We examine factors that explain consumer spending on tap water substitutes using information from a national survey undertaken with a representative set of Canadian respondents. We develop a model to predict the percentage of households that undertake such spending for the purpose of reducing perceived health risks from tap water consumption. Using results from the model we estimate the magnitude of defensive expenditures to be over half a billion dollars (2010 US$) per year for Canada, as a whole. This is equivalent to approximately $48 per household per year or about $19 per person per year. Residents of Ontario, the province in which an Escherichia coli incident took place in 2000, have the highest willingness-to-pay of approximately $60 per household per year.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
October 28 2011
Defensive spending on tap water substitutes: the value of reducing perceived health risks
Diane P. Dupont;
1Department of Economics, Brock University, 500 Glenridge Avenue, St. Catharines, Ontario, L2S 3A1, Canada
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Nowshin Jahan
Nowshin Jahan
2Business Planning and Financial Management Branch, Ontario Ministry of Government Services and Master of Business Economics graduate, Brock University, Canada
Search for other works by this author on:
J Water Health (2012) 10 (1): 56–68.
Article history
Received:
June 10 2011
Accepted:
October 04 2011
Citation
Diane P. Dupont, Nowshin Jahan; Defensive spending on tap water substitutes: the value of reducing perceived health risks. J Water Health 1 March 2012; 10 (1): 56–68. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2011.097
Download citation file: