As a first experiment, the whole data set, that lies within an integration window, 
, being approximately equal to 2, was utilized. The proposed methodology described in previous sections produced the output given in Table 4. To verify the accuracy of the method, the estimated transmissivity and storativity values were substituted in Equation (3) to regenerate the discharge values. The calculated and the observed discharge values are seen to be in good agreement, as can be seen in Figure 9.
, being approximately equal to 2, was utilized. The proposed methodology described in previous sections produced the output given in Table 4. To verify the accuracy of the method, the estimated transmissivity and storativity values were substituted in Equation (3) to regenerate the discharge values. The calculated and the observed discharge values are seen to be in good agreement, as can be seen in Figure 9.Table 4
The application of AMP with results
| Fit parameters | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Δ | a | b | c | d | α | G(α) | T (m2/min) | S |
| 0.178502 | 2 | −2.33966 | 1.827029 | 0.697556 | −2.43785 | 5345.233 | 0.208434 | 0.000748 | 1.98 × 10−5 |
| Fit parameters | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | Δ | a | b | c | d | α | G(α) | T (m2/min) | S |
| 0.178502 | 2 | −2.33966 | 1.827029 | 0.697556 | −2.43785 | 5345.233 | 0.208434 | 0.000748 | 1.98 × 10−5 |
Figure 9
Comparison of observed and calculated flowrates.