A deeper understanding of spatiotemporal processes of baseflow is critical to maintaining the ecological health and functioning of alpine rivers. However, patterns of future changes in baseflow are rarely assessed. Here, a coupled model framework integrating the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6, future land use simulation model, and Soil and Water Assessment Tool was proposed. It was employed to identify hydrological spatiotemporal variation under future climate scenarios and land use changes in the source region of the Yangzte River (SRYR). Results illustrated that land use changed little before 2000, and the main change (transition from bare land to grassland in the mid-lower reaches of the Tongtian River) occurred from 2000 to 2010. Temporally, baseflow exhibited significant upward trends under ssp126, ssp245, and ssp370, and they all followed a unimodal intra-annual distribution. The contrast was the baseflow index (BFI) presented a bimodal distribution. Spatially, baseflow increased gradually from northwest to southeast. In all scenarios, the maximum baseflow was downstream of the Tongtian River. The Tongtian River had the highest BFI, followed by the Dangqu, Tuotuo, and Chumaer rivers. The baseflow and BFI were controlled by a combination of factors, including precipitation, temperature, human activity, vegetation coverage, and terrain. Our findings could offer insight into the spatiotemporal evolution and driving mechanisms of the SRYR water resources.

  • An integrated model framework incorporating SWAT, CMIP6, FLUS, and digital filtering technology was used to determine spatiotemporal changes in baseflow.

  • An ensemble of CMIP6 models under four shared socioeconomic pathways reduced forecast uncertainty.

  • The spatiotemporal distribution of the baseflow and baseflow index were controlled by a combination of factors.

Global climate change is intensifying regional and global water cycles, and may significantly impact fragile socioeconomic and ecological environmental systems (Zhang et al. 2017). The water cycle is impacted by various factors, such as the climate, land use, and human activities, and its evolution exhibits complex coupling characteristics with high uncertainty and high randomness (Jian et al. 2023; Zeng et al. 2024). By combining different shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs) with representative concentration pathways and incorporating the impact of socioeconomic development, Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) was released in 2021/2022, providing important data support for future climate-change projections and evolution mechanisms (O'Neill et al. 2016; Güven et al. 2024). The spatial resolution and physical parameters of CMIP6 are better optimized than those of CMIP5 (Eyring et al. 2016; Meinshausen et al. 2017). Anthropogenic activities, particularly land use, have an appreciable influence on the hydrological cycle. Therefore, research has begun to focus on the hydrological processes of basins under the combined impact of land use and land cover change (LUCC), and climate change (Da Silva Cruz et al. 2022). Owing to the interaction between climate change and human activities, global land use has undergone substantial changes (Gao et al. 2024). Land use change simulation models are widely used to project future regional land use. Many studies have used the Conversion of Land Use and its Effects at Small regional extent (CLUE-S), Cellular Automata (CA), and Future Land Use Simulation (FLUS) models to research land-use pattern evolution, hydrology, and water resources (Qi et al. 2024; Qiao et al. 2024). The CMIP6 and FLUS models provide highly credible simulation ranges to investigate climate change and LUCC (Guo, H. et al. 2022; Kang et al. 2023; Wang et al. 2024), providing a basis for analyzing the spatiotemporal evolution and driving mechanisms of hydrological components under changing environmental conditions.

Baseflow, which comprises previous rainfall and is recharged via slow interflow, is a considerable component in the hydrological cycle of a basin, providing a sustainable water source for rivers and thereby maintaining life in and around them (Guo, X. et al. 2022). Baseflow is also the most stable source of river runoff, particularly during periods of drought or low precipitation, and is essential for maintaining the ecological environment of rivers (Ficklin et al. 2016; Shao et al. 2022). Therefore, it is critical to identify the spatiotemporal evolution characteristics of baseflow to understand the subsurface water cycle and the pattern of evolution in changing environments. Following increased recognition of the significance of baseflow in the water cycle of rivers, researchers have begun to examine the dynamic characteristics of baseflow and the factors that influence it (Hu et al. 2017; Waterman et al. 2022; Li et al. 2023). Sun et al. (2021) analyzed seasonal and spatial variations in baseflow and identified the factors contributing to these changes. Ahiablame et al. (2017) investigated the spatiotemporal change of annual baseflow in the Missouri River Basin, considering the impact of climate change and agricultural land use. Mao et al. (2024) studied spatiotemporal changes of baseflow at the basin scale using the Hydrograph Separation Program (HYSEP), United Kingdom Institute of Hydrology (UKIH), and digital filter methods. Waterman et al. (2022) analyzed the spatiotemporal changes in runoff and baseflow in an interregional precipitation gradient basin. Wu et al. (2019) used the elastic coefficient method to identify the factors driving changes in baseflow on the Loess Plateau, finding that the fluctuations in the baseflow index (BFI) were mainly dominated by climatic factors. Adnan et al. (2022) employed hydrological simulations to reveal the spatiotemporal characteristics of the baseflow of the Gilgit River and quantified the average relative contributions of snow meltwater, glacier meltwater, and rainfall runoff to the baseflow. Yang et al. (2020) identified the response of baseflow in different geomorphology types in the midstream of the Yellow River to ecological construction and climate change. There were positive correlations between baseflow and precipitation, snowfall, sediment concentration, surface slope, elevation, grassland proportion, and wasteland but negative correlations between baseflow and temperature, potential evapotranspiration, silt and clay content, agriculture proportion, and shrubland (Rumsey et al. 2015; Huang et al. 2021).

The source region of the Yangzte River (SRYR) is located in Zaduo County, Qinghai Province, which is characterized by high altitudes and low temperatures. It is often referred to as the ‘Changjiang Water Tower’ owing to its importance as a water resource and a water ecological security barrier (Xu et al. 2019). Recently, the SRYR has experienced considerable impacts from global warming and anthropogenic activities (Cui et al. 2023). These changes have resulted in altered hydrological processes, which could have detrimental effects on the ecosystem (Rounce et al. 2023). The baseflow, which is the primary source of runoff in the SRYR, plays a critical role in sustaining this region's ecological environment (Wu et al. 2024). Wu et al. (2024) used the Budyko and correlation analysis method to investigate the dynamic characteristics and influencing factors of baseflow in the SRYR. Previous research has primarily focused on temporal analysis of baseflow characteristics (Shao et al. 2022; Li & Fan 2023), and few studies have attempted to explore the spatial variability of baseflow and its future change. The distributed hydrological model offers new opportunities for research on the spatialization and quantification of baseflow. Some scholars have employed the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) model to examine hydrological processes in the SRYR. In a prior study conducted by Luo (2021), a SWAT model was implemented in the SRYR to quantitatively identify the response characteristics of hydrological processes to ecological engineering. Yuan, Z. et al. (2019) utilized the SWAT model to estimate the spatiotemporal distribution characteristics of water resources in the SRYR, while Ahmed et al. (2022) applied the model to simulate the runoff process in the SRYR and quantitatively analyze the impact of climate change and LUCC on streamflow. These findings indicate that the SWAT model is an effective tool for hydrological simulation in the SRYR and can be widely used.

Most research on baseflow variations has involved historical patterns and influencing mechanisms, with few studies examining future spatiotemporal evolution and driving forces. In our study, a framework was established for examining the spatiotemporal variation of future baseflow by conducting a scenario simulation of future climate and land use patterns, as shown in Figure 1. The SWAT model, coupled with two-parameter digital filtering, the CMIP6 multi-scenario model, and the FLUS model, was used to evaluate historical and future variations of baseflow in the SRYR. Additionally, the impacts of meteorological factors and LUCC on baseflow variation were analyzed. Our research not only quantified spatiotemporal variation of baseflow in the SRYR but also clarified the response of baseflow and BFI to meteorological factors and LUCC. Our work provides insights into the analysis of the spatiotemporal evolution and driving mechanisms of water resources and can also serve as a guide for similar studies in other watersheds.
Figure 1

Framework for estimating baseflow coupled with climate change and LUCC.

Figure 1

Framework for estimating baseflow coupled with climate change and LUCC.

Close modal

Study area

The SRYR is located on the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau (Figure 2), which has a high altitude, low temperatures, glaciers, snow cover, and frozen soil (Ahmed et al. 2020b). It plays a key function in water resource regulation and climate modulation for the mid-lower reaches of the Yangzte River (Xu et al. 2019). The regional topography exhibits higher elevation in the northwest and lower elevation in the southeast (Yu et al. 2013), with altitudes ranging from 3,480 to 6,580 m. This area is located within the regions of the continental plateau sub-cold zone and plateau cold zone. Glaciers occur predominantly along the northern slope of Tanggula Mountain, at Sejier Mountain, and on the southern slope of Kunlun Mountain. The SRYR is composed of the Tuotuo, Dangqu, Chumaer, and Tongtian rivers. The total length of the SRYR is 1,174 km, and its catchment area is 13.77 × 104 km2. The annual average temperature is −3.1 °C, and it increases from northwest to southeast (Yuan, J. et al. 2019; Ahmed et al. 2020a). The annual precipitation, which decreases steadily from south to north, ranges from 250 to 600 mm, and the annual runoff is 132 × 108 m3. The runoff and precipitation within the basin exhibit similar intra-annual distribution patterns, with 60%–80% occurring during the warm season.
Figure 2

Location of the study area and distribution of hydrometeorological stations in the SRYR.

Figure 2

Location of the study area and distribution of hydrometeorological stations in the SRYR.

Close modal

Data sources

SWAT model input data

The construction of a SWAT model requires the preparation of terrain, land use pattern, soil property, and hydrometeorological data. Meteorological data were acquired from the Qinghai Hydrology and Water Resources Forecasting Centre (QHHWC), and hydrological data were collected from the Zhimenda gauging station. The aforementioned data are presented in Table 1. It is noted that the spatial distribution characteristics of land use in the SRYR in 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, and 2020 can be found in the Supplementary Material.

Table 1

SWAT model data acquisition and basic information

DataDetailsSource
DEM map 90 m resolution https://www.gscloud.cn 
Land use data 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, 2020; 30 m resolution https://www.resdc.cn/Default.aspx 
Soil type map 1 km resolution Harmonized World Soil Database v 1.2 
Meteorology Daily data for 1965–2014 QHHWC 
Hydrology Monthly data for 1965–2014 Zhimenda gauging station 
DataDetailsSource
DEM map 90 m resolution https://www.gscloud.cn 
Land use data 1980, 1990, 2000, 2010, 2020; 30 m resolution https://www.resdc.cn/Default.aspx 
Soil type map 1 km resolution Harmonized World Soil Database v 1.2 
Meteorology Daily data for 1965–2014 QHHWC 
Hydrology Monthly data for 1965–2014 Zhimenda gauging station 

Climate model data

In our study, nine CMIP6 model datasets were selected as SWAT model inputs (Table 2). Four SSPs, namely ssp126, ssp245, ssp370, and ssp585, were selected to represent different socioeconomic development path models (Jian et al. 2023). Bilinear interpolation and quantile mapping (QM) methods were used to downscale and correct the model data. Finally, the multi-model ensemble (MME) method was used to further improve the accuracy of model prediction.

Table 2

Basic information for the nine CMIP6 model datasets

Model nameResearch institutionSpatial resolution (latitude × longitude)Country
ACCESS-ESM1-5 CSIRO-BOM 1.875° × 1.250° Australia 
BCC-CSM2-MR BCC 1.125° × 1.125° China 
CanESM5 CCCMA 2.813° × 2.813° Canada 
CMCC-ESM2 CMCC 1.25° × 0.94° Italy 
CNRM-CM6-1 CNRM-CERFACE 1.406° × 1.400° France 
IPSL-CM6A-LR IPSL 2.500° × 1.259° France 
MRI-ESM2-0 MRI 1.125° × 1.125° Japan 
NorESM2-LM NCC 2.5° × 1.9° Norway 
NorESM2-MM NCC 1.25° × 0.9° Norway 
Model nameResearch institutionSpatial resolution (latitude × longitude)Country
ACCESS-ESM1-5 CSIRO-BOM 1.875° × 1.250° Australia 
BCC-CSM2-MR BCC 1.125° × 1.125° China 
CanESM5 CCCMA 2.813° × 2.813° Canada 
CMCC-ESM2 CMCC 1.25° × 0.94° Italy 
CNRM-CM6-1 CNRM-CERFACE 1.406° × 1.400° France 
IPSL-CM6A-LR IPSL 2.500° × 1.259° France 
MRI-ESM2-0 MRI 1.125° × 1.125° Japan 
NorESM2-LM NCC 2.5° × 1.9° Norway 
NorESM2-MM NCC 1.25° × 0.9° Norway 

Driving forces data for the FLUS model

LUCC is affected by anthropogenic activity and natural events. A series of factors related to the natural ecology and social economy, including digital elevation model (DEM), slope, aspect, precipitation, temperature, water distribution, gross domestic product (GDP), population density, and distance to roads, was selected as driving factor data for the FLUS model (Table 3). The spatial distribution of these main driving forces of LUCC can be found in the Supplementary Material.

Table 3

Driving forces data of LUCC for the FLUS model

Driving forces factorsDataSources
Natural factors DEM (m) https://www.resdc.cn/Default.aspx 
Slope (°) 
Aspect 
Precipitation (mm) 
Temperature (°C) 
Distance to water (mm) 
Human activity GDP (104 yuan/km2OpenStreetMap (https://download.geofabrik.de/
Population density (individuals/km2
Distance to roads (m) 
Driving forces factorsDataSources
Natural factors DEM (m) https://www.resdc.cn/Default.aspx 
Slope (°) 
Aspect 
Precipitation (mm) 
Temperature (°C) 
Distance to water (mm) 
Human activity GDP (104 yuan/km2OpenStreetMap (https://download.geofabrik.de/
Population density (individuals/km2
Distance to roads (m) 

Methodology

SWAT model

The SWAT model has been widely applied to carry out hydrological simulations in cold regions based on physical mechanisms, as it can simulate the snowmelt runoff process well (Shukla et al. 2021; Zhao et al. 2022; Biswas & Biswas 2024). It performs distributed hydrological process simulation by dividing the basin into sub-basins and hydrological response units (HRUs) (Zhu et al. 2022). In our study, the SRYR was divided into 31 subcatchments and 305 HRUs. The land use patterns were categorized into six major types, and the soil characteristics were divided into 13 categories. We completed the performance evaluation of the SWAT model by using the coefficient of determination (R2) and the Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency (NSE) (Chen et al. 2023).

Baseflow separation approaches

The digital filtering method assumes that the river runoff is the superposition of surface runoff (high-frequency component) and baseflow (low-frequency component), so as to separate the baseflow from the runoff. This study adopted the two-parameter digital filtering method presented by Eckhardt (2008). Wu et al. (2024) found that the Eckhardt method showed strong adaptability in baseflow segmentation in the SRYR. The calculation equation is as follows:
(1)
(2)
where and denote baseflow at time i and time − 1, respectively; is the observed runoff at i; denotes the recession constant number; and is the maximum .

Trend analysis

The Theil–Sen median is a non-parametric trend calculation method that provides a robust estimation of the data trend. The Mann–Kendall (MK) method is a non-parametric method suitable for analyzing trends in meteorological and hydrological series with a non-normal distribution, and is not affected by a few interference values (Farris et al. 2021). The Theil–Sen median has high calculation capacity and is not sensitive to measurement errors and outliers. It is applicable for the trend analysis of long-term hydrometeorological data series. In our study, Theil–Sen was employed to calculate the time-series trend value, and MK to detect its significance (Da Silva et al. 2015; Xue et al. 2022).

The Theil–Sen median can be represented by the following equation:
(3)
where and represent hydrometeorological series; represents an increasing trend in the time series; and represents a declining trend.
The test statistic S can be expressed by the following equation:
(4)
where denotes the sign function. When is lower than, equal to, or more than zero, calculated results are −1, 0, or 1, respectively. S can be expressed as .
The MK can be expressed as follows:
(5)

For , the time series data has a notable trend if .

Downscaling and evaluation

Owing to the complexity of climate change, global climate models (GCMs) continue to have certain shortcomings, such as coarse spatial resolution, poor extreme value simulation ability, and regional difference system deviation, which make it difficult to use them directly for the simulation and prediction of regional climate and hydrological cycle processes. As the load data of the SWAT model, GCMs should be downscaled according to the data of the regional measured stations. In this paper, the QM method was selected because it performs well in climate-model bias correction (Dinh & Aires 2023; Li et al. 2024). Based on the measured data, the formula for correcting the deviation of GCM simulation data is as follows:
(6)
where represents the raw GCM data, is the empirical cumulative distribution function (ECDF) of the GCM data, is the inverse function of the ECDF for the measured data, and is the GCM data after bias correction.
The Taylor plot (Taylor 2001) is a visualization tool for meteorological data analysis, which is frequently used to comprehensively evaluate the applicability of different climate models (Fahad et al. 2018; Schoof et al. 2019). Its three main parameters are calculated as follows:
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
where n is the total number of grid points in the study area; r and f represent the observation and simulation series, respectively; and are the mean values of the observation and simulation series, respectively; and denote the standard deviations for the observation and simulation series, respectively; and R and denote the correlation coefficient and root mean square error, respectively.

FLUS model

The FLUS model was proposed by Liu et al. (2017) to simulate future land use pattern changes based on a comprehensive consideration of natural and human factors. The FLUS model couples back-propagation artificial neural networks and roulette selection to enhance the performance of various LUCC modeling techniques. In our study, the FLUS model was applied to predict the land use spatial distribution of SRYR in 2040. First, based on historical data, the Markov model predicts the numbers of various future land use patterns in the SRYR. Second, taking the influence of various driving forces, including precipitation, temperature, terrain, distance to roads, and GDP, into account, the FLUS model is applied to estimate the general transformation probability of a cell. Then, the transformation type of the cell is determined, and the future land use spatial pattern of SRYR is obtained.

To estimate the land use spatial pattern of the SRYR in 2040 based on the land use pattern in 2020, the Markov method was applied to forecast the requirement of a variety of land use patterns in 2020. The land use spatial distribution pattern of the SRYR in 2020 was obtained through parameter setting and execution of CA to estimate the type of cellular transformation. The estimated results were compared with the actual pattern in 2020. Under the condition that the kappa coefficient was greater than 0.7, based on the baseline data in 2020, the FLUS model was used to estimate the land use spatial distribution in 2040.

SWAT model performance

The Zhimenda gauging station is located at the outlet of the Tongtian River, which controls a basin area of 137,704 km2. The SWAT model was calibrated and validated by using the discharge data of the station in the SRYR. The results show that the NSE was 0.84 and 0.87 and the R2 was 0.88 and 0.91 in the calibration and validation periods, respectively (Figure 3). These results suggested that the SWAT model performed well in the SRYR. In terms of a slightly better performance in the validation period of our model, we think there may be two reasons. On the one hand, it is possible that this difference in performance between the calibration and validation periods was within the range of model errors, and on the other hand, compared with the calibration period, the runoff time-series in the validation period had a non-consistent change under the influence of ecological engineering construction. It was worth stating that this phenomenon that the model performance in the validation period was better also often occurred in other studies (Wu et al. 2021; Qin et al. 2025).
Figure 3

Comparison of observed and simulated values during the calibration and validation periods.

Figure 3

Comparison of observed and simulated values during the calibration and validation periods.

Close modal

Spatiotemporal variation in environmental factors, baseflow, and BFI

Temporal variation in environmental factors, baseflow, and BFI

The trends of annual precipitation, temperature, snowmelt, potential evaporation, baseflow, and BFI, and whether these trends were significant (α = 0.05) are presented in Table 4. The results indicated a significant rising trend in precipitation and temperature, whereas other factors showed an insignificant increasing trend.

Table 4

Trend analysis of precipitation, temperature, snowmelt, potential evaporation, baseflow, and BFI from 1965 to 2014 in the SRYR

Meteorology and hydrologyDate rangeβ|Z|Trend
Precipitation 1965–2014 1.6363 2.921 S + 
Temperature 1965–2014 0.0374 5.666 S + 
Snowmelt 1965–2014 0.0813 0.777 In + 
Potential evaporation 1965–2014 0.6302 1.554 In + 
Baseflow 1965–2014 1.5574 1.906 In + 
BFI 1965–2014 0.0002 1.751 In + 
Meteorology and hydrologyDate rangeβ|Z|Trend
Precipitation 1965–2014 1.6363 2.921 S + 
Temperature 1965–2014 0.0374 5.666 S + 
Snowmelt 1965–2014 0.0813 0.777 In + 
Potential evaporation 1965–2014 0.6302 1.554 In + 
Baseflow 1965–2014 1.5574 1.906 In + 
BFI 1965–2014 0.0002 1.751 In + 

S, significant; In, insignificant; +, increase.

Figure 4 shows the inter- and intra-annual variations in precipitation, temperature, snowmelt, potential evaporation, baseflow, and BFI in the SRYR from 1965 to 2014. The largest variation observed was in the interannual temperature, with a coefficient of variation of 0.308, an annual maximum value of −1.21 °C, and a minimum value of −5.19 °C. In contrast, the interannual variations of BFI and potential evapotranspiration were relatively small, with coefficients of variation of 0.014 and 0.062, respectively. Baseflow and snowmelt showed relatively high interannual variations, with variation coefficients of 0.287 and 0.257, respectively. Precipitation exhibited a moderate interannual variation, with a variation coefficient of 0.165.
Figure 4

Interannual and intra-annual variations in (a, b) PCP, SNW, TMP, and PET and (c, d) BF and BFI for the SRYR (1965–2014). (PCP, precipitation; SNW, snowmelt; TMP, temperature; PET, potential evaporation; BF, baseflow; BFI, baseflow index; CV, coefficient of variation.)

Figure 4

Interannual and intra-annual variations in (a, b) PCP, SNW, TMP, and PET and (c, d) BF and BFI for the SRYR (1965–2014). (PCP, precipitation; SNW, snowmelt; TMP, temperature; PET, potential evaporation; BF, baseflow; BFI, baseflow index; CV, coefficient of variation.)

Close modal

The intra-annual distribution data showed that precipitation, temperature, and baseflow followed a unimodal distribution pattern, with maximum values occurring in July. In contrast, BFI and snowmelt displayed a bimodal distribution pattern. The BFI exhibited a downward trend from January to April, followed by a subsequent increase, reaching a first peak in May, a decrease again until June, and a steady increase culminating in a second peak in November. In contrast, snowmelt presented a rising trend from January to April, with a first maximum occurring in May, followed by decreasing and increasing trends with a second maximum in October.

Spatial variation in environmental factors, baseflow, and BFI

Figure 5 depicts the spatial variability of temperature, precipitation, snowmelt, potential evaporation, baseflow, and BFI in the SRYR. Precipitation and snowmelt values in the downstream area of the basin were relatively high, with precipitation ranging from 400 to 518 mm and snowmelt ranging from 80 to 100 mm. Conversely, potential evaporation exhibited a downward trend from the upper reaches to the lower reaches, with the highest value distributed in the upstream region of the Tuotuo River. Temperature demonstrated a continuous increase from northwest to southeast. The spatial variation of baseflow mirrored that of precipitation, with the highest value located in the downstream region of the Tongtian River. The highest BFI value of the entire basin was at the Tongtian River, reaching a value of 0.92, followed by the Dangqu River. The Chumaer River had the lowest BFI value.
Figure 5

Spatial distribution of (a) mean annual precipitation, (b) snowmelt, (c) baseflow, (d) potential evaporation, (e) temperature, and (f) BFI in the SRYR.

Figure 5

Spatial distribution of (a) mean annual precipitation, (b) snowmelt, (c) baseflow, (d) potential evaporation, (e) temperature, and (f) BFI in the SRYR.

Close modal
Figure 6 shows the change trends of meteorological factors, baseflow and BFI and their statistical significance in the SRYR from 1965 to 2014. According to Figure 6(a), the precipitation in most areas of SRYR showed a significant increasing trend, while that in the lower reaches of the Tongtian River did not pass the significance test. As shown in Figure 6(b), the potential evaporation in the lower reaches of the Tongtian River showed a significant increasing trend, and that in the northeastern region of the SRYR revealed a significant decreasing trend. The temperature in the SRYR exhibited a significant increasing trend (Figure 6(d)). Figure 6(e) shows that the β of baseflow ranged from 0.22 to 1.92, and the middle and lower reaches of Chumaer River and Tongtian River pass the significance test of increasing trend. The significance test results indicated a slightly increasing trend in the BFI in the SRYR approximately (Figure 6(f)).
Figure 6

β and |Z| spatial variation of meteorological factors, baseflow, and BFI in the SRYR from 1965 to 2014.

Figure 6

β and |Z| spatial variation of meteorological factors, baseflow, and BFI in the SRYR from 1965 to 2014.

Close modal

Analysis and simulation of LUCC

Analysis of LUCC

LUCC is a significant factor in the study of the spatiotemporal evolution of hydrological processes in watersheds. Figure 7 displays the spatial distribution of LUCC in the SRYR every ten years from 1980 to 2020. Prior to 2000, the change in land use patterns was minimal. However, between 2000 and 2010, significant transitions occurred, such as the transformation from bare land to grassland in the mid-lower reaches of the Tongtian River and the transformation from grassland to bare land in the upstream of the Tuotuo River.
Figure 7

Spatial distribution map of LUCC in the SRYR every 10 years from 1980 to 2020.

Figure 7

Spatial distribution map of LUCC in the SRYR every 10 years from 1980 to 2020.

Close modal
To better understand the transformations between a variety of land use patterns in the SRYR, a visualization analysis of the land use evolution path in three time-periods was conducted using Sankey diagrams (Figure 8). The results exhibited that the primary land use types in the SRYR were grassland, bare land, and water bodies, and they can be converted into one another. The conversion from bare land to grassland was the most pronounced, and transfers from grassland or other land use types to bare land also occurred occasionally.
Figure 8

Mutual transformation of land use pattern in the SRYR over three time periods (1980, 2000, and 2020). Note: AL, FL, PL, WR, UL, and BL denote arable land, woodland, grassland, water, towns, and bare land.

Figure 8

Mutual transformation of land use pattern in the SRYR over three time periods (1980, 2000, and 2020). Note: AL, FL, PL, WR, UL, and BL denote arable land, woodland, grassland, water, towns, and bare land.

Close modal

Land use estimation and evaluation

A comparison of the simulated pattern of land use in 2020 with its actual pattern (as shown in Figure 9) revealed a high level of consistency, demonstrating a high degree of simulation accuracy in the SRYR. The detailed maps of regions A, B, and C displayed significant consistency in several land use types (Figure 9). Furthermore, the simulation results were analyzed quantitatively. The kappa coefficient of the SRYR was 0.79, the MSE was 0.22, and the overall accuracy was 90%, which indicates excellent simulation robustness. The three local zooms showed obvious consistency between the simulation and actual patterns. Therefore, it is possible to estimate the land use pattern of the SRYR in 2040 by using the actual land use pattern and related driving forces in 2020 as the baseline data.
Figure 9

Accuracy verification of land use pattern simulation results for 2020 and pattern prediction for 2040. (Actual pattern in 2020: spatial distribution pattern of actual land use in 2020; simulated pattern in 2020, and simulated pattern in 2040: spatial distribution pattern of simulated land use in 2020 and 2040.)

Figure 9

Accuracy verification of land use pattern simulation results for 2020 and pattern prediction for 2040. (Actual pattern in 2020: spatial distribution pattern of actual land use in 2020; simulated pattern in 2020, and simulated pattern in 2040: spatial distribution pattern of simulated land use in 2020 and 2040.)

Close modal

Performance of CMIP6

Through downscaling and bias correction, an integrated evaluation of the simulation performance of nine CMIP6 models was conducted with respect to meteorological factors, such as precipitation and mean temperature in the SRYR (as depicted in Figure 10). Among the nine models, IPSL-CM6A-LR demonstrated the most satisfactory simulation performance for precipitation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.86, while CanESM5 displayed a more conventional outcome for precipitation, with a correlation coefficient of 0.71. Their overall performance was consistent with the average temperature. Furthermore, the MME was found to be the most effective approach for precipitation and average temperature in all models. This study utilized the MME of CMIP6 as the model input to minimize errors.
Figure 10

Taylor plots of simulated and observed values of nine CMIP6 models and MME for (a) precipitation and (b) average temperature in the SRYR.

Figure 10

Taylor plots of simulated and observed values of nine CMIP6 models and MME for (a) precipitation and (b) average temperature in the SRYR.

Close modal

Projection of future baseflow and BFI by MME

Our study used CMIP6 downscaling data and 2040 land use simulation data as inputs to drive the SWAT model. Based on the SWAT model output and baseflow separation approaches, the baseflow and BFI from 2015 to 2100 were projected, meanwhile the baseflow changes in the three periods relative to the baseline period were quantitatively described (Figure 11). All baseflow exhibit a significant upward trend under ssp126, ssp245, and ssp370. However, it shows an insignificant upward trend under ssp585 (Table 5). The lowest values in the recent and intermediate periods are 418 and 500.8 m3/s under ssp585 and ssp245, respectively, and the highest values are 857.8 and 1,037 m3/s under ssp126 and ssp245, respectively. The baseflow presents a minimum of 595 m3/s under ssp126 and a maximum of 972.7 m3/s under ssp245 (Figure 11(a)) in the final period. The change rates of baseflow are higher under ssp126 and ssp245 than under the other scenarios (Figure 11(c)). The maximum change rate of baseflow occurs in the final period in ssp245. In contrast, BFI does not show obvious fluctuation characteristics (Figure 11(b)); the values from largest to smallest are found under ssp370, ssp245, ssp126, and ssp585.
Table 5

Trend analysis of baseflow under different scenarios from 2015 to 2100 in the SRYR

Scenario modelDate rangeβ|Z|Trend
ssp126 2015–2100 1.9084 4.54 S + 
ssp245 2015–2100 2.933 7.167 S + 
ssp370 2015–2100 3.0268 7.841 S + 
ssp585 2015–2100 3.1003 1.567 In + 
Scenario modelDate rangeβ|Z|Trend
ssp126 2015–2100 1.9084 4.54 S + 
ssp245 2015–2100 2.933 7.167 S + 
ssp370 2015–2100 3.0268 7.841 S + 
ssp585 2015–2100 3.1003 1.567 In + 
Figure 11

Annual trends in (a) baseflow, (b) BFI, and (c) change rate of baseflow in the three periods relative to baseline.

Figure 11

Annual trends in (a) baseflow, (b) BFI, and (c) change rate of baseflow in the three periods relative to baseline.

Close modal
The spatial distributions of annual baseflow and BFI for the SRYR under the different scenarios are presented in Figure 12. Spatially, the baseflow increases gradually from northwest to southeast. Under all scenarios, the maximum baseflow values are primarily concentrated in the downstream region of the Tongtian River; however, values under ssp126 and ssp245 are greater than those under ssp370 and ssp585. Under all scenarios, the Tongtian River exhibits the highest BFI, followed by the Dangqu River, the Tuotuo River, and the Chumaer River. In comparison, the BFI values of the Dangqu River, the Tuotuo River, and the Chumaer River under ssp370 and ssp585 are lower than those under ssp126 and ssp245.
Figure 12

Spatial variations in (a–d) baseflow and (e–h) BFI under different scenarios.

Figure 12

Spatial variations in (a–d) baseflow and (e–h) BFI under different scenarios.

Close modal

Characteristics of future baseflow evolution

This study sought to project the future distribution of baseflow and BFI in the SRYR under four different ssp scenarios, which were based on nine CMIP6 models and 2040 land use simulation data. The prediction results suggested that mean precipitation and temperature can be expected to increase in the SRYR in the future (Figure 13), which is in accordance with the results of Pepin et al. (2015). Across the four scenarios, baseflow generally displayed a significant increasing trend, except for ssp585, where the trend was not statistically significant. The increase in baseflow under ssp126, ssp245, and ssp370 is likely due to the continuous increase in precipitation (Figure 13(a)). However, the lack of a significant trend in baseflow under ssp585 can be attributed to the more pronounced warming trend in this scenario, which leads to a larger amount of evapotranspiration. The analysis of historical and future baseflow characteristics revealed significant spatiotemporal variations in the SRYR. The BFI values of the Chumaer and Tuotuo river basins under the regional competition pathway (ssp3) and the traditional fossil fuel pathway (ssp5) were lower than those under the sustainability pathway (ssp1) and the intermediate pathway (ssp2). These findings demonstrated that climate change had a substantial influence on the spatiotemporal variations of baseflow and BFI in the SRYR.
Figure 13

Annual trends in (a) precipitation and (b) mean temperature, and change rate of (c) precipitation and (d) mean temperature in the three periods relative to baseline.

Figure 13

Annual trends in (a) precipitation and (b) mean temperature, and change rate of (c) precipitation and (d) mean temperature in the three periods relative to baseline.

Close modal

Driving forces of baseflow change

The baseflow exhibited a persistent upward trend throughout both historical and future periods. This rise in baseflow is likely attributable to the increasing precipitation and warming. Our findings indicate that the spatiotemporal characteristics of baseflow were similar to those of precipitation and temperature, as depicted in Figure 14. Furthermore, there were significant positive correlations between baseflow and both precipitation and mean temperature, with correlation coefficients of 0.79 and 0.41, respectively, as illustrated in Figure 15(a). Precipitation plays a critical role in influencing baseflow by providing the necessary water availability (Ahiablame et al. 2017). As precipitation levels increase, a greater amount of water percolates through the soil and recharges groundwater, which ultimately results in increased baseflow contributions to streams and rivers. The impact of temperature on hydrological processes in cold alpine regions is well established (Ayers et al. 2021). The strong positive correlation between baseflow and temperature may be linked to the melting of permafrost due to temperature rise, which subsequently contributes to the water cycle (Yi et al. 2021). Additionally, warming-induced thawing of permafrost may facilitate deeper flow paths and enhance infiltration (Walvoord & Striegl 2007), leading to an increase in baseflow.
Figure 14

Geographic distribution of average precipitation (PCP), mean temperature (TMP), and evaporation (ET) for 2015–2100 under four socioeconomic scenarios.

Figure 14

Geographic distribution of average precipitation (PCP), mean temperature (TMP), and evaporation (ET) for 2015–2100 under four socioeconomic scenarios.

Close modal
Figure 15

Correlation analysis of baseflow and BFI with (a) meteorological factors and (b) LUCC.

Figure 15

Correlation analysis of baseflow and BFI with (a) meteorological factors and (b) LUCC.

Close modal

In addition, the baseflow and BFI exhibit a robust spatial correlation with LUCC. As demonstrated in Figure 15(b), the correlation coefficients between baseflow and grassland and water are 0.83 and 0.95, respectively, while those of BFI are 0.72 and 0.69, indicating that LUCC significantly influences baseflow change. Our findings revealed that higher baseflow and BFI values were observed in the upstream region of the Dangqu River. The Chadan Wetland, the largest peat wetland in the SRYR, is situated in the upstream portion of the Dangqu River. Wetlands serve as natural storage reservoirs for groundwater (Erwin 2009), which could potentially contribute to the observed higher baseflow and BFI values in the region. The land use type also exhibits a significant influence on the spatial characteristics of baseflow and BFI. The highest BFI occurred in the Tongtian River because of its good vegetation coverage, which reached a grassland coverage of 89%. The lowest BFI values throughout the SRYR occurred for the Chumaer River. This area is mainly covered by bare land, with a coverage of 48%. Moreover, the compacted or exposed soils in the upper Chumaer River can limit the infiltration capacity of water into the ground (Owuor et al. 2016). Overall, the spatiotemporal distributions of baseflow and BFI in the SRYR were impacted by a variety of factors, such as precipitation, temperature, human activities, vegetation coverage, and terrain.

Uncertainties and limitations

Undoubtedly, the prediction of meteorological factors is largely uncertain due to limitations in climate models (Thomas et al. 2023). To address this, bias correction and the MME method are commonly used to reduce uncertainty in CMIP6 model data. In our study, the QM and MME techniques effectively decreased the uncertainty of the CMIP6 model's downscaling data at each meteorological station. However, the downscaling and bias correction methods employed in this research were statistical in nature and did not consider the impact of spatial factors on climate models. Future studies should be conducted to further explore alternative spatial dynamic downscaling methods to overcome this limitation. Moreover, the FLUS model utilized only nine driving forces to estimate land use patterns in 2040, neglecting snow cover and frozen soil, which introduced uncertainty into the simulation results. Although the simulation accuracy in this study was high, it did not account for the influences of glaciers and permafrost, which also contributed to the uncertainty. Although the SWAT model demonstrated strong simulation accuracy, it similarly failed to consider the impact of glaciers and frozen soil, leading to uncertain results. To enhance model adaptability and improve land use predictions, future research should incorporate additional driving factors and apply multiple hydrological models for comparative analysis.

Our study proposes a coupled framework, which combines the SWAT model with CMIP6, FLUS, and two-parameter digital filtering to evaluate the spatiotemporal evolution and response mechanism of baseflow in the SRYR. The principal conclusions are as follows.

  • (1) The changes in land use patterns were minimal before 2000, and the main change, particularly the transition from bare land to grassland in the mid-lower reaches of the Tongtian River and the transition from grassland to bare land in the upper reaches of the Tuotuo River, occurred from 2000 to 2010.

  • (2) Temporally, baseflow exhibits a significant upward trend under ssp126, ssp245, and ssp370 from 2015 to 2100, and in contrast, an insignificant upward trend occurred under ssp585. Baseflow exhibits a unimodal intra-annual distribution pattern, and BFI presents a bimodal distribution pattern.

  • (3) Spatially, baseflow increases gradually from northwest to southeast. Under all scenarios, the maximum baseflow values principally occurred in the downstream region of the Tongtian River. Baseflow values under ssp126 and ssp245 are greater than those under ssp370 and ssp585. Under all scenarios, the Tongtian River exhibited the highest BFI, followed by the Dangqu, Tuotuo, and Chumaer rivers. In comparison, the BFI values of the Dangqu River and the Tuotuo River under ssp370 and ssp585 are lower than those under ssp126 and ssp245.

  • (4) The spatiotemporal distributions of baseflow and BFI are impacted simultaneously by a variety of factors, such as precipitation, temperature, human activities, vegetation coverage, and terrain.

In summary, our findings provide important insight for the analysis of spatiotemporal evolution and the driving mechanisms of water resources in the SRYR, and can also serve as a guide for similar studies in other watersheds.

Conceptualization, methodology, and software: H.R., L.S., G.W., and W.T.; formal analysis, validation, and investigation: H.R. and L.S.; resources and data curation: H.R., X.Y., F.N., M.W., and M.Z.; writing – original draft preparation: H.R.; writing – review and editing: W.T., F.N., M.Z., and N.J.; visualization: H.R. and N.J.; supervision: L.S.; project administration and funding acquisition: G.W. and H.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Programs of China (2022YFC3201700), the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Public Welfare Research Institutes (CKSF20241012/SZ), the Major Science and Technology Projects of the Ministry of Water Resources in 2022 (SKS-202239), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52009006).

Data cannot be made publicly available; readers should contact the corresponding author for details.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Adnan
M.
,
Liu
S.
,
Saifullah
M.
,
Iqbal
M.
,
Ali
A. F.
&
Mukhtar
M. A.
(
2022
)
Spatiotemporal variations in runoff and runoff components in response to climate change in a glacierized subbasin of the Upper Indus Basin, Pakistan
,
Frontiers in Earth Science
,
10
,
970349
.
https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2022.970349
.
Ahiablame
L.
,
Sheshukov
A. Y.
,
Rahmani
V.
&
Moriasi
D.
(
2017
)
Annual baseflow variations as influenced by climate variability and agricultural land use change in the Missouri River Basin
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
551
,
188
202
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.05.055
.
Ahmed
N.
,
Wang
G.
,
Booij
M. J.
,
Oluwafemi
A.
,
Hashmi
M. Z.
,
Ali
S.
&
Munir
S.
(
2020a
)
Climatic variability and periodicity for upstream sub-basins of the Yangtze River, China
,
Water
,
12
,
842
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w12030842
.
Ahmed
N.
,
Wang
G.
,
Oluwafemi
A.
,
Munir
S.
,
Hu
Z.
,
Shakoor
A.
&
Imran
M. A.
(
2020b
)
Temperature trends and elevation dependent warming during 1965–2014 in headwaters of Yangtze River, Qinghai Tibetan Plateau
,
Journal of Mountain Science
,
17
,
556
571
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11629-019-5438-3
.
Ahmed
N.
,
Wang
G.
,
H.
,
Booij
M. J.
,
Marhaento
H.
,
Prodhan
F. A.
,
Ali
S.
&
Ali Imran
M.
(
2022
)
Attribution of changes in streamflow to climate change and land cover change in Yangtze River source region, China
,
Water
,
14
,
259
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/w14020259
.
Ayers
J. R.
,
Villarini
G.
,
Schilling
K.
&
Jones
C.
(
2021
)
On the statistical attribution of changes in monthly baseflow across the US Midwest
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
592
,
125551
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125551
.
Biswas
S.
&
Biswas
S.
(
2024
)
Estimation of monthly snowmelt contribution to runoff using gridded meteorological data in SWAT model for upper Alaknanda River basin, India
,
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
,
196
,
86
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-023-12236-z
.
Chen
S.
,
Fu
Y. H.
,
Wu
Z.
,
Hao
F.
,
Hao
Z.
,
Guo
Y.
,
Geng
X.
,
Li
X.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Tang
J.
,
Singh
V. P.
&
Zhang
X.
(
2023
)
Informing the SWAT model with remote sensing detected vegetation phenology for improved modeling of ecohydrological processes
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
616
,
128817
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128817
.
Cui
T.
,
Li
Y.
,
Yang
L.
,
Nan
Y.
,
Li
K.
,
Tudaji
M.
,
Hu
H.
,
Long
D.
,
Shahid
M.
,
Mubeen
A.
,
He
Z.
,
Yong
B.
,
Lu
H.
,
Li
C.
,
Ni
G.
,
Hu
C.
&
Tian
F.
(
2023
)
Non-monotonic changes in Asian Water Towers’ streamflow at increasing warming levels
,
Nature Communications
,
14
,
1176
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-36804-6
.
Da Silva
R. M.
,
Santos
C. A. G.
,
Moreira
M.
,
Corte-Real
J.
,
Silva
V. C. L.
&
Medeiros
I. C.
(
2015
)
Rainfall and river flow trends using Mann–Kendall and Sen's slope estimator statistical tests in the Cobres River basin
,
Natural Hazards
,
77
,
1205
1221
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1644-7
.
Da Silva Cruz
J.
,
Blanco
C. J. C.
&
De Oliveira Júnior
J. F.
(
2022
)
Modeling of land use and land cover change dynamics for future projection of the Amazon number curve
,
Science of The Total Environment
,
811
,
152348
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152348
.
Dinh
T. L. A.
&
Aires
F.
(
2023
)
Revisiting the bias correction of climate models for impact studies
,
Climatic Change
,
176
,
140
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-023-03597-y
.
Eckhardt
K.
(
2008
)
A comparison of baseflow indices, which were calculated with seven different baseflow separation methods
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
352
,
168
173
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.01.005
.
Erwin
K. L.
(
2009
)
Wetlands and global climate change: the role of wetland restoration in a changing world
,
Wetlands Ecology & Management
,
17
,
71
84
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11273-008-9119-1
.
Eyring
V.
,
Bony
S.
,
Meehl
G. A.
,
Senior
C. A.
,
Stevens
B.
,
Stouffer
R. J.
&
Taylor
K. E.
(
2016
)
Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization
,
Geoscientific Model Development
,
9
,
1937
1958
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-1937-2016
.
Fahad
M. G. R.
,
Saiful Islam
A. K. M.
,
Nazari
R.
,
Alfi Hasan
M.
,
Tarekul Islam
G. M.
&
Bala
S. K.
(
2018
)
Regional changes of precipitation and temperature over Bangladesh using bias-corrected multi-model ensemble projections considering high-emission pathways
,
International Journal of Climatology
,
38
,
1634
1648
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.5284
.
Farris
S.
,
Deidda
R.
,
Viola
F.
&
Mascaro
G.
(
2021
)
On the role of serial correlation and field significance in detecting changes in extreme precipitation frequency
,
Water Resources Research
,
57
,
e2021WR030172
.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2021WR030172
.
Ficklin
D. L.
,
Robeson
S. M.
&
Knouft
J. H.
(
2016
)
Impacts of recent climate change on trends in baseflow and stormflow in United States watersheds
,
Geophysical Research Letters
,
43
,
5079
5088
.
https://doi.org/10.1002/2016GL069121
.
Gao
H.
,
Qin
T.
,
Luan
Q.
,
Feng
J.
,
Zhang
X.
,
Yang
Y.
,
Xu
S.
&
Lu
J.
(
2024
)
Characteristics analysis and prediction of land use evolution in the source region of the Yangtze River and Yellow River based on improved FLUS model
,
Land
,
13
,
393
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/land13030393
.
Guo
H.
,
Zhan
C.
,
Ning
L.
,
Li
Z.
&
Hu
S.
(
2022
)
Evaluation and comparison of CMIP6 and CMIP5 model performance in simulating the runoff
,
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
,
149
,
1451
1470
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-022-04118-0
.
Guo
X.
,
Feng
Q.
,
Yin
Z.
,
Si
J.
,
Xi
H.
&
Zhao
Y.
(
2022
)
Critical role of groundwater discharge in sustaining streamflow in a glaciated alpine watershed, northeastern Tibetan Plateau
,
Science of The Total Environment
,
822
,
153578
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153578
.
Güven
A.
,
Gün
M. V.
&
Pala
A.
(
2024
)
Modeling and future projection of streamflow and sediment yield in a sub-basin of Euphrates River under the effect of climate change
,
Journal of Water and Climate Change
,
15
,
2628
2647
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.612
.
Hu
S.
,
Yang
D.
,
Wu
J.
,
Gao
Y.
,
Qiu
H.
,
Cao
M.
,
Song
J.
&
Wan
H.
(
2017
)
Spatiotemporal variation characteristics of baseflow in the Bahe River Basin based on digital filter method and SWAT model
,
Scientia Geographica Sinica
,
37
,
455
463
.
https://doi.org/10.13249/j.cnki.sgs.2017.03.016
.
Huang
S.
,
Dong
Q.
,
Zhang
X.
&
Deng
W.
(
2021
)
Catchment natural driving factors and prediction of baseflow index for Continental United States based on Random Forest technique
,
Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment
,
35
,
2567
2581
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00477-021-02057-2
.
Jian
S.
,
Pei
Y.
,
Zhu
T.
&
Yu
X.
(
2023
)
Spatiotemporal change and attribution analysis of future runoff on the Yellow River basin of China
,
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
,
49
,
101494
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101494
.
Kang
W.
,
Ni
F.
,
Deng
Y.
,
Xiang
J.
,
Zhou
J.
,
Du
Z.
,
Wu
M.
,
Jiang
N.
&
Yue
Z.
(
2023
)
Spatiotemporal dynamics of blue and green water resources in a mountainous watershed: a case study of the Wujiang River Basin, China
,
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
,
48
,
101484
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2023.101484
.
Li
G.
&
Fan
L.
(
2023
)
Comparative analysis of base flow segmentation methods and characteristics of base flow in the source area of the Yangtze River
,
Journal of Yangtze River Scientific Research Institute
,
40
(
4
),
185
190
https://doi.org/10.11988/ckyyb.20220328.
Li
L.
,
Yun
Z.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Zhao
W.
,
Kang
Y.
&
Gao
R.
(
2024
)
Improving categorical and continuous accuracy of precipitation forecasts by integrating Empirical Quantile Mapping and Bernoulli-Gamma-Gaussian distribution
,
Atmospheric Research
,
298
,
107133
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosres.2023.107133
.
Liu
X.
,
Liang
X.
,
Li
X.
,
Xu
X.
,
Ou
J.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Li
S.
,
Wang
S.
&
Pei
F.
(
2017
)
A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects
,
Landscape and Urban Planning
,
168
,
94
116
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.019
.
Luo
K.
(
2021
)
Response of hydrological systems to the intensity of ecological engineering
,
Journal of Environmental Management
,
296
,
113173
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113173
.
Mao
B.
,
Wang
X.
,
Jia
S.
&
Liu
Z.
(
2024
)
Multi-methods to investigate the baseflow: insight from watershed scale spatiotemporal variety perspective
,
Ecological Indicators
,
158
,
111573
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111573
.
Meinshausen
M.
,
Vogel
E.
,
Nauels
A.
,
Lorbacher
K.
,
Meinshausen
N.
,
Etheridge
D. M.
,
Fraser
P. J.
,
Montzka
S. A.
,
Rayner
P. J.
,
Trudinger
C. M.
,
Krummel
P. B.
,
Beyerle
U.
,
Canadell
J. G.
,
Daniel
J. S.
,
Enting
I. G.
,
Law
R. M.
,
Lunder
C. R.
,
O'Doherty
S.
,
Prinn
R. G.
,
Reimann
S.
,
Rubino
M.
,
Velders
G. J. M.
,
Vollmer
M. K.
,
Wang
R. H. J.
&
Weiss
R.
(
2017
)
Historical greenhouse gas concentrations for climate modelling (CMIP6)
,
Geoscientific Model Development
,
10
,
2057
2116
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-10-2057-2017
.
O'Neill
B. C.
,
Tebaldi
C.
,
van Vuuren
D. P.
,
Eyring
V.
,
Friedlingstein
P.
,
Hurtt
G.
,
Knutti
R.
,
Kriegler
E.
,
Lamarque
J.-F.
,
Lowe
J.
,
Meehl
G. A.
,
Moss
R.
,
Riahi
K.
&
Sanderson
B. M.
(
2016
)
The Scenario Model Intercomparison Project (ScenarioMIP) for CMIP6
,
Geoscientific Model Development
,
9
,
3461
3482
.
https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-9-3461-2016
.
Owuor
S. O.
,
Butterbach-Bahl
K.
,
Guzha
A. C.
,
Rufino
M. C.
,
Pelster
D. E.
,
Díaz-Pinés
E.
&
Breuer
L.
(
2016
)
Groundwater recharge rates and surface runoff response to land use and land cover changes in semi-arid environments
,
Ecological Processes
,
5
,
16
.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-016-0060-6
.
Pepin
N.
,
Bradley
R. S.
,
Diaz
H. F.
,
Baraer
M.
,
Caceres
E. B.
,
Forsythe
N.
,
Fowler
H.
,
Greenwood
G.
,
Hashmi
M. Z.
,
Liu
X. D.
,
Miller
J. R.
,
Ning
L.
,
Ohmura
A.
,
Palazzi
E.
,
Rangwala
I.
,
Schöner
W.
,
Severskiy
I.
,
Shahgedanova
M.
,
Wang
M. B.
,
Williamson
S. N.
&
Yang
D. Q.
(
2015
)
Elevation-dependent warming in mountain regions of the world
,
Nature Climate Change
,
5
,
424
430
.
https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2563
.
Qiao
X.
,
Li
Z.
,
Lin
J.
,
Wang
H.
,
Zheng
S.
&
Yang
S.
(
2024
)
Assessing current and future soil erosion under changing land use based on InVEST and FLUS models in the Yihe River Basin, North China
,
International Soil and Water Conservation Research
,
12
,
298
312
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iswcr.2023.07.001
.
Qin
J.
,
Yang
B.
,
Ding
Y.
,
Cui
J.
&
Zhang
Y.
(
2025
)
Assessment of runoff generation capacity and total runoff contribution for different landscapes in alpine and permafrost watershed
,
CATENA
,
249
,
108643
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2024.108643
.
Rounce
D. R.
,
Hock
R.
,
Maussion
F.
,
Hugonnet
R.
,
Kochtitzky
W.
,
Huss
M.
,
Berthier
E.
,
Brinkerhoff
D.
,
Compagno
L.
,
Copland
L.
,
Farinotti
D.
,
Menounos
B.
&
McNabb
R.
(
2023
)
Global glacier change in the 21st century: every increase in temperature matters
,
Science
,
379
,
78
83
.
https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abo1324
.
Rumsey
C. A.
,
Miller
M. P.
,
Susong
D. D.
,
Tillman
F. D.
&
Anning
D. W.
(
2015
)
Regional scale estimates of baseflow and factors influencing baseflow in the Upper Colorado River Basin
,
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
,
4
(Part B),
91
107
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2015.04.008
.
Schoof
J. T.
,
Pryor
S. C.
&
Ford
T. W.
(
2019
)
Projected changes in United States regional extreme heat days derived from bivariate quantile mapping of CMIP5 simulations
,
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
,
124
,
5214
5232
.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029599
.
Shao
J.
,
Xiong
Y.
,
Bu
H.
&
Wang
Z.
(
2022
)
Base flow variation in the source region of the Yangtze River and its meteorological influencing factors
,
Yangtze River
,
53
(
11
),
61
65 + 71
.
https://doi.org/10.16232/j.cnki.1001-4179.2022.11.010
.
Shukla
S.
,
Jain
S. K.
&
Kansal
M. L.
(
2021
)
Hydrological modelling of a snow/glacier-fed western Himalayan basin to simulate the current and future streamflows under changing climate scenarios
,
Science of The Total Environment
,
795
,
148871
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.148871
.
Sun
J.
,
Wang
X.
,
Shahid
S.
&
Li
H.
(
2021
)
An optimized baseflow separation method for assessment of seasonal and spatial variability of baseflow and the driving factors
,
Journal of Geographical Sciences
,
31
,
1873
1894
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-021-1927-8
.
Taylor
K. E.
(
2001
)
Summarizing multiple aspects of model performance in a single diagram
,
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
,
106
,
7183
7192
.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2000JD900719
.
Thomas
B.
,
Costoya
X.
,
deCastro
M.
,
Insua-Costa
D.
,
Senande-Rivera
M.
&
Gómez-Gesteira
M.
(
2023
)
Downscaling CMIP6 climate projections to classify the future offshore wind energy resource in the Spanish territorial waters
,
Journal of Cleaner Production
,
433
,
139860
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.139860
.
Walvoord
M. A.
&
Striegl
R. G.
(
2007
)
Increased groundwater to stream discharge from permafrost thawing in the Yukon River basin: potential impacts on lateral export of carbon and nitrogen
,
Geophysical Research Letters
,
34
,
L12402
.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2007GL030216
.
Wang
H.
,
Yuan
W.
,
Ma
Y.
,
Ye
H.
,
Li
Y.
,
Bai
X.
,
Cheng
S.
&
Guo
W.
(
2024
)
Evaluating the impact of various driving factors on future water supply and demands
,
Journal of Water and Climate Change
,
15
,
3293
3311
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wcc.2024.137
.
Waterman
B. R.
,
Alcantar
G.
,
Thomas
S. G.
&
Kirk
M. F.
(
2022
)
Spatiotemporal variation in runoff and baseflow in watersheds located across a regional precipitation gradient
,
Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies
,
41
,
101071
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2022.101071
.
Wu
J.
,
Miao
C.
,
Duan
Q.
,
Lei
X.
,
Li
X.
&
Li
H.
(
2019
)
Dynamics and attributions of baseflow in the semiarid Loess Plateau
,
Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
,
124
,
3684
3701
.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2018JD029775
.
Wu
Y.
,
Fang
H.
,
He
G.
,
Huang
L.
&
Wang
J.
(
2021
)
Climate-driven changes in hydrological and hydrodynamic responses in the Yarlung Tsangpo River
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
598
,
126267
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126267
.
Wu
G.
,
Zhang
J.
,
Li
Y.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Ren
H.
&
Yang
M.
(
2024
)
Revealing temporal variation of baseflow and its underlying causes in the source region of the Yangtze River (China)
,
Hydrology Research
,
55
,
392
411
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/nh.2024.185
.
Xu
X.
,
Dong
L.
,
Zhao
Y.
&
Wang
Y.
(
2019
)
Effect of the Asian Water Tower over the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau and the characteristics of atmospheric water circulation
,
Chinese Science Bulletin
,
64
,
2830
2841
.
https://doi.org/10.1360/TB-2019-0203
.
Xue
P.
,
Zhang
C.
,
Wen
Z.
,
Park
E.
&
Jakada
H.
(
2022
)
Climate variability impacts on runoff projection under quantile mapping bias correction in the support CMIP6: an investigation in Lushi basin of China
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
614
,
128550
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128550
.
Yi
W.
,
Feng
Y.
,
Liang
S.
,
Kuang
X.
,
Yan
D.
&
Wan
L.
(
2021
)
Increasing annual streamflow and groundwater storage in response to climate warming in the Yangtze River source region
,
Environmental Research Letters
,
16
,
084011
.
https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ac0f27
.
Yu
G.
,
Liu
L.
,
Li
Z.
,
Li
Y.
,
Huang
H.
,
Brierley
G.
,
Blue
B.
,
Wang
Z.
&
Pan
B.
(
2013
)
Fluvial diversity in relation to valley setting in the source region of the Yangtze and Yellow rivers
,
Journal of Geographical Sciences
,
23
,
817
832
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-013-1046-2
.
Yuan
J.
,
Xu
Y.
,
Wu
L.
,
Wang
J.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Xu
Y.
&
Dai
X.
(
2019
)
Variability of precipitation extremes over the Yangtze River Delta, eastern China, during 1960–2016
,
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
,
138
,
305
319
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-02829-5
.
Yuan
Z.
,
Xu
J.
&
Wang
Y.
(
2019
)
Historical and future changes of blue water and green water resources in the Yangtze River source region, China
,
Theoretical and Applied Climatology
,
138
,
1035
1047
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00704-019-02883-z
.
Zeng
F.
,
He
Q.
,
Li
Y.
,
Shi
W.
,
Yang
R.
,
Ma
M.
,
Huang
G.
,
Xiao
J.
,
Yang
X.
&
Di
D.
(
2024
)
Reduced runoff in the upper Yangtze River due to comparable contribution of anthropogenic and climate changes
,
Earth's Future
,
12
,
e2023EF004028
.
https://doi.org/10.1029/2023EF004028
.
Zhang
Q.
,
Liu
J.
,
Singh
V. P.
,
Shi
P.
&
Sun
P.
(
2017
)
Hydrological responses to climatic changes in the Yellow River basin, China: climatic elasticity and streamflow prediction
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
554
,
635
645
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.09.040
.
Zhao
H.
,
Li
H.
,
Xuan
Y.
,
Li
C.
&
Ni
H.
(
2022
)
Improvement of the SWAT model for snowmelt runoff simulation in seasonal snowmelt area using remote sensing data
,
Remote Sensing
,
14
,
5823
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14225823
.
Zhu
K.
,
Qiu
X.
,
Luo
Y.
,
Dai
M.
,
Lu
X.
,
Zang
C.
,
Zhang
W.
,
Gan
X.
&
Zhula
W.
(
2022
)
Spatial and temporal dynamics of water resources in typical ecosystems of the Dongjiang River Basin, China
,
Journal of Hydrology
,
614
,
128617
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2022.128617
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Supplementary data