Confined food-animal operations in the United States produce more than 40 times the amount of waste than human biosolids generated from US wastewater treatment plants. Unlike biosolids, which must meet regulatory standards for pathogen levels, vector attraction reduction and metal content, no treatment is required of waste from animal agriculture. This omission is of concern based on dramatic changes in livestock production over the past 50 years, which have resulted in large increases in animal waste and a high degree of geographic concentration of waste associated with the regional growth of industrial food-animal production. Regulatory measures have not kept pace with these changes. The purpose of this paper is to: 1) review trends that affect food-animal waste production in the United States, 2) assess risks associated with food-animal wastes, 3) contrast food-animal waste management practices to management practices for biosolids and 4) make recommendations based on existing and potential policy options to improve management of food-animal waste.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Research Article|
June 08 2010
Managing waste from confined animal feeding operations in the United States: the need for sanitary reform
Jay P. Graham;
1Division of Environmental Health Engineering, Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room E6642, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
Tel.: (443) 286-8335 Fax: (410) 955-9334; E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Keeve E. Nachman
Keeve E. Nachman
2Department of Environmental Health Sciences, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Center for a Livable Future, 615 N. Wolfe Street, Room E2650, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
J Water Health (2010) 8 (4): 646–670.
Article history
Received:
May 17 2009
Accepted:
March 16 2010
Citation
Jay P. Graham, Keeve E. Nachman; Managing waste from confined animal feeding operations in the United States: the need for sanitary reform. J Water Health 1 December 2010; 8 (4): 646–670. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2010.075
Download citation file: