Abstract
The present research work investigated the removal efficiency of acid-activated bentonite blended with a sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) adsorbent for the removal of reactive red 198 (RR198) from a synthetic dye solution. The effect of the adsorption parameters of bentonite on SCBA blending ratio, dye solution pH, adsorption contact, adsorbent dosage, and initial dye concentration was investigated, and the parameters were optimized for maximum RR198 removal from the synthetic dye solution. At an optimum condition of 1:1 bentonite to the SCBA blending ratio, a solution pH of 2, 3.7 g/L of adsorbent dosage, and 15 mg/L of initial dye concentration 150 min of adsorption time, the properties of adsorbents such as adsorbent specific surface area, crystalline phase structure, functional groups, and surface morphologies of the adsorbents were investigated. At optimum conditions, 97% RR198 removal efficiency of the adsorbent was achieved. In order to determine adsorption kinetics and isotherm models, different adsorption models were employed. It was observed that the adsorption of the RR198 dye into the acid-activated bentonite blended with the SCBA adsorbent was represented well by the Langmuir isotherm model and the adsorption kinetics order was found to be the pseudo-second order.
HIGHLIGHTS
Regenerable and low-cost adsorbents.
Removal of reactive dye using blended inorganic and organic adsorbents.
Principle of waste to wealth.
Improving the quality of industrial wastewater effluents.
Graphical Abstract
INTRODUCTION
Dye-laden wastewater discharge into the environment has created severe environmental problems due to the persistent nature of dyes that significantly affects water bodies. Dyes of synthetic origin have complex structures and most of them are non-biodegradable. Environmental pollution from wastewater containing synthetic-origin dyes, as well as its effect on the ecosystem, has been increasing and has become a serious concern for the general public at all levels (McKay et al. 1999; Quan et al. 2017). In the industrial sectors such as food, textiles, leather, pharmaceutical, pulp, and paper, thousands of synthetic dyes are being used and discharged into the environment as wastewater. Among the different dye-consuming industries, the textile industry is the major industry that consumes a huge quantity of dyes and different hazardous chemicals that are discharged into the environment and water bodies as wastewater. Different research findings have also reported that discharge from the textile industry has become a matter of serious environmental and health concern for communities and ecosystems in their vicinity (Hameed et al. 2009; Carmen & Daniela 2012). Globally, the textile industry consumes about 56% of the total synthetic dyes produced (Jain & Gogate 2018). This figure testifies to the fact that the textile industry is the major consumer of synthetic dyes and discharges a large amount of synthetic dyes containing wastewater. In the textile industry, of all dyes used, from dyeing and finishing process units alone, about 10–25% of dyes are discharged as a by-product or waste product into the surrounding freshwater (Carmen & Daniela 2012).
Of the different types of dyes used in the textile industry, reactive dyes such as RR198 are widely used due to their advantageous properties such as simple application techniques, bright colour, and low energy consumption (Dizge et al. 2008). In their research findings, Carmen & Daniel (2012) have reported that the fixation rates of reactive dyes on the surface of materials range from 50 to 90%, while the remaining reactive dyes are discharged into the environment as effluent wastewater. Shoukat et al. (2019) have investigated that a dye-laden water body has devastating effects on the photosynthesis of aquatic plants as well as aesthetic value due to the blocking of sunlight. The investigation conducted by Dizge et al. (2008) has also demonstrated that dye-containing wastewater has complex molecular structures and high solubility. Due to the synthetic origin of reactive dyes, conventional and biological treatment methods are not effective at meeting the required treatment levels. The mitigation of such hazardous dyes from wastewater has become a matter of urgent importance because of the increasingly alarming environmental threat posed by them, thus attracting the attention of researchers.
Various methods have been investigated and reported for dye removal from water, such as photocatalytic and photochemical processes (Bahadori et al. 2020), sedimentation, membrane separation, and flotation (Dharupaneedi et al. 2019), electrodialysis (Xue et al. 2015), reverse osmosis (Nataraj et al. 2009), electrochemical oxidation (Singh et al. 2016), advanced oxidation processes (AOPs) like ozonation, and photocatalytic reaction (Somensi et al. 2010). Although these methods have their own advantages and disadvantages, their industrial applications are limited. However, the adsorption method is the most commonly used and industrially well-established methods for the removal of dyes from wastewater (Dawood et al. 2014). Of the different organic and inorganic adsorbents commercially available, activated carbon (AC) is widely used and is an efficient adsorbent for removing dyes from wastewater as it has better adsorption capacity, a mesoporous and tortuous pore structure, and a large surface area to volume ratio. However, it has the limitation of high production and regeneration cost. Currently, many research studies are being conducted to overcome the limitations posed by commercial-AC. One such option is searching for alternative adsorbents with low cost, better adsorption capacity, and easy availability. Synthesis of adsorbents from agricultural solid wastes such as biomass-based-AC and clay minerals is the best option to achieve the desired objectives. Globally, clay materials have been gaining increased attention as a potential adsorbent due to their low cost, easy accessibility, and easy applicability to industrial scale wastewater treatment (Khataee et al. 2015; Li et al. 2015). Of the different types of clay, bentonite is a natural clay that is widely available and applied as an adsorbent for the removal of pollutants such as RR198 from wastewater (Amin et al. 2015; Toor et al. 2015; Belaroussi et al. 2018; Javed et al. 2018).
Reactive red 198 (RR198), an azo dye group, has been mostly consumed in the textile industry and is one of the major pollutants present in textile wastewater (Salari et al. 2021). Various adsorbents have been investigated and reported for the removal of RR198 from textile wastewater. Alumina/carbon nanotubes (Malakootian et al. 2015), zeolite modification with cellulose nanofibre/magnetic nanoparticles (Salari et al. 2021), and the synthesis of polyaniline/Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles (Tayebi et al. 2016) are among the investigated and reported adsorbents for the removal of RR198 from textile wastewater. However, its large-scale application is limited due to either its long synthesis procedures or their associated high processing cost. In the present research work, efforts have been made to develop adsorbents from low-cost and easily available Ethiopian bentonite for the removal of RR198 from an aqueous solution. The adsorption capacities, chemical and mechanical stability, and affinity to the adsorbate have been enhanced through acid activation and surface modification with sugarcane bagasse ash (SCBA) for the effective removal of RR198 from the aqueous solution.
MATERIALS AND EXPERIMENTAL METHODS
Materials and chemicals
Bentonite was collected from Gewane Afar regional state, and SCBA was collected from Wonji Shewa Sugar Factory Oromia regional state, Ethiopia, respectively. Both materials were collected and placed in a plastic lining bag and brought to the Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Environmental Engineering Postgraduate Laboratory (AASTU-EEPL). Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) pellets and hydrochloric acid (HCl, purity >37%) were obtained from AASTU-EEPL. RR198 was obtained from the Yirgalm Addis Textile Factory PLC, Ethiopia. RR198 characteristics and its structure are illustrated in Table 1 and Figure 1, respectively. The different apparatuses and equipment used were Brannuer–Emmett–Teller (BET) (SA-9600 series, Japan), X-ray diffraction (XRD) (XRD-7000, Japan), scanning electron microscopy (SEM) (INSPECT, F50, USA) basic shaker (SK-300), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) (Perkin Elmer, USA), weighing balance, and different types of glassware and lab apparatus.
Characteristic . | Reactive red 198 (RR198) . |
---|---|
Molecular formula | C27H18ClN7Na4O15S5 |
Colour index name | Reactive Red-198 |
λmax | 520 nm |
Class | Monoazo (–N = N-bond) |
Characteristic . | Reactive red 198 (RR198) . |
---|---|
Molecular formula | C27H18ClN7Na4O15S5 |
Colour index name | Reactive Red-198 |
λmax | 520 nm |
Class | Monoazo (–N = N-bond) |
Adsorbent and adsorbate preparation
The crushed bentonite was washed using distilled water, dried in an oven (FAITHFUL) adjusted at 105 °C for 12 h, and ground to a powder. The SCBA was also washed using distilled water and dried in an oven set at 105 °C for 12 h. The size reduced and the dried adsorbents were placed in glass bottles for an acid activation experiment. A total of 1,000 mg/L of stock dye solution was prepared using distilled water and diluted as necessary to obtain the dye solution's required inlet concentrations for batch experiments.
Acid activation adsorbents
The acid activation experiment was carried out in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask with a 200-mL working volume at 100 rpm a basic shaker (SK-300) and at 25 °C. Ten grams of prepared bentonite and SCBA for each sample were weighted and added to 0.5–4 M HCl and 23–277 min contact time mixed properly. At the end of the mixing time, the residue was separated from the filtrate by using a Buchner funnel. The residual bentonite and SCBA were washed with distilled water several times until they were free from Cl−1 ions and pH 5. Then, the samples were dried at 105 °C for 12 h and ground to reach 63 μm with less particle size. Activated adsorbent materials were stored in assigned acid-activated bentonite clay (ABC) and acid-activated sugarcane bagasse ash (ASCBA) in separate glass bottles for further experiments. Based on the specific surface area of the prepared activated adsorbents, the contact time and HCl concentration were selected for further process.
The point of zero charge (pHPZC)
The point of zero charge (pHzpc) is used to explain when the electrical charge of surface adsorbent is zero. The pHpzc for the acid-activated bentonite blended with the acid-activated SCBA used in this study was explained as per the solid addition method described by Aljeboree et al. (2017). A known amount of (0.1 g) of acid-activated bentonite blended with acid-activated SCBA was added to 200 mL of 0.1 M of NaCl solution at a pH range of 2–12 adjusted by 0.1 M NaOH or HCl. The blended adsorbents and sodium chloride mixture were placed in a thermoline scientific orbital shaker incubator at a speed of 130 rpm for 24 h. The final solution pH was measured and the pHpzc for each adsorbent was calculated from the pH (initial) vs. ΔpH (initial–final) plot.
Adsorbent characterization
BET (SA-9600 series, Japan) was used to determine the specific surface of adsorbents before and after activation of the samples. The crystalline phases of adsorbent materials before and after acid activation were identified using XRD (XRD-7000, Japan). SEM (INSPECT, F50, USA) was used to examine the surface morphology of acid-activated and raw adsorbent materials before and after the adsorption of RR198. FTIR (Perkin Elmer, USA) was used for functional group analysis of acid-activated and raw adsorbents. An infrared spectrum was recorded in the region of 4,000–400 cm−1 at a resolution of 4 cm−1. A UV spectrophotometer (JASCO V-770, Japan) was used for determining the concentration of RR198 in the solution by recording the UV absorbance at λmax 520 nm.
Batch adsorption studies
Kinetic study
An adsorption kinetic study evaluates the rate or speed of pollutants adsorbed toward the surface from the solution. Therefore, many researchers have applied different kinetic models such as pseudo-first order (PFO, Equation (3)), pseudo-second order (PSO, Equation (4)), and intra-particle diffusion (ID, Equation (5)) models, and these have been commonly used for the adsorption kinetic study (Table 2). The obtained experimental results in this study for RR198 dye removal using acid-activated bentonite blended with SCBA were evaluated by using the aforementioned different kinetic equations shown in Table 2.
Models . | Equation . | References . | Equation number . |
---|---|---|---|
Pseudo-first order | Singh et al. (2020) | (3) | |
Pseudo-second order | Singh et al. (2020) | (4) | |
Intra-particle diffusion | Alemayehu et al. (2011) | (5) |
Models . | Equation . | References . | Equation number . |
---|---|---|---|
Pseudo-first order | Singh et al. (2020) | (3) | |
Pseudo-second order | Singh et al. (2020) | (4) | |
Intra-particle diffusion | Alemayehu et al. (2011) | (5) |
qe is the mass of dye adsorbed at equilibrium (mg/g), qt is the mass of dye adsorbed at time t (mg/g), K1 is PFO constant (min−1), K2 is PSO constant (g/mg/min), and Kp is ID constant (mg/g/min0.5).
Adsorption isotherms
The Langmuir parameters are qmax (mg/g), which are related to the adsorption density, and KL (L/mg), which is indicative of the adsorption energy. Both parameters were calculated from the plot .
The parameter Kf (L/g) and n (dimensionless) are the Freundlich constants, which are related to the total adsorption capacity and intensity of adsorption, respectively. The Freundlich constant Kf is used to evaluate the relative capacity or power of adsorption for an adsorbent.
Desorption study
RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Adsorbent characterization
Crystalline structures
The XRD results for bentonite and SCBA are shown in Figure 2(a)–2(d). Figure 2(c) and 2(b) show strong peaks at 2θ = 19.75°, 26.65°, and 28° for raw bentonite and 19.9°, 20.98°, and 26.8° for acid-activated bentonite. XRD analysis of raw and acid-activated bentonite indicates the presence of quartz as the main component. Gypsum, cristobalite, and quartz are also present (Ajemba 2014). Similar results were reported by investigators (Zhao et al. 2010; Khalilzadeh Shirazi et al. 2020) for raw bentonite clay at 2θ = 26.68°, 28.59°, and 36.11°. On the other hand, strong peaks at 2θ = 24.6°, 26.7°, 28°, and 35.6° for raw SCBA and 21.9°, 26.6°, 27.7°, and 36.8° for acid-activated SCBA were obtained (Figure 2(a) and 2(d)), respectively. As can be predicted, SCBA has quartz as the main component. A similar result was reported by Alves et al. (2017) for raw SCBA. In general, all four samples showed approximately similar patterns, demonstrating that the activating processes did not have a significant effect on the structure of the adsorbents.
SEM analysis
The surface morphology of the adsorbents before and after adsorption process is shown in Figure 3(a)–3(e). The SEM images in Figure 3(a) and 3(c) show that the surface of raw bentonite and SCBA is rough and uneven. However, after acid activation (Figure 3(b) and 3(d)), the adsorbents’ surface of both adsorbents became rougher, dense, high pores, with available active sites, and the internal surface. These changes in the morphological properties of adsorbents are due to the removal of impurities from bentonite and the SCBA surface. As can be seen from Figure 3(b) and 3(d), more irregular and significant numbers of pores due to the modification of adsorbents were observed, which indicate more dye molecules on the surface adsorbed. In Figure 3(e), a smaller proportion of irregular structures, including active sites and pores, were also observed, which may be elucidated by the slight reduction in particle structure of the adsorbents during the modification and adsorption processes. Similar remarks about porous structure improvement and adsorption for surface modification of the SCBE (Faria et al. 2012; Alves et al. 2017; Farirai et al. 2020) and raw bentonite (Javed et al. 2018) were also reported.
FTIR analysis
The FTIR results for all adsorbents are shown in Figure 4(a)–4(d). The raw bentonite absorption band at 3,600 and 1,639 cm−1 indicates O–H group bending and stretching in hydration water on the bentonite surface. A similar study was reported by Al-Essa (2018). An absorption band at 1,027 cm−1 is recognized for stretching vibration Si–O bands, which is strong evidence for a silicate structure. The band at 796 cm−1 confirmed the presence of quartz in the raw bentonite as reported by Zhirong et al. (2011). The activated bentonite absorption band at 3,621 cm−1 shows a free O–H group on the surface of the activated bentonite. A peak was also observed at 1,626 cm−1 bending and stretching bands Al – Al-OH, which indicates a leaching out of octahedral cations like Al3+ and Mg2+ from the structure of bentonite. The peak observed at 1,001 cm−1 shows the availability of amorphous silica on activated bentonite. A previous study (Bendou & Amrani 2014) also reported that modified bentonite is rich in amorphous silica.
On the other hand, the FTIR analysis of raw SCBA shows a peak at 2,988 cm−1 representing the presence of O–H on the raw ash surface. The FTIR analysis of acid-activated SCBA shows a peak at 2,982 cm−1 indicating the presence of the O–H group on the surface of activated ash. The peak observed at 1,049 and 1,053 cm−1 is attributed to Si–O–Si symmetric and asymmetric stretching on acid-activated and raw SCBA, respectively. According to a previous investigation, the bands observed at about 450–455 and 1,050–1,070 cm−1 were attributed to the Si–O–Si symmetric and asymmetric stretching, respectively (Kalapathy et al. 2000; Mourhly et al. 2015). The presence of a band at approximately 770–797 cm−1 is due to the Si–O–Si symmetric stretching as reported by Rahman et al. (2015). In general, it can be observed that most band positions have not changed during the surface modification processes, which implies that the basic adsorbent's structure has not collapsed.
BET analysis
The specific surface area of the adsorbents was measured using a nitrogen gas adsorption–desorption technique at 77 k using the surface analyser equipment (SA-9600 series, Japan). The specific surface areas (BET values) of the adsorbents were compared. Accordingly, 57.7, 100.97, 4.94, and 30.85 m2/g of raw bentonite, acid-activated bentonite, raw SCBA, and acid-activated SCBA were evaluated, respectively. It was observed that activating with acid enhanced the specific surface area of the adsorbents. Similar observations have been reported for raw bentonite 13.9 m2/g (Carvalho et al. 2019), 12 m2/g (Santos et al. 2016), 66.2 m2/g (Al-Essa 2018), and 25.7 m2/g (Toor et al. 2015), for acid-activated bentonite 287.8 m2/g (Al-Essa 2018) and 84.12 m2/g (Toor et al. 2015), and for raw SCBA 1.5 m2/g (Farirai et al. 2020).
The point of zero charge (pHpzc)
The pHpzc for acid-activated bentonite blended with acid-activated SCBA was found to be 5.6 (Figure 5). When the solution pH is less than the pHpzc of the adsorbent, more positive charge density is expected to bind on the surface of the adsorbent, hence increasing the removal efficiency of anionic dyes. As expected, when the pH was lower than the pHpzc, RR198 was highly adsorbed onto the surface of the adsorbent due to columbic attraction. A similar observation was reported for AC prepared from wastes (Acevedo et al. 2015).
Effect of adsorbent blended ratio
In this investigation, batch experiments were carried out at different acid-activated adsorbent blended ratios at 25 °C and 200 rpm. Table 3 shows the effect of ABC blended with ASCBA on the adsorption of RR198, while other parameters such as an initial concentration of 70 mg/L, a contact time of 60 min, and an adsorbent dose of 2.5 g/L were kept constant. As can be seen in Table 3, the proportional dye removal increased when the blended ratio of the adsorbents was one to one (1:1). This might be attributed to the fact that both adsorbents have adequate active sites for the adsorption of RR198. Preliminary studies also confirmed that the RR198 removal efficiency of the single (unblended) adsorbent was lower than that of the blended one; i.e. the activated SCBA was 58% and activated bentonite was 82% (data not given). Hence, activated bentonite blended with SCBA was chosen in this study. Additional testing of the individual adsorbents, including their removal mechanisms, is, however, required to verify whether the removal of RR198 using a blended adsorbent is a sustainable method.
Blended ratio (ASCBA:ABC) . | Proportional dye removal (%) . |
---|---|
1:3 | 85 |
1:1 | 97 |
3:1 | 75 |
Blended ratio (ASCBA:ABC) . | Proportional dye removal (%) . |
---|---|
1:3 | 85 |
1:1 | 97 |
3:1 | 75 |
Effect of pH
Elimination of dyes from water depends on the pH of the solution (Kausar & Bhatti 2013), since pH can change the adsorbents’ and pollutants’ interaction surface charge, which enhances repulsion or attraction (Kausar et al. 2018). In this investigation, the batch experiments were carried out at different solution pH values of 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12, while other parameters such as initial dye concentration (30 mg/L), contact time (60 min), and adsorbent dose (2 g/L) were kept constant at 25 °C and 200 rpm. As can be observed in Figure 6, the percentage of RR198 removed from the aqueous solution significantly decreases (from 97 to 3.3%) as the pH of the solution increases from 2 to 12, indicating that the adsorption of RR198 is likely to be based on physical interactions between the surface of the adsorbent and the adsorbate (Salari et al. 2021). At the lower pH range, adsorption increases due to increasing protonation (Alimohammadi et al. 2016). At high pH values, the competition with OH ions increases, and RR198 adsorption decreases. Similar reports confirm that RR198 removal is less efficient under alkaline conditions (Rashid et al. 2016; Naeem et al. 2017).
Effect of contact time
A further, similar set-up of batch studies were carried out with various contact times (0, 30, 60, 90, 120, 150, and 180 min). All other parameters were kept constant, such as the adsorbent blended ratio (1:1), initial dye concentration (30 mg/L), solution of pH (2 pH), and adsorbent dose (3.7 g/L). Figure 7 shows that dye removal begins at some points within 30 min and then continues at a constant rate until almost reaching equilibrium after 150 min. According to the experimental results, the highest dye removal efficiency was achieved at a contact time of 150 min. The increased contact time enhanced the interaction between dye molecule and the adsorbent.
When the contact time increases, dye removal also initially increases and finally becomes a constant trend, illustrating attained equilibrium. The initial adsorption of dye is fast due to the availability of vacant active sites on the surface of the adsorbent which can be occupied easily by the RR198 dye because a phenomenal, high removal efficiency was achieved (Mollahosseini et al. 2019). After a certain time, only too low increments in the dye removal were observed because there were few active sites on the surface adsorbent. After a 150 min removal, no change in efficiency was observed. Thus, an optimal contact time of 150 min was selected for the other experiments.
Effect of initial dye concentration
The effect of the initial RR198 concentration that varied in the range of 15–100 mg/L on the adsorption was investigated under specific conditions (a contact time of 150 min; adsorbent dose of 3.7 g/L; pH of 2; blended ratio of 1:1; at 25 °C). The RR198 adsorption efficiencies and calculated adsorption densities depending on the initial concentration are shown in Figure 8. In the processes, the concentrations of the dye play an important role. On changing the initial concentration of the RR198 solution from 15 to 100 mg/L, the adsorption densities increase from 0.79 to 3.8 mg of RR198 per gram of the adsorbent. On the other hand, with a lower initial concentration of RR198, the adsorption efficiency (percentage removal) is higher than the efficiency attained when higher initial concentrations are used (Figure 8). While the RR198 adsorption yield was found as 97.2% for 15 mg/L of the initial concentration, this value was 65.7% for that of 100 mg/L. These results indicate that the competition for adsorption sites becomes rigorous, and energetically less favourable sites become involved with increasing RR198 concentrations in the solution. This is a common finding and has been largely reported in the literature (Zhou et al. 2019; Mirzapour et al. 2020).
Effect of adsorbent dosage
A series of batch experiments were carried out using various adsorbent doses of 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2.5, 3, and 3.7 g/L, while the other parameters were kept constant, such as initial dye concentration (70 mg/L), contact time (60 min), and solution pH (2 pH) at 25 °C. By changing the dose from 0.5 to 3.7 g/L, the removal efficiency of RR198 increased from 81.4 to 94% (Figure 9). The maximum removal efficiency was exhibited at 3.7 g/L of the adsorbent. This observation was attributed to the increase in the number of free adsorption sites. However, RR198 adsorbed per unit mass of the adsorbent significantly decreased with an increasing adsorbent dose (from 22.8 to 4.4 mg/g). This may be attributed to the higher adsorbent amount creating particle aggregation, resulting in a decrease in the total surface area and an increase in diffusional path length, both of which contribute to a decrease in the amount adsorbed per unit mass (Figure 9). These observations were also confirmed by other investigators (Elkady et al. 2011; Ghaneian et al. 2015; Bellifa et al. 2017; Dehvari et al. 2017).
Adsorption kinetics modelling
In order to define the kinetics of RR198 adsorption, the parameters for the adsorption process were studied for the contact time ranging between 30 and 180 min by monitoring the present removal of RR198 by the adsorbent. The equilibrium parameters qe(exp) and qe(cal) (mg/g) and the adsorption rate constant K1 (min−1) and K2 (g/mg/h) are reported in Table 4. The kinetic plots were prepared (data not given). The calculated equilibrium capacity values (qe(cal)) were very close to the experimentally determined values (qe(exp)). Excellent fits (R2 = 0.992) indicated that the PSO kinetic model was applicable. The applicability of this model implies that the rate-limiting step may be chemisorption involving valence forces through sharing or exchanging of electrons between the adsorbent and the adsorbate. Although the adsorption process in the present experiment is considered as a surface phenomenon, it is also postulated that the rate-limiting step in the adsorption process might include intra-particle diffusion. As expected, the plots of qt vs. t0.5, according to the intra-particle diffusion model (Equation (5)), were linear (data not given), and the related parameters are listed in Table 4. Kp is the characteristic for the rate of adsorption, where intra-particle diffusion is rate controlling in nature. Similar trends were reported by other investigators (Tayebi et al. 2016; Mirzapour et al. 2020).
PFO . | PSO . | ID . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
qe(cal) (mg/g) . | qe(exp) (mg/g) . | K1 (min−1) . | R2 . | qe(cal) (mg/g) . | qe(exp) (mg/g) . | K2 (g/mg/min) . | R2 . | Kp (mg/g/min0.5) . | R2 . |
2.4 | 2.63 | 0.022 | 0.874 | 2.58 | 2.63 | 0.036 | 0.992 | 0.184 | 0.85 |
PFO . | PSO . | ID . | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
qe(cal) (mg/g) . | qe(exp) (mg/g) . | K1 (min−1) . | R2 . | qe(cal) (mg/g) . | qe(exp) (mg/g) . | K2 (g/mg/min) . | R2 . | Kp (mg/g/min0.5) . | R2 . |
2.4 | 2.63 | 0.022 | 0.874 | 2.58 | 2.63 | 0.036 | 0.992 | 0.184 | 0.85 |
Adsorption isotherms
The adsorption of RR198 onto the adsorbent was described by both Freundlich and Langmuir isotherm models. The Freundlich model assumes that adsorption occurs on a heterogeneous surface through multilayer adsorption, and the adsorbed amount increases with increasing equilibrium concentrations. In contrast, the Langmuir model assumes an asymptotic approach to a monolayer surface coverage (Alemayehu et al. 2011). In this work, an analysis of the relationship between the adsorption capacity of the adsorbent and different RR198 initial concentrations (from 15 to 100 mg/L) was performed using isotherm equations (Equations (6) and (7), as given in subsection 2.8). The related parameters for the fitting of both equations at constant temperature are summarized in Table 5. From the obtained optimization procedure, it became evident that the Langmuir isotherm equation (R2 = 0.98) described the system better than the Freundlich isotherm equation (R2 = 0.86). This indicated the homogeneous distribution of binding sites on the surface of the mixed adsorbents, which had no interaction of dye molecules.
Langmuir . | Freundlich . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
qmax (mg/g) . | KL (L/mg) . | R2 . | Kf (L/g) . | 1/n . | R2 . |
14.67 | 53.74 | 0.98 | 2.66 | 0.69 | 0.86 |
Langmuir . | Freundlich . | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
qmax (mg/g) . | KL (L/mg) . | R2 . | Kf (L/g) . | 1/n . | R2 . |
14.67 | 53.74 | 0.98 | 2.66 | 0.69 | 0.86 |
The blended adsorbent sorption isotherms utilized in this work was also compared with previously studied adsorbents for the uptake of dyes, as shown in Table 6. As can be seen in the table, the RR198 uptake capacity of the blended adsorbent used in this study is higher than the AC/bentonite/Fe3O4 blended adsorbent (Mirzapour et al. 2020). Above all, the raw materials (bentonite and SCBA) are easily accessible and readily available, in contrast to some of the other adsorbents, confirming that acid-activated bentonite blended with SCBA could be a promising candidate for the uptake of RR198 from wastewater.
Dyes . | Adsorbents . | Adsorption capacity (mg/g) . | Isotherm models . | References . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reactive red 198 | PAni/Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles | 45.454 | Langmuir | Tayebi et al. (2016) |
Basic violet 16 (BV16) and reactive red 195 | Natural bentonite and charred dolomite | 821.63 and 7.03 | Langmuir | Khalilzadeh et al. (2020) |
Reactive black 5 | Chemically modified banana peel powder | 211.8 | Langmuir | Munagapati et al. (2020) |
Reactive black 5 and Congo red | Banana peel powder | 49.2 and 164.6 | Langmuir | Subbaiah et al. (2018) |
Acid blue 25 | Phosphoric acid treated rubber leaf powder | 28.09 | Langmuir | Khalid et al. (2015) |
Reactive red 198 | Activated carbon/bentonite/Fe3O4 nanocomposite | 4.86 | Langmuir | Mirzapour et al. (2020) |
Reactive dyes red 198 | Acid-activated bentonite blended with SCBA | 14.67 | Langmuir | This study |
Reactive red 141 | Activated carbon | 41.5 | Freundlich | Leechart et al. (2009) |
Dyes . | Adsorbents . | Adsorption capacity (mg/g) . | Isotherm models . | References . |
---|---|---|---|---|
Reactive red 198 | PAni/Fe3O4 magnetic nanoparticles | 45.454 | Langmuir | Tayebi et al. (2016) |
Basic violet 16 (BV16) and reactive red 195 | Natural bentonite and charred dolomite | 821.63 and 7.03 | Langmuir | Khalilzadeh et al. (2020) |
Reactive black 5 | Chemically modified banana peel powder | 211.8 | Langmuir | Munagapati et al. (2020) |
Reactive black 5 and Congo red | Banana peel powder | 49.2 and 164.6 | Langmuir | Subbaiah et al. (2018) |
Acid blue 25 | Phosphoric acid treated rubber leaf powder | 28.09 | Langmuir | Khalid et al. (2015) |
Reactive red 198 | Activated carbon/bentonite/Fe3O4 nanocomposite | 4.86 | Langmuir | Mirzapour et al. (2020) |
Reactive dyes red 198 | Acid-activated bentonite blended with SCBA | 14.67 | Langmuir | This study |
Reactive red 141 | Activated carbon | 41.5 | Freundlich | Leechart et al. (2009) |
Desorption and reusability test
To develop a cost-effective adsorbent for pollutant removal from an aqueous environment, it is important that the adsorbent should be regenerated for reuse. The pH effect on the efficiency of RR198 adsorption on the blended adsorbent showed (Figure 6) that RR198 adsorption capacity was very low at pH >8, suggesting the possibility of desorbing adsorbed RR198 from the saturated adsorbent using an alkaline solution. Based on this, batch desorption–adsorption experiments were carried out as explained in subsection 2.9. The RR198-loaded adsorbent was successfully regenerated using an alkaline solution. Figure 10 shows the blended adsorbent's removal efficiency through four cycles of the desorption–adsorption process. As can be observed in the desorption and reusability experiments, the adsorption capacities of the regenerated adsorbents were found to be effective (94.5%) to remove RR198 from aqueous solutions. Hence, these results confirmed that acid-activated bentonite blended with SCBA can be reused several times for RR198 removal from wastewater, implying that it is found to be a promising material.
CONCLUSION
RR198 adsorption was tested using acid-activated bentonite blended with SCBA as the adsorbent. Adsorption parameters were applied to describe the best removal performance. The maximum removal efficiency (97%) was attained at optimal parameters such as an adsorbent blended ratio of 1:1, a solution pH of 2, a contact time of 150 min, an adsorbent dose of 3.7 g/L, and an initial dye concentration of 15 mg/L. The adsorption isotherm model was fitted better by Langmuir than by Freundlich, and the PSO model fitted the adsorption kinetics better than the other models. The RR198-loaded adsorbent was successfully regenerated using an alkaline solution. Therefore, the results of the study demonstrated that a low-cost acid-activated blended adsorbent could be considered as a promising material for the removal of dyes from wastewater. Additional testing of the blended adsorbent in a continuous reactor is, however, required to verify whether the removal of RR198 from dye-laden industrial wastewater is more efficient.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
We would like to thank the Addis Ababa Science and Technology University, Environmental Engineering Department, for offering us full laboratory facilities, the Yirgalem Addis Textile Factory for providing reactive dyes, the Wonji Shewa Sugar Factory for providing SCBA, and the Candela Pharmaceutical Industry for providing an FTIR instrument for the analysis of samples.
FUNDING
This work was supported by the Addis Ababa Science and Technology University and the Debre Tabor University.
DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.