The Buriganga River plays a key role in the socioeconomic structure of Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh. However, this river is severely polluted and is considered one of the most polluted in the world. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the concentrations of various metals in the Buriganga River. A study was conducted from August 2019 to February 2020 to determine the concentrations of 16 metals in water samples (n = 210) collected from 10 distinct sites in the Buriganga River. The mean values for the concentrations of Cr, Mn, Ni, Zn, As, Se, Cd, Sb, and Pb in river water were above the guideline values prescribed by the WHO, Japan, and Bangladesh. Moreover, the fraction ratios of Be, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Se, Mo, Ag, Cd, Sb, and Pb were high (>0.85); consequently, these metals could accumulate at high concentrations in river sediments. Assessment using the single-factor pollution index allowed the classification of the pollution level as ‘serious pollution’ for Sb and ‘heavy pollution’ for Cd, Ni, and Pb. The trace metal concentrations in this river imply that crops cultivated along the river using river water may also be contaminated with trace metals.

  • The highest concentrations of Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Zn, As, Se, Mo, Cd, Sb, and Pb were above the guideline values.

  • High fraction ratio values of Be, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Se, Mo, Ag, Cd, Sb, and Pb indicated that these metals were distributed on suspended solids.

  • A single-factor pollution index showed that the Buriganga River was heavily polluted by Sb, Cd, Ni, and Pb.

  • Mn showed relatively high concentrations in the dry season.

Pollution of river environments by trace metals, which are highly toxic and persistent, is attracting global attention (Varol 2011; Yuan et al. 2011; Fu et al. 2014; Islam et al. 2015). Trace metals are a primary environmental concern because they are non-biodegradable and toxic and have a cumulative effect (Briffa et al. 2020). Trace metals deposited in the sediment can also be re-mixed into the water column via suspension, desorption, oxidation, or reduction processes, posing an increased risk to aquatic organisms, animals, and humans (Dong et al. 2012; Zhao et al. 2013). With the intensification of industrialization in many countries, numerous reports on trace metal contamination of river environments owing to industrial effluent discharge have emerged, raising concerns regarding the adverse effects of trace metal exposure on human health and ecosystems (Li & Zhang 2010; Islam et al. 2014b). The International Agency for Research on Cancer categorizes the metals As, Pb, and Ni as group 1 (‘carcinogenic to humans’), 2B (‘possibly carcinogenic to humans’), and 3 (‘not classifiable as to its carcinogenicity to humans’), respectively (World Health Organization 2023). Furthermore, adverse health effects, such as hypertension (As), diabetes (Cd), reproductive toxicity (Pb, Ni), dopamine oxidation (Mn), metabolic function effects (Cu), and respiratory problems (Zn), have been reported in humans who accidentally ingest trace metals (Uddin & Jeong 2021).

The Buriganga River is considered one of the most polluted rivers in the world. Anthropogenic activities have been reported as the primary source of trace metal contamination in this river, which flows southwest of Dhaka City, the capital of Bangladesh (Islam et al. 2014a; Nargis et al. 2021), with huge volumes of toxic waste discharged from thousands of industrial units and sewage lines being the primary pollutants (Islam et al. 2006; Kawser Ahmed et al. 2016). Hospital waste, boat and launch repairs, galvanizing steel, motor repairs, rechargeable batteries, foundry products, metal ceramics, textiles, dyeing, and leather industries, municipal sewage sludge, fertilizers, pesticides, insecticides, and oil emissions are also pollutant sources (Islam et al. 2015; Raknuzzaman et al. 2016). These deleterious effluents, including chromium, lead, sulfur, ammonium, salt, and other materials, severely pollute the Buriganga River (Hoque et al. 2016) and can seriously impact human health. The residents of Dhaka use this river daily as a water transportation route and for ablutions. Furthermore, oral exposure of humans to contaminants from ingesting crops cultivated using the river water is of particular concern, as the Buriganga River is utilized as a source of water for agricultural purposes (Islam et al. 2014a; Bhuyan et al. 2017). Therefore, a comprehensive study of the contamination levels of trace metals in this river is important for protecting the health of the residents of Dhaka.

This study aimed to assess the risk posed by trace metal contamination in the Buriganga River, Bangladesh. We collected water samples at 10 sites along the Buriganga River from August 2019 to February 2020. Trace metal concentrations, fraction ratios between dissolved and particulate phases, and single-factor pollution index values were determined to evaluate the level of metal contamination in the Buriganga River.

Chemicals

Standard solutions for Be, B, V, Cr, Mn, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Y, Mo, Ag, Cd, In, Sb, Pb, and Bi were obtained from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Industries (Osaka, Japan). Y, In, and Bi were used as internal standards. Inductively coupled plasma (ICP) analysis grade nitric acid, ultra-trace analysis grade HF, and poisonous grade HClO4 were purchased from FUJIFILM Wako Pure Chemical Ind. Ultrapure water (18.2 MΩ cm) was used to dilute nitric acid.

Sampling sites: Buriganga River

Water samples (n = 210) were collected from 10 sampling sites on the Buriganga River (Figure 1), Dhaka, Bangladesh from August 2019 to February 2020. These sites were investigated to evaluate the pollution status of the Briganga River (e.g., Nargis et al. 2021). Three samples were collected at a depth of approximately 10–20 cm from the water surface using precleaned polyethylene bottles. The water temperature and pH were measured by using a multi water quality analyzer (U-51, HORIBA, Ltd, Kyoto, Japan) at the time of sampling and are listed in Supplementary Table S1.
Figure 1

Sampling sites along the Buriganga River, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Figure 1

Sampling sites along the Buriganga River, Dhaka, Bangladesh.

Close modal

The water samples were filtered using a quartz fiber filter to separate the suspended solids (SS) to determine the fraction of dissolved metals and metals adsorbed on SS. The filtered water samples and filters were transported from Dhaka to the University of Shizuoka, Japan, for instrumental analysis.

Pretreatment

The samples were treated using a previously reported modification (Islam et al. 2014b; Bhuyan et al. 2017). Briefly, the filtered water samples (10 mL), nitric acid (60%, 75 μL), and internal standards (100 μL) were added to precleaned polyethylene centrifuge tubes and stored at 4 °C until the analysis. Ultrapure water was treated in the same manner as the filtered water samples to evaluate their blank levels.

A quarter of the filter was cut using Teflon scissors and weighed. The cut filter, nitric acid (60%, 2.5 mL), and HF solution (50%, 2.5 mL) were mixed in a Teflon beaker and heated at 200 °C for 30 min. Subsequently, HClO4 (60%, 3.0 mL) was added to the Teflon beaker, and the mixture was heated at 200 °C for 30 min. The mixture was heated, and the solution was almost depleted. Nitric acid (0.1 mol L−1, 5 mL) was then added to the Teflon beakers, and the contents were heated at 120 °C to dissolve the remaining residue. The nitric acid solution in the beaker was then transferred to precleaned polyethylene centrifuge tubes containing an internal standard (100 μL). The volume of the solution was fixed with nitric acid (0.1 mol L−1) to 10 mL. Precleaned filters were treated in the same manner as the filter samples to evaluate the blank level.

Instrumental analysis

The metal concentrations in the pretreated water and filter samples were measured using an ICP atomic emission spectrometer (AES) (5110 Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA) and ICP mass spectrometer (ICP-MS) (Varian 820-MS, Agilent). Samples with concentrations lower than the ICP-AES calibration range were analyzed using ICP-MS.

Quality assurance and quality control

No metals were detected in the blank samples. The calibration curves for each metal were linear over the entire range of standard concentrations (1, 10, 25, 50, 100, and 500 μg L−1 for ICP-AES; 0.05, 0.1, 0.5, 1, 5, and 10 μg L−1 for ICP-MS; coefficient of determination >0.99). The metal concentrations in the samples were determined to be in the ranges of the calibration curves.

Calculation of the single-factor pollution index

The single-factor pollution index was calculated to evaluate pollution levels in the study area (Ajibare et al. 2002; Yan et al. 2015). The single-factor pollution index was primarily developed for risk assessment in soil environments (Teng et al. 2022). Recently, this index has also been used for water quality assessment (Ajibare et al. 2002, Yan et al. 2015).
formula
(1)
where Pi (a.u.) is the single-factor pollution index of metal i, Ci (μg L−1) is the total concentration of metal i, and Si (μg L−1) is the permissible limit for metal i in the aquatic environment. The Ci values were defined as the sum of the dissolved metal concentrations and the concentrations of metals adsorbed on the SS. The median values of the three standard values from Bangladesh, the WHO, and Japan were used as Si values here (Table 1) (Bangladesh 2019; Hayami et al. 2022). The Pi values were classified into five grades: <0.4 = no pollution, 0.4–1 = slight pollution, 1–2 = medium pollution, 2–5 = heavy pollution, and >5 = serious pollution (Li & Zhang 2010).
Table 1

Metal concentrations (μg L−1) in water samples (n = 210) of the Buriganaga River in the present study, fractions, single-factor pollution index values, guideline values, and reported concentrations

BeBVCrMnCoNiCuZnAsSeMoAgCdSbPb
Concentration in the present study (μg L−1Maximum 60.5 113 60.6 97.5 968 64 87.7 77.4 363 54.8 51.7 56.4 49.1 52.7 54.7 412 
 Mean 14.1 33.2 14.0 27.7 238 15.3 22.2 26.0 65.1 16.5 12.6 13.4 11.8 12.7 13.1 29.9 
 Std. 9.97 13.2 8.55 17.6 199 10.7 14.1 15.9 48.2 8.52 8.26 9.18 7.78 8.36 8.33 51.4 
Fraction (a.u.) Mean 0.94 0.2 0.68 0.9 0.79 0.93 0.91 0.88 0.88 0.75 0.93 0.91 0.95 0.94 0.9 0.98 
 Std. 0.18 0.16 0.32 0.18 0.24 0.19 0.2 0.18 0.2 0.18 0.18 0.21 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.11 
Single-factor pollution index (a.u.) Mean n.d. <0.01 n.d. 0.49 2.1 0.29 1.0 <0.01 <0.01 1.3 1.2 0.17 n.d. 3.8 5.7 2.1 
 Std. n.d. <0.01 n.d. 0.26 2.0 0.18 0.61 <0.01 <0.01 0.74 0.68 0.12 n.d. 1.7 2.5 1.4 
Bangladesh standard(1) (μg L−1 – 1,000 – 50 100 – 100 1,000 50 10 – – – 50 
WHO guideline(2) (μg L−1 – 500 – 50 100 – 20 1,000 – 10 10 – – 10 
Japan standard(3) (μg L−1 n.d. 1,000 n.d. 20 200 50 10 1,000 10 10 70 n.d. 10 
Reported values in the Buriganga River (μg L−1Maximum n.d. n.d. n.d. 180(4); 60,000(5) 1,560(6); 310(4) 19(6); 400(4) 400(4) 81(6); 990(4) 427(6); 900(4) 2204; 7,000(5) n.d. n.d. n.d. 90(4) n.d. 210(4); 22,000(5) 
 Minimum n.d. n.d. n.d. 12(4); 40,000(5) 740(6); 6(4) 5(6); 90(4) 90(4) 25(6); 100(4) 167(6); 110(4) 5(4); 4,000(5) n.d. n.d. n.d. 30(4) n.d. 100(4) 15,000(5) 
Reported values in other Bangladesh rivers (μg L−1Maximum    126(7); 20(8); 112(9) 500(8) 9(8) 71(7); 300(8) 119(7); 27(8) 40(8) 92(7); 53(9)    22(7); 18(8);18.3(9)  64(7); 27.5(9) 
 Minimum    33(7); 46(9)   9.3(7) 23(7)  10(7); 15(9)    1(7); 2.5(9)  8(7); 5.3(9) 
Reported values of Japanese industrial(10) (μg L−1Maximum n.d. n.d. n.d. 600 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 1,000 100 n.d. n.d. 100 n.d. 1,700 
 Minimum n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 
BeBVCrMnCoNiCuZnAsSeMoAgCdSbPb
Concentration in the present study (μg L−1Maximum 60.5 113 60.6 97.5 968 64 87.7 77.4 363 54.8 51.7 56.4 49.1 52.7 54.7 412 
 Mean 14.1 33.2 14.0 27.7 238 15.3 22.2 26.0 65.1 16.5 12.6 13.4 11.8 12.7 13.1 29.9 
 Std. 9.97 13.2 8.55 17.6 199 10.7 14.1 15.9 48.2 8.52 8.26 9.18 7.78 8.36 8.33 51.4 
Fraction (a.u.) Mean 0.94 0.2 0.68 0.9 0.79 0.93 0.91 0.88 0.88 0.75 0.93 0.91 0.95 0.94 0.9 0.98 
 Std. 0.18 0.16 0.32 0.18 0.24 0.19 0.2 0.18 0.2 0.18 0.18 0.21 0.17 0.18 0.19 0.11 
Single-factor pollution index (a.u.) Mean n.d. <0.01 n.d. 0.49 2.1 0.29 1.0 <0.01 <0.01 1.3 1.2 0.17 n.d. 3.8 5.7 2.1 
 Std. n.d. <0.01 n.d. 0.26 2.0 0.18 0.61 <0.01 <0.01 0.74 0.68 0.12 n.d. 1.7 2.5 1.4 
Bangladesh standard(1) (μg L−1 – 1,000 – 50 100 – 100 1,000 50 10 – – – 50 
WHO guideline(2) (μg L−1 – 500 – 50 100 – 20 1,000 – 10 10 – – 10 
Japan standard(3) (μg L−1 n.d. 1,000 n.d. 20 200 50 10 1,000 10 10 70 n.d. 10 
Reported values in the Buriganga River (μg L−1Maximum n.d. n.d. n.d. 180(4); 60,000(5) 1,560(6); 310(4) 19(6); 400(4) 400(4) 81(6); 990(4) 427(6); 900(4) 2204; 7,000(5) n.d. n.d. n.d. 90(4) n.d. 210(4); 22,000(5) 
 Minimum n.d. n.d. n.d. 12(4); 40,000(5) 740(6); 6(4) 5(6); 90(4) 90(4) 25(6); 100(4) 167(6); 110(4) 5(4); 4,000(5) n.d. n.d. n.d. 30(4) n.d. 100(4) 15,000(5) 
Reported values in other Bangladesh rivers (μg L−1Maximum    126(7); 20(8); 112(9) 500(8) 9(8) 71(7); 300(8) 119(7); 27(8) 40(8) 92(7); 53(9)    22(7); 18(8);18.3(9)  64(7); 27.5(9) 
 Minimum    33(7); 46(9)   9.3(7) 23(7)  10(7); 15(9)    1(7); 2.5(9)  8(7); 5.3(9) 
Reported values of Japanese industrial(10) (μg L−1Maximum n.d. n.d. n.d. 600 n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 1,000 100 n.d. n.d. 100 n.d. 1,700 
 Minimum n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. n.d. 

Temporal distributions and spatial distributions of Pi values were investigated by Tukey's multiple comparison test. Prism 9 (GraphPad Software, Boston, MA) was used for the analysis.

Trace metal concentration

The maximum trace metal concentrations found in this study were comparable to those reported in the previous studies, implying that the trace metal pollution status of the Buriganga River had not improved over the last decade (Table 1) (Mohiuddin et al. 2011; Bhuiyan et al. 2014; Islam et al. 2014a; Khan et al. 2014; Islam et al. 2015; Ministry of the Environment 2022). The trace metal concentrations in the Buriganga River reported in previous studies and in the present study were 100 times higher for Cr, 7 times higher for As, 9 times higher for Cd, and 13 times higher for Pb, than those reported in factory effluents in Japan, indicating a severe level of pollution (Table 1). As the trace metal concentrations measured in this study were comparable to those reported in previous studies on the Buriganga River and industrial wastewater in Japan, the risk of trace metal pollution was high, as discussed below (Table 1).

The Mn, Co, Zn, Cd, and Pb concentrations recorded in the present study were higher than those reported for other Bangladeshi rivers, such as the Korotoa, Meghna, and Karnaphuli Rivers (Table 1) (Islam et al. 2015; Ali et al. 2016; Bhuyan et al. 2017). Thus, the Buriganga River showed a relatively high level of pollution compared to that of other rivers, and the pollution status requires continuous investigation and monitoring. Conversely, large areas of Bangladesh may be contaminated by As and Cr, because the concentrations of As and Cr in the Buriganga River were similar to the concentrations of these metals in other rivers, and the concentrations observed exceeded the levels indicated in the guidelines (Islam et al. 2015; Ali et al. 2016; Bhuyan et al. 2017).

The mean concentrations (μg L−1) of Be, B, V, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, As, Se, Mo, Ag, Cd, Sb, and Pb were 14.1 ± 9.97, 33.2 ± 13.2, 14.0 ± 8.55, 27.7 ± 17.6, 238 ± 199, 15.3 ± 10.7, 22.2 ± 14.1, 26.0 ± 15.9, 65.1 ± 48.2, 16.5 ± 8.52, 12.6 ± 8.26, 13.4 ± 9.18, 11.8 ± 7.78, 12.7 ± 8.36, 13.1 ± 8.33, and 29.9 ± 51.4, respectively. The temperature ranged from 20.3 to 23.9 °C, and pH ranged from 5.4 to 9.1 (Supplementary Table S1). The observed concentrations were lower than the trace metal concentrations in the Buriganga River reported in previous studies but higher than the guideline values (Table 1), indicating that the degree of trace metal contamination in the Buriganga River is fairly unfavorable.

Fractional ratios

Figure 2 and Table 1 show the fractional ratios of dissolved metals to metals adsorbed on the SS. These metals should accumulate at high concentrations in the river sediments because the fraction ratios of Be, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Se, Mo, Ag, Cd, Sb, and Pb were high (>0.85). The fraction ratios of B, V, Mn, and As ranged from 0.22 (B) to 0.78 (Mn). Metals form different molecules depending on their valence, and the fraction ratio changes depending on the type of molecule (Skyllberg 2008). Metals with high fraction ratios, similar to those measured in this study, might exist as highly hydrophobic molecules in the river.
Figure 2

Fraction ratios of metals. The number of samples was 210, and error shows one standard deviation.

Figure 2

Fraction ratios of metals. The number of samples was 210, and error shows one standard deviation.

Close modal

Comparing guideline values and observed values

Figure 3 and Table 1 compare the total metal concentrations measured in this study with the guideline values of the WHO, Japan, and Bangladesh. The mean values for Zn, Se, Cd, and Sb concentrations were higher than the guideline values, suggesting a high degree of contamination for these metals. Although the mean values of Cr, Mn, Co As, and Pb were lower than the guideline value, the maximum values recorded exceeded the guideline values, contributing to the pollution of the river environment. The mean and standard deviation of the total metal concentrations are shown in Table 1.
Figure 3

Total concentration of metals collected from the Buriganga River. The number of samples was 210, and error shows one standard deviation. Circles, squares, and triangles show guideline values of Japan, Bangladesh, and the WHO, respectively.

Figure 3

Total concentration of metals collected from the Buriganga River. The number of samples was 210, and error shows one standard deviation. Circles, squares, and triangles show guideline values of Japan, Bangladesh, and the WHO, respectively.

Close modal

Assessing metal pollution

Figure 4 and Table 1 show the Pi values for each metal. Because the mean Pi value of Sb was 5.7, the pollution level for this metal was classified as ‘serious pollution.’ The International Agency for Research on Cancer categorizes antimony trioxide as group B2 (‘possibly carcinogenic to humans’). Additionally, antimony trioxide is genotoxic; therefore, the morphology of Sb should be analyzed to accurately assess Sb pollution in the river.
Figure 4

Single-factor pollution index (P) of metals collected from the Buriganga River. The number of samples was 210, and error shows one standard deviation. Dotted lines show P = 0.4, 1, 1, and 5.

Figure 4

Single-factor pollution index (P) of metals collected from the Buriganga River. The number of samples was 210, and error shows one standard deviation. Dotted lines show P = 0.4, 1, 1, and 5.

Close modal

Cd, Ni, and Pb were classified as ‘heavily polluted’ (Figure 4 and Table 1). Cd is highly toxic; for example, Cd-contaminated mine drainage discharged into the Jinzu River, which flows through Toyama Prefecture in Japan, caused itai-itai disease in individuals who consumed rice cultivated using contaminated river water (Aoshima 2016). A previous study found that Cd adsorbs on SS migrating from the river to the paddy fields (Faroon et al. 2012). Indeed, the rice paddy soils were found to be contaminated with high concentrations of Cd (1–10 mg Cd kg−1) (Faroon et al. 2012). In light of the threat posed by Cd exposure to humans, future studies should examine Cd concentration in rice cultivated using water from the Buriganga River. Humans may also be exposed to Ni and Pb through the same pathway as Cd, given their high partitioning ratios to SS (Figure 2).

The Pi values and concentrations of Mn increased during the dry season (November–February), whereas the concentrations and Pi values of other elements did not increase (Figure 5 and Supplementary Fig. S1). Tukey's multiple comparison test revealed that the Mn concentrations in the dry season were significantly higher than those in the rainy season (Supplementary Table S2 and Figure 5). This may be a result of the dilution effect of rainwater on the temporal distribution of Mn in the Buriganga River (Whitehead et al. 2019). A consistent amount of Mn might be discharged into rivers throughout the year via industrial wastewater, and the Mn concentration in rivers probably increases during periods when the volume of river water is low. No seasonal changes were observed in the Pi values, except those for Mn. Consistent amounts of metals, except Mn, may leach from soils and waste and be carried into the river environment.
Figure 5

Temporal distributions of the single-factor pollution index (P) of metals.

Figure 5

Temporal distributions of the single-factor pollution index (P) of metals.

Close modal
The spatial distribution of the Pi values was not observed (Figure 6 and Supplementary Table S3), as significant differences in the concentrations of different metals among sites were not detected, except in the case of B, Cu, and Zn (Supplementary Table S3). The lack of spatial distribution implies that the metals may not originate from the sampling area. Therefore, sources may be located upstream of the sampling points on the Buriganga River.
Figure 6

Spatial distributions of the single-factor pollution index (P) of metals.

Figure 6

Spatial distributions of the single-factor pollution index (P) of metals.

Close modal

This study revealed that the Buriganga River was contaminated by anthropogenic activities because the Sb pollution was ‘serious’ in the Buriganga River, and Cd, Ni, and Pb pollution were ‘heavily polluted.’ Be, Cr, Co, Ni, Cu, Zn, Se, Mo, Ag, Cd, Sb, and Pb should accumulate in the river sediments because of their high particle-water fraction ratio. Additionally, these metals may accumulate on crops cultivated using contaminated river water. The Mn concentration was diluted by rainwater during the rainy season, whereas the concentrations of other elements did not show seasonal trends. The source of the elements may be distributed among the sources of the Buriganga River.

This study was supported by the Mitsui & Co. Environment Fund No. R18-2009.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Ajibare
A.
,
Ogungbile
P.
&
Ayeku
P.
2002
Evaluation of water pollution monitoring for heavy metal contamination: a case study of Agodi Reservoir, Oyo State, Nigeria
.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
194
(
10
),
675
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-022-10326-y
.
Ali
M. M.
,
Ali
M. L.
,
Islam
M. S.
&
Rahman
M. Z.
2016
Preliminary assessment of heavy metals in water and sediment of Karnaphuli River, Bangladesh
.
Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management
5
,
27
35
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2016.01.002
.
Aoshima
K.
2016
Itai-itai disease: renal tubular osteomalacia induced by environmental exposure to cadmium – historical review and perspectives
.
Soil Science and Plant Nutrition
62
,
319
326
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00380768.2016.1159116
.
Bhuiyan
M. A. H.
,
Dampare
S. B.
,
Islam
M. A.
&
Suzuki
S.
2014
Source apportionment and pollution evaluation of heavy metals in water and sediments of Buriganga River, Bangladesh, using multivariate analysis and pollution evaluation indices
.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
187
,
4075
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-4075-0
.
Bhuyan
M. S.
,
Bakar
M. A.
,
Akhtar
A.
,
Hossain
M. B.
,
Ali
M. M.
&
Islam
M. S.
2017
Heavy metal contamination in surface water and sediment of the Meghna River, Bangladesh
.
Environmental Nanotechnology, Monitoring & Management
8
,
273
279
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enmm.2017.10.003
.
Briffa
J.
,
Sinagra
E.
&
Blundell
R.
2020
Heavy metal pollution in the environment and their toxicological effects on humans
.
Heliyon
6
,
e04691
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04691
.
Dong
A.
,
Zhai
S.
,
Zabel
M.
,
Yu
Z.
,
Zhang
H.
&
Liu
F.
2012
Heavy metals in Changjiang estuarine and offshore sediments: responding to human activities
.
Acta Oceanologica Sinica
31
,
88
101
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-012-0195-y
.
Faroon
O.
,
Ashizawa
A.
,
Wright
S.
,
Tucker
P.
,
Jenkins
K.
,
Ingerman
L.
&
Rudisill
C.
2012
Toxicological Profile for Cadmium
.
Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (US)
,
Atlanta, GA
.
Fu
J.
,
Zhao
C.
,
Luo
Y.
,
Liu
C.
,
Kyzas
G. Z.
,
Luo
Y.
,
Zhao
D.
,
An
S.
&
Zhu
H.
2014
Heavy metals in surface sediments of the Jialu River, China: their relations to environmental factors
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
270
,
102
109
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2014.01.044
.
Hayami
T.
,
Inoue
T.
,
Imaizumi
Y.
,
Suzuki
N.
&
Ono
K.
2022
Collection of Documents Related to the Establishment of Environmental Standards
.
National Institute for Environmental Studies
.
Available from: https://www.nies.go.jp/eqsbasis/ (in Japanese).
Hoque
M. A.
,
Scheelbeek
P. F. D.
,
Vineis
P.
,
Khan
A. E.
,
Ahmed
K. M.
&
Butler
A. P.
2016
Drinking water vulnerability to climate change and alternatives for adaptation in coastal South and South East Asia
.
Climatic Change
136
,
247
263
.
https://doi.org/10.1007%2Fs10584-016-1617-1
.
Islam
M.
,
Akhtar
M.
&
Masud
M.
2006
Prediction of environmental flow to improve the water quality in the river Buriganga
. In:
Proceedings of the 17th IASTED International Conference on Modelling and Simulation
,
Montreal, QC, Canada
.
Islam
G. M. R.
,
Khan
F. E.
,
Hoque
M. M.
&
Jolly
Y. N.
2014a
Consumption of unsafe food in the adjacent area of Hazaribag tannery campus and Buriganga River embankments of Bangladesh: heavy metal contamination
.
Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
186
,
7233
7244
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-014-3923-2
.
Islam
M. S.
,
Han
S.
,
Ahmed
M. K.
&
Masunaga
S.
2014b
Assessment of trace metal contamination in water and sediment of some rivers in Bangladesh
.
Journal of Water and Environment Technology
12
,
109
121
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.etap.2014.12.009
.
Islam
M. S.
,
Ahmed
M. K.
,
Raknuzzaman
M.
,
Habibullah -Al- Mamun
M.
&
Islam
M. K.
2015
Heavy metal pollution in surface water and sediment: a preliminary assessment of an urban river in a developing country
.
Ecological Indicators
48
,
282
291
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.08.016
.
Kawser Ahmed
M.
,
Baki
M. A.
,
Kundu
G. K.
,
Saiful Islam
M.
,
Monirul Islam
M.
&
Muzammel Hossain
M.
2016
Human health risks from heavy metals in fish of Buriganga River, Bangladesh
.
SpringerPlus
5
,
1697
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-4813-z
.
Khan
F. E.
,
Jolly
Y. N.
,
Islam
G. M. R.
,
Akhter
S.
&
Kabir
J.
2014
Contamination status and health risk assessment of trace elements in foodstuffs collected from the Buriganga River embankments, Dhaka, Bangladesh
.
International Journal of Food Contamination
1
,
1
.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40550-014-0001-z
.
Li
S.
&
Zhang
Q.
2010
Risk assessment and seasonal variations of dissolved trace elements and heavy metals in the Upper Han River, China
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
181
,
1051
1058
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.05.120
.
Ministry of the Environment Japan
2022
Water Pollutant Discharge Comprehensive Survey
.
Mohiuddin
K. M.
,
Ogawa
Y.
,
Zakir
H. M.
,
Otomo
K.
&
Shikazono
N.
2011
Heavy metals contamination in water and sediments of an urban river in a developing country
.
International Journal of Environmental Science & Technology
8
,
723
736
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03326257
.
Nargis
A.
,
Habib
A.
,
Harun Or
R.
,
Harun
H. B.
,
Islam Sarker
M. S.
,
Jin
R.
,
Liu
G.
,
Liu
W.
,
Al-Razee
A. N.
,
Chen
K.
&
Cai
M.
2021
Status of multielement in water of the river Buriganga, Bangladesh: aquatic chemistry of metal ions in polluted river water
.
Emerging Contaminants
7
,
99
115
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emcon.2021.03.001
.
Raknuzzaman
M.
,
Ahmed
M. K.
,
Islam
M. S.
,
Habibullah-Al-Mamun
M.
,
Tokumura
M.
,
Sekine
M.
&
Masunaga
S.
2016
Assessment of trace metals in surface water and sediment collected from polluted coastal areas of Bangladesh
.
Journal of Water and Environment Technology
14
,
247
259
.
http://dx.doi.org/10.2965/jwet.15-038
.
Republic of Bangladesh Government of the People's
2019
Water Quality Parameters Bangladesh Standards
.
Department of Public Health Engineering, Dhaka
.
Whitehead
P. G.
,
Bussi
G.
,
Peters
R.
,
Hossain
M. A.
,
Softley
L.
,
Shawal
S.
,
Jin
L.
,
Rampley
C. P. N.
,
Holdship
P.
,
Hope
R.
&
Alabaster
G.
2019
Modelling heavy metals in the Buriganga River System, Dhaka, Bangladesh: impacts of tannery pollution control
.
Science of the Total Environment
697
,
134090
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134090
.
World Health Organization
2023
IARC Monographs on the Identification of Carcinogenic Hazards to Humans, List of Classifications
.
Yan
C. A.
,
Zhang
W.
,
Zhang
Z.
,
Liu
Y.
,
Deng
C.
&
Nie
N.
2015
Assessment of water quality and identification of polluted risky regions based on field observations & GIS in the Honghe River Watershed, China
.
PLoS One
10
,
e0119130
.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119130
.
Yuan
G. L.
,
Liu
C.
,
Chen
L.
&
Yang
Z.
2011
Inputting history of heavy metals into the inland lake recorded in sediment profiles: Poyang Lake in China
.
Journal of Hazardous Materials
185
,
336
345
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.09.039
.
Zhao
M.
,
Wang
H. B.
,
Ji
L. N.
&
Mao
Z. W.
2013
Insights into metalloenzyme microenvironments: biomimetic metal complexes with a functional second coordination sphere
.
Chemical Society Reviews
42
,
8360
8375
.
https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cs60162e
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Supplementary data