline climate data (1985–2015). After the simulation of baseline streamflow, the near-term streamflow simulation was carried out using near-term (2021–2050) climate data under medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP8.5) emission scenarios. Finally, the impact of climate change on streamflow under the near-term period under both scenarios was determined by subtracting the simulated streamflow during the near-term period under both medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP8.5) emission scenarios from the baseline simulated streamflow. In a similar procedure, the impact of climate change on streamflow under the mid-term period under both scenarios was determined by subtracting the simulated streamflow during the mid-term period under both medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP8.5) emission scenarios from the baseline simulated streamflow value.

Bias correction for projected precipitation and temperature data

Figure 3 presents the results of the bias-adjusted rainfall mean monthly precipitation in comparison to observed data for the baseline period of 1985–2015 using the non-linear bias correction approach. As indicated in the figure below, the bias-corrected data is significantly improved and fitted well with observed data.
Figure 3

Bias-corrected mean monthly precipitation under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 emission scenarios against the observed data.

Figure 3

Bias-corrected mean monthly precipitation under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 emission scenarios against the observed data.

Close modal
Similarly, the bias-corrected temperature data significantly improved and fitted well with observed data (Figure 4(a) and 4(b)).
Figure 4

Bias-corrected mean monthly (a) Tmax and (b) Tmin under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 emission scenarios against the observed data.

Figure 4

Bias-corrected mean monthly (a) Tmax and (b) Tmin under RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 emission scenarios against the observed data.

Close modal

Sensitive SWAT parameters

The characteristics that regulate and govern streamflow in the watershed, as well as those linked to surface runoff, groundwater, and evaporation, were selected as the most sensitive parameters of the SWAT model (Table 3). The most important sensitive factors for streamflow predictions were determined to be maximum canopy storage (CANMX), SCS runoff curve number (CN2), saturation hydraulic conductivity (SOL K), and soil evaporation compensation factor (ESCO). Similarly, Negewo & Sarma (2021) recognized (CN2) and (SOL K) as the most sensitive parameters for runoff estimates in the Genale watershed. Similarly, Beyene et al. (2018) identified (CN2) and (CANMX) as highly sensitive parameters in the upper Awash Basin.

Table 3

The rank and fitted value of sensitive flow parameters

Parameter nameSensitivity rankt-statP-valueMin valueMax valueFitted value
2:V__CANMX.hru −28.82 0.00 0.00 20.50 2.70 
1:R__CN2.mgt −23.56 0.00 −0.18 1.70 −0.12 
3:R__SOL_K (..).sol 12.54 0.00 −0.09 0.21 0.20 
4:V__ESCO.hru 7.44 0.00 0.89 0.98 0.98 
8:V__CH_K2.rte 3.92 0.00 30.18 85.08 75.61 
6:R__SOL_AWC (..).sol 3.57 0.00 −0.10 0.23 −0.01 
10:V__GW_DELAY.gw −1.69 0.09 52.19 67.10 61.84 
9:V__GWQMN.gw 0.43 0.67 3,379.73 3,682.36 3,423.16 
7:V__ALPHA_BF.gw −0.29 0.77 0.65 0.86 0.81 
5:V__RCHRG_DP.gw 10 −0.01 0.99 0.78 0.89 0.88 
Parameter nameSensitivity rankt-statP-valueMin valueMax valueFitted value
2:V__CANMX.hru −28.82 0.00 0.00 20.50 2.70 
1:R__CN2.mgt −23.56 0.00 −0.18 1.70 −0.12 
3:R__SOL_K (..).sol 12.54 0.00 −0.09 0.21 0.20 
4:V__ESCO.hru 7.44 0.00 0.89 0.98 0.98 
8:V__CH_K2.rte 3.92 0.00 30.18 85.08 75.61 
6:R__SOL_AWC (..).sol 3.57 0.00 −0.10 0.23 −0.01 
10:V__GW_DELAY.gw −1.69 0.09 52.19 67.10 61.84 
9:V__GWQMN.gw 0.43 0.67 3,379.73 3,682.36 3,423.16 
7:V__ALPHA_BF.gw −0.29 0.77 0.65 0.86 0.81 
5:V__RCHRG_DP.gw 10 −0.01 0.99 0.78 0.89 0.88 

Note: A indicates add the fitted value to the existing value, V implies replace the existing value with the fitted value; R indicates multiply the existing value with (1 + the fitted value).

Calibration and validation of the SWAT model

Figure 5 indicates the graphical comparison of observed and simulated streamflows for the calibration (1988–2002) and validation (2003–2008) periods. Table 4 also indicates the statistical performance of indices. Overall, the SWAT model simulation has captured the observed streamflow reasonably well. The obtained R2 (0.80 for calibration and 0.83 for validation) values show very good consistency between the observed and simulated data. The validation result verified the model's performance for simulated flows in periods other than the calibration period without requiring any further adjustments to the calibrated parameters. Similarly, past studies indicated the satisfactory performance of the SWAT model in the Genale Dawa basin with statistical model performance measures, coefficient of determination (R2) of 0.87 and the Nash–Sutcliffe simulation efficiency (ENS) of 0.81 for calibration and 0.85, and 0.78, for validation, respectively (Negewo & Sarma 2021).
Table 4

SWAT model performance evaluation statistics for calibration and validation

PeriodsModel performance evaluation criteria
R2NSE% PBIASRSRP-factorsR- factors
Calibration (1988–2002) 0.80 0.73 16.1 0.52 0.76 0.81 
Validation (2003–2008) 0.83 0.77 11.2 0.48 0.82 0.79 
PeriodsModel performance evaluation criteria
R2NSE% PBIASRSRP-factorsR- factors
Calibration (1988–2002) 0.80 0.73 16.1 0.52 0.76 0.81 
Validation (2003–2008) 0.83 0.77 11.2 0.48 0.82 0.79 
Figure 5

Calibration and validation of average monthly streamflow with areal rainfall.

Figure 5

Calibration and validation of average monthly streamflow with areal rainfall.

Close modal

Projected changes in precipitation and temperature

Projected changes in monthly precipitation

Figure 6 presents changes in monthly precipitation during the near-term (2021–2050) and mid-term (2050–2080) periods under medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP 8.5) emission scenarios. The change in monthly precipitation showed mixed signs in the direction of change. The change in monthly precipitation in January, July, September, October and November is likely to increase during both the near-term and mid-term periods under both scenarios. However, the change in monthly precipitation in April, May, June, and December is likely to decrease during both the near-term and mid-term periods under both scenarios. In the near-term, mean monthly rainfall may increase during the months of May and August under both medium and high emission scenarios. There is no clear pattern of change for the mean monthly precipitation in the Genale Dawa basin. Similarly, previous studies in the Genale Dawa basin reported a mixed trend of future precipitation projection. For example, Gragn et al. (2019) reported both increasing and decreasing monthly precipitation trends for both RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios for a future period (2018–2077) in Awata River Watershed, Genale Dawa Basin, Ethiopia. Thus, the monthly precipitation did not exhibit a systematic rise or reduction.
Figure 6

Changes in monthly precipitation during near (2021–2050) and mid-term (2051–2080) period under medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP8.5) emission scenarios.

Figure 6

Changes in monthly precipitation during near (2021–2050) and mid-term (2051–2080) period under medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP8.5) emission scenarios.

Close modal

Projected changes in seasonal and annual precipitation

The seasonal classifications were developed based on the research area's rainfall patterns into dry season (January, February, June, July, and December) and wet season (March, April, May, August, September, October, and November). The change in projected wet and dry season precipitation increased during both projection periods (near- and mid-term) and under both emission scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) except for a decrease in the wet season during the near-term period (2021–2050) under the high emission scenario (RCP8.5) (Figure 7). Similarly, the annual precipitation increased during both projection periods (near- and mid-term) and under both emission scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) except a decrease during the near-term period (2021–2050) under high emission scenario (RCP8.5) (Figure 7). The highest increased projected precipitation (2.08%) was obtained in the dry season during the mid-term period and under a high emission scenario (Figure 7). The mid-term period (2050–2080) under the high emission scenario (RCP8.5) showed the highest projected precipitation increase than other periods and emission scenarios. The projected wet season and mean annual precipitation continuously increased from the near-term to the mid-term period under a medium emission scenario (RCP8.5). Similarly, the projected wet season and mean annual precipitation continuously increased from the near-term to the mid-term period under a high emission scenario (RCP8.5). Generally, the projected wet and dry season precipitation is likely to increase during the near- and mid-term periods under medium and high emission scenarios in the study area. The projected annual precipitation also increased in all periods and scenarios except during the near-term period under a high emission scenario.
Figure 7

Changes in seasonal and annual precipitation during near-term (2021–2050) and mid-term (2051–2080) periods under medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP 8.5) emission scenarios.

Figure 7

Changes in seasonal and annual precipitation during near-term (2021–2050) and mid-term (2051–2080) periods under medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP 8.5) emission scenarios.

Close modal

The findings of this study are in line with other previous studies in the region. For instance, Gragn et al. (2019) reported increasing mean annual precipitation during the near-term (2020) and mid-term (2050) period under both the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 emission scenarios in the Awata River watershed of the Genale Dawa basin. A similar study by Gurara et al. (2023) reported a rising projected annual precipitation trend toward the end of the twenty-first century under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 emission scenarios in the Upper Wabe Bridge Watershed in the Wabe Shebelle River Basin. According to Seyoum et al. (2017), the mean annual precipitation is projected to increase by about up to 9% in the 2080s in the Awash, Baro, Genale, and Tekeze rivers basins of Ethiopia. Precipitation in the upper Blue Nile River Basin in the Lake Tana Basin might increase by up to 25% (Getachew et al. 2021).

Projected changes in seasonal and annual temperature

Figure 8 presents changes in maximum temperature (°C) during the near-term (2021–2050) and mid-term (2051–2080) periods under medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP 8.5) emission scenarios. The change in the projected maximum temperature in both dry and wet seasons increased during near-term and mid-term periods under both medium and high emission scenarios. During the near-term period, the change in the maximum temperature showed almost a similar amount of magnitude in both dry and wet seasons under both scenarios. However, during the mid-term period, the maximum temperature showed a higher magnitude increase as compared to the near-term period in both dry and wet seasons under both scenarios. The change in projected maximum temperature was the highest (almost reaching 2 °C) in the dry season during the mid-term period under a high emission scenario. The mid-term period under the high emission scenario generally showed the highest magnitude projected maximum temperature increase than near-term and medium emission scenarios during both seasons. This greater magnitude of maximum temperature increase during high emission scenarios may be attributed to higher CO2 concentrations in high emission scenarios than medium emission scenarios. Generally, the change in projected maximum temperature will be higher during the dry season than the wet season during both periods and scenarios. Thus, the dry season will be getting warmer than the wet season. Overall, during the near-term and mid-term periods, the study region will be getting warmer. The magnitude of the projected maximum temperature during the mid-term period is slightly higher than the near-term period under both scenarios for both dry and wet seasons and annually (Figure 8).
Figure 8

Changes in maximum temperature (°C) during near-term (2021–2050) and mid-term (2051–2080) period under medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP 8.5) emission scenarios.

Figure 8

Changes in maximum temperature (°C) during near-term (2021–2050) and mid-term (2051–2080) period under medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP 8.5) emission scenarios.

Close modal
Figure 9 presents changes in minimum temperature (°C) during the near-term (2021–2050) and mid-term (2051–2080) periods under medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP 8.5) emission scenarios. The change in projected minimum temperature will be higher than 1 °C in the dry season during both projected periods and under both scenarios. However, the change in the projected wet season minimum temperature will be less than 1 °C during both projected periods and under both scenarios, except during the mid-term period under medium emission scenarios where the change will increase up to 1.6 °C. The change in the projected wet season minimum temperature during the near-term period is very small which is less than 0.2 °C as compared to the mid-term period where the change is more than 0.5 °C. Therefore, the mid-term period will be getting warmer than the near-term period. However, unlike the projected period, the medium and high emission scenarios did not show any pattern of change in the projected minimum temperature change. Generally, the projected seasonal minimum temperature showed a consistent increase during both seasons. However, the magnitude of the increase will be greater in the dry season than in the wet season.
Figure 9

Changes in minimum temperature (°C) during near-term (2021–2050) and mid-term (2050–2080) periods under medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP 8.5) emission scenarios.

Figure 9

Changes in minimum temperature (°C) during near-term (2021–2050) and mid-term (2050–2080) periods under medium (RCP4.5) and high (RCP 8.5) emission scenarios.

Close modal

The magnitude of the projected minimum temperature during the mid-term period is slightly higher than the near-term period under both scenarios for both dry and wet seasons and annually (Figure 9).

The change in projected annual maximum and minimum temperature showed a consistent increase in the near-term and mid-term periods under both scenarios with a higher rate of increase toward the end of the century. It also noted that the rate of change of maximum temperature is higher than the rate of change of minimum temperature. The pattern of change of projected annual maximum and minimum temperature almost follows the same pattern as that of seasonal changes.

The increased temperature result in this research is consistent with other previous studies in the region and elsewhere. Similarly, the studies in the Genale Dawa basin reported a more warming projected temperature (Muleta 2017; Gragn et al. 2019; Negewo & Sarma 2021). Similar studies in the Finchaa catchment and Upper Wabe Bridge Watershed in the Wabe Shebele River Basin by Dibaba et al. (2020) and Gurara et al. (2023) showed a consistent maximum and minimum temperature increase for all time horizons, with a higher rate of increase toward the end of the century. Overall regional studies reported a future projected warming in sub-Saharan Africa and increased precipitation in East Africa (Serdeczny et al. 2017).

The overall projected temperature change (maximum and minimum temperature) during both near-term and mid-term periods consistently showed an increase. However, the magnitude of change during the mid-term period is slightly higher than the near-term period under both scenarios for both dry and wet seasons and annually.

Monthly, seasonal, and annual climate change impact on the streamflow

The mean monthly percentage change of streamflow in the near-term and mid-term periods under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios from the baseline streamflow are presented in Figure 10. The mean monthly streamflow may be expected to increase for all months except for the months of February, July, August and September which showed a decrease in the near- and mid-term periods under both scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios). Despite the increase in rainfall during the months of July, August, and September, streamflow during those months decreased which could be attributed to a huge increase in maximum temperature during those months (July, August and September) that could increase evapotranspiration. Past studies substantiate this argument as it suggested that in summer, high temperatures increase evaporative demand which can reduce streamflow directly through evaporation and through reduced soil moisture inputs (Luo et al. 2017; Dai et al. 2018).
Figure 10

Changes in mean monthly streamflow for near-term and mid-term periods under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios.

Figure 10

Changes in mean monthly streamflow for near-term and mid-term periods under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios.

Close modal

The seasonal variation of projected streamflow from the baseline period was computed for wet (March to May and August to November) and dry (January, February, June, July and December) seasons. Future changes in streamflows for wet and dry seasons are important to understand the hydrological impact of climate change. The wet season mean streamflow of the watershed is expected to increase by 8.48 and 6.23% from the baseline flow in the near-term under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, respectively. Similarly, mid-term mean wet season streamflow may increase by 9.36 and 7.21% from the baseline streamflow under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, respectively (Table 5). The dry season mean streamflow is projected to increase in the watershed by 5.46 and 4.57% from baseline flow in the near-term while, in the mid-term dry season, mean streamflow is expected to increase by 5.41 and 3.16% from the baseline streamflow under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios, respectively.

Table 5

Mean annual and seasonal change of flow under RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios for climate change only from baseline period

ScenariosSimulated streamflow in (m3/s)
% change of streamflow
RCP4.5
RCP8.5
RCP4.5
RCP8.5
Near-termMid-termNear-termMid-termNear-termMid-termNear-termMid-term
Annual 625.46 629.06 614.61 616.40 7.63 8.25 5.76 6.07 
Wet season 452.34 456.03 442.97 447.07 8.48 9.36 6.23 7.21 
Dry season 173.11 173.03 171.65 169.33 5.46 5.41 4.57 3.16 
ScenariosSimulated streamflow in (m3/s)
% change of streamflow
RCP4.5
RCP8.5
RCP4.5
RCP8.5
Near-termMid-termNear-termMid-termNear-termMid-termNear-termMid-term
Annual 625.46 629.06 614.61 616.40 7.63 8.25 5.76 6.07 
Wet season 452.34 456.03 442.97 447.07 8.48 9.36 6.23 7.21 
Dry season 173.11 173.03 171.65 169.33 5.46 5.41 4.57 3.16 

The simulated mean annual streamflow may rise by 7.63 and 8.25%, near- and mid-term period, respectively, under the RCP4.5. Similarly, the mean annual streamflow increased by 5.76 and 6.07%, respectively, under RCP8.5 scenarios.

The projected increase in streamflows into the watershed is in agreement with other studies that reported how mean annual streamflow consistently increased in line with the predicted changes in rainfall and temperature patterns in the future period 2021–2080 under the RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5 emission scenarios of Genale watershed (Negewo & Sarma 2021). The study of Gragn et al. (2019) indicated that the average annual, seasonal and monthly flow volume is observed to increase between the 2018 and 2077 period corresponding to an increase in mean annual, seasonal and monthly precipitation during the future scenario of the Awata river watershed, Genale Dawa Basin. Similarly, Anwar et al. (2016) from a study in the Upper Gilgel Abay Watershed, Blue Nile basin concluded that streamflow projections for future periods will likely increase.

Generally, the annual and seasonal streamflow changes are expected to increase in all future periods in Yadot watershed under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios.

The changes in precipitation and temperature influence streamflow patterns. The correlation between precipitation and the streamflow is positive, while the relationship between the temperature and hydrological process is positive with regard to potential evapotranspiration. Although there is a general tendency toward increasing maximum and minimum temperature, the overall increase in annual and seasonal rainfall contributed more to the seasonal and annual streamflow increase. This implies that the increase in streamflows due to increased precipitation is not counter balanced by the increased evapotranspiration from the warming temperature trend. This indicates that streamflow is more highly sensitive to precipitation change than to change in potential evapotranspiration resulting from temperature increase (Yira et al. 2017; Daniel & Abate 2022; Idrissou et al. 2022).

The study implied that the projected increase in streamflows due to the impact of climate change could lead to increased sediment yield, which could have negative impacts on water quality and aquatic ecosystems downstream. Additionally, the overall projected streamflow increase, in combination with projected increased precipitation within the watershed, may cause flooding in the region. Generally, in the future, floods and extreme precipitation are expected to intensify in response to global warming (Tabari 2020).

Thus, understanding how streamflow is affected by climate change is crucial to inform adaptive land and water management for policymakers and help to improve future decision-making on water resources. This information can help stakeholders develop and prioritize management strategies that are better suited to the changing hydrological conditions. Therefore, the projected streamflow during annual, wet and dry seasons affects not only the livelihood of people residing in the Bale highlands but also all inhabitants in the downstream areas whose life depends on the flow of the Yadot River. Thus, to mitigate the adverse effects of the projected increase in streamflows, appropriate physical and biological soil and water conservation measures are highly recommended to protect against flooding, soil erosion, and downstream sedimentation in the region.

The study assessed the influence of climate change on streamflow in the Yadot River watershed Genale Dawa basin, Ethiopia, for the near-term (2021–2050) and mid-term (2051–2080) future periods under the RCP 4.5 and. RCP 8.5 emission scenarios. The SUFI-2 algorithm approach in the SWAT-CUP tool was utilized to parameterize the SWAT hydrological model, which was used to simulate streamflow. For streamflow, the uncertainty analysis, calibration (1988–2002), and validation (2003–2008) processes were all successful. CANMX, SCS runoff curve number (CN2), saturation hydraulic conductivity (SOL K), and soil ESCO were discovered to be the most sensitive parameters for streamflow predictions using the sensitivity analysis. The study used the ensemble mean of three RCM outcomes, which were bias-corrected in the CORDEX-RCM.

According to this study, the projected monthly precipitation did not indicate a clear pattern of change in the Genale Dawa basin, whereas the projected wet and dry season precipitation is likely to increase during the near- and mid-term periods under medium and high emission scenarios in the study area. The change in precipitation was higher during the mid-term period (2050–2080) under the high emission scenario (RCP8.5) than other periods and emission scenarios.

The projected maximum temperature increased on both dry and wet seasons during the near- and mid-term periods under both medium and high emission scenarios. The change in projected maximum temperature was highest (almost reaches 2 °C) in the dry season during the mid-term period under a high emission scenario. The mid-term period under the high emission scenario, generally, showed the highest magnitude projected maximum temperature increase than near-term and medium emission scenarios during both seasons. Generally, the change in projected maximum temperature will be higher during the dry season than the wet season during both periods and scenarios, i.e. the dry season will be getting warmer than the wet season. Overall, during the near-term and mid-term periods the study region will be getting warmer. The projected seasonal minimum temperature showed a consistent increase during both seasons. The change in projected annual maximum and minimum temperature showed a consistent increase in the near- and mid-term period under both scenarios with a higher rate of increase toward the end of the century.

The projected annual and seasonal changes of streamflow indicated the likely increase during both near- and mid-term periods under both scenarios (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) in the Yadot watershed. The expected increase in the projected rainfall and a consistent projected warming will further increase the streamflow in the study area. Thus, increased streamflow expected from heavy rainfall will become more common and more intense due to higher temperatures, with floods expected to become more frequent in the region. The prediction of future hydrological scenarios will be useful in the development and implementation of effective watershed management mitigation strategies in the near and far future.

The authors are grateful to the Ethiopian Ministry of Water, Irrigation, and Electricity, the Department of Hydrology, and the Ethiopian National Meteorological Agency for supplying streamflow and meteorological data from the Yadot River Watershed, Genale Dawa Basin. We are also grateful to the Ministry of Agriculture for supporting the research financially.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Abdulahia
S. D.
,
Abate
B.
,
Harka
A. E.
&
Husen
S. B.
2022
Response of climate change impact on streamflow: The case of the Upper Awash sub-basin, Ethiopia
.
Journal of Water and Climate Change
13
(
2
),
607
628
.
doi:10.2166/wcc.2021.251
.
Abraham
T.
,
Abate
B.
,
Woldemicheal
A.
&
Muluneh
A.
2018
Impacts of climate change under CMIP5 RCP scenarios on the hydrology of Lake Ziway catchment, central rift valley of Ethiopia
.
Journal of Environment and Earth Science
8
(
7
),
2224
3216
.
Available from: www.iiste.org. ISSN ISSN 2225-0948
.
Admassie
A.
&
Abebaw
D.
2021
Ethiopia-land, climate, energy, agriculture and development: A study in the sudano-sahel initiative for regional development, jobs, and food security, in ZEF Working Paper Series, ISSN 1864-6638, Center for Development Research, University of Bonn, January 2021. SSRN. Available from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3769102.
Anaraki
M. V.
,
Farzin
S.
,
Mousavi
S.-F.
&
Karami
H.
2021
Uncertainty analysis of climate change impacts on flood frequency by using hybrid machine learning methods
.
Water Resour. Manag.
35
,
199
223
.
doi:10.1007/s11269-020-02719-w
.
Anaraki
M. V.
,
Achite
M.
,
Farzin
S.
,
Elshaboury
N.
,
Al-Ansari
N.
&
Elkhrachy
I.
2023
Modeling of monthly rainfall–runoff using various machine learning techniques in Wadi Ouahrane Basin, Algeria
.
Water
15
,
3576
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w15203576
.
Anwar
A.
,
Seifu
A.
,
Essayas
K.
,
Abeyou
W.
,
Tewodros
T.
,
Shimelis
B.
&
Assefa
M.
2016
Climate change impact on streamflow in the upper Gilgel Abay Catchment, Blue Nile 95 Basin, Ethiopia
. In:
Landscape Dynamics, Soils and Hydrological Processes in Varied Climatesm
(Melesse, A. M. & Abtew, W., eds.).
Springer
,
Cham
, pp.
645
673
.
Arnold
J. G.
&
Fohrer
N.
2005
SWAT 2000. Current capabilities and research opportunities in applied watershed modelling
.
Hydrol. Process.
19
,
563
572
.
doi:10.1002/hyp.5611
.
Arnold
J. G.
,
Srinivasan
R.
,
Muttiah
R. S.
&
Williams
J. R.
1998
Large-area hydrologic modeling and assessment: Part I. Model development
.
J. American Water Resour. Assoc
34
,
73
89
.
doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
.
Arnold
J. G.
,
Moriasi
D. N.
,
Gassman
P. W.
,
Abbaspour
K. C.
,
White
M. J.
,
Srinivasan
R.
,
Santhi
C.
,
Harmel
R. D.
,
Van Griensven
A.
,
Van Liew
M. W.
&
Kannan
N.
2012
SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation
.
Transactions of the ASABE
55
(
4
),
1491
1508
.
doi:10.13031/2013.42256
.
Azari
M.
,
Moradi
H. R.
,
Saghafian
B.
&
Faramarzi
M.
2016
Climate change impacts on streamflow and sediment yield in the North of Iran
.
Hydrological Sciences Journal
61
,
123
133
.
doi:10.1080/02626667.2014.967695
.
Bekele
W. T.
,
Haile
A. T.
&
Rientjes
T.
2021
Impact of climate change on the streamflow of the Arjo-Didessa catchment under RCP scenarios
.
J. Water Clim. Change.
12
,
1
13
.
doi:10.2166/wcc.2021.307
.
Beyene
S. K.
,
Kemal
A.
&
Pingale
S. M.
2018
Impact of land use/land cover change on watershed hydrology: A case study of Upper Awash Basin, Ethiopia
.
Ethiopian Journal of Water Science and Technology
1
,
4
27
.
doi:10.59122/13529D1
.
Boko
B. A.
,
Konaté
M.
,
Yalo
N.
,
Berg
S. J.
,
Erler
A. R.
,
Bazié
P.
&
Sudicky
E. A.
2020
High-resolution, integrated hydrological modeling of climate change impacts on a semi-arid urban watershed in Niamey, Niger
.
Water
12
(
2
),
364
.
doi:10.3390/w12020364
.
Boru
G. F.
,
Gonfa
Z. B.
&
Diga
G. M.
2019
Impacts of climate change on stream flow and water availability in Anger sub-basin, Nile Basin of Ethiopia
.
Sustainable Water Resources Management
5
,
1755
1764
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-019-00327-0
.
Chakilu
G. G.
,
Sándor
S.
,
Zoltán
T.
&
Phinzi
K.
2022
Climate change and the response of streamflow of watersheds under the high emission scenario in Lake Tana sub-basin, upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia
.
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
42
,
101175
.
doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101175
.
Cheng
L.
,
Zhang
L.
,
Wang
Y.-P.
,
Canadell
J. G.
,
Chiew
F. H. S.
,
Beringer
J.
&
Zhang
Y.
2017
Recent increases in terrestrial carbon uptake at little cost to the water cycle
.
Nature Communications
8
(
1
),
110
.
doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00114-5
.
Christensen
J. H.
,
Krishna Kumar
K.
,
Aldrian
E.
,
An S-I
I. F. A. C.
,
de Castro
M.
,
Dong
W.
,
Goswami
P.
,
Hall
A.
,
Kanyanga
J. K.
,
Kitoh
A.
,
Kossin
J.
,
Lau
N.-C.
,
Renwick
J.
,
Stephenson
D. B.
,
Xie
S.-P.
,
Zhou
T.
,
2013
Climate phenomena and their relevance for future regional climate change
. In:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(
Stocker
T. F.
,
Qin
D.
,
Plattner
G.-K.
,
Tignor
M.
,
Allen
S. K.
,
Boschung
J.
,
Nauels
A.
,
Xia
Y.
,
Bex
V.
&
Midgley
P. M.
, eds.).
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
and New York, NY
.
Dai
A.
,
Zhao
T.
&
Chen
J.
2018
Climate change and drought: A precipitation and evaporation perspective
.
Curr. Clim. Change Rep
4
,
301
312
.
doi:10.1007/s40641-018-0101-6
.
Daniel
H.
&
Abate
B.
2022
Effect of climate change on streamflow in the Gelana watershed, Rift valley basin, Ethiopia
.
Journal of Water and Climate Change
13
(
5
),
2205
2232
.
doi:10.2166/wcc.2022.059
.
Edamo
M. L.
,
Bushira
K. M.
,
Ukumo
T. Y.
,
Ayele
M. A.
,
Alaro
M. A.
&
Borko
H. B.
2022
Effect of climate change on water availability in Bilate catchment, Southern Ethiopia
.
Water Cycle
3
,
86
99
.
doi:10.1016/j.watcyc.2022.06.001
.
Endris
H. S.
,
Omondi
P.
,
Jain
S.
,
Lennard
C.
,
Hewitson
B.
,
Chang'a
L.
&
Tazalika
L.
2013
Assessment of the performance of CORDEX regional climate models in simulating East African rainfall
.
Journal of Climate
26
(
21
),
8453
8475
.
Feng
S.
,
Hu
Q.
,
Huang
W.
,
Ho
C.-H.
,
Li
R.
&
Tang
Z.
2014
Projected climate regime shift under future global warming from multi-model, multi-scenario CMIP5 simulations
.
Global and Planetary Change
112
,
41
52
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2013.11.002
.
Fentaw
F.
,
Hailu
D.
,
Nigussie
A.
&
Melesse
A. M.
2018
Climate change impact on the hydrology of Tekeze Basin, Ethiopia: Projection of rainfall-runoff for future water resources planning
.
Water Conserv. Sci. Eng.
3
(
2018
),
267
278
.
10.1007/s41101-018-0057-3
.
Gashaw
T.
&
Mahari
A.
2014
Present and future prospects of climate change and agricultural productivity in Ethiopia: review
.
Journal of Biology, Agriculture and Healthcare
4
(
15
),
70
74
.
Gebrechorkos
S. H.
,
Taye
M. T.
,
Birhanu
B.
,
Solomon
D.
&
Demissie
T.
2023
Future changes in climate and hydroclimate extremes in East Africa
.
Earth's Future
11
(
2
),
e2022EF003011
.
doi:10.1029/2022EF003011
.
Gebremichael
T. G.
,
Mohamed
Y. A.
,
Betrie
G. D.
,
Van der Zaag
P.
&
Teferi
E.
2013
Trend analysis of runoff and sediment fluxes in the Upper Blue Nile basin: A combined analysis of statistical tests, physically based models and landuse maps
.
J. Hydrol.
482
(
2013
),
57
68
.
doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.023
.
Givati
A.
,
Thirel
G.
,
Rosenfeld
D.
&
Paz
D.
2019
Climate change impacts on streamflow at the upper Jordan River based on an ensemble of regional climate models
.
J. Hydrol. Reg. Stud.
21
,
92
109
.
doi:10.1016/j.ejrh.2018.12.004
.
Gizaw
M. S.
,
Biftu
G. F.
,
Gan
T. Y.
,
Moges
S. A.
&
Koivusalo
H.
2017
Potential impact of climate change on streamflow of major Ethiopian rivers
.
Climatic Change
143
,
371
383
.
doi:10.1007/s10584-017-2021-1
.
Gragn
T.
,
Kebede
A.
&
Berhanu
S.
2019
Evaluation of climate change impacts on the water resources of Awata River Watershed, Genale Dawa Basin: Southern Ethiopia
.
Acad. Res. J. Agri. Sci. Res
7
,
414
422
.
Gurara
M. A.
,
Jilo
N. B.
&
Tolche
A. D.
2023
Modelling climate change impact on the streamflow in the Upper Wabe Bridge watershed in Wabe Shebele River Basin, Ethiopia
.
International Journal of River Basin Management
21
,
181
193
.
doi:10.1080/15715124.2021.1935978
.
Hirpa
F. A.
,
Alfieri
L.
,
Lees
T.
,
Peng
J.
,
Dyer
E.
&
Simon
J.
2019
Streamflow response to climate change in the Greater Horn of Africa
.
Clim. Change
156
,
341
363
.
doi:10.1007/s10584-019-02547-x
.
Idrissou
M.
,
Diekkrüger
B.
,
Tischbein
B.
,
Op de Hipt
F.
,
Näschen
K.
,
Poméon
T.
&
Ibrahim
B.
2022
Modeling the impact of climate and land use/land cover change on water availability in an inland valley catchment in Burkina Faso
.
Hydrology
9
(
1
),
12
.
doi:10.3390/hydrology9010012
.
IPCC
2013
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
.
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK and New York, NY
.
IPCC
2014
Climate Change 2014 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability: Part B: Regional Aspects: Working Group II Contribution to the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report: Volume 2: Regional Aspects
.
Cambridge University Press
.
https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415386
.
IPCC
2021
Summary for Policymakers
. In:
Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(
Masson-Delmotte
V.
,
Zhai
P.
,
Pirani
A.
,
Connors
S. L.
,
Péan
C.
,
Berger
S.
,
Caud
N.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Goldfarb
L.
,
Gomis
M. I.
,
Huang
M.
,
Leitzell
K.
,
Lonnoy
E.
,
Matthews
J. B. R.
,
Maycock
T. K.
,
Waterfield
T.
,
Yelekçi
O.
,
Yu
R.
&
Zhou
B.
, eds.).
Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
,
UK and New York, NY
.
IPCC
2022
Climate Change 2022 – Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844
.
Ismail
M.
,
Ahmed
E.
,
Peng
G.
,
Xu
R.
,
Sultan
M.
,
Khan
F. U.
&
Aleem
M.
2022
Evaluating the impact of climate change on the stream flow in Soan River Basin (Pakistan)
.
Water
14
(
22
),
3695
.
doi:10.3390/w14223695
.
Kamruzzaman
M.
,
Shahid
S.
,
Roy
D. K.
,
Islam
A. R. T.
,
Hwang
S.
,
Cho
J.
,
Zaman
M. A. U.
,
Sultana
T.
,
Rashid
T.
&
Akter
F.
2021
Assessment of CMIP6 global climate models in reconstructing rainfall climatology of Bangladesh
.
International Journal of Climatology
42
(
7
),
3928
3953
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7452
.
Khan
N.
,
Shahid
S.
,
Ahmed
K.
,
Ismail
T.
,
Nawaz
N.
&
Son
M.
2018
Performance assessment of general circulation model in simulating daily precipitation and temperature using multiple gridded datasets
.
Water
10
(
12
),
1793
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w10121793
.
Lafon
T.
,
Dadson
S.
,
Buys
G.
&
Prudhomme
C.
2013
Bias correction of daily precipitation simulated by a regional climate model: A comparison of methods
.
International Journal of Climatology
33
(
6
),
1367
1381
.
doi:10.1002/joc.3518
.
Lennard
C. J.
,
Nikulin
G.
,
Dosio
A.
&
Moufouma-Okia
W.
2018
On the need for regional climate information over Africa under varying levels of global warming
.
Environmental Research Letters
13
(
6
),
060401
.
doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aab2b4
.
Lotfirad
M.
,
Adib
A.
,
Salehpoor
J.
,
Ashrafzadeh
A.
&
Kisi
O.
2021
Simulation of the impact of climate change on runoff and drought in an arid and semiarid basin (the Hablehroud, Iran)
.
Applied Water Science
11
,
1
24
.
doi:10.1007/s13201-021-01494-2
.
Lotfirad
M.
,
Adib
A.
,
Riyahi
M. M.
&
Jafarpour
M.
2023
Evaluating the effect of the uncertainty of CMIP6 models on extreme flows of the Caspian Hyrcanian forest watersheds using the BMA method
.
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
37
(
2
),
491
505
.
doi:10.1007/s00477-022-02269-0
.
Luo
L.
,
Apps
D.
,
Arcand
S.
,
Xu
H.
,
Pan
M.
&
Hoerling
M.
2017
Contribution of temperature and precipitation anomalies to the California drought during 2012–2015
.
Geophys. Res. Lett.
44
,
3184
3192
.
doi:10.1002/2016GL072027
.
Malik
M. A.
,
Dar
A. Q.
&
Jain
M. K.
2022
Modelling streamflow using the SWAT model and multi-site calibration utilizing SUFI-2 of SWAT-CUP model for high altitude catchments, NW Himalaya's
.
Model. Earth Syst. Environ.
8
,
1203
1213
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-021-01145-0
.
Muleta
L.
2017
Impact of Climate Change on Water Availability in Genale River Bubbasin, Southeastern Ethiopia
.
Doctoral dissertation
,
Haramaya University
,
Haramaya
.
Negewo
T. F.
&
Sarma
A. K.
2021
Estimation of water yield under baseline and future climate change scenarios in Genale Watershed, Genale Dawa River Basin, Ethiopia, using SWAT model
.
Journal of Hydrologic Engineering
26
(
3
),
05020051
.
doi:10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0002047
.
Neitsch
S. L.
,
Arnold
J. G.
,
Kiniry
J. R.
&
Williams
J. R.
2011
Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009
.
Texas Water Resources Institute
,
College Station, TX
.
Nguyen
Q.
,
Shrestha
S.
,
Ghimire
S.
,
Sundaram
S. M.
,
Xue
W.
,
Virdis
S. G.
&
Maharjan
M.
2023
Application of machine learning models in assessing the hydrological changes under climate change in the transboundary 3S River Basin
.
Journal of Water and Climate Change
14
(
8
),
2902
2918
.
doi:10.2166/wcc.2023.313
.
Ongoma
V.
,
Chen
H.
&
Gao
C.
2018
Projected changes in mean rainfall and temperature over East Africa based on CMIP5 models
.
International Journal of Climatology
38
(
3
),
1375
1392
.
doi:10.1002/joc.5252
.
Orkodjo
T. P.
,
Kranjac-Berisavijevic
G.
&
Abagale
F. K.
2022
Impact of climate change on future precipitation amounts, seasonal distribution, and streamflow in the Omo-Gibe basin, Ethiopia
.
Heliyon
8
(
6
).
doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e09711
.
Reshma
C.
&
Arunkumar
R.
2023
Assessment of impact of climate change on the streamflow of Idamalayar River Basin, Kerala
.
Journal of Water and Climate Change
14
(
7
),
2133
2149
.
doi:10.2166/wcc.2023.456
.
Salman
S. A.
,
Shahid
S.
,
Ismail
T.
,
Ahmed
K.
&
Wang
X.-J.
2018
Selection of climate models for projection of spatiotemporal changes in temperature of Iraq with uncertainties
.
Atmospheric Research
213
,
509
522
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2018.07.008
.
Sanjay Shekar
N. C.
&
Vinay
D. C.
2021
Performance of HEC-HMS and SWAT to simulate streamflow in the sub-humid tropical Hemavathi catchment
.
Journal of Water and Climate Change
12
(
7
),
3005
3017
.
doi:10.2166/wcc.2021.072
.
Serdeczny
O.
,
Adams
S.
,
Baarsch
F.
,
Coumou
D.
,
Robinson
A.
,
Hare
W.
&
Reinhardt
J.
2017
Climate change impacts in Sub-Saharan Africa: From physical changes to their social repercussions
.
Regional Environmental Change
17
,
1585
1600
.
doi:10.1007/s10113-015-0910-2
.
Sesana
E.
,
Bertolin
C.
,
Gagnon
A. S.
&
Hughes
J. J.
2019
Mitigating climate change in the cultural built heritage sector
.
Climate
7
(
7
),
90
.
doi:10.3390/cli7070090
.
Seyoum
M.
,
Fana
G.
,
Gan
T. Y.
,
Ayalew
S.
&
Koivusalo
H.
2017
Potential impact of climate change on streamflow of major Ethiopian rivers
.
Climatic Change
143
(
3
),
371
383
.
Shokouhifar
Y.
,
Lotfirad
M.
,
Esmaeili-Gisavandani
H.
&
Adib
A.
2022
Evaluation of climate change effects on flood frequency in arid and semi-arid basins
.
Water Supply
22
(
8
),
6740
6755
.
doi:10.2166/ws.2022.271
.
Shongwe
M. E.
,
van Oldenborgh
G. J.
,
van den Hurk
B.
&
van Aalst
M.
2011
Projected changes in mean and extreme precipitation in Africa under global warming. Part II: East Africa
.
J. Clim.
24
,
3718
3733
.
doi:10.1175/2010JCLI2883.1
.
Tarekegn
N.
,
Abate
B.
,
Muluneh
A.
&
Dile
Y.
2021
Modeling the impact of climate change on the hydrology of Andasa watershed
.
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-020-01063-7
.
Tessema
N.
,
Kebede
A.
&
Yadeta
D.
2021
Modelling the effects of climate change on streamflow using climate and hydrological models: The case of the Kesem sub-basin of the Awash River basin, Ethiopia
.
International Journal of River Basin Management
19
,
469
480
.
doi:10.1080/15715124.2020.1755301
.
Teutschbein
C.
&
Seibert
J.
2012
Bias correction of regional climate model simulations for hydrological climate-change impact studies: Review and evaluation of different methods
.
Journal of Hydrology
456
,
12
29
.
doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.05.052
.
Tierney
J. E.
,
Ummenhofer
C. C.
&
deMenocal
P. B.
2015
Past and future rainfall in the Horn of Africa
.
Sci. Adv.
1
,
e1500682
.
https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1500682
.
Trisos
C. H.
,
Adelekan
I. O.
,
Totin
E.
,
Ayanlade
A.
,
Efitre
J.
,
Gemeda
A.
,
Kalaba
K.
,
Lennard
C.
,
Masao
C.
,
Mgaya
Y.
,
Ngaruiya
G.
,
Olago
D.
,
Simpson
N. P.
,
Zakieldeen
S.
,
2022
Africa
. In:
Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(
Pörtner
H.-O.
,
Roberts
D. C.
,
Tignor
M.
,
Poloczanska
E. S.
,
Mintenbeck
K.
,
Alegría
A.
,
Craig
M.
,
Langsdorf
S.
,
Löschke
S.
,
Möller
V.
,
Okem
A.
&
Rama
B.
, eds.).
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
, pp.
1285
1455
.
https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009325844.011
.
Vogeti
R. K.
,
Raju
K. S.
,
Nagesh Kumar
D.
,
Rajesh
A. M.
,
Somanath Kumar
S. V.
&
Jha
Y. S. K.
2023
Application of hydrological models in climate change framework for a river basin in India
.
Journal of Water and Climate Change
14
(
9
),
3150
3165
.
doi:10.2166/wcc.2023.188
.
Worqlul
A. W.
,
Dile
Y. T.
,
Ayana
E. K.
,
Jeong
J.
,
Adem
A. A.
&
Gerik
T.
2018
Impact of climate change on streamflow hydrology in headwater catchments of the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia
.
Water
10
(
2
),
120
.
doi:10.3390/w10020120
.
Yang
L.
,
Feng
Q.
,
Yin
Z.
,
Wen
X.
,
Si
J.
,
Li
C.
&
Deo
R. C.
2017
Identifying separate impacts of climate and land use/cover change on hydrological processes in upper stream of Heihe River, Northwest China
.
Hydrological Processes
31
(
5
),
1100
1112
.
doi:10.1002/hyp.11098
.
Yira
Y.
,
Diekkrüger
B.
,
Steup
G.
&
Bossa
A. Y.
2017
Impact of climate change on hydrological conditions in a tropical West African catchment using an ensemble of climate simulations
.
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
21
(
4
),
2143
2161
.
doi:10.5194/hess-21-2143-2017
.
Zuo
C.
,
Huang
L.
,
Zhang
M.
,
Chen
Q.
&
Asundi
A.
2016
Temporal phase unwrapping algorithms for fringe projection profilometry: A comparative review
.
Optics and Lasers in Engineering
85
,
84
103
.
doi:10.1016/j.optlaseng.2016.04.022
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).