Water scarcity predominantly affects agriculture production. It is mandatory to save future water to prevent its shortage due to variations in climate. Variation in climate is a significant factor responsible for frequent droughts over the Bundelkhand region in central India. It is necessary to obtain early warning studies in this region to manage and arrange future agricultural water. Out of best Regional Climate Models (RCMs) under the Coordinated Regional Downscaling Experiment (CORDEX) and their driving Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 5 (CMIP5), General Circulation Models (GCMs) for India, the most effective model has been found based on the observed multiscale data for the region. The daily projected data (2021–2100) of best GCM, Earth System Model, ESM-2M have been used to evaluate the future water requirements for major rabi and hot weather crops grown in the region. The climate change effect is seen in the majority, especially in the upper Bundelkhand part. Most of the crops will need more water than the present condition, especially from 2071 to 2100. The findings will also help researchers and policymakers to utilize the future projected data to propose suitable water management strategies for agriculture.

  • The study projected the future agricultural water requirements for major crops of central India.

  • There would be less water available for agriculture in the future, necessitating urgent action.

  • Variation of projected data has been analyzed by the ArcGIS tool.

  • The deficiency of agricultural water is majorly seen in the upper Bundelkhand.

  • The findings will help to develop sustainable climate policies for central India.

Irrigation is a key component of agriculture to balance the food security of human beings. Nowadays, climate change has become a significant issue affecting the availability of future agricultural water and is responsible for the increased frequency of drought events. Major areas around the world are also dependent on rain-fed agriculture due to the changing climate. It is essential to accurately assess the impact of climate change on the future IWR and crop water requirement (CWR) of various crops in the drought-prone central India region. Some studies have also been performed to find the accurate behavior of climate change around the world. Various models represented the accuracy of local climate in earlier studies to see their effect on irrigation. Such as Wang et al. (2016), Rajendran et al. (2017), Gondim et al. (2018), Yahaya et al. (2018), Sahoo et al. (2018), Goodarzi et al. (2019), and Zhang et al. (2020) utilized the global climate models (GCMs) over the various study region around the world, where Bekele et al. (2019) and Durodola & Mourad (2020) assessed the future climate data from regional climate models (RCMs) or using both GCMs and RCMs to conclude the most effective model for projecting accurate IWR as well as CWR for various crops. Yahaya et al. (2018) determined the impacts of potential climate change on the CWR of Plantain in Ondo State, Nigeria, for periods 2050 and 2080s using the six downscaled GCMs. Most of the models concluded the increasing future CWR and IWR of Plantain based on the predicted climate for the periods 2050 and 2080s over the study region. Bekele et al. (2019) found the climate change effects on crop water demand (CWD) and surface water availability in the Birr watershed, Ethiopia. The author used the latest CORDEX model – Africa data output of Hadley Global Environment Model 2-Earth System (HadGEM2-ES) for representative concentration pathway (RCP) 2.6, 4.5 and 8.5 scenarios to evaluate future IWR for Maize crops. The results indicated the increasing rate of IWR for Maize in the study region.

Prior studies conducted for India provided useful information about the potential future agricultural water demand. Pramod et al. (2018) utilized the NorESM1-M model of the CMIP5 for the RCP 4.5 scenario over India to evaluate the IWR for wheat for two climatic periods (2021–2050 and 2051–2080). Results revealed that in the initial climate period, water requirement for wheat decreased over most of the districts in the country while increasing water needs for wheat-growing districts were found for later climate periods over the country. Behera et al. (2016) found the influence of climate change on future crop water requirements (CWR) of paddy, soybean and vegetables in the Sunei medium irrigation project, Odisha, India. Reference evapotranspiration (ETo) and CWR were evaluated with the help of CROPWAT 8.0. The study also predicted the future IWR for 2025, 2050 and 2080 using the GCM model HadCM3. Jaiswal et al. (2021) also evaluated the climate change impact on crop water requirements (CWR) of paddy crops over the Tandula command of Chhattisgarh, India. The authors assessed the average CWR of paddy for the historical period (1971–2014) and three future periods (2020–2035, 2046–2064 and 2081–2100). Compared to the present condition, the study concluded the maximum amount of additional water needed during 2046–2064 for paddy crops. Poonia et al. (2021) also utilized the four best GCMs, CNRM-CM5 (Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques- Coupled Model Phase 5), CCSM4 (Community Climate System Model, version 4), MPI-ESM-LR (Centre National de Recherches Météorologiques Coupled Global Climate Model, version 5) and ACCESS1-0 (Australian Community Climate and Earth-System Simulator version 1.0) to find the effect of climatic variation on irrigation water needs over the eastern Himalayas.

Earlier studies utilized the data from old climate models, which were not found effective for the central India region. Some investigations have been done with the improvements of GCM models to predict climate change and concluded the accuracy and applicability of various models for India (Sharmila et al. 2015; Panjwani et al. 2020). Certain studies have also revealed the performance of RCM models along with the GCMs for the Indian climate (Mishra et al. 2014, 2018; Choudhary et al. 2018). Some region-specific studies like Balvanshi & Tiwari (2019), and Sreelatha & Anand Raj (2022) have also been carried out over the regions of India. Vishwakarma et al. (2020) assessed the performance of the latest generation GCMs under the CMIP5 as well as RCMs under the CORDEX-SA over the drought-prone Bundelkhand region in central India. The study was performed for the individual as well as ensembles of both bias-corrected GCM and RCM models. The study found that the bias-corrected GCMs performed better than the CORDEX-South Asia RCMs over the central India region. It was also concluded that the bias-corrected GCM, ESM-2M outperformed the ensembles of best GCMs and RCMs. Hence, based on the bias-corrected GCM, ESM-2M data, it is possible to efficiently project the future CWR and IWR of various crops for the Bundelkhand region in central India, which would be further beneficial for the policymakers and the farmers. The current study focuses on assessing the CWR and IWR of major crops for future years in Bundelkhand. It utilizes bias-corrected data from the best general circulation model (GCM), ESM-2M to examine how water requirements may change over time and determine the additional water needed compared to the current scenario in the study region.

The Bundelkhand region, located in central India between 23°08′ N and 26°30′ N latitude and 78°11′ E to 81°30′ E longitude, is comprised of 13 districts in Madhya Pradesh (MP) and Uttar Pradesh (UP) as shown in Figure 1 (Gupta et al. 2014). The study area is one of the severe drought-prone regions in India, with a major climatic variation. The annual rainfall of Bundelkhand ranges from 750 to 1,250 mm. A location map of the study area has been prepared using ArcGIS. This tool has also been employed to spatially represent the trends in IWR for the various crops examined in the study.
Figure 1

Location map of Bundelkhand region in India.

Figure 1

Location map of Bundelkhand region in India.

Close modal

Crops in Bundelkhand

Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 24 gives general lengths and the total growing period for the four distinct growth stages of several crops for varying climates and locations. Single (time-averaged) crop coefficients (Kc), mean maximum plant heights for non-stressed and rooting depth and depletion fraction for major crops grown over the Bundelkhand region are listed in Table 1. The information is intended for use with the FAO Penman–Monteith ETo on well-managed crops in sub-humid regions. The atmospheric evaporation capacity is utilized for determining the percentage p (depletion fraction), which signifies the critical soil moisture level where initial signs of drought manifest, influencing both crop evapotranspiration and yield. These values are expressed as a fraction of the total available water (TAW).

Table 1

Crop details of major crops of Bundelkhand

S. No.CropKc initialKc midKc endCrop height (m)Maximum root depth (m)Depletion fraction (p)
1. Wheat 0.30 1.15 0.30 1.0 0.30–1.20 0.55–0.80 
2. Gram (Pulse) 0.40 1.15 0.35 0.4 0.30–1.00 0.60–0.80 
3. Vegetables 0.70 1.05 0.95 0.30 0.30–1.00 0.50–0.90 
S. No.CropKc initialKc midKc endCrop height (m)Maximum root depth (m)Depletion fraction (p)
1. Wheat 0.30 1.15 0.30 1.0 0.30–1.20 0.55–0.80 
2. Gram (Pulse) 0.40 1.15 0.35 0.4 0.30–1.00 0.60–0.80 
3. Vegetables 0.70 1.05 0.95 0.30 0.30–1.00 0.50–0.90 

The current study compiles crop data covering four distinct growth stages and the total growing period, sourced from the FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56, as depicted in Table 2.

Table 2

Crop stages in days

S. No.Crop categoryCropCrop stages
Total
InitialDevelopmentMidLate
1. Rabi Wheat 15 25 50 30 120 
2. Gram 20 30 40 20 110 
3. Kharif Rice 30 30 60 30 150 
4. Soybean 15 15 40 15 85 
5. Millets 15 25 40 25 105 
6. Groundnut 35 45 35 25 140 
7. Black gram (dry beans) 20 30 40 20 110 
8. Sorghum 20 35 40 30 125 
9. Maize 20 35 40 30 125 
10. Hot weather Vegetables 20 30 30 15 95 
S. No.Crop categoryCropCrop stages
Total
InitialDevelopmentMidLate
1. Rabi Wheat 15 25 50 30 120 
2. Gram 20 30 40 20 110 
3. Kharif Rice 30 30 60 30 150 
4. Soybean 15 15 40 15 85 
5. Millets 15 25 40 25 105 
6. Groundnut 35 45 35 25 140 
7. Black gram (dry beans) 20 30 40 20 110 
8. Sorghum 20 35 40 30 125 
9. Maize 20 35 40 30 125 
10. Hot weather Vegetables 20 30 30 15 95 

Soil and rainfall in Bundelkhand

The upper part of Bundelkhand, which comes under the UP state, is more affected by deficient rainfall (<1,000 mm) than its lower parts of MP state. The Black Clay soil is found majorly in most of the MP in Bundelkhand (especially in Sagar, Damoh and Chhatarpur districts). In contrast, this soil is located majorly in the Mahoba district of UP, Bundelkhand. Red sandy loam and sandy loam soil are dominantly sprayed over the remaining districts of Bundelkhand, especially in most of the parts of UP.

The daily gridded rainfall data have been gathered from the Indian Meteorological Department (IMD) for the 82 rain gauge stations under the 13 districts of the study region from 1982 to 2010 (https://www.imdpune.gov.in/Clim_Pred_LRF_New/Grided_Data_Download.html). Simultaneously, daily gridded data of maximum and minimum temperatures have been collected from NASA (https://power.larc.nasa.gov/data-access-viewer/) from 1982 to 2010. Each category of data is used for this study on a common grid 0.5° × 0.5° resolution. Subsequently, these data are bilinearly interpolated to point data, which is specific to the locations of 82 rain gauge stations in Bundelkhand. The climate data operator (CDO), a Linux tool, has been employed for bilinear interpolation of the gridded data. Table 3 shows the description of 82 rain gauge stations in the Bundelkhand region.

Table 3

Rain gauge stations in Bundelkhand, India

S. No.DistrictLocation
Rain gauge stations
LatitudeLongitude
1. Sagar 23.839° N 78.738° E Sagar, Deori, Rehli, Garhakota, Banda, Khurai, Jaisinagar, Rahatgarh, Malthone, Shahgarh 
2. Chhatarpur 24.916° N 79.591° E Chhatarpur, Buxwaha, Bijawar, Rajnagar, Nowgong, Laundi, Khajuraho Aero, Bara Malhera, Gaurihar 
3. Tikamgarh 24.745° N 78.832° E Tikamgarh, Baldeogarh, Orchha, Niwari, Prithvipur 
4. Panna 24.718° N 80.187° E Panna, Ajaigarh, Shahnagar, Simaria, Pawai, Gonour, Madla, Devendranagar 
5. Damoh 23.832° N 79.439° E Damoh, Mala, Jabera, Hatta, Gaisabad, Hardua, Majhguwan Hansraj, Batiagarh 
6. Datia 25.684° N 78.566° E Datia, Seondha 
7. Jhansi 25.448° N 78.569° E Jhansi, Moth, Magarwara, Barwasagar, Garautha, Pachwara, Mauranipur, Tahrauli 
8. Lalitpur 24.691° N 78.414° E Lalitpur, Mahroni, Rajghat, Tal Behat 
9. Jalaun 26.146° N 79.329° E Jalaun, Kunch, Orai, Mohana, Kalpi 
10. Mahoba 25.292° N 79.872° E Mahoba, Kulpahar, Charkhari 
11. Hamirpur 25.955° N 80.153° E Hamirpur, Khanna, Maudaha, Ajnar, Sarila, Rath, Bijanagar, Kaimah, Bharwara 
12. Banda 25.476° N 80.339° E Banda, Badausa, Kamasin, Pailani, Baberu, Chillaghat, Atarra, Manikpur, Naraini 
13. Chitrakoot 25.179° N 80.865° E Karwi, Mau 
S. No.DistrictLocation
Rain gauge stations
LatitudeLongitude
1. Sagar 23.839° N 78.738° E Sagar, Deori, Rehli, Garhakota, Banda, Khurai, Jaisinagar, Rahatgarh, Malthone, Shahgarh 
2. Chhatarpur 24.916° N 79.591° E Chhatarpur, Buxwaha, Bijawar, Rajnagar, Nowgong, Laundi, Khajuraho Aero, Bara Malhera, Gaurihar 
3. Tikamgarh 24.745° N 78.832° E Tikamgarh, Baldeogarh, Orchha, Niwari, Prithvipur 
4. Panna 24.718° N 80.187° E Panna, Ajaigarh, Shahnagar, Simaria, Pawai, Gonour, Madla, Devendranagar 
5. Damoh 23.832° N 79.439° E Damoh, Mala, Jabera, Hatta, Gaisabad, Hardua, Majhguwan Hansraj, Batiagarh 
6. Datia 25.684° N 78.566° E Datia, Seondha 
7. Jhansi 25.448° N 78.569° E Jhansi, Moth, Magarwara, Barwasagar, Garautha, Pachwara, Mauranipur, Tahrauli 
8. Lalitpur 24.691° N 78.414° E Lalitpur, Mahroni, Rajghat, Tal Behat 
9. Jalaun 26.146° N 79.329° E Jalaun, Kunch, Orai, Mohana, Kalpi 
10. Mahoba 25.292° N 79.872° E Mahoba, Kulpahar, Charkhari 
11. Hamirpur 25.955° N 80.153° E Hamirpur, Khanna, Maudaha, Ajnar, Sarila, Rath, Bijanagar, Kaimah, Bharwara 
12. Banda 25.476° N 80.339° E Banda, Badausa, Kamasin, Pailani, Baberu, Chillaghat, Atarra, Manikpur, Naraini 
13. Chitrakoot 25.179° N 80.865° E Karwi, Mau 

The future rainfall and temperature data have been utilized from bias-corrected GCM, ESM-2M. This bias-corrected CMIP5 GCM was found suitable out of five CORDEX-RCMs and their driving latest generation CMIP5 GCMs for the Bundelkhand region in the recent study of Vishwakarma et al. (2020, https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2020.177). The description of the model is shown in Table 4.

Table 4

Description of best CMIP5 GCM for central India region

S.No.CMIP5 driving modelsContributing
CMIP5 modeling center
1. GFDL-ESM-2M Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), USA 
S.No.CMIP5 driving modelsContributing
CMIP5 modeling center
1. GFDL-ESM-2M Geophysical Fluid Dynamics Laboratory (GFDL), National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), USA 

IWR and CWR have been evaluated using the CROPWAT tool developed by FAO, Italy (Smith 1992). The standard methods involved to assess the IWR, CWR and other factors are detailed as follows,

Calculation of CWR

A CWR is the amount of water necessary to compensate for evapotranspiration loss in a cultivated field. The experts recommended adopting the FAO Penman–Monteith method as a standard method to estimate reference evapotranspiration (ETo) based on the computation of the various parameters. The crop coefficient (Kc) is used to link crop evapotranspiration (ETc) to ETo, which is based on experimentally confirmed ETc/ETo ratios. The FAO Penman–Monteith method, which is employed to calculate ETo in millimeters per day (mm/day), can be outlined in the following equation:
(1)
where Rn is the net radiation at the crop surface (MJ m2/day); G is the soil heat flux density (MJ m2/day); T is the mean daily air temperature at 2 m height (°C); u2 is the wind speed at 2 m height (m/s); es is the saturation vapor pressure (kpa); ea is the actual vapor pressure (kpa); esea is the saturation vapor pressure deficit (kpa); Δ is the slope vapor pressure curve (kpa/°C); γ is the psychometric constant (kpa/°C).

The current research employed a fixed Kc value to estimate ET, as well as IWR and CWR. However, it's important to note that climate change can significantly alter the crop growth cycle. Maintaining a constant Kc throughout the future neglects the potential impacts of climate change on crop development stages. Future studies may benefit from considering these factors.

Calculation of effective rainfall

Effective rainfall indicates the proportion of actual rainfall that plants can utilize efficiently in agriculture production. Fixed percentage of rainfall, dependable rain, the empirical formula and the U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service (USDA-SCS) method (USDA 1970; Tigkas et al. 2019) are some of the techniques available to evaluate effective rainfall. USDA-SCS method is one of the more frequent and accurate methods for calculating effective rainfall. The USDA-SCS formula for monthly steps is shown in the following equations:
(2)
(3)
where Peff is the effective dependable rainfall in mm. Based on the decadal time steps, the USDA formula is shown in the following equations:
(4)
(5)

Calculation of IWR

As per FAO manual no. 56 (Allen et al. 1998), ‘IWR is the difference between the crop water need and effective precipitation.’ The net irrigation requirement can be summarized as
(6)
where T is the total crop-growing period and ETo, IRn and Peff are in mm.

Trends in historical observed and modeled projected climate

Based on the conclusions drawn from Vishwakarma et al. (2020), bias-corrected GCM, ESM-2M could be utilized to predict the better climate of Bundelkhand. Historical observed annual rainfall (1971–2005) and projected modeled annual rainfall (2005–2100) have been plotted with respect to time to observe the trend or pattern change of rainfall against the historical data. The slope of the annual rainfall pattern has been found to increase for RCP 4.5 scenario (y = 1.7921x + 781.78) with respect to the historical observed trend (y = 0.5853x + 939.66), while it's found decreasing for RCP 8.5 (y = −0.6038x + 951.59). The rainfall patterns are shown in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Annual historical observed (1971–2005) and modeled predicted (2005–2100) rainfall pattern.

Figure 2

Annual historical observed (1971–2005) and modeled predicted (2005–2100) rainfall pattern.

Close modal
Similarly, the trend of annual maximum and minimum temperatures has been observed by plotting the historical observed and modeled projected temperature data with respect to the time. The results of maximum and minimum temperature trends are shown in Figures 3 and 4, respectively. The increasing maximum temperature has been found for both scenarios. The steepness of the slope of the projected maximum temperature for RCP 8.5 (y = 0.0459x + 32.012) has been found to be more than the RCP 4.5 scenario (y = 0.0139x + 33.77), as shown in Figure 3.
Figure 3

Annual historical observed (1982–2005) and modeled predicted (2005–2100) maximum temperature pattern.

Figure 3

Annual historical observed (1982–2005) and modeled predicted (2005–2100) maximum temperature pattern.

Close modal
Figure 4

Annual historical observed (1982–2005) and modeled predicted (2005–2100) minimum temperature pattern.

Figure 4

Annual historical observed (1982–2005) and modeled predicted (2005–2100) minimum temperature pattern.

Close modal

Similarly, the steepness of the slope of the projected minimum temperature for RCP 8.5 (y = 0.0469x + 18.549) has been found to be more than the RCP 4.5 scenario (y = 0.0127x + 20.304), as shown in Figure 4. Hence, it can be concluded that the maximum temperature will rise in the coming years while considering both scenarios. The rate of temperature rise is higher for RCP 8.5 compared to RCP 4.5.

Historical observation for major crops

Two major grown rabi crops, wheat and gram, have been chosen to evaluate their district-wise IWR and CWR over the Bundelkhand region. Rabi crops are typically grown from October to March, whereas vegetables are cultivated from February to June across the study region. This temporal pattern is observed and utilized within the study. Monthly averaged historical data of rainfall and potential evapotranspiration (PET) from 1982 to 2010 have been used for the study. PET has been evaluated using the FAO-recommended Penman–Monteith equation. IWR and CWR have been assessed using the CROPWAT 8.0 tool for the expected date of sowing of both the crops and for major soil groups founded in the districts of Bundelkhand. IWR and CWR have been evaluated using the soil and rainfall data and crop data from FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper No. 56 (Table 1). The results of historical observations for rabi crops are shown in Table 5.

Table 5

Evaluation of historical (1982–2010) IWR and CWR (mm) for major rabi crops

S. No.Districts in BundelkhandWheat
Gram
IWRCWRIWRCWR
Sagar 351.9 398.3 316.4 351.8 
Chhatarpur 341.5 381.2 308.7 337.1 
Tikamgarh 349.8 379.6 314.8 336.0 
Panna 338.4 381.7 306.3 337.2 
Damoh 352.4 396.6 317.6 350.1 
Datia 353.5 382.9 318.4 340.7 
Jhansi 352.7 383.4 318.3 340.2 
Lalitpur 359.4 387.1 321.4 343.0 
Jalaun 342.0 373.6 308.4 331.7 
10 Mahoba 337.4 381.6 304.7 337.8 
11 Hamirpur 342.7 379.2 308.7 336.0 
12 Banda 343.4 378.1 309.0 334.9 
13 Chitrakoot 341.1 380.5 308.9 337.0 
S. No.Districts in BundelkhandWheat
Gram
IWRCWRIWRCWR
Sagar 351.9 398.3 316.4 351.8 
Chhatarpur 341.5 381.2 308.7 337.1 
Tikamgarh 349.8 379.6 314.8 336.0 
Panna 338.4 381.7 306.3 337.2 
Damoh 352.4 396.6 317.6 350.1 
Datia 353.5 382.9 318.4 340.7 
Jhansi 352.7 383.4 318.3 340.2 
Lalitpur 359.4 387.1 321.4 343.0 
Jalaun 342.0 373.6 308.4 331.7 
10 Mahoba 337.4 381.6 304.7 337.8 
11 Hamirpur 342.7 379.2 308.7 336.0 
12 Banda 343.4 378.1 309.0 334.9 
13 Chitrakoot 341.1 380.5 308.9 337.0 

The historical CWR and IWR (1982–2010) of vegetables have also been evaluated for all the districts of Bundelkhand. The vegetable class (cucurbits, okra, cowpea, bottle gourd and sponge gourd) has been chosen as hot weather crops to see the effect of climate change on them. The results of the IWR and CWR of vegetables are shown in Table 6.

Table 6

Historical observation of IWR and CWR (mm) for vegetables

StationSagarChhatarpurTikamgarhPannaDamohDatiaJhansi
IWR 586.7 586.9 586.3 587.5 591.7 593.7 589.0 
CWR 604.7 605.8 601.9 603.1 609.0 612.3 609.3 
StationLalitpurJalaunMahobaHamirpurBandaChitrakoot
IWR 583.9 594.7 592.4 592.8 593.0 589.3  
CWR 596.7 611.9 611.2 612.6 612.4 611.7  
StationSagarChhatarpurTikamgarhPannaDamohDatiaJhansi
IWR 586.7 586.9 586.3 587.5 591.7 593.7 589.0 
CWR 604.7 605.8 601.9 603.1 609.0 612.3 609.3 
StationLalitpurJalaunMahobaHamirpurBandaChitrakoot
IWR 583.9 594.7 592.4 592.8 593.0 589.3  
CWR 596.7 611.9 611.2 612.6 612.4 611.7  

Historical observations tabulated in Tables 5 and 6 have been utilized to see the effect of climate change on future water needs of major crops over the study region.

Future projections for major crops

Future water needs for major crops have been evaluated for three time periods as 2011–2040 (initial century), 2041–2070 (mid-century) and 2071–2100 (end century) to compare the future data with observed historical data (1982–2010) for the same date of sowing. The bias-corrected future data of meteorological variables were chosen for two scenarios RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5. Thus, the IWR and CWR have been evaluated for both scenarios.

Future projections of IWR and CWR of major rabi crops

Future irrigation and CWR for wheat and gram rabi crops have been evaluated and compared with historical observation. CWD for wheat has also been found more in all the future periods, especially for the first future period of RCP 4.5 and the future third period of RCP 8.5. For RCP 4.5, the need for irrigation water for wheat has been found to be a maximum of up to 360 mm for the first (2011–2040) and second (2041–2070) future periods except for Tikamgarh, Lalitpur, and Banda districts, as shown in Figure 5. In the context of RCP 4.5, there wasn't a significant rise observed in IWR and CWR between 2071 and 2100 compared to RCP 8.5. This difference can be attributed to the notably higher maximum and minimum temperatures projected under RCP 8.5 during the same future period (2071–2100), as depicted in Figures 3 and 4.
Figure 5

Variation of future IWR of wheat with the observed values for RCP 4.5 scenario.

Figure 5

Variation of future IWR of wheat with the observed values for RCP 4.5 scenario.

Close modal
For RCP 8.5, wheat demands more irrigation water for the future third period (2071–2100) than the present over the Bundelkhand region, as shown in Figure 6. The need for irrigation water for wheat has been found maximum of up to 374 mm (RCP 8.5) for the third time period (2071–2100) except for Tikamgarh, Lalitpur and Banda districts. It can be concluded that for RCP 8.5, wheat demands more irrigation water for the third time period (2071–2100) than the present over the Bundelkhand region. This shows the scarcity of water for wheat cultivation in the coming time, especially in 2071–2100.
Figure 6

Variation of future IWR of wheat with the observed values for RCP 8.5 scenario.

Figure 6

Variation of future IWR of wheat with the observed values for RCP 8.5 scenario.

Close modal
Overall, it is observed that the IWR and CWR for the wheat crop will increase in future periods. Similar results of IWR and CWR of gram have been observed. IWR of gram has shown a decreasing trend for RCP 4.5 and an increasing trend for RCP 8.5, whereas CWR of gram indicated the increasing demand for future water for the RCP 4.5 scenario. The IWR of gram crop has not shown any significant trend for the RCP 8.5 scenario, whereas the IWR for the RCP 4.5 scenario had shown a decreasing trend, as shown in Figures 7 and 8, respectively. The cultivation of wheat crop was found unfavorable for the third period (2071–2100) as the additional water demand has been found more up to +27 mm for RCP 8.5, while the additional water demand has been seen more up to +11 mm for the first (2011–2040) and second (2041–2070) time periods of RCP 4.5 scenario over the Bundelkhand. The results of future water demand for RCP 4.5 of gram are shown in Figure 7.
Figure 7

Variation of future IWR of gram with the observed values for RCP 4.5 scenario.

Figure 7

Variation of future IWR of gram with the observed values for RCP 4.5 scenario.

Close modal
Figure 8

Variation of future IWR of gram with the observed values for RCP 8.5 scenario.

Figure 8

Variation of future IWR of gram with the observed values for RCP 8.5 scenario.

Close modal

Besides the wheat crop, the climate change effect is not shown much on the gram crop in the study region. The additional water need found less for most of the study region for both the scenarios compared to the historical condition can be seen for both the scenarios, RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5.

Future projections of IWR and CWR of major hot weather crops

The climate change effect has also been observed on future irrigation and crop water needs of hot weather crops (i.e., vegetables such as cucurbits, okra, cowpea, bottle gourd and sponge gourd) for all three time periods. Irrigation water needs for vegetables have been recorded more at the end century for the central Bundelkhand region for the RCP 8.5 scenario. Increasing water demand has also been found quite less around 10 mm for initial and mid-century, which can be easily managed. Water requirements for the irrigation of hot weather crops have been observed more for the end century with increasing water demand of around 30 mm for RCP 8.5, which can be seen in Figure 9. A very small amount of additional irrigation water is needed for the remaining time periods of both scenarios, which can be easily managed in the future for vegetables. The effect of climate change on crop water needs for vegetables has been identified more in RCP8.5 than the RCP4.5 scenario, especially for the end century (2071–2100). Therefore, when comparing historical observations of IWR for vegetables with future projections under the RCP 4.5 scenario, minimal changes are evident. This lack of significant variation suggests that climatic fluctuations have had little impact on this crop in the region.
Figure 9

Variation of future IWR of vegetable with the observed values for RCP 8.5 scenario.

Figure 9

Variation of future IWR of vegetable with the observed values for RCP 8.5 scenario.

Close modal

Overall, the climate change effect on vegetables in the future has been observed significantly less and could be grown with suitable water management strategies in the hot weather season over the Bundelkhand region.

In summary, the present study indicates that in the future, more water may need to be allocated for major rabi crops like wheat and gram, as well as for hot weather vegetables, due to the impact of climate change in Bundelkhand. Prior research has already assessed future water needs for crops globally, considering both crop-specific requirements and irrigation demands and has highlighted the influence of climate variability on these needs. Many studies have projected an increase in water demand for various crops in the coming years using multiple climate models tailored to regional accuracy. However, there is a notable gap in research regarding the effect of climate change on agriculture in Bundelkhand, a region severely affected by droughts linked to climate change. Therefore, the findings of the present study hold significance for both farmers and policymakers in Bundelkhand.

The effect of climate change has been observed on the future water requirements of major rabi and hot weather crops grown in the Bundelkhand region by utilizing the bias-corrected best-suited CMIP5 GCM (ESM-2M) data and compared to the historical observations. The study concluded the increasing trend of future water requirements had been found for most of the major rabi and hot weather crops grown in the Bundelkhand region. Some major crops were also found suitable to grow in the future without the arrangement of additional irrigation water. Those were gram under the rabi crop and vegetable, also called climate-secure crops. Under the category of rabi crops, additional water demand has been found more of ±27 mm in the future for wheat crops especially at the end of the 21st century (2071–2100), while the gram crop was found secure against the surplus water need in future over the Bundelkhand region.

The study also indicated a decline in future water availability for agriculture, attributed to a reduction in projected rainfall, as depicted in Figure 2. Therefore, essential steps are needed to save them. It is also mandatory to propose proper water management and irrigation practices against the future water crisis for wheat crops. This study will also help researchers and policymakers utilize the projected data of IWR and CWR for proper water management studies.

The results of projected crop and irrigation water requirements of various major rabi and hot weather crops can be utilized to propose the best planting period/dates of crops so that optimum yield can be achieved mainly in case of drought. It would also be advantageous to plan an optimum cropping pattern in future drought years. This study opens the door to utilizing the projected data to find the severity of drought and drought years (monsoon, non-monsoon and annual drought). The future drought projection will also help to see its effect on agriculture in drought-prone regions. The study also helps to choose or opt for the best climate-secure crops in case of future water scarcity.

The FAO-56-based crop coefficient approach is deemed suitable for projecting future CWD. However, it's important to recognize that climate change is causing a reduction in the duration of the crop-growing cycle. Consequently, the reliance on fixed growing periods and constant Kc values within the approach fails to consider the impact of climate change on the crop cycle. Moreover, the influence of atmospheric carbon dioxide on crop evapotranspiration (ET) remains unaccounted for in the current methodology, offering room for further enhancement.

The authors thank the IMD and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) for providing meteorological data to carry out this research work.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Allen
R. G.
,
Pereira
L. S.
,
Raes
D.
&
Smith
M.
1998
Crop Evapotranspiration-Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements-FAO Irrigation and Drainage Paper 56
, Vol.
300
(
9
).
FAO
,
Rome
, p.
D05109
.
Behera
S.
,
Khare
D.
,
Mishra
P. K.
&
Sahoo
S.
2016
Impact of climate change on crop water requirement for Sunei medium irrigation project, Odisha, India
.
International Journal of Engineering Trends and Technology (IJETT)
34
(
8
),
358
367
.
Bekele
A. A.
,
Pingale
S. M.
,
Hatiye
S. D.
&
Tilahun
A. K.
2019
Impact of climate change on surface water availability and crop water demand for the sub-watershed of Abbay Basin, Ethiopia
.
Sustainable Water Resources Management
5
,
1859
1875
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40899-019-00339-w
.
Choudhary
A.
,
Dimri
A. P.
&
Maharana
P.
2018
Assessment of CORDEX-SA experiments in representing precipitation climatology of summer monsoon over India
.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
134
,
283
307
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-017-2274-7
.
Durodola
O. S.
&
Mourad
K. A.
2020
Modelling maize yield and water requirements under different climate change scenarios
.
Climate
8
(
11
),
127
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/cli8110127
.
Gondim
R.
,
Silveira
C.
,
de Souza Filho
F.
,
Vasconcelos
F.
&
Cid
D.
2018
Climate change impacts on water demand and availability using CMIP5 models in the Jaguaribe basin, semi-arid Brazil
.
Environmental Earth Sciences
77
,
1
14
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7723-9
.
Goodarzi
M.
,
Abedi-Koupai
J.
&
Heidarpour
M.
2019
Investigating impacts of climate change on irrigation water demands and its resulting consequences on groundwater using CMIP5 models
.
Groundwater
57
(
2
),
259
268
.
https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12771
.
Gupta
A. K.
,
Nair
S. S.
,
Ghosh
O.
,
Singh
A.
&
Dey
S.
2014
Bundelkhand drought: Retrospective analysis and way ahead
.
National Institute of Disaster Management
,
New Delhi
, p.
148
.
Jaiswal
R. K.
,
Tiwari
H. L.
&
Lohani
A. K.
2021
Assessment of climate change on crop water requirement in Tandula command of Chhattisgarh (India)
. In:
Jha, R., Singh, V. P., Singh, V., Roy, L. B. & Thendiyath, R. (eds)
Climate Change Impacts on Water Resources: Hydraulics, Water Resources and Coastal Engineering
Water Science and Technology Library, vol. 98. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64202-0_3.
Mishra
V.
,
Kumar
D.
,
Ganguly
A. R.
,
Sanjay
J.
,
Mujumdar
M.
,
Krishnan
R.
&
Shah
R. D.
2014
Reliability of regional and global climate models to simulate precipitation extremes over India
.
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
119
(
15
),
9301
9323
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JD021636
.
Mishra
S. K.
,
Sahany
S.
&
Salunke
P.
2018
CMIP5 vs. CORDEX over the Indian region: How much do we benefit from dynamical downscaling?
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
133
,
1133
1141
.
Panjwani
S.
,
Naresh Kumar
S.
,
Ahuja
L.
&
Islam
A.
2020
Evaluation of selected global climate models for extreme temperature events over India
.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
140
,
731
738
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03108-4
.
Poonia
V.
,
Das
J.
&
Goyal
M. K.
2021
Impact of climate change on crop water and irrigation requirements over eastern Himalayan region
.
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
35
,
1175
1188
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-020-01942-6
.
Pramod, V. P., Rao, B. B., Ramakrishna, S. S. V. S., Sandeep, V. M., Patel, N. R., Chandran, M. S., Rao, V. U. M., Chowdary, P. S. & Kumar, P. V. 2018 Trends in water requirements of wheat crop under projected climates in India. Journal of Agrometeorology 20, 110–116. https://doi.org/10.54386/jam.v20i2.520.
Rajendran
M.
,
Gunawardena
E. R. N.
&
Dayawansa
N. D. K.
2017
Impacts of Climate Change on Irrigation Water Demand of Paddy: A Case Study from Hakwatuna Oya Irrigation Scheme in Sri Lanka
.
Sahoo
S.
,
Dhar
A.
,
Debsarkar
A.
&
Kar
A.
2018
Impact of water demand on hydrological regime under climate and LULC change scenarios
.
Environmental Earth Sciences
77
,
1
19
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-018-7531-2
.
Sharmila
S.
,
Joseph
S.
,
Sahai
A. K.
,
Abhilash
S.
&
Chattopadhyay
R.
2015
Future projection of Indian summer monsoon variability under climate change scenario: An assessment from CMIP5 climate models
.
Global and Planetary Change
124
,
62
78
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2014.11.004
.
Smith
M.
1992
CROPWAT: A Computer Program for Irrigation Planning and Management
.
(No. 46). FAO United Nations, Washington DC
.
Sreelatha
K.
&
AnandRaj
P.
2022
Regional evaluation of global climate models for precipitation, maximum and minimum temperature over southern-part of India
.
ISH Journal of Hydraulic Engineering
28
(
Supp. 1
),
449
462
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09715010.2020.1779137
.
Tigkas
D.
,
Vangelis
H.
&
Tsakiris
G.
2019
Drought characterisation based on an agriculture-oriented standardised precipitation index
.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
135
,
1435
1447
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-018-2451-3
.
USDA
1970
Irrigation Water Requirements. Technical Release No. 21
,
Rev. 2
,
United States Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service
,
Washington, DC
.
Vishwakarma
A.
,
Choudhary
M. K.
&
Chauhan
M. S.
2020
Assessment of the performance of CMIP5 and CORDEX-SA models over the drought-prone Bundelkhand region, India
.
Journal of Water and Climate Change
11
(
S1
),
133
144
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2020.177
.
Wang
X. J.
,
Zhang
J. Y.
,
Ali
M.
,
Shahid
S.
,
He
R. M.
,
Xia
X. H.
&
Jiang
Z.
2016
Impact of climate change on regional irrigation water demand in Baojixia irrigation district of China
.
Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
21
,
233
247
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-014-9594-z
.
Yahaya
O.
,
Olufayo
A. A.
,
Oguntunde
P. G.
&
Atanda
E. O.
2018
Estimation of future water requirement for plantain (Musa spp.) in Ondo State, Nigeria using statistically-downscaled climate variables
.
Journal of Earth Science & Climatic Change
9
(
499
),
2
.
https://doi.org/10.4172/2157-7617.1000499
.
Zhang
L.
,
Tan
F.
,
Li
S.
&
Huo
Z.
2020
Potential dynamic of irrigation water requirement for rice across northeast China
.
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
142
,
1283
1293
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-020-03366-2
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).