The performance of the proposed AMP approach was also verified with a real field data set example of a constant-drawdown test obtained from Artesia Heights well near Grand Junction, Colorado in 1948 (Lohman 1965). The radius of the well of interest and the constant-head maintained at the well
were reported to be 0.084 m and 28.14 m, respectively. The test results are tabulated in Table 3.
Lohman (1965) data
Observation # . | Time . | Discharge . |
---|---|---|
i . | t (min) . | Q (m3/min) . |
1 | 1 | 0.02756 |
2 | 2 | 0.02626 |
3 | 3 | 0.02604 |
4 | 4 | 0.02377 |
5 | 5 | 0.02354 |
6 | 6 | 0.02354 |
7 | 8 | 0.02252 |
8 | 11 | 0.02214 |
9 | 16 | 0.02142 |
10 | 21 | 0.02082 |
11 | 26 | 0.02021 |
12 | 31 | 0.02021 |
13 | 41.5 | 0.01976 |
14 | 51 | 0.01951 |
15 | 61 | 0.01934 |
16 | 76 | 0.01911 |
17 | 91 | 0.01892 |
18 | 103 | 0.01862 |
Observation # . | Time . | Discharge . |
---|---|---|
i . | t (min) . | Q (m3/min) . |
1 | 1 | 0.02756 |
2 | 2 | 0.02626 |
3 | 3 | 0.02604 |
4 | 4 | 0.02377 |
5 | 5 | 0.02354 |
6 | 6 | 0.02354 |
7 | 8 | 0.02252 |
8 | 11 | 0.02214 |
9 | 16 | 0.02142 |
10 | 21 | 0.02082 |
11 | 26 | 0.02021 |
12 | 31 | 0.02021 |
13 | 41.5 | 0.01976 |
14 | 51 | 0.01951 |
15 | 61 | 0.01934 |
16 | 76 | 0.01911 |
17 | 91 | 0.01892 |
18 | 103 | 0.01862 |