This study evaluates the impact of climate and land use changes on Lake Tana Basin's hydrology, using datasets on land use, weather patterns, topography, soil characteristics, and discharge. Future climate data were obtained from Global Climate Models (GCMs) from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase Five (CMIP5) and generated using the Weather Generator (LARS-WG) tool from the Long Ashton Research Station with five distinct GCMs. Land use changes were projected using the Markov chain model based on cellular automata (CA). The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model was used to assess changes in hydrological elements between reference and future periods, with calibration and validation ensured by the Integrated Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Analysis Tool (IPEAT). Projections indicate a 4.9 °C increase in ensemble mean annual temperature and a 16% rise in precipitation by the end of the 21st century under Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP) 8.5. Additionally, average annual hydrological components, including water yield, soil water, percolation, lateral flow, runoff, and actual and potential evapotranspiration, are expected to increase due to combined climate and land use changes. Therefore, it is crucial to fully understand these cumulative impacts before formulating and implementing water resource management strategies in the basin.

  • Impacts of climate and LULC on hydrological response were examined.

  • A LULC model was developed using the CA-Markov chain.

  • LARS-WG and SWAT were used for climate and hydrological simulation.

Various land uses, such as agriculture, livestock, urbanization, forestry, and industry (Abbas et al. 2021; Li et al. 2023; Elahi et al. 2024), affected water resources (Waseem et al. 2022). Land use and land cover (hereafter, LULC) and climate change (hereafter, CC) are recognized as the most critical causes of a change in the environment (Kundzewicz 2008; Chanapathi & Thatikonda 2020; IPCC 2022a). LULC alterations and CCs are interconnected (Zhang et al. 2016; Li et al. 2019). LULC change impacts regional, national, and global climatic systems. Land and climate interact in complex ways through changes in forcing and multiple biophysical and biogeochemical feedbacks across different spatial and temporal scales. Changes in land conditions resulting from human activity or CC affect regional and global climates. Alterations in local land cover and land use can either alleviate or exacerbate regional CC (Jia et al. 2022). Incorporating terrestrial climate processes into climate projections enables a better understanding of how land responds to CC and allows for a more accurate estimation of the potential effectiveness of land-based strategies for mitigating CC (IPCC 2014).

It is thought that LULC alterations and CC have an impact on hydrological processes (Chanapathi & Thatikonda 2020). Land use changes and CC can accelerate the global depletion of freshwater supplies, which are essential for sustaining human populations and ecological services (Kaushal et al. 2017). As a result of CC, environment, recreation, industry, agriculture, and energy production risks and costs are rising. CC also changes the quality and amount of water that people and ecosystems can use across the world (Hayhoe et al. 2018; USGCRP 2018). Restoring global water security requires comprehensive consideration of the escalating interaction between land use and CC across all phases, along with our expanding impact on the water cycle from degradation to ecosystem restoration (Kaushal et al. 2017).

A variety of land uses, such as agriculture, urbanization, forestry, and industry, affected water resources (Li et al. 2023; Elahi et al. 2024). Due to the loss of natural resources, population growth, poverty, and rapid urbanization have all been made worse by CC (Awulachew et al. 2008). Water scarcity is expected to worsen dramatically because of increased human demand for water resources. Changes in land use affect how runoff and percolation work, how groundwater is refilled, how much sediment is transported, and how much water is lost through evaporation (Gosling & Arnell 2016). For instance, Hu (2021) reported that changes in river discharge due to CC are highly uncertain, and a recent study used a global streamflow dataset to assess whether such trends are detectable. Streamflow changes occurred more often in basins impacted by human disturbances than in pristine ones, and there was no clear signal from CC alone. This study highlights the importance of incorporating land use change in hydrological studies.

Globally, CC has led to alterations in the amount of rainfall, its seasonal distribution, and its interannual variability (Easterling et al. 2000). These changes in rainfall patterns would have the most significant impact in arid and semiarid regions, where the timing and availability of water play crucial roles in governing primary productivity, biogeochemical cycles, growth and reproduction phenology, and agricultural output (Feng et al. 2013). Predictions suggest that global warming will amplify the hydrological cycle, potentially increasing the intensity of extreme precipitation events and the likelihood of flooding (Tabari 2020).

Nations all across the world are at risk from climate-related hazards (Getachew & Melesse 2012), but the global south is especially vulnerable due to its limited capacity for adaptation and substantial dependence on climate-vulnerable industries, such as agriculture (Aryal et al. 2021). East Africa's agricultural productivity has already been negatively impacted by CC, and things are only going to get worse. By the end of the 21st century, CC is simulated to increase temperatures by 1.4–5.5 °C and precipitation by −2 to 20% in East Africa (Adhikari et al. 2015; IPCC 2022b). Flooding in East Africa will become more likely due to the variability of climate, which will also hurt human health and cause infrastructure damage (Serdeczny et al. 2017).

Global climate models or general circulation models (hereafter, GCMs) are based on the general principles of fluid dynamics and thermodynamics (Stute et al. 2000). The primary approach for forecasting variability and changes in climatic variables involves the use of GCMs. It provides the most reliable information for assessing global change of climate variability. However, the low spatial resolution of GCMs limits their usefulness for assessing local impacts (Fowler 1999; Wilby & Harris 2006; Lee & Singh 2018; Shrestha et al. 2021). Also, it doesn't take into account subgrid-sized things like terrain and clouds, which are very important for figuring out local-scale weather conditions (Fowler 1999; Wilby et al. 2002). For instance, Getachew et al. (2021b) used only a single GCM to assess the impacts of climate and land use change on the hydrology of the Lake Tana Basin (LTB). However, the application of an ensemble of multi-models improves the effectiveness of GCM simulations (Seiller et al. 2012; Broderick et al. 2016; Liu et al. 2017, 2019; He et al. 2018; Das et al. 2019; Pooralihossein & Delavar 2020; Srivastava et al. 2020; Jose et al. 2022). Therefore, downscaling and multimodel ensemble mean are required to minimize uncertainty about CC projections that arise from internal climate variability (Getachew & Manjunatha 2021; Getachew et al. 2021b).

The Upper Blue Nile River Basin (UBNRB) has the highest discharge volume of 1,548 m3/s (Melesse et al. 2014; Tikuye et al. 2023), the second-largest area of 325,000 km2, and the main source of the Nile River (Taye et al. 2015). Due to its political and economic importance, many studies were conducted to find out how the water balance of the UBNRB and the LTB affected by LULC and CCs (Kim et al. 2013; Kuhn 2014; Zeleke & Damtie 2017; Berihun et al. 2019; Getachew et al. 2021b; Getachew & Manjunatha 2022b). Thus, knowledge about these water balance components is the key to assessing the water resource potential, besides planning and executing the water resource development schemes in the basin (Woldegebriel et al. 2022).

Much of the available research investigated the impacts of changing climate (Mekonnen & Disse 2018; Woldesenbet et al. 2018b; Berihun et al. 2019; Mengistu et al. 2020) effects of LULC and CC change on water balance on a certain type of water balance components such as surface runoff, evapotranspiration, soil water (Legesse et al. 2003; Kim et al. 2009, 2013; Mahmood & Jia 2016; Woldesenbet et al. 2018a; Torabi et al. 2020). Furthermore, many previous studies (Kim et al. 2013; Kuhn 2014; Zeleke & Damtie 2017; Berihun et al. 2019; Getachew et al. 2021b; Getachew & Manjunatha 2022b) have used climate data obtained from national meteorological stations for baseline hydrological simulations as well as CC projections. However, this data has many missing values, which is not suitable for hydrological modeling. Thus, this study is designed to use the Climate Hazards Group Infrared Precipitation with Stations Data (CHIRPS), which minimizes missing data problems in the study area. This study's goal is to evaluate the integrated and separate impacts of changing LULC and CC on the water resources in the LTB, Ethiopia.

The LTB has an area of about 15,096 km2, which includes the lake (Figure 1). Geographically, the research region is found between 10°55′ and 12°45′ N and 36°40′ to 38°20′ E. The LTB has an extraordinary national significance. The Fogara and Debian plains of irrigation potential, hydroelectric power generation (HEP), ecotourism, livestock, and cash crops all contribute to the region's great national significance (Getachew & Manjunatha 2022a).
Figure 1

Map of the study area.

Figure 1

Map of the study area.

Close modal

The Blue Nile River originates from Lake Tana, a natural reservoir (Stave et al. 2017; Getachew et al. 2021b). The Lake, which is 66 km wide and 84 km long, is found in the nation's northwest mountains. Lake Tana has a 3,000–3,600 km2 area and is situated at a height of 1,784 m (Getachew et al. 2020). Lake Tana is a highland lake that is just 15 m deep. The Gumera, Gilgel Abay, Ribb, and Megech are Lake Tana's four main tributaries (Abtew & Dessu 2019; Getachew et al. 2021b). These rivers account for >93% of the yearly water budget of the lake.

The basin experiences an average annual precipitation of approximately 1,280 mm. It undergoes a single wet season, spanning from mid-June to mid-September, with the climate primarily influenced by the tropical highland monsoon (Getachew & Manjunatha 2022b). Despite notable daily temperature fluctuations and minimal annual and seasonal variations, the average annual temperature in the basin remains around 20 °C (Ademe et al. 2022). The basin experienced unimodal rainfall distributions.

The basin has six major soil types, namely Eutric Fluvisols, Chromic Luvisols, Lithic Leptosols, Eutric Vertisols, Haplic Luvisols, and Nitisols (Getachew et al. 2021a) (Figure 2). These basins encounter various challenges, such as hydrological alterations, invasive species, deforestation, sedimentation, soil erosion, wetland degradation, eutrophication, insufficient solid and liquid waste management, and conflicts among stakeholders (Stave et al. 2017).
Figure 2

Study area of major soil types.

Figure 2

Study area of major soil types.

Close modal

Land use change scenarios

Baseline land use maps for the research region were generated using Landsat 4–5, Landsat 7, and Landsat 8 satellite data for the years 1990, 2005, and 2020, respectively, with a spatial resolution of 30 m. Before classifying the image datasets, preprocessing of the imagery was conducted. Further details on the preprocessing can be found in Tikuye et al. (2023). Subsequently, the IDRISI Selva 17.0 software program was employed, utilizing the maximum likelihood technique, to classify the LULC data. The basin comprises seven LULC classes: Grazing lands, shrublands, forests, built-up areas, bare lands, water bodies, and farmlands. Simulations of LULC changes for the 2030s and 2070s were performed using the baseline LULC classes from 1990 to 2020.

The cellular automata (CA)-Markov chain model was employed to simulate the LULC changes for the 2030s and 2070s. Currently, LULC simulation using the CA-Markov chain model is widely used in different parts of the world (Ghosh et al. 2017; Gidey et al. 2017; Hamad et al. 2018; Beroho et al. 2023). Markov chain models assume that transition probabilities are stationary, meaning they remain constant over time, and are typically derived from historical data without considering underlying drivers of change, such as economic incentives, land suitability, and policy interventions. Additionally, they heavily depend on the quality and resolution of historical land use data. To address these limitations, the study integrated Markov chain models with CA, which can incorporate spatial dependencies, non-stationary transition probabilities, and the influence of underlying drivers and feedback mechanisms.

The preparation of various inputs was conducted before the projection of the future LULC transition. The creation of two separate basic LULC maps served as the initial input and should be utilized to create the probability of transition suitability maps (Ghosh et al. 2017). The next step was the creation of constraint and factor maps to build the necessary raster images. Details of the steps for preparation of constraints and factor maps can be found in Getachew et al. (2021b).

Climate change scenarios

Future CC data were downscaled using the medium-emission Representative Concentration Pathway (RCP4.5) and high-emission RCP8.5 from the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase Five (CMIP5). The study relies on climate projections from the CMIP5 rather than the more recent CMIP6. CMIP6 includes updated models and scenarios that reflect advancements in climate science, potentially offering more accurate and reliable climate projections, which provide a more robust foundation for impact assessments, policy-making, and adaptation strategies (Bouramdane 2023)s. However, while CMIP6 represents the latest in climate modeling, CMIP5 remains crucial for ensuring continuity, comparability, and accessibility in climate research. Its established use and comprehensive documentation make it a valuable resource for ongoing and comparative studies. The CMIP5 project relies on standardized greenhouse gas concentration trajectories known as RCPs. It assumes that external forcing factors – such as solar radiation, volcanic activity, and anthropogenic emissions – are accurately represented and drive the climate system's response (Bouramdane 2023). Additionally, the models assume they can adequately represent natural climate variability (Moss et al. 2010; van Vuuren et al. 2011).

Climate projections were generated using the Long Ashton Research Station Weather Generator (LARS-WG), utilizing five distinct GCMs (Ich et al. 2022) version 6 because it can fill gaps caused by both RCMs and GCMs (Getachew et al. 2021a). Consequently, a total of five GCMs were utilized in this study, namely MRI-CGCM3, CSIRO-MK3.6, IPSL-CM5A-MR, CanESM2, and MPI-ESM-MR. These models were selected from both the 4.5 and 8.5 RCP scenarios, resulting in a total of ten GCM runs. To assess the collective impact of these downscaled GCMs on the basin's hydrology, an ensemble mean approach was adopted. Figure 3 depicts the flow chart outlining the adopted methodology for the study.
Figure 3

Flow chart of the adopted methodology.

Figure 3

Flow chart of the adopted methodology.

Close modal

SWAT data inputs and model setup

The SWAT model incorporated various datasets including the digital elevation model (DEM), soil, discharge, weather, LULC, and soil information. Hydrological response units (HRUs), slope reclassification, and watershed delineation were all defined using the Shuttle Radar Topographic Mission (SRTM) 30-m dataset. The input soil layer data was obtained from the Ministry of Agriculture (MoA). On the other hand, baseline weather datasets were obtained from CHIRPS, while future weather datasets were downscaled using LARS-WG. The Ministry of Water, Irrigation, and Electricity (MoWIE) supplied discharge data from four stations (Gumera, Ribb, Gilgel Abay, and Megech) for the period between 1980 and 2007, which was used for the calibration and validation of the SWAT model. To address gaps in the hydrological data, linear interpolation techniques were employed to fill in the missing values. This comprehensive data collection and preprocessing ensure that the assessment is based on accurate and high-resolution information, which is crucial for the reliability of the study's outcomes. Furthermore, both the hydrological and climate models underwent careful calibration and validation steps before running the SWAT model.

In this study, the components of the water balance were determined using the SCS Curve Number and Hargreaves techniques. The model was employed to assess the potential impact of various land management techniques on water, chemical, sediment, and agricultural fields. It operates on a daily basis (Arnold et al. 1998; Arnell & Freeman 2011; Gassman et al. 2014; Döll et al. 2015; Abbaspour et al. 2018).

Model calibration and validation

The SWAT model assists in making decisions regarding various water management techniques, land use and management practices, as well as pollution control measures (Berihun et al. 2019; Getachew et al. 2021a, 2021b). This is accomplished by carefully calibrating and reducing uncertainty in the SWAT model. As a result, the Integrated Parameter Estimation and Uncertainty Analysis Tool (IPEAT) was used. IPEAT is a tool for automatically calibrating the SWAT + model (Yen et al. 2014, 2019). Thus, the model was automatically and manually calibrated over 20 years (1985–1999) using monthly streamflow at gauging stations in the Gumera, Ribb, Gilgel Abay, and Megech river basins, and data from 2000 to 2007 were used to validate the model.

The effectiveness of hydrological models is typically assessed using metrics such as the correlation coefficient (), percent bias (PBIAS), and Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) coefficient (Nash & Sutcliffe 1970; Mengistu & Sorteberg 2012; Abbaspour et al. 2018). According to (Gassman et al. 2007; Arnold et al. 2010; Mengistu & Sorteberg 2012; Abbaspour et al. 2018) the model is adequate for simulating the water balance components when NSE and R2 are >0.5 and PBAIS is <± 25%.

Calibration and validation results of the LARS-WG model

Daily data spanning from 1981 to 2010 was utilized for each station to calibrate and validate the model. Additionally, baseline data from the same period was employed to conduct site analysis and generate synthetic time series data using LARS-WG. Statistical tests such as the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) test for probability distributions, T-test for means comparison, F-test for standard deviations comparison, and R2 coefficient of determination were employed to evaluate the performance of LARS-WG in generating synthetic data compared to the baseline.

Figures 46 illustrate the calibration and validation results of the LARS-WG model for simulated versus observed temperature, as well as maximum and minimum precipitation, across stations located in Debre Tabor, Dangila, Bahir Dar, and Gonder. The findings indicated that LARS-WG performed well in accurately simulating the monthly precipitation means, maximum and minimum temperatures. According to the results of the statistical test (coefficient of determination R2), there were no significant differences between the monthly means of simulated precipitation and observations. Details of the coefficient of determination and p-values on the performance of the LARS-WG for simulating precipitation are found in Figure 4.
Figure 4

The calibration and validation results of the LARS-WG model for simulated and observed precipitation mean and standard deviation are presented for two time periods: 1981 to 2000 and 2001 to 2010.

Figure 4

The calibration and validation results of the LARS-WG model for simulated and observed precipitation mean and standard deviation are presented for two time periods: 1981 to 2000 and 2001 to 2010.

Close modal
Figure 5

The calibration and validation results of the LARS-WG model for simulated and observed standard deviation and mean of maximum temperature are presented for two time periods: (1981–2000) and (2001–2010).

Figure 5

The calibration and validation results of the LARS-WG model for simulated and observed standard deviation and mean of maximum temperature are presented for two time periods: (1981–2000) and (2001–2010).

Close modal
Figure 6

The calibration and validation results of the LARS-WG model for simulated and observed standard deviation and mean of minimum temperature are provided for the periods 1981 to 2000 and 2001 to 2010.

Figure 6

The calibration and validation results of the LARS-WG model for simulated and observed standard deviation and mean of minimum temperature are provided for the periods 1981 to 2000 and 2001 to 2010.

Close modal

Figures 5 and 6 also show a visual comparison of the minimum and maximum temperatures at the stations in Gonder, Debre Tabor, Dangila, and Bahir Dar. The model was capable of simulating these characteristics exceptionally well, and the generated data closely matched the observed historical data across all months.

Moreover, for the Bahir Dar and Gonder stations, the standard deviation between simulated and observed maximum and minimum temperatures showed good performance. However, the performance of the LARS-WG for Dangial and Debre Tabor showed relatively poor performance in terms of the standard deviation between the observed and simulated maximum and minimum temperatures. Details of the coefficient of determination (R2) and p-values on the performance of the LARS-WG for simulating maximum and minimum temperature are found in Figures 5 and 6.

Tables 1 and 2 evaluate the performance of LARS-WG in replicating seasonal and daily rainfall distribution for the LTB. The K–S test results for seasonal wet/dry series distribution of observed data across four stations Bahir Dar, Dangila, Debre Tabor, and Gonder indicate a perfect fit in all cases. For each station, data were evaluated for both wet and dry conditions across all four seasons (DJF, MAM, JJA, SON). The number of observations (N) was consistently 12 for each category. The K–S values ranged between 0.01 and 0.14, with all corresponding P-values equal to 1, leading to an assessment of a perfect fit for every season and condition at all stations. This consistency suggests that the observed data aligns extremely well with the expected distributions for each seasonal wet and dry series at these locations. Table 2 presents the K–S test results for daily rain distribution. The evaluation reveals that, except for January, February, March, and December at the Bahir Dar station, as well as January and February at the Gonder station, LARS-WG performed exceptionally well in replicating daily rainfall distributions.

Table 1

K–S test for seasonal wet/dry SERIES distribution for observed data

StationsSeasonsWet/DryNK–SP-ValueAssessmentStationsSeasonsWet/DryNK–SP-ValueAssessment
Bahir Dar DJF wet 12 0.04 Perfect fit Dangila DJF wet 12 0.09 Perfect fit 
DJF dry 12 0.09 Perfect fit DJF dry 12 0.09 Perfect fit 
MAM wet 12 0.08 Perfect fit MAM wet 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
MAM dry 12 0.08 Perfect fit MAM dry 12 0.06 Perfect fit 
JJA wet 12 0.07 Perfect fit JJA wet 12 0.04 Perfect fit 
JJA dry 12 0.04 Perfect fit JJA dry 12 0.07 Perfect fit 
SON wet 12 0.05 Perfect fit SON wet 12 0.13 Perfect fit 
SON dry 12 0.06 Perfect fit SON dry 12 0.03 Perfect fit 
Debre Tabor DJF wet 12 0.01 Perfect fit Gonder DJF wet 12 0.07 Perfect fit 
DJF dry 12 0.07 Perfect fit DJF dry 12 0.14 Perfect fit 
MAM wet 12 0.07 Perfect fit MAM wet 12 0.02 Perfect fit 
MAM dry 12 0.04 Perfect fit MAM dry 12 0.08 Perfect fit 
JJA wet 12 0.05 Perfect fit JJA wet 12 0.08 Perfect fit 
JJA dry 12 0.04 Perfect fit JJA dry 12 0.09 Perfect fit 
SON wet 12 0.06 Perfect fit SON wet 12 0.03 Perfect fit 
SON dry 12 0.06 Perfect fit SON dry 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
StationsSeasonsWet/DryNK–SP-ValueAssessmentStationsSeasonsWet/DryNK–SP-ValueAssessment
Bahir Dar DJF wet 12 0.04 Perfect fit Dangila DJF wet 12 0.09 Perfect fit 
DJF dry 12 0.09 Perfect fit DJF dry 12 0.09 Perfect fit 
MAM wet 12 0.08 Perfect fit MAM wet 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
MAM dry 12 0.08 Perfect fit MAM dry 12 0.06 Perfect fit 
JJA wet 12 0.07 Perfect fit JJA wet 12 0.04 Perfect fit 
JJA dry 12 0.04 Perfect fit JJA dry 12 0.07 Perfect fit 
SON wet 12 0.05 Perfect fit SON wet 12 0.13 Perfect fit 
SON dry 12 0.06 Perfect fit SON dry 12 0.03 Perfect fit 
Debre Tabor DJF wet 12 0.01 Perfect fit Gonder DJF wet 12 0.07 Perfect fit 
DJF dry 12 0.07 Perfect fit DJF dry 12 0.14 Perfect fit 
MAM wet 12 0.07 Perfect fit MAM wet 12 0.02 Perfect fit 
MAM dry 12 0.04 Perfect fit MAM dry 12 0.08 Perfect fit 
JJA wet 12 0.05 Perfect fit JJA wet 12 0.08 Perfect fit 
JJA dry 12 0.04 Perfect fit JJA dry 12 0.09 Perfect fit 
SON wet 12 0.06 Perfect fit SON wet 12 0.03 Perfect fit 
SON dry 12 0.06 Perfect fit SON dry 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Table 2

K–S test for daily RAIN distributions for observed data

StationsMonthNK–SP-ValueAssessmentStationsMonthNK–SP-ValueAssessment
Bahir Dar Jan 12 0.52 0.00 Poor fit Dangila Jan 12 0.22 0.56 Good fit 
Feb 12 0.61 0.00 Poor fit Feb 12 0.19 0.75 Good fit 
Mar 12 0.32 0.16 Poor fit Mar 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Apr 12 0.13 0.98 Perfect fit Apr 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
May 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit May 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Jun 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Jun 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Jul 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Jul 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Aug 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Aug 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Sep 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Sep 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Oct 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Oct 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Nov 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Nov 12 0.06 1.00 Perfect fit 
Dec 12 0.26 0.36 Poor fit Dec 12 0.14 0.96 Perfect fit 
Debre Tabor Jan 12 0.14 0.98 Perfect fit Gonder Jan 12 0.35 0.10 Poor fit 
Feb 12 0.13 0.98 Perfect fit Feb 12 0.35 0.10 Poor fit 
Mar 12 0.20 0.73 Good fit Mar 12 0.15 0.93 Perfect fit 
Apr 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Apr 12 0.13 0.98 Perfect fit 
May 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit May 12 0.13 0.98 Perfect fit 
Jun 12 0.13 0.98 Perfect fit Jun 12 0.13 0.98 Perfect fit 
Jul 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Jul 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Aug 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Aug 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Sep 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Sep 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Oct 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Oct 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Nov 12 0.20 0.73 Good fit Nov 12 0.13 0.98 Perfect fit 
Dec 12 0.21 0.66 Good fit Dec 12 0.16 0.92 Perfect fit 
StationsMonthNK–SP-ValueAssessmentStationsMonthNK–SP-ValueAssessment
Bahir Dar Jan 12 0.52 0.00 Poor fit Dangila Jan 12 0.22 0.56 Good fit 
Feb 12 0.61 0.00 Poor fit Feb 12 0.19 0.75 Good fit 
Mar 12 0.32 0.16 Poor fit Mar 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Apr 12 0.13 0.98 Perfect fit Apr 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
May 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit May 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Jun 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Jun 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Jul 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Jul 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Aug 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Aug 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Sep 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Sep 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Oct 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Oct 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Nov 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Nov 12 0.06 1.00 Perfect fit 
Dec 12 0.26 0.36 Poor fit Dec 12 0.14 0.96 Perfect fit 
Debre Tabor Jan 12 0.14 0.98 Perfect fit Gonder Jan 12 0.35 0.10 Poor fit 
Feb 12 0.13 0.98 Perfect fit Feb 12 0.35 0.10 Poor fit 
Mar 12 0.20 0.73 Good fit Mar 12 0.15 0.93 Perfect fit 
Apr 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Apr 12 0.13 0.98 Perfect fit 
May 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit May 12 0.13 0.98 Perfect fit 
Jun 12 0.13 0.98 Perfect fit Jun 12 0.13 0.98 Perfect fit 
Jul 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Jul 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Aug 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Aug 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Sep 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Sep 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Oct 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit Oct 12 0.07 1.00 Perfect fit 
Nov 12 0.20 0.73 Good fit Nov 12 0.13 0.98 Perfect fit 
Dec 12 0.21 0.66 Good fit Dec 12 0.16 0.92 Perfect fit 

Details of the LARS-WG performance using the Kolmogorov–Smirnov (K–S) test statistics and p-value in precipitation and temperature can be found in Tables 14. In line with this study, Chisanga et al. (2017) reported that LARS-WG was more capable of simulating the seasonal distributions of the wet/dry spells and the daily precipitation distributions as well as maximum and minimum temperature distributions in each month.

Table 3

K–S test for daily Tmin distributions for observed data

StationsMonthsNK–SP-ValueAssessmentStationsMonthsNK–SP-ValueAssessment
Bahir Dar Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit Dangila Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Feb 12 0.05 Perfect fit Feb 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
Mar 12 0.05 Perfect fit Mar 12 0.01 Perfect fit 
Apr 12 0.05 Perfect fit Apr 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
May 12 0.05 Perfect fit May 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Jun 12 0.05 Perfect fit Jun 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Jul 12 0.11 Perfect fit Jul 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
Aug 12 0.05 Perfect fit Aug 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Sep 12 0.05 Perfect fit Sep 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Oct 12 0.11 Perfect fit Oct 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Dec 12 0.05 Perfect fit Dec 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Debre Tabor Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit Gonder Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Feb 12 0.11 Perfect fit Feb 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Mar 12 0.05 Perfect fit Mar 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Apr 12 0.05 Perfect fit Apr 12 0.09 Perfect fit 
May 12 0.11 Perfect fit May 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Jun 12 0.05 Perfect fit Jun 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Jul 12 0.05 Perfect fit Jul 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Aug 12 0.05 Perfect fit Aug 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Sep 12 0.05 Perfect fit Sep 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Oct 12 0.05 Perfect fit Oct 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Dec 12 0.03 Perfect fit Dec 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
StationsMonthsNK–SP-ValueAssessmentStationsMonthsNK–SP-ValueAssessment
Bahir Dar Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit Dangila Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Feb 12 0.05 Perfect fit Feb 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
Mar 12 0.05 Perfect fit Mar 12 0.01 Perfect fit 
Apr 12 0.05 Perfect fit Apr 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
May 12 0.05 Perfect fit May 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Jun 12 0.05 Perfect fit Jun 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Jul 12 0.11 Perfect fit Jul 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
Aug 12 0.05 Perfect fit Aug 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Sep 12 0.05 Perfect fit Sep 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Oct 12 0.11 Perfect fit Oct 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Dec 12 0.05 Perfect fit Dec 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Debre Tabor Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit Gonder Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Feb 12 0.11 Perfect fit Feb 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Mar 12 0.05 Perfect fit Mar 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Apr 12 0.05 Perfect fit Apr 12 0.09 Perfect fit 
May 12 0.11 Perfect fit May 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Jun 12 0.05 Perfect fit Jun 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Jul 12 0.05 Perfect fit Jul 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Aug 12 0.05 Perfect fit Aug 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Sep 12 0.05 Perfect fit Sep 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Oct 12 0.05 Perfect fit Oct 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Dec 12 0.03 Perfect fit Dec 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Table 4

K–S test for daily Tmax distributions for observed data

StationsMonthsNK–SP-ValueAssessmentStationsMonthsNK–SP-ValueAssessment
Bahir Dar Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit Dangila Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Feb 12 0.11 Perfect fit Feb 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
Mar 12 0.05 Perfect fit Mar 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
Apr 12 0.05 Perfect fit Apr 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
May 12 0.11 Perfect fit May 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
Jun 12 0.05 Perfect fit Jun 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Jul 12 0.11 Perfect fit Jul 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
Aug 12 0.01 Perfect fit Aug 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Sep 12 0.05 Perfect fit Sep 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Oct 12 0.05 Perfect fit Oct 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Dec 12 0.05 Perfect fit Dec 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Debre Tabor Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit Gonder Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Feb 12 0.11 Perfect fit Feb 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Mar 12 0.05 Perfect fit Mar 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Apr 12 0.11 Perfect fit Apr 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
May 12 0.05 Perfect fit May 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Jun 12 0.05 Perfect fit Jun 12 0.01 Perfect fit 
Jul 12 0.05 Perfect fit Jul 12 0.03 Perfect fit 
Aug 12 0.05 Perfect fit Aug 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Sep 12 0.05 Perfect fit Sep 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
Oct 12 0.05 Perfect fit Oct 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Dec 12 0.05 Perfect fit Dec 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
StationsMonthsNK–SP-ValueAssessmentStationsMonthsNK–SP-ValueAssessment
Bahir Dar Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit Dangila Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Feb 12 0.11 Perfect fit Feb 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
Mar 12 0.05 Perfect fit Mar 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
Apr 12 0.05 Perfect fit Apr 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
May 12 0.11 Perfect fit May 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
Jun 12 0.05 Perfect fit Jun 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Jul 12 0.11 Perfect fit Jul 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
Aug 12 0.01 Perfect fit Aug 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Sep 12 0.05 Perfect fit Sep 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Oct 12 0.05 Perfect fit Oct 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Dec 12 0.05 Perfect fit Dec 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Debre Tabor Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit Gonder Jan 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Feb 12 0.11 Perfect fit Feb 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Mar 12 0.05 Perfect fit Mar 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Apr 12 0.11 Perfect fit Apr 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
May 12 0.05 Perfect fit May 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Jun 12 0.05 Perfect fit Jun 12 0.01 Perfect fit 
Jul 12 0.05 Perfect fit Jul 12 0.03 Perfect fit 
Aug 12 0.05 Perfect fit Aug 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Sep 12 0.05 Perfect fit Sep 12 0.11 Perfect fit 
Oct 12 0.05 Perfect fit Oct 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit Nov 12 0.05 Perfect fit 
Dec 12 0.05 Perfect fit Dec 12 0.05 Perfect fit 

Change in precipitation and temperature

The study utilized five distinct GCMs under different RCPs to project future CC trajectories. To mitigate the divergence in results due to varying emissions scenarios, the mean of these five GCMs was used for the impact analysis scenarios. For instance, Lovino et al. (2018) highlighted the importance of using an ensemble of the nine most skillful models, noting that this approach enhances the performance compared to using individual GCMs.

Unlike precipitation, mean annual maximum and minimum temperature projections from all five GCMs showed consistent increases over the 2030s and 2070s. Under the RCP4.5, the average annual maximum temperature increased by 0.3,1.0,0.75, and 1.0 °C by 2030s and 1.7, 2.4, 2.1, and 2.4 °C by 2070s at Gonder, Debre Tabor, Dangila and Bahir Dar, respectively (Figure 7). Additionally, under the RCP8.5, the ensemble mean maximum temperature tends to rise by up to 0.3, 1.8, 0.8, and 1.0 °C by 2030s and 3.9, 4.6, 4.3, and by 2070s in Gonder, Debre Tabor, Dangila, and Bahir Dar, respectively.
Figure 7

Changes in maximum temperature under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios.

Figure 7

Changes in maximum temperature under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios.

Close modal
Figure 8

Changes in minimum temperature under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios.

Figure 8

Changes in minimum temperature under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios.

Close modal

The individual and ensemble means of five GCMs have revealed an increase in the minimum temperature at the four meteorological sites, much like the maximum temperature. For instance, the ensemble average minimum temperature in Gonder, Debre Tabor, Dangila, and Bahir Dar tends to rise to 0.5, 1.8, 1.8, and 1.8 °C by 2030s and 2.0, 2.9, 2.8, and 3.4 °C by 2070s, respectively, under RCP4.5 compared to the historical period from 1981 to 2010 (Figure 8). Furthermore, under RCP8.5, the ensemble mean minimum temperature likewise increased up to 2.6, 1.4, 1.4, and 1.9 °C by the 2030s and 4.7, 5.6, 5.4, and 6.2 °C by the 2070s in Gonder, Debre Tabor, Dangila, and Bahir Dar, respectively.

Under all RCPs and models, there is no clear pattern in the yearly rainfall percentage change. Two GCMs (CanESM2 and MRI-CGCM3) overestimated the annual average rainfall compared to the baseline at Gonder, Debre Tabor, Dangila, and Bahir Dar stations by the 2030s and 2070s under RCP4.5 radiative forcing scenarios, while three GCMs (CSIRO-MK3.6.0, MPI-ESM-MR, and IPSL-CM5A-MR) underestimate the annual average rainfall at Gonder, Debre Tabor, Dangila, and Bahir Dar under RCP4.5 by the 2030s and 2070s.

By the 2030s, under RCP8.5, two GCMs (CSIRO-MK3.6.0 and MPI-ESM-MR) underestimate the mean annual rainfall, while three GCMs (CanESM2, IPSL-CM5A-MR, and MRI-CGCM3) overestimate the annual average rainfall at Bahir Dar and Debre Tabor. Besides, at Gonder and Dangila stations, one GCM (CSIRO-MK3.6.0) underestimates, while four GCMs (CanESM2, IPSL-CM5A-MR, MPI-ESM-MR, and MRI-CGCM3) overestimate the mean annual rainfall under RCP8.5 by the 2030s compared to the baseline periods. By the 2070s, three GCMs (CanESM2, IPSL-CM5A-MR, and MRI-CGCM3) exceeded the annual average rainfall at Gonder, Debre Tabor, Dangila, and Bahir Dar stations, while two GCMs (CSIRO-MK3.6.0 and MPI-ESM-MR) underestimated it.

Under the RCP4.5 compared to the baseline rainfall, the ensemble mean annual precipitation is simulated to decrease up to 3.5% and 0.63 at Debre Tabor and Bahir Dar and to increase up to 0.31 and 1.52% at Dangila and Gonder stations by the 2030s. Furthermore, under the RCP4.5, the ensemble mean annual precipitation is projected to decline by the 2070s by up to 1.1, 4.2, 2.8, and 0.41% at the Gonder, Debre Tabor, Dangila, and Bahir Dar stations, respectively.

Conversely, the ensemble means of annual precipitation under the RCP8.5 over the 2030s and 2070s time periods compared to the baseline is simulated to rise to 10.7, 4.2, 6, and 7.5% by the 2030s at Gonder, Debre Tabor, Dangila, and Bahir Dar stations, respectively. Furthermore, precipitation is also projected to increase up to 18.6, 13.82, 13.73, and 17.74% under RCP8.5 by the 2070s period at Gonder, Debre Tabor, Dangila, and Bahir Dar, respectively compared to the baseline (Figure 9).
Figure 9

Changes in precipitation under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios.

Figure 9

Changes in precipitation under the RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 scenarios.

Close modal

Simulation of land use change

Understanding Earth's biophysical processes necessitates proficiency in land cover classification and mapping (Anderson et al. 1976). Consequently, the research region is categorized into seven major land use classifications. Figure 10 presents the projected LULC for the 2070s and 2100s alongside classified maps of the basin for 1990, 2005, and 2020. The accuracy of the 2020 LULC maps was assessed, yielding a kappa coefficient of 90.8% and user accuracies of 89.3%. Details of the accuracy assessment can be found in Getachew et al. (2021b).
Figure 10

Spatial distribution of 1990, 2005, 2020, 2070, and 2100 land use/land cover of the Lake Tana Basin.

Figure 10

Spatial distribution of 1990, 2005, 2020, 2070, and 2100 land use/land cover of the Lake Tana Basin.

Close modal

During the classification of LULC in the basin (Figure 10), seven classes were identified: water bodies, shrublands, grazing lands, forests, built-up areas, barren lands, and agricultural lands. As indicated in Table 5, the percentage of built-up, cultivated land, and forested land increased, while the percentage of barren land, water bodies, and grazing lands decreased (Getachew & Manjunatha 2022b). A baseline land use map for 2020 was projected using data from the 1990 to 2005 maps. Additionally, major drivers such as open water bodies, rivers, highways, elevation, slope, and urban variables were considered when simulating future land use changes.

Table 5

Lake Tana Basin land use/land cover in (in km2 and %) in 1990, 2005, 2020, 2070, and 2100 time slices

Land use/cover classes% of baseline LULC
% of projected LULC
1990
2005
2020 2019
2070
2100
km2%km2%km2%km2%km2%
Water bodies 3,167.3 20.476 3,260.1033 21.07587 3,258.279 21.064044 3,258.279 21.06404 3,158.279 20.41757 
Shrublands 1,217.2 7.869 875.4078 5.659323 895.3524 5.788253 895.3524 5.788253 895.3524 5.788253 
Grazing lands 1,924.1 12.439 1250.8409 8.086417 541.2654 3.49916 541.2654 3.49916 441.2654 2.852682 
Forests 372.8 2.411 126.2475 0.816163 345.1734 2.231469 345.1734 2.231469 445.1734 2.877946 
Built-ups 5.9 0.038 140.4036 0.907679 527.6349 3.411041 527.6349 3.411041 627.6349 4.057519 
Bare lands 11.6 0.075 35.4159 0.228956 10.6434 0.068807 10.6434 0.068807 10.6434 0.068807 
Cultivated lands 8,769.4 56.692 9,780 63.2256 9,890.095 63.937246 9,890.095 63.93725 9890.095 63.93725 
Land use/cover classes% of baseline LULC
% of projected LULC
1990
2005
2020 2019
2070
2100
km2%km2%km2%km2%km2%
Water bodies 3,167.3 20.476 3,260.1033 21.07587 3,258.279 21.064044 3,258.279 21.06404 3,158.279 20.41757 
Shrublands 1,217.2 7.869 875.4078 5.659323 895.3524 5.788253 895.3524 5.788253 895.3524 5.788253 
Grazing lands 1,924.1 12.439 1250.8409 8.086417 541.2654 3.49916 541.2654 3.49916 441.2654 2.852682 
Forests 372.8 2.411 126.2475 0.816163 345.1734 2.231469 345.1734 2.231469 445.1734 2.877946 
Built-ups 5.9 0.038 140.4036 0.907679 527.6349 3.411041 527.6349 3.411041 627.6349 4.057519 
Bare lands 11.6 0.075 35.4159 0.228956 10.6434 0.068807 10.6434 0.068807 10.6434 0.068807 
Cultivated lands 8,769.4 56.692 9,780 63.2256 9,890.095 63.937246 9,890.095 63.93725 9890.095 63.93725 

Before projecting two future periods, the simulated LULC maps were calibrated and validated using the research area's 2020 baseline/reference LULC maps. The projected and baseline LULC classes showed minimal differences. Various Kappa indices (KIA) and related statistics were utilized to quantify the degree of agreement between the baseline and projected maps.

Based on the Kappa values obtained during the validation procedure (K standard = 0.81, Kno = 0.87, and K location = 0.88), there was a strong agreement between the projected and baseline maps, indicating the accuracy of the model prediction (Beroho et al. 2023). Future simulation maps for the 2070s and 2100s were generated using the CA-Markov chain model. The projection indicated that an increase in cultivated land and settlements will lead to a reduction in certain land use types, such as forests, grazing lands, and shrublands (Getachew et al. 2021a).

The LULC data from 1990 to 2100 show substantial changes across different classes. Water bodies increased slightly from 20.48 in 1990 to 21.08 in 2005 and remained relatively stable through 2020 at 21.06, but are projected to decrease to 20.42 by 2100. Grazing lands experienced a sharp decline from 12.44 in 1990 to 8.09 in 2005, and further down to 3.50 by 2020, with a continued decrease to 2.85 by 2100. Forests initially decreased from 2.41 in 1990 to 0.82 in 2005, but are expected to recover to 2.23 by 2020 and increase to 2.88 by 2100.

Built-up areas expanded significantly from 0.04 in 1990 to 0.91 in 2005, and surged to 3.41 by 2020, with projections reaching 4.06 by 2100. Cultivated lands steadily increased from 56.69 in 1990 to 63.23 in 2005 and 63.94 in 2020, maintaining this level through 2100 (Figure 10 and Table 5). These trends reflect ongoing urbanization and agricultural expansion, alongside efforts in reforestation, impacting ecosystem management and land use planning in the future.

SWAT model calibration and validation

The SWAT model was calibrated by comparing 1985–1999 monthly streamflow simulations to observations. The model was warmed via discharge data from 1980 to 1984. Figure 11 displays the model calibration and validation results. High-flow rivers like Gumera and Gilgel Abay performed better than low-flow rivers during validation and calibration (such as Megech and Ribb). Details of the SWAT+ model can be found in (Getachew et al. 2021b; Getachew & Manjunatha 2022b).
Figure 11

Variations in monthly streamflows simulated and observed over the 1985–2007 calibration and validation periods.

Figure 11

Variations in monthly streamflows simulated and observed over the 1985–2007 calibration and validation periods.

Close modal

The model performance assessment focused on the parameters REVAL_MIN, REVAL_CO, FLOW_MIN, ALPHA, DELAY, ESCO, AWC, and CN2. Sensitivity analysis of these parameters is essential for reducing parameter dimensions and calibration time. Sensitive hydrological parameters were calibrated through sensitivity analysis to achieve satisfactory agreement between model-simulated and observed values. Calibration used streamflow data, and the SWAT model's performance was evaluated using percent bias (PBIAS), the correlation coefficient (), and the NSE.

The model's output at all four gauge stations is satisfactory. The R2 and NSE values revealed the model was adequate for the Gumera, Megech, Ribb, and Gilgel Abay rivers. The negative PBIAS result demonstrated that the model's projected values for the four rivers were greater than those observed during validation and calibration. The calibrated model could replicate streamflow in the LTB, and a model with more parameters might help modify how the streamflow will react to LULC and CC changes (Table 6 and Figure 11). Consequently, earlier research has supported the effectiveness of the SWAT paradigm (Chu et al. 2004; Setegn et al. 2008; Dile et al. 2013; Gebremicael et al. 2013; Döll et al. 2016; Fentaw et al. 2018; Gebrechorkos et al. 2019).

Table 6

Results of IPEAT validation and calibration for the Megech, Gilgel Abay, Ribb, and Gumera rivers

RiversObjective function
Calibration
Validation
NSER2PBIASNSER2PBIAS
Gilgel Abay 0.712 0.80 −15.545% 0.72 0.80 −14.53 
Gumera 0.60 0.63 −13.5% 0.63 0.77 −24.5 
Megech 0.53 0.72 −24.01% 0.51 0.58 −25.0 
Ribb 0.62 0.64 −24.5% 3.73 0.55 −23.6 
RiversObjective function
Calibration
Validation
NSER2PBIASNSER2PBIAS
Gilgel Abay 0.712 0.80 −15.545% 0.72 0.80 −14.53 
Gumera 0.60 0.63 −13.5% 0.63 0.77 −24.5 
Megech 0.53 0.72 −24.01% 0.51 0.58 −25.0 
Ribb 0.62 0.64 −24.5% 3.73 0.55 −23.6 

Impact assessment framework

The water balance of the LTB to CC and LULC change was evaluated for three future time windows: the 2030s (2021–2050) and the 2070s (2071–2100). The 1981–2010 time frame serves as the baseline/ reference. Three modeling scenarios were created. Thus, S1 just examines LULC, S2 only considers CC, and S3 analyses both (the combination of S1 and S2).

Effects of land use and land cover change on Lake Tana Basin water resources

LULC modification altered various hydrological components under two LULC change scenarios by the 2030s (2021–2050) and 2070s (2071–2100). Thus, this scenario considered the effects of S1 on runoff, streamflow, lateral flow, percolation, water yield, soil water, AET, and PET. Figure 12 shows how the LULC change affected Lake Tana hydrology. In the 2030s and 2070s, dry season lateral flow, water yield, runoff, actual evapotranspiration (AET), and potential evapotranspiration (PET) (Risley et al. 2011) are simulated to decrease. During the basin's dry season, percolation, water yield, lateral flow, streamflow, and soil water are projected to rise in the middle and end of the 21st century. AET and PET decrease throughout the basin's small wet season compared to baseline periods.
Figure 12

Impacts of LULC change on seasonal hydrological components.

Figure 12

Impacts of LULC change on seasonal hydrological components.

Close modal

Throughout the dry season (ONDJF), streamflow increased by 30.5–32.7%; however, it decreased by 6.8 and 2.8% through the short rainy season (MAM) and by 2.8 and 3.8% through the major rainy season (JJAS) by the 2030s and 2070s, respectively (Figure 12). During the MAM and JJAS months of the basin, the water flow in the stream dropped, whereas it increased during the ONDJF months. During the dry and short rainy season, runoff increased by 21.4 and 24.0%, 10.4 and 16.9%, respectively, while during the rainy season, it decreased by 2.0 and 1.8%, respectively, by the 2030s and 2070s periods (Figure 12).

Under a potential LULC change scenario, runoff, lateral flow, water yield, and percolation follow similar patterns. Hence, these hydrological components decrease through the wet season, whereas they increase through the dry and short wet seasons. All of these variables have a direct relationship with the projected variation in precipitation in the basin. Similarly, precipitation would increase throughout the dry and short seasons while decreasing through the wet season.

In Figure 13, the spatial difference of the annual average change in the hydrological components is shown under future LULC changes. In the Southeastern part of the watershed, streamflow, percolation, water yield, lateral flow, runoff, and soil water tend to decline up to 40%, while in other parts of the basin, streamflow, percolation, water yield, lateral flow, runoff, and soil water tend to increase up to 60%. The spatial variation of PET and AET under S1 has shown a similar pattern. Hence, both components tend to increase in all parts of the basin.
Figure 13

Spatial distribution of hydrological components under land use and land cover (LULC) change.

Figure 13

Spatial distribution of hydrological components under land use and land cover (LULC) change.

Close modal

The average streamflow, runoff, lateral flow, water yield, and soil water in a particular section of the basin tend to increase by 10, 10, 10, 60, and 20%, respectively (Figure 13). Additionally, streamflow, runoff, water yield, lateral flow, and soil water tend to decline up to 10, 10, 5, 40, and 0.5% in other parts of the basin, while percolation tends to decline up to 2% in all parts of the LTB. Unlike the other portions of the water balance, PET and AET tend to increase by 0.25 and 10%, respectively, in the whole basin.

Impacts of climate change on Lake Tana Basin water resources

This section assesses how CC alone affects AET, PET, percolation, runoff, and streamflow. The result of the S2 scenario is shown in Figure 14. As shown in Figure 14, AET and PET were likely to rise by 6–26.5% and 3–22.5% under the RCP4.5 scenario and by 6.5–32.1% and 6–22.5% under the RCP8.5 scenario by the 2030s and 2070s periods, respectively. Simulations showed no consistent pattern among hydrological components. RCP4.5 and RCP8.5 of 2030s and 2070s enhance runoff and water yield during short and dry seasons.
Figure 14

Impact of climate change on seasonal hydrological components.

Figure 14

Impact of climate change on seasonal hydrological components.

Close modal

Figure 14 depicts the mean seasonal anomaly of water yield, lateral flow, streamflow, and runoff under S2 scenarios. The aforementioned hydrological parameters will increase in the future throughout dry and short rainy seasons but relatively decline through the rainy season of the basin. Even though the pattern of change has a similar trend, the degree of change is different for each hydrological component. For instance, the flow of stream tends to increase from 0.6 to 42.0% in the 4.5 RCP and from 1.7 to 55.3% in the 8.5 RCP by the 2030s and 2070s periods under both the dry and short rainy seasons of the basin but decline through the main rainy season.

The basin's dry and main wet seasons reduce lateral flow and percolation. These components rise throughout the basin's short rainy season due to increased rainfall. However, all RCPs and periods decrease basin soil water compared to the baseline. All RCPs and periods enhance actual and PET during the small, main, and dry season months. Evapotranspiration increased in all months due to higher temperatures.

Figure 15 depicts the spatial distribution of evapotranspiration under projected climatic change. The north part of the basin has had the highest evapotranspiration increase, while the southwest of the LTB has seen the lowest evapotranspiration change. The spatial distribution of streamflow, water yield, lateral flow, runoff, and lateral flow is shown in Figure 15. As shown on the map, streamflow, water yield, lateral flow, runoff, and lateral flow tend to decline to 15, 20, 10, and 15% in certain portions of the basin. Furthermore, streamflow, runoff, lateral flow, and water yield tend to increase by up to 20, 20, 6, and 25%, respectively, in certain parts of the basin. The findings indicated that percolation, soil water, and evaporation are expected to increase under all seasons.
Figure 15

Spatial distribution of hydrological components under climate change.

Figure 15

Spatial distribution of hydrological components under climate change.

Close modal

Combined impact of climate and land use changes on Lake Tana Basin water resources

Figure 16 displays the seasonal variation of runoff, lateral flow, water yield, and streamflow in the LTB under the S3 scenario. As illustrated by Figure 16, lateral flow, runoff, water yield, and streamflow all increased during dry and short rainy seasons, but they tend to decrease during the rainy season. In contrast, percolation and soil water tend to rise in the basin throughout all periods and seasons.
Figure 16

Effects of climate LULC change on seasonal water balance components.

Figure 16

Effects of climate LULC change on seasonal water balance components.

Close modal

Figure 16 displays the seasonal variation in AET and PET because of S3 change. The results indicated that evapotranspiration would rise in all seasons and periods. For instance, AET and PET tend to rise by 25 and 16%, respectively, under the RCP8.5 at the end of the 21st century.

The spatial variation of hydrological components under combined S3 change is shown in Figure 17. Depending on the region of the basin, streamflow, runoff, lateral flow, percolation, soil water, and water yield tend to rise by 25, 30, 15, 35, 20, and 20%, respectively.
Figure 17

Spatial distribution of hydrological components under land use and climate change.

Figure 17

Spatial distribution of hydrological components under land use and climate change.

Close modal

This study investigated the separate and dual effects of LULC and CC using the SWAT model. Consequently, model input parameters were also generated using LARS-WG for climate and CA-Markov chain for LULC simulation. Multiple data sources were used to get input factors like hydrometeorological variables, soil data, DEM-SRTM data, and LULC, which were applied to simulate the hydrological response of the LTB as closely as possible. GCMs are employed to examine changes in various precipitation attributes, including spatial extent, timing, duration, frequency, and intensity of precipitation events. Nevertheless, biases and uncertainties in GCMs limit their accuracy and performance in simulating these attributes across different regions (Getachew et al. 2021b; Abbas et al. 2022).

To develop small-scale adaptation plans, large-scale GCM data were downscaled for the basin to account for the effects of changing climate on water resources. In this study, Wilby & Dawson (2013) said that downscaling GCMs to a small-scale level enhances the effectiveness of modeling the hydrological effects of changing climate and enables the implementation of suitable adaptation methods. This research also uses CHIRPS data for the simulation of the baseline hydrological model as well as the downscaling of GCMs CMIP5 models. The finding indicated that there is good agreement between baseline climate data and downscaled historical climate which indicates highly dependable satellite data products for hydrological analysis. In this respect, Du Plessis & Kibii (2021) indicate that CHIRPS data correlate well with observed monthly rainfall data for all stations used, having an average coefficient of determination of 0.6 and bias of 0.95 and recommended its applicability for hydrological analysis in South Africa.

Significant changes have occurred in the mean annual maximum and minimum temperatures, as well as precipitation, during the 2030s and 2070s. Under the RCP8.5, the ensemble mean annual maximum temperature tends to rise by up to 1.2 °C by the 2030s and 4.3 °C by the 2070s while the minimum temperature likewise increased up to 5.5 °C by the 2070s in the basin, respectively. Precipitation is also simulated to rise to 16% under RCP8.5 by the 2070s periods in the LTB. The results are in line with other studies conducted in Ethiopia and East Africa (EPCC 2015; Birara et al. 2018; Gebrechorkos et al. 2019). This finding aligns with other findings made by (WWF 2006; IPCC 2013; Gebrechorkos et al. 2019), in East Africa which projects rainfall might increase by up to 20%. A decline in precipitation along with an increase in temperature would have a significant effect on energy, water, and agriculture. On the other hand, an increase in rain during the short rainy season is needed to prepare the soil and seed crops that take a long time to mature and enhance irrigation in the LTB.

This finding also confirmed that seasonal variability in rainfall has shown considerable changes in the water balance components of the basin rather than cumulative CC. In line with this study, Silva-Júnior et al. (2021) indicated that the effects of changes in hydrology show strong spatial and temporal variations due to variability in climatic factors such as precipitation and watershed heterogeneity. According to Konapala et al. (2020), patterns of water availability, which have implications for ecosystems and human civilization, are influenced by both seasonal and annual mean precipitation and evaporation.

Bekele et al. (2021) reported that temperature and precipitation have been increasing, resulting in constant streamflow variability. Moreover, there is a notable seasonal shift from the existing primary rainfall period (June to September) to an earlier onset (January to May) with less pronounced peaks. This shift results in a longer duration of the rainfall season in the Blue Nile Basin under current CC scenarios. Cherie (2013) and Dile et al. (2013) reported that since most of Ethiopia's crops are grown in the summer and spring, CC may help the country's rain-fed agriculture, even though it hurts evapotranspiration because both the highest and lowest temperatures are rising. Furthermore, Abbas et al. (2022, 2023) indicated that the reduction in winter precipitation in Pakistan has substantial consequences for crop water needs, river flow, and various sectors, including industrial and domestic applications. According to Singh & Kumar (2018), the UBNRB will likely grow wetter and warmer in the 2050s due to CC. Beyene et al. (2010) revealed that, contrary to the results of other studies, summer rainfall may increase. Gebrechorkos et al. (2020) also indicated that streamflow and soil–water balance conditions are impacted by projected increases in evaporation in Ethiopia, which in turn affect agricultural output, hydropower output, and ecosystem services.

These findings suggest that streamflow, soil water, runoff, and lateral flow are projected to increase in future periods due to the influence of climate and land use change in both medium- and high-emission scenarios (RCP 4.5 and RCP 8.5) in the LTB, particularly during dry and short rainy seasons. However, during the basin's main rainy season, streamflow, soil water, surface runoff, and lateral flow are expected to decrease. Additionally, AET, PET, percolation, and soil water are predicted to increase during the dry, short, and main rainy seasons.

This study revealed that changes in climate and LULC had substantial impacts on the response of hydrological components of the LTB. Hence, the integrated impacts of CC and land use change on hydrological response are higher than the separate impacts of each scenario. According to this research, Woldesenbet et al. (2018a) and Aredehey et al. (2020) reported that CC would have a larger effect on hydrological components than the LULC change. On the other hand, Cuo et al. (2013) stated that changes in LULC are more likely to have an effect on basin hydrology than CC. Tan et al. (2022) also reported that both CC and LULC change reduced the streamflow in all eight estuaries, and the impact of LULC change was slightly larger than that of CC. Singh & Kumar (2018) claim that low flow is the result of climate and LULC change-related consequences. Paul & Rashid (2017) also suggested that the dual effects of LULC and climate will amplify hydrological changes in the James River. Furthermore, it revealed that the dual impacts of climate and LULC change would have greater effects on hydrological components than each cause acting alone (Setegn et al. 2011; Talib & Randhir 2017; Tariku et al. 2020).

Increasing water yield, soil water, percolation, and lateral flow are favorable for the basin to support its agriculture-based economy and to supply the energy demand of its fast-growing population. During the dry season, lateral flow is large and one of the primary sources of streamflow. Lateral flow is essential during the dry season for maintaining ecological water needs and irrigation, which can aid in mitigating drought (Liu et al. 2015; Getachew et al. 2021b). According to the findings, it is likely that lateral flow, water yield, soil water, and percolation will rise in the LTB, especially during the short and dry seasons. During the short wet and dry seasons, baseflow will likely contribute more to streamflow. Thus, it will likely contribute more to streamflow during a short and dry season.

Using the SWAT model, the study examined the combined and independent effects of LULC changes and climate on the hydrology of the LTB. LULC and CC projections were generated using CA-Markov chains and LARS-WG, respectively. Both models accurately replicated the climate and land use characteristics of the basin. The results indicated a tendency for the mean annual maximum and minimum temperatures in the basin to increase in the upcoming periods, particularly when considered alongside precipitation.

Using the CA-Markov chain, a future LULC change simulation indicated that cultivated and built-up areas are projected to increase, whereas forests, shrubland, and grassland areas are likely to decline in the future. This will increase evaporation, baseflow, streamflow, water yield, soil water, and AET and PET of the basin.

Changes in LULC are simulated to have a bearing on the water balance of the LTB in the 2030s and 2070s, possibly increasing streamflow, lateral flow, water yield, and soil water while decreasing AET and PET. In addition, CC is projected to enhance AET, PET, lateral flow, streamflow, percolation, water yield, and soil water by the 2030s and 2070s. Furthermore, the integrated effects of CC and LULC have a larger effect on the response of hydrological components of the basin than their separate impacts. Therefore, understanding the integrated impacts of climate and land use change on hydrological responses should be a prerequisite for the planning and implementation of water resource management strategies in the basin.

Uncertain predictions regarding land use change can affect various hydrological processes, including runoff, infiltration, and groundwater recharge. Consequently, this uncertainty impacts the quantity, timing, and quality of water available in river basins and aquifers. Moreover, uncertainties in climate projections increase the vulnerability of water resources to extreme weather events like storms, floods, and droughts. In essence, the uncertainty surrounding projections of land use change and CC significantly hinders the assessment and management of water resources.

The SWAT model effectively simulated the separate and integrated impacts of climate and land use change on the hydrology of the LTB. Even though the research covered both individual and combined effects on the water balance of the LTB, CMIP5 GCMs were considered. The whole impact of CC must therefore be determined through the latest model simulations, such as CMIP6, of shared socio-economic scenarios from the SWAT simulations. It is thought that the multiple and most recent GCM ensembles will make models less uncertain about how water will react. When managing water resources, it is essential to examine how LULC and the changing climate may impact the water balance of the basin. To offset the impacts of the rapidly changing climate on the river basin, climate-resilient management practices must also be used, as follows:

Promote the adoption of water-saving strategies such as rainwater collection, water recycling, and efficient irrigation to mitigate the impacts of reduced precipitation. Diversify water sources by investing in alternatives like desalination, groundwater recharge, and wastewater reuse to reduce dependence on precipitation-dependent sources. Additionally, prioritize the restoration and protection of natural ecosystems such as watersheds, wetlands, and forests, as they play a crucial role in regulating water flow, preventing floods, and replenishing groundwater.

Implement land use planning regulations that prioritize sustainable land management practices, including measures to reduce urban sprawl, conserve farmland, and protect riparian areas. Invest in green infrastructure solutions, such as artificial wetlands, green roofs, and permeable pavements, to mitigate the impacts of changing land use on water quantity and quality. Enforce laws and policies, such as stormwater management guidelines, riparian buffer zone standards, and erosion control strategies, to address the effects of land use on water resources and ensure sustainable management practices are upheld.

Furthermore, the findings of this study validate that the CHIRPS produces hydrological simulations that are more reliable. Thus, it is recommended to be used for any research efforts that could be used to model hydrological responses, drought analysis, and water resources management.

We extend our gratitude to the National Meteorological Services Agency of Ethiopia and the Hydrology Department of the Ministry of Water, Irrigation, and Electricity of Ethiopia, as well as the Ministry of Agriculture, for generously providing the meteorological data, discharge data, and soil data, respectively. We also appreciate the assistance of the United States Geological Survey (USGS) and https://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/ for facilitating the download of elevation and Landsat data.

B.G.T. has contributed to the design, processing, and analysis of data, sample design, evaluation, interpretation of results, and manuscript revisions. The manuscript was edited, commented on, and given ideas along the writing process by M.T. and K.G. The final manuscript was read and approved by all writers.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Abbas
A.
,
Waseem
M.
,
Ullah
W.
,
Zhao
C.
&
Zhu
J.
2021
Spatiotemporal analysis of meteorological and hydrological droughts and their propagations
.
Water
13
,
2237
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w13162237
.
Abbas
A.
,
Ullah
S.
,
Ullah
W.
,
Waseem
M.
,
Dou
X.
,
Zhao
C.
,
Karim
A.
,
Zhu
J.
,
Hagan
D. F. T.
,
Bhatti
A. S.
&
Ali
G.
2022
Evaluation and projection of precipitation in Pakistan using the coupled model intercomparison project phase 6 model simulations
.
International Journal of Climatology
42
,
6665
6684
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.7602
.
Abbas
A.
,
Ullah
S.
,
Ullah
W.
,
Zhao
C.
,
Karim
A.
,
Waseem
M.
,
Bhatti
A. S.
,
Ali
G.
,
Jan
M. A.
&
Ali
A.
2023
Characteristics of winter precipitation over Pakistan and possible causes during 1981–2018
.
Water
15
,
2420
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132420
.
Abtew
W.
&
Dessu
S. B.
2019
The Grand Ethiopian Renaissance Dam on the Blue Nile
.
Springer International Publishing
,
Cham
, p.
179
.
Ademe
D.
,
Alamirew
T.
&
Andualem
T. G.
2022
Precipitation and Temperature Trends Over the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia
, p.
16
.
Adhikari
U.
,
Nejadhashemi
A. P.
&
Woznicki
S. A.
2015
Climate change and Eastern Africa: A review of impact on major crops
.
Food Energy Secur
4
,
110
132
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/fes3.61
.
Anderson
J. R.
,
Hardy
E. E.
,
Roach
J. T.
&
Witmer
R. E.
1976
A Land Use and Land Cover Classification System for Use with Remote Sensor Data. Geological Survey Professional Paper 964
.
US Government Printing Office
,
Washington, DC
.
Aredehey
G.
,
Mezgebu
A.
&
Girma
A.
2020
The effects of land use land cover change on hydrological flow in Giba catchment, Tigray, Ethiopia
.
Cogent Environmental Science
6
,
1785780
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/23311843.2020.1785780
.
Arnell
N. W.
&
Freeman
A.
2011
The impact of climate change on policy-relevant indicators of temperature extremes in the United Kingdom
. In:
Climate Resilience and Sustainability
.
doi: 10.1002/cli2.12
.
Arnold
J. G.
,
Srinivasan
R.
,
Muttiah
R. S.
&
Williams
J. R.
1998
Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development
.
Journal of the American Water Resources Association
34
(
1
),
73
89
.
doi:10.1111/j.1752-1688.1998.tb05961.x
.
Arnold
J. G.
,
Allen
P. M.
,
Volk
M.
,
Williams
J. R.
&
Bosch
D. D.
2010
Assessment of different representations of spatial variability on SWAT model performance
.
Transactions of the ASABE
53
,
1433
1443
.
doi:10.13031/2013.34913
.
Aryal
J. P.
,
Sapkota
T. B.
,
Rahut
D. B.
,
Marenya
P.
&
Stirling
C. M.
2021
Climate risks and adaptation strategies of farmers in East Africa and South Asia
.
Scientific Reports
11
,
10489
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89391-1
.
Awulachew
S. B.
,
McCartney
M.
,
Steenhuis
T. S.
&
Ahmed
A. A.
2008
A Review of Hydrology, Sediment and Water Resource use in the Blue Nile Basin
.
International Water Management Institute
,
Colombo, Sri Lanka
, p.
87
.
(IWMI Working Paper 131)
.
Bekele
D.
,
Alamirew
T.
,
Kebede
A.
,
Zeleke
G.
&
Melesse
A. M.
2021
Modeling the impacts of land use and land cover dynamics on hydrological processes of the Keleta watershed, Ethiopia
.
Sustainable Environment
7
,
883
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2021.1947632
.
Berihun
M. L.
,
Tsunekawa
A.
,
Haregeweyn
N.
,
Meshesha
D. T.
,
Adgo
E.
,
Tsubo
M.
,
Masunaga
T.
,
Fenta
A. A.
,
Sultan
D.
,
Yibeltal
M.
&
Ebabu
K.
2019
Hydrological responses to land use/land cover change and climate variability in contrasting agro-ecological environments of the Upper Blue Nile basin, Ethiopia
.
The Science of the Total Environment
689
,
347
365
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.338
.
Beroho
M.
,
Briak
H.
,
Cherif
E. K.
,
Boulahfa
I.
,
Ouallali
A.
,
Mrabet
R.
,
Kebede
F.
,
Bernardino
A.
&
Aboumaria
K.
2023
Future scenarios of Land Use/Land Cover (LULC) based on a CA-Markov simulation model: Case of a Mediterranean watershed in Morocco
.
Remote Sensing
15
,
1162
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15041162
.
Beyene
T.
,
Lettenmaier
D. P.
&
Kabat
P.
2010
Hydrologic impacts of climate change on the Nile River Basin: Implications of the 2007 IPCC scenarios
.
Climatic Change
100
,
433
461
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9693-0
.
Birara
H.
,
Pandey
R. P.
&
Mishra
S. K.
2018
Trend and variability analysis of rainfall and temperature in the Tana basin region, Ethiopia
.
Journal of Water and Climate Change
9
,
555
569
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2018.080
.
Broderick
C.
,
Matthews
T.
,
Wilby
R. L.
,
Bastola
S.
&
Murphy
C.
2016
Transferability of hydrological models and ensemble averaging methods between contrasting climatic periods
.
Water Resources Research
52
,
8343
8373
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016WR018850
.
Chanapathi
T.
&
Thatikonda
S.
2020
Investigating the impact of climate and land-use land cover changes on hydrological predictions over the Krishna river basin under present and future scenarios
.
The Science of the Total Environment
721
,
137736
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137736
.
Cherie
N. Z.
2013
. Downscaling and Modeling the Effects of Climate Change on Hydrology and Water Resources in the Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia
.
PhD Thesis
,
University of Kassel
,
Germany
, p.
329
.
Chu
T. W.
,
Shirmohammadi
A.
,
Montas
H.
&
Sadeghi
A. M.
2004
Evaluation of the SWAT model's sediment and nutrient components in the Piedmont physiographic region of Maryland
.
Transactions of the ASABE
47
(
5
),
1523
1538
.
Cuo
L.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Gao
Y.
,
Hao
Z.
&
Cairang
L.
2013
The impacts of climate change and land cover/use transition on the hydrology in the upper Yellow River Basin, China
.
Journal of Hydrology
502
,
37
52
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.08.003
.
Das
B.
,
Jain
S.
,
Singh
S.
&
Thakur
P.
2019
Evaluation of multisite performance of SWAT model in the Gomti River Basin, India
.
Applied Water Science
9
(
5
),
1340
.
doi: 10.1007/s13201-019-1013-x
.
Dile
Y. T.
,
Berndtsson
R.
&
Setegn
S. G.
2013
Hydrological response to climate change for Gilgel Abay River, in the Lake Tana Basin -Upper Blue Nile Basin of Ethiopia
.
PloS One
8
,
e79296
.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0079296
.
Döll
P.
,
Jiménez-Cisneros
B.
,
Oki
T.
,
Arnell
N. W.
,
Benito
G.
,
Cogley
J. G.
, Jiang, T., Kundzewwicz, S., Mwakalila, S. & Nishijima, A.
2015
Integrating risks of climate change into water management, Hydrological Sciences Journal, DOI: 10.1080/02626667.2014.967250Geophysics, 37(2), 195–221. doi:10.1007/s10712-015-9343-1. Hydrological Sciences Journal 60, 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2014.967250
.
Döll
P.
,
Douville
H.
,
Güntner
A.
,
Müller Schmied
H.
&
Wada
Y.
2016
Modelling freshwater resources at the global scale: Challenges and prospects
.
Surveys in Geophysics
37
(
2
),
195
221
.
doi:10.1007/s10712-015-9343-1
.
Du Plessis
J. A.
&
Kibii
J. K.
2021
Applicability of CHIRPS-based satellite rainfall estimates for South Africa
.
Journal of the South African Institution of Civil Engineering
63
,
1
12
.
https://doi.org/10.17159/2309-8775/2021/v63n3a4
.
Easterling
D. R.
,
Meehl
G. A.
,
Parmesan
C.
,
Changnon
S. A.
,
Karl
T. R.
&
Mearns
L. O.
2000
Climate extremes: Observations, modeling, and impacts
.
Science
289
,
5487
.
doi: 10.1126/science.289.5487.2068
.
Elahi
E.
,
Li
G.
,
Han
X.
,
Zhu
W.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Cheng
A.
&
Yang
Y.
2024
Decoupling livestock and poultry pollution emissions from industrial development: A step towards reducing environmental emissions
.
Journal of Environmental Management
350
,
119654
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119654
.
EPCC
2015
(Ethiopian Panel on Climate Change):First Assessment Report, Working Group I Physical Science Basis, Published by the Ethiopian Academy of Sciences., 117 pp
.
Feng
X.
,
Porporato
A.
&
Rodriguez-Iturbe
I.
2013
Changes in rainfall seasonality in the tropics
.
Nature Clim Change
3
,
811
815
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1907
.
Fentaw
F.
,
Hailu
D.
,
Nigussie
A.
&
Melesse
A. M.
2018
Climate change impact on the hydrology of Tekeze Basin, Ethiopia: Projection of rainfall-runoff for future water resources planning
.
Water Conservation Science and Engineering
3
,
267
278
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s41101-018-0057-3
.
Fowler
A.
1999
Potential climate change impacts on water resources in the Auckland Region (New Zealand). Vol. 11: 221–245, 1999CLIMATE RESEARCH Clim Res
.
Gassman
P. W.
,
Reyes
M. R.
,
Green
C. H.
&
Arnold
J. G.
2007
The soil and water assessment tool: Historical development, applications, and future research directions
.
Transactions of the ASABE
50
(
4
),
1211
1250
.
doi:10.13031/2013.23637
.
Gassman
P. W.
,
Sadeghi
A. M.
&
Srinivasan
R.
2014
Applications of the SWAT model special section: overview and insights
.
Journal of Environmental Quality
43
,
1
8
.
https://doi.org/10.2134/jeq2013.11.0466
.
Gebrechorkos
S. H.
,
Bernhofer
C.
&
Hülsmann
S.
2019
Impacts of projected change in climate on water balance in basins of East Africa
.
The Science of the Total Environment
682
,
160
170
.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.05.053
.
Gebrechorkos
S. H.
,
Bernhofer
C.
&
Hülsmann
S.
2020
Climate change impact assessment on the hydrology of a large river basin in Ethiopia using a local-scale climate modelling approach
.
The Science of the Total Environment
742
,
140504
.
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140504
.
Gebremicael
T. G.
,
Mohamed
Y. A.
,
Betrie
G. D.
,
van der Zaag
P.
&
Teferi
E.
2013
Trend analysis of runoff and sediment fluxes in the Upper Blue Nile basin: A combined analysis of statistical tests, physically-based models and landuse maps
.
Journal of Hydrology
482
,
57
68
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.12.023
.
Getachew
B.
&
Manjunatha
B. R.
2021
Climate change projections and trends simulated from the CMIP5 models for the Lake Tana sub-basin, the Upper Blue Nile (Abay) River Basin, Ethiopia
.
Environmental Challenges
5
,
100385
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envc.2021.100385
.
Getachew
B.
&
Manjunatha
B. R.
2022a
Impacts of land-use change on the hydrology of Lake Tana Basin, Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia
.
Global Challenges (Hoboken, NJ)
6
,
2200041
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/gch2.202200041
.
Getachew
B.
&
Manjunatha
B. R.
2022b
Potential climate change impact assessment on the hydrology of the Lake Tana Basin, Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia
.
Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Parts A/B/C
127
,
103162
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pce.2022.103162
.
Getachew
H. E.
&
Melesse
A. M.
2012
The impact of land use change on the hydrology of the Angereb Watershed, Ethiopia
.
Int. J. Water Sci.
1
.
https://doi.org/10.5772/56266
.
Getachew
B.
,
Manjunatha
B. R.
&
Gangadhara Bhat
H.
2020
Spatio-temporal distribution of aerosol optical depth and cloud properties over Lake Tana Basin, Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia
.
Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment
20
,
100401
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2020.100401
.
Getachew
B.
,
Manjunatha
B. R.
&
Bhat
G. H.
2021a
Assessing current and projected soil loss under changing land use and climate using RUSLE with Remote sensing and GIS in the Lake Tana Basin, Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia
.
The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Science
24
,
907
918
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2021.10.001
.
Getachew
B.
,
Manjunatha
B. R.
&
Bhat
H. G.
2021b
Modeling projected impacts of climate and land use/land cover changes on hydrological responses in the Lake Tana Basin, upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia
.
Journal of Hydrology
595
,
125974
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.125974
.
Ghosh
P.
,
Mukhopadhyay
A.
,
Chanda
A.
,
Mondal
P.
,
Akhand
A.
,
Mukherjee
S.
,
Nayak
S. K.
,
Ghosh
S.
,
Mitra
D.
,
Ghosh
T.
&
Hazra
S.
2017
Application of Cellular automata and Markov-chain model in geospatial environmental modeling- A review
.
Remote Sensing Applications: Society and Environment
5
,
64
77
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rsase.2017.01.005
.
Gidey
E.
,
Dikinya
O.
,
Sebego
R.
,
Segosebe
E.
&
Zenebe
A.
2017
Cellular automata and Markov Chain (CA_Markov) model-based predictions of future land use and land cover scenarios (2015–2033) in Raya, northern Ethiopia
.
Modeling Earth Systems and Environment
3
,
1245
1262
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40808-017-0397-6
.
Gosling
S. N.
&
Arnell
N. W.
2016
A global assessment of the impact of climate change on water scarcity
.
Climatic Change
134
(
3
),
371
385
.
DOI: 10.1007/s10584-013-0853-x
.
Hamad
R.
,
Balzter
H.
&
Kolo
K.
2018
Predicting land use/land cover changes using a CA-Markov model under two different scenarios
.
Sustainability
10
,
3421
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103421
.
Hayhoe
K.
,
Wuebbles
D. J.
,
Easterling
D. R.
,
Fahey
D. W.
,
Doherty
S.
,
Kossin
J. P.
,
Sweet
W. V.
,
Vose
R. S.
&
Wehner
M. F.
2018
Our Changing Climate. In Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II [Reidmiller, D.R., C.W. Avery, D.R. Easterling, K.E. Kunkel, K.L.M. Lewis, T.K. Maycock, and B.C. Stewart (eds.)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, pp. 72–144. doi: 10.7930/NCA4.2018.CH2., 73 pp
.
He
S.
,
Guo
S.
,
Liu
Z.
,
Yin
J.
,
Chen
K.
&
Wu
X.
2018
Uncertainty analysis of hydrological multi-model ensembles based on CBP-BMA method
.
Hydrology Research
49
,
1636
1651
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2018.160
.
Hu
S.
2021
Refining El Niño projections
.
Nature Climate Change
11
,
724
725
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-021-01126-2
.
Ich
I.
,
Sok
T.
,
Kaing
V.
,
Try
S.
,
Chan
R.
&
Oeurng
C.
2022
Climate change impact on water balance and hydrological extremes in the lower Mekong basin: A case study of Prek Thnot River Basin, Cambodia
.
Journal of Water and Climate Change
13
,
2911
2939
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2022.051
.
IPCC
2013
Summary for policymakers
. In:
Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(
Stocker
T. F.
,
Qin
D.
,
Plattner
G.-K.
,
Tignor
M.
,
Allen
S. K.
,
Boschung
J.
,
Nauels
A.
,
Xia
Y.
,
Bex
V.
&
Midgley
P. M.
, eds).
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, United Kingdom
.
New York, New York, USA
.
IPCC
.
2014
Summary for policymakers
. In:
Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(
Field
C. B.
,
Barros
V. R.
,
Dokken
D. J.
,
Mach
K. J.
,
Mastrandrea
M. D.
,
Bilir
T. E.
,
Chatterjee
M.
,
Ebi
K. L.
,
Estrada
Y. O.
,
Genova
R. C.
,
Girma
B.
,
Kissel
E. S.
,
Levy
A. N.
,
MacCracken
S.
,
Mastrandrea
P. R.
&
White
L. L.
, eds).
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, United Kingdom
.
and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1-32., 34 pp
.
IPCC
2022a
Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability
. In:
Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
(
Pörtner
H.-O.
,
Roberts
D. C.
,
Tignor
M.
,
Poloczanska
E. S.
,
Mintenbeck
K.
,
Alegría
A.
,
Craig
M.
,
Langsdorf
S.
,
Löschke
S.
,
Möller
V.
,
Okem
A.
&
Rama
B.
, eds).
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge, UK
.
and New York, NY, USA, 3056 pp., doi:10.1017/9781009325844., 3068 pp
.
IPCC
2022b
Summary for Policymakers [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, M. Tignor, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem (eds.)]. In: Climate Change 2022: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, M. Tignor, E.S. Poloczanska, K. Mintenbeck, A. Alegría, M. Craig, S. Langsdorf, S. Löschke, V. Möller, A. Okem, B. Rama (eds.)]. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 3–33, doi:10.1017/9781009325844.001., 34 pp
.
Jia
G.
,
Shevliakova
E.
,
Artaxo
P.
,
De Noblet-Ducoudré
N.
,
Houghton
R.
,
House
J.
,
Kitajima
K.
,
Lennard
C.
,
Popp
A.
,
Sirin
A.
,
Sukumar
R.
&
Verchot
L.
2022
Land–climate interactions. In: Climate Change and Land: an IPCC special report on climate change, desertification, land degradation, sustainable land management, food security, and greenhouse gas fluxes in terrestrial ecosystems [P.R. Shukla, J. Skea, E. Calvo Buendia, V. Masson-Delmotte, H.-O. Pörtner, D.C. Roberts, P. Zhai, R. Slade, S. Connors, R. van Diemen, M. Ferrat, E. Haughey, S. Luz, S. Neogi, M. Pathak, J. Petzold, J. Portugal Pereira, P. Vyas, E. Huntley, K. Kissick, M, Belkacemi, J. Malley, (eds.)]. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009157988.004, in: Change, I.P.o.C. (Ed.), Climate Change and Land. Cambridge University Press, pp. 131–248
.
Jose
D. M.
,
Vincent
A. M.
&
Dwarakish
G. S.
2022
Improving multiple model ensemble predictions of daily precipitation and temperature through machine learning techniques
.
Scientific Reports
12
,
4678
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08786-w
.
Kaushal
S. S.
,
Gold
A. J.
&
Mayer
P. M.
2017
Land use, climate, and water resources-global stages of interaction
.
Water
9
,
1
10
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w9100815
.
Kim
U.
,
Kaluarachchi
J. J.
&
Smakhtin
V. U.
2009
Climate Change Impacts on Hydrology and Water Resources of the Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia
.
International Water Management Institute
,
Colombo, Sri Lanka
, p.
27
.
(IWMI Research Report 126)
.
Kim
J.
,
Choi
J.
,
Choi
C.
&
Park
S.
2013
Impacts of changes in climate and land use/land cover under IPCC RCP scenarios on streamflow in the Hoeya River Basin, Korea
.
The Science of the Total Environment
452–453
,
181
195
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.02.005
.
Konapala, G., Mishra, A. K., Wada, Y. & Mann, M. E. 2020 Climate change will affect global water availability through compounding changes in seasonal precipitation and evaporation. Nature Communications 11, 3044.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16757-w.
Kuhn
C.
2014
Modeling Rainfall-Runoff Using SWAT in A Small Urban Wetland;Tests of Scale for the Soil and Water Assessment Tool Hydrology Model
.
Kundzewicz
Z. W.
2008
Climate change impacts on the hydrological cycle
.
Ecohydrology & Hydrobiology
8
,
195
203
.
https://doi.org/10.2478/v10104-009-0015-y
.
Lee
T.
&
Singh
V. P.
2018
Statistical Downscaling for Hydrological and Environmental Applications
.
Taylor & Francis CRC Press
,
Boca Raton
.
Legesse
D.
,
Vallet-Coulomb
C.
&
Gasse
F.
2003
Hydrological response of a catchment to climate and land use changes in Tropical Africa: Case study South Central Ethiopia
.
Journal of Hydrology
275
,
67
85
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00019-2
.
Li
Y.
,
Chang
J.
,
Luo
L.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Guo
A.
,
Ma
F.
&
Fan
J.
2019
Spatiotemporal impacts of land use land cover changes on hydrology from the mechanism perspective using SWAT model with time-varying parameters
.
Hydrology Research
50
,
244
261
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2018.006
.
Li
S.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Elahi
E.
,
Meng
X.
&
Deng
W.
2023
A new type of urbanization policy and transition of low-carbon society: A ‘local- neighborhood’ perspective
.
Land Use Policy
131
,
106709
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106709
.
Liu
D.
,
Chang
J.
,
Tian
F.
,
Huang
Q.
&
Meng
X.
2015
Analysis of baseflow index based hydrological model in Upper Wei River basin on the Loess Plateau in China
.
Proc. IAHS
368
,
403
408
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/piahs-368-403-2015
.
Liu
X.
,
Tang
Q.
,
Cui
H.
,
Mu
M.
,
Gerten
D.
,
Gosling
S.
,
Masaki
Y.
,
Satoh
Y.
&
Wada
Y.
2017
Multimodel uncertainty changes in simulated river flows induced by human impact parameterizations
.
Environmental Research Letters : ERL [Web Site]
12
.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aa5a3a
.
Liu
X.
,
Liu
W.
,
Yang
H.
,
Tang
Q.
,
Flörke
M.
,
Masaki
Y.
,
Müller Schmied
H.
,
Ostberg
S.
,
Pokhrel
Y.
,
Satoh
Y.
&
Wada
Y.
2019
Multimodel assessments of human and climate impacts on mean annual streamflow in China
.
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
23
,
1245
1261
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-23-1245-2019
.
Lovino
M. A.
,
Müller
O. V.
,
Berbery
E. H.
&
Müller
G. V.
2018
Evaluation of CMIP5 retrospective simulations of temperature and precipitation in northeastern Argentina
.
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
38
,
57
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5441
.
Mekonnen
D. F.
&
Disse
M.
2018
Analyzing the future climate change of Upper Blue Nile River basin using statistical downscaling techniques
.
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
22
,
2391
2408
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-2391-2018
.
Melesse
A. M.
,
Abtew
W.
&
Setegn
S. G.
2014
Nile River Basin: Ecohydrological Challenges, Climate Change and Hydropolitics
.
Springer International Publishing
,
Cham
, p.
702
.
Mengistu
D. T.
&
Sorteberg
A.
2012
Sensitivity of SWAT simulated streamflow to climatic changes within the Eastern Nile River basin
.
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
16
(
2
),
391
407
.
doi:10.5194/hess-16-391-2012
.
Mengistu
D.
,
Bewket
W.
,
Dosio
A.
&
Panitz
H.-J.
2020
Climate change impacts on water resources in the Upper Blue Nile (Abay) River Basin, Ethiopia
.
Journal of Hydrology
2020
.
https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125614
.
Moss
R. H.
,
Edmonds
J. A.
,
Hibbard
K. A.
,
Manning
M. R.
,
Rose
S. K.
,
van Vuuren
D. P.
,
Carter
T. R.
,
Emori
S.
,
Kainuma
M.
,
Kram
T.
,
Meehl
G. A.
,
Mitchell
J. F. B.
,
Nakicenovic
N.
,
Riahi
K.
,
Smith
S. J.
,
Stouffer
R. J.
,
Thomson
A. M.
,
Weyant
J. P.
&
Wilbanks
T. J.
2010
The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment
.
Nature
463
,
747
756
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08823
.
Paul
B. K.
&
Rashid
H.
2017
Land use change and coastal management
. In:
Climatic Hazards in Coastal Bangladesh
(Paul, B. K. & Rashid, H., eds.).
Elsevier, Amsterdam
, pp.
183
207
.
Pooralihossein
S.
&
Delavar
M.
2020
A multi-model ensemble approach for the assessment of climatic and anthropogenic impacts on river flow change
.
Hydrological Sciences Journal
65
,
71
86
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2019.1682148
.
Risley
J.
,
Moradkhani
H.
,
Hay
L.
&
Markstrom
S.
2011
Statistical comparisons of watershed-scale response to climate change in selected basins across the United States
.
Earth Interactions
15
,
1
26
.
https://doi.org/10.1175/2010EI364.1
.
Seiller
G.
,
Anctil
F.
&
Perrin
C.
2012
Multimodel evaluation of twenty lumped hydrological models under contrasted climate conditions
.
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
16
,
1171
1189
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-16-1171-2012
.
Serdeczny
O.
,
Adams
S.
,
Baarsch
F.
,
Coumou
D.
,
Robinson
A.
,
Hare
W.
&
Reinhardt
J.
2017
Climate change impacts in Sub-Saharan Africa: From physical changes to their social repercussions
.
Regional Environmental Change
17
,
1585
1600
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0910-2
.
Setegn
S. G.
,
Srinivasan
R.
&
Dargahi
B.
2008
Hydrological modelling in the Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia using SWAT model
.
The Open Hydrology Journal
2008
(
2
),
49
62
.
Setegn
S. G.
,
Rayner
D.
,
Melesse
A. M.
,
Dargahi
B.
&
Srinivasan
R.
2011
Impact of climate change on the hydroclimatology of Lake Tana Basin, Ethiopia
.
Water Resources Research
47
(
4
),
1340
.
doi: 10.1029/2010WR009248
.
Shrestha
S.
,
Bae
D.-H.
,
Hok
P.
,
Ghimire
S.
&
Pokhrel
Y.
2021
Future hydrology and hydrological extremes under climate change in Asian river basins
.
Scientific Reports
11
,
17089
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-96656-2
.
Silva-Júnior
R. O. d.
,
Souza-Filho
P. W. M. e.
,
Salomão
G. N.
,
Tavares
A. L.
,
Santos
J. F. d.
,
Santos
D. C.
,
Dias
L. C.
,
Silva
M. S. d.
,
Melo
A. M. Q. d.
,
Costa
C. E. A. d. S.
&
Rocha
E. J. P. d.
2021
Response of water balance components to changes in soil use and vegetation cover over three decades in the Eastern Amazon
.
Frontiers in Water
3
,
988
.
https://doi.org/10.3389/frwa.2021.749507
.
Singh
U. K.
&
Kumar
B.
2018
Climate change impacts on hydrology and water resources of Indian River basin
.
Curr. World Environ
13
,
32
43
.
https://doi.org/10.12944/CWE.13.1.04
.
Srivastava
A.
,
Deb
P.
&
Kumari
N.
2020
Multi-Model approach to assess the dynamics of hydrologic components in a tropical ecosystem
.
Water Resources Management
34
,
327
341
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-019-02452-z
.
Stave
K.
,
Goshu
G.
&
Aynalem
S.
2017
Social and Ecological System Dynamics
.
Springer International Publishing
,
Cham
.
Stute
M.
,
Clement
A.
&
Lohmann
L.
2000
Global climate models: Past, present, and future. Available from
:
www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.191366098
.
Tabari
H.
2020
Climate change impact on flood and extreme precipitation increases with water availability
.
Scientific Reports
10
,
13768
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-70816-2
.
Talib
A.
&
Randhir
T. O.
2017
Climate change and land use impacts on hydrologic processes of watershed systems
.
Journal of Water and Climate Change
8
,
363
374
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2017.064
.
Tan
X.
,
Liu
S.
,
Tian
Y.
,
Zhou
Z.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Jiang
J.
&
Shi
H.
2022
Impacts of climate change and land Use/Cover change on regional hydrological processes: Case of the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area
.
Frontiers in Environmental Science
9
,
413
.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2021.783324
.
Tariku, T.B., Gan, T.G., F.ASCE, Li, J., Qin, X., 2020. Impact of Climate Change on Hydrology and Hydrologic Extremes of Upper Blue Nile River Basin.J. Water Resour. Plann. Manage., 2021, 147(2): 04020104
.
Taye
M. T.
,
Willems
P.
&
Block
P.
2015
Implications of climate change on hydrological extremes in the Blue Nile basin: A review
.
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
4
,
280
293
.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.07.001
.
Tikuye
B. G.
,
Gill
L.
,
Rusnak
M.
&
Manjunatha
B. R.
2023
Modelling the impacts of changing land use and climate on sediment and nutrient retention in Lake Tana Basin, Upper Blue Nile River Basin, Ethiopia
.
Ecological Modelling
482
,
110383
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2023.110383
.
Torabi
H. A.
,
Darabi
H.
,
Shahedi
K.
,
Solaimani
K.
&
Kløve
B.
2020
A scenario-based approach for assessing the hydrological impacts of land use and climate change in the marboreh watershed, Iran
.
Environ Model Assess
25
,
41
57
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10666-019-09665-x
.
USGCRP
2018
Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States: Fourth National Climate Assessment, Volume II: [Reidmiller, D.R., C.W. Avery, D.R. Easterling, K.E. Kunkel, K.L.M. Lewis, T.K. Maycock, and B.C. Stewart (eds.)]. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, 1515 pp. doi: 10.7930/NCA4.2018., 1526 pp
.
van Vuuren
D. P.
,
Edmonds
J.
,
Kainuma
M.
,
Riahi
K.
,
Thomson
A.
,
Hibbard
K.
,
Hurtt
G. C.
,
Kram
T.
,
Krey
V.
,
Lamarque
J.-F.
,
Masui
T.
,
Meinshausen
M.
,
Nakicenovic
N.
,
Smith
S. J.
&
Rose
S. K.
2011
The representative concentration pathways: An overview
.
Climatic Change
109
,
5
31
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-011-0148-z
.
Waseem
M.
,
Khurshid
T.
,
Abbas
A.
,
Ahmad
I.
&
Javed
Z.
2022
Impact of meteorological drought on agriculture production at different scales in Punjab, Pakistan
.
Journal of Water and Climate Change
13
,
113
124
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2021.244
.
Wilby
R. L.
&
Dawson
C. W.
2013
The statistical downScaling model: Insights from one decade of application
.
International Journal of Climatology
33
,
1707
1719
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.3544
.
Wilby
R. L.
,
Dawson
C. W.
&
Barrow
E. M.
2002
. sdsm – a decision support tool for the assessment of regional climate change impacts
.
Environmental Modelling & Software
17
(
2002
),
147
159
.
Woldesenbet
T. A.
,
Elagib
N. A.
,
Ribbe
L.
&
Heinrich
J.
2018a
Catchment response to climate and land use changes in the Upper Blue Nile sub-basins, Ethiopia
.
The Science of the Total Environment
644
,
193
206
.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.06.198
.
Woldesenbet
T. A.
,
Elagib
N. A.
,
Ribbe
L.
&
Heinrich
J.
2018b
Hydrological responses to land use/cover changes in the source region of the Upper Blue Nile Basin, Ethiopia
.
Science of the Total Environment
575
,
724
741
.
doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.09.124
.
Woldegebriel
T.
,
Garg
V.
,
Gupta
P. K.
,
Srivastav
S. K.
&
Ranjan
R.
2022
Ethiopia's water resources: An assessment based on geospatial data-driven distributed hydrological modeling approach
.
Journal of the Indian Society of Remote Sensing
50
,
1031
1049
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-022-01511-0
.
WWF
2006
WWF-World Wide Fund For Nature: Climate Change Impacts on East Africa
.
Yen
H.
,
Wang
X.
,
Fontane
D. G.
,
Harmel
R. D.
&
Arabi
M.
2014
A framework for propagation of uncertainty contributed by parameterization, input data, model structure, and calibration/validation data in watershed modeling
.
Environmental Modelling & Software
54
,
211
221
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2014.01.004
.
Yen
H.
,
Park
S.
,
Arnold
J. G.
,
Srinivasan
R.
,
Chawanda
C. J.
,
Wang
R.
,
Feng
Q.
,
Wu
J.
,
Miao
C.
,
Bieger
K.
,
Daggupati
P.
,
van Griensven
A.
,
Kalin
L.
,
Lee
S.
,
Sheshukov
A. Y.
,
White
M. J.
,
Yuan
Y.
,
Yeo
I.-Y.
,
Zhang
M.
&
Zhang
X.
2019
IPEAT + : A built-in optimization and automatic calibration tool of SWAT +
.
Water
11
,
1681
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081681
.
Zeleke
T. T.
,
Damtie
B.
,
2017
Temporal and spatial climate variability and trends over abay (Blue Nile) River Basin
. In:
Social and Ecological System Dynamics
, Vol.
15
(
Stave
K.
,
Goshu
G.
&
Aynalem
S.
, eds).
Springer International Publishing
,
Cham
, pp.
59
75
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).