The increasing demands of agriculture, climate change, urbanization, and industrialization are driving global groundwater (GW) depletion. Bangladesh is particularly vulnerable due to excessive extraction and climatic variability. Real-time groundwater storage (GWS) monitoring is challenging, especially in data-scarce regions, but satellite remote sensing and postprocessing techniques offer valuable alternatives. This study aims to evaluate long-term trends and identify spatial patterns in Bangladesh's GWS using NASA's Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS 2.2) data from 2004 to 2023. It employs kriging for spatial interpolation, the modified Mann–Kendall test for trend analysis, and K-means clustering to detect spatial zones. Results show four distinct GWS zones across Bangladesh. The southeast exhibits the highest GWS (1,514.90 mm), while the northwest has the lowest (783.49 mm). The modified Mann–Kendall test confirms a consistent decline in GWS in all regions: northwest (−2.84 mm/year), southwest (−4.18 mm/year), northeast (−3.65 mm/year), southeast (−3.12 mm/year), and center (−3.94 mm/year). These findings underscore the urgency of implementing region-specific groundwater management strategies. Without targeted intervention, continued depletion may severely impact water security, agricultural sustainability, and long-term ecological balance in Bangladesh.

  • Groundwater storage declined consistently across Bangladesh from 2004 to 2023.

  • K-means clustering identified four distinct groundwater zones in the country.

  • The southwest region showed the highest annual decline at 4.18 mm/year.

  • The study used GLDAS data, kriging, and trend analysis for robust insights.

  • Region-specific groundwater management is urgently needed to prevent crisis.

Groundwater (GW) is an indispensable resource that regulates residential, commercial, and agricultural activities and provides water to billions of people (Siebert et al. 2010). It is also necessary for maintaining ecosystems, assisting with climate adaptation, and ensuring global water and food security because of its consistent and crucial role in supplying fresh water (Taylor et al. 2013). In addition, GW plays a crucial role in global consumption because it is easy to access, economical, and less vulnerable to contamination than surface water (Vohra et al. 2023). However, GW depletion is a global issue driven by increased agricultural requirements, climate change, industrialization, urbanization, and unsustainable use of GW (Grogan 2016). Furthermore, the hydrological cycle is expected to be altered by rising global temperatures, resulting in lower GW recharge and more substantial evaporation (Stagl et al. 2014). In this respect, GW levels in Bangladesh are declining as a result of intensive irrigation practices, and this issue has become severe because of the exploitation of GW for agricultural purposes, particularly in the northwest (Hasanuzzaman et al. 2017). In addition, reduced rainfall, frequent droughts, and unsustainable irrigation with GW are among the factors contributing to Bangladesh's GW depletion, which leads to water scarcity for both agricultural and drinking purposes (Rahman et al. 2018). Bangladesh's irrigated agriculture is mostly dependent on GW. According to reports from 2019, 79% of Bangladesh's irrigated areas receive irrigation water from GW (Mainuddin et al. 2020). However, excessive extraction of GW has resulted in significant decreases in GW levels, with some regions experiencing annual decreases of up to 6.6 cm (Islam et al. 2021). Consequently, overextraction and alterations driven by climate change pose increasing stresses on Bangladesh's GW resources, emphasizing the importance of monitoring and understanding the spatiotemporal variations in groundwater storage (GWS) to address the risks of water scarcity and long-term sustainability.

A comprehensive understanding of GWS change is crucial for sustainable water management, although significant knowledge gaps persist. Real-time monitoring of GWS is complicated because of varying depths in sedimentary basins, affecting the relationship between storage changes and GW levels. In addition, the subsurface position of GW makes monitoring difficult, triggering sophisticated techniques such as satellite remote sensing and improved water-cycle monitoring to assess storage dynamics and variations accurately (Xu et al. 2024). Furthermore, conventional techniques for monitoring GW, such as well-based measurements, are frequently expensive and do not provide thorough spatiotemporal coverage. Few studies have used sophisticated statistical and machine-learning techniques to identify patterns, anomalies, and long-term trends in GWS, although many studies have investigated the prediction of GW levels and water quality (Ali et al. 2024). In particular, comprehensive studies employing satellite-derived GW data for systematic analysis, including long-term trend analysis, are lacking in Bangladesh. To address this gap, GW pattern and trend analysis identification can be enhanced by combining geographical and spatiotemporal factors with a log-additive neural model (Pagendam et al. 2023). In addition, merging satellite data with ground-based observations can increase model dependability and provide a more thorough understanding of GW dynamics (Chakraborty 2019). Bangladesh could improve the management of its water resources and make policy decisions that support the sustainable use of GW by applying these approaches (Qureshi et al. 2015; Zzaman et al. 2022).

Remote sensing has become an innovative instrument in GW research because it provides continuous spatial and temporal coverage and may exceed the limits of ground-based observations (Ibrahim et al. 2024). Remote sensing data, such as GLDAS, is essential for understanding GW dynamics (Ouma et al. 2015; Shen et al. 2022), addressing data scarcity (Maksud et al. 2023), and offering a cost-effective alternative to traditional methods (Fahim et al. 2024), particularly in data-limited regions like Bangladesh. The constraints of conventional ground-based approaches are overcome by this integration, which enables continuous monitoring and study of GWS patterns. GW patterns and anomalies can be identified via machine-learning algorithms to examine vast amounts of geographical data collected via remote sensing technologies (Ibrahim et al. 2024; Saha & Chandra Pal 2024). In addition, GW management strategies could be successful because of methods such as hybrid deep-learning models, which have demonstrated excellent accuracy in identifying GW recharge zones (Al-Ruzouq et al. 2024). The utilization of satellite data may provide insightful information on the dynamics of GW, which is a novel approach in Bangladesh, where comprehensive GWS studies have been limited.

This study evaluates Bangladesh's GWS dynamics via data from NASA's Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS 2.2) from 2004 to 2023 to address these knowledge gaps. The research adopts a combined approach, integrating geospatial analysis and trend analysis to accomplish two primary goals: (i) determining distinct spatial patterns in GWS via the K-means clustering algorithm and (ii) analyzing the long-term patterns in GWS using the modified Mann‒Kendall test.

To accomplish these primary objectives, we implemented the kriging method for the purpose of spatial interpolation after extracting data via Google Earth Engine (GEE). Kriging, a geostatistical method, was employed for interpolation, ensuring accurate spatial representation of GW levels (Hasan et al. 2021). The clustering that identified homogeneous zones of GWS was conducted via the K-means clustering algorithm, which efficiently revealed patterns in water distribution. In addition, significant trends and monotonic fluctuations in GWS throughout the study period were found via the modified Mann‒Kendall test, a trustworthy non-parametric technique (Cui et al. 2018). ArcGIS software conducted postprocessing and visualization of the maps and graphical outputs.

This study provides an innovative and comprehensive way to study GWS dynamics by postprocessing raw satellite data to provide a unique, long-term analysis of GWS changes. The findings of this research not only improve the understanding of GWS in Bangladesh but also provide significant insights for policymakers to help sustainable GW management in Bangladesh by highlighting important patterns and trends.

Description of the study area

Bangladesh, located in South Asia, spans 148,460 km2 and has a population exceeding 170 million (Jain et al. 2020). It shares borders with Myanmar to the southeast and India on three sides, and features a southern coastline along the Bay of Bengal. The country's low-lying geography is shaped by the Ganges, Brahmaputra, and Meghna rivers (Murshed & Kaluarachchi 2018). Its GW system consists of alluvial aquifers recharged by rainfall (1,500–3,000 mm annually) and surface water infiltration (Curtis et al. 2018). Climate change threatens GWS, highlighting Bangladesh as an important area for research (Haque 2018). Figure 1 presents the study area in Bangladesh regarding the ground water storage pattern and its trend through remote sensing.
Figure 1

Study area (Bangladesh).

Figure 1

Study area (Bangladesh).

Close modal

Data and tools

GWS data, measured in millimetres and derived from the GWS_tavg band of the Global Land Data Assimilation System (GLDAS 2.2), were initially provided at a daily temporal resolution. This dataset covers January 2003–May 2024 and was transformed into annual data for the Bangladesh boundary shapefile from the Global Administrative Unit Layers up to 2023. GLDAS data, provided at a coarse spatial resolution (∼25 km), may not capture localized GW dynamics in regions with high variability, a limitation also noted by Berhanu et al. (2024), who highlighted its inability to capture drought-induced GW loss, and Rzepecka et al. (2024), who emphasized its failure to account for the influence of ground frost and permafrost. Processing was done with GEE, while Python was used in Google Collab for statistical analyses, including the modified Mann–Kendall test and K-means clustering. ArcGIS 10.8 was used for map visualization. The overall process map of the study is presented in Figure 2.
Figure 2

Overall process map of the study.

Figure 2

Overall process map of the study.

Close modal

Data acquisition via Google Earth Engine

The initial phase of the data acquisition methodology involved importing GWS (GWS_tavg) data derived from the GLDAS 2.2 into GEE.

Subsequently, Bangladesh's geographical limits and the temporal span from 2004 to 2023 were established. GEE aggregates the daily GWS_tavg data to compute annual averages for each year encompassed within this timeframe. Sophisticated interpolation techniques utilized a 5,000 m radius to address the NoData values. The data points, which included latitude, longitude, and GWS_tavg value coordinates, were then sampled at a 25,000 m scale and subsequently exported to Google Drive as Comma-Separated Values (CSV) files.

Data preparation and analysis via Python

Selection of the interpolation method

The interpolation methodologies chosen for the study were ordinary kriging, universal kriging, and inverse distance weighting (IDW). These methodologies were evaluated via leave-one-out cross-validation (LOOCV). A range of models, including linear, spherical, exponential, and Gaussian, were examined for ordinary kriging, whereas universal kriging incorporated both linear and quadratic drift components. IDW was assessed utilizing powers of 1, 2, and 3. The efficacy of each methodology was appraised through the application of the root mean square error (RMSE), mean absolute error (MAE), mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), and coefficient of determination (R2) as evaluative metrics.

Given a dataset of n data points, with input features X = {X1, X2, … ,Xn} and corresponding target values Y = {Y1, Y2, … ,Yn}, the LOOCV process involves the following:

For each data point i in the dataset:

  • • Leave the ith point out as a test sample:

    • o Training set: Xtrain = X\Xi, Ytrain = Y\Yi

    • o Test set: Xtrain = Xi, Ytrain = Yi

The equations for these evaluation metrics are as follows:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)

In Equations (1)–(4), n is the number of observations, Yi is the actual value, is the predicted value, and Y′ is the mean of the actual values.

Interpolation of the data

GWS data for Bangladesh were processed in CSV format, which included latitude, longitude, and GWS values, to carry out the interpolation. The shapefile of the Bangladesh boundary was used to create a grid, and GWS values were estimated over the grid via the selected interpolation technique. The interpolated raster layers were clipped via the Bangladesh boundary shapefile after being stored as temporary Geographic Tagged Image File Format (GeoTIFF) files. The clipped rasters (GeoTIFF) with a cell size of 0.023378507 and 0.023378507 were utilized for K-means clustering and the modified Mann–Kendall test.

K-means clustering

The GWS data were categorized into discrete groups via K-means clustering based on similarities in GWS values. The algorithm assigns each data point to the closest cluster centroid μj to reduce the within-cluster variance. The following objective function is used:
(5)
where k represents the number of clusters, Cj is the jth cluster, and μj is the centroid of cluster j. Iterative calculations were performed to determine the centroid until convergence.
The silhouette score was calculated for every cluster to assess the clustering quality. For a specific data point i, the score s(i) is defined as follows:
(6)
where a(i) is the average distance between i and the other points in the same cluster, and b(i) is the minimum average distance between i and the closest cluster. Higher scores on the silhouette scale, ranging from −1 to 1, indicate better-defined clusters.

Modified Mann‒Kendall test

The modified Mann‒Kendall test was used to examine the GW trend over the last 20 years via the following test statistics:
(7)
where the trend in a time-series x1, x2………., xn is measured by a statistic called S, and sign(xj – xi) will be +1 if xj>xi; 0 if xj=xi; and −1 if xj<xi.
(8)
(9)
(10)
where n is the total number of observations, r1 is the time-series lag−1 autocorrelation, k is the number of linked groups, tg is the size of the gth tied group, Var(S) is the variance of S, Var(S)Modified is the modified variance of S, and n′ is the effective sample size.
(11)
The P-value is computed based on the normal approximation of Z:
(12)

In Equation (12), Φ(Z) is the cumulative distribution function of the standard normal distribution.

Sen's slope calculates a rough estimate of the slope trend from 2004 to 2023 via the following formula:
(13)

In Equation (13), xj and xi are the corresponding time points, m is the estimated slope (Sen's slope), and yj and yi are the time-series values at periods j and i, respectively.

The Z-statistic in Equation (11) and the P-value in Equation (12) were used to determine the trend's statistical significance. They focused on areas where the average P-value was less than 0.05, and the average Z-value was less than −1.96, highlighting key relevant areas.

Statistical summary

Figure 3 shows the statistical summary of GW storage in Bangladesh. From 2004 to 2008, GW storage fluctuated, with the mean value decreasing from 936.37 mm in 2004 to 909.49 mm in 2006, before recovering to 933.60 mm in 2008. The minimum level dropped significantly in 2006 (647.18 mm), indicating lower GW availability, while the maximum value remained consistently high (∼1,688–1,720 mm). Standard deviation (∼176–186 mm) suggests stable variability, but skewness (∼2.3–2.5), and kurtosis (∼5.3–5.8) indicate the presence of extremely high values. Overall, GW showed a short-term decline but remained relatively stable by 2008.
Figure 3

Statistical summary of groundwater storage in Bangladesh (2004–2023).

Figure 3

Statistical summary of groundwater storage in Bangladesh (2004–2023).

Close modal

Interpolation methods

Table 1 summarizes the interpolation performance metrics for IDW (IDW with powers of 1, 2, and 3), universal kriging (regional linear and regional quadratic models), and ordinary kriging (linear, spherical, exponential, and Gaussian models). The RMSE, MAE, MAPE, and R2 were used to evaluate each model.

Table 1

Performance matrices for different spatial interpolation methods

MethodRMSEMAEMAPE (%)R2
Ordinary kriging (linear) 159.7154 98.9191 10.6802 −0.0085 
Ordinary kriging (spherical) 51.3046 34.0637 15.1667 0.8959 
Ordinary kriging (exponential) 39.8438 25.9071 15.3406 0.9372 
Ordinary kriging (Gaussian) 79.1676 53.1727 15.006 0.7522 
Universal kriging (regional linear) 118.7143 77.3212 15.1822 0.4429 
Universal kriging (regional quadratic) 159.7154 98.9191 10.6802 −0.0085 
IDW (power = 1) 159.7077 98.6913 10.689 −0.0084 
IDW (power = 2) 159.7037 98.4702 10.6538 −0.0083 
IDW (power = 3) 159.7036 98.254 10.619 −0.0083 
MethodRMSEMAEMAPE (%)R2
Ordinary kriging (linear) 159.7154 98.9191 10.6802 −0.0085 
Ordinary kriging (spherical) 51.3046 34.0637 15.1667 0.8959 
Ordinary kriging (exponential) 39.8438 25.9071 15.3406 0.9372 
Ordinary kriging (Gaussian) 79.1676 53.1727 15.006 0.7522 
Universal kriging (regional linear) 118.7143 77.3212 15.1822 0.4429 
Universal kriging (regional quadratic) 159.7154 98.9191 10.6802 −0.0085 
IDW (power = 1) 159.7077 98.6913 10.689 −0.0084 
IDW (power = 2) 159.7037 98.4702 10.6538 −0.0083 
IDW (power = 3) 159.7036 98.254 10.619 −0.0083 

The accuracy and predictive power of interpolation techniques were evaluated. Ordinary kriging (exponential) had the lowest MAE (25.91) and RMSE (39.84) with a high R2 (0.9372), indicating superior accuracy. A high R2 reflects a strong correlation, while low RMSE and MAE suggest minimal prediction errors. In contrast, ordinary kriging (linear) and all IDW models (powers 1, 2, and 3) had negative or near-zero R2, showing poor predictive ability. Universal kriging (regional linear and quadratic) also performed worse than the exponential model. Thus, ordinary kriging (exponential) emerged as the most accurate interpolation technique in this study, aligning with Asadi & Adhikari (2022), who found that the exponential ordinary kriging reduces GW prediction errors more effectively than IDW, and Shahmohammadi-Kalalagh & Taran (2021), who identified kriging as an effective method for GW estimation.

Clusters of GW in Bangladesh

Figure 4 shows the silhouette scores for different numbers of clusters. Four clusters were chosen because they yielded the highest silhouette score (0.72), indicating the best cluster separation and cohesion.
Figure 4

Silhouette scores for different numbers of clusters.

Figure 4

Silhouette scores for different numbers of clusters.

Close modal
Figure 5 shows how GWS is distributed throughout Bangladesh, highlighting significant regional differences. The GWS clusters are divided into four classes, from Cluster 0 to Cluster 3, and a different shade of blue represents each cluster.
Figure 5

K-means cluster of groundwater storage in Bangladesh.

Figure 5

K-means cluster of groundwater storage in Bangladesh.

Close modal

Table 2 shows different statistics of different GWS clusters in Bangladesh. Cluster 0 (42.81%) is primarily located in western Bangladesh, with some extension into the northeast, and has the lowest mean GWS of 783.49 mm. Cluster 1 (47.16%) spans a significant portion of the northern and eastern regions, extending partially into the central area, with a mean storage of 894.94 mm. Cluster 2 (4.76%) is situated in the southeastern (SE) region and has the highest mean storage of 1,514.90 mm. Cluster 3 (5.27%) is also concentrated in the southeast, with a mean storage of 1,250.12 mm.

Table 2

Statistics of GWS clusters (K-means clustering) in Bangladesh

ClusterMean GWS (mm)Max GWS (mm)Min GWS (mm)SD (mm)
783.49 932.23 558.42 55.2 
894.94 1,117.35 742.2 40.91 
1,514.9 1,720.42 1,319.93 93.13 
1,250.12 1,435.31 1,014.08 92.77 
ClusterMean GWS (mm)Max GWS (mm)Min GWS (mm)SD (mm)
783.49 932.23 558.42 55.2 
894.94 1,117.35 742.2 40.91 
1,514.9 1,720.42 1,319.93 93.13 
1,250.12 1,435.31 1,014.08 92.77 

Several studies have documented regional differences in GWS throughout Bangladesh, consistent with our findings. Between 2003 and 2013, Khaki et al. (2018) reported that GWS decreased by 32%, especially in areas such as Clusters 0 and 1, where we also reported reduced storage levels. Our results of reduced GWS in Cluster 0, especially in the northwest, are also consistent with those of Kamal et al. (2022), who reported that this region has a low GW level. Furthermore, Shamsudduha et al. (2012) and Sarkar et al. (2022) reported that GW levels varied, with the former decreasing in northwest Bangladesh (corresponding to Clusters 0 and 1) and increasing in southern coastal areas of Bangladesh, which reflects greater storage in Clusters 2 and 3. The significant storage levels that we found in Cluster 3 are further supported by Sarkar et al.’s (2022) findings of greater GW potential in southern and river-adjacent regions.

Groundwater trends in Bangladesh

The modified Mann–Kendall trend analysis of GWS changes across Bangladesh, as depicted on the map (Figure 6), reveals significant regional variations. The test statistics are provided in Table 3.
Table 3

Statistics of modified Mann–Kendall test

RegionMean slope (mm/yr)Max slope (mm/yr)Min slope (mm/yr)SD (mm/yr)Mean P-valueMean Z-value
Northwestern − 2.84 − 1.18 − 5.07 1.04 0.025 − 2.291 
Southwestern − 4.18 − 1.94 − 6.45 0.86 0.016 − 2.482 
Northeastern − 3.65 − 1.01 − 6.11 1.23 0.023 − 2.331 
Southeastern − 3.12 − 1.7 − 6.32 0.92 0.026 − 2.275 
Central − 3.94 − 1.29 − 5.71 0.84 0.02 − 2.378 
RegionMean slope (mm/yr)Max slope (mm/yr)Min slope (mm/yr)SD (mm/yr)Mean P-valueMean Z-value
Northwestern − 2.84 − 1.18 − 5.07 1.04 0.025 − 2.291 
Southwestern − 4.18 − 1.94 − 6.45 0.86 0.016 − 2.482 
Northeastern − 3.65 − 1.01 − 6.11 1.23 0.023 − 2.331 
Southeastern − 3.12 − 1.7 − 6.32 0.92 0.026 − 2.275 
Central − 3.94 − 1.29 − 5.71 0.84 0.02 − 2.378 
Figure 6

Trend analysis of groundwater storage in Bangladesh (modified Mann–Kendall test).

Figure 6

Trend analysis of groundwater storage in Bangladesh (modified Mann–Kendall test).

Close modal

The highest mean slope is observed in the southwestern region with −4.18 mm/year, followed by the central region (C) with −3.94 mm/year, the northeastern region (NE) with −3.65 mm/year, and the SE region with −3.12 mm/year, and the lowest mean slope is found in the northwestern region with −2.84 mm/year. These findings indicate a substantial and consistent depletion of GWS across all regions, with the southwest experiencing the most significant decline. While the NE region shows an increase in GWS of up to 0.28 mm/yr, this finding is considered insignificant in this study.

The Mann–Kendall test reveals pronounced declines in the southwest, consistent with Janardhanan et al. (2023), who found the southern region experiencing the highest decline rate, while the northern part saw less decline. Purdy et al. (2019) reported a 0.88 cm/year decrease in northwest Bangladesh (2002–2016), which is relevant to this study. Mridha & Rahman (2021) found a 13.5% annual decline in Bogura, while Ouyang et al. (2024) observed severe GW losses in Mymensingh, Rangpur, and Rajshahi, confirming nationwide depletion. In contrast, the marginally positive trends in the northeast align with Roy et al. (2024) and Dey et al. (2023), who identified GW potential in the Bengal Basin.

These significant declines indicate severe GW depletion, likely due to excessive extraction and minimal recharge (Qureshi et al. 2015), with Monir et al. (2024) emphasizing overextraction as the primary cause. Jameel et al. (2023) observed a ∼50% shift in recharge from precipitation to stagnant water bodies. Moreover, Abdissa & Chuko (2024) noted that climate-change-induced rainfall shifts and rising temperatures have worsened GW depletion by reducing recharge. These findings highlight the need for region-specific GW management strategies, urging policymakers to enforce controlled withdrawals, recharge well construction, and alternative water use, i.e., rainwater harvesting, to enhance water availability and limit GW abstraction (Akter et al. 2024) for further depletion prevention.

This study highlights significant GW depletion in southwestern and western Bangladesh due to excessive extraction and limited recharge, worsened by climate change. In contrast, northeastern regions show stable or slightly increasing levels. There is an urgent need for targeted GW management plans to reduce overextraction and enhance recharge potential. Integrating climate resilience initiatives and sustainable farming practices is essential for protecting water resources. Key actions should include setting withdrawal limits and promoting alternative water uses. Future research should explore the links between agriculture, land use, and GW storage, using data-driven methods for better predictions. Incorporating machine-learning techniques and addressing GW quality would further improve sustainable management in Bangladesh.

The authors extend their appreciation to Taif University, Saudi Arabia, for supporting this work through project number TU-DSPP-2024-07.

Conceptualization: M.R., S.N., S.I., T.R.P., M.A.I., N.I.T.; methodology: M.R., S.N., S.I., T.R.P., M.A.I., N.I.T.; experiment conduct: M.R., S.N., S.I., T.R.P., M.A.I., N.I.T.; data curation: M.R., A.G., A.H.; formal analysis: M.R., S.N., S.I., A.G., A.H.; software: M.R., S.N., S.I., A.G., A.H.; writing – original draft preparation: M.R., S.N., S.I., T.R.P., M.A.I., N.I.T., A.G., A.H.; writing – review and editing: A.G., A.H.; supervision: A.G., A.H.; funding acquisition: A.G., A.H.; project administrator: A.G., A.H.; resource: A.G., A.H. All authors are agreed to submit the article in the journal.

This research was financially supported by Sher-e-Bangla Agricultural University, Sher-e-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka, Bangladesh. The study was funded by Taif University, Saudi Arabia (Project No. TU-DSPP-2024-07).

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Abdissa
A. G.
&
Chuko
F. W.
(
2024
)
Climate change and watershed hydrology: assessing variability in water balance components and groundwater flow patterns
,
Journal of Water and Climate Change
,
15
(
9
),
4389
4404
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.080
.
Akter
T.
,
Ahmed
S.
,
Niloy
S.
,
Rahman
M. H.
,
Singha
A.
,
Roy
S.
,
Chowdhury
A. R.
&
Sinha
B.
(
2024
)
Exploring rainwater harvesting potential for irrigation in Lackatoorah tea garden of Sylhet, Bangladesh
,
Water Harvesting Research
,
7
(
1
),
151
164
.
doi:10.22077/jwhr.2024.7902.1149
.
Ali
A. S. A.
,
Jazaei
F.
,
Babakhani
P.
,
Ashiq
M. M.
,
Bakhshaee
A.
&
Waldron
B.
(
2024
)
An overview of deep learning applications in groundwater level modeling: bridging the gap between academic research and industry applications
,
Applied Computational Intelligence and Soft Computing
,
2024
(
1
),
9480522
.
https://doi.org/10.1155/2024/9480522
.
Al-Ruzouq
R.
,
Shanableh
A.
,
Jena
R.
,
Mukherjee
S.
,
Ali Khalil
M.
,
Gibril
M. B. A.
,
Pradhan
B.
&
Atalla Hammouri
N.
(
2024
)
Hybrid deep learning and remote sensing for the delineation of artificial groundwater recharge zones
,
The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences
,
27
(
2
),
178
191
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrs.2024.02.006
.
Berhanu
K. G.
,
Lohani
T. K.
&
Hatiye
S. D.
(
2024
)
Long-term spatiotemporal dynamics of groundwater storage in the data-scarce region: Tana sub-basin, Ethiopia
,
Heliyon
,
10
(
3
),
e24474
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24474
.
Chakraborty
S.
(
2019
)
Application of remote sensing and geographical information system in groundwater study
. In:
Sikdar
P. K.
(ed.)
Groundwater Development and Management: Issues and Challenges in South Asia
.
Cham, Switzerland
.
Springer International Publishing
, pp.
171
189
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75115-3_6
.
Cui
T.
,
Raiber
M.
,
Pagendam
D.
,
Gilfedder
M.
&
Rassam
D.
(
2018
)
Response of groundwater level and surface-water/groundwater interaction to climate variability: Clarence-Moreton Basin, Australia
,
Hydrogeology Journal
,
26
(
2
),
593
614
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-017-1653-6
.
Curtis
S.
,
Crawford
T.
,
Rahman
M.
,
Paul
B.
,
Miah
M. G.
,
Islam
M. R.
&
Patel
M.
(
2018
)
A hydroclimatological analysis of precipitation in the Ganges–Brahmaputra–Meghna River Basin
,
Water
,
10
(
10
),
1359
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w10101359
.
Dey
B.
,
Abir
K. A. M.
,
Ahmed
R.
,
Salam
M. A.
,
Redowan
M.
,
Miah
M. D.
& Iqbal
M. A.
(
2023
)
Monitoring groundwater potential dynamics of northeastern Bengal Basin in Bangladesh using AHP-machine learning approaches
,
Ecological Indicators
,
154
,
110886
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.110886
.
Fahim
A. K. F.
,
Kamal
A. S. M. M.
&
Shahid
S.
(
2024
)
Modeling spatial groundwater level patterns of Bangladesh using physio-climatic variables and machine learning algorithms
,
Groundwater for Sustainable Development
,
25
,
101142
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101142
.
Grogan
D. S.
(
2016
)
Global and Regional Assessments of Unsustainable Groundwater Use in Irrigated Agriculture
.
PhD thesis. University of New Hampshire. Available at: https://scholars.unh.edu/dissertation/2.
Haque
S. E.
(
2018
)
An overview of groundwater quality in Bangladesh
. In:
Mukherjee
A.
(ed.)
Groundwater of South Asia
.
Singapore
:
Springer
, pp.
205
232
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-3889-1_13
.
Hasan
K.
,
Paul
S.
,
Chy
T. J.
&
Antipova
A.
(
2021
)
Analysis of groundwater table variability and trend using ordinary kriging: the case study of Sylhet, Bangladesh
,
Applied Water Science
,
11
(
7
),
120
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-021-01454-w
.
Hasanuzzaman
M.
,
Song
X.
,
Han
D.
,
Zhang
Y.
&
Hussain
S.
(
2017
)
Prediction of groundwater dynamics for sustainable water resource management in Bogra District, northwest Bangladesh
,
Water
,
9
(
4
),
238
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w9040238
.
Ibrahim
A.
,
Wayayok
A.
,
Shafri
H. Z. M.
&
Toridi
N. M.
(
2024
)
Remote sensing technologies for unlocking new groundwater insights: a comprehensive review
,
Journal of Hydrology X
,
23
,
100175
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydroa.2024.100175
.
Islam
M. T.
,
Hossain
M. B.
,
Roy
D.
,
Mahmud
M. N. H.
,
Paul
P. L. C.
,
Yesmin
M. S.
&
Kundu
P. K.
(
2021
)
Behaviour of groundwater table with rainfall in north-west region of Bangladesh
,
Bangladesh Rice Journal
,
25
(
2
),
85
95
.
https://doi.org/10.3329/brj.v25i2.62710
.
Jain
A. K.
,
Banerjee
D. M.
&
Kale
V. S.
(
2020
)
Geology and tectonics of Bangladesh
. In:
Jain
A. K.
,
Banerjee
D. M.
&
Kale
V. S.
(eds)
Tectonics of the Indian Subcontinent
.
Cham, Switzerland
:
Springer International Publishing
, pp.
557
576
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-42845-7_10
.
Jameel
Y.
,
Stahl
M.
,
Michael
H.
,
Bostick
B. C.
,
Steckler
M. S.
,
Schlosser
P.
,
van Geen
A.
&
Harvey
C.
(
2023
)
Shift in groundwater recharge of the Bengal Basin from rainfall to surface water
,
Communications Earth & Environment
,
4
(
1
),
14
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43247-022-00650-z
.
Janardhanan
S.
,
Islam, Md.
M.
,
Islam
M. T.
,
Peña‐Arancibia
J.
,
Hodgson
G.
,
Karim
F.
,
Mainuddin
M.
,
Islam, Md.
T.
,
Rahman, Md.
A.
&
Kirby
J. M.
(
2023
)
Groundwater balance and long-term storage trends in the regional Indo-Gangetic aquifer in northwest Bangladesh
,
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
,
49
,
101500
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101500
.
Kamal
A. S. M. M.
,
Fahim
A. K. F.
&
Shahid
S.
(
2022
)
Spatial modelling of groundwater level in Bangladesh using physio-climatic variables: machine learning and statistical approaches
,
Research Square
.
(preprint, version 1). https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2261689/v1
.
Khaki
M.
,
Forootan
E.
,
Kuhn
M.
,
Awange
J.
,
Papa
F.
&
Shum
C. K.
(
2018
)
A study of Bangladesh's subsurface water storages using satellite products and data assimilation scheme
,
Science of the Total Environment
,
625
,
963
977
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.289
.
Mainuddin
M.
,
Maniruzzaman
M.
,
Alam
M. M.
,
Mojid
M. A.
,
Schmidt
E. J.
,
Islam
M. T.
&
Scobie
M.
(
2020
)
Water usage and productivity of Boro rice at the field level and their impacts on the sustainable groundwater irrigation in the north‒west Bangladesh
,
Agricultural Water Management
,
240
,
106294
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2020.106294
.
Maksud
S.
,
Hannan
A. B.
&
Jahan
N.
(
2023
)
Assessing the potential of satellite-retrieved and Global Land Data Assimilation System-simulated soil moisture datasets for soil moisture mapping in Bangladesh, ESS Open Archive (preprint). https://doi.org/10.22541/essoar.167397457.76732597/v1
.
Monir
M. M.
,
Sarker
S. C.
&
& Islam
A. R. M. T.
(
2024
)
A critical review on groundwater level depletion monitoring based on GIS and data-driven models: global perspectives and future challenges
,
HydroResearch
,
7
,
285
300
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hydres.2024.05.001
.
Mridha
M. A. H.
&
Rahman
S. H.
(
2021
)
Prediction of groundwater trends for irrigation in Northern Bangladesh
,
Water Supply
,
21
(
6
),
2596
2614
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2021.076
.
Murshed
S. B.
&
Kaluarachchi
J. J.
(
2018
)
Scarcity of fresh water resources in the Ganges Delta of Bangladesh
,
Water Security
,
4–5
,
8
18
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasec.2018.11.002
.
Ouma
Y. O.
,
Aballa
D. O.
,
Marinda
D. O.
,
Tateishi
R.
&
Hahn
M.
(
2015
)
Use of GRACE time-variable data and GLDAS-LSM for estimating groundwater storage variability at small basin scales: a case study of the Nzoia River Basin
,
Journal of Remote Sensing
,
36
(
22
),
5707
5736
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/01431161.2015.1104743
.
Ouyang
L.
,
Zhao
Z.
,
Zhou
D.
,
Cao
J.
,
Qin
J.
,
Cao
Y.
&
He
Y.
(
2024
)
Study on the relationship between groundwater and land subsidence in Bangladesh combining GRACE and InSAR
,
Remote Sensing
,
16
(
19
),
3715
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16193715
.
Pagendam
D.
,
Janardhanan
S.
,
Dabrowski
J.
&
MacKinlay
D.
(
2023
)
A log-additive neural model for spatiotemporal prediction of groundwater levels
,
Spatial Statistics
,
55
,
100740
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spasta.2023.100740
.
Purdy
A. J.
,
David
C. H.
,
Sikder
M. S.
,
Reager
J. T.
,
Chandanpurkar
H. A.
,
Jones
N. L.
&
Matin
M. A.
(
2019
)
An open-source tool to facilitate the processing of GRACE observations and GLDAS outputs: an evaluation in Bangladesh
,
Frontiers in Environmental Science
,
7
,
155
.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00155
.
Qureshi
A. S.
,
Ahmad
Z. U.
&
Krupnik
T. J.
(
2015
)
Moving from resource development to resource management: problems, prospects and policy recommendations for sustainable groundwater management in Bangladesh
,
Water Resources Management
,
29
(
12
),
4269
4283
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-015-1059-y
.
Rahman
A. T. M. S.
,
Hosono
T.
,
Mazumder
Q. H.
&
Jahan
C. S.
(
2018
)
Sustainable groundwater management in context of climate change in northwest Bangladesh
. In:
Komatina, D. (ed.)
Achievements and Challenges of Integrated River Basin Management
.
London, UK
:
IntechOpen
,
pp. 101–120. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.73305
.
Roy
S. K.
,
Hasan
M. M.
,
Mondal
I.
,
Akhter
J.
,
Roy
S. K.
,
Talukder
S.
,
Islam
A. K. M. S.
,
Rahman
A.
&
Karuppannan
S.
(
2024
)
Empowered machine learning algorithm to identify sustainable groundwater potential zone map in Jashore District, Bangladesh
,
Groundwater for Sustainable Development
,
25
,
101168
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2024.101168
.
Rzepecka
Z.
,
Biryło
M.
,
Jarsjö
J.
,
Cao
F.
&
Pietroń
J.
(
2024
)
Groundwater storage variations across climate zones from southern Poland to Arctic Sweden: comparing GRACE-GLDAS models with well data
,
Remote Sensing
,
16
(
12
),
2104
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs16122104
.
Saha
A.
&
Chandra Pal
S.
(
2024
)
Application of machine learning and emerging remote sensing techniques in hydrology: a state-of-the-art review and current research trends
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
632
,
130907
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130907
.
Sarkar
S. K.
,
Esraz-Ul-Zannat
M.
,
Das
P. C.
&
Ekram
K. M. M.
(
2022
)
Delineating the groundwater potential zones in Bangladesh
,
Water Supply
,
22
(
4
),
4500
4516
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2022.113
.
Shahmohammadi-Kalalagh
S.
&
Taran
F.
(
2021
)
Evaluation of the classical statistical, deterministic and geostatistical interpolation methods for estimating the groundwater level
,
International Journal of Energy and Water Resources
,
5
(
1
),
33
42
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/S42108-020-00094-1
.
Shamsudduha
M.
,
Taylor
R. G.
&
Longuevergne
L.
(
2012
)
Monitoring groundwater storage changes in the highly seasonal humid tropics: validation of GRACE measurements in the Bengal Basin
,
Water Resources Research
,
48
(
2
),
W02508
.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR010993
.
Shen
Y.
,
Zheng
W.
,
Zhu
H.
,
Yin
W.
,
Xu
A.
,
Pan
F.
,
Wang
Q.
&
Zhao
Y.
(
2022
)
Inverted algorithm of groundwater storage anomalies by combining the GNSS, GRACE/GRACE-FO, and GLDAS: a case study in the North China Plain
,
Remote Sensing
,
14
(
22
),
5683
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225683
.
Siebert
S.
,
Burke
J.
,
Faures
J. M.
,
Frenken
K.
,
Hoogeveen
J.
,
Döll
P.
&
Portmann
F. T.
(
2010
)
Groundwater use for irrigation – a global inventory
,
Hydrology and Earth System Sciences
,
14
(
10
),
1863
1880
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-14-1863-2010
.
Stagl
J.
,
Mayr
E.
,
Koch
H.
,
Hattermann
F. F.
&
Huang
S.
(
2014
)
Effects of climate change on the hydrological cycle in Central and Eastern Europe
. In:
Rannow
S.
&
Neubert
M.
(eds)
Managing Protected Areas in Central and Eastern Europe under Climate Change
.
Dordrecht, The Netherlands
:
Springer
, pp.
31
43
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7960-0_3
.
Taylor
R. G.
,
Scanlon
B.
,
Döll
P.
,
Rodell
M.
,
van Beek
R.
,
Wada
Y.
,
Longuevergne
L.
,
Leblanc
M.
,
Famiglietti
J. S.
,
Edmunds
M.
,
Konikow
L.
,
Green
T. R.
,
Chen
J.
,
Taniguchi
M.
,
Bierkens
M. F. P.
,
MacDonald
A.
,
Fan
Y.
,
Maxwell
R. M.
,
Yechieli
Y.
,
Gurdak
J. J.
,
Allen
D. M.
,
Shamsudduha
M.
,
Hiscock
K.
,
Yeh
P. J.-F.
,
Holman
I.
&
Treidel
H.
(
2013
)
Ground water and climate change
,
Nature Climate Change
,
3
(
4
),
322
329
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1744
.
Vohra
P.
,
Kakodia
A. K.
,
Lal
S.
&
Tanwar
K.
(
2023
)
Review on physicochemical characteristics of ground water and their health effects
,
Journal of Mechanical and Construction Engineering (JMCE)
,
3
(
1
),
1
8
.
https://doi.org/10.54060/jmce.v3i1.30
.
Xu
P.
,
Yan
D.
,
Weng
B.
,
Bian
J.
,
Wu
C.
&
Wang
H.
(
2024
)
Evolution trends and driving factors of groundwater storage, recharge, and discharge in the Qinghai‒Tibet Plateau: study progress and challenges
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
631
,
130815
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2024.130815
.
Zzaman
R. U.
,
Nowreen
S.
,
Khan
I. M.
,
Islam
M. R.
,
Ibtehaz
N.
,
Rahman
M. S.
,
Zahid
A.
,
Farzana
D.
,
Sharmin
A.
&
Rahman
M. S.
(
2022
)
A machine learning-based approach for groundwater mapping
,
Natural Resources Research
,
31
(
1
),
281
299
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11053-021-09977-4
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).