Understanding glaciers and glacial lake behaviors is crucial for assessing natural disasters; however, quantifying these changes remains challenging due to inaccessibility. Glacier melt and landslides can expand lakes, leading to catastrophic flooding. Accurate flood surge estimations and impact assessments depend on continuous monitoring and detailed analysis of terrain changes, typically using digital elevation models (DEMs) derived before and after glacial lake outburst flood (GLOF) events. Traditional empirical methods lack precision, especially in remote areas. During the recent GLOF at the South Lhonak Lake in India, triggered by landslide debris and water surge, significant downstream damage emphasized the need for precise analysis. This study developed an innovative photogrammetric methodology to create DEMs for pre- and post-GLOF events, offering a detailed understanding of terrain changes. Unlike conventional methods using stereo images from a same sensor, this approach utilized a novel single-image photogrammetry technique with stereo images from multiple satellite sensors. This method estimated that 11.50 million cubic meters (MCM) of debris entered the lake, reducing water volume by 43.21 MCM, with a total surge of 54.71 MCM. The study demonstrates the effectiveness of advanced photogrammetry in achieving accurate volumetric estimates, setting a new standard for assessing and mitigating GLOF impacts.

  • This study involves a remote sensing and photogrammetric method for computing the volume of water.

  • This method made use of single-image photogrammetric method for deriving terrain in the absence of stereo pairs for small areas.

Glaciers in the Himalayan region are considered the freshwater towers of South and East Asia and are strongly affected by climate change (Vohra 2007). In recent decades, most of the world's mountain glaciers have experienced adverse mass balance and terminal recessions (Haeberli et al. 1999). Swift declines have been observed across the Greater Himalayas, causing the formation of new lakes (Ageta et al. 2001). Lakes at the glacier's terminus are primarily confined by lateral or end moraines, posing a heightened risk of breaching. Due to their potential for holding significant water volumes, these lakes can be hazardous. Breaching and the sudden release of water from these lakes can generate flash floods, leading to substantial damage in downstream areas and loss of lives and infrastructure (Allen et al. 2016; Aggarwal et al. 2017). The 2013 Kedarnath disaster (central Himalaya), which was a glacier lake outburst flood (GLOF) from the Chorabari Lake associated with flash-flooding and landslides triggered by intense precipitation in the region, led to over 6,000 fatalities and washed away a major part of a settlement located just over 1 km downstream of the lake (Allen et al. 2019). The risk that a potentially dangerous lake may present in low-lying areas can only be recognized if a detailed hazard assessment is undertaken (Nie et al. 2018). The probability of a GLOF event is, however, difficult to estimate (Wang et al. 2015; Maskey et al. 2020) due to rapid changes in the glacial systems, the low frequency of such events, and the high complexity of the involved processes. Therefore, evaluating the characteristics of a glacial lake, its surroundings, and local hydrodynamical flood modeling allow us to understand how a valley will behave in case of a potential GLOF event (Khanal et al. 2015; Wang et al. 2015). Glacier lakes are inaccessible for evaluating the cause and quantification of geomorphologic changes, emphasizing the importance of advanced remote sensing techniques for hazard quantification (Budhathoki et al. 2010). The surface area of a lake can be determined using remotely sensed data. However, when estimating the potential peak discharge due to a possible outburst, it is essential to know the volume of the glacier lake rather than just its area (Benny & Dawson 1983).

The reliability of these remote sensing-based bathymetric studies depends on finding a significant correlation between water depth and reflected energy (Baban 1993). Collecting glacier lake bathymetry data in the Himalayas is challenging, time-consuming, and costly, with no studies using remote sensing for this purpose. Cao et al. (2019) and Anees et al. (2022) reviewed the various photogrammetric methods for obtaining bathymetry of lakes that are inaccessible and shallow in depth. The widespread availability of affordable remote sensing platforms with high spatial and temporal resolution facilitates swift, semi-automated, and cost-effective evaluations of glacier parameter changes over large areas (Racoviteanu et al. 2008). Halder & Bose (2024) have demonstrated the integration of Google Earth Engine (GEE) with Sentinel-1 SAR data and Landsat 9 imagery for a comprehensive, near-real-time flood mapping and analysis of GLOFs.

This remote sensing methodology involves extracting topographic information from satellite images (Kumar & Bhardwaj 2021) and volume from the satellite stereo pairs, which enables the generation of precise digital elevation models (DEMs) (Janet et al. 2006; Tsutsui 2007; Giribabu et al. 2013). However, pre- and post-stereo pairs are to be available to estimate the volume of water or debris displaced in the event, which is only sometimes possible. Willneff et al. (2005) demonstrated the possibility of deriving the depth from single-image photogrammetry using precise refined rational polynomial coefficients (RPCs), image coordinates, and iterative image coordinates tracing methods. Claudio Bozzini (2014) and Bhushan et al. (2021) studied the accuracy of the DEMs extracted using stereo-matching techniques from the stereo images. Also, Atefi & Miura (2021) and Robson et al. (2022) have demonstrated the computation of volumes of landslides using satellite stereo data of before and after events. Hence, geomorphology changes and land patterns can be assessed by comparing these DEMs. In Sikkim, glaciers terminating in lakes have increased growth compared to those without lakes (Marti et al. 2016; Aggarwal et al. 2017). Therefore, evaluating the characteristics of the South Lhonak Lake, nestled in the Himalayan region, has faced environmental challenges, with glacial and landslide dynamics being key contributors to its vulnerability. Sharma et al. (2018) and Sattara et al. (2021) presented the susceptibility of damage due to GLOF and future growth of the South Lhonak Lake using satellite data, DEM, and other ancillary data.

This study utilizes advanced photogrammetric techniques and high-resolution satellite imagery to analyze the landslide debris and depletion of water storage in the South Lhonak Lake, Sikkim, India. A combination of both stereo and mono imaging is done, covering the image collection dates during pre- and post-GLOF events. In addition, the SAR images from the RISAT-1A satellite are also used to interpret the glacier lake area after the GLOF. The specific importance of this study is that it offers a comprehensive analysis of changes in the glacier lake, which is crucial for understanding the catastrophic event that occurred on 3 October 2023. The methodology involves data satellite acquisition, photogrammetric image processing, generation of pre- and post-DEMs, change detection, and estimation of the volume of the landslide debris and amount of water depletion from the lake due to GLOF.

The South Lhonak Lake is located at about 5,200 m above sea level in the southeast of the Indian state of Sikkim. The study area encompasses the South Lhonak glacial lake, situated at coordinates 27.913° N and 88.199° E, along with the downstream drainage area of the Chungthang Dam site (which is the confluence of the Lachen and Lachung rivers). The lake mainly receives melt water from the South Lhonak Glacier and is supplemented by the outflow from the North of Lhonak glacial lake. The glacier has a total area of 12.5 km2, as mapped in 2019. In line with the glacier retreat, the lake has been exhibiting significant growth over the years as it grew from 0.42 km2 in 1990 to 1.35 km2 in 2019 (Sattara et al. 2021). According to measurements of the lake's depth, the lake's volume is 65.8 × 106 m3, with the deepest part measuring 131 m (Sharma et al. 2018).

The lake terminal moraine marks the downstream boundary of the lake, which is composed of loosely consolidated glacial deposits. On the other hand, the lateral moraines of the lake's sides are made up of loose material. The outflow drainage channel of the lake has a slope of 30 H:1 V, which is relatively steep and favorable for high flood wave velocities. The effects of heavy precipitation in the surroundings can cause flash floods in areas downstream. The lake's outlet is narrow and drains into the Goma channel, which then flows into the Zemu River, located 36 km downstream from the lake. The area around the lake is moderately populated, and downstream of the lake are numerous settlements and critical infrastructure, such as dams and barrages, with one significant town being Chungthang, located 62 km downstream (Sharma et al. 2018). The location of the study area is shown in Figure 1.
Figure 1

Location map showing the study area.

Figure 1

Location map showing the study area.

Close modal

High-resolution stereo satellite images were used to analyze the terrain dynamics surrounding the South Lhonak Lake before and after a GLOF event. Data used for analysis are tabulated in Table 1.

Table 1

List of satellite data used for the study

S. no.Satellite datasetDate of passResolutionRoll for stereo formationPitch for stereo formation
CartoSat-1 before 9 October 2015 2.5 m – +26° 
CartoSat-1 after 9 October 2015 2.5 m – −5° 
CartoSat-3 13 May 2023 60 cm +0.85° +0.5° 
CartoSat-2S 11 November 2023 60 cm 26.136 0.5 
CartoSat-2S 12 November 2023 60 cm −17.40 0.410 
Risat-1A image (MRS) 4 October 2023 18 m – – 
S. no.Satellite datasetDate of passResolutionRoll for stereo formationPitch for stereo formation
CartoSat-1 before 9 October 2015 2.5 m – +26° 
CartoSat-1 after 9 October 2015 2.5 m – −5° 
CartoSat-3 13 May 2023 60 cm +0.85° +0.5° 
CartoSat-2S 11 November 2023 60 cm 26.136 0.5 
CartoSat-2S 12 November 2023 60 cm −17.40 0.410 
Risat-1A image (MRS) 4 October 2023 18 m – – 
Table 2

Data selection and remarks

DataSelection and remarks
1. Pre-GLOF event data CartoSat-3 (13 May 2023) 
  • Resolution: 60 cm

  • Quality: High resolution for detailed terrain information and accurate DEM generation.

 
CartoSat-1 (9 October 2015) 
  • Resolution: 2.5 m (Before and after)

  • Quality: Suitable for capturing large-scale terrain features despite lower resolution.

 
CartoSat-2S (11 November 2023) 
  • Resolution: Around 1 m

  • Quality: Balanced coverage and detail, useful for updating the DEM before the GLOF event.

 
CartoSat-3 (13 May 2023) Single-image photogrammetry
  • Resolution: 60 cm

  • Quality: Accuracy of DEM depends on the refinement of RPCs, image resolution, and the number of iterations.

 
2. Post-GLOF event data CartoSat-2S (11 and 12 November 2023) 
  • Resolution: Similar to pre-GLOF CartoSat-2S data.

  • Quality: Consistent resolution for comparing pre- and post-GLOF terrain changes.

 
3. Additional data RISAT-1A SAR Purpose: Used for analyzing changes in glacial lake extent and boundary, providing additional surface composition 
DataSelection and remarks
1. Pre-GLOF event data CartoSat-3 (13 May 2023) 
  • Resolution: 60 cm

  • Quality: High resolution for detailed terrain information and accurate DEM generation.

 
CartoSat-1 (9 October 2015) 
  • Resolution: 2.5 m (Before and after)

  • Quality: Suitable for capturing large-scale terrain features despite lower resolution.

 
CartoSat-2S (11 November 2023) 
  • Resolution: Around 1 m

  • Quality: Balanced coverage and detail, useful for updating the DEM before the GLOF event.

 
CartoSat-3 (13 May 2023) Single-image photogrammetry
  • Resolution: 60 cm

  • Quality: Accuracy of DEM depends on the refinement of RPCs, image resolution, and the number of iterations.

 
2. Post-GLOF event data CartoSat-2S (11 and 12 November 2023) 
  • Resolution: Similar to pre-GLOF CartoSat-2S data.

  • Quality: Consistent resolution for comparing pre- and post-GLOF terrain changes.

 
3. Additional data RISAT-1A SAR Purpose: Used for analyzing changes in glacial lake extent and boundary, providing additional surface composition 

Selection and quality of satellite data for pre- and post-GLOF DEMs

Data selection and remarks of the satellite data used are listed in the Table 2.

Potential impacts on results due to data limitations

Resolution variability: Different resolutions (60 cm–2.5 m) can lead to inconsistencies in DEM accuracy and terrain analysis, with lower-resolution data potentially missing finer details.

Sensor differences: Variations in sensor capabilities across different satellites can affect data quality, base-to-height ratios for stereo fusion and compatibility, requiring consistent processing to minimize discrepancies.

The selection of high-resolution satellite data from CartoSat-3 and CartoSat-2S ensures detailed and accurate analysis of terrain changes around the South Lhonak Lake. However, resolution variability, temporal gaps, and sensor differences pose challenges that need careful management to ensure reliable results. Consistent processing and careful data integration are essential for the reliability of the findings.

A DEM is a representation of the topography or terrain of a surface in digital format. It is typically a raster grid where each cell contains an elevation value representing the height of the surface at that location. DEMs are generated using multiple methods such as Satellite Stereo Imagery, Satellite Radar Interferometry (InSAR), airborne stereo photogrammetry, or Lidar (Light Detection and Ranging) methods. However, the present study uses satellite stereo imagery as there was an opportunity to capture pre- and post-event scenario of the South Lhonak Lake from the archived satellite data and current sceanrio through specific planning for satellite data acqusition (Evans et al. 2008).

A systematic approach is essential to assess the impacts of a GLOF event. This methodology integrates satellite data acquisition, photogrammetric processing, DEM generation, and comparative analysis of pre- and post-GLOF DEM interms of volumetry and profiles as shown in the flow chart of Figure 2(a). The details of the step-by-step proecdure are explained in the following sections.
Figure 2

Satellite images used in the study. (a) Block diagram showing the workflow of methodology for volumetric analysis.

Figure 2

Satellite images used in the study. (a) Block diagram showing the workflow of methodology for volumetric analysis.

Close modal

Photogrammetric processing of pre- and post-data used

Photogrammetry is a sophisticated technique used to derive three-dimensional (3D) information from two-dimensional (2D) images. This method involves capturing multiple images of an object or terrain from different angles and processing them to generate an accurate 3D model. Detailed breakdown of the process is explained in the following steps.

Image acquisition

This initial step involves acquiring images of the target area or object. For the study area, satellite images were acquired from different satellites (CartoSat-1 on 9 October 2015; CartoSat-3 on 13 May 2023; and CartoSat-2S on 11 and 12 November 2023).

Triangulation and block adjustment

It is the process of re-establishing the precise relationship between all images and real-world coordinates as they were at the time of image acquisition. This is done by refining rational polynomial equations coefficiets, which map the relationship between the image plane, the ground plane, and the camera by principle of triangulation and it is achieved by following steps.

Image orientation: This involves aligning the images with each other by measuring tie points across overlapping images and RPCs. In this process, over 350 semi-automatic tie points were used to refine the RPCs across all the images. The tie points and root mean square error (RMSE) accuracy, which measure the alignment accuracy, resulted in a value of 0.537 pixels. This accuracy complies with the requirement of being less than one pixel, which is the target after triangulation and adjustment.

Geo-referencing: Involves assigning real-world coordinates to the reconstructed block. In this study, seven ground control points (GCPs) were collected and measured from reference images and the Copernicus DEM with a 30-m resolution to refine the RPCs, ensuring the 3D model accurately corresponds to the real-world location. The RMSE measures the difference between predicted and observed values. For the control points (Alganci et al. 2018), in this study, the value is 0.8 in the x direction (RMSE-X), 0.72 in the y direction (RMSE-Y), and 1.2 in the z direction (RMSE-Z). These values indicate the accuracy of the control points after adjustments for sub-pixel accuracy. Also, the next step involves creating a detailed and accurate 3D stereo model from the 2D images, as explained in Section 4.2. Figure 3(a)–3(c) illustrates the photogrammetric methodology, the configuration of photogrammetric block adjustment, and tie point measurement. However, photogrammetry in this study has the following few limitations in acquiring DEMs.
Figure 3

(a) Flowchart showing the photogrammetry methodology, (b) configuration of photogrammetric block adjustment, (c) tie point measurement, and (d) selection of stereo pairs and generation pre- and post-GLOF DEMs.

Figure 3

(a) Flowchart showing the photogrammetry methodology, (b) configuration of photogrammetric block adjustment, (c) tie point measurement, and (d) selection of stereo pairs and generation pre- and post-GLOF DEMs.

Close modal

Resolution variability: The study utilizes satellite data with varying resolutions ranging from 60 cm to 2.5 m. This variability in resolution leads to inconsistencies in the DEMs generated from these images, as higher-resolution images can capture finer details compared to lower-resolution ones. These differences can affect the accuracy of terrain change detection, as smaller features might be visible in high-resolution images but missed in lower-resolution ones, potentially leading to inaccurate analyses of changes over time.

Temporal gaps in data acquisition: Significant temporal gaps between data acquisition dates, spanning from 2015 to 2023, present a challenge in capturing continuous changes in the terrain. These gaps can result in missed intermediate changes, which are crucial for accurate analysis. Additionally, the loss of stereo-image pairs necessary for generating accurate DEMs is a concern. In such cases, the study resorts to single-image photogrammetry, an iterative process for deriving DEMs from single images. However, this method is less accurate than using stereo pairs.

Geometric and radiometric corrections: Geometric corrections ensure that satellite images accurately represent the spatial relationships of terrain features, while radiometric corrections normalize the brightness and contrast of images. Differences in these corrections applied to images from various satellites can introduce errors and inconsistencies in the DEMs. Ensuring uniform geometric and radiometric corrections across all images is crucial to minimize discrepancies and maintain accuracy in the data processing.

Multiple sensor data: The lack of availability of a single stereo pair for the period just before the GLOF event necessitated forming stereo pairs from multiple dates and sensors. Data from different sensors acquired at various altitudes and angles lead to variations in base-to-height (B/H) ratios, which can cause inconsistencies in the accuracy of the DEMs. To address these issues, the study considers the lowest accuracy for both pre- and post-GLOF DEMs, acknowledging that the inherent differences in sensor data quality impact the reliability of terrain change detection.

Generation of DEM

Once the photogrammetric processing is complete, stereo pairs are prepared from oriented overlapping images. Corresponding matching points are then measured semi-automatically. A point cloud (elevation points) is generated by measuring these corresponding matching points in the overlapping stereo pairs, representing the 3D coordinates of points on the surface as shown in Figure 3(d). This step is essential for creating a detailed 3D model of the terrain. Using the point cloud data, the surface of the terrain is reconstructed in the form of a DEM at a 5-m spatial interval for both pre- and post-GLOF events, as explained in the following sections.

DEM generation from the images acquired during a pre-flood event

Creating a pre-event terrain surface, typically requires single high-resolution stereo imagery close to the event date of 4 October 2023. However, since there were no stereo images available from this time period in the archives, an alternative approach was needed. This approach combined multi-sensor stereo pairs from different dates and single-image photogrammetry for generation of pre-DEM as Part A, Part B, and Part C as shown in Figure 4(d). The only image available near the event date was a single CartoSat-3 image taken on 13 May 2023 as shown in Figure 4(b). Additionally, CartoSat-1 stereo data from 9 October 2018, as shown in Figure 4(a), which included before and after data, were available but nearly 5.5 years old. Post-event data from 11 October 2023 were also available which are close to the date of event. In light of these circumstances, assumptions about the topography were necessary for deriving pre-DEM, assuming the terrain of the South Lhonak Lake remained mostly unchanged between 13 May and 3 October 2023, the day before the event (GLOF). By using all available images to create stereo pairs, a DEM was generated representing the pre-event terrain. If there were significant changes in the terrain between the dates of image acquisition, stereo imaging would not work. When a stereo pair is formed using CartoSat-3 and CartoSat-1 images, it shows that there were no major terrain changes during that period in some areas. The resulting DEM reflects the pre-event terrain. Similarly, if a stereo pair is created using a CartoSat-2 image from 11 October 2023, as shown in Figure 4(c) along with the CartoSat-3 image from 13 May 2023, it shows minimal changes in some other areas, except for the main area of interest, between pre- and post-event terrains. Therefore, the DEM in this case also represents the pre-event terrain. When CartoSat-3 cannot form a stereo pair with other available images, the single-image photogrammetry must be used. In this method, elevation (z) can be calculated through the iterative photogrammetric (IP) method, which uses inverse RPC equations. This common approach in photogrammetry solves the back projection problem by iteratively comparing calculated image points with observed image points, starting with an approximate DEM (Sheng 2005). The CartoSat-3 image from 13 May 2023, can be utilized to derive a DEM for the region where stereo is not formed for pre-DEM. The area of interest is divided into three Parts ‘A’, ‘B’, and ‘C'as shown in Figure 4(d). This division is based on the posibility of formation of stereo vision from different images within the area of interest for pre-event DEM. The DEM was generated from both stereo pairs and single-image photogrammetry.
Figure 4

(a–c) Combination of images for stereo pair for pre-DEM, (d) demarcation of spatial parts for generation of pre-DEM into Part A, Part B, and Part C, (e and f) mono-plotting of points on 13 May 2023 and its zoomed view, (g and h) iterative process of single-image photogrammetric process for Part ‘C’ DEM and error analysis, (i and j) pre-GLOF DEM and post-GLOF DEM.

Figure 4

(a–c) Combination of images for stereo pair for pre-DEM, (d) demarcation of spatial parts for generation of pre-DEM into Part A, Part B, and Part C, (e and f) mono-plotting of points on 13 May 2023 and its zoomed view, (g and h) iterative process of single-image photogrammetric process for Part ‘C’ DEM and error analysis, (i and j) pre-GLOF DEM and post-GLOF DEM.

Close modal

Part A DEM: A DEM of this region was created using a stereo pair of CartoSat-3 images from 13 May, along with CartoSat-1 data at a resolution of 2.5 m in the area known as Part A. This combination of data suggests that the terrain remained relatively unchanged between the dates of acquisition, providing consistent elevation data.

While the stereo pair yielded highly accurate elevation information for 13 May in Part A, there may be slight variations in terrain in other sections (B and C) where stereo imagery was not feasible, making this pair unsuitable for generating DEMs in Parts B and C.

To produce a precise DEM for Part A, mass points and break lines were manually extracted, and accuracy was meticulously verified using stereoscopic methods. Regarding DEM accuracy, the stereo pair had a convergence angle of approximately 27°, with a B/H of 0.52 and a stereo fusion accuracy of 2 m (as both images were re-sampled to 2 m). Consequently, the vertical accuracy of the DEM was determined to be 3.8 m.

Part B DEM: The stereo pair of images to create a DEM in this area is acquired on two dates. The first image was obtained on 13 May 2023, using CartoSat-3, while the second image was taken on 11 October 2023, with CartoSat-2S. Despite the excellent stereo configuration, we encountered difficulties working with the lake outlet and landslide zone. DEM in this area is generated by manually adding mass points and break lines with vertical accuracy of 2.0 m, having a B/H ratio of 0.3, and a stereo fusion of 60 cm.

Part C DEM: On 13 May 2023, CartoSat-3 was unable to form a stereo image with available datasets in Part C due to terrain changes that occurred before and after that date. To generate a DEM in this area, as shown in Figure 4(e) and 4(f), over 200 image points were extracted by mono-plotting from a single-image taken on 13 May 2022. These points were used to calculate ground coordinates using refined RPCs and precise image coordinates through single-image photogrammetry as shown in Figure 4(g) as discussed in studies by Willneff et al. (2005) and Welponer et al. (2022). The ground coordinates (X, Y, and Z) for each point was calculated by initially assuming cube of a 9 m × 9 m (horizontal) and 100 m (vertical) above the post-DEM using the iterative inverse photogrammetric method of RPC equations with refined coefficients derived from combined photogrammetric adjustment of pre- and post-satellite data. The process continued until image plane accuracy reached a minimum of three pixels, so from the error frequency and image coordinate pixel graph shows more than 176 out of 200 points are up to pixels shown in Figure 4(h) and a vertical accuracy of 3.8 m was achieved. This resulted in DEM points with 3.8 m accuracy in Part C as shown in Figure 4(i). The observed residuals were obtained using an iteration interval of 1 m horizontally and 1 m vertically. The rational polynomial equation coefficients for mapping between ground and image are shown in the following.
where x and y are image coordinates and X, Y, and Z are ground coordinates; RPCs = a(), b(), c(), d().

DEM generation from the images acquired post-GLOF event

Stereo images were acquired from CartoSat-2S on 11 and 12 November 2023, from CartoSat-2S, with a converging angle of 43.54°. These images were utilized in LPS Leica photogrammetric Software (LPS) and manual mass points and break lines were drawn on stereo pair to create elevation terrain data (Krishna et al. 2008; Kugler & Wendt 2021; Kumar & Bhardwaj 2021; Siva Subramanian et al. 2023; Barbarella et al. 2017). The resulting DEM, with a 5-m spacing, effectively depicts the height information of the South Lhonak Lake area and its surroundings following the lake breach, as illustrated in the accompanying image (Figure 4(j)).

Accuracy analysis of pre- and post-photogrammetric DEMs and volumes

To assess the accuracy of the pre- and post-event DEMs for the GLOF scenario, a detailed evaluation was conducted using manual stereoscopic analysis on satellite stereo models (Table 3).

Table 3

Accuracy evaluation of pre- and post-DEMs

S. no.No. of sample pointsMax. residual (m)Min. residual (m)RMSE wrt. measured valuesLE90 (1.96 of RMSE)Remarks
120 2.6 −1.5 1.27 2.52 Pre-DEM 
100 1.8 −0.75 1.09 2.1 Post-DEM 
S. no.No. of sample pointsMax. residual (m)Min. residual (m)RMSE wrt. measured valuesLE90 (1.96 of RMSE)Remarks
120 2.6 −1.5 1.27 2.52 Pre-DEM 
100 1.8 −0.75 1.09 2.1 Post-DEM 

This process involved superimposing the DEMs onto their respective stereo pairs and examining errors at specific points. For the pre-event DEM, errors were evaluated on 120 points, yielding a maximum residual of 2.6 m and a minimum residual of −1.5 m. The RMSE for the pre-event DEM was found to be 1.27 m, with a linear error at 90% confidence level (LE90) of 2.52 m. The pre-event DEM was created using a combination of two stereo pairs and single-image photogrammetry, resulting in an absolute vertical accuracy of about 2.5 m and a relative vertical accuracy of 2 m. Similarly, the post-event DEM, assessed on 100 points, showed a maximum residual of 1.8 m and a minimum residual of −0.75 m. The RMSE for the post-event DEM was calculated as 1.09 m, with an LE90 of 2.1 m. This DEM was generated using a single stereo pair of satellite sensor data, with a B/H ratio of 0.32 and a stereo fusing accuracy of 60 cm, leading to a vertical accuracy of approximately 2 m. Overall, the accuracy of volumetric calculations derived from these Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) was estimated to have vertical uncertainty of approximately ±4 meters. This estimate applies to the surface differences captured in the Difference of DEMs (DoDs) analysis. The uncertainty accounts for potential errors in vertical elevation measurements as well as limitations associated with stereoscopic analysis techniques.

Comparative volumetric analysis of pre- and post-DEMs

Once the pre-event and post-event DEMs are created, they are compared by differencing to identify changes in topography. This process involves subtracting the pre-event DEM from the post-event DEM to detect alterations in the landscape. In this specific case, the analysis reveals a portion of land that has slid into the lake, triggering a wave surge. This surge subsequently caused a breach at the lake mouth, leading to significant depletion of water in lake. The topographical changes and their impacts, including the land slide, lake breach, and water depletion, are illustrated in Figure 5(a).

The perspective view of the post-event DEM, as depicted in Figure 5(b), clearly illustrates the areas affected by debris slides and water depletion due to the GLOF event. This analysis highlights the importance of accurate DEMs in understanding terrain changes and modeling future events.
Figure 5

(a) Difference of DEMs showing land slide area, lake water depletion, and lake breach at the mouth, (b) perspective view of the South Lhonak Lake as on 12 November 2023 (post event).

Figure 5

(a) Difference of DEMs showing land slide area, lake water depletion, and lake breach at the mouth, (b) perspective view of the South Lhonak Lake as on 12 November 2023 (post event).

Close modal

Results and discussion

Observations and results of the analysis derived in this study are presented in Tables 4 and 5.

Table 4

Lake water depletion computations

Water area after emptying by 32 m deep and perimeter of tank 1.491 km2, 6.679 km 
Depth of water depleted 32 m 
Max. length, Max. width, min. width 2,600 m, 760 m, 18 m 
Total volume of water emptied 43.2172 MCM 
Approximate time duration for emptying (from news papers) 3 h 
Average discharge 4,004.629629 m3/s 
Cross-section area of cut through which water emptied at the mouth 3,840 km2 
Depth of erosion at the mouth of the lake 30 m 
Water area after emptying by 32 m deep and perimeter of tank 1.491 km2, 6.679 km 
Depth of water depleted 32 m 
Max. length, Max. width, min. width 2,600 m, 760 m, 18 m 
Total volume of water emptied 43.2172 MCM 
Approximate time duration for emptying (from news papers) 3 h 
Average discharge 4,004.629629 m3/s 
Cross-section area of cut through which water emptied at the mouth 3,840 km2 
Depth of erosion at the mouth of the lake 30 m 
Table 5

Debris slide computations

Total volume of debris slide 11.5014 MCM 
Projected area of debris slide 0.2238 km2 at the water level after the event 
Max. height of debris 209 m from the water level after the event 
Total volume of debris slide 11.5014 MCM 
Projected area of debris slide 0.2238 km2 at the water level after the event 
Max. height of debris 209 m from the water level after the event 

A detailed analysis of changes in glacier lake and landslide dynamics was conducted by comparing the pre- and post-event DEMs. High-quality RISAT-1A GRD data from 4 October 2023 was used to detect deformations indicative of landslide activity. The analysis revealed significant changes in elevation and volume patterns, helping identify specific regions for further study, including landslide volume, height, and slopes. It also enabled an understanding of changes in lake outlets and the amount of water lost after the GLOF. Figure 6(a) and 6(b) presents our findings in the form of cross-section profiles of pre- and post-GLOF event, highlighting areas that require more detailed examination.
Figure 6

(b and c) Cross-sections of the before event and after event changes along AB and CD across the lake as shown in (a).

Figure 6

(b and c) Cross-sections of the before event and after event changes along AB and CD across the lake as shown in (a).

Close modal

In this study, the debris slide volume was estimated by subtracting the pre-event DEM from the post-event DEM and integrating the elevation differences in the affected areas. This resulted in a calculated total volume of 11.5014 million m³. The total projected area of debris slides up to the water level after the event is 0.2238 km², and the maximum height of debris above the water level is 202 m. These factors contributed to the mass outflow of water from the lake, causing the GLOF. The total water level drop after the event is 32 m, and the total water area and perimeter of the lake after depletion are 1.491 km² and 6.679 km, respectively. The maximum length of the lake is 2,600 m (horizontal), the maximum width is 760 m (cross-section), and the minimum width is 18 m (cross-section). After the incident, erosion occurred at the mouth of the lake, measuring 30 m. The cross-sectional area through which water emptied at the mouth is 3,840 m². Through this mouth cut, the total volume of water emptied from the lake is 43.2172 million cubic meters (MCM), with an average discharge of 4,004.63 m³/s. The total duration for the complete lake depletion is 3 h which is taken from news papers.

The methodology used in this paper enhances understanding and ability to assess GLOF events in several significant ways, with the following implications for future use of this approach.

Enhanced DEM accuracy: The use of high-resolution satellite imagery and accurate DEMs with a vertical accuracy of around 2 m allows for precise monitoring of terrain changes. This capability enhances the ability to predict potential GLOF events by identifying subtle deformations and volume changes in glacier lakes and surrounding terrains.

Volumetric calculations: Accurate volumetric calculations of debris slides and water depletion (e.g., 11.5014 million m³ of debris, 43.2172 MCM of water) provide critical data for assessing the potential impact of GLOFs. This quantitative analysis is essential for risk assessment and designing mitigation measures for future GLOFs.

Detailed terrain and water body metrics: Metrics such as lake perimeter, maximum length, width, and the area of erosion at the lake mouth help in understanding the scale and impact of GLOF events. These measurements can inform the development of models to predict the behavior of future GLOFs.

Identification of high-risk areas: The study's findings highlight specific regions with notable changes in elevation and volume patterns, which are critical for targeted monitoring and mitigation efforts. By focusing on these high-risk areas, resources can be allocated more efficiently to reduce the potential impact of future GLOFs.

Infrastructure planning: Detailed knowledge of the lake's dimensions and the dynamics of water depletion (e.g., 32 m water level drop) can inform the design and placement of infrastructure such as dams, drainage channels, and early warning systems to manage and mitigate flood risks. The study underscores the importance of continuous monitoring and technological advancements in satellite imagery and data analysis. Continued research into improving the accuracy and timeliness of GLOF predictions can drive innovation in remote sensing and geospatial technologies.

In conclusion, the novelty of this study is that it demonstrates the significance of utilizing stereo photogrammetric techniques for integrating satellite images from multiple sensors for generating pre- and post-GLOF DEMs to obtain insights into glacier lake breach dynamics, which no other paper in this context has addressed. The study has established the potential of satellite-based methods to capture a comprehensive view of glacier terrains and monitor minor changes that could lead to potential hazards. The work has employed stereo and single-image 3D photogrammetry which is first of its kind to estimate the photogrammetric volume of landslide debris, which was found to be 11.5014 MCM. Additionally, it is estimated that the volume of water emptied from the South Lhonak Lake after the breach to be 43.5 MCM. Cross-sectional changes are also derived at the lake outlet and land slide locations along with computing the depth of erosion to understand the phenomenon better. The stereo-image photogrammetry allows for multi-perspective analysis, enabling a 3D reconstruction of glacier lake landscapes before and after the event. Although the single-image 3D photogrammetric method is time-consuming due to manual mono-plotting and an iterative 3D Ray tracing process from ground cube coordinates along with refined RPCs was employed to derive the precise elevation in Part C of pre-DEM in the absence of a stereo pair. Overall, the study highlights the critical role of satellite-driven analysis in advancing the understanding of glacier lake breach dynamics, which can provide a foundation for cause and effect of glacier hazard.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Ageta
Y.
,
Naito
N.
,
Nakawo
M.
,
Fujita
K.
,
Shankar
K.
,
Pokhrel
A. P.
&
Wangda
A. D.
(
2001
)
Study project on the recent rapid shrinkage of summer-accumulation type glaciers in the Himalayas, 1997–1999
,
Bulletin of Glaciological Research
,
18
,
45
49
.
Aggarwal
S.
,
Rai
S. C.
,
Thakur
P. K.
&
Emmer
A.
(
2017
)
Inventory and recently increasing GLOF susceptibility of glacial lakes in Sikkim, Eastern Himalaya
,
Geomorphology
,
295
,
39
54
.
Alganci
U.
,
Besol
B.
&
Sertel
E.
(
2018
)
Accuracy assessment of different digital surface models
,
ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information
, 7 (3), 1–16. 10.3390/ijgi7030114.
Allen
S. K.
,
Linsbauer
A.
,
Randhawa
S. S.
,
Huggel
C.
,
Rana
C.
&
Kumari
A.
(
2016
)
Glacial lake outburst flood risk in Himachal Pradesh, India: an integrative and anticipatory approach considering current and future threats
,
National Hazards
,
84
(
3
),
1741
1763
.
Anees, M. T., Akhtar, N., Bakar, A. F. B. A. & Ishak, M. I. S. (2022) Chapter: A review on the estimation of glacial lake outburst floods (GLOFs) in the Himalayan region using remote sensing and geographic information system, Disaster Management in the Complex Himalayan Terrains, Geography of the Physical Environment, 93–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-89308-8_7.
Atefi
M. R.
&
Miura
H.
(
2021
)
Volumetric analysis of the landslide in Abe Barek, Afghanistan based on nonlinear mapping of stereo satellite imagery-derived DEMs
,
Journal of Remote Sensing
, 13 (3), 1–22. doi:10.3390/rs13030446.
Baban
S. M. J.
(
1993
)
The evaluation of different algorithms for bathymetric charting of lakes using Landsat imagery
,
International Journal of Remote Sensing
,
14
,
2263
2274
.
Barbarella
M.
,
Fiani
M.
&
Zollo
C.
(
2017
)
Assessment of DEM derived from very high-resolution stereo satellite imagery for geomorphometric analysis
,
European Journal of Remote Sensing
,
50 (1), 534–549
. DOI: 10.1080/22797254.2017.1372084.
Benny
A. H.
&
Dawson
G. J.
(
1983
)
Satellite imagery as an aid to bathymetric charting in the Red Sea
,
The Cartographic Journal
,
20
,
5
16
.
Bhushan
S.
,
Shean
D.
&
Alexandrov
O.
(
2021
)
Automated digital elevation model (DEM) generation from very-high-resolution Planet SkySat triplet stereo and video imagery
,
ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
,
173
,
151
165
.
Budhathoki
K. P.
,
Bajracharya
O. R.
&
Pokharel
B. K.
(
2010
)
Assessment of Imja Glacier Lake outburst Flood (GLOF) Risk in Dudh Koshi River Basin using remote sensing techniques
,
Journal of Hydrology and Meteorology
,
7
(1),
75–91
.
Cao
B.
,
Fang
Y.
,
Jiang
Z.
,
Gao
L.
&
Hu
H.
(
2019
)
Shallow water bathymetry from WorldView-2 stereo imagery using two-media photogrammetry
,
European Journal of Remote Sensing
,
52
(
1
),
506
521
.
Claudio Bozzini
(
2014
)
A new Tool for Obtaining Cartographic geo-Referenced Data From Single Oblique Photos
.
Evans
G. A.
,
Ramachandran
B.
,
Zhang
Z.
,
Bryan Bailey
G.
&
Cheng
P.
(
2008
)
An accuracy assessment of Cartosat-1 stereo image data-derived digital elevation models: a case study of the drum mountains, Utah
,
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
,
XXXVII
,
Part B1
,
Beijing
.
Giribabu
D.
,
Kumar
P.
,
Mathew
J.
,
Sharma
K. P.
&
Krishna Murthy
Y. V. N.
(
2013
)
DEM generation using Cartosat-1 stereo data: issues and complexities in Himalayan terrain
,
European Journal of Remote Sensing
,
46
, 431–443.
Haeberli
W.
,
Frauenfelder
R.
,
Hoelzle
M.
&
Maisch
M.
(
1999
)
On rates and acceleration trends of global glacier mass changes
,
GeografiskaAnnaler
,
81A
(
4
),
585
591
.
Halder
S.
&
Bose
S.
(
2024
)
Sustainable flood hazard mapping with GLOF: a google earth engine approach
,
Natural Hazard Research
, 4 (4), 573–578.
https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.nhres.2024.01.002
.
Janet
E.
,
Nichol
A. S.
&
Wong
M.-S.
(
2006
)
Application of high-resolution stereo satellite images to detailed landslide hazard assessment
,
Journal of Geomorphology
,
76
(
1–2
),
68
75
.
Khanal
N. R.
,
Mool
P. K.
,
Shrestha
A. B.
,
Rasul
G.
,
Kumar
P.
,
Ghimire
B.
,
Shrestha
R. B.
&
Joshi
S. P.
(
2015
)
A comprehensive approach and methods for glacial lake outburst flood risk assessment, with examples from Nepal and the trans boundary area
,
International Journal of Water Resources Development, 31 (2), 219–237. DOI: 10.1080/07900627.2014.994116
.
Krishna
B. G.
,
Amitabh
T. P.
&
Srinivasan
P.
(
2008
)
DEM generation from high resolution multi-view data product
,
The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences
,
XXXVII
,
Part B1
.
Beijing
.
Kugler
T.
&
Wendt
L.
(
2021
)
Evaluation of Digital Elevation Models Derived from Multi-Date Satellite Stereo Imagery for Urban Areas. GI_Forum
.
Kumar
M.
&
Bhardwaj
A.
(
2021
)
Building extraction from very high-resolution stereo satellite images using OBIA and topographic information
,
Environmental Science: Processes
,
5 (1), 1–13
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/IECG2020-08908
.
Marti
R.
,
Gascoin
S.
,
Berthier
E.
,
de Pinel
M.
,
Houet
T.
&
Laffly
D.
(
2016
)
Mapping snow depth in open alpine terrain from stereo satellite imagery
,
European Geoscience Union
,
10
(
4
),
1361
1380
.
TC
.
Maskey
S.
,
Kayastha
R. B.
&
Kayastha
R.
(
2020
)
Glacial Lakes Outburst Floods (GLOFs) modelling of Thulagi and Lower Barun Glacial Lakes of Nepalese Himalaya
.
Progress in Disaster Science, 7, 1–13
.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2020.100106
.
Racoviteanu
A. E.
,
Williams
W. M.
&
Barry
R. G.
(
2008
)
Optical Remote Sensing of Glacier Characteristics: A Review with Focus on the Himalaya, Published online :doi: 10.3390/s8053355
.
Robson
B. A.
,
Hölbling
D.
,
Nielsen
P. R.
&
Koller
M.
(
2022
)
Estimating the volume of the 1978 Rissa quick clay landslide in Central Norway using historical aerial imagery
,
Open Geosciences
,
14
(
1
),
252
263
.
doi:10.1515/geo-2020-0331
.
Sattara
A.
,
Ajanta Goswami
A.
,
Kulkarni
V.
,
Emmer
A.
,
Haritashya
U. K.
,
Allen
S.
,
Frey
H.
&
Huggel
C.
(
2021
)
Future Glacial Lake Outburst Flood (GLOF) hazard of the South Lhonak Lake, Sikkim Himalaya
,
Geomorphology
,
388
, 107783.
Sharma
R. K.
,
Pradhan
P.
,
Sharma
N. P.
&
Shrestha
D. G.
(
2018
)
Remote sensing and in situ-based assessment of rapidly growing South Lhonak glacial lake in eastern Himalaya, India
,
National Hazards
,
93
,
393
409
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-018-3305-0
.
Siva Subramanian
K. S.
Dr.
,
Singh
A.
&
Sudhakar
M.
(
2023
)
Evaluation of Digital Elevation Models created from different satellite images. map India. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/242114704.
Vohra
C. P.
(
2007
)
Glaciers of Asia-Glaciers of India. In: Richard, S., Williams, J.R., Jane, G.F. (Eds.), Satellite Image Atlas of Glaciers of the World. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1386-F-5, pp. 259–289
.
Wang
S. J.
,
Qin
D. H.
&
Xiao
C. D.
(
2015
)
Moraine-dammed lake distribution and outburst flood risk in the Chinese Himalaya
,
Journal of Glaciology
,
61
(
225
),
115
126
.
http://dx.doi.org/ 10.3189/2015JoG14J097
.
Welponer
M.
,
Stathopoulou
E. K.
&
Remondino
F.
(
2022
)
Monocular depth prediction in photogrammetric applications. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences Volume XLIII-B2-2022 XXIV ISPRS Congress (2022 edition): 6–11, Nice, France
.
Willneff
J.
,
Poon
J.
&
Fraser
C.
(
2005
)
Single-image high-resolution satellite data for 3d information extraction. Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote sensing
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY-ND 4.0), which permits copying and redistribution with no derivatives, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nd/4.0/).