As population and water demand increase, there is a growing need for alternative water supplies from water reuse and desalination systems. These systems are beneficial to water augmentation; however, there are concerns related to their carbon footprint. This study compiles the reported carbon footprint of these systems from existing literature, recognizes general trends of carbon footprint of water reuse and desalination, and identifies challenges associated with comparing the carbon footprint. Furthermore, limitations, challenges, knowledge gaps, and recommendations associated with carbon footprint estimation tools are presented. Reverse osmosis (RO) technologies were found to have lower CO2 emissions than thermal desalination technologies and the estimated carbon footprint of seawater RO desalination (0.4–6.7 kg CO2eq/m3) is generally larger than brackish water RO desalination (0.4–2.5 kg CO2eq/m3) and water reuse systems (0.1–2.4 kg CO2eq/m3). The large range of reported values is due to variability in location, technologies, life cycle stages, parameters considered, and estimation tools, which were identified as major challenges to making accurate comparisons. Carbon footprint estimation tools could be improved by separating emissions by unit process, direct and indirect emissions, and considering the offset potential of various resource recovery strategies.
Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
December 2014
This article was originally published in
Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination
Article Contents
Research Article|
April 29 2014
Carbon footprint of water reuse and desalination: a review of greenhouse gas emissions and estimation tools
Pablo K. Cornejo;
Pablo K. Cornejo
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, Tampa FL 33620, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Mark V. E. Santana;
Mark V. E. Santana
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, Tampa FL 33620, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
David R. Hokanson;
David R. Hokanson
2Trussell Technologies Inc., 232 N Lake Ave, Pasadena, CA 91101, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
James R. Mihelcic;
James R. Mihelcic
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, Tampa FL 33620, USA
Search for other works by this author on:
Qiong Zhang
1Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of South Florida, 4202 E. Fowler Avenue, Tampa FL 33620, USA
E-mail: [email protected]
Search for other works by this author on:
Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination (2014) 4 (4): 238–252.
Article history
Received:
December 03 2013
Accepted:
March 25 2014
Citation
Pablo K. Cornejo, Mark V. E. Santana, David R. Hokanson, James R. Mihelcic, Qiong Zhang; Carbon footprint of water reuse and desalination: a review of greenhouse gas emissions and estimation tools. Journal of Water Reuse and Desalination 1 December 2014; 4 (4): 238–252. doi: https://doi.org/10.2166/wrd.2014.058
Download citation file: