In order to analyse the differences between the simulation performance of flood events and continuous flow series, three sets of calibration results, i.e., the average values of performance measures of 30 individual flood events, performance measures calculated by putting 30 flood events together, and performance measures of continuous flow series are presented in Table 4.
The calibration performance of flood events series and continuous flow series with different objective functions
. | Average of 30 individual flood events . | Total flood events . | Continuous flow series . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scheme . | RE (%) . | NSE . | RE (%) . | NSE . | RE (%) . | NSE . |
1 | 4.67 | 0.8386 | −1.05 | 0.9258 | 5.98 | 0.8676 |
2 | 6.98 | 0.8892 | −0.12 | 0.9675 | −18.73 | 0.8809 |
3 | 24.79 | 0.4217 | 16.55 | 0.8363 | 0.92 | 0.8134 |
4 | 5.8 | 0.8793 | −1.98 | 0.9635 | 0.49 | 0.8927 |
5 | 7.06 | 0.4368 | 0.98 | 0.7902 | −14.59 | 0.7746 |
6 | 7.93 | 0.8894 | 0.31 | 0.9590 | −12.66 | 0.8861 |
7 | 7.29 | 0.8923 | 0.59 | 0.9578 | −14.73 | 0.8803 |
. | Average of 30 individual flood events . | Total flood events . | Continuous flow series . | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Scheme . | RE (%) . | NSE . | RE (%) . | NSE . | RE (%) . | NSE . |
1 | 4.67 | 0.8386 | −1.05 | 0.9258 | 5.98 | 0.8676 |
2 | 6.98 | 0.8892 | −0.12 | 0.9675 | −18.73 | 0.8809 |
3 | 24.79 | 0.4217 | 16.55 | 0.8363 | 0.92 | 0.8134 |
4 | 5.8 | 0.8793 | −1.98 | 0.9635 | 0.49 | 0.8927 |
5 | 7.06 | 0.4368 | 0.98 | 0.7902 | −14.59 | 0.7746 |
6 | 7.93 | 0.8894 | 0.31 | 0.9590 | −12.66 | 0.8861 |
7 | 7.29 | 0.8923 | 0.59 | 0.9578 | −14.73 | 0.8803 |