A wastewater treatment and reclamation facility in north-east Spain was monitored over 1 year to determine the occurrence and concentrations of different microbial indicators (Escherichia coli, fecal enterococci, somatic bacteriophages and spores of sulfite-reducing clostridia). The removal of the indicators and its relationships through the wastewater treatment and reclamation trains were evaluated. The results obtained show that the reclamation treatments evaluated present a different efficiency in indicator microorganisms' removal depending on the type of microorganism. The E. coli and enterococci present an average reduction slightly higher than the other indicators, followed by somatic bacteriophages and spores of sulfite-reducing clostridia. The Spearman's correlations indicate that it is not suitable to use any of the bacterial indicators evaluated to predict the content of virus or spores of sulfite-reducing clostridia. Therefore, in order to evaluate the microbiological risk of the reclaimed effluent use, it is necessary to monitor the three types of indicator microorganisms (bacteria, virus and protozoa).
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
October 09 2012
Removal and relationships of microbial indicators in a water treatment and reclamation facility
Laura Alcalde;
1Soil Science Laboratory, University of Barcelona, Avda. Joan XXIII s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Montserrat Folch;
Montserrat Folch
1Soil Science Laboratory, University of Barcelona, Avda. Joan XXIII s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
Josefina C. Tapias
Josefina C. Tapias
1Soil Science Laboratory, University of Barcelona, Avda. Joan XXIII s/n, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
Search for other works by this author on:
J Water Health (2012) 10 (4): 549–556.
Article history
Received:
November 22 2011
Accepted:
August 14 2012
Citation
Laura Alcalde, Montserrat Folch, Josefina C. Tapias; Removal and relationships of microbial indicators in a water treatment and reclamation facility. J Water Health 1 December 2012; 10 (4): 549–556. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2012.213
Download citation file: