The present study addresses the use of analytical epidemiologic approaches to subsidize the establishment of priorities in environmental sanitation interventions. An epidemiological investigation was carried out in 1993 in the urban area of Betim, a southeast Brazilian City of 160,000 inhabitants. The case-control ‘inclusive’ (or case-cohort) design, with a sample of 997 cases and 999 controls, was employed. Cases were defined as children of less than five years of age presenting diarrhoea episodes, while controls were randomly selected among children of the same age, living in the study area. After logistic regression adjustment, 11 of several exposure variables analysed were significantly associated with diarrhoea. Four different criteria, using as risk measures the relative risk, the attributable risk, the standardized coefficient of the logistic regression and the cost standardized coefficient, were used in order to define intervention priorities.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
September 01 2005
Setting priorities for environmental sanitation interventions based on epidemiological criteria:A Brazilian study
Léo Heller;
1Department of Sanitary and Environmental Engineering, School of Engineering, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Av. Contorno, 842/701, 30.110-060, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Tel: 0055-31-3238-1958, Fax: 0055-31-3238-1879; E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Enrico A. Colosimo;
Enrico A. Colosimo
2Department of Statistics, Exact Sciences Institute, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil
Search for other works by this author on:
Carlos M. F. Antunes
Carlos M. F. Antunes
3Department of Parasitology, Biological Sciences Institute, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brazil
Search for other works by this author on:
J Water Health (2005) 3 (3): 271–281.
Citation
Léo Heller, Enrico A. Colosimo, Carlos M. F. Antunes; Setting priorities for environmental sanitation interventions based on epidemiological criteria:A Brazilian study. J Water Health 1 September 2005; 3 (3): 271–281. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2005.043
Download citation file: