A multi-stage anoxic/oxic (A/O) moving-bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) system with multiple chambers was established for municipal wastewater treatment. The active biomass quantity, bioactivity, and biomass yield of a pilot-scale multi-stage MBBR were investigated in this study. The microbial activity and heterotrophic yield coefficients (YH) were measured using respirometric techniques in each chamber at different temperature conditions. Meanwhile, the growth, nitrification, and denitrification rates of functional biomass were also quantified as specific respiration rate (SOUR). The total active biomass in the multi-stage A/O-MBBR system was 0.71–1.68 g COD/m2 for the aerobic reactor and 0.39–1.44 g COD/m2 for the anoxic reactor at 10–19 °C. The YH values for the anoxic reactors were 0.61–0.69, which were comparable to the recommended value of the activated sludge model (ASM1). The correlation coefficient between Nitrospira and the autotrophic specific respiration rate (SOURA) was 0.82. Meanwhile, denitrifying genera showed a significant correlation with the heterotrophic specific respiration rate (SOURH) and the active heterotrophic biomass (XH). This study provided insights into biomass distribution and the corresponding kinetic parameters for the multi-stage MBBR systems, which may serve as a reference for process design and trouble shooting.

  • The active biomass was quantitatively investigated in a multi-stage MBBR.

  • Microbial activity and heterotrophic yield coefficients were quantified in each reactor.

  • The use of respirometric techniques to assess microbial performance is feasible.

  • The correlation analysis of microbial community with active biomass and SOUR was carried out.

  • Data and facts were provided via long-term comprehensive investigation.

Moving-bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs) consist of free-suspended carrier elements, the surface of which provides attachment sites for biofilm growth (Leyva-Díaz et al. 2013). The compact design, simple operation, no requirement for sludge recycling, high microbial activity, and stable nitrification make MBBRs highly effective for nitrogen removal from wastewater (Morgan-Sagastume 2018; Ooi et al. 2018; Du et al. 2022). The MBBR process has a higher biomass residence time compared to the activated sludge method (Avcioglu et al. 1998), which provides favorable conditions for the enrichment of nitrifying bacteria with low specific growth rates (Gu et al. 2014; Li et al. 2020) while ensuring the biomass number. According to the main mode of microbial presence, MBBR systems can be divided into hybrid MBBR (i.e., IFAS) or pure MBBR technology. Due to China's wastewater treatment issues, such as small land area, high standards, and poor stability, IFAS has been successfully used in upgrading Chinese wastewater treatment plants with its unique advantages. However, there are fewer studies investigating the microbial growth and application of pure MBBR, especially for the multi-stage pure MBBR process.

Based on the reaction kinetics principle to optimize the removal process of pollutants, staging biological reactors has been proposed (Joss et al. 2006). Due to the advantages of the original MBBR process, the multi-stage MBBR process has become a novel process preference in recent years due to its ability to control the concentration and nature of the growth substrate in contact with the biomass and the ability to grow different types of active microbial systems in a targeted manner (Polesel et al. 2017; Torresi et al. 2017). Additionally, it was shown that significant differences in microbial communities for nitrogen removal and pollutants biotransformation in the multi-stage MBBR were determined by the different gradients of organic loading and mass concentrations (Polesel et al. 2017). Furthermore, the special operating mode of multiple reactors in series is more conducive to screening and enrichment of dominant nitrifying bacteria (Zhang et al. 2019; Fan et al. 2022). At present, the research on the multi-stage pure membrane A/O-MBBR system mostly focuses on the conversion relationship of carbon and nitrogen removal, while the complex biomass distribution and activity that play a key role in this relationship are less studied.

The biological treatment process of wastewater is completed through a series of complex microbial metabolic processes. Low temperature can directly affect the growth and metabolism of biomass and inhibit microbial activity, especially the inhibition of autotrophic nitrifying bacteria (Antoniou et al. 1990). Although MBBR is considered an option to ensure the effective removal of pollutants under low-temperature conditions, the weakening effect of low temperature on pollutant removal efficiency during winter is not negligible.

Delatolla et al. (2010) discovered that when the temperature dropped from 14 to 3 °C, the ammonium nitrogen removal rate decreased by 73% (from 0.60 to 0.16 kg-N/(m3·d)). Ashkanani et al. (2019) noticed a reduction of 54.7, 62.3, and 89%, respectively, in the surface ammonia removal rate of MBBR systems using different bio-carriers as the temperature decreased from 35 to 4 °C. Regarding the effect of temperature on denitrification, it has been shown that low temperatures directly affect the hydrolysis rate of substrates involved in denitrification and the activity of denitrifying reductases (Fu et al. 2022). While denitrification will be abolished at temperatures below 3 °C (Ghafari et al. 2008), Young et al. (2017a) showed that a temperature dropping to 5 °C led to a decrease in denitrification rates by 50%. Whereas studies reflecting the effect of temperature on nitrification and denitrification in terms of ammonia removal rates are adequate, it remains to be considered how temperature directly affects biomass distribution and activity which influences nitrification and denitrification from a microbiological perspective. Young et al. (2017a) showed that the increase in biofilm thickness of the MBBR system at low temperatures can compensate for the increase in the ammonia removal efficiency of single cells to improve the nitrification performance. Therefore, the number of active biomass and the cells’ activity per unit surface area largely determine the final treatment effect of the system. Studies investigating the inhibition effect of low-temperature conditions focused on the influence on nitrification efficiency, while the effect of low temperature on heterotrophic denitrification remains to be elucidated. Moreover, it has been previously shown that the microbial activity of pure MBBR occurs only in the biofilm, even when the wastewater contains exfoliated biofilms and free-growing microbial suspension carriers (Piculell et al. 2014; di Biase et al. 2021). In that case, it is particularly important to consider biomass composition, activity, and diversity when assessing its function (Helbling et al. 2015; Johnson et al. 2015; Torresi et al. 2018).

Therefore, the use of respirometry combined with the Activated Sludge Model No 1 (AMS1) equation (Henze et al. 2000; Ferrai et al. 2010), which consists of biofilm growth and decay, would represent a tool to measure microbial activity and composition to obtain the number and kinetic parameters of active biomass in the reactor while reflecting the activity of different types of biomass (Bina et al. 2018). The oxygen uptake rate (OUR, ) is an important parameter in respirometric techniques for assessing biomass viability. Different specific respiration rates (SOUR, ) indicate the respiration rate per unit mass of biofilm. Current respirometry techniques have been used to assess various aspects such as the kinetics of bacteria and activated sludge (Sánchez-Zurano et al. 2022); the biodegradability of municipal and industrial wastewater (Hayet et al. 2016); biomass activity and wastewater characterization in UCT-MBR pilot plants (Di Trapani et al. 2011); the toxicity of pharmaceutical compounds in activated sludge (Vasiliadou et al. 2018); and the effect of alkyl phenolic compounds on kinetic coefficients and biomass activity in MBBR (Bina et al. 2018). Respirometry has become a common technique for assessing microbial activity and characterizing microbial performance. Considering that the type of substrate in the reactor affects the kinetic parameters (Amin et al. 2013; Mansouri 2014), it is necessary and beneficial to determine the kinetic parameters of the more sensitive microorganisms under different conditions to develop a suitable design for simulating biological processes. Among them, the accurate quantification of the yield coefficient of heterotrophic biomass (YH) will promote the reasonable control of source dosage under low-temperature conditions in winter.

Here, we evaluated the effect of temperature changes on the distribution and activity of active biomass in a multi-stage MBBR system. With the help of respirometric techniques and the ASM1 equation, we characterized biomass viability. A method for reflecting the nitrification and denitrification capacity per unit mass of biomass in terms of SOUR was described and the effect of temperature variation on this as well as on YH was reported. High-throughput techniques aid in analyzing the correlation between microbial communities and active biomass. We provided a simple and rapid method to measure and compare the microbial performance in each reactor of the multi-stage MBBR system.

Pilot MBBR system description

Samples for this study were obtained from a pilot system at a municipal wastewater treatment plant in Qingdao, China, between November and December 2021. The system was in a long-term stable operation state before the test. A schematic representation three-stage A/O-MBBR pure membrane pilot system is shown in Figure 1. The overall length × width × height of the pilot system was 14 m × 1 m × 1.7 m, divided equally into 10 reactors, which consisted of three-stage sub-systems in series. The first A/O subsystem consisted of two anoxic reactors (A1 and A2) and two oxic reactors (O3 and O4,), the second A/O subsystem consisted of two anoxic reactors (A5 and A6) and two oxic reactors (O7 and O8,), while the third A/O subsystem consisted of one anoxic reactor (A9) and one oxic reactor (O10). Each reactor was filled with cylindrical-shaped carriers made of polyethylene with a volumetric filling rate of 50%. Each carrier has a diameter of 25 mm, a height of 10 mm, and a specific surface area of 500 m2/m3. The system adopted a two-point continuous water inlet (ratio of inlet flow: 1:1), with water inlet points at A2 and A6, and a total water inlet flow of 28.8 m3/d. The cross-sectional flow rate between each reactor was 1.2 m/h. The total hydraulic retention time was 11.7 h. Nitrate recycling was set up in two stages, the first stage was set up from the O4-MBBR to the A1-MBBR (sludge return ratio 200%) and the second stage was set up from O8-MBBR to A5-MBBR (sludge return ratio 100%). The stirrer in the anoxic reactor had a speed of 90–110 r/min and the dissolved oxygen (DO) in the aerobic reactor was maintained at 3.5–9.6 mg O2 /L by aeration, by which the adequate fluidization of the bio-carriers was ensured. To ensure smooth post-denitrification, 50 mg COD/L sodium acetate was added to the A9-MBBR as the exogenous carbon source. The samples were taken in winter with temperatures ranging from 10 to 19 °C. Divided into three temperature stages according to the variation of the system temperature with the seasons (T1: 16–19 °C, T2: 13–16 °C, T3: 10–13 °C).
Figure 1

Schematic representation of the three-stage A/O-MBBR pilot system.

Figure 1

Schematic representation of the three-stage A/O-MBBR pilot system.

Close modal

Wastewater characteristics

The system inlet water was pumped from the effluent primary sedimentation tank of the wastewater treatment plant, and an air floatation tank was applied as additional pretreatment for particle separation before the raw wastewater entered the pilot system (inlet wastewater characteristics are shown in Table 1). The water quality parameters for each reactor stage are shown in Table 2. Due to variation of the actual sewage, the above water quality parameters are within the normal range of variation.

Table 1

Experimental conditions and wastewater quality characteristics of the wastewater fed to the multi-stage A/O-MBBR system

StageReactorDO (mg/L)SCOD (mg/L)NH4+-N (mg/L)NO2-N (mg/L)NO3-N (mg/L)
Stage 1 A1 0.86 ± 0.16 42.4 ± 17.7 4.9 ± 1.8 0.62 ± 0.25 10.21 ± 1.9 
A2 0.2 ± 0.03 59.45 ± 12.0 16.8 ± 1.3 0.8 ± 0.22 2.53 ± 1.40 
O3 4.77 ± 0.35 44.00 ± 14.1 12.4 ± 1.8 1.48 ± 0.28 4.17 ± 1.58 
O4 3.23 ± 0.73 39.7 ± 9.7 5.6 ± 1.8 1.49 ± 0.47 9.09 ± 1.93 
Stage 2 A5 0.9 ± 0.18 51.2 ± 15.6 4.65 ± 1.7 1.15 ± 0.51 9.72 ± 1.82 
A6 0.18 ± 0.03 60.5 ± 6.4 18.7 ± 2.6 0.92 ± 0.17 1.80 ± 1.28 
O7 4.19 ± 0.25 46.8 ± 8.8 12.05 ± 2.3 1.64 ± 0.39 4.68 ± 1.73 
O8 5.09 ± 0.15 50.75 ± 17.55 6.2 ± 1.8 1.97 ± 0.93 9.25 ± 1.97 
Stage 3 A9 0.3 ± 0.04 47.5 ± 7.5 5.25 ± 1.4 3.74 ± 2.62 1.25 ± 0.66 
O10 5.08 ± 0.63 35.1 ± 24.2 1.85 ± 1.6 1.07 ± 0.67 6.35 ± 2.26 
StageReactorDO (mg/L)SCOD (mg/L)NH4+-N (mg/L)NO2-N (mg/L)NO3-N (mg/L)
Stage 1 A1 0.86 ± 0.16 42.4 ± 17.7 4.9 ± 1.8 0.62 ± 0.25 10.21 ± 1.9 
A2 0.2 ± 0.03 59.45 ± 12.0 16.8 ± 1.3 0.8 ± 0.22 2.53 ± 1.40 
O3 4.77 ± 0.35 44.00 ± 14.1 12.4 ± 1.8 1.48 ± 0.28 4.17 ± 1.58 
O4 3.23 ± 0.73 39.7 ± 9.7 5.6 ± 1.8 1.49 ± 0.47 9.09 ± 1.93 
Stage 2 A5 0.9 ± 0.18 51.2 ± 15.6 4.65 ± 1.7 1.15 ± 0.51 9.72 ± 1.82 
A6 0.18 ± 0.03 60.5 ± 6.4 18.7 ± 2.6 0.92 ± 0.17 1.80 ± 1.28 
O7 4.19 ± 0.25 46.8 ± 8.8 12.05 ± 2.3 1.64 ± 0.39 4.68 ± 1.73 
O8 5.09 ± 0.15 50.75 ± 17.55 6.2 ± 1.8 1.97 ± 0.93 9.25 ± 1.97 
Stage 3 A9 0.3 ± 0.04 47.5 ± 7.5 5.25 ± 1.4 3.74 ± 2.62 1.25 ± 0.66 
O10 5.08 ± 0.63 35.1 ± 24.2 1.85 ± 1.6 1.07 ± 0.67 6.35 ± 2.26 
Table 2

The water quality parameters of the multi-stage A/O-MBBR system in each reactor

Inlet flow (m3/d)Nitrate recycling ratioSCOD (mg/L)NH4+-N (mg/L)TIN (mg/L)Temperature (°C)pH
28.8 200% and 100% 141.46 ± 24.31 39.50 ± 4.94 40.60 ± 5.00 10–19 7–9 
Inlet flow (m3/d)Nitrate recycling ratioSCOD (mg/L)NH4+-N (mg/L)TIN (mg/L)Temperature (°C)pH
28.8 200% and 100% 141.46 ± 24.31 39.50 ± 4.94 40.60 ± 5.00 10–19 7–9 

Respirometric tests

The respiration measurement device for this experiment is based on the continuous measurement of DO in a closed apparatus, with subsequent calculation of the OUR of autotrophic and heterotrophic bacteria. As shown in Figure 2(a), the apparatus consists of a cylindrical Plexiglas reactor with an effective volume of 5 L. Heating tape is fixed on the outside of the apparatus to ensure that the temperature during the test is consistent with the temperature at the time of sampling.
Figure 2

The batch set-up for respiration tests. (a) The SOUR measurement system and (b) the typical DO profile with endogenous, autotrophic, and heterotrophic respiration rates of the biofilm.

Figure 2

The batch set-up for respiration tests. (a) The SOUR measurement system and (b) the typical DO profile with endogenous, autotrophic, and heterotrophic respiration rates of the biofilm.

Close modal

The good fluidization state of the suspended bio-carrier was ensured by a wavemaker, which allows full contact with the nutrients in the water. An aeration system with a 6 cm bread bubble tray was connected to an 8 L/min aeration pump via an oxygen pipe and operating at a constant airflow. A portable DO meter, the Hash HQ40d (HACH, Loveland, CO, USA), was used in connection with the data collection system for real-time monitoring of the DO concentration in the reactor at a frequency of 1 min. A wireless temperature measurement device was used to obtain the reactor's internal temperature in real-time to facilitate the timely treatment of temperature abnormalities.

Batch respirometric experiments

Respirometry is commonly used for the control of activated sludge processes by estimating the ASM1 parameters (Avcioglu et al. 1998; Collivignarelli et al. 2019). Based on the aerobic biomass respiration, OURs of the suspended bio-carriers were assessed. The process was divided into three stages to obtain the endogenous respiration rate (OURE), the autotrophic respiration rate (OURA), the heterotrophic respiration rate (OURH), the active autotrophic biomass (XA), the active heterotrophic biomass (XH) and YH, where the specific steps and analyses for the quantification of XA and XH were carried out according to Wang et al. (2018). The equations of XA, XH, and SOUR are shown as Equations (1)–(3), where the definitions of notions are listed in Table 3.
(1)
(2)
(3)
where the unit of XA and XH was g (COD)/m2, the m2 was relative to the surface area of biomass. The unit of specific biomass quantity is converted according to Equation (4).
(4)
where V was the effective volume of the reactor (L), N was the number of bio-carriers, S was the specific surface area of the one bio-carrier (m2).
Table 3

Variables and model parameters of biomass growth and respiration rate models

NotationDefinitionUnits
 Active autotrophic biomass  
 Active heterotrophic biomass  
 Yield for autotrophic biomass  
 Yield for heterotrophic biomass  
 Maximum specific growth rate for autotrophic biomass  
 Maximum specific growth rate for heterotrophic biomass  
OUR Respiration rate  
OURA Autotrophic respiration rate  
OURH Heterotrophic respiration rate  
SOUR Specific respiration rate  
MLSS Mixed liquor suspended solids  
NotationDefinitionUnits
 Active autotrophic biomass  
 Active heterotrophic biomass  
 Yield for autotrophic biomass  
 Yield for heterotrophic biomass  
 Maximum specific growth rate for autotrophic biomass  
 Maximum specific growth rate for heterotrophic biomass  
OUR Respiration rate  
OURA Autotrophic respiration rate  
OURH Heterotrophic respiration rate  
SOUR Specific respiration rate  
MLSS Mixed liquor suspended solids  

During the first step, the suspended bio-carriers were rinsed 3–5 times with tap water to remove the attached organic matter, allowing them to enter the endogenous respiration phase, which can be verified by continuous monitoring of the DO curves. Full aeration was carried out to make the DO concentration in the reactor reach the saturated DO (10–12 mg O2/L) before entering the next stage. During the second stage, when the DO concentration in the batch set-up reached 10–12 mg O2/L, a prepared ammonium chloride solution of a certain concentration was measured with a pipette and injected into the reaction device to ensure the initial concentration of 20 mg N/L. While during the third stage, 20 mg N/L allylthiourea was added to inhibit nitrification, and sodium acetate at a dose of 250 mg COD/L was used for heterotrophic biomass respiration. The batch set-up was sealed at all stages to avoid interference from the outside air and the DO profiles were monitored. The DO profiles for the three stages of the test procedure are shown in Figure 2(b).

Yield coefficient of heterotrophic biomass

The batch method of activated sludge and the respirometric method was commonly used to estimate the YH (Strotmann et al. 1999; Vanrolleghem et al. 1999; Gujer 2006). In this study, we made improvements based on Ochoa et al. (2002), Wang et al. (2018), and some other studies, and successfully applied the batch respirometric method. Considering the possibility of biomass denitrification in the anoxic under low DO (DO < 2 mg/L) conditions (Fathali et al. 2019), the YH estimation was revised. According to the mechanism of organic matter consumption through heterotrophic biomass aerobic respiration, the equation of YH value is shown as Equation (5).
(5)
where was the difference in COD concentration between the beginning and end of the third stage (mg/L), was the integral value of OUR at any time during the third stage, was the difference in COD concentration between the beginning and end of the third stage (mg/L).

High-throughput sequencing methods

During the operating period, eight carriers were randomly selected from each reactor. Subsequently, biofilms were immediately scraped from the carriers and stored at −80 °C. Samples were named A1_1, A1_2, and A1_3 (A1_1, A1_2, and A1_3 represent the A1 reactor at T1, T2, and T3 respectively). Both microbial community genomic DNA extraction and DNA sequencing were performed according to the standard protocols by Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co., Ltd (Shanghai, China) and the detailed steps were previously described (Zhang et al. 2020). The hypervariable region V3–V4 of bacterial 16S rRNA gene was amplified with the primer pairs 338F (5′-ACTCCTACGGGAGGCAGCAG-3′) and 806R (5′-GGACTACHVGGGTWTCTAAT-3′).

Statistical methods and software

The correlation analysis in this study was performed on origin 2021 Pro using the Principal Component Analysis plug-in, and the experimental data were statistically analyzed and pre-processed using Microsoft Excel 2019.

Active biomass

Overall distribution of active biomass

Multi-stage MBBR systems have different concentrations of substrates within each reactor due to their installation conditions. Biofilms in different reactors are exposed to different ratios of substrate types and different available conditions (e.g., readily biodegradable organics, slowly biodegradable organics, or hard-to-biodegrade organics). The pilot system is divided into each reactor, which acts alone as a specific functional area to remove conventional pollutants (e.g., organic carbon and nitrogen), there are differences in the external environment for microbial growth, which can affect the growth of microbial types in a targeted manner. The environmental conditions combined with substrate conditions determine the number of active biomass and the proportion of microbial types in each reactor of a multi-stage MBBR system (Revilla et al. 2016). As shown in Figure 3, the total active biomass was the highest in the O3-MBBR and O7-MBBR with 1.6835 and 1.5512 g COD/m2, respectively. As the inlet points are located at A2-MBBR and A6-MBBR, the substrate content in A2-MBBR and A6-MBBR with their subsequent O3-MBBR and O4-MBBR was relatively adequate and more favorable to microbial growth, which is also the reason why A2-MBBR and A6-MBBR (A2: 1.2670 g COD/m2; A6: 1.4381 g COD/m2) had a much higher total active biomass than that of A1-MBBR and A5-MBBR (A1: 0.3870 g COD/m2; A5: 0.5154 g COD/m2). Furthermore, the A5-MBBR and A6-MBBR reactors receive substrates from the first MBBR reactor, where the difficult biological substrates may have been transformed due to longer residence time and aeration in the O3-MBBR and O4-MBBR and can be used by the biomass, which may also account for the slightly higher total active biomass of A5-MBBR compared with A1-MBBR, and the same as A6-MBBR compared with A2-MBBR. The O3-MBBR and O7-MBBR environments were more favorable for autotrophic biomass growth due to external environmental regulation (e.g., aeration conditions, low C/N ratio conditions), which in turn increased the overall active biomass. Along with a further reduction in substrate loading and creating an environment with a low C/N ratio, the growth of autotrophic biomass was in a favorable position (Kumar et al. 2012; Sun et al. 2014). Although the total active biomass was lower for O4-MBBR than O3-MBBR and lower for O8-MBBR than O7-MBBR (O4: 1.0353 g COD/m2, O8: 1.2262 g COD/m2), the proportion of autotrophic biomass was higher for O4-MBBR than O3-MBBR and higher for O8-MBBR than O7-MBBR (O4: 34% > O3: 15%; O8: 35% > O7: 20%) (Figure 3(a)). Additionally, the active autotrophic biomass of O4-MBBR and O8-MBBR were higher than the second aerobic reactor reported by Wang et al. (2018) (21.2%), 14.7% for the intermittently aerated MBBR system reported by Luan et al. (2022), and the activated sludge reported by Fernandes et al. (2014) (12.2%). A previous study has shown that only 0.5–4% of the activated autotrophic biomass was present in a full-scale activated sludge system (Ma et al. 2015). Moreover, the influence of the nitrate recycling carrying large amounts of DO created conditions for autotrophic biomass growth; thus, leading to A1-MBBR and A5-MBBR autotrophic biomass proportions reaching 28 and 30%, respectively, even higher than in the O3-MBBR and O7-MBBR nitrification function reactor. Excessive DO levels have an impact on the growth of dominant populations in the system while competing with denitrifying bacteria for carbon sources, severely limiting the denitrification effect. This was one of the reasons why the system had set the inlet point at A2-MBBR and A6-MBBR while improving the carbon source utilization. This indicates that the reasonable setting of the nitrate recycling point and the nitrate recycling ratio is essential for improving the denitrification effect of the system. A9-MBBR was the anoxic reactor with the highest proportion of heterotrophic biomass in the system (96%), probably due to the external injection of sodium acetate as the readily biodegradable organic matter is more readily available to the heterotrophic biomass (Torresi et al. 2017; Pelaz et al. 2018). The proportion of autotrophic biomass in the O10-MBBR was at a maximum of 38% (end of the system) and the reactor contained fewer electron donors (organic matter) while most of the biodegradable organic matter has been removed in the front-end system, preventing anaerobic alienation while creating an environment for the dominant growth of autotrophic biomass (Wu et al. 2014; He et al. 2018). Additionally, the ratio of autotrophic biomass varied as the substrate load changed throughout the system; thus, it was worth considering the specific role of organic load on the growth of autotrophic biomass (Almomani et al. 2014; Young et al. 2016, 2017a, 2017b), which can provide a reference for us to control the ratio and abundance of autotrophic biomass by controlling the organic load and ultimately monitoring the nitrification activity of the aerobic reactor.
Figure 3

Active biomass distribution of the biofilm at each sub-reactor. (a) Heterotrophic and autotrophic biomass quantity and proportion and (b) variation of the biofilm active biomass distribution at different temperatures.

Figure 3

Active biomass distribution of the biofilm at each sub-reactor. (a) Heterotrophic and autotrophic biomass quantity and proportion and (b) variation of the biofilm active biomass distribution at different temperatures.

Close modal

The above analysis showed that the multi-stage A/O-MBBR system was favorable to the formation of different proportions of active biomass and different functional zones met the treatment needs of different pollutants. Furthermore, the proportion of autotrophic biomass in the MBBR system was much higher than that in the activated sludge system (Fernandes et al. 2014), which was more favorable to nitrification.

Active biomass distribution at different temperatures

Temperature is one of the most important factors that determines the MBBR performance. While nitrification is particularly sensitive to temperature and stops below 8 °C (Hurse & Connor 1999), MBBR's unique structure can reduce the wear of biofilm and outperforms other biological treatment technologies even in harsh low-temperature environments (Young et al. 2017a).

Figure 3(b) illustrates the active biomass variation in each reactor at different temperatures for a multi-stage A/O-MBBR. Overall, it can be seen that the effect of temperature on the active biomass was still relatively large. With the decrease in temperature, the total active biomass showed an upward trend. In particular, a larger increase in total active biomass can be seen when the temperature was reduced from T1 to T2, with an increase of approximately 25–87%. In contrast, the maximum increase in total active biomass was only 24% when the temperature was reduced from T2 to T3; thus indicating that low temperatures limited biomass growth. Interestingly, the total active biomass of each reactor in the first A/O-MBBR subsystem decreased during this process, while MLSS (Supplementary material, Table A1) did not; this indicated that the proportion of active material within the biofilm decreased with lower temperatures, whereas the second A/O-MBBR subsystem was relatively unaffected. The decrease in total active biomass in the first A/O-MBBR subsystem during temperature change is mainly due to the drop in XH. The maximum growth of XH in the second A/O-MBBR subsystem was only 24%, a decrease of 62% compared to the maximum growth of XH from T1 to T3. Furthermore, during the whole temperature change, the XA in the aerobic reactor maintained a high growth rate, which was more obvious between T1 and T2, increasing by 51–184%, with an increase of about 8–79% from T2 to T3 and a slight decrease in the relative growth, which showed that further decreases in temperature lead XA growth inhibition. Overall, the XA growth is more tolerant of low temperatures than XH and is closely linked to changes in water conditions.

The variation in the respective ratios of XA and XH in each reactor at different temperatures for the multi-stage A/O-MBBR is shown in Figure 3(b). Firstly, the XH ratios in each reactor decreased with dropping temperature, while the corresponding XA proportion increased. This indicates that the competitive advantage of autotrophic biomass growth was enhanced at low temperatures. Furthermore, we demonstrated that the growth of autotrophic biomass was more tolerant to low temperatures compared to heterotrophic biomass. The most significant increase in ratios of O3-MBBR and O7-MBBR in the aerobic reactor during the temperature decrease (T1 to T3) was from 10 to 24% and from 9 to 28%, respectively, which was equivalent to the decrease in heterotrophic biomass growth within the reactor. However, the increase in XA ratios was 5 and 4% for O4-MBBR and O10-MBBR, respectively, with a decrease for the O8-MBBR, which may be related to the greater increase in active heterotrophic biomass. Due to the DO from reflux, the XA ratios in A1-MBBR and A5-MBBR increased by 16 and 11%, respectively, with the nitrate recycling ratio in the first A/O-MBBR subsystem being higher than that in the second A/O-MBBR subsystem. Overall, the active biomass ratio characteristics indicate that autotrophic biomass had a greater growth advantage at low temperature.

Respiration rate

Endogenous specific respiration rate

As an important parameter in respirometry, the respiration rate is often used to assess the biological capacity of biomass (Bina et al. 2018). SOUR refers to the rate of respiration per unit mass of biofilm, and different types of SOURs have different meanings. The value of the endogenous SOUR (SOURE) can indirectly represent the total number of decaying cells within the biofilm or the rate of decay. The variation in SOURE in the anoxic reactor as a function of temperature is shown in Figure 4(a). The SOURE of each reactor showed a decreasing trend with dropping temperature, indicating that the total amount of cell decay in the biofilm was reduced and the rate of cell accumulation was accelerated at low temperatures, which is consistent with the previous discussion that the active biomass increased under these conditions. The SOURE of A1, A2, A5, and A6 was approximately 0.01 at T1 and fluctuated above and below 0.03 when the temperature was reduced to T3. However, the SOURE of A9-MBBR has been generally lower than that of other anoxic reactors. The A9 reactor was supplemented with sodium acetate as an external carbon source, which may have contributed to its relatively low cell decay rate.
Figure 4

The SOUR of biofilm at different temperatures. (a) Endogenous SOUR for biofilms in anoxic reactors; (b) endogenous SOUR for biofilms in aerobic reactors; (c) autotrophic SOUR for biofilms in aerobic reactors; and (d) heterotrophic SOUR for anoxic reactors.

Figure 4

The SOUR of biofilm at different temperatures. (a) Endogenous SOUR for biofilms in anoxic reactors; (b) endogenous SOUR for biofilms in aerobic reactors; (c) autotrophic SOUR for biofilms in aerobic reactors; and (d) heterotrophic SOUR for anoxic reactors.

Close modal

The SOURE of aerobic reactors is generally higher than that of anoxic reactors (Figure 4(b)), which is in part related to their own large active biomass base. Furthermore, the aerobic reactor SOURE exhibited the same response following variation in temperature as the anoxic reactor, suggesting that the low temperature is more favorable to biomass cell accumulation, which to a certain extent compensates for the reduced rate of degradation of organic matter by individual cells (Young et al. 2017a). The SOURE of O3, O4, O7, and O8 had a maximum value of about 0.07 at T1, with approximately 0.02–0.04 at T3. Furthermore, the SOURE of O4 and O8 was less sensitive to the temperature drop than O3-MBBR and O7-MBBR. The SOURE of O10-MBBR was less affected by temperature and was always low (approximately 0.02 . It is worth considering that A9-MBBR and O10-MBBR, as the third stage of the A/O-MBBR, both had a lower SOURE than their counterparts, and the biomass on the biofilm was much less impacted by the substrate load, as the stable material conditions might have promoted microbial growth. The SOURE can be used as a parameter to determine the state of microbial cell death or the state of cell accumulation, thus reflecting the system section operational efficacy.

Autotrophic specific respiration rate

The autotrophic SOUR (SOURA) can indirectly represent nitrification activity. The SOURA declined with decreasing temperature (Figure 4(c)), indicating that low temperatures hindered the nitrification activity of autotrophic biomass. The SOURA of O4-MBBR, O8-MBBR, and O10-MBBR was significantly higher than that of O-MBBR 3 and O7-MBBR, indicating a relatively good nitrification performance, consistent with their higher XA. Furthermore, SOURA was significantly influenced by temperature, with SOURA values for O4-MBBR, O7-MBBR, O8-MBBR, and O10-MBBR varying from 0.1313 to 0.0853, 0.1163 to 0.0748, 0.1817 to 0.1161, and 0.1765 to 0.1083 , respectively (Supplementary material, Table A2), as the temperature decreased from T1 to T3, producing a decrease of 35, 36, 36, and 39%, respectively. Additionally, the SOURA of O3-MBBR indicates a low nitrification activity, fluctuating around 0.050 . Although the total active biomass of the O3-MBBR was consistently high, it was limited by the large proportion of XH, which led to intense competition between biomass and thus decreased the nitrification activity.

Heterotrophic specific respiration rate

Biological nitrogen removal is carried out through denitrification, which can be divided into autotrophic and heterotrophic denitrification, depending on the carbon source required for biological growth (Karanasios et al. 2010). Of these, heterotrophic denitrification has been shown to be the most common and cost-effective process (Wang & Chu 2016). The amount and activity of heterotrophic biomass together determine the effectiveness of biological heterotrophic denitrification. The heterotrophic SOUR (SOURH) can indirectly represent the denitrification activity per unit mass of biofilm. Temperature had the same effect on SOURH as it did on SOURA (Figure 4(d)); this suggested that low temperatures have a negative effect on both the nitrification and denitrification activity per unit mass of biofilm. For the five anoxic reactors, SOURH was A9 > A6 > A2 > A5 > A1. The substrate of A9-MBBR's microbial contact was superior to that of other anoxic reactors, thus allowing its unit mass biofilm to have a higher active biomass and activity per mass of biofilm and better denitrification, which corresponded to its analytical results for XH. The SOURH values for A1-MBBR, A2-MBBR, A5-MBBR, A6-MBBR, and A9-MBBR varied from 0.0375 to 0.0274, 0.1439 to 0.111, 0.0535 to 0.0403, 0.1879 to 0.1484, and 0.2395 to 0.1745 (Supplementary material, Table A2) as the temperature decreased from T1 to T3, producing a decrease of 27, 23, 25, 21, and 27%, respectively, which was 10% lower than the decline efficiency of SOURA. This suggests that the nitrification effect was more heavily influenced by low temperatures than the denitrification (the above is only for a unit mass of biofilm). This it also related to the proportion of active biomass type contained per unit mass of biofilm. The result was in contrast to the positive effect of low temperatures on active biomass growth. Although the increase in active biomass per unit mass of biofilm cannot counteract the effect of low temperature on its activity, the SOURH of A6-MBBR was greater at T1 than at T2, which could be due to the large increase in the amount of active heterotrophic biomass during the process (Figure 3(a)), thus offsetting the effect of the weakened activity. The SOURH of A1-MBBR and A5-MBBR was significantly lower than in other anoxic reactors. The high redox potential of the nitrifying liquid was generated by the high amount of DO carried by the nitrate recycling, which allowed heterotrophic biomass to use DO for respiratory metabolism and inhibit enzyme activity. Consequently, the anaerobic/anoxic biomass activity was inhibited and can lead to ineffective denitrification (Li et al. 2021; Fu et al. 2022), which is corroborated by the high proportion of XA observed.

Yield coefficient of heterotrophic biomass

The yield coefficient of YH is an important parameter in the field of wastewater degradation kinetics and in determining the degradation kinetics of specific chemical substances (Strotmann et al. 1999). Supplementary material, Table A3 indicates the YH values for each reactor at T3. The higher active heterotrophic biomass at low temperatures were further supported by the fact that more than 80% of the organic matter in the aerobic reactor was used for the growth of heterotrophic biomass during winter low-temperature conditions. As a consequence of nitrate recycling, the A1-MBBR and A5-MBBR were not anoxic in the traditional sense, with approximately 83% of the organic matter playing a role in the material metabolic processes of the heterotrophic biomass. Such high YH values were also related to the substrate overdose during the test. Under normal conditions, the biomass in the aerobic reactor was always at low substrate concentrations, and A1-MBBR as well as A2-MBBR were not inlet points with low levels of substrate. Faced with a sudden abundance of organic matter, a large amount was rapidly consumed by heterotrophic biomass for material metabolism, resulting in generally high YH values. For the A2-MBBR, A6-MBBR, and A9-MBBR denitrification reactors, which were strictly dominated by heterotrophic biomass, the YH values were 0.6068, 0.6231, and 0.6876, respectively, at T3. The YH values for A9-MBBR were higher than those for the other two reactors, indicating that the easily biodegradable organic matter was more readily available to the biomass.

The YH values of O3-MBBR, O7-MBBR, and A9-MBBR increased with decreasing temperatures (Figure 5), from 0.7956, 0.5352, and 0.5023 (T1) to 0.8867, 0.8604, and 0.6876 (T3), respectively, an increase of 11, 61, and 37%, respectively. The YH value of O7-MBBR was most affected by temperature changes, which is consistent with the growth of active heterotrophic biomass of the second stage MBBR system was greater than the first stage through the whole temperature change process. The nitrate recycling ratio of the second stage was half of that of the first stage, and at higher temperatures the DO in the second stage system was not sufficient to be used by both autotrophic and heterotrophic biomass in the aerobic reactor. As the temperature decreased, the oxygen content in the water increased significantly, which was sufficient to satisfy the needs of both types of biomass without competition, thus enhancing the growth space for heterotrophic biomass, which may be one reason why the YH value of O7-MBBR was significantly higher than that of O3-MBBR. The YH values of A2-MBBR and A6-MBBR were less affected by temperature and decreased with decreasing temperatures, from 0.6718 to 0.6068 and 0.6774 to 0.6231, respectively, with a decrease of 10 and 8%, respectively. This suggests that the ratio coefficient between the growth rate of heterotrophic biomass and the rate of substrate degradation decreased slightly with decreasing temperature, and the consumption of substrate was closely related to the overall number and degradation capacity of heterotrophic biomass. Furthermore, from the perspective of heterotrophic microbial growth only, the carbon source dosing can be appropriately adjusted downwards in winter when the influent load is stable. Moreover, the degree to which denitrification efficiency is affected by low temperatures should be considered when dosing the external carbon sources in practical terms, without wasting energy to maintain a stable system treatment effect.
Figure 5

YH values for O3, O7, A2, A6, and A9 at different temperatures.

Figure 5

YH values for O3, O7, A2, A6, and A9 at different temperatures.

Close modal

Microbial community analysis

The microbial community structure determines the functional properties of a reactor, while temperature and substrate conditions can regulate microbial abundance and diversity at different stages (Wang et al. 2019). The microbial community structure of each reactor was evaluated at different temperatures using high-throughput sequencing techniques. The sample sequence information and diversity index are listed in Supplementary material, Table A4. Figure 6 showed the relative abundance at the phylum and genus levels. A total of 47 different phyla were detected at the three temperatures, with Proteobacteria (21–45%), Chloroflexi (10–32%), Bacteroidota (2–21%), and Actinobacteriota (3–14%) being the top four dominant groups. The sum of these four groups of bacteria in each reactor was above 62%. Chloroflexi is potent in promoting sludge granulation and strengthening of its internal structure. In this study Chloroflexi abundance increased with decreasing temperature in the aerobic reactor and decreased in the anoxic reactor. DO concentrations in the reactor change under low-temperature conditions. It has been shown that when redox substrates (i.e., oxygen and COD) are non-limiting throughout the biofilm, the heterotrophic biofilm quickly grows in a low-density structure (Li et al. 2023), whereas nitrifying biofilms tend to already grow at high densities, even at high substrate concentrations (Winkler et al. 2013). The occurrence of this phenomenon may be linked to the change in the density of the biofilm with temperature. Additionally, Firmicutes increased in abundance with falling temperature (T2 > T3 > T1), and due to their increased resistance to extreme environments, they ensured the stable operation of the system in low and medium temperature conditions.
Figure 6

The microbial community analysis of the multi-stage A/O-MBBR system at different temperatures. (a) Functional microorganisms at the phylum level and (b) functional microorganisms at the genus level.

Figure 6

The microbial community analysis of the multi-stage A/O-MBBR system at different temperatures. (a) Functional microorganisms at the phylum level and (b) functional microorganisms at the genus level.

Close modal

Further, the functional genus of aerobic reactors was analyzed and discussed (Figure 6(b)). Nitrosomonas was the dominant AOB genus and Nitrospira, Nitrolancea, and Candidatus_Nitrotoga were the dominant NOB genera in the aerobic reactor. Nitrospira and Nitrosomonas were the main AOB and NOB identified in wastewater treatment plants. Nitrospira abundance reached 7% (T1) in the O10-MBBR. The abundance of Nitrosomonas with autotrophic ammonia oxidation capacity was significantly higher at T3 than at T1. Candidatus_Nitrotoga, a cold-tolerant genus of nitrifying bacteria, showed optimum growth at T3 and was detected in each reactor at T3, and the abundance in both O4-MBBR and O8-MBBR was about 1%, making it the dominant nitrifying genus after Nitrospira in the aerobic reactor.

For anoxic reactors, Denitratisoma, Flavobacterium, Simplicispira, Thiothrix, and Hydrogenophaga were the main functional genera of denitrifying bacteria. Overall, the abundance of denitrifying genera in the system increased significantly with decreasing temperature, with increased abundance in the post-anoxic reactors (A2 and A6) compared to that in the pre-anoxic reactors (A1 and A5). These findings are consistent with the XH data and the respiration rate tests, indicating that they were closely related to each other. Conversely, Thauera, Rhodobacter, Acinetobacter, Flavobacterium, Thiothrix, Lautropia, and Acidovorax were more abundant in the post-anoxic denitrification reactors, which was different from Zhou et al. (2022), who reported that Rhodobacter, Acinetobacter, and Acidovorax were significantly more abundant in the pre-anoxic reactors. This disparity may be related to the inlet point of the system. Thauera and Flavobacterium were reported to have the ability of aerobic denitrification and heterotrophic nitrification (Hong et al. 2020), with little difference in abundance among reactors. In our study, the abundance of Azospira and Thauera declined with decreasing temperature. For instance, the relative abundance of Azospira and Thauera decreased from 4 to 1% and 1 to 0.3% in A6-MBBR, respectively, when the temperature dropped from T1 to T3. Dechloromonas has been shown to play an important role in simultaneous nitrification denitrification (SND) (Fan et al. 2022), with its levels increasing with decreasing temperature (T3: 0.6% (A2), 0.8% (A6), 4% (A9)), indicating that SND was more likely to occur under low temperature. Furthermore, the Dechloromonas were much higher in A9-MBBR than other anoxic reactors, echoing a previous report (Jia et al. 2020) indicating that its levels decreased under inadequate carbon sources. Additionally, a higher abundance of Nitrospira was observed in the A1-MBBR and A5-MBBR (A1: 1–3%; A5: 1–3%), which corresponded to the more XA in them. Nitrospira was also discovered in A2, A6, and A9 (T1), while being almost absent from A2 and A6 (T2 and T3). This might be explained by the fact that saturated DO was elevated at low temperatures, which was more conducive to the growth of heterotrophic biomass.

Correlation analysis of microbial community with XA, XH, and SOUR

Our previously presented results indicate a strong link between microbial bacteria, active biomass, and respiration rate. Pearson correlations were calculated for active biomass (XA, XH) and SOUR (SOURE, SOURA, and SOURH) at the three temperature conditions with the top 20 terms based on abundance and the functional genus of the anoxic and aerobic reactors (Figure 7).
Figure 7

Correlation analysis of microbial communities with XA, XH, and SOUR in aerobic reactors (a) and anoxic reactors (b).

Figure 7

Correlation analysis of microbial communities with XA, XH, and SOUR in aerobic reactors (a) and anoxic reactors (b).

Close modal

Nitrospira in the aerobic reactor showed a significant positive correlation with SOURA at all temperatures, with a maximum positive correlation coefficient of 0.8216(p < 0.01). The correlation coefficient between Nitrosomonas and SOURA declined with decreasing temperature (ρ = 0.8884 (T1); ρ = 0.4542 (T2); ρ = −0.1982 (T3)) (p < 0.05). Alternatively, there was a negative correlation between Nitrolancea and SOURA, with a maximum negative correlation coefficient of −0.972; however, the correlation fluctuated considerably due to low temperatures. Candidatus_Nitrotoga showed a weaker correlation with SOURA, probably related to the genus occurring only at low temperatures and being less representative in terms of reactive nitrification performance. Among the dominant genus, JG30-KF-CM45, Rhizobiales_Incertae_Sedis, and Romboutsia had a significant positive correlation with SOURA (p < 0.001), with correlation coefficients above 0.5. Gemmatimonadaceae had a significant negative correlation with SOURA (ρ = −0.6776– − 0.9893) (p < 0.001), and the correlation was further strengthened with decreasing temperature. Except for Dokdonella (p < 0.01) and Trichococcus (p < 0.001), which showed significant positive correlations with XA (ρ > 0.7), the correlations between other genera and XA were weak, while most genera in aerobic and anoxic reactors showed significant correlations with XH, which may have a certain relationship with the base of the active biomass type. Additionally, the correlation between the genus and XH as well as SOURE showed a strong consistency in the aerobic reactor, indicating that the biomass decay in the system was mainly dominated by heterotrophic biomass.

Except Hyphomicrobium and Thiobacillus, all other denitrifying genera showed a positive relationship with SOURH and XH, and a negative relationship with XA in anoxic reactors. Thiothrix and Hydrogenophaga showed enhanced positive correlations with SOURH with decreasing temperature (ρ = 0.51 and 0.63 (T1); ρ = 0.99 and 1.00 (T2); ρ = 0.98 and 0.97 (T3), respectively) (p < 0.05). The SND-related Dechloromonas showed a positive correlation with XH (p < 0.01) and SOURH (p < 0.05) and a negative correlation with XA (p < 0.05) (T1). Its correlation with active biomass weakened with decreasing temperature, while its correlation with the respiration rate was slightly increased. Flavobacterium (aerobic denitrification capacity) showed a significant positive correlation with XH (ρ > 0.97) (p < 0.01) and SOURH (p < 0.05). The correlation between Thauera and XH was more significant (ρ = 0.83–0.86) (p < 0.05). As a typical genus of endogenous denitrifying bacteria using an internal carbon source (Salehi et al. 2019), Dechloromonas showed a negative correlation with SOURE (ρ = 0.48–0.67), while Defluviicoccus showed a significant positive correlation with SOURE (ρ = 0.48–0.98) (p < 0.001), with more significant correlations at low temperatures. Finally, the most dominant genera in the anoxic reactor showed significant correlations with XA, XH, and SOURH, and were less influenced by overall temperature.

In summary, the correlation between the observed microbial community, the active biomass, and the specific respiration rate reflects the reliability of the respirometric method for characterizing the microbial performance of the multi-stage A/O-MBBR. As the first study to propose a correlation between microbial community, active biomass, and respiration rate, the method is yet to be validated by similar studies.

In this study, the active biomass distribution, YH of a multi-stage MBBR with nitrogen removal were measured in different conditions. The correlation between SOUR and nitrification as well as denitrification activity was also investigated. The following conclusions were drawn:

  • The total active biomass in the multi-stage A/O-MBBR system was 0.71–1.68 g COD/m2 for the aerobic reactor and 0.39–1.44 g COD/m2 for the anoxic reactor.

  • The increased active biomass at low temperatures can to some extent compensate for the reduced biofilm activity per unit mass.

  • The YH values for the aerobic reactors were 0.82–0.89 at 10–13 °C, which were significantly higher than the recommended value of the activated sludge model (YH = 0.67). However, the anoxic reactors had YH value of 0.61–0.69, which were comparable to YH = 0.67.

  • The correlation coefficient between Nitrospira and SOURA was 0.82. Thiothrix, Hydrogenophaga, Dechloromonas, Flavobacterium and other denitrifying genera showed significant correlation with SOURH and XH.

The results of the correlation analysis between the community and SOUR also concluded that the respiration tests applied in this study can function as a simple-to-apply and reliable method for nitrification and denitrification trouble shooting at WWTPs.

This work was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number: 51908303) and the Research Council of Norway (grant number: 310074/G10).

N.C. investigated the study, did data curation, wrote the original draft, did formal analysis and prepared the methodology. X.W. conceptualized the study, investigated and prepared the methodology, wrote the draft and acquired funds. M.H. investigated the study and did data curation. Z.M. wrote the original draft, revised, and editing the article. H.R. validated the study. X.B. investigated and supervised the study.

All relevant data are included in the paper or its Supplementary Information.

The authors declare there is no conflict.

Almomani
F. A.
,
Delatolla
R.
&
Örmeci
B.
2014
Field study of moving bed biofilm reactor technology for post-treatment of wastewater lagoon effluent at 1°C
.
Environ. Technol.
35
,
1596
1604
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.874500
.
Amin
M.
,
Farokhzaddeh
H.
,
Fatehizadeh
A.
,
Ghasemian
M.
,
Moradpour
H.
,
Nikaeen
M.
,
Shafiea
A.
,
Molayi
R.
&
Sabouri
A.
2013
Biodegradation performance of anaerobic sequencing batch biofilm reactor for oil with polychlorinated biphenyls
.
Int. J. Environ. Health Eng.
2
,
19
.
https://doi.org/10.4103/2277-9183.110175
.
Antoniou
P.
,
Hamilton
J.
,
Koopman
B.
,
Jain
R.
,
Holloway
B.
,
Lyberatos
G.
&
Svoronos
S. A.
1990
Effect of temperature and pH on the effective maximum specific growth rate of nitrifying bacteria
.
Water Res.
24
,
97
101
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/0043-1354(90)90070-M
.
Ashkanani
A.
,
Almomani
F.
,
Khraisheh
M.
,
Bhosale
R.
,
Tawalbeh
M.
&
AlJaml
K.
2019
Bio-carrier and operating temperature effect on ammonia removal from secondary wastewater effluents using moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR)
.
Sci. Total Environ.
693
,
133425
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.231
.
Avcioglu
E.
,
Orhon
D.
&
Sözen
S.
1998
A new method for the assessment of heterotrophic endogenous respiration rate under aerobic and anoxic conditions
.
Water Sci. Technol.
38
,
95
103
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1998.0795
.
Bina
B.
,
Mohammadi
F.
,
Amin
M. M.
,
Pourzamani
H. R.
&
Yavari
Z.
2018
Evaluation of the effects of alkylPhenolic compounds on kinetic coefficients and biomass activity in MBBR by means of respirometric techniques
.
Chinese J. Chem. Eng.
26
,
822
829
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2017.07.024
.
Collivignarelli
M. C.
,
Bertanza
G.
,
Abbà
A.
,
Torretta
V.
&
Katsoyiannis
I. A.
2019
Wastewater treatment by means of thermophilic aerobic membrane reactors: respirometric tests and numerical models for the determination of stoichiometric/kinetic parameters
.
Environ. Technol.
40
,
182
191
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2017.1384070
.
Delatolla
R.
,
Tufenkji
N.
,
Comeau
Y.
,
Gadbois
A.
,
Lamarre
D.
&
Berk
D.
2010
Investigation of laboratory-scale and pilot-scale attached growth ammonia removal kinetics at cold temperature and low influent carbon
.
Water Qual. Res. J.
45
,
427
436
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2010.042
.
di Biase
A.
,
Kowalski
M. S.
,
Devlin
T. R.
&
Oleszkiewicz
J. A.
2021
Modeling of the attached and suspended biomass fractions in a moving bed biofilm reactor
.
Chemosphere
275
,
129937
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129937
.
Di Trapani
D.
,
Capodici
M.
,
Cosenza
A.
,
Di Bella
G.
,
Mannina
G.
,
Torregrossa
M.
&
Viviani
G.
2011
Evaluation of biomass activity and wastewater characterization in a UCT-MBR pilot plant by means of respirometric techniques
.
Desalination
269
,
190
197
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2010.10.061
.
Du
J.
,
Qv
W.
,
Niu
Y.
,
Qv
M.
,
Jin
K.
,
Xie
J.
&
Li
Z.
2022
Nanoplastic pollution inhibits stream leaf decomposition through modulating microbial metabolic activity and fungal community structure
.
J. Hazard. Mater.
424
,
127392
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.127392
.
Fan
Y.
,
Zhang
M.
,
Cheng
J.
,
Yong
D.
,
Ji
J.
,
Wu
Q.
&
He
C.
2022
Elucidating nitrifying performance, nitrite accumulation and microbial community in a three-stage plug flow moving bed biofilm reactor (PF – MBBR)
.
Chemosphere
297
,
134087
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.134087
.
Fathali
D.
,
Rashidi Mehrabadi
A.
,
Mirabi
M.
&
Alimohammadi
M.
2019
Investigation on nitrogen removal performance of an enhanced post-anoxic membrane bioreactor using disintegrated sludge as a carbon source: an experimental study
.
J. Environ. Chem. Eng.
7
,
103445
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2019.103445
.
Fernandes
H.
,
Hoffmann
H.
,
Antonio
R. V.
&
Costa
R. H. R.
2014
The role of microorganisms in a full-scale sequencing batch reactor under low aeration and different cycle times
.
Water Environ. Res.
86
,
800
809
.
https://doi.org/10.2175/106143013X13807328848450
.
Ferrai
M.
,
Guglielmi
G.
&
Andreottola
G.
2010
Modelling respirometric tests for the assessment of kinetic and stoichiometric parameters on MBBR biofilm for municipal wastewater treatment
.
Environ. Model. Softw.
25
,
626
632
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2009.05.005
.
Fu
X.
,
Hou
R.
,
Yang
P.
,
Qian
S.
,
Feng
Z.
,
Chen
Z.
,
Wang
F.
,
Yuan
R.
,
Chen
H.
&
Zhou
B.
2022
Application of external carbon source in heterotrophic denitrification of domestic sewage: a review
.
Sci. Total Environ.
817
,
153061
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153061
.
Ghafari
S.
,
Hasan
M.
&
Aroua
M. K.
2008
Bio-electrochemical removal of nitrate from water and wastewater – a review
.
Bioresour. Technol.
99
,
3965
3974
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.026
.
Gu
Q.
,
Sun
T.
,
Wu
G.
,
Li
M.
&
Qiu
W.
2014
Influence of carrier filling ratio on the performance of moving bed biofilm reactor in treating coking wastewater
.
Bioresour. Technol.
166
,
72
78
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.05.026
.
Gujer
W.
2006
Activated sludge modelling: past, present and future
.
Water Sci. Technol.
53
,
111
119
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2006.082
.
Hayet
C.
,
Saida
B.-A.
,
Youssef
T.
&
Hédi
S.
2016
Study of biodegradability for municipal and industrial Tunisian wastewater by respirometric technique and batch reactor test
.
Sustain. Environ. Res.
26
,
55
62
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.serj.2015.11.001
.
He
S.
,
Wang
Y.
,
Li
C.
,
Li
Y.
&
Zhou
J.
2018
The nitrogen removal performance and microbial communities in a two-stage deep sequencing constructed wetland for advanced treatment of secondary effluent
.
Bioresour. Technol.
248
,
82
88
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.150
.
Helbling
D. E.
,
Johnson
D. R.
,
Lee
T. K.
,
Scheidegger
A.
&
Fenner
K.
2015
A framework for establishing predictive relationships between specific bacterial 16S rRNA sequence abundances and biotransformation rates
.
Water Res.
70
,
471
484
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.12.013
.
Henze, M. Gujer, W. Mino, T. & van Loosedrecht, M. 2000 Activated Sludge Models ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3. IWA Scientific and Technical Report No. 9. IWA Publishing, London, UK.
Hong
P.
,
Wu
X.
,
Shu
Y.
,
Wang
C.
,
Tian
C.
,
Wu
H.
&
Xiao
B.
2020
Bioaugmentation treatment of nitrogen-rich wastewater with a denitrifier with biofilm-formation and nitrogen-removal capacities in a sequencing batch biofilm reactor
.
Bioresour. Technol.
303
,
122905
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122905
.
Hurse
T. J.
&
Connor
M. A.
1999
Nitrogen removal from wastewater treatment lagoons
.
Water Sci. Technol.
39
,
191
198
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1999.0296
.
Jia
Y.
,
Zhou
M.
,
Chen
Y.
,
Hu
Y.
&
Luo
J.
2020
Insight into short-cut of simultaneous nitrification and denitrification process in moving bed biofilm reactor: effects of carbon to nitrogen ratio
.
Chem. Eng. J.
400
,
125905
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2020.125905
.
Johnson
D. R.
,
Helbling
D. E.
,
Lee
T. K.
,
Park
J.
,
Fenner
K.
,
Kohler
H.-P. E.
&
Ackermann
M.
2015
Association of biodiversity with the rates of micropollutant biotransformations among full-scale wastewater treatment plant communities
.
Appl. Environ. Microbiol.
81
,
666
675
.
https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.03286-14
.
Joss
A.
,
Zabczynski
S.
,
Göbel
A.
,
Hoffmann
B.
,
Löffler
D.
,
McArdell
C. S.
,
Ternes
T. A.
,
Thomsen
A.
&
Siegrist
H.
2006
Biological degradation of pharmaceuticals in municipal wastewater treatment: proposing a classification scheme
.
Water Res.
40
,
1686
1696
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.02.014
.
Karanasios
K. A.
,
Vasiliadou
I. A.
,
Pavlou
S.
&
Vayenas
D. V.
2010
Hydrogenotrophic denitrification of potable water: a review
.
J. Hazard. Mater.
180
,
20
37
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2010.04.090
.
Kumar
M.
,
Lee
P.-Y.
,
Fukusihma
T.
,
Whang
L.-M.
&
Lin
J.-G.
2012
Effect of supplementary carbon addition in the treatment of low C/N high-technology industrial wastewater by MBR
.
Bioresour. Technol.
113
,
148
153
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.102
.
Leyva-Díaz
J. C.
,
Martín-Pascual
J.
,
González-López
J.
,
Hontoria
E.
&
Poyatos
J. M.
2013
Effects of scale-up on a hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor – membrane bioreactor for treating urban wastewater
.
Chem. Eng. Sci.
104
,
808
816
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2013.10.004
.
Li
C.
,
Gu
Z.
,
Zhu
S.
&
Liu
D.
2020
17β-Estradiol removal routes by moving bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs) under various C/N ratios
.
Sci. Total Environ.
741
,
140381
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.140381
.
Li
J.
,
Zheng
L.
,
Ye
C.
,
Ni
B.
,
Wang
X.
&
Liu
H.
2021
Evaluation of an intermittent-aeration constructed wetland for removing residual organics and nutrients from secondary effluent: performance and microbial analysis
.
Bioresour. Technol.
329
,
124897
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124897
.
Li
M.
,
Perez-Calleja
P.
,
Kim
B.
,
Picioreanu
C.
&
Nerenberg
R.
2023
Unique stratification of biofilm density in heterotrophic membrane-aerated biofilms: an experimental and modeling study
.
Chemosphere
327
,
138501
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.138501
.
Luan
Y.-N.
,
Yin
Y.
,
An
Y.
,
Zhang
F.
,
Wang
X.
,
Zhao
F.
,
Xiao
Y.
&
Liu
C.
2022
Investigation of an intermittently-aerated moving bed biofilm reactor in rural wastewater treatment under low dissolved oxygen and C/N condition
.
Bioresour. Technol.
358
,
127405
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127405
.
Ma
Q.
,
Qu
Y.
,
Shen
W.
,
Zhang
Z.
,
Wang
J.
,
Liu
Z.
,
Li
D.
,
Li
H.
&
Zhou
J.
2015
Bacterial community compositions of coking wastewater treatment plants in steel industry revealed by illumina high-throughput sequencing
.
Bioresour. Technol.
179
,
436
443
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.12.041
.
Mansouri
A. M.
2014
Kinetic evaluation of simultaneous CNP removal in an up-flow aerobic/Anoxic sludge fixed film (UAASFF) bioreactor
.
Iran. J. Energy Environ.
5
.
https://doi.org/10.5829/idosi.ijee.2014.05.03.12
.
Morgan-Sagastume
F.
2018
Biofilm development, activity and the modification of carrier material surface properties in moving-bed biofilm reactors (MBBRs) for wastewater treatment
.
Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol.
48
,
439
470
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/10643389.2018.1465759
.
Ochoa
J. C.
,
Colprim
J.
,
Palacios
B.
,
Paul
E.
&
Chatellier
P.
2002
Active heterotrophic and autotrophic biomass distribution between fixed and suspended systems in a hybrid biological reactor
.
Water Sci. Technol.
46
,
397
404
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2002.0507
.
Ooi
G. T. H.
,
Tang
K.
,
Chhetri
R. K.
,
Kaarsholm
K. M. S.
,
Sundmark
K.
,
Kragelund
C.
,
Litty
K.
,
Christensen
A.
,
Lindholst
S.
,
Sund
C.
,
Christensson
M.
,
Bester
K.
&
Andersen
H. R.
2018
Biological removal of pharmaceuticals from hospital wastewater in a pilot-scale staged moving bed biofilm reactor (MBBR) utilising nitrifying and denitrifying processes
.
Bioresour. Technol.
267
,
677
687
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2018.07.077
.
Pelaz
L.
,
Gómez
A.
,
Letona
A.
,
Garralón
G.
&
Fdz-Polanco
M.
2018
Nitrogen removal in domestic wastewater. effect of nitrate recycling and COD/N ratio
.
Chemosphere
212
,
8
14
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.08.052
.
Piculell
M.
,
Welander
T.
&
Jönsson
K.
2014
Organic removal activity in biofilm and suspended biomass fractions of MBBR systems
.
Water Sci. Technol.
69
,
55
61
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.552
.
Polesel
F.
,
Torresi
E.
,
Loreggian
L.
,
Casas
M. E.
,
Christensson
M.
,
Bester
K.
&
Plósz
B. G.
2017
Removal of pharmaceuticals in pre-denitrifying MBBR – influence of organic substrate availability in single- and three-stage configurations
.
Water Res.
123
,
408
419
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2017.06.068
.
Salehi
S.
,
Cheng
K. Y.
,
Heitz
A.
&
Ginige
M. P.
2019
Simultaneous nitrification, denitrification and phosphorus recovery (SNDPr) – an opportunity to facilitate full-scale recovery of phosphorus from municipal wastewater
.
J. Environ. Manage.
238
,
41
48
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.063
.
Sánchez-Zurano
A.
,
Rossi
S.
,
Fernández-Sevilla
J. M.
,
Acién-Fernández
G.
,
Molina-Grima
E.
&
Ficara
E.
2022
Respirometric assessment of bacterial kinetics in algae-bacteria and activated sludge processes
.
Bioresour. Technol.
352
,
127116
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2022.127116
.
Strotmann
U. J.
,
Geldem
A.
,
Kuhn
A.
,
Gendig
C.
&
Klein
S.
1999
Evaluation of a respirometric test method to determine the heterotrophic yield coefficient of activated sludge bacteria
.
Chemosphere
38
,
3555
3570
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0045-6535(98)00569-4
.
Sun
F.
,
Lv
X.
,
Li
J.
,
Peng
Z.
,
Li
P.
&
Shao
M.
2014
Activated sludge filterability improvement by nitrifying bacteria abundance regulation in an adsorption membrane bioreactor (Ad-MBR)
.
Bioresour. Technol.
170
,
230
238
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2014.07.092
.
Torresi
E.
,
Escolà Casas
M.
,
Polesel
F.
,
Plósz
B. G.
,
Christensson
M.
&
Bester
K.
2017
Impact of external carbon dose on the removal of micropollutants using methanol and ethanol in post-denitrifying moving bed biofilm reactors
.
Water Res.
108
,
95
105
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.10.068
.
Torresi
E.
,
Gülay
A.
,
Polesel
F.
,
Jensen
M. M.
,
Christensson
M.
,
Smets
B. F.
&
Plósz
B. G.
2018
Reactor staging influences microbial community composition and diversity of denitrifying MBBRs- implications on pharmaceutical removal
.
Water Res.
138
,
333
345
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2018.03.014
.
Vanrolleghem
P. A.
,
Spanjers
H.
,
Petersen
B.
,
Ginestet
P.
&
Takacs
I.
1999
Estimating (combinations of) activated sludge model no. 1 parameters and components by respirometry
.
Water Sci. Technol.
39
,
195
214
.
https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.1999.0042
.
Vasiliadou
I. A.
,
Molina
R.
,
Martinez
F.
,
Melero
J. A.
,
Stathopoulou
P. M.
&
Tsiamis
G.
2018
Toxicity assessment of pharmaceutical compounds on mixed culture from activated sludge using respirometric technique: the role of microbial community structure
.
Sci. Total Environ.
630
,
809
819
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.02.095
.
Wang
J.
&
Chu
L.
2016
Biological nitrate removal from water and wastewater by solid-phase denitrification process
.
Biotechnol. Adv.
34
,
1103
1112
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.07.001
.
Wang
X.
,
Bi
X.
,
Hem
L. J.
&
Ratnaweera
H.
2018
Microbial community composition of a multi-stage moving bed biofilm reactor and its interaction with kinetic model parameters estimation
.
J. Environ. Manage.
218
,
340
347
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.04.015
.
Wang
X.
,
Zhao
J.
,
Yu
D.
,
Du
S.
,
Yuan
M.
&
Zhen
J.
2019
Evaluating the potential for sustaining mainstream anammox by endogenous partial denitrification and phosphorus removal for energy-efficient wastewater treatment
.
Bioresour. Technol.
284
,
302
314
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2019.03.127
.
Winkler
M. K.
,
Kleerebezem
R.
,
Strous
M.
,
Chandran
K.
&
van Loosdrecht
M. C. M.
2013
Factors influencing the density of aerobic granular sludge
.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
97
(
16
),
7459
7468
.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00253-012-4459-4
.
Wu
S.
,
Kuschk
P.
,
Brix
H.
,
Vymazal
J.
&
Dong
R.
2014
Development of constructed wetlands in performance intensifications for wastewater treatment: a nitrogen and organic matter targeted review
.
Water Res.
57
,
40
55
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2014.03.020
.
Young
B.
,
Delatolla
R.
,
Ren
B.
,
Kennedy
K.
,
Laflamme
E.
&
Stintzi
A.
2016
Pilot-scale tertiary MBBR nitrification at 1 °C: characterization of ammonia removal rate, solids settleability and biofilm characteristics
.
Environ. Technol.
37
,
2124
2132
.
https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2016.1143037
.
Young
B.
,
Delatolla
R.
,
Kennedy
K.
,
Laflamme
E.
&
Stintzi
A.
2017a
Low temperature MBBR nitrification: microbiome analysis
.
Water Res.
111
,
224
233
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.12.050
.
Young
B.
,
Delatolla
R.
,
Kennedy
K.
,
LaFlamme
E.
&
Stintzi
A.
2017b
Post carbon removal nitrifying MBBR operation at high loading and exposure to starvation conditions
.
Bioresour. Technol.
239
,
318
325
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.024
.
Zhang
H.
,
Gao
Z.
,
Shi
M.
&
Fang
S.
2020
Soil bacterial diversity and its relationship with soil CO2 and mineral composition: a case study of the Laiwu experimental site
.
Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health
17
,
5699
.
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165699
.
Zhou
X.
,
Bi
X.
,
Fan
X.
,
Yang
T.
,
Wang
X.
,
Chen
S.
,
Cheng
L.
,
Zhang
Y.
,
Zhao
W.
,
Zhao
F.
,
Nie
S.
&
Deng
X.
2022
Performance and bacterial community analysis of a two-stage A/O-MBBR system with multiple reactors for biological nitrogen removal
.
Chemosphere
303
,
135195
.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2.135195
.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which permits copying, adaptation and redistribution, provided the original work is properly cited (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Supplementary data