Climate and land use are two major factors that influence stream flow, especially in developing countries. This paper assesses potential changes to stream flow by considering future climate and land use in the Nam Xong watershed. The logistic regression method was applied to predict future land use in the study area. The predicted major change to land use was the conversion of wood and shrub land to agricultural land in the middle part of the Nam Xong watershed. The conversion to agricultural land, including tree plantations, is expected to increase in the future. Yet protecting forest areas and limiting deforestation is local policy. A hydrological model was applied to estimate daily stream flow, 222 m3/s in the wet season and 32 m3/s in the dry season, for the entire Nam Xong watershed. The scenario comparison showed that stream flow will decrease due to climate and land use changes over the next 20 years, especially in the middle part of the Nam Xong watershed where water is transferred to the Nam Ngum Reservoir. Here, stream flow will decrease by 11.7–12.2%; the overall figure for the watershed is 0.7–1.9%. Our results indicate that water management in the middle part of the Nam Xong watershed should be carefully considered.

Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR) is a landlocked country in south-east Asia. It has an abundance of water resources and natural resources (Nam Ngum River Basin Sector Development Project (NNRBSDP) 2008a, 2008b). As a developing country, most of its people rely on natural resources. Farming and shifting cultivation have resulted in land cover changes in the last 30 years, while war and increasing urbanization have damaged the land (Ministry of Forestry & Agriculture (MAF) 2005). Moreover, climate change affects this region as Lao PDR is located in the Lower Mekong Basin, which is almost always hot, often humid, and is classified as tropical monsoonal (Hoanh et al. 2010). In previous decades, climate models were used to investigate different world climates. Nowadays, modern technology (SEA START RC 2006) allows us to make predictions about regional climates and run simulations according to various criteria and scenarios. These results can be applied at a regional level (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 2007).

Land use affects stream flow, especially in developing countries (Takamatsu et al. 2012). The relationship between land change and hydrology is complex. Land cover and use directly affect the amount of evaporation, groundwater infiltration and overland run-off (Bosch & Hewlett 1982), as well as altering water demand, particularly in agricultural areas (Kawasaki et al. 2010; Zawawi et al. 2010). These factors control the water yields of surface streams and groundwater aquifers and, thus, the amount of water available for ecosystem function and human use (Mustard & Fisher 2004). Major changes to the land, such as deforestation and the expansion of agricultural and urban areas, affect local and regional hydrological processes (Sahin & Hall 1996; Takamatsu et al. 2012). Changes in land use and climate, and increasing water demand, are critical factors affecting water resources in watersheds in Lao PDR. These factors have the potential to change stream flows, meaning there is a need for critical water resources planning and management (Lyle & Boualapha 2011).

Changes to land use are influenced by population and economic growth. Over the last 10 years in the Nam Xong watershed in Lao PDR, forested areas have been replaced by urban and agricultural areas. A policy aimed at stopping ‘slash and burn’ practices by 2010 was imposed on the rural population, but studies show that some villages, especially in the highlands, continue to ‘slash and burn’ (Miaillier 2007). In addition, land use change is closely linked to water demand: more land under agriculture and a larger population lead to higher water demand, especially in the dry season (Kawasaki et al. 2010; Takamatsu et al. 2012).

An integrated watershed-scale hydrologic model is a good water resources planning tool. In developing countries, where water resources management is a big challenge with increasing pressure due to human activities and uncertainty of climate change, such a tool can be practically used to assess the hydrological impact of future watershed development scenarios even if data availability is relatively limited. Extensive research has been conducted to study future stream flows under different scenarios. However, those studies have sometimes considered only one factor such as land use change (Parvateesam 1996; Calder 2000; Kawasaki et al. 2010; Ly 2010) or climate change (Jha et al. 2004; Eastham et al. 2008; Chingchanagool 2011; Mango et al. 2011; Lauri et al. 2012). For improved watershed management and planning, all major potential impacts on a watershed should be evaluated. This study used an integrated approach to predict future stream flows considering both the impacts of land use and climate change. Climate data were applied on a local scale. Various scenarios were generated in order to assess changes in stream flow. Statistical techniques and geographic information system (GIS) were used to forecast land use change. This allowed for comprehensive scientific predictions, as opposed to conventional approaches which are based on numerous assumptions. The results of this study can be used to support better planning and decision-making at a local level.

The Nam Xong watershed covers an area of 1,804 km2 and is the second largest sub-watershed of the 18 that make up the Nam Ngum watershed (Nam Ngum River Basin Sector Development Project (NNRBSDP) 2008a, 2008b). Located in the central part of northern Lao PDR between 18°38′58″ N–19°17′10″ N and 102°13′37″ E–102°37′57″ E, the Nam Xong watershed is 83 km north of Vientiane Capital (Figure 1); 97.3% of the watershed's area, and 100% of its population, are in Vientiane province. The central and largest city in the basin is Vangvieng, well-known for its tourist attractions. The altitude of the watershed ranges from 2,169 to 175 m above sea level, where the Nam Xong flows south to join the Nam Lik, 3 km upstream from Hinhurb. Geologically, the watershed consists of a mixture of limestone and sandstone. In the northern mountains, the land is dominated by limestone. To the south and east of Vangvieng, the land is mostly alluvial plains and sandstone. The topography of the northern region of the basin is extreme, with slopes exceeding more than 30 ° in some areas. The alluvial plains at Vangvieng and toward the Nam Lik are flat flood plains which support agriculture (Nam Ngum River Basin Sector Development Project (NNRBSDP) 2009).
Figure 1

Location of Nam Xong watershed.

Figure 1

Location of Nam Xong watershed.

Close modal

Observed data

Primary data were collected from relevant organizations such as the Department of Meteorology and Hydrology, Department of Forestry (DoF), the Department of Energy (DoE), the National Agricultural and Forestry Research Institute (NAFRI), and the Mekong River Commission Secretariat (MRCS). Secondary data were obtained from literature, such as the forestry strategy of stopping ‘slash and burn’ practices (Ministry of Forestry & Agriculture (MAF) 2005), rate of water use (Water Supply Authority 2007), and growth rate of population (United Nations 2010). Most data were sourced from the MRCS, with future climate data from SEA-START RC (Hoanh et al. 2010). The detail of data sources is shown in Table 1. Within the study area, data from three weather stations were used: Kasy, Vangvieng and Hinhurb (Figure 1). At each station, rainfall data were recorded for different periods. Temperature data were recorded only at Vangvieng station. Information on other climate parameters recorded at Vangvieng station is in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) database 2009. For each station, data were prepared for the current period (1990–2009) and future period (2011–2030).

Table 1

Descriptions of scenarios

CodeNameDescriptionCondition
BL Baseline of hydrological condition Current situation of stream flow in Nam Xong River, under current conditions period 1990–2009; used to compare with other scenarios Climate 1990–2009; Land use 2008; Water use 1990–2009 
Sc1 A2 climate change condition Future situation of stream flow in Nam Xong River, under changing of climate in A2 climate family of SRES only Climate in 2011–2030; Land use 2008; Water use 2011–2030 (b) 
Sc2 B2 climate change condition Future situation of stream flow in Nam Xong River, under changing of climate in B2 climate family of SRES only Climate in 2011–2030; Land use 2008; Water use 2011–2030 (c) 
Sc3 Land use change condition Future situation of stream flow in Nam Xong River, under changing of land use in 2030 only Climate 1990–2009; Land use 2030; Water use 2011–2030 (a) 
Sc4 Future land use change and A2 climate change Future situation of stream flow in Nam Xong River, under changing of climate in A2 and future land use Climate 2011–2030; Land use 2030; Water use 2011–2030 (b) 
Sc5 Future land use change and B2 climate change Future situation of stream flow in Nam Xong River, under changing of climate in B2 and future land use Climate 2011–2030; Land use 2030; Water use 2011–2030 (c) 
CodeNameDescriptionCondition
BL Baseline of hydrological condition Current situation of stream flow in Nam Xong River, under current conditions period 1990–2009; used to compare with other scenarios Climate 1990–2009; Land use 2008; Water use 1990–2009 
Sc1 A2 climate change condition Future situation of stream flow in Nam Xong River, under changing of climate in A2 climate family of SRES only Climate in 2011–2030; Land use 2008; Water use 2011–2030 (b) 
Sc2 B2 climate change condition Future situation of stream flow in Nam Xong River, under changing of climate in B2 climate family of SRES only Climate in 2011–2030; Land use 2008; Water use 2011–2030 (c) 
Sc3 Land use change condition Future situation of stream flow in Nam Xong River, under changing of land use in 2030 only Climate 1990–2009; Land use 2030; Water use 2011–2030 (a) 
Sc4 Future land use change and A2 climate change Future situation of stream flow in Nam Xong River, under changing of climate in A2 and future land use Climate 2011–2030; Land use 2030; Water use 2011–2030 (b) 
Sc5 Future land use change and B2 climate change Future situation of stream flow in Nam Xong River, under changing of climate in B2 and future land use Climate 2011–2030; Land use 2030; Water use 2011–2030 (c) 

Notes: (a) average domestic water use 1990–2009 and average irrigation water use 1990–2009 with additional irrigation area; (b) average domestic water use 2011–2030 and average irrigation water use 2011–2030 under climate A2 scenario with additional irrigation area; and (c) average domestic water use 2011–2030 and average irrigation water use 2011–2030 under climate B2 scenario with additional irrigation area.

Overall process

Figure 2 shows the overall process for stream flow estimation. Data on land use, including water use and climate conditions, were prepared for the SWAT model and five different scenarios (Table 2). A climate change scenario was generated by downscaling global climate model (GCM) using the PRECIS model. This provided a set of data from selected stations (Hoanh et al. 2010). Precipitation and temperature change trends were calculated, while weather data for each sub-watershed were calculated using the Thiessen polygon method. For the purposes of this paper, the Nam Xong watershed was divided into three sub-watersheds: the upper part; the middle part, where water is diverted to Nam Ngum I reservoir; and the lower part, where the final outlet of the Nam Xong River is found. Three other sub-watersheds from the Nam Lik watershed were added in order to calibrate the results of the simulation at Hinhurb station. This step helped to confirm the accuracy of the results for the whole Nam Xong River watershed (Hoanh et al. 2010).
Table 2

Data sources

Dataset nameData formatSources
Rainfall Table DMH 
Discharge at Hinhurb station Table DMH 
Discharge at Nam Xong diversion Table DoE 
Land use in 1997 and 2008 Polygon DoF 
National conservation and protection forest area Polygon DoF 
Soil type Grid NAFRI 
DEM, location of villages, road network, stream network, watershed and administration boundaries, and population Grid, Point, Polyline, Polygon MRCS 
Future climate (SRES A2 and B2) Table MRCS 
SWAT database 2009 of Lower Mekong Basin Table MRCS 
Dataset nameData formatSources
Rainfall Table DMH 
Discharge at Hinhurb station Table DMH 
Discharge at Nam Xong diversion Table DoE 
Land use in 1997 and 2008 Polygon DoF 
National conservation and protection forest area Polygon DoF 
Soil type Grid NAFRI 
DEM, location of villages, road network, stream network, watershed and administration boundaries, and population Grid, Point, Polyline, Polygon MRCS 
Future climate (SRES A2 and B2) Table MRCS 
SWAT database 2009 of Lower Mekong Basin Table MRCS 
Figure 2

Overall process of the assessment.

Figure 2

Overall process of the assessment.

Close modal

Land use change model

This paper applied an integrated approach using statistical analysis of historical trends in land use. Types of land use were compared and contrasted to find out the probability of conversion from one type of use to another (Shahidul & Ahmed 2011). By referring to previous change trends, areas where land use is predicted to change in the future can be determined. Variables such as distance from a stream, distance from a main road, population density, elevation, slope range, and policy (whether it is a local conservation area or concession area, for example) were used to forecast future land use (Verburg et al. 2004, 2005; de Nijs 2009). The ROC (relative operating characteristic) curve was applied to evaluate the accuracy of fit of the logistic regression model (Verburg et al. 2004).

The classification of land use is different in each period. Therefore, land use data from 1997 and 2008 were grouped into five categories: (1) forest land; (2) agricultural land; (3) wood and shrub land; (4) grassland; and (5) other (small areas where land use does not fall within one of the four previous categories) in order to assess trends in changing land use in the Nam Xong watershed. The detail of grouped land use is shown in Table 3. Figure 3 shows the overall process of land use prediction. Distance to rivers and streams, distance to major roads, and existing agriculture density are important factors in deciding whether to turn land to agriculture (Kamusoko et al. 2011). Predicted agriculture density was tested at radiuses of 1, 3, 5, 10, 15 and 20 km. Different variables, such as elevation, slope, and population density, were incorporated into multivariate logistic regression models to gain more insight into other factors that affect specific land use change rates. A dependent variable was set for areas of land where land use changed (Takamatsu et al. 2012). In addition, government forestry and land use policies were considered. It is Lao PDR policy to ban ‘slash and burn’; cultivators will be encouraged to find new occupations (Ministry of Forestry & Agriculture (MAF) 2005). Moreover, proper forest management and land allocation will ensure that temporary crop fields will be controlled and limited in future (Takahashi & Liang 2010). Thus, temporary crop fields will revert to woodlands and shrub land. However, the possibility also exists for degraded areas and temporary crop fields to be converted to agricultural plantations, an option that has been strongly supported by the Lao government (Ministry of Forestry & Agriculture (MAF) 2007).
Table 3

Land use type categorization

Land use categories 1997Land use categories 2008Land use group used in this paper
Dense forest, Forest mosaic, Forest open, Regrowth Closed evergreen forest, Mosaic of closed and open evergreen forest, Mosaic of semi-evergreen forest blocks, Open/disturbed evergreen forest, Secondary forest, semi-evergreen forest, semi-evergreen forest, open/disturbed cover Forest land 
Agriculture land, Mosaic of cropping, Rice paddy Mosaic of shifting cultivation/cropping and other vegetation cover < 30%, Mosaic of shifting cultivation/cropping and other vegetation cover > 30%, Permanent paddy field, Upland and perennial crop Agricultural land 
Wood and shrubland Evergreen wood and shrubland Wood and shrubland 
Grassland Grassland Grassland 
Urban, Rocks Urban or built-over area, Rock outcrop Other 
Land use categories 1997Land use categories 2008Land use group used in this paper
Dense forest, Forest mosaic, Forest open, Regrowth Closed evergreen forest, Mosaic of closed and open evergreen forest, Mosaic of semi-evergreen forest blocks, Open/disturbed evergreen forest, Secondary forest, semi-evergreen forest, semi-evergreen forest, open/disturbed cover Forest land 
Agriculture land, Mosaic of cropping, Rice paddy Mosaic of shifting cultivation/cropping and other vegetation cover < 30%, Mosaic of shifting cultivation/cropping and other vegetation cover > 30%, Permanent paddy field, Upland and perennial crop Agricultural land 
Wood and shrubland Evergreen wood and shrubland Wood and shrubland 
Grassland Grassland Grassland 
Urban, Rocks Urban or built-over area, Rock outcrop Other 
Figure 3

Process of future land use prediction in Nam Xong watershed.

Figure 3

Process of future land use prediction in Nam Xong watershed.

Close modal

Water use prediction

In the study area, water is used mainly for domestic purposes and irrigation. Data on the amount of water used for these purposes were input into the SWAT model. Domestic water use in each sub-watershed was calculated based on population size and rate of water use. In addition, the irrigation water requirement was calculated by CROPWAT 8.0 (software of the Food and Agriculture Organization, FAO), using climate, rainfall, soil type and crop schedule data from the study area.

Hydrological model

The SWAT model predicts the impact of land management practices on water, sediment, and agricultural chemical yields in watersheds with varying soils (Neitsch et al. 2011). Climate, land use and water use data measured under various conditions were put into SWAT. Using topographical data taken from a 30 m resolution digital elevation model (DEM), information on sub-watershed boundaries and the stream network was delineated (Zhang et al. 2002; Phomcha et al. 2011). For the purposes of this study, the Nam Xong watershed was divided into homogenous sub-watersheds. The final outlet of the watershed is at Hinhurb station near the mouth of the Nam Xong River, at the junction with the Nam Lik River. Land use and soil type layers in GIS format were used to generate hydrological response units (HRUs) for each sub-watershed. Data inputs were generated from weather stations and gauges in each sub-watershed. Weather data included measurements of rainfall, temperature, solar radiation, relative humidity, and wind speed. However, the limitations of this data meant only precipitation measurements were used. Other data were generated using the SWAT database 2009, modified by MRCS (Hoanh et al. 2010). Some parameters were adjusted at the calibration stage to ensure suitable and best results; the Nash–Sutcliffe model efficiency coefficient (E) and percentage of volume error (VE) were used to assess the accuracy of fit of the simulated result (Cibin et al. 2010; Margaret & Chaubey 2010; Sun et al. 2010). According to the limitations of the SWAT model, there was no diversion node. Therefore, during the calibration stage it was assumed that no water was diverted out of the basin and the observed value used for calibration at the final outlet was a combination of observed values from the Nam Xong diversion and Hinhurb station in 2000–2008. After the calibration stage, water diversion calculations were performed manually for relevant individual outlets.

Climate change in Nam Xong watershed

Figure 4 shows comparisons of baseline data (1990–2009) and future climate predictions (2011–2030). The average monthly rainfall of Kasy station in SRES family A2 will increase every month except for May. For SRES family B2, rainfall will increase from June to February and then decrease from March to May. The pattern also shows the shift of peak flow from July to August. In the case of Vangvieng station, rainfall will mostly decrease. It will decrease from February to September and increase from October to January.
Figure 4

Comparison of average annual rainfall between historical (1990–2009) and predicted (2011–2030).

Figure 4

Comparison of average annual rainfall between historical (1990–2009) and predicted (2011–2030).

Close modal

When comparing annual rainfall for the 1990–2009 and 2011–2030 periods, rainfall will increase at the Kasy and Hinhurb stations. However, at Vanvieng station it will decrease by about 17% and 13% for A2 and B2, respectively. With regard to the Nam Xong watershed, A2 and B2 climate scenarios showed that rainfall will increase by 21% and 27%, respectively, in the upper part, and by 68% and 79%, respectively, in the lower part. However, it will decrease by 17% and 13%, respectively (A2 and B2 scenarios), in the middle part of the watershed.

Mean temperature data revealed the hottest months were April to June. Figure 5, which compares average temperature, shows variable temperature changes in each month. The temperature of SRES A2 and B2 will decrease during November to March, and increase in April, June, July, September and October. Average temperature will increase by 0.42 °C in the wet season and decrease by 0.17 °C in the dry season (A2 scenario). Under the B2 scenario, temperature will increase in the wet and dry seasons by 0.47 °C and 0.04 °C, respectively. Overall, the temperature will increase by 0.12 °C (A2) and 0.26 °C (B2).
Figure 5

(a) Temperature data of Vangvieng station and (b) temperature comparison in Vangvieng station.

Figure 5

(a) Temperature data of Vangvieng station and (b) temperature comparison in Vangvieng station.

Close modal

Future land use and water use predictions in the Nam Xong watershed

Table 4 shows that from 1997 to 2008 woodland and shrub land was reduced by 170 km2, while forest and agricultural areas increased by 38 km2 and 127 km2, respectively. The quality of forest was not considered in this study. The long-term rate at which land use changes is an important variable for land use prediction. Changes to land use are highly dependent on the local economy and policies which were not considered in this study. Forest land, which occurs only along the boundary of forested areas, did not increase greatly. No woodland or shrub land was converted to forest between 1997 and 2008. The major change in terms of land use in the Nam Xong watershed was that woodland and shrub land were converted to agricultural land, with agricultural land also converted to woodland and shrub land. This was because of the creation of temporary agricultural areas through slash and burn practices. Agricultural land, therefore, can be divided into two types: permanent paddy fields along with other agricultural lands, and temporary crop fields. In the study area, woodland and shrub land will be replaced by agricultural land at a rate of 4.7% or 8,428 ha per 11 years (a fixed area of 8,428 ha for land use in 2019 and 16,856 ha for land use in 2030). All other types of land use change were not considered due to the small areas involved. This may have caused data digitization errors. However, it did not greatly affect stream flow analysis in the study area.

Table 4

Land use change in Nam Xong watershed during 1997–2008

 Land use 1997 (ha)
  
Land use typeForestAgriW&SGrassOtherTotal (ha)Change (ha)
Land use 2008 (ha) 
 Forest 64,900
(97.5%) 
1,198
(1.8%) 
444
(0.7%) 
1
(0.0%) 
1
(0.0%) 
66,544 1,315
(0.7%) 
 Agri 42
(0.1%) 
12,443
(44.0%) 
15,747
(55.7%) 
0
(0%) 
15
(0.0%) 
28,247 8,429
(4.7%) 
 W&S 285
(0.3%) 
5,878
(7.2%) 
75,030
(92.4%) 
15
(0.0%) 
10
(0.0%) 
81,218 −10,036
(−5.6%) 
 Grass 2
(0.1%) 
0
(0%) 
15
(0.9%) 
1,708
(99%) 
0
(0%) 
1,725 1
(0.0%) 
 Other 1
(0.0%) 
300
(12.2%) 
17
(0.7%) 
0
(0%) 
2,135
(87.0%) 
2,453 292
(0.2%) 
 Total (ha) 65,230 19,819 91,254 1,724 2,161 180,188 
 Land use 1997 (ha)
  
Land use typeForestAgriW&SGrassOtherTotal (ha)Change (ha)
Land use 2008 (ha) 
 Forest 64,900
(97.5%) 
1,198
(1.8%) 
444
(0.7%) 
1
(0.0%) 
1
(0.0%) 
66,544 1,315
(0.7%) 
 Agri 42
(0.1%) 
12,443
(44.0%) 
15,747
(55.7%) 
0
(0%) 
15
(0.0%) 
28,247 8,429
(4.7%) 
 W&S 285
(0.3%) 
5,878
(7.2%) 
75,030
(92.4%) 
15
(0.0%) 
10
(0.0%) 
81,218 −10,036
(−5.6%) 
 Grass 2
(0.1%) 
0
(0%) 
15
(0.9%) 
1,708
(99%) 
0
(0%) 
1,725 1
(0.0%) 
 Other 1
(0.0%) 
300
(12.2%) 
17
(0.7%) 
0
(0%) 
2,135
(87.0%) 
2,453 292
(0.2%) 
 Total (ha) 65,230 19,819 91,254 1,724 2,161 180,188 

Forest: forest land, Agri: agricultural land, W&S: wood and shrub land, Grass: grassland and Other: other type.

The correlation analysis for the wood-to-agriculture land use change showed that the regression model with the most explanatory power included certain variables only: distance to major roads, population density, and agriculture density. Slope and elevation were also in correlation, but as these values were too small these variables were ignored. In this study, the ROC curve showed that an agricultural density of 15 km was most suitable. In the equation, agricultural density and population density had a positive correlation, while distance to major roads had a negative correlation with the probability of change in woodland and shrub land. The equation of multi-logistic regression is:
formula
1
where P(LUC) = probability of land use change (dimensionless); (den15) = agricultural density within 15 km radius (dimensionless); (pop_den) = population density (dimensionless); and (road) = distance to major roads (dimensionless).
From Equation (1), the relative probability of land use change was calculated using the equation [exp(P(LUC))/(1 + exp(P(LUC))]. Thereafter, the highest-ranking cells for the pre-fixed total number of cells subject to change were converted to agricultural land. The result showed that 60.6% of new agricultural areas will be in the middle part of the Nam Xong watershed (Figure 6).
Figure 6

Land use data and predicted land use in Nam Xong watershed.

Figure 6

Land use data and predicted land use in Nam Xong watershed.

Close modal

Water use analysis

Domestic water use rates are not constant. They depend on various factors, such as the type and density of the community, economic status and livelihood, sanitation, and access to water supplies (Water Supply Authority 2007). To classify the residential area within the study area, consideration was given to factors such as population density, main roads, facilities and economic conditions, the location of districts, and how the Lao National Statistics Center classes a village. In the study area, residential areas were classed as rural or urban. Average water use rates of 50 L per person per day (L/p/d) and 100 L/p/d (WHO values) were applied to rural and urban areas, respectively. The current population was set according to the 2008 figure. Population estimates for each sub-watershed of the Nam Xong watershed were based on the rate of population change estimated by the United Nations (2010): from 2009 to 2030 the annual rate of population change in Lao PDR will be between 1.5 and 1. The calculation shows that average daily domestic water use will increase from 2,780 to 3,490 m3 between 2008 and 2030.

In the study area, water is used mainly for rice paddy cultivation (Nesbitt 2005). During the wet season paddies are cultivated from early July to the end of November; in the dry season from early January to the end of May. In the middle of the Nam Xong watershed, paddies total 3,127 ha in the dry season and 664 ha in the wet season, while in the lower part of the watershed these figures are 75 ha and 35 ha, respectively (Mekong River Commission 2008). Irrigation is needed on 128 days in the dry season and 65 days in the wet season (Mekong River Commission 2008). The irrigation water requirement per unit area calculation was completed using CROPWAT 8.0. Overall losses from water conveyance, application and storage efficiencies were put at 35% of the total irrigation water requirement.

Future water requirements were estimated, taking into account the effects of climate change and that larger areas will require irrigation. According to the 2010–2015 irrigation plan for Vanvieng district, an additional irrigation area of 762 ha is planned for the middle part of Nam Xong watershed by 2015. As Figure 7 shows, irrigation water requirements are high in the initial stages of paddy cultivation; January for the dry season and July for the wet season. With regard to the A2 and B2 future climate scenarios, irrigation water requirements will increase by 58% and 55%, respectively.
Figure 7

Estimation of irrigation water requirement in Nam Xong watershed.

Figure 7

Estimation of irrigation water requirement in Nam Xong watershed.

Close modal

Performance of SWAT model to simulate stream flow

Analysis indicated that the distribution of land use, soil and slope characteristics within each HRU has the greatest impact on predicted stream flow. As the percentage of land use, slope range and soil threshold increases, actual evapotranspiration decreases due to the elimination of land use classes. Therefore, HRU characteristics are the key factors affecting stream flow. Two hundred and sixty HRUs were generated in this study under the threshold of land use, soil and slope class (0/15/0%).

The model was simulated under the soil-moisture method (surface run-off) and variable storage method (channel routing). The outputs of the SWAT model were generated daily from 1 January 1985 to 31 December 2009 (from 1985 to 1989 preliminary results were collected). Observations of daily stream flow from 2000 to 2008 (Figure 8) were compared with simulated results at two points. Table 5 shows the model simulation was satisfactory for the Nam Xong diversion point (E = 0.73 and VE = 3.00%), while fair results were obtained for Hinhurb station (E = 0.65 and VE = –17.09%). However, predicted flow in the dry season was lower than recorded data. When comparing stream flow with rainfall intensity across the entire area of the project site, it was found that the stream flow was too high, even in areas where there had been little rainfall in some years. This may be due to errors in the original data, or because the rainfall distribution method is not suitable for this watershed. However, the simulated result for the Nam Xong diversion was satisfactory and of acceptable accuracy. Therefore, stream flows at the Nam Xong diversion and at the Nam Xong River outlet were used as baseline conditions in order to analyze future stream flow changes.
Table 5

Comparison of stream flow between simulation and observation

Calibration pointPeriodR2EVRStatus
Nam Xong diversion 2000–2008 0.74 0.73 3.00 Satisfy 
2000–2004 0.82 –8.33 Satisfy 
2004–2008 0.67 12.68 Fair 
Hinhurb station 2000–2008 0.68 0.65 –17.09 Fair 
2000–2004 0.57 –37.66 Fair 
2004–2008 0.71 –0.53 Satisfy 
Calibration pointPeriodR2EVRStatus
Nam Xong diversion 2000–2008 0.74 0.73 3.00 Satisfy 
2000–2004 0.82 –8.33 Satisfy 
2004–2008 0.67 12.68 Fair 
Hinhurb station 2000–2008 0.68 0.65 –17.09 Fair 
2000–2004 0.57 –37.66 Fair 
2004–2008 0.71 –0.53 Satisfy 
Figure 8

Comparisons of hydrological model simulation and observation at two points: (a) at Nam Xong diversion and (b) at Hinhurb station.

Figure 8

Comparisons of hydrological model simulation and observation at two points: (a) at Nam Xong diversion and (b) at Hinhurb station.

Close modal

Scenario comparisons

SWAT model simulations for 1990–2009 show that average daily stream flow at the Nam Xong diversion was 1,206 m3/s, with seasonal daily stream flows of 179 m3/s for the wet season and 22 m3/s for the dry season. The annual water volume was 60,568 Mm3. The highest daily flow (267 m3/s) was in August and the lowest (2 m3/s) in March. The average daily stream flow at the mouth of the Nam Xong River was 1,521 m3/s, with a seasonal daily stream flow of 222 m3/s for the wet season and 32 m3/s for the dry season. The annual water volume was 76,423 million m3. The highest daily flow (330 m3/s) was in August and the lowest (4 m3/s) in March. If water diversion is 60%, it is estimated that the final annual stream flow at the river mouth of the Nam Xong watershed will be 29,232 Mm3, or 50 m3/s per day.

It was found that stream flow at the Nam Xong diversion will decrease due to climate change, while at Hinhurb station it will increase because of greater rainfall in future. With regard to the various climate scenarios, the highest effect on stream flow in the study area will be as a result of climate change in the A2 family (Sc1). Figure 9 shows scenario comparisons at the Nam Xong diversion. It was found that stream flow will decrease by 12.5% and 12.2%, respectively, under the A2 and B2 scenarios. When considering future land use with climate change as Sc3 and Sc4, stream flow will decrease by 11.9% for A2 and 11.7% for B2. However, stream flow will not change greatly when the whole watershed is considered, as shown in Figure 9(b). Overall, stream flow will decrease by 1.9% and 1.3%, respectively, under the A2 and B2 scenarios.
Figure 9

Scenario comparison (a) at the Nam Xong diversion and (b) at the Nam Xong River mouth.

Figure 9

Scenario comparison (a) at the Nam Xong diversion and (b) at the Nam Xong River mouth.

Close modal

Table 6 shows that future land use (Sc3) will increase stream flow by 0.5% at the point of the Nam Xong diversion, and by 0.5% at the mouth of the Nam Xong River. Flows will vary also by season, with higher flows in the wet season and lower flows in the dry season. Table 7 compares baseline conditions and land use change scenarios for the 1990–2009 period. The results in this table support Bosch & Hewlett (1982) and Parvateesam (1996) in showing that future land use changes (agricultural land incrementally replacing woodland and shrub land) will result in higher surface run-off in the middle part of the Nam Xong watershed, while soil water content and evapotranspiration decrease. In the lower part of the watershed, the amount of surface run-off did not change greatly.

Table 6

Comparisons of average monthly discharge between baseline and scenarios

 Monthly discharge at Nam Xong diversion (m3/s)
Monthly discharge at Nam Xong River mouth (m3/s)
 BLSc1Sc2Sc3Sc4Sc5BLSc1Sc2Sc3Sc4Sc5
January 7,191 10,252 10,987 7,345 10,471 11,243 11,779 15,940 16,712 12,007 16,221 17,036 
February 1,799 2,470 2,762 1,842 2,559 2,846 3,732 4,526 4,747 3,812 4,647 4,858 
March 1,595 1,754 1,856 1,586 1,755 1,850 2,618 2,350 2,538 2,617 2,361 2,547 
April 3,508 3,116 3,396 3,468 3,085 3,377 4,073 3,843 4,109 4,036 3,809 4,091 
May 18,721 17,143 15,504 19,099 17,360 15,747 22,884 22,980 20,816 23,219 23,180 21,053 
June 84,043 58,759 54,403 85,484 59,786 55,437 100,144 80,491 75,134 101,616 81,461 76,143 
July 147,093 102,025 110,954 147,798 102,401 111,586 177,757 141,337 154,714 178,664 141,844 155,492 
August 157,257 134,415 135,402 157,585 134,914 135,803 194,774 187,491 189,213 195,290 188,210 189,788 
September 137,215 124,114 125,215 136,884 124,287 125,296 172,827 174,899 177,810 172,738 175,274 178,110 
October 80,391 86,906 84,184 80,245 87,033 84,378 106,223 125,391 122,007 106,263 125,744 122,416 
November 42,520 49,571 47,896 42,825 50,060 48,355 58,492 73,057 70,342 58,936 73,726 70,962 
December 19,691 23,130 22,764 19,935 23,457 23,102 29,223 35,160 34,785 29,573 35,591 35,236 
 Monthly discharge at Nam Xong diversion (m3/s)
Monthly discharge at Nam Xong River mouth (m3/s)
 BLSc1Sc2Sc3Sc4Sc5BLSc1Sc2Sc3Sc4Sc5
January 7,191 10,252 10,987 7,345 10,471 11,243 11,779 15,940 16,712 12,007 16,221 17,036 
February 1,799 2,470 2,762 1,842 2,559 2,846 3,732 4,526 4,747 3,812 4,647 4,858 
March 1,595 1,754 1,856 1,586 1,755 1,850 2,618 2,350 2,538 2,617 2,361 2,547 
April 3,508 3,116 3,396 3,468 3,085 3,377 4,073 3,843 4,109 4,036 3,809 4,091 
May 18,721 17,143 15,504 19,099 17,360 15,747 22,884 22,980 20,816 23,219 23,180 21,053 
June 84,043 58,759 54,403 85,484 59,786 55,437 100,144 80,491 75,134 101,616 81,461 76,143 
July 147,093 102,025 110,954 147,798 102,401 111,586 177,757 141,337 154,714 178,664 141,844 155,492 
August 157,257 134,415 135,402 157,585 134,914 135,803 194,774 187,491 189,213 195,290 188,210 189,788 
September 137,215 124,114 125,215 136,884 124,287 125,296 172,827 174,899 177,810 172,738 175,274 178,110 
October 80,391 86,906 84,184 80,245 87,033 84,378 106,223 125,391 122,007 106,263 125,744 122,416 
November 42,520 49,571 47,896 42,825 50,060 48,355 58,492 73,057 70,342 58,936 73,726 70,962 
December 19,691 23,130 22,764 19,935 23,457 23,102 29,223 35,160 34,785 29,573 35,591 35,236 
Table 7

Effect of land use change on water system in the watershed component during the period 1990–2009

LocationConditionEvapotranspiration (mm)Soil water content (mm)Surface run-off (mm)
Nam Xong diversion BL 865 146,912 1,132 
Sc3 852 146,647 1,165 
Difference –13 –265 33 
Nam Xong River mouth BL 773 152,914 502 
Sc3 761 153,485 502 
Difference –12 571 
LocationConditionEvapotranspiration (mm)Soil water content (mm)Surface run-off (mm)
Nam Xong diversion BL 865 146,912 1,132 
Sc3 852 146,647 1,165 
Difference –13 –265 33 
Nam Xong River mouth BL 773 152,914 502 
Sc3 761 153,485 502 
Difference –12 571 

The integration of GIS, statistic regression analysis and regional climate and hydrological models is very complex, but useful for investigating local stream flows. Future scenarios revealed stream flows will be affected significantly by climate and land use changes. Using SEA START RC it was shown that rainfall will increase at Kasy and Hinhurb stations in the upper and lower parts of the Nam Xong watershed, and decrease in the middle part of the watershed (Vangvieng station). Stream flows in the Nam Xong watershed were most affected by climate change under the A2 scenario. Climate analysis results showed a decrease in rainfall at Vangvieng station in the future, a result opposite to that obtained for the other two stations. However, it might be that any decrease in rainfall from 2011 to 2030 will be caused by a 20-year period of climate variability, as occurred between 1969 and 1989. Future land use and water use were estimated in order to analyze stream flow changes in the study area. Agriculture density, population density, and distance to major roads were correlated with land use change. For the period 1997–2008, it was found that the major change in terms of land use involved the conversion of woodland and shrub land to agricultural land, mainly as a result of ‘slash and burn’. Strong local policies relating to forest protection and reforestation will limit this practice in future. Future land use scenarios showed that stream flow will increase only by 0.48% (wet season). Overall, future stream flow in the Nam Xong watershed will change little as a result of climate and land use changes. However, it was found that stream flow will decrease by over 10% in the Nam Xong diversion sub-watershed, and increase in the lower part of the Nam Xong watershed. Having more land under agriculture will not greatly affect stream flow. These results can help development planners, decision-makers and managers plan for the use of water resources in a suitable and sustainable manner. As previously discussed, hydrologic data collection is an essential part of planning for water resources development and management. However, many developing countries such as Lao PDR, which has been facing increasing water resources issues and natural disasters such as floods and droughts, lack hydrologic data due to a limited budget to install and maintain gauges. Therefore, in this study, a modeling approach was used as an alternative way to compensate for data limitations in order to predict future flow patterns under different scenarios. The results from this study can be useful for planners and policy-makers who need a better understanding of a watershed under both current and future conditions in order to establish a basin development plan including climate change adaptation.

This research was partially funded by the Thailand International Development Cooperation Agency (TICA). The authors would like to extend their appreciation to all data providers for sharing the information required for this study.

Calder
I. R.
2000
Land Use Impacts on Water Resources
.
Centre for Land Use and Water Resources Research, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
,
UK
.
Chingchanagool
C.
2011
Impact of future climate on trends of inflow to Ubolratana dam, Thailand
.
Master thesis
,
Asian Institute of Technology
,
Bangkok
,
Thailand
.
Cibin
R.
Sudheer
K. P.
Chaubey
I.
2010
Sensitivity and identifiability of stream flow generation parameters of the SWAT model
.
Hydrol. Process.
24
(
9
),
1133
1148
.
de Nijs
T.
2009
Modelling Land Use Change: Improving the Prediction of Future Land Use Pattern
.
Netherlands Geographical Studies
,
Utrecht
.
Eastham
J.
Mpelasoka
F.
Mainuddin
M.
Ticehurst
C.
Dyce
P.
Hodgson
G.
Ali
R.
Kirby
M.
2008
Mekong River Basin Water Resources Assessment: Impacts of Climate Change
.
CSIRO: Water for a Healthy Country National Research Flagship
,
CSIRO
,
Australia
.
Hoanh
C. T.
Jirayoot
K.
Lacombe
G.
Srinetr
V.
2010
Impacts of climate change and development on Mekong flow regime, First assessment – 2009, MRC Technical Paper No. 29
.
Mekong River Commission
,
Vientiane
,
Lao PDR
.
IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change)
2007
Contribution of working group I to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
. In:
Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis
(
Solomon
S.
Qin
D.
Manning
M.
Chen
Z.
Marquis
M.
Averyt
K. B.
Tignor
M.
Miller
H. L.
, eds).
Cambridge University Press
,
Cambridge
,
UK
.
Jha
M.
Pan
Z.
Takle
E. S.
Gu
R.
2004
Impacts of climate change on stream flow in the Upper Mississippi River Basin: a regional climate model perspective
.
J. Geophys. Res.
109
,
D09105
.
Kamusoko
C.
Oono
K.
Nakazawa
A.
Wada
Y.
Nakada
R.
Hosokawa
T.
Tomimura
S.
Furuya
T.
Iwata
A.
Moriike
H.
Someya
T.
Yamase
T.
Nasu
M.
Gomi
Y.
Sano
T.
Isobe
T.
Homsysavath
K.
2011
Spatial simulation modelling of future forest cover change scenarios in Luangprabang province, Lao PDR
.
Forests
2
,
707
729
.
Kawasaki
A.
Takamatsu
M.
He
J.
Rogers
P.
Herath
S.
2010
An integrated approach to evaluate potential impact of precipitation and land use change on stream flow in Srepok River Basin
.
Theory Appl. GIS
18
(
2
),
9
20
.
Lauri
H.
de Moel
H.
Ward
P. J.
Rasanen
T. A.
Keskinen
M.
Kummu
M.
2012
Future changes in Mekong River hydrology: impact of climate change and reservoir operation on discharge
.
Hydrol. Earth Syst. Sci.
16
,
4603
4619
.
Ly
K.
2010
Assessment of the effects of land use change on water quality and quantity in the Nam Xong watershed using the better assessment science integrating point and nonpoint sources 4.0 model
.
Master thesis
,
Lincoln University
,
New Zealand
.
Lyle
C.
Boualapha
C.
2011
Scenario-based development planning for Nam Xong watershed
. In:
Small Publication, Series. No. 34
.
Center for River Basin Organizations and Management
,
Central Java
.
Mekong River Commission
2008
Improvement of Irrigation Efficiency on Paddy Field in the Lower Mekong Basin (IIEPF): Field Observation and Data Analysis for Irrigation Efficiency for IIEPF, Final Report
.
Mekong River Commission
,
Vientiane
,
Lao PDR
.
Miaillier
L.
2007
River Basin Management in Lao PDR: Case Study of Nam Xong Watershed Vientiane Province
.
Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry
,
Vientiane
,
Lao PDR
.
Ministry of Forestry, Agriculture (MAF)
2005
Forestry Strategy to the year 2020 of Lao PDR
.
Prime Minister's Office
,
Vientiane
,
Lao PDR
.
Ministry of Forestry, Agriculture (MAF)
2007
Forest Law. No. 6/NA
.
National Assembly
,
Vientiane
,
Lao PDR
.
Mustard
J.
Fisher
T.
2004
Land use and hydrology
. In:
Land Change Science: Observing Monitoring and Understanding Trajectories of Change on the Earth's Surface
(
Futman
G.
Janetos
A.
Justice
C.
Moran
E.
Mustard
J.
Rindfuss
R.
Skole
D.
Turner
B. L.
Cochrane
M.
, eds).
Kluwer Academic Publishers
,
Dordrecht
, pp.
257
276
.
Nam Ngum River Basin Sector Development Project (NNRBSDP)
2008a
Nam Ngum River Basin Profile
.
Department of Water Resources
,
Vientiane
,
Lao PDR
.
Nam Ngum River Basin Sector Development Project (NNRBSDP)
2008b
National Water Resources Profile
.
Department of Water Resources
,
Vientiane
,
Lao PDR
.
Nam Ngum River Basin Sector Development Project (NNRBSDP)
2009
Nam Xong Sub-Basin Profile
.
Department of Water Resources
,
Vientiane
,
Lao PDR
.
Nesbitt
H. J.
2005
Water Used for Agriculture in the Lower Mekong Basin
.
MRC Discussion Paper
,
Mekong River Commission
,
Vientiane
,
Lao PDR
.
Nietsch
S. L.
Arnold
J. G.
Kiniry
J. R.
Williams
J. R.
2011
Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Theoretical documentation, version 2009
.
Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report No. 406, Texas A&M University System
,
Texas
,
USA
.
Parvateesam
K.
1996
Prediction of effects of land use change on river basin run-off: Application of Large Scale Catchment Model (LASCAM)
.
Master thesis
,
Asian Institute of Technology
,
Bangkok
,
Thailand
.
Phomcha
P.
Wirojanagud
P.
Vangpaisal
T.
Thaveevouthti
T.
2011
Suitability of SWAT model for simulating of monthly stream flow in Lam Sonthi Watershed
.
J. Indust. Technol.
7
(
2
),
49
56
.
SEA START RC
2006
Final technical report No.15: AIACC AS07 Southeast Asia Regional Vulnerability to Changing Water Resource and Extreme Hydrological Events due to Climate Change
,
Report of the Southeast Asia START Regional Center
.
Southeast Asia START Regional Center
,
Bangkok
.
Shahidul
Md. I.
Ahmed
R.
2011
Land use change prediction in Dhaka city using GIS aided Markov Chain modeling
.
J. Life Earth Sci.
6
,
81
89
.
Takahashi
S.
Liang
L.
2010
Implications of policy inventions for land use changes and local livelihoods in Lao PDR
.
Policy Matters
17
,
51
54
.
United Nations Department of Economic, Social Affairs/Population Division
2010
World Population Prospects: The 2010, Volume II: Demographic Profiles, Available from: esa.un.org/wpp/Documentation/pdf/WPP2010_Volume-II_Demographic-Profiles.pdf (accessed 25 May 2015)
.
Verburg
P. H.
de Nijs
T. C. M.
Ritsema van Eck
J.
Visser
H.
Jong
K. D.
2004
A method to analyse neighbourhood characteristics of land use patterns
.
Comput. Environ. Urban.
28
,
667
690
.
Verburg
P.
Steeg
J.
Schulp
N.
2005
Manual for the CLUE-Kenya Application
.
Wageningen University
,
The Netherlands
.
Water Supply Authority
2007
Technical Guideline of Water Supply Management in Lao PDR-Volume B
.
Water Supply Authority
,
Vientiane
,
Lao PDR
.
Zawawi
M. A. M.
Mustapha
S.
Puasa
Z.
2010
Determination of water requirement in paddy field at Seberang Perak rice cultivation area
.
J. I. Eng.
71
(
4
),
32
41
.
Zhang
L.
Walker
G. R.
Dawes
W. R.
2002
Water balance modelling: concepts and applications
. In:
Regional Water and Soil Assessment for Managing Sustainable Agriculture In China and Australia
(
McVicar
T. R.
Rui
L.
Walker
J.
Fitzpatrick
R. W.
Changming
L.
, eds).
ACIAR Monograph
84
, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, Canberra, Australia, pp.
31
47
.