Onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS) are a common wastewater treatment approach in coastal communities. Vertical separation distance (VSD) requirements between the drainfield and groundwater aim to ensure aerated soils for wastewater treatment. When the VSD declines, OWTS can fail. This study evaluated groundwater response to sea level rise (SLR) and the implications for OWTS. A groundwater monitoring network (13 wells) was used to evaluate groundwater depth in Dare County, North Carolina. Groundwater levels were measured with water level meters and pressure transducers. Trends in groundwater depth and SLR were analyzed to evaluate the influence of SLR on groundwater depth. From 1984–2022, mean groundwater levels have risen (∼7.6 mm/year) in response to SLR. Currently, sites at <2.7 m land elevation are most likely to have groundwater depths <1 m and inadequate VSD. Based on current precipitation and NOAA intermediate SLR projections, groundwater depth projections suggest that OWTS at lower elevations are more likely to experience groundwater inundation by 2040–2060. SLR has resulted in reduced VSD causing diminished wastewater treatment capacity in low-lying areas. OWTS VSD requirements are typically static due to regulatory constraints. Future management approaches should consider adapting to rising coastal groundwater levels because of increasing wastewater contamination risks.

  • Sea level rise along the North Carolina coast has led to rising groundwater levels.

  • Rising groundwater levels can compromise onsite wastewater treatment.

  • Large precipitation events can temporarily reduce the effectiveness of septic systems for weeks to months.

  • Regulatory approaches should consider the effects of rising groundwater levels on onsite wastewater infrastructure.

Sea level rise (SLR) and coastal storms can cause increased flooding and land loss, saltwater intrusion (surface and subsurface), wetland loss/change, flooding, and impacts to local infrastructure. These changes can impact the resilience of coastal communities. Globally, sea level is projected to rise between 0.32 and 1.01 m by 2100 due to the thermal expansion of ocean waters and the conversion of land ice to water, based on low-very high greenhouse gas emissions scenarios (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Shared Socioeconomic Pathways: SSP1-2.6–SSP5-8.5, Fox-Kemper et al. 2021). Spatial variations in local SLR occur due to variations in ocean currents and local factors such as subsidence and sediment delivery (Fox-Kemper et al. 2021). At the Duck, NC National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) tidal gage in Dare Co, relative local SLR from 1978 to 2022 is estimated at approximately 4.88 mm/year (±0.56 mm/year) (NOAA 2024), faster than the global mean SLR rate of approximately 1.9 mm/year from 1971 to 2006 (Fox-Kemper et al. 2021). Along the Atlantic Coast of the United States, the southern coast of Virginia and the northern coast of North Carolina (NC) are experiencing some of the highest rates of relative SLR along the Atlantic Seaboard (Piecuch et al. 2018). This region is vulnerable due to higher rates of subsidence than other regions along the Atlantic Coast, with rates ranging from 1 to 3 mm/year (Karegar et al. 2016). The higher subsidence rates have been attributed to post-glacial settling and groundwater abstraction (Johnston et al. 2021). Recent relative SLR rates appear to be accelerating (NC CRC 2010; Ezer & Atkinson 2015; Piecuch et al. 2018; NOAA 2024), however there is uncertainty in future projections associated with potential changes in greenhouse gas emissions, ice sheet processes, ocean currents, subsidence, and other variables (Fox-Kemper et al. 2021).

SLR has led to increased duration and frequency of ‘nuisance’ or sunny-day flooding (temporary inundation of low-lying areas due to high tides) within many of NC's and Virginia's coastal cities and conditions are likely to worsen with additional SLR (Sweet et al. 2014). For coastal areas, it is expected that groundwater levels will rise in response to increasing sea level causing an increase in the occurrence of groundwater inundation (Manda et al. 2015). Low-lying coastal areas, such as within NC, are naturally flood-prone due to shallow water tables, flat topography, and the common occurrence of tropical cyclones. In particular, the risk of flooding appears to be rising as the number of catastrophic tropical storm flooding events has increased along the NC coast since the late 1990s (Paerl et al. 2019; Kunkel et al. 2020). More broadly, recent work by Knutson et al. (2020) suggests that SLR combined with response of tropical cyclones to anthropogenic warming will increase coastal flood risks. It is estimated by the year 2100 that approximately 163 thousand–300 thousand citizens in NC would be directly affected by inundation associated with SLR, based on a NOAA digital elevation model used to simulate expected 0.3 m increment changes in the mean higher high water (MHHW) mark, up to 1.8 m (Hauer et al. 2016). These changes will have a large impact on coastal communities and their infrastructure.

Functioning wastewater infrastructure is critical to public and environmental health and the resilience of coastal communities. Recent work has begun to address the vulnerability of municipal wastewater infrastructure in coastal NC to SLR (Allen et al. 2018; Hummel et al. 2018). These studies observed trends of increasing magnitude, frequency, and impact of flood events on wastewater infrastructure with SLR. Although these studies indicate that climate change will impact above ground wastewater infrastructure, less work has focused on buried wastewater infrastructure, such as onsite wastewater treatment systems (OWTS). Conventional OWTS, also referred to as septic systems, require unsaturated soils for effective wastewater treatment.

Like many coastal regions, eastern NC is heavily reliant on OWTS. For example, it is estimated that for the watersheds draining to coastal NC, over 50% of the population relies on onsite wastewater treatment (Pradhan 2004). Although OWTS are utilized at most residences, limited work has focused on the effects of climate change on onsite wastewater infrastructure. Inadequate onsite wastewater treatment associated with chronic or acute coastal flooding can lead to surface water and shellfish contamination by bacteria and viruses and increased nutrient loading that can promote harmful algal blooms and fish kills (Cahoon et al. 2016; Lapointe et al. 2017). Flooding of decentralized systems can cause acute problems, such as wastewater discharging to the surface, backing up in homes, and inundating OWTS electrical systems. In addition, the chronic problem of rising sea level and groundwater levels can lead to lack of wastewater treatment, poor drainage, surfacing wastewater, saltwater intrusion, reduced setback distance to surface waters, and reduced vertical separation distance (VSD).

One aspect of OWTS that is most likely to be affected by rising sea level and associated groundwater table rise is the VSD, the depth of unsaturated soil that exists between the OWTS drainfield trenches and the water table (or a restrictive soil layer). The VSD is an important factor influencing reduction of environmental pollutants found in septic tank effluent. An adequate VSD is needed to ensure the degradation of organics, removal of bacteria and viruses, and nitrification. Field and column studies have shown that when the VSD is less than 60 cm, there is a reduction in bacteria treatment (Karathanasis et al. 2006a; Stall et al. 2014; Humphrey et al. 2015), nitrification (Karathanasis et al. 2006b; O'Driscoll et al. 2014; Cooper et al. 2016; Humphrey et al. 2017; Al-Atrash et al. 2023), and treatment and retention of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (Del Rosario et al. 2014). To protect the groundwater quality from onsite wastewater impacts, a minimum VSD between the bottom of the drainfield and the groundwater table is required to ensure an adequate thickness of unsaturated soil for treatment. Current regulatory approaches in the U.S. provide a VSD requirement for installation of a system, typically based on the seasonal high-water table. The VSD regulations vary for states and municipalities across the U.S., most states require >60 cm VSD; however, North and South Carolina have lower VSD requirements ranging from 15 cm (South Carolina) to 30 (loam, clay, and silt soils) and 45 cm (sandy soils) (NC) (NC DHHS 2017; Henneman 2020; SC DHEC 2023). In coastal communities, where rising sea level results in rising groundwater levels, the VSD may decline over time, resulting in reduced capacity for onsite wastewater treatment. Based on shallow water tables and the rate of SLR in the region, it was hypothesized that changes in groundwater depth related to SLR and coastal storms would have negative influences on VSD over time. The current study evaluated the influence of SLR and extreme precipitation events on changing water table conditions in coastal Dare County, NC, and the implications for onsite wastewater treatment.

Dare County is in northeastern NC along the Atlantic Ocean and the Albemarle-Pamlico Sound. The county extends from the mainland and includes Roanoke Island, bordered by the Sound, and the barrier island system, also known as the Outer Banks. Tourism plays a major role in the County's economy, as the Outer Banks is a popular resort and vacation area. Dare County had a permanent population of approximately 38,000 in 2022 (US Census Bureau 2023). However, tourism results in a large seasonal population increase which can be almost an order of magnitude larger (225–300 K from June to August) during the summer tourist season (Dare County 2023). The region receives approximately 127 cm of rainfall per year (1984–2022), with an annual average air temperature of 15.8 °C (NOAA-NCEI 2023). Although rainfall is somewhat evenly distributed throughout the year, annual and seasonal variability in precipitation amount can occur due to tropical storms. Evapotranspiration in the region is approximately 74% (∼100 cm/year) of annual precipitation and is at a maximum in the summer months (Sun et al. 2002).

Dare County is located within the tidewater region (Outer Coastal Plain) of the NC Coastal Plain. The region is characterized by low relief and extensive wetlands. Land surface elevation is typically below 4 m, except for sand dunes along the Outer Banks, the highest elevation being at Jockey's Ridge (28 m above sea level). Surface waters are affected by wind and lunar tides across the region, and the tidal fluctuations are greater along the Atlantic Ocean coast relative to the estuarine coastline. The land surface is a broad, eastward dipping plain that contains a series of Pleistocene marine terraces. The geology consists of sediments and sedimentary rocks that generally dip and thicken to the southeast (recent to Cretaceous age) (Lautier 2009). At the surface, the surficial aquifer can range in thickness from 0 to ∼40 m. The depth to the water table in the surficial aquifer across the County is typically less than 4 m and is deepest underlying the dunes along the Outer Banks. The surficial aquifer typically consists of sandy sediments, shell and clay beds, and peat deposits. Underneath the surficial aquifer, a confining unit is commonly observed (Yorktown confining unit). This unit is composed of silt and clay beds that can range from 2 to 30 m. Beneath the confining unit, the Yorktown aquifer is composed of beds of fine medium grained sands including some shelly material, interspersed with layers of clay (Lautier 2009). Since around the 1980s, the County has experienced substantial population growth and increased tourism (particularly for the Outer Banks region) that has resulted in increasing demands on groundwater as a source of public water supply (USGS 2023), particularly in the summer months. The Yorktown aquifer system is the dominant source of potable water for the County. The Dare County Water Department provides water to most of the County, typically utilizing groundwater from the Yorktown aquifer and in cases where the water has elevated salinity, Reverse Osmosis is used to treat the brackish groundwater. Overall, the network of public water supply wells can provide up to 15 million gallons per day (MGD) (Dare County Water Department 2023).

The NC Department of Environmental Quality (NC DEQ) developed a network of groundwater monitoring wells in Dare Co. (NC DEQ 2023a) with the earliest data collection beginning in 1983–1984. Eight groundwater monitoring sites are in operation in Dare Co, NC (Table 1) with wells screened in the surficial aquifer (Figure 1). Surficial aquifer well depths ranged from 3.0 to 7.2 m (Table 1). Initial groundwater monitoring in the 1980s typically occurred at bi-monthly frequency. When pressure transducers were installed beginning in 2003, daily groundwater level data became available (Table 1). Most sites had daily data from 2012 to 2022 (except Stumpy Point (SP)). Five additional groundwater wells were instrumented for this project adjacent to OWTS in 2019–2020. These sites were located at the Bonnett Street Beach Access, Dowdy Park, the Nags Head Municipal Complex, a residential site in South Nags Head (SNH), and an additional NC DEQ groundwater monitoring well at the Coastal Studies Institute in Wanchese (Figure 1 and Table 1). These five sites were instrumented with water level loggers that recorded water levels every 30 min. Sea level monitoring in the region includes the NOAA tidal gauge at Duck, with records dating back to 1978. Precipitation data were obtained for the Manteo Airport from 1984 to 2022. Evapotranspiration data (Penman-Monteith method) were obtained from the Pamlico Aquaculture Field Laboratory (approximately 65 km to the SW of Dare Co.) from 2001 to 2022 through the State Climate Office of North Carolina (2023). To evaluate changes in groundwater levels in the deeper Yorktown aquifer, groundwater use and level data were obtained from NC DEQ and the US Geological Survey (USGS) from 1985 to 2020 (NC DEQ 2023a, 2023b; USGS 2023).
Table 1

Dare County, NC groundwater monitoring well characteristics

Elevation (m)Well depth (m)Constructed/loggers installedLat/LongSettingSoilsDist. to ocean/estuary (m)
DEQ wells 
Bodie Island (BI) 0.77 3.05 1984/2008 35.82372/
−75.56948 
Barrier island marsh Fine sand 300 
Wright Memorial (WM) 2.58 7.01 1984/2012 36.01338/
−75.67569 
Barrier island maritime forest Fine sand 473 
Manteo Airport (MA) 3.12 6.10 1984/2003 35.91838/
−75.70164 
Estuarine shrub/scrub, urban Fine sand 275 
Skyco Rd (SR) 1.55 3.96 1984/2003 35.88094/
−75.66579 
Estuarine marsh Muck, loamy sand 390 
Wanchese Comm. Center (WCC) 2.47 5.79 1983/2012 35.84230/
−75.63988 
Estuarine shrub/scrub, urban Fine sand, loamy sand 1,320 
East Lake (EL) 0.64 4.57 1983/2008 35.86904/
−75.92123 
Inland forest Loam 2,240 
Spencer Creek (SC) 0.35 7.32 1984/2008 35.87109/
−75.78605 
Inland shrub/scrub Muck 2,600 
Stumpy Point (SP) 1.38 7.32 1983/2016 35.67428/
−75.90531 
Inland forest Muck 3,672 
Project wells 
Coastal Studies Institute (CSI) 2.74 6.24 2019/2019 35.87539/
−75.66051 
Estuarine marsh Fine sand, fill 150 
South Nags Head (SNH) 1.22 1.58 2020/2020 35.87122/
−75.57754 
Barrier island marsh Fine sand 264 
Nags Head Municipal (MC) 2.74 2.39 2019/2019 35.93368/
−75.61251 
Barrier island urban Fine sand 300 
Dowdy Park (DP) 2.74 2.32 2019/2019 35.97692/
−75.63990 
Barrier island urban Fine sand 545 
Bonnett St (BS) 3.66 3.16 2019/2019 35.97990/
−75.63655 
Barrier island beach Sand 110 
Elevation (m)Well depth (m)Constructed/loggers installedLat/LongSettingSoilsDist. to ocean/estuary (m)
DEQ wells 
Bodie Island (BI) 0.77 3.05 1984/2008 35.82372/
−75.56948 
Barrier island marsh Fine sand 300 
Wright Memorial (WM) 2.58 7.01 1984/2012 36.01338/
−75.67569 
Barrier island maritime forest Fine sand 473 
Manteo Airport (MA) 3.12 6.10 1984/2003 35.91838/
−75.70164 
Estuarine shrub/scrub, urban Fine sand 275 
Skyco Rd (SR) 1.55 3.96 1984/2003 35.88094/
−75.66579 
Estuarine marsh Muck, loamy sand 390 
Wanchese Comm. Center (WCC) 2.47 5.79 1983/2012 35.84230/
−75.63988 
Estuarine shrub/scrub, urban Fine sand, loamy sand 1,320 
East Lake (EL) 0.64 4.57 1983/2008 35.86904/
−75.92123 
Inland forest Loam 2,240 
Spencer Creek (SC) 0.35 7.32 1984/2008 35.87109/
−75.78605 
Inland shrub/scrub Muck 2,600 
Stumpy Point (SP) 1.38 7.32 1983/2016 35.67428/
−75.90531 
Inland forest Muck 3,672 
Project wells 
Coastal Studies Institute (CSI) 2.74 6.24 2019/2019 35.87539/
−75.66051 
Estuarine marsh Fine sand, fill 150 
South Nags Head (SNH) 1.22 1.58 2020/2020 35.87122/
−75.57754 
Barrier island marsh Fine sand 264 
Nags Head Municipal (MC) 2.74 2.39 2019/2019 35.93368/
−75.61251 
Barrier island urban Fine sand 300 
Dowdy Park (DP) 2.74 2.32 2019/2019 35.97692/
−75.63990 
Barrier island urban Fine sand 545 
Bonnett St (BS) 3.66 3.16 2019/2019 35.97990/
−75.63655 
Barrier island beach Sand 110 

For long-term NC Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ) wells, the year of logger installation indicates when sampling frequency shifted to daily. Additional information on NC DEQ wells and groundwater data is available at NC DEQ (2023a).

Figure 1

NC DEQ surficial aquifer wells (eight sites) in Dare County, NC (orange squares), additional project sampling wells (green triangles), and the NOAA tidal gage at Duck, NC (purple circle). Acronyms: Wright Memorial (WM); Dowdy Park (DP); Bonnett St. (BS); Nags Head MC (MC); Bodie Island (BI); Manteo Airport (MA); Skyco Rd (SR); Coastal Studies Institute (CSI); Wanchese CC (WCC); Spencer Creek (SC); East Lake (EL); and Stumpy Point (SP).

Figure 1

NC DEQ surficial aquifer wells (eight sites) in Dare County, NC (orange squares), additional project sampling wells (green triangles), and the NOAA tidal gage at Duck, NC (purple circle). Acronyms: Wright Memorial (WM); Dowdy Park (DP); Bonnett St. (BS); Nags Head MC (MC); Bodie Island (BI); Manteo Airport (MA); Skyco Rd (SR); Coastal Studies Institute (CSI); Wanchese CC (WCC); Spencer Creek (SC); East Lake (EL); and Stumpy Point (SP).

Close modal

At individual sites, the mean annual depth to groundwater data were assessed for normality using a Ryan-Joiner test. Data from all sites exhibited a normal distribution; with the exception of the BI site, which had a normal distribution after log-transformation. In addition, annual precipitation and sea level data exhibited normal distributions. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate trends in mean annual groundwater depth, precipitation, and sea level over time. This approach has been used in other recent groundwater trend studies (Smith & Medeiros 2019; Cox et al. 2019). In addition, Sen's slope estimator was used to estimate the magnitude of groundwater depth and sea level trends (Sen 1968). Sen's slope estimates the magnitude of trends in long-term temporal data and is considered to be less affected by outliers in the data (Nam et al. 2022; Jiqin et al. 2023).

For long-term analysis of depth to groundwater (1984–2022), there were data gaps at individual sites, and a change in frequency in sampling (from approximately bi-monthly in the 1980s and 1990s to daily in the early 2000s (Tables 13)). Each site had at least 4 data points per year from 2000 to 2022. Several sites had less than 3 data points/year from 1986 to 1999 (Table 3). Other studies (e.g. Smith & Medeiros 2019) have used paired well regressions to fill data gaps. Initial data analysis revealed that a paired well approach was slightly less effective (mean R2 = 45%) than a multiple regression approach (mean R2 = 56%). Multiple regression analysis revealed that mean annual sea level and annual precipitation totals could be used to estimate mean annual groundwater depth at sites that had years with limited data (Table 2). To approximate mean annual groundwater depths at sites for years with <3 measurements, the complete record of mean annual groundwater depth from 2000 to 2022 was used to develop multiple regression equations to approximate mean annual groundwater depth at individual sites for the specific year (Table 2). The total precipitation and mean annual sea level for the years indicated in Table 3 were used to approximate mean annual groundwater depth for individual sites for years that had <3 measurements based on the equations in Table 2. This approach resulted in 12.8% of mean annual groundwater depth data points as regression estimates. Monthly data analysis at long-term sites focused on synthesis of daily groundwater depth records. Daily groundwater depth data from 2013 to 2022 was used to evaluate seasonal variability of groundwater depth in Dare Co. Daily data was available for all sites during this period, apart from SP (2017–2022).

Table 2

Multiple regression equations to estimate mean annual groundwater depth at sites based on 2000–2022 data

SiteMultiple regression equationR2
BI GW Depth (m) 0.7825 − 1.155 SL (m) − 0.001227 Precip. (cm/year) 58.82% 
WCC GW Depth (m) 1.384 − 2.505 SL (m) − 0.00553 Precip. (cm/year) 48.90% 
EL GW Depth (m) 1.571 − 3.246 SL (m) − 0.00607 Precip. (cm/year) 46.75% 
MA GW Depth (m) 2.490 − 1.576 SL (m) − 0.00353 Precip. (cm/year) 51.77% 
SR GW Depth (m) 1.6434 − 1.171 SL (m) − 0.001761 Precip. (cm/year) 67.70% 
SC GW Depth (m) 0.4374 − 1.607 SL (m) − 0.000297 Precip. (cm/year) 72.07% 
SP GW Depth (m) 1.3557 − 0.553 SL (m) − 0.002439 Precip. (cm/year) 38.71% 
WM GW Depth (m) 1.865 − 1.941 SL (m) − 0.00764 Precip. (cm/year) 61.30% 
SiteMultiple regression equationR2
BI GW Depth (m) 0.7825 − 1.155 SL (m) − 0.001227 Precip. (cm/year) 58.82% 
WCC GW Depth (m) 1.384 − 2.505 SL (m) − 0.00553 Precip. (cm/year) 48.90% 
EL GW Depth (m) 1.571 − 3.246 SL (m) − 0.00607 Precip. (cm/year) 46.75% 
MA GW Depth (m) 2.490 − 1.576 SL (m) − 0.00353 Precip. (cm/year) 51.77% 
SR GW Depth (m) 1.6434 − 1.171 SL (m) − 0.001761 Precip. (cm/year) 67.70% 
SC GW Depth (m) 0.4374 − 1.607 SL (m) − 0.000297 Precip. (cm/year) 72.07% 
SP GW Depth (m) 1.3557 − 0.553 SL (m) − 0.002439 Precip. (cm/year) 38.71% 
WM GW Depth (m) 1.865 − 1.941 SL (m) − 0.00764 Precip. (cm/year) 61.30% 
Table 3

For years when there were less than 3 depth measurements for mean estimates (indicated with an X), the multiple regression equations (Table 2) were used to approximate the mean annual groundwater depth at the individual sites

YearBIWCCELMASRSCSPWM
1986        
1987        
1988        
1989   
1990    
1991     
1992     
1995       
1996    
1997      
1998       
1999    
YearBIWCCELMASRSCSPWM
1986        
1987        
1988        
1989   
1990    
1991     
1992     
1995       
1996    
1997      
1998       
1999    

Groundwater depth across Dare County was estimated for current conditions, and future NOAA SLR intermediate projections in 2060 and 2100 using ArcGIS Pro. A digital elevation model (DEM) was constructed using 5 m QL2 LiDAR data acquired from NCEM (2023), which was the finest elevation resolution available for this county at the time of the study. DEM tiles were integrated into ArcGIS Pro 3.1.3 to create a land surface elevation. A point cloud was generated using a fishnet with a 30 m × 30 m cell size. Since most of the study area is <4 m above sea level, a coarser cell size resolution (e.g. 30 m × 30 m) was selected in lieu of a finer resolution (e.g. 5 m × 5 m) to increase computation practicality (e.g. processing time and data storage). Study areas with more variability in elevation data may require a finer cell size to avoid accuracy issues (ESRI 2021). Points that populated over surface water features (i.e. land surface elevation above NAVD88 = 0 m) were removed from the point cloud. After removing these points, the total number of observations in the point cloud was 1,006,810. The number of observations that were <4 m above sea level was 979,785 (97.3% of the total). In the original 5 m DEM, there were 784,000,000 observations and 770,948,773 of these were <4 m above sea level (98.3% of the total). After creating the point cloud, elevation data were extracted from the DEM. Current groundwater depth was estimated using a linear regression based on land surface elevation above NAVD88 (Figure 7(a)). After creating the raster layer for the current groundwater depths, predicted groundwater depth was compared with the mean measured groundwater depths for monitoring wells listed in Table 1. There was a moderate relationship between the predicted groundwater depth and mean measured groundwater depth (R2 = 0.64). The mean difference between the two variables was −8% ± 63%. Groundwater depth in 2060 and 2100 was estimated by subtracting current groundwater estimates by the projected mean groundwater rise for each respective year. Mean groundwater rise projections were estimated to be 0.63 m and 1.6 m for 2060 and 2100, respectively. These estimates were based on intermediate SLR projections by NOAA (2024), static annual rainfall accumulations, and the relationship between sea level and groundwater depth (Equation (1)). Ordinary kriging was used to create a groundwater depth map for current, 2060, and 2100 sea level projections for Dare County.

SLR influence on groundwater depth

The mean annual sea level trend at Duck, NC from 1984 to 2022 indicated sea level is rising at 4.8–4.9 mm/year based on linear regression analysis (Figure 2) and Sen's slope estimates, in agreement with the NOAA's 1978–2023 estimate of 4.88 mm/year (NOAA 2024). It is estimated that mean annual sea level has risen approximately 182 mm at Duck, NC over the 1984–2022 period. A comparison of annual average groundwater depth for the eight NC DEQ surficial aquifer wells in Dare County reveals rising groundwater levels (declining groundwater depth) in the surficial aquifer corresponding with SLR. However, based on linear regression analysis and Sen's slope estimates, the approximate rate of groundwater level rise (depth decline) is 7.5–7.6 mm/year, which is larger than SLR alone (Figure 2 and Table 4). This indicates that other physical drivers are contributing to the groundwater level rise. Annual precipitation was variable over this time period and ranged from 62 to 152 cm/year but did not indicate a clear increasing or decreasing trend in total annual precipitation over that time period. Thus, the shallower groundwater depths over time cannot be explained by increasing precipitation over the range of years.
Table 4

Sen's slope and linear regression estimates of groundwater depth vs. time for the eight long-term surficial aquifer groundwater monitoring wells in Dare County, NC (− slope indicates groundwater is rising closer to the surface)

BIELMASRSCSPWCCWMMean
GW
Sen's slope (mm/year) −4.10 −11.68 −7.12 −6.14 −5.50 −0.84 −16.47 −8.58 −7.55 
Regression R2 44.20 28.40 33.30 53.50 37.70 0.49 45.50 17.60 43.6 
Regression slope (mm/year) −4.50 −12.00 −6.70 −6.80 −4.90 −0.50 −17.00 −7.20 −7.50 
BIELMASRSCSPWCCWMMean
GW
Sen's slope (mm/year) −4.10 −11.68 −7.12 −6.14 −5.50 −0.84 −16.47 −8.58 −7.55 
Regression R2 44.20 28.40 33.30 53.50 37.70 0.49 45.50 17.60 43.6 
Regression slope (mm/year) −4.50 −12.00 −6.70 −6.80 −4.90 −0.50 −17.00 −7.20 −7.50 
Figure 2

Long-term (1984–2022) mean annual sea level at NOAA Duck, NC tidal gage (station 8651370) and mean annual groundwater depth for the eight NC DEQ surficial aquifer wells in Dare Co, NC. Annual precipitation totals are from Manteo Airport. Dashed lines indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Figure 2

Long-term (1984–2022) mean annual sea level at NOAA Duck, NC tidal gage (station 8651370) and mean annual groundwater depth for the eight NC DEQ surficial aquifer wells in Dare Co, NC. Annual precipitation totals are from Manteo Airport. Dashed lines indicate 95% confidence intervals.

Close modal
Both sea level and annual precipitation had a negative correlation with groundwater depth. Sea level had a greater influence (r = −0.70) on groundwater depth than annual precipitation (r = −0.37), suggesting that SLR had a larger influence on declining groundwater depth in this region. A multiple regression analysis of average annual groundwater depth and annual sea level and precipitation totals revealed that SLR and annual precipitation can explain 65.5% of the variability in groundwater depth based on the following equation:
(1)
At individual sites, approximate rates of change in annual groundwater depth were estimated using linear regression analysis and Sen's slope estimates. All sites indicated groundwater levels were rising with sea level (declining groundwater depth), with the exception of SP. At the sites exhibiting groundwater level rise, the greatest rate of groundwater depth decline was estimated at Wanchese Community Center (−17 mm/year) and lowest rate at Bodie Island (−4.5 mm/year) (Table 4). Sea level explained between 25 and 58% of the variability in mean annual groundwater depth at the individual sites (Figure 3(a) and 3(b)). For the mean annual Dare County groundwater depth, sea level explained 49% of the variability. As sea level has risen, the groundwater levels have risen in the surficial aquifer and conversely, the groundwater depth has declined. Overall, the results indicate that SLR has resulted in declining groundwater depth in Dare County since the 1980s.
Figure 3

(a) Mean annual sea level vs. mean annual groundwater depth at island sites. (b) Inland sites. The 1 m dashed line indicates the approximate depth at which the 0.3–0.45 m VSD would be met, based on trench depths of 0.7–0.55 m. When groundwater depth is <1 m, OWTS are less likely to have adequate VSD.

Figure 3

(a) Mean annual sea level vs. mean annual groundwater depth at island sites. (b) Inland sites. The 1 m dashed line indicates the approximate depth at which the 0.3–0.45 m VSD would be met, based on trench depths of 0.7–0.55 m. When groundwater depth is <1 m, OWTS are less likely to have adequate VSD.

Close modal

Wanchese Community Center on Roanoke Island had the most extreme groundwater level rise (approximately 0.66 m from 1984 to 2022) (Figure 3(a)). These data suggest that septic systems in the region have experienced reduced VSD over this time period. Average drainfield depths at four OWTS sites in Nags Head were 0.7 m. Based on the NC VSD requirements of 0.3 (silty/clay soils) − 0.45 m (sandy soils), this would require a minimum of approximately 1 m groundwater depth at sites with conventional septic systems. Overall, only three sites (SR, SP, and MA) had mean annual groundwater depths >1 m where conventional septic systems could be viable. Based on the trend, it was estimated that groundwater levels have risen approximately 285 mm (0.93 ft.) since 1984. The groundwater depth data indicate that VSD for septic systems has been declining over time in Dare Co, associated with rising sea level.

Recent studies indicate that coastal storms and SLR can reduce the effectiveness of OWTS in Atlantic coastal communities from Rhode Island (Cooper et al. 2016; Cox et al. 2019, 2020a, 2020b), New York (Fisher et al. 2016), NC (O'Driscoll et al. 2014; Humphrey et al. 2017), and Florida (Miami-Dade Co. 2018). Cox et al. (2019) focused on changing groundwater levels in coastal Rhode Island and found that on average groundwater levels were rising at 14 mm/year since 1964 and these changes were affecting coastal OWTS. At Cape Cod National Seashore, MA, mean groundwater level rise of 8.2 mm/year was estimated from 2000 to 2017 (Smith & Medeiros 2019). The mean estimate of 7.5–7.6 mm/year groundwater rise in Dare Co. from the current study and range of 0.5–17 mm/year falls within the range found in these recent studies. These and other studies (Masterson et al. 2016; Sukop et al. 2018; Dong et al. 2019) reveal that groundwater level rise in the surficial aquifer is commonly correlated with SLR in coastal communities along the Atlantic Seaboard. Although correlation between rising sea level and rising groundwater levels (declining groundwater depth) does not necessarily indicate causation, the patterns across the Dare County region and in the other studies mentioned suggest a regional mechanism consistent with a SLR influence on rising groundwater levels in the surficial aquifer.

Overall, SLR and annual precipitation could explain 65.5% of variability in mean annual groundwater depth for Dare County from 1984 to 2022. Additional factors that increase groundwater recharge may also contribute to rising groundwater levels over time. These include decreases in evapotranspiration associated with vegetation removal, increases in onsite wastewater recharge associated with increased water use, seasonal changes in the balance between precipitation and evapotranspiration, infiltration from stormwater management infrastructure, leakage from the water supply network, irrigation, and other factors.

Groundwater pumping and aquifer recharge influence on groundwater depth

A comparison of average annual groundwater depth at the long-term wells revealed that the groundwater levels in the underlying Yorktown aquifer have been getting deeper over time, in contrast to the surficial aquifer (Figure 4(a)). For example, groundwater withdrawals for public water supply at the Skyco Rd. (SR) site have resulted in declining groundwater levels in the underlying Yorktown aquifer. Due to the presence of a confining unit between the surficial and Yorktown aquifers, the surficial aquifer responds to recent rainfall events and seasonal variations in evapotranspiration, whereas the seasonal declines in groundwater levels in the Yorktown aquifer appear to be more heavily influenced by groundwater withdrawals (Figure 4(b)) and show greater seasonal variation associated with elevated water use in the summer tourist season. This deeper groundwater is used by Dare County communities and redistributed to the surficial aquifer via OWTS. These data suggest that groundwater withdrawn from the Deeper Yorktown Aquifer used as a water supply is being discharged to the surficial aquifer via OWTS. The discharge from OWTS is providing additional groundwater recharge to the surficial aquifer, which may also contribute to rising surficial aquifer groundwater levels in the region.
Figure 4

(a) A comparison of mean annual groundwater depth from 1984 to 2022 at Skyco Rd. (surficial and Yorktown aquifer) vs. Dare Co. groundwater withdrawals. (b) Changes in groundwater withdrawals and groundwater depth for the surficial and deeper Yorktown Aquifer for January–December 2022.

Figure 4

(a) A comparison of mean annual groundwater depth from 1984 to 2022 at Skyco Rd. (surficial and Yorktown aquifer) vs. Dare Co. groundwater withdrawals. (b) Changes in groundwater withdrawals and groundwater depth for the surficial and deeper Yorktown Aquifer for January–December 2022.

Close modal

Increased groundwater recharge due to subsurface wastewater treatment and disposal has been observed in other studies (e.g. Cox et al. 2019) and can contribute to groundwater level rise. In a similar barrier island setting at Bogue Banks, NC, O'Driscoll et al. (2019) found that OWTS contributed an additional 18% of annual groundwater recharge to the island, which can contribute to local groundwater level rise. Coastal tourism can have a large influence on water use and wastewater discharge to the surficial aquifer via OWTS, with artificial recharge potentially contributing to rising water tables. In addition, deforestation may also have an influence on rising groundwater levels in Dare County. Deforestation can cause reductions in evapotranspiration that can lead to increased groundwater recharge (Ranjan et al. 2006). In humid regions, urbanization has been shown to reduce evapotranspiration (Mazrooei et al. 2021). The influence of land use change on evapotranspiration and groundwater recharge may play a role for portions of Dare County where land cover has been converted from forest to urban and suburban lawns and buildings. Crawford et al. (2013) estimated that newly developed parcels resulted in a loss of 437 m2 of vegetated cover per parcel in the northern Outer Banks, NC. Further work is needed to better characterize the water budget over time.

Seasonal and storm event influence on groundwater depth

Groundwater depth changes are also associated with seasonal changes in the atmosphere including relationships between temperature–evapotranspiration–precipitation as well as acute rainfall associated with storm events. These changes can also influence the VSD of OWTS. Monthly mean groundwater depth data for Dare County, illustrate a clear relationship with evapotranspiration and precipitation (Figure 5(a)). Groundwater depth declines when evapotranspiration exceeds precipitation. Typically, groundwater depths are shallowest during the winter months, with the lowest median values (0.46 m) occurring during January and February, due to lower uptake of water by plants and lesser evaporation when temperatures are cooler (Figure 5(b)). Monthly precipitation is typically greater in the summer months; however, the evapotranspiration demand is on average larger than the precipitation, creating deeper groundwater depths. Groundwater depth for Dare County is typically deepest during the summer and fall months. The implication is an increasing risk of failure during the winter months because the VSD to treat wastewater is minimized. The coastal tourism influence on water use and wastewater inputs is greatest during the summer months, when surficial aquifer groundwater depths are deeper and VSD is larger for treatment. However, as year-round population grows and tourism increases during the off-season, it is expected that wastewater loads will increase during portions of the year when VSD is more likely to be reduced.
Figure 5

(a) Mean monthly air temperature, precipitation, evapotranspiration, and groundwater depth estimates for Dare Co. based on monthly data from 2013 to 2022. (b) Boxplots of monthly groundwater depth for Dare Co. long-term wells from 2013 to 2022.

Figure 5

(a) Mean monthly air temperature, precipitation, evapotranspiration, and groundwater depth estimates for Dare Co. based on monthly data from 2013 to 2022. (b) Boxplots of monthly groundwater depth for Dare Co. long-term wells from 2013 to 2022.

Close modal
Short-term fluctuations in groundwater levels occur as a direct response to groundwater recharge associated with precipitation events. A focus here is the impact of extreme rainfall events on groundwater. Seven major precipitation events with daily rainfall greater than 6.7 cm (99th percentile) occurred between 2013 and 2022 (period when daily groundwater level data were available). The storm response rise in groundwater levels was evaluated for these events. The precipitation events ranged in magnitude from 6.75 to 12.70 cm/day. Groundwater level rise and the duration of groundwater recession following large precipitation events was related to the magnitude of event precipitation (Figure 6(a)). At individual sites, groundwater level rise in response to large precipitation events ranged from 0.02 (SC) to 1.49 m (MA), with the largest response following the 12.7 cm rain event on 20 July 2018 (Figure 6(a) and 6(b)). Rainfall occurred every day from July 20–25, totaling 29.7 cm for the 6-day period. Following this series of storm events, the minimum recession time (time for groundwater levels to return to pre-event levels based on linear recession if no additional precipitation occurred) ranged from 25 (Spencer Creek, SC) to 53 (Wanchese Community Center, WCC, Figure 6(b)) days at the sites. For this period in July 2018, the majority of sites had groundwater rise of >1 m.
Figure 6

(a) Mean storm event groundwater level rise and duration of groundwater level recession (to pre-event level) estimates for eight long-term Dare Co. wells with daily records from 2013 to 2022. The linear recession estimates are conservative based on the linear recession from single storms; however, with additional rainfall events, the recession can be prolonged. Note: Storm event precipitation is for daily events; however, the October 2015 and July 2018 events had additional precipitation in the following days. (b) Example of daily groundwater level rise (depth decline) and recession following a series of large precipitation events between July 20 and 25, 2018 at the Wanchese Community Center well. 0 = land surface.

Figure 6

(a) Mean storm event groundwater level rise and duration of groundwater level recession (to pre-event level) estimates for eight long-term Dare Co. wells with daily records from 2013 to 2022. The linear recession estimates are conservative based on the linear recession from single storms; however, with additional rainfall events, the recession can be prolonged. Note: Storm event precipitation is for daily events; however, the October 2015 and July 2018 events had additional precipitation in the following days. (b) Example of daily groundwater level rise (depth decline) and recession following a series of large precipitation events between July 20 and 25, 2018 at the Wanchese Community Center well. 0 = land surface.

Close modal

Overall, the groundwater response following periods of heavy rainfall showed that extreme events can result in elevated groundwater levels for weeks to months, reducing VSD and OWTS performance. In cases of major storm events, it can take over a month for groundwater levels to recede to pre-event groundwater depths. During periods following major precipitation events, the VSD will decline and may take days to months to return to suitable conditions for soil-based wastewater treatment. Additional precipitation during the recession periods can prolong the period when VSD is unsuitable for onsite wastewater treatment. These storm and post-storm periods can result in elevated environmental health risk since untreated or partially treated OWTS effluent can be a source of nutrients, fecal bacteria, and viruses to water resources. Additionally, recent work by Housego et al. (2021) indicates that for storm surges during large storms, ocean levels can increase by several months over several days and the changes in hydraulic gradients can result in periods of shallower groundwater depth for several days, particularly in areas closest (within 160 m) to the ocean shoreline. The implications are that large rainfall events >1–2 years recurrence interval (8.6–10.5 cm/day) can be sufficient to cause groundwater level rise greater than the 30–45 cm VSD and inundate systems for periods ranging from weeks to months, depending on storm magnitude and site drainage characteristics. Acceleration of coastal erosion due to storm events (Gopinath & Seralathan 2005) may also increase vulnerability of coastal OWTS by reducing the setback distance (horizontal distance to surface water) which can potentially increase contaminant transport from OWTS to surface waters or lead to acute failure (Rakhimbekova et al. 2023). If surface flooding occurs, there are additional risks of dislodging or damaging OWTS components. SLR interacts with storms over time to increase the inland extent that may experience flooding (Cox et al. 2020a). In the future, this will lead to an increase in coastal OWTS that experience storm-related impairment.

Relationship between land surface elevation and groundwater depth

As previously mentioned, it was approximated that 1 m of groundwater depth at a minimum is needed to meet the NC VSD requirements (assuming drainfield depth is <0.7 m). For the 2021–2022 period, daily records of groundwater depth for the Nags Head sites located in septic system drainfields were paired with the NC DEQ long-term monitoring wells to evaluate the duration of time when conventional OWTS would be inundated or have reduced VSD. Mean groundwater depth typically increased with land surface elevation (Figure 7(a)). Daily groundwater depth was <1 m for at least 5 days for 9/13 (69%) sites. For the nine sites with daily groundwater depth <1 m, the percent of time with <1 m groundwater depth ranged from 100 to 0.7% (Figure 7(b)). Two sites (SC and BI) had groundwater within 1 m of the surface for the entire period. Four sites (MB, CSI, MA, and BS) had daily groundwater depth that was >1 m for the 2-year period, indicating that adjacent septic systems would likely have suitable VSD for most of the year. The sites that did not have any days with groundwater <1 m depth were located at land surface elevations of 2.74 m or greater. These data indicate that conventional OWTS in areas in Dare County where land surface elevation is <2.74 m above sea level are less likely to meet the VSD requirements.

Groundwater inundation of OWTS associated with SLR

Four project sites included wells screened in the septic drainfields (BS, SNH, DP, and MB) providing insight into the direct impacts of groundwater on OWTS. Comparing groundwater depths to drainfield trench depths at each site, only DP and SNH sites included days when groundwater was within 0.45 m of the drainfield. DP had 19 days (2.6%) when groundwater was too shallow for the recommended VSD but never had groundwater shallow enough to inundate the drainfield. The residential site (SNH) had the shallowest groundwater with groundwater found in both the tank and drainfield and was found to be a compromised site due to shallow groundwater depths. At the SNH site, the drainfield trench depth was 0.79 m below the land surface, therefore based on the NC VSD requirement (45 cm) for sandy soils, groundwater depth should be >1.24 m. Specifically, groundwater was recorded at this site from 13 November 2020 to 27 April 2023 and groundwater was found to be inundating the drainfield (<0.79 m depth) 60.5% of the time and the 45 cm VSD requirement was never met (GW depth was never >1.24 m).

For this site, the data indicate that the system is commonly inundated by groundwater which directly impacts the treatment of wastewater with the absence of unsaturated soils beneath the trench (Figure 8(a)). This system was installed in 1988. Based on the average groundwater level rise estimate from the long-term Dare Co. wells (7.6 mm/year), it is estimated that groundwater would have been approximately 0.25 m deeper on average when the system was installed. Assuming similar rainfall patterns to the present, at installation in 1998 the drainfield would have been inundated approximately 3% of the time, and the VSD would have been insufficient (<45 cm) approximately 97.5% of the time. Currently, it is estimated the drainfield is inundated approximately 60% of the time, and the VSD is insufficient 100% of the time. The NOAA intermediate SLR projections for this region (NOAA 2024) were input into Equation (1) to approximate changes in future groundwater depth at this site up to 2100. These projections suggest that by 2040 the drainfield at this site would be inundated 100% of the time and groundwater will likely rise to the surface during large rain events (Figure 8(a)). By 2080, the surface will likely be permanently inundated by groundwater and/or ocean water. Systems at similar elevations (1.22 m) in SNH and other low-lying regions of Dare County will likely experience similar challenges.
Figure 7

(a) Mean groundwater (GW) depth (2021–2022) vs. land surface elevation for all wells. (b) Percent of time (2021–2022) when daily GW depth was <1 m vs. land surface elevation for all wells.

Figure 7

(a) Mean groundwater (GW) depth (2021–2022) vs. land surface elevation for all wells. (b) Percent of time (2021–2022) when daily GW depth was <1 m vs. land surface elevation for all wells.

Close modal
Figure 8

(a) Groundwater depth fluctuations at SNH residential site where groundwater inundation is currently occurring. Past estimates (1988) are based on hindcasting the long-term groundwater level change estimate of 7.6 mm/year. Future projections were estimated with NOAA's intermediate SLR projections and Equation (1). (b) Projected mean annual groundwater depth for Dare Co. areas (based on mean groundwater levels for wells within the monitoring network (sites at land surface elevation below 3.7 m)). SLR projections are based on NOAA low, intermediate, and high local relative SLR scenarios for Duck, NC (NOAA 2024).

Figure 8

(a) Groundwater depth fluctuations at SNH residential site where groundwater inundation is currently occurring. Past estimates (1988) are based on hindcasting the long-term groundwater level change estimate of 7.6 mm/year. Future projections were estimated with NOAA's intermediate SLR projections and Equation (1). (b) Projected mean annual groundwater depth for Dare Co. areas (based on mean groundwater levels for wells within the monitoring network (sites at land surface elevation below 3.7 m)). SLR projections are based on NOAA low, intermediate, and high local relative SLR scenarios for Duck, NC (NOAA 2024).

Close modal

NOAA SLR projections (NOAA 2024) at Duck, NC were used with groundwater trends to estimate future groundwater depths to 2100 (Figure 8(b)). Equation (1) was applied to estimate groundwater depths associated with SLR projections for the low, intermediate, and high scenarios (SLR increases ranging between 0.5 m and 2.1 m by 2100). Here an assumption is made of static annual rainfall totals and not considering potential changes in annual rainfall total. For the high scenario, average groundwater depths within the region are projected to be at the land surface before 2060. For the intermediate SLR scenarios, mean groundwater levels are projected to rise by approximately 0.3 m by 2040 and by 1.65 m by 2100. Thus, there is an increased risk of drainfield inundation by 2040, particularly for systems with conventional drainfields buried deeper than 0.5 m, with drainfield groundwater inundation occurring on average for Dare County by 2060. Conventional septic systems in low-lying areas in Dare Co. are being stressed by rising groundwater levels and systems that had adequate VSD in the 20th Century, may no longer have adequate VSD. At a minimum, remedial actions are needed for systems that are currently experiencing prolonged periods of groundwater inundation.

Based on the relationship between land surface elevation and groundwater depth and the NOAA intermediate local relative SLR projections (1.2 m by 2100, NOAA 2024), future groundwater depth was estimated for Dare County (Figure 9). These estimates indicate vulnerable areas in Dare County, NC where groundwater inundation of OWTS is most likely, including SNH, sound side, low-lying portions of Roanoke Island, and mainland Dare County (Figure 9). It is important to mention that there are some higher elevation areas that have deep water tables that may be suitable for OWTS even with >1 m groundwater level rise in the future, however, these areas are of limited areal extent and generally associated with high dunes in the northern segments of the Outer Banks in Dare County, NC. Broadly, the projections indicate that the land area where groundwater depth is suitable for conventional septic systems will decrease over time (Figure 9). The current land area where groundwater depth is estimated to be >1 m depth is approximately 14% of Dare County land area (152/1,071 km2). By 2060, this is projected to decline to 5% of Dare County land area (54/1,071 km2) and by 2100 to 2% of Dare County land area (19/1,071 km2). The areas that are projected to be most vulnerable to groundwater level rise, generally correspond with NOAA SLR viewer high tide flooding scenarios (NOAA 2023), indicating that this publicly available tool may help to predict areas where septic systems are vulnerable to groundwater inundation when limited groundwater data is available.
Figure 9

Map of estimated groundwater (GW) depths based on linear regression between groundwater depth and land surface elevation above NAVD88. Insets depict current estimates (a), and NOAA intermediate local relative SLR scenarios (NOAA 2024) to estimate GW depth in 2060 (b) and GW depth in 2100 (c). Locations with groundwater depths <1 m are unsuitable for conventional septic systems. Red and dark orange colors denote areas with GW depths estimated to be within 1 m of the surface. Blue areas in insets (b) and (c) denote areas that are currently above sea level that are estimated to be inundated in the future.

Figure 9

Map of estimated groundwater (GW) depths based on linear regression between groundwater depth and land surface elevation above NAVD88. Insets depict current estimates (a), and NOAA intermediate local relative SLR scenarios (NOAA 2024) to estimate GW depth in 2060 (b) and GW depth in 2100 (c). Locations with groundwater depths <1 m are unsuitable for conventional septic systems. Red and dark orange colors denote areas with GW depths estimated to be within 1 m of the surface. Blue areas in insets (b) and (c) denote areas that are currently above sea level that are estimated to be inundated in the future.

Close modal

Study limitations

The future projections included in Figures 8(b) and 9 were focused on the groundwater depth response to projected SLR scenarios and based on the assumption of similar annual rainfall and evapotranspiration rates as current. If the balance between rainfall and evapotranspiration shifts significantly in the future, the changes in groundwater recharge may also affect groundwater depth. Similarly, changes in artificial recharge associated with changes in water use and increased wastewater discharge may affect groundwater depth. Here, we illustrate the intermediate scenario with a global SLR of 1 m in 2100 relative to the 2000 baseline. NOAA local relative SLR projections for this scenario indicates a 1.2 m relative SLR for Duck, NC by 2100 (NOAA 2024). This scenario is closely aligned with a global mean surface air temperature increase of 4 °C by end-century (2081–2100) above the pre-industrial period (1850–1900). The intermediate scenario aligns with a likely upper bound of greenhouse gas emissions (Huard et al. 2022) and more closely follows the observation-based extrapolation of current SLR trends found within the Southeast US to 2050 (Sweet et al. 2022). For reference, the closest greenhouse gas emission scenario for the NOAA intermediate SLR scenario is SSP2-4.5 (1 m increase global mean sea level at end-century relative to 2000) (Sweet et al. 2022). Note that there are a range of possibilities for future SLR and this uncertainty increases for longer time horizons because climate pledges and policies are more uncertain.

Modeled estimates of groundwater depth were based on the relationship between land surface elevation and groundwater depth. Local conditions can lead to variability in groundwater depth such as soil type, depth of confining unit, slope, local variations in wastewater discharge, site drainage, and other considerations. Due to these constraints, the future projections are provided as a basis to evaluate relative risk of groundwater inundation across the study area. In the future, additional monitoring wells can help further improve groundwater table mapping.

As discussed in the methods section, earlier data collection efforts between 1984 and 1999 had less consistent data collection at several wells, resulting in some wells having less than 3 measurements per year. For the long-term groundwater depth trends, data gaps were most prevalent in pre-1999 data, multiple regression estimates used for this period may slightly affect trends at individual wells. The multiple regression approach to fill data gaps may result in less accurate mean annual groundwater depth estimates for pre-1999 data. However, we evaluated the effect this approach had on the long-term trend estimates by comparing mean annual groundwater depth trends from 1984 to 2022 with multiple regression estimates (−7.6 mm/year), from 1984 to 2022 without estimates (−7.9 mm/year), and 2000–2022 (−8 mm/year) and they showed similar trends.

The SLR and accompanying groundwater level rise trends measured in Dare County, NC provides evidence that VSD for OWTS is declining in the region, resulting in increased likelihood of failing or compromised OWTS. The estimates suggest that groundwater levels are rising at approximately 7.6 mm/year, on average this would suggest that systems that had adequate separation distance in the 1980s could be experiencing drainfield inundation. There is increased risk for compromised or failing systems in low-lying areas <2.7 m land surface elevation, such as was shown for the SNH site (Figure 8(a)). With local relative SLR rates projected to increase in the future, the areas viable for conventional septic systems will decrease. Intermediate SLR scenarios and groundwater level rise trends suggest that in this setting, OWTS at sites currently meeting the 30–45 cm VSD requirements could experience inundation within several decades. For example, based on the projected average groundwater level rise of 0.3 m from 2020 to 2040 (Figure 8(b)), systems that currently meet the 0.3 m VSD could experience groundwater inundation within two decades and approximately three decades for 0.45 m VSD requirements. In addition, intense precipitation events can also increase the duration of time when VSD is inadequate for proper subsurface wastewater treatment.

More broadly, there is growing evidence that coastal communities along the Atlantic Coast of the US are experiencing rising groundwater levels in the surficial aquifer associated with SLR, resulting in shallower groundwater depths. Shallower groundwater depths can reduce the effectiveness of OWTS by reducing the VSD which results in a decline in soil-based wastewater treatment effectiveness over time, due to limited aeration and shorter soil residence times. Static VSD regulations do not accommodate for the fact that the VSD may decline over time in areas where the water table is rising. Many states in the US have VSD requirements of 91 cm or greater, however there are numerous states with substantial coastal populations where communities rely on OWTS, such as NC and SC, where the VSD requirements are less stringent (30–45 cm NC, 15 cm SC). With these shallower VSD requirements, there is less margin for error. For NC and other coastal states, barriers to revised VSD regulations may exist. In some cases, the regulatory framework may restrict local regulations, such as in NC where OWTS regulations are statewide (Vorhees et al. 2022). Potential barriers to revised VSD regulations may include: economic constraints, perceptions that stricter VSD regulations would constrain housing and economic development, limited data on groundwater depth and OWTS performance in coastal communities, limited data on climate change impacts to OWTS, community preferences, state and local regulatory priorities and constraints, individual property rights, lack of collaboration between state and local agencies, and other variables (Tryhorn 2010; Kirchhoff & Watson 2019; Vorhees et al. 2022).

In coastal communities that rely on OWTS, there is an increased risk that rising sea level will create situations where even properly sited systems may have VSDs that decline over time and create a greater risk to water quality impairment and public health. Health regulators in the coastal Carolinas have indicated that water table depth is a primary concern for OWTS in the region (Vorhees et al. 2022). These and other considerations have led to a growing number of coastal communities implementing onsite wastewater vulnerability assessments and planning efforts to address this issue, including Miami-Dade County, FL (Miami-Dade County 2018), Nags Head, NC (Miller 2022), and St. Augustine, FL (Kyzar 2021).

Moving forward, policy changes that increase VSD requirements could be developed to provide improved resilience for OWTS in areas experiencing rising groundwater. Additionally, digital databases and tracked inspections and maintenance can improve oversight of compromised or failing systems in vulnerable areas. Engineering solutions may include mounded systems, advanced treatment systems, wastewater reuse, water conservation, groundwater drainage and/or pumping, and shifting to municipal treatment systems. Community planning efforts can be enhanced with increased groundwater level monitoring to improve understanding of changing groundwater dynamics, along with adaptive management, education and outreach. Environmental education efforts that include technical and social innovations can help communities to understand options for transitioning to more sustainable management approaches and the potential role of environmental citizenship (Jorgenson et al. 2019; Falih et al. 2022). Funding for onsite wastewater infrastructure adaptation efforts will be an important aspect, since most OWTS are privately owned. Improved understanding of communities at risk can help to plan for resiliency approaches.

In conclusion, the main findings of this study are as follows:

  • (1) SLR along the NC coast has led to rising groundwater levels.

  • (2) Rising groundwater levels can compromise onsite wastewater treatment by reducing the thickness of aerated soil for soil-based wastewater treatment.

  • (3) Large precipitation events can temporarily reduce the effectiveness of septic systems for weeks to months.

  • (4) Regulatory approaches should consider the effects of rising groundwater levels on coastal onsite wastewater infrastructure.

  • (5) There is a growing need to develop strategies to increase resilience of coastal onsite wastewater infrastructure to mitigate current and future climate change impacts.

This work was supported by funding from the NOAA Climate Program Office NOAA-OAR-CPO-2019-2005530. In addition, the Town of Nags Head provided in-kind support and access to monitoring sites, data, and guidance. We are especially thankful to Holly White, Kylie Shepard, Kate Jones, Andy Garman, David Ryan, Conner Twiddy, and others that assisted with the Nags Head Decentralized Wastewater Management Plan, and Holly Miller and others at Tetra Tech. We appreciate the long-term NC DEQ groundwater depth data and access to wells provided with assistance from Nat Wilson and David May. The State Climate Office of NC provided meteorological data and NOAA provided sea level data for the study. In addition, Lauren Voorhees (NC Sea Grant), Eric Edwards (NC State University), Iain Burnett (NC State University), and Katie Hill (University of Georgia) provided valuable inputs to the project team and insights on climate change influence on septic systems throughout the project. We appreciate the efforts of ECU students (Patrick Bean and others) and staff (John Hoben) who contributed to monitoring efforts. In addition, we are thankful to one Nags Head homeowner that provided access to an OWTS for monitoring and evaluation.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Al-Atrash
M. K.
,
Abd Algabar
F. A.
&
Abbod
L. S.
2023
Assessment of soil microbial properties in some regions affected by climate change
.
Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences
21
(
3
),
623
628
.
doi: 10.22124/CJES.2023.6940
.
Allen
T.
,
Crawford
T.
,
Montz
B.
,
Whitehead
J.
,
Lovelace
S.
,
Hanks
A.
,
Christensen
A.
&
Kearney
G.
2018
Linking water infrastructure, public health, and sea level rise: Integrated assessment in coastal cities
.
Public Works Policy & Management
24
(
1
),
111
138
.
doi: 10.1177/1087724X18798380
.
Cahoon
L.
,
Hales
J.
,
Carey
E.
,
Loucaides
S.
,
Rowland
K.
&
Toothman
B.
2016
Multiple modes of water quality impairment by fecal contamination in a rapidly developing coastal area: Southwest Brunswick County, North Carolina
.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
188
,
89
.
doi: 10.1007/s10661-015-5081-6
.
Cooper
J.
,
Loomis
G.
&
Amador
J.
2016
Hell and high water: Diminished septic system performance in coastal regions due to climate change
.
PLoS ONE
11
(
9
),
e0162104
.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0162104
.
Cox
A.
,
Loomis
G.
&
Amador
J.
2019
Preliminary evidence that rising groundwater tables threaten coastal septic systems
.
Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
5
(
4
),
04019007
.
doi: 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000887
.
Cox
A.
,
Dowling
M.
,
Loomis
G.
,
Engelhart
S.
&
Amador
J.
2020a
Geospatial modeling suggests threats from stormy seas to Rhode Island's coastal septic systems
.
Journal of Sustainable Water in the Built Environment
6
(
3
),
04020012
.
doi: 10.1061/JSWBAY.0000917
.
Cox
A.
,
Surabian
D.
,
Loomis
G.
,
Turenne
J.
&
Amador
J.
2020b
Temporal variability in the vertical separation distance of septic system drainfields along the southern Rhode Island coast
.
Water, Air, and Soil Pollution
231
,
107
.
doi: 10.1007/s11270-020-04488-z
.
Crawford
T.
,
Marcucci
D.
&
Bennett
A.
2013
Impacts of residential development on vegetation cover for a remote coastal barrier in the Outer Banks of North Carolina, USA
.
Journal of Coastal Conservation
17
,
431
443
.
doi: 10.1007/s11852-013-0241-8
.
Dare County Water Department
2023
Facilities
.
Available from: https://www.darenc.com/departments/water-department/facilities (accessed 23 August 2023)
.
Del Rosario
K.
,
Mitra
S.
,
Humphrey
C.
Jr
&
O'Driscoll
M.
2014
Detection of pharmaceuticals and other personal care products in groundwater beneath and adjacent to onsite wastewater treatment systems in a coastal plain shallow aquifer
.
Science of the Total Environment
487
,
216
223
.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.03.135
.
Dong
Y.
,
Jiang
C.
,
Suric
M.
,
Peed
D.
,
Menga
L.
&
Rosenberg Goldstein
R.
2019
Groundwater level changes with a focus on agricultural areas in the Mid-Atlantic region of the United States, 2002–2016
.
Environmental Research
171
,
193
203
.
doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2019.01.004
.
Environmental Systems Research Institute (ESRI)
2021
ESRI Fundamentals of Raster Data: Cell Size of Raster Data
. .
Ezer
T.
&
Atkinson
L.
2015
Sea level rise in Virginia – Causes, effects and response
.
Virginia Journal of Science
66
(
3
),
355
369
.
doi: 10.25778/8w61-qe76
.
Falih
K. T.
,
Hamid Ali
K.
,
Hasoon
D.
,
Al-Maeeni
M. K. A.
,
Mashkoor
S. C.
&
Darweesh
R. T.
2022
Analyzing the role of environmental citizenship in addressing consequences of climate change from a social perspective
.
Caspian Journal of Environmental Sciences
20
(
5
),
1023
1029
.
doi: 10.22124/cjes.2022.6060
.
Fisher
I. J.
,
Phillips
P. J.
,
Colella
K. M.
,
Fisher
S. C.
,
Tagliaferri
T.
,
Foreman
W. T.
&
Furlong
E. T.
2016
The impact of onsite wastewater disposal systems on groundwater in areas inundated by Hurricane Sandy in New York and New Jersey
.
Marine Pollution Bulletin
107
(
2
),
509
517
.
doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.04.038
.
Fox-Kemper
B.
,
Hewitt
H.
,
Xiao
C.
,
Aðalgeirsdóttir
G.
,
Drijfhout
S.
,
Edwards
T.
,
Golledge
N.
,
Hemer
M.
,
Kopp
R.
,
Krinner
G.
,
Mix
A.
,
Notz
D.
,
Nowicki
S.
,
Nurhati
I.
,
Ruiz
L.
,
Sallée
J.-B.
,
Slangen
A.
,
Yu
Y.
,
2021
Ocean, cryosphere and sea level change
. In:
Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(
Masson-Delmotte
V.
,
Zhai
P.
,
Pirani
A.
,
Connors
S.
,
Péan
C.
,
Berger
S.
,
Caud
N.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Goldfarb
L.
,
Gomis
M.
,
Huang
M.
,
Leitzell
K.
,
Lonnoy
E.
,
Matthews
J.
,
Maycock
T.
,
Waterfield
T.
,
Yelekçi
O.
,
Yu
R.
&
Zhou
B.
, eds.).
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
and New York, NY, USA
, pp.
1211
1362
.
doi: 10.1017/9781009157896.011
.
Gopinath
G.
&
Seralathan
P.
2005
Rapid erosion of the coast of Sagar island, West Bengal – India
.
Environmental Geology
48
,
1058
1067
.
doi: 10.1007/s00254-005-0044-9
.
Hauer
M.
,
Evans
J.
&
Mishra
D.
2016
Millions projected to be at risk from sea-level rise in the continental United States
.
Nature Climate Change
6
,
691
695
.
doi: 10.1038/NCLIMATE2961
.
Henneman
T.
2020
Multi-State Comparison: Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Regulations
.
Report
.
Montana Legislative Services Division, Office of Research and Policy Analysis
. .
Housego
R.
,
Raubenheimer
B.
,
Elgar
S.
,
Cross
S.
,
Legner
C.
&
Ryan
D.
2021
Coastal flooding generated by ocean wave- and surge-driven groundwater fluctuations on a sandy barrier island
.
Journal of Hydrology
603
(
B
),
126920
.
doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126920
.
Huard
D.
,
Fyke
J.
,
Capellán-Pérez
I.
,
Matthews
H. D.
&
Partanen
A.-I.
2022
Estimating the likelihood of GHG concentration scenarios from probabilistic integrated assessment model simulations
.
Earth's Future
10
,
e2022EF002715
.
doi: 10.1029/2022EF002715
.
Hummel
M. A.
,
Berry
M. S.
&
Stacey
M. T.
2018
Sea level rise impacts on wastewater treatment systems along the U.S. coasts
.
Earth's Future
6
,
622
633
.
doi: 10.1002/2017EF000805
.
Humphrey
C. P.
,
Finley
A. J.
,
O'Driscoll
M. A.
,
Manda
A.
&
Iverson
G.
2015
Groundwater and stream E. coli concentrations in Coastal Plain watersheds served by onsite wastewater and a municipal sewer treatment system
.
Water Science and Technology
72
(
10
),
1851
1890
.
doi: 10.2166/wst.2015.411
.
Humphrey
C.
,
Iverson
G.
&
O'Driscoll
M.
2017
Nitrogen treatment efficiency of a large onsite wastewater system in relation to water table dynamics
.
Clean – Soil, Air, Water
45
(
12
),
1700551
.
1-9. doi: 10.1002/clen.201700551
.
Jiqin
H.
,
Gelata
F.
&
Gemeda
S.
2023
Application of MK trend and test of Sen's slope estimator to measure impact of climate change on the adoption of conservation agriculture in Ethiopia
.
Journal of Water and Climate Change
14
(
3
),
977
988
.
doi: 10.2166/wcc.2023.508
.
Johnston
J.
,
Cassalho
F.
,
Miesse
T.
&
Ferreira
C.
2021
Projecting the effects of land subsidence and sea level rise on storm surge flooding in Coastal North Carolina
.
Nature Scientific Reports
11
,
21679
.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-01096-7
.
Jorgenson
S. N.
,
Stephens
J. C.
&
White
B.
2019
Environmental education in transition: A critical review of recent research on climate change and energy education
.
The Journal of Environmental Education
50
(
3
),
160
171
.
doi: 10.1080/00958964.2019.1604478
.
Karathanasis
A. D.
,
Mueller
T. G.
,
Boone
B.
&
Thompson
Y. L.
2006a
Effect of soil depth and texture on fecal bacteria removal from septic effluents
.
Journal of Water and Health
4
(
3
),
395
404
.
doi: 10.2166/wh.2006.043
.
Karathanasis
A. D.
,
Mueller
T. G.
,
Boone
B.
&
Thompson
Y. L.
2006b
Nutrient removal from septic effluents as affected by soil thickness and texture
.
Journal of Water and Health
4
(
2
),
177
195
.
doi: 10.2166/wh.2006.067
.
Karegar
M. A.
,
Dixon
T. H.
&
Engelhart
S. E.
2016
Subsidence along the Atlantic Coast of North America: Insights from GPS and late Holocene relative sea level data
.
Geophysical Research Letters
43
,
3126
3133
.
doi: 10.1002/2016GL068015
.
Kirchhoff
C. J.
&
Watson
P. L.
2019
Are wastewater systems adapting to climate change?
Journal of the American Water Resources Association
55
(
4
),
869
880
.
doi: 10.1111/1752-1688.12748
.
Knutson
T.
,
Camargo
S.
,
Chan
J.
,
Emanuel
K.
,
Ho
C.-H.
,
Kossin
J.
,
Mohapatra
M.
,
Satoh
M.
,
Sugi
M.
,
Walsh
K.
&
Wu
L.
2020
Tropical cyclones and climate change assessment: Part II: Projected response to anthropogenic warming
.
Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
101
,
E303
E322
.
doi: 10.1175/BAMS-D-18-0194.1
.
Kunkel
K.
,
Easterling
D.
,
Ballinger
A.
,
Bililign
S.
,
Champion
S.
,
Corbett
D.
,
Dello
K.
,
Dissen
J.
,
Lackmann
G.
,
Luettich
R.
,
Perry
L.
,
Robinson
W.
,
Stevens
L.
,
Stewart
B.
&
Terando
A.
2020
North Carolina Climate Science Report
.
North Carolina Institute for Climate Studies
.
Available from: https://ncics.org/nccsr (accessed 15 April 2024)
.
Kyzar
T.
2021
Assess Vulnerability of OSTDS to SLR and Storm Surge to Develop Adaptation Plans Phase 1
.
University of Florida Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences Rep.
,
66
pp. .
Lautier
J.
2009
Hydrogeologic Framework and Groundwater Conditions in the North Carolina East Central Coastal Plain
.
North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources, Division of Water Resources
. .
Manda
A. K.
,
Sisco
M. S.
,
Mallinson
D. J.
&
Griffin
M. T.
2015
Relative role and extent of marine and groundwater inundation on a dune-dominated barrier island under sea-level rise scenarios
.
Hydrological Processes
29
(
8
),
1894
1904
.
doi: 10.1002/hyp.10303
.
Masterson
J. P.
,
Pope
J. P.
,
Fienen
M.
,
Monti
J.
Jr
,
Nardi
M. R.
&
Finkelstein
J
.
2016
Assessment of Groundwater Availability in the Northern Atlantic Coastal Plain Aquifer System from Long Island, New York, to North Carolina
.
US Geological Survey
.
Professional Paper 1829. Available from: https://pubs.usgs.gov/pp/1829/pp1829.pdf (accessed 15 April 2024)
.
Mazrooei
A.
,
Reitz
M.
,
Wang
D.
&
Sankarasubramanian
A.
2021
Urbanization impacts on evapotranspiration across various spatio-temporal scales
.
Earth's Future
9
,
e2021EF002045
.
doi: 10.1029/2021EF002045
.
Miami-Dade County & Florida Department of Health
2018
Septic Systems Vulnerable to Sea Level Rise
. .
Miller
H.
2022
Town of Nags Head Decentralized Wastewater Management Plan
. .
Nam
L. P.
,
Que
N. D.
,
Van Song
N.
,
Mai
T. T. H.
,
Phuong
N. T. M.
,
Huong
N. T. X.
,
Tiep
N. C.
&
Uan
T. B.
2022
Rice farmers’ perception and determinants of climate change adaptation measures: A case study in Vietnam
.
AgBioForum
24
(
1
),
13
29
.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
2023
NOAA Sea Level Rise Viewer
.
Available from: https://coast.noaa.gov/digitalcoast/tools/slr.html (accessed 01 August 2023)
.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA)
2024
Relative Sea Level Trend for Duck, North Carolina (1978–2023)
. .
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration-National Centers for Environmental Information (NOAA-NCEI)
2023
Climate at a Glance: Divisional Time Series
.
North Carolina, Division 8. Northern Coastal Plain. Available from: https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/climate-at-a-glance/divisional/time-series (accessed 16 August 2023)
.
North Carolina Coastal Resources Commission (NC CRC)
2010
North Carolina Sea Level Rise (NCSLR) Assessment Report
.
NC CRC Science Panel on Coastal Hazards
. .
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NC DEQ)
2023a
Groundwater Levels and Quality
.
Available from: https://www.ncwater.org/?page=343 (accessed 18 July 2023)
.
North Carolina Department of Environmental Quality (NC DEQ)
2023b
Division of Water Resources: Local Water Supply Planning
.
Available from: https://www.ncwater.org/WUDC/app/LWSP/index.php (accessed 25 July 2023)
.
North Carolina Department of Health and Human Services (NCDHHS)
2017
Rules Governing Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems. Title 15A, Subchapter 18E of the North Carolina Administrative Code. Section 1900 - Sewage Treatment and Disposal Systems. Available from: https://ehs.dph.ncdhhs.gov/oswp/docs/15A-NCAC-18E.pdf (accessed 04 April 2024)
.
North Carolina Emergency Management (NCEM)
2023
Spatial Data Download
.
North Carolina Emergency Management
.
Available from: https://sdd.nc.gov/ (accessed 11 September 2023)
.
O'Driscoll
M.
,
Humphrey
C.
,
Deal
N.
,
Lindbo
D.
&
Zarate-Bermudez
M.
2014
Meteorological influences on nitrogen dynamics of a coastal onsite wastewater treatment system
.
Journal of Environmental Quality
43
(
6
),
1873
1885
.
doi: 10.2134/jeq2014.05.0227
.
O'Driscoll
M.
,
Bean
E.
,
Mahoney
R. N.
&
Humphrey
C.
2019
Coastal tourism and its influence on wastewater nitrogen loading: A barrier island case study
.
Environmental Management
64
,
436
455
.
doi: 10.1007/s00267-019-01201-7
.
Paerl
H. W.
,
Hall
N. S.
,
Hounshell
A. G.
,
Luettich
R.
,
Rossignol
K.
,
Osburn
C.
&
Bales
J.
2019
Recent increase in catastrophic tropical cyclone flooding in coastal North Carolina, USA: Long-term observations suggest a regime shift
.
Scientific Reports
9
(
10620
),
1
9
.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46928-9
.
Piecuch
C.
,
Huybers
P.
,
Hay
C.
,
Kemp
A.
,
Little
C.
,
Mitrovica
J.
,
Ponte
R.
&
Tingley
M.
2018
Origin of spatial variation in US East Coast sea-level trends during 1900–2017
.
Nature
564
,
400
404
.
doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0787-6
.
Pradhan
S.
2004
Predicting Nutrient Loadings and Fate and Transport of Nitrogen Derived from On-site Systems
.
Ph.D. Thesis
.
Soil Science
.
North Carolina State University
,
Raleigh, North Carolina
. .
Rakhimbekova
S.
,
Power
C.
,
O'Carroll
D. M.
&
Robinson
C. E.
2023
Potential for shoreline recession to accelerate discharge of groundwater pollutants to coastal waters
.
Water Resources Research
59
,
e2022WR034230
.
doi: 10.1029/2022WR034230
.
Ranjan
S.
,
Kazama
S.
&
Sawamoto
M.
2006
Effects of climate and land use changes on groundwater resources in coastal aquifers
.
Journal of Environmental Management
80
(
1
),
25
35
.
doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2005.08.008
.
Sen
P.
1968
Estimates of the regression coefficient based on Kendall's tau
.
Journal of the American Statistical Association
63
(
324
),
1379
1389
.
South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SC DHEC)
2023
Regulation 61-56 Onsite Wastewater Systems
. .
Stall
C.
,
Amoozegar
A.
,
Lindbo
D.
,
Graves
A.
&
Rashash
D.
2014
Transport of E. coli in a sandy soil as impacted by depth to water table
.
Journal of Environmental Health
76
(
6
),
92
100
.
State Climate Office of North Carolina
2023
Cardinal Data Retrieval Interface
.
NC State University
.
Available from: https://products.climate.ncsu.edu/cardinal/request (accessed 11 August 2023)
.
Sukop
M.
,
Rogers
M.
,
Guannel
G.
,
Infanti
J.
&
Hagemann
K.
2018
High temporal resolution modeling of the impact of rain, tides, and seal level rise on water table flooding in the Arch Creek basin, Miami-Dade County Florida, USA
.
Science of the Total Environment
616–617
,
1668
1688
.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.10.170
.
Sun
G.
,
McNulty
S.
,
Amatya
D.
,
Skaggs
R.
,
Swift
L.
,
Shepard
J.
&
Riekerk
H.
2002
A comparison of the watershed hydrology of coastal forested wetlands and the mountainous uplands in the southern US
.
Journal of Hydrology
263
(
1–4
),
92
104
.
doi: 10.1016/S0022-1694(02)00064-1
.
Sweet
W.
,
Park
J.
,
Marra
J.
,
Zervas
C.
&
Gill
S.
2014
Sea Level Rise and Nuisance Flood Frequency Changes Around the United States
.
NOAA Technical Report NOS CO-OPS 073
.
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service
,
Silver Spring, MD
.
Sweet
W. V.
,
Hamlington
B. D.
,
Kopp
R. E.
,
Weaver
C. P.
,
Barnard
P. L.
,
Bekaert
D.
,
Brooks
W.
,
Craghan
M.
,
Dusek
G.
,
Frederikse
T.
,
Garner
G.
,
Genz
A. S.
,
Krasting
J. P.
,
Larour
E.
,
Marcy
D.
,
Marra
J. J.
,
Obeysekera
J.
,
Osler
M.
,
Pendleton
M.
,
Roman
D.
,
Schmied
L.
,
Veatch
W.
,
White
K. D.
&
Zuzak
C.
2022
Global and Regional Sea Level Rise Scenarios for the United States: Updated Mean Projections and Extreme Water Level Probabilities Along U.S. Coastlines. NOAA Technical Report NOS 01. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Ocean Service, Silver Spring, MD. Available from: https://oceanservice.noaa.gov/hazards/sealevelrise/noaa-nostechrpt01-global-regional-SLR-scenarios-US.pdf.
Tryhorn
L.
2010
Improving policy for stormwater management: Implications for climate change adaptation
.
Weather, Climate, and Society
2
,
113
126
.
doi: 10.1175/2009WCAS1015.1
.
US Census Bureau
2023
Quick Facts
.
Dare County, NC
. .
USGS
2023
Water Use Data for NC
.
Available from: https://waterdata.usgs.gov/nc/nwis/wu (accessed 27 July 2023)
.
Vorhees
L.
,
Harrison
J.
,
O'Driscoll
M.
,
Humphrey
C.
&
Bowden
J.
2022
Climate change and onsite wastewater treatment systems in the coastal Carolinas: Perspectives from wastewater managers
.
Weather, Climate, and Society
14
,
1287
1305
.
doi: 10.1175/WCAS-D-21-0192.1
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).